Projections of the sensory trigeminal nucleus in a percomorph teleost, tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

The sensory trigeminal nucleus of teleosts is the rostralmost nucleus among the trigeminal sensory nuclear group in the rhombencephalon. The sensory trigeminal nucleus is known to receive the somatosensory afferents of the ophthalmic, maxillar, and mandibular nerves. However, the central connections of the sensory trigeminal nucleus remain unclear. Efferents of the sensory trigeminal nucleus were examined by means of tract-tracing methods, in a percomorph teleost, tilapia. After tracer injections to the sensory trigeminal nucleus, labeled terminals were seen bilaterally in the ventromedial thalamic nucleus, periventricular pretectal nucleus, medial part of preglomerular nucleus, stratum album centrale of the optic tectum, ventrolateral nucleus of the semicircular torus, lateral valvular nucleus, prethalamic nucleus, tegmentoterminal nucleus, and superior and inferior reticular formation, with preference for the contralateral side. Labeled terminals were also found bilaterally in the oculomotor nucleus, trochlear nucleus, trigeminal motor nucleus, facial motor nucleus, facial lobe, descending trigeminal nucleus, medial funicular nucleus, and contralateral sensory trigeminal nucleus and inferior olive. Labeled terminals in the oculomotor nucleus and trochlear nucleus showed similar densities on both sides of the brain. However, labelings in the trigeminal motor nucleus, facial motor nucleus, facial lobe, descending trigeminal nucleus, and medial funicular nucleus showed a clear ipsilateral dominance. Reciprocal tracer injection experiments to the ventromedial thalamic nucleus, optic tectum, and semicircular torus resulted in labeled cell bodies in the sensory trigeminal nucleus, with a few also in the descending trigeminal nucleus.     

The development of the Purkinje cell in the cerebellar cortex of the opossum

Premotor neurons sending their axons to the trigeminal motor nucleus were observed in the cat by light and electron microscopy after labeling the neurons retrogradely or anterogradely with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). After HRP injection into the trigeminal motor nucleus, retrogradely labeled neurons were seen most frequently in the parvocellular reticular formation bilaterally. Many labeled neurons were also seen contralaterally in the intermediate zone at the rostralmost levels of the cervical cord and its rostral extension into the caudalmost levels of the medulla oblongata. Additionally, some neurons were labeled ipsilaterally in the mesencephalic tri-geminal nucleus, contralaterally in the main sensory trigeminal nucleus and the trigeminal motor nucleus, and bilaterally in the oral and interpolar sub-nuclei of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Only a few labeled neurons were seen in the confines of the gigantocellular reticular formation. All labeled neurons were small or of medium size; no large neurons were labeled. After HRP injection into the regions around the trigeminal motor nucleus or the parvocellular reticular formation, axodendritic terminals containing HRP granules were found contralaterally within the trigeminal motor nucleus. Some of these labeled terminals were filled with round synap-tic vesicles and others contained pleomorphic synaptic vesicles. The varied morphology of labeled axon terminals was considered to reflect the functional heterogeneity of the premotor neurons for the trigeminal motor nucleus.     

Morphology of jaw-muscle spindle afferents in the rat

The morphology of jaw-muscle spindle afferents in the rat has been studied by intra-axonal injection of horseradish peroxidase. All stained axons were located in the motor root of the trigeminal nerve and could be traced dorsomedially to the vicinity of the trigeminal motor nucleus, where they divided into an ascending branch in the tract of the mesencephalic nucleus and a descending branch in the tract of Probst. Axon collaterals and swellings on fine collateral branches presumed to be synaptic boutons were located in the following regions: the trigeminal motor nucleus, the region dorsal to the trigeminal motor nucleus including the supratrigeminal nucleus, the parvicellular reticular formation immediately caudal to the trigeminal motor nucleus, the reticular formation at the level of the facial nucleus, and the caudal portion of the mesencephalic nucleus. No evidence of a projection to the cerebellum was observed. Boutons were most numerous in the region surrounding the trigeminal motor nucleus, especially dorsally. Here they were not demonstrated in close proximity to counterstained cells, and therefore it was not possible to determine how many of these contacts are located on cells in this region and how many are on the distal dendrites of trigeminal motorneurons. Boutons located within the trigeminal motor nucleus were always confined to a small portion of the nucleus and were significantly larger than those located dorsally. Some boutons were found in close apposition to trigeminal motorneurons and presumably make somatic contacts. These results suggest that jaw-muscle spindle afferents make somatic and proximal dendritic contacts with only a limited number of trigeminal motorneurons and also project to masticatory interneuronal regions dorsal and caudal to the motor nucleus.     

