Treatment options in irritable bowel syndrome

The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is part of the spectrum of functional bowel disorders characterised by a diverse consortium of abdominal symptoms including abdominal pain, altered bowel function (bowel frequency and/or constipation), bloating, abdominal distension, the sensation of incomplete evacuation and the increased passage of mucus. It is not surprising therefore that no single, unifying mechanism has as yet been put forward to explain symptom production in IBS. The currently favoured model includes both central and end-organ components which may be combined to create an integrated hypothesis incorporating psychological factors (stress, distress, affective disorder) with end-organ dysfunction (motility disorder, visceral hypersensitivity) possibly aggravated by sub-clinical inflammation as a residuum of an intestinal infection. There is currently no universally effective therapy for IBS. Standard therapy generally involves a symptom-directed approach; anti-diarrhoeal agents for bowel frequency, soluble fibre or laxatives for constipation and smooth muscle relaxants and anti-spasmodics for pain. New drug development has focused predominantly on agents that modify the effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the gut, principally the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists for painful diarrhoea predominant IBS and 5-HT(4) agonists for constipation predominant IBS. More speculative new therapeutic approaches include anti-inflammatory agents, antibiotics, probiotics, antagonists of CCK1 receptors, tachykinins and other novel neuronal receptors.     

Serotonin receptors and their role in the pathophysiology and therapy of irritable bowel syndrome

Background

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional disorder of the gastrointestinal tract characterized by abdominal discomfort, pain and changes in bowel habits, often associated with psychological/psychiatric disorders. It has been suggested that the development of IBS may be related to the body’s response to stress, which is one of the main factors that can modulate motility and visceral perception through the interaction between brain and gut (brain–gut axis). The present review will examine and discuss the role of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) receptor subtypes in the pathophysiology and therapy of IBS.

Methods

Search of the literature published in English using the PubMed database.

Results

Several lines of evidence indicate that 5-HT and its receptor subtypes are likely to have a central role in the pathophysiology of IBS. 5-HT released from enterochromaffin cells regulates sensory, motor and secretory functions of the digestive system through the interaction with different receptor subtypes. It has been suggested that pain signals originate in intrinsic primary afferent neurons and are transmitted by extrinsic primary afferent neurons. Moreover, IBS is associated with abnormal activation of central stress circuits, which results in altered perception during visceral stimulation.

Conclusions

Altered 5-HT signaling in the central nervous system and in the gut contributes to hypersensitivity in IBS. The therapeutic effects of 5-HT agonists/antagonists in IBS are likely to be due also to the ability to modulate visceral nociception in the central stress circuits. Further studies are needed in order to develop an optimal treatment.     

Drugs acting on serotonin receptors for the treatment of functional GI disorders

In the gut, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine: 5-HT) exerts a variety of effects on intrinsic enteric neurons, extrinsic afferents, enterocytes and smooth muscle cells, which are related to the expression of multiple 5-HT receptor types and subtypes regulating motility, vascular tone, secretion and perception. Agonists and antagonists at 5-HT receptors have gained access to the market for the two major variants of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a functional disorder characterized by abdominal pain associated with diarrhea and/or constipation in the absence of any organic abnormality. Indeed, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist alosetron is available in the US market for the treatment of women with severe, diarrhea-predominant IBS (D-IBS) refractory to conventional therapy, whereas tegaserod, a partial 5-HT4 receptor agonist, has been approved by the FDA and other regulatory agencies for the treatment of women with constipation-predominant IBS (C-IBS) or functional constipation. This review is mainly intended to discuss the role of non-neuronal (paracrine) and neuronal 5-HT in the pathophysiology of functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), such as IBS and functional dyspepsia, and the mechanisms through which drugs acting on 5-HT receptors regulate visceral motility, perception and secretion in these two conditions.     