Temporal onset of synapsin I gene expression coincides with neuronal differentiation during the development of the nervous system

The spinal trigeminal nucleus is involved in the transmission of orofacial sensory information. Neither the distribution of the neuromessenger, nitric oxide, within the trigeminal system nor the possible relationship of this simple gas with trigeminothalamic neurons has been carefully studied. Using immunocytochemical (against nitric oxide synthase) and histochemical (NADPH-diaphorase staining) techniques, we have found that nitric oxide neurons and processes are more prominent in the nucleus caudalis and the dorsomedial aspect of the nucleus oralis than in other spinal trigeminal regions. To study the relationship of nitric oxide to trigeminothalamic neurons and intertrigeminal interneurons of the spinal trigeminal nucleus, spinal trigeminal neurons were retrogradely labeled with fluorogold by thalamic injections or by injections into the junction of the nucleus interpolaris and nucleus caudalis. Medullary sections were subsequently processed with NADPH-diaphorase histochemistry. None of the diaphorase-stained neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus was found to contain fluorogold; however, some diaphorase-stained processes were found in close proximity to trigeminothalamic neurons. Following spinal trigeminal nucleus injections, many diaphorasestained neurons were found to contain fluorogold, especially in the nucleus caudalis, suggesting that nitric oxide-containing neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus are intertrigeminal interneurons. Collectively, these data indicate that nitric oxide is most prominent in interneurons located in nucleus caudalis and that these interneurons give rise to processes that appose trigeminothalamic neurons, raising the possibility that they may indirectly influence orofacial nociceptive processing at the level of the spinal trigeminal nucleus via nitric oxide production. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Pathway of the blink reflex in the brainstem of the cat: Interneurons between the trigeminal nuclei and the facial nucleus

Blink reflex responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve were examined using cats and the pathway of the blink reflex in the brainstem was elucidated. Both early response (ER) and late response (LR) were mediated by the main sensory trigeminal nucleus and the spinal trigeminal nucleus. However, a lesion of the main sensory trigeminal nucleus had less effect on the blink reflex than a lesion of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. The ER was mediated not only by the shorter disynaptic pathway of 3 neurons through the trigeminal nerve, the trigeminal nuclei and the facial nucleus but also by a polysynaptic pathway of 4 neurons. The interneurons were located between the trigeminal nuclei and the facial nucleus. Some of these interneurons participated in the production of both ER and LR. The area of the brainstem responsible for ER and LR of the blink reflex was the reticular formation from the rostral part of the medulla to the pons except the medial area around the median sulcus. The LR interneurons were distributed more widely than the ER interneurons.     

Projection fibers from the main sensory trigeminal nucleus and the supratrigeminal region

Fiber projections from the main sensory trigeminal nucleus and the supratrigeminal region (reticular formation dorsal and rostrodorsal to the motor trigeminal nucleus) in the cat and monkey have been studied by the Nauta, Fink-Heimer and Marchi methods. Following experimental lesions in the main sensory trigeminal nucleus and its vicinity, the crossed ventral and the uncrossed dorsal trigeminal tracts were traced rostrally to the posteromedial ventral nucleus of the thalamus. The uncrossed dorsal trigeminal tract ascended through Forel's tegmental fascicle (tractus fasciculorum tegmenti Foreli). However, Forel's tegmental fascicle was composed mainly of the ascending reticular fibers terminating in the intralaminar nuclei of the thalamus and in the subthalamus. Commissural components distributing chidfly to the motor trigeminal nucleus of the opposite side appeared to arise from the supratrigeminal region as well as from the main sensory trigeminal nucleus. A fiber bundle, arising from the reticular zones surrounding the motor trigeminal nucleus, descended through the lateral reticular formation immediately ventromedial to the spinal trigeminal nucleus down to lower levels of the medulla oblongata. The functional significance of the supratrigeminal region as an interneuron system intercalated between the trigeminal sensory and the cranial motor systems is discussed.     