Role of serotonin in gastrointestinal physiology and pathology

Serotonin is one of the most abundant molecules in the gastrointestinal tract and it plays a crucial role in the regulation of several physiological functions, such as motility, secretion and visceral sensitivity. Besides this well documented physiological role, increasing evidence supports the concept that 5-HT is directly involved in pathological mechanisms, as well as the modulation of immune/inflammatory responses within the gut. The wide range of pathophysiological actions exerted by 5-HT are mediated by several different serotonergic receptor types and subtypes. Depending on the receptor bound and its localization, 5-HT evokes different and, sometimes, opposite responses. Therapeutic interventions aiming at modulating 5-HT signaling are mainly focused on the development of receptor agonists/antagonists, characterized by high affinity and selectivity for serotonergic receptors in the gut, to avoid the presence of adverse effects in the brain, where 5-HT is important in control mood. This review summarizes the vast current knowledge on 5-HT as a physiological mediator and analyzes the increasing body of literature describing 5-HT signaling abnormalities in functional and inflammatory disorders both in animal models and in humans. Finally, an overview on the therapeutic agents used in clinical practice is provided.     

Visceral hypersensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome

Altered central processing, abnormal gastrointestinal motility and visceral hypersensitivity may be possible major pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). These factors affect each other and are probably associated with development of IBS symptoms. It has been confirmed that lower pain threshold to colonic distention was observed in most of patients with IBS than healthy subjects. We have investigated pain perception of the descending colon among different subtypes of IBS. There was no difference in pain threshold to colonic distention between IBS with diarrhea and constipation. Some brain regions such as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) may play a major role for generating pain and/or pain-related emotion in humans. IBS patients showed greater activation in the perigenual ACC during painful rectal distention compared with healthy subjects. Inflammation, stress and the combination of both stimuli can induce significant increase in visceral sensitivity in animal models. Serotonin (5-HT) can modulate visceral perception. It has been thought that 5-HT(3) receptors may play an important role for conveying visceral sensation from the gut. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) may also modulate visceral pain hypersensitivity in IBS. CRH receptor-1 antagonist significantly prevented an increase in gut sensitivity in rats. It has been demonstrated that non-specific CRH receptor antagonist α-helical CRH significantly reduced abdominal pain score during gut stimulus in patients with IBS. In conclusion, visceral hypersensitivity is common in IBS patients and probably plays a major role in development of the symptoms and both central and peripheral factors may enhance the pain sensitivity.     

Functional dyspepsia: drugs for new (and old) therapeutic targets

The therapeutic management of functional dyspepsia remains a major challenge for the gastroenterologist. Current therapies available are based on putative underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, including gastric acid sensitivity, slow gastric emptying and Helicobacter pylori infection, but only a small proportion of patients achieve symptomatic benefit from these therapeutic approaches. Relatively novel mechanistic concepts under testing include impaired gastric accomodation, visceral hypersensitivity, and central nervous system dysfunction. Serotonergic modulators (e.g. the 5-HT4 agonist tegaserod, the 5-HT3 antagonist alosetron and the 5-HT1P agonist sumatriptan), CCK-1 antagonists (e.g. dexloxiglumide), opioid agonists (e.g. asimadoline), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (e.g dextromethorphan), neurokinin antagonists (e.g. talnetant), capsaicin-like agents and antidepressants are among the agents currently under investigation. It seems unlikely, however, that targeting a single mechanism with an individual drug will result in complete symptom remission in most cases.     

New developments in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common gastrointestinal conditions encountered by general practitioners, and it accounts for a great deal of the workload of gastroenterologists in secondary care. Research to date indicates that several factors contribute to the development of IBS, of which disturbed gastrointestinal motility, altered visceral perception and psychosocial factors are regarded as the three most important mechanisms interacting in the development of this disorder. Most pharmacological research has been based on these insights. Several agents capable of modulating either motility or sensitivity are currently under investigation. Potential drugs in the treatment of diarrhoea-predominant IBS are the more selective antispasmodics, such as the M3-receptor antagonists (e.g. zamifenacin, darifenacin). In constipation-predominant IBS the colokinetic effects of the selective 5HT4 agonists prucalopride and tegaserod are of great interest. Since altered visceral perception is thought to play an important role in the genesis of abdominal pain and bloating in many patients with IBS, new drugs are targeted at modulating the sensitivity, such as 5HT3 antagonists (e.g. alosetron), kappa-agonists (e.g. fedotozine) and somatostatin analogues. Furthermore, psychosocial factors should not be overlooked, since these appear to be of great influence on the clinical outcome of IBS.     

New concepts of irritable bowel syndrome

Significant recent advances in basic and clinical science have improved our understanding of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Sensory abnormalities, particularly visceral hypersensitivity after sensitizing stimulation, indicate neural dysfunction in patients with IBS. This dysfunction could be mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate or calcium gene-related peptide receptors in the spinal cord. The stress response in the gut is augmented in IBS, which may be related to hypothalamic release of corticotropin-releasing factor. Postinfectious IBS may be related to psychologic factors that allow persistent inflammation. Finally, functional brain imaging has shown augmented central nervous system responses to visceral pain in IBS, particularly in the prefrontal cortex. Low-dose tricyclic antidepressants are useful to control symptoms, and the new serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists show promise for symptom control.     

Evolving concepts in functional gastrointestinal disorders: promising directions for novel pharmaceutical treatments

In recent years there has been an increasing appreciation of the complexity of functional gastrointestinal disorders. These represent a spectrum of conditions which may affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract in which there appears to be dysregulation of visceral function and afferent sensation and a strong association with emotional factors and stress. There is a clear psychological dimension, with up to 60% of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients reported to have psychological co-morbidities and altered pain perception is also common in comparison with control populations. The role of the enteric nervous system, the sensory pathways and the brain as well as the influence of the latter on sympathetic and parasympathetic outflow have likewise attracted increasing interest and have led to exciting new methods to study their complex interactions. The concept of low-grade inflammation, such as might occur after infection, acting as a trigger for neuromuscular dysfunction has also led to the broad integrative hypotheses that help to explain the biopsychosocial dimensions seen in functional gastrointestinal disease. The multi-component model places a major emphasis on neurogastroenterology and enteric and neuro-immune interactions where new approaches to pharmacotherapy lie. Drugs may affect motility, visceral sensation and other aspects of gut function such as secretion or absorption. More particularly, however, has been the search for and attempts to influence important mediators of these primary gut functions. Such targets include serotonin and selected 5-HT receptors, which are involved in gut motility, visceral sensation and other aspects of gut function, CCK receptors which are involved in the mediation of pain in the gut and nociception in the CNS, opioid receptors involved in pain in the brain, spinal cord and periphery, muscarinic M3-receptors, substance P and neurokinin A and B receptors which are involved in motor adaptation and pain transmission in association with inflammation, gabba receptors involved in nociception and cannabinoid receptors which are involved in the control of acetyl choline release in the gut. With a better understanding of the structures and pathways involved in visceral perception and hyperalgesia, in the CNS, spinal cord and the gut and new pharmacological tools we will be better able to elucidate the neuropharmacology of visceral perception and its relationship to gut dysfunction. It is likely that there will be multiple therapeutic options based on the spectrum of abnormalities capable of causing the spectrum of symptoms of functional gastrointestinal disorders in any individual patient.     

Impact of psychological stress on irritable bowel syndrome

Psychological stress is an important factor for the development of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). More and more clinical and experimental evidence showed that IBS is a combination of irritable bowel and irritable brain. In the present review we discuss the potential role of psychological stress in the pathogenesis of IBS and provide comprehensive approaches in clinical treatment. Evidence from clinical and experimental studies showed that psychological stresses have marked impact on intestinal sensitivity, motility, secretion and permeability, and the underlying mechanism has a close correlation with mucosal immune activation, alterations in central nervous system, peripheral neurons and gastrointestinal microbiota. Stress-induced alterations in neuro-endocrine-immune pathways acts on the gut-brain axis and microbiota-gut-brain axis, and cause symptom flare-ups or exaggeration in IBS. IBS is a stress-sensitive disorder, therefore, the treatment of IBS should focus on managing stress and stress-induced responses. Now, non-pharmacological approaches and pharmacological strategies that target on stress-related alterations, such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, miscellaneous agents, 5-HT synthesis inhibitors, selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, and specific 5-HT receptor antagonists or agonists have shown a critical role in IBS management. A integrative approach for IBS management is a necessary.     