Cerebral cortical projections to the reticular regions around the trigeminal motor nucleus in the cat

Cerebral cortical regions which send projection fibers to the reticular regions around the trigeminal motor nucleus were identified in the cat by the horseradish peroxidase (HRP) method. The reticular region around the trigeminal motor nucleus are known to contain many interneurons for masticatory motoneurons. After injections of HRP into the reticular regions around the trigeminal motor nucleus, HRP-labeled neuronal cell bodies in the cerebral cortex were found in layer V. They were distributed bilaterally in the orbitofrontal cortical regions, mainly in the rostral extension of the orbital gyrus close to the presylvian sulcus; more were located in the floor and lateral bank of the presylvian sulcus than in the crown of the orbital gyrus. After injections of HRP conjugated with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA-HRP) into these cortical regions, many labeled presumed axon terminals were distributed bilaterally in the reticular regions around the trigeminal motor nucleus; mainly in the region ventral to the trigeminal motor nucleus and in the intertrigeminal region between the main sensory trigeminal nucleus and the trigeminal motor nucleus. Terminal labeling in these regions was more prominent after WGA-HRP injection into the lateral bank of the presylvian sulcus than after WGA-HRP injection into the crown of the orbital gyrus. Thus, the present results indicate that the main part of the cortical region projecting directly to the reticular regions around the trigeminal motor nucleus in the cat is folded into the presylvian sulcus.     

Primary and secondary sensory trigeminal projections in a cyprinid teleost, carp (Cyprinus carpio)

Primary and secondary sensory trigeminal projections were studied by means of tract-tracing methods in a cyprinid teleost, the carp. Tracer injections into the trigeminal nerve root labeled terminals in the ipsilateral principal sensory trigeminal nucleus, descending trigeminal nucleus, medial funicular nucleus, facial lobe, and medial part of posterior lateral valvular nucleus. The principal sensory trigeminal nucleus is considered a major origin of the secondary sensory trigeminal projections in teleosts. To investigate the secondary sensory trigeminal projections, tracer injections were performed into the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus. The present study suggests that the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus projects to the bilateral ventromedial thalamic nucleus, periventricular pretectal nucleus, stratum album centrale of the optic tectum, caudomedial region of lateral preglomerular nucleus, ventrolateral nucleus of semicircular torus, medial part of rostral and posterior lateral valvular nucleus, oculomotor nucleus, trochlear nucleus, trigeminal motor nucleus, facial motor nucleus, superior and inferior reticular formation, descending trigeminal nucleus, medial funicular nucleus, inferior olive, and to the contralateral sensory trigeminal nucleus. These observations indicate that the primary and secondary trigeminal sensory projections of a cyprinid teleost, the carp, are similar to those in percomorph teleosts.     

Amygdaloid pathway to the trigeminal motor nucleus via the pontine reticular formation in the rat

The connections of the amygdala with the trigeminal motor nucleus were studied by light and electron microscopy. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) experiments showed that the pontine reticular formation, ventromedial to the spinal trigeminal nucleus at the level rostral to the genu of the facial nerve, receives fibers from the central nucleus of the amygdala ipsilaterally and sends fibers to the trigeminal motor nucleus contralaterally. Electron microscopic observations were carried out on the pontine reticular formation after electrolytic lesions in the central nucleus of the amygdala and HRP injections into the contralateral trigeminal motor nucleus were made on the same animal. These experiments using the combined degeneration and HRP technique clearly demonstrated that degenerating amygdaloid fibers made synaptic contacts with retrogradely labeled neurons.     

Central connections of the trigeminal motor command system in the weakly electric Elephantnose fish (Gnathonemus petersii)

The highly mobile chin appendage of Gnathonemus petersii, the Schnauzenorgan, is used to actively probe the environment and is known to be a fovea of the electrosensory system. It receives an important innervation from both the trigeminal sensory and motor systems. However, little is known about the premotor control pathways that coordinate the movements of the Schnauzenorgan, or about central pathways originating from the trigeminal motor nucleus. The present study focuses on the central connections of the trigeminal motor system to elucidate premotor centers controlling Schnauzenorgan movements, with particular interest in the possible connections between the electrosensory and trigeminal systems. Neurotracer injections into the trigeminal motor nucleus revealed bilateral, reciprocal connections between the two trigeminal motor nuclei and between the trigeminal sensory and motor nuclei by bilateral labeling of cells and terminals. Prominent afferent input to the trigeminal motor nucleus originates from the nucleus lateralis valvulae, the nucleus dorsalis mesencephali, the cerebellar corpus C1, the reticular formation, and the Raphe nuclei. Retrogradely labeled cells were also observed in the central pretectal nucleus, the dorsal anterior pretectal nucleus, the tectum, the ventroposterior nucleus of the torus semicircularis, the gustatory sensory and motor nuclei, and in the hypothalamus. Labeled terminals, but not cell bodies, were observed in the nucleus lateralis valvulae and the reticular formation. No direct connections were found between the electrosensory system and the V motor nucleus but the central connections identified would provide several multisynaptic pathways linking these two systems, including possible efference copy and corollary discharge mechanisms.     

Histochemical demonstration of vibrissae-representing patchy patterns of cytochrome oxidase activity within the trigeminal sensory nuclei in the cat

Cytochrome oxidase histochemistry revealed patchy patterns of the enzyme activity in transverse sections through the caudal part of the ventral subnucleus of the principal sensory trigeminal nucleus, interpolar spinal trigeminal nucleus, and layer IV of the caudal spinal trigeminal nucleus in the cat. By the transganglionic transport method of horseradish peroxidase, the patterns were indicated to replicate the spatial array of the facial vibrissae.     

Somatotopic organization of the trigeminal ganglion cells in a cichlid fish, Oreochromis (Tilapia) niloticus

Somatotopic organization of the trigeminal ganglion is known in some vertebrates. The precise pattern of somatotopy, however, seems to vary in different vertebrate groups. Furthermore, the somatotopic organization remains to be studied in teleosts. From an evolutionary point of view, the morphology and somatotopic organization of the trigeminal ganglion of a percomorph teleost, Tilapia, were investigated by means of the tract-tracing method using biocytin and three-dimensional reconstruction models with a computer. The trigeminal ganglion was one cell aggregate elongated in the dorsoventral direction, which was separate from the facial and anterior lateral line ganglia. Biocytin applications to the trigeminal nerve root labeled ordinary ganglion cells in the trigeminal ganglion and a few displaced trigeminal ganglion cells in the facial ganglion. Biocytin applications to three primary branches (the ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular nerves) revealed that trigeminal ganglion cells were somatotopically distributed in the ganglion reflecting the dorsoventral order of the three branches. Ganglion cells of the ophthalmic nerve were distributed in the dorsal part of the trigeminal ganglion, those of the mandibular nerve in the ventral part, and those of the maxillary nerve in the intermediate part. Some of maxillary and mandibular ganglion cells appear to overlap in their boundary region, whereas ophthalmic ganglion cells did not intermingle with ganglion cells of other branches. Labeled-primary fibers terminated in the sensory trigeminal nucleus, descending trigeminal nucleus, medial funicular nucleus, a ventral part of the facial lobe, reticular formation, and trigeminal motor nucleus. Labeled cells were observed in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus and the trigeminal motor nucleus. The results suggest that the morphology and somatotopic organization of the trigeminal ganglion of tilapia are similar to those of mammals, except that the axis of the somatotopic organization of the ganglion in mammals is a mediolateral direction reflecting the mediolateral order of the ophthalmic, maxillary, and mandibular nerves.     

Efferent projections from temperature sensitive recording loci within the marginal zone of the nucleus caudalis of the spinal trigeminal complex in the cat

The efferent projections from nucleus caudalis of the spinal trigeminal complex in cats were studied with retrograde and anterograde axonal transport techniques combined with localization of recording sites in the thalamus and marginal zone of nucleus caudalis to innocuous skin cooling. Results showed brainstem projections from nucleus caudalis to rostral levels of the spinal trigeminal complex, to the ventral division of the principal trigeminal nucleus, the parabrachial nucleus, cranial motor nuclei 7 and 12, solitary complex, contralateral dorsal inferior olivary nucleus, portions of the lateral reticular formation, upper cervical spinal dorsal horn and, lateral cervical nucleus. Projections to the thalamus included: a dorsomedial region of VPM (bilaterally) and to the main part of VPM and PO contralaterally. Neuronal activity was recorded in the dorsomedial region of VPM to cooling the ipsilateral tongue. HRP injections in this thalamic region retrogradely labeled marginal neurons in nucleus caudalis. These results show that marginal neurons of nucleus caudalis provide a trigeminal equivalent of spinothalamic projections to the ventroposterior nucleus in cats.     