New directions in the irritable bowel syndrome

The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is an umbrella for the diagnosis of heterogeneous conditions that are awaiting better identification of specific manometric causes. This article focuses on the concept that future therapy for IBS will rely on identification of subgroups and in turn tailor the specific therapeutic approaches to an appreciation of the pathophysiology and symptom predominance of these subgroups. Future therapies will rely on the following principles: (1) prokinetic agents to coordinate upper gastrointestinal and colonic motility as well as improve the propulsive nature of colonic contractions; (2) gastrointestinal hormone agonists such as erythromycin and antagonists such as sandostatin and cholecystokinin antagonists; (3) spasmolytic therapy incorporating calcium channel blocking and anticholinergic agents; (4) inhibition of ovulatory cycle changes in circulating concentrations of gonadal hormones in women, who tend to dominate the IBS population; (5) incorporation of concepts relating to the role of subtypes of 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors in control of neural and myogenic function; (6) reassessment of food intolerance and sensitivity; and (7) incorporation of concepts relating to psychologic profiles and psychologic treatment approaches. IBS is a rich and fertile area for application of the exciting new pharmacologic advances relating to gastrointestinal smooth-muscle and neural innervation of the gut. Improvement in the understanding and treatment of IBS will be one of the major accomplishments of this decade.     

Management of the irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common disorder diagnosed by gastroenterologists and one of the more common ones encountered in general practice. The overall prevalence rate is similar (approximately 10%) in most industrialized countries; the illness has a large economic impact on health care use and indirect costs, chiefly through absenteeism. IBS is a biopsychosocial disorder in which 3 major mechanisms interact: psychosocial factors, altered motility, and/or heightened sensory function of the intestine. Subtle inflammatory changes suggest a role for inflammation, especially after infectious enteritis, but this has not yet resulted in changes in the approach to patient treatment. Treatment of patients is based on positive diagnosis of the symptom complex, limited exclusion of underlying organic disease, and institution of a therapeutic trial. If patient symptoms are intractable, further investigations are needed to exclude specific motility or other disorders. Symptoms fluctuate over time; treatment is often restricted to times when patients experience symptoms. Symptomatic treatment includes supplementing fiber to achieve a total intake of up to 30 g in those with constipation, those taking loperamide or other opioids for diarrhea, and those taking low-dose antidepressants or infrequently using antispasmodics for pain. Older conventional therapies do not address pain in IBS. Behavioral psychotherapy and hypnotherapy are also being evaluated. Novel approaches include alosetron; a 5-HT(3) antagonist, tegaserod, a partial 5-HT(4) agonist, kappa-opioid agonists, and neurokinin antagonists to address the remaining challenging symptoms of pain, constipation, and bloating. Understanding the brain-gut axis is key to the eventual development of effective therapies for IBS.     

5-羟色胺与肠易激综合征的内脏高敏感性

肠易激综合征（IBS）是一种常见的功能性胃肠病，由于缺少明确的结构和生化改变，其临床诊断和治疗均有～定难度。目前认为内脏高敏感性和胃肠道动力异常是IBS的病理生理基础，近年来探索内脏高敏感性的形成机制成为IBS研究的热点。研究显示5-羟色胺（5-HT）可能与内脏高敏感性相关。5-HT相关制剂用于IBS的治疗已取得一定疗效。5-HT在内脏高敏感性形成机制中作用的研究将有助于IBS病理生理机制的阐明和临床新药的开发。     

Recent insights into digestive motility in functional dyspepsia

Functional gastrointestinal disorders, such as functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome, are common pathologies of the gut. FD is a clinical syndrome defined as chronic or recurrent pain or discomfort of unknown origin in the upper abdomen. The pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for FD have not been fully elucidated, but new ideas regarding its pathophysiology and the significance of the pathophysiology with respect to the symptom pattern of FD have emerged. In particular, there is growing interest in alterations in gastric motility, such as accommodation to a meal or gastric emptying, and visceral sensation in FD. The mechanisms underlying impaired gastroduodenal motor function are unclear, but possible factors include abnormal neurohormonal function, autonomic dysfunction, visceral hypersensitivity to acid or mechanical distention, Helicobacter pylori infection, acute gastrointestinal infection, psychosocial comorbidity, and stress. Although the optimum treatment for FD is not yet clearly established, acid-suppressive drugs, prokinetic agents, eradication of H. pylori, and antidepressants have been widely used in the management of patients with FD. The therapeutic efficacy of prokinetics such as itopride hydrochloride and mosapride citrate in the treatment of FD is supported by the results of relatively large and well-controlled studies. In addition, recent research has yielded new therapeutic agents and modalities for dysmotility in FD, including agonists/antagonists of various sensorimotor receptors, activation of the nitrergic pathway, kampo medicine, acupuncture, and gastric electric stimulation. This review discusses recent research on the pathophysiology of and treatment options for FD, with special attention given to digestive dysmotility.     

Regulation of the serotonin transporter in the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome

Serotonin(5-HT) and the serotonin transporter(SERT) have earned a tremendous amount of attention regarding the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome(IBS). Considering that enteric 5-HT is responsible for the secretion, motility and perception of the bowel, the involvement of altered enteric 5-HT metabolism in the pathogenesis of IBS has been elucidated. Higher 5-HT availability is commonly associated with depressed SERT mR NA in patients with IBS compared with healthy controls. The expression difference of SERT between IBS patients and healthy controls might suggest that SERT plays an essential role in IBS pathogenesis, and SERT was expected to be a novel therapeutic target for IBS. Progress in this area has begun to illuminate the complex regulatory mechanisms of SERT in the etiology of IBS. In this article, current insights regarding the regulation of SERT in IBS are provided, including aspects of SERT gene polymorphisms, microR NAs, immunity and inflammation, gut microbiota, growth factors, among others. Potential SERT-directed therapies for IBS are also described. The potential regulators of SERT are of clinical importance and are important for better understanding IBS pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies.     

混合型5-HT_4受体激动剂/5-HT_3受体拮抗剂治疗肠易激综合征的系统评价

目的:系统评价混合型5-HT4受体激动剂/5-HT3受体拮抗剂(西沙必利、莫沙必利、伦扎必利)治疗肠易激综合征(IBS)的有效性和安全性.方法:采用Cochrane协作网推荐的方法,对纳入的全世界范围内有关西沙必利、莫沙必利、伦扎必利治疗肠易激综合征的8个随机对照试验(n=2841)进行系统评价.结果:Meta分析结果显示,西沙必利对IBS总体症状[RR=0.91,95%CI(0.58,1.43)]、腹痛症状[RR=0.90,95%CI(0.72,1.11)]及便秘症状(RR=0.91,95%CI(0.74,1.12)的疗效均不优于安慰剂.伦扎必利1mg/d组和2mg/d组对IBS总体症状的疗效不优于安慰剂[RR=0.95,95%CI(0.67,1.35);RR=0.79,95%CI(0.67,1.17)],伦扎必利4mg/d组对IBS总体症状的疗效优于安慰剂[67.8%vs73.9%,RR=0.91,95%CI(0.86,0.96)].西沙必利[RR=1.52,95%CI(0.58,3.99)]和伦扎必利[RR=1.11,95%CI(0.98,1.24)]的药物不良事件发生率与安慰剂无显著性差异.结论:伦扎...     

5-羟色胺信号系统与肠易激综合征

5-羟色胺(5-HT)是参与调节胃肠道运动和分泌功能的重要神经递质,5-HT信号系统异常可导致胃肠动力及分泌功能异常、内脏高敏感性,与IBS的病理生理改变相关。此文旨在探讨5-HT信号系统在IBS肠道运动和感觉的调节、脑肠轴异常、精神症状、神经保护等方面的作用。     

Update in the therapeutic management of irritable bowel syndrome.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a remarkably frequent disorder that leads to relevant impairment in patients' quality of life. Four mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of IBS: altered intestinal motility; increased visceral sensitivity; disturbed intestinal reflexes (intrinsic and extrinsic), and psychological disorders. The close relationship between the central nervous system and the enteric nervous system (the brain-gut axis) is the basis of the actual research on IBS therapy. It is conceivable that in the near future a better understanding of IBS pathophysiology will help us to tailor treatment for different IBS patients. At the moment, the subclassification of the diverse patterns of symptomatology allows the adjustment of treatments for IBS according to the clinical predominance of each patient. Dietary modifications like fiber supplementation, antidiarrheal agents and antispasmodic drugs are the basis of the current treatment of IBS and depend on the predominant symptom (constipation, diarrhea or pain, respectively). If severe pain is present, antidepressant agents are an appropriate alternative. However, the scientific evidence supporting this current therapeutic approach is limited. Visceral analgesics and serotonin agonists and antagonists may play an important therapeutic role in the near future. However, it is not likely that one single treatment will help every IBS patient and many of them will need a more complex approach with multidisciplinary therapy (diet, psychotherapy, medications).     