A tract-tracing study of the central projections of the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminus in the guppy (Lebistes reticulatus, Teleostei), with some observations on the descending trigeminal tract

We studied the central projections of the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve (MesV) in the guppy (Lebistes reticulatus), after application of horseradish peroxidase or fluorescein dextran amine into the eye orbit. A small number (1 to 13) of large mesencephalic trigeminal neurons were solid labelled in the ipsilateral rostral mesencephalon. At the level of the trigeminal nerve entrance, the united process of each mesencephalic trigeminal cell bifurcates, giving rise to a peripheral branch that exits in the trigeminal nerve and a descending branch that runs caudally in a medial bundle separated from the descending trigeminal tract. This bundle passes close to the visceromotor nuclei of the medulla oblongata. Descending processes give rise to short collaterals to the descending nucleus of the trigeminus and the ventrolateral reticular area. Most MesV descending fibres terminate in this ventrolateral field at the transition of the medulla to the spinal cord, but one or two fibres could be followed to the C6 level, where they give rise to collaterals to the dorsal funicular nucleus. No collaterals directed to the trigeminal motor nucleus, the cerebellum, or the mesencephalic tegmentum were observed. These projections were also compared with those of the descending trigeminal tract.     

The development of the human motor trigeminal complex and accessory facial nucleus and their topographic relations with the facial and abducens nuclei

The development of the motor trigeminal complex and accessory facial nucleus was traced in 23 human fetuses (seven and one-half to 21 weeks, menstrual age; 20.7–p177.5 mm CR length) and a 75-day infant both by graphic reconstructions and cytologic methods. Positional relationships with the facial and abducens nuclei were determined. Differentiation begins at the junction of the posterior trigeminal and accessory facial nuclei (level of pontine flexure) and proceeds rostralward in the motor trigeminal complex and caudalward in the facial complex. The neurons that differentiate earliest complete their migration first and migrate the least from their original position. Thus the posterior trigeminal nucleus is most dorsally and the accessory facial cell groups are most medially located. Migration of the trigeminal complex is completed by eitht weeks and of the facial complex by ten to ten and one-half weeks. Correlations are made between the differentiation of the motor neurons of the trigeminal and facial nerves and: (1) the development of the muscles that they have been postulated to supply; (2) the known function of these muscles; (3) the development of reflex activity in these muscles; (4) the mammalian experimental and human pathologic evidence for their innervation. These correlations support the view that the posterior trigeminal nucleus supplies the anterior belly and the accessory facial nucleus the posterior belly of the digastric muscle and that the posterodorsal part of the motor trigeminal nucleus innervates the mylohyoid muscle. Furthermore, the sequence of differentiation of the trigeminal complex indicates that the ventral trigeminal muscles (floor of the mouth) are represented primarily dorsally and posteriorly in the trigeminal complex and the progressively more dorsal muscles increasingly farther ventrally and anteriorly. The three subdivisions of the motor trigeminal nucleus are probably related to the three major embryonic muscle masses that they supply early in development. Because the inconstant subgroups in the three subdivisions appear when the complixity of reflex activity increases, perhaps they represent functional units rather than single muscles. The position of the abducens nucleus varies widely and no consistent migration cephalad occurs. It may reach caudal motor trigeminal nuclear levels early in fetal life or remain at caudal levels of the facial nucleus postnatally. No accessory abducens nucleus was identified. The neurons in the location allocated to it in some mammals develop from the common cell column between the motor trigeminal nucleus and the facial nucleus and constitute the accessory facial nucleus. Possible explanations for the widely different number of cells in the posterior trigeminal and accessory facial nuclei are discussed.     