Role of antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a long-lasting, relapsing disorder characterized by abdominal pain/discomfort and altered bowel habits. Intestinal motility impairment and visceral hypersensitivity are the key factors among its multifactorial pathogenesis, both of which require effective treatment. Voltage-gated calcium channels mediate smooth muscle contraction and endocrine secretion and play important roles in neuronal transmission. Antispasmodics are a group of drugs that have been used in the treatment of IBS for decades. Alverine citrate, a spasmolytic, decreases the sensitivity of smooth muscle contractile proteins to calcium, and it is a selective 5-HT_1A receptor antagonist. Alverine, in combination with simethicone, has been demonstrated to effectively reduce abdominal pain and discomfort in a large placebo-controlled trial. Mebeverine is a musculotropic agent that potently blocks intestinal peristalsis. Non-placebo-controlled trials have shown positive effects of mebeverine in IBS regarding symptom control; nevertheless, in recent placebo-controlled studies, mebeverine did not exhibit superiority over placebo. Otilonium bromide is poorly absorbed from the GI tract, where it acts locally as an L-type calcium channel blocker, an antimuscarinic and a tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist. Otilonium has effectively reduced pain and improved defecation alterations in placebo-controlled trials in IBS patients. Pinaverium bromide is also an L-type calcium channel blocker that acts locally in the GI tract. Pinaverium improves motility disorders and consequently reduces stool problems in IBS patients. Phloroglucinol and trimethylphloroglucinol are non-specific antispasmodics that reduced pain in IBS patients in a placebo-controlled trial. Antispasmodics have excellent safety profiles. T-type calcium channel blockers can abolish visceral hypersensitivity in animal models, which makes them potential candidates for the development of novel therapeutic agents in the treatment of IBS.     

Motility disorders in the irritable bowel syndrome

Specific abnormalities of colonic and small bowel motility are identifiable and associated with symptoms in IBS. Characteristic abnormalities in colonic motility include a prolonged increase in 3-cycles/min colonic motor activity after a meal, an exaggerated increase in 3-cycles/min motor activity in response to stressors and CCK, and increased visceral sensitivity and motor activity in response to balloon distention. Symptoms in patients with IBS correlate in some cases with the abnormal gastrocolonic response and with pain induced by distention at various sites in the colon. Small bowel motility abnormalities identified reproducibly in IBS include an increase in daytime jejunal DCCs, an increase in daytime ileal PPCs, and more frequent cycling of daytime MMCs (in diarrhea-predominant IBS only). DCCs and PPCs are strongly associated with symptoms in IBS, and PPCs associated with altered ileocecal transit may be an important mechanism of symptoms in some patients with IBS. Esophageal and gastroduodenal motility abnormalities are inconsistently identified in IBS, and most symptoms in IBS appear to be secondary to small bowel or colonic dysfunction. Because of the paroxysmal nature of these motor abnormalities in IBS, prolonged motility recordings are required to better understand the pathophysiology of this syndrome. Patients with IBS may have altered visceral sensation and changes in afferent reflex mechanisms that modulate GI motility. These patients do not have a generalized increase in pain perception, but may have a distinct sensitivity to visceral afferent stimulation in both gastrointestinal and other viscera. Whether the altered "setpoint" to visceral afferent stimulation in IBS is intrinsic to the smooth muscle of viscera or secondary to CNS and ANS modulation is not known. Many of the symptoms and abnormalities of small bowel and colonic motility in IBS probably result from these changes in afferent sensation and reflex mechanisms. These findings support the concept that IBS is an abnormality of intestinal motility in conjunction with a "sensitive" gut.