The location of brainstem neurons which project bilaterally to the spinal trigeminal nuclei as demonstrated by the double fluorescent retrograde tracer technique

Cells with possible dual projections to both spinal trigeminal nuclei were identified in the rat brainstem following separate injections of different retrogradely transported markers into the right and left spinal trigeminal nucleus. The greatest number of double-labeled cells was located in the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis. Several double-marked cells were also observed in the nucleus raphe magnus, the nucleus paragigantocellularis and the periaqueductal gray. These results suggest that some cells in the above brainstem nuclei may have a bilateral modulating effect on the spinal trigeminal nuclei.     

The location of brainstem neurons which project bilaterally to the spinal trigeminal nuclei as demonstrated by the double flourescent retrograde tracer technique

Cells with possible dual projections to both spinal trigeminal nuclei were identified in the rat brainstem following separate injections of different retrogradely transported markers into the right and left spinal trigeminal nucleus. The greatest number of double-labeled cells was located in the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis. Several double-marked were also observed in the nucleus raphe magnus, the nucleus paragigantocellularis and the periaqueductal gray. These results suggest that some cells in the above brainstem nuclei may have a bilateral modulating effect on the spinal trigeminal nuclei.     

Brain stem projections to the facial nucleus of the rat

Horseradish peroxidase was injected into the medial and lateral columns of the facial nucleus of the rat. Following medial injections, cells were labelled by retrograde transport in the ipsilateral spinal trigeminal nucleus (caudalis) both medial vestibular nuclei, contralateral midbrain reticular formation and nucleus of the lateral lemniscus. The periaqueductal grey, interstitial nucleus and nucleus of Darkschewitch were also labelled ipsilaterally. Injections into the lateral column of the facial nucleus labelled the spinal trigeminal nucleus (oralis) and parabrachial nuclei ipsilaterally and the Darkschewitch and red nuclei contralaterally.     

Trigeminal mesencephalic neurons innervating functionally identified muscle spindles and involved in the monosynaptic stretch reflex of the lateral pterygoid muscle of the guinea pig

Location of the neurons in the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus innervating stretch receptors of the lateral pterygoid muscle and the mode of their synaptic connection on the lateral pterygoid motoneurons of the guinea pig were studied physiologically as well as morphologically, in comparison with the trigeminal mesencephalic neurons innervating muscle spindles in the superficial masseter muscle, with the following results: stimulation of the caudal half of the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus evoked monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the ipsilateral lateral pterygoid motoneurons. Stimulation of the lateral pterygoid nerve directly evoked spike potentials in the neurons located in the caudal half of the ipsilateral trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus, which responded with increased firing to stretch, and with silent period to twitch, of the ipsilateral lateral pterygoid muscle. Averaging of intracellular potentials of the lateral pterygoid motoneurons with extracellular spike potentials of these trigeminal mesencephalic neurons revealed excitatory postsynaptic potentials after a monosynaptic latency, but no inhibitory postsynaptic potentials. Injection of horseradish peroxidase into the lateral pterygoid muscle labeled 15-20 cells in the caudal half of the ipsilateral trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus, while 174-228 cells retrogradely labeled by horseradish peroxidase were found throughout the whole rostrocaudal extent of the ipsilateral trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus following injection of horseradish peroxidase into the masseter muscle. It was concluded that neurons in the caudal half of the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus send their peripheral processes to stretch receptors, presumably muscle spindles, in the ipsilateral lateral pterygoid muscle and that their central processes have excitatory synapses on ipsilateral lateral pterygoid motoneurons, thus comprising the afferent limb of a monosynaptic stretch reflex arc of the lateral pterygoid muscle of the guinea pig.     

An HRP study of the central projections from primary sensory neurons innervating the rat masseter muscle

Retrograde and transganglionic transport of horseradish peroxidase has been used to study the cell bodies of origin and the central projections of neurons innervating the rat masseter muscle. Labeled cell bodies were observed both in the trigeminal ganglion and in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus. Major central projections from mesencephalic trigeminal neurons were traced to the supratrigeminal nucleus and to the brainstem reticular formation. Smaller projections from these neurons could be followed to the borders of the solitary tract and hypoglossal nuclei as well as to lamina V of nucleus caudalis and corresponding areas in the dorsal horn at C₁−C₂ spinal cord segments. Labeling from trigeminal ganglion neurons was observed close to the trigeminal tract in all subdivisions of the trigeminal sensory nuclear complex and in the dorsal horn lamina I at C₁ and C₂ levels.