共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Savio G. Barreto Sanjay Pandanaboyana Natasha Ironside John A. Windsor 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(7):573-579
Background
Margin status is the main surgical determinant of long-term outcome in pancreatic cancer. Intraoperative frozen section (IOFS) detects microscopic positive margins at a stage when margin revision is possible. The aim of this study was to determine if IOFS driven-revision of pancreatic resection margin(s) improves overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer.Methods
A systematic review of major reference databases was undertaken. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on initial FS (FSR0 for negative margin and FSR1 for positive microscopic margin) and final Permanent Section report (PSR0 for negative margin and PSR1 for positive microscopic margin): Group 1 (FSR0 → PSR0), Group 2 (FSR1 → PSR0), and Group 3 (FSR1 → PSR1). Patients in Groups 2 and 3 had surgical revision of the FSR1 margin. Data was meta-analysed.Results
4 studies included in the final analysis. No difference in OS and incidence of lymph node metastases between Groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.590 and P = 0.410).Conclusions
IOFS-based revision of R1 pancreatic resection margin does not improve OS, even when it results in an R0 margin. This suggests that any benefit of margin revision based on FS is over-ridden by markers of more advanced or aggressive disease. 相似文献2.
Amer H. Zureikat Jeffrey Borrebach Henry A. Pitt Douglas Mcgill Melissa E. Hogg Vanessa Thompson David J. Bentrem Bruce L. Hall Herbert J. Zeh 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(7):595-602
Background
Procedural conversion rates represent an important aspect of the feasibility of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches. This study aimed to outline the rates and predictors of procedural completion/conversion for MIS hepatectomy and pancreatectomy.Methods
All 2014 ACS-NSQIP laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy and pancreatectomy procedures were identified and grouped into pure, open assist, or unplanned conversion to open. Risk adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were generated with completion (Pure) set as the primary outcome.Results
1667 (laparoscopic = 1360, robotic = 307) resections were captured. After risk adjustment, robotic DP was associated with similar open assist (relative risk ratio ?1.9%, P = 0.602), but lower unplanned conversion (?8.2%, P = 0.004) and open assist + unplanned conversion (?10.1%, P = 0.015) compared to laparoscopic DP; while robotic PD was associated with lower open assist (?22.2%, P < 0.001), unplanned conversions (?15%, P = 0.006) and open assist + unplanned conversions (?37.2, P < 0.001) compared to laparoscopic PD. The robotic and laparoscopic approaches to hepatectomy were not associated with differences in pure MIS completion rates (P = NS) after risk adjustment.Conclusions
The robotic approach to pancreatectomy was associated with higher rates of pure MIS completion compared to laparoscopy, whereas no difference in MIS completion rates was noted for robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy. 相似文献3.
James M. Halle-Smith Eduardo Vinuela Rachel M. Brown James Hodson Zergham Zia Simon R. Bramhall Ravi Marudanayagam Robert P. Sutcliffe Darius F. Mirza Paolo Muiesan John Isaac Keith J. Roberts 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(8):727-734
Background
Evidence associates various biometric and histological variables such as steatosis and absence of fibrosis as risk factors for post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Following distal pancreatectomy (DP), the association between these factors and POPF is less clear. This study of patients, drawn from the same background population, undergoing PD or DP at a single centre is a comparative study of the risk factors for POPF after these two operations.Methods
Associations between POPF and patient characteristics, pre-operative blood tests, data from pre-operative computed tomography (CT) imaging, assessment of histological steatosis and fibrosis were explored.Results
26/107 (24%) and 26/90 (29%) patients developed POPF after PD and DP respectively. Absence of fibrosis was associated with POPF (p < 0.001) after PD and its presence correlated with pancreatic duct width (p < 0.001). Steatosis was not associated with POPF (p = 0.910). Multivariable analysis showed pancreatic duct width (p = 0.016) and fibrosis (p = 0.025) to be independent predictors of POPF after PD. The only variable associated with POPF after DP was underlying pathology (p = 0.005).Conclusion
Pancreatic duct width is the most important variable related to POPF after PD and is correlated with fibrosis. Steatosis was not related to POPF. In contrast, after DP POPF appears to be related to the underlying disease. 相似文献4.
Pim B. Olthof Robert J.S. Coelen Jimme K. Wiggers Bas Groot Koerkamp Massimo Malago Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro Stefan A. Topp Marco Vivarelli Luca A. Aldrighetti Ricardo Robles Campos Karl J. Oldhafer William R. Jarnagin Thomas M. van Gulik 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(5):381-387
Introduction
Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) entails high-risk surgery with postoperative mortality reported up to 18%, even in specialized centers. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of PHC patients who underwent associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) to patients who underwent resection without ALPPS.Methods
All patients who underwent ALPPS for PHC were identified from the international ALPPS registry and matched controls were selected from a standard resection cohort from two centers based on future remnant liver size. Outcomes included morbidity, mortality, and overall survival.Results
ALPPS for PHC was associated with 48% (14/29) 90-day mortality. 90-day mortality was 13% in 257 patients who underwent major liver resection for PHC without ALPPS. The 29 ALPPS patients were matched to 29 patients resected without ALPPS, with similar future liver remnant volume (P = 0.480). Mortality in the matched control group was 24% (P = 0.100) and median OS was 27 months, comparted to 6 months after ALPPS (P = 0.064).Discussion
Outcomes of ALPPS for PHC appear inferior compared to standard extended resections in high-risk patients. Therefore, portal vein embolization should remain the preferred method to increase future remnant liver volume in patients with PHC. ALPPS is not recommended for PHC. 相似文献5.
Xiaobin Feng Yongjie Su Shuguo Zheng Feng Xia Kuansheng Ma Jun Yan Xiaowu Li Wei Tang Shuguang Wang Ping Bie Jiahong Dong 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(8):667-674
Background
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of anatomic resection (AR) versus non-anatomic resection (NAR) on recurrence rates in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods
Eligible patients were randomized to AR or NAR from January 2006 to July 2007 at a single center. The primary outcome was the 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, time to first recurrence, 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS, and overall survival (OS).Results
Fifty-three (51%) and 52 (50%) patients underwent NAR and AR, respectively. A larger proportion of patients achieved margins ≥20 mm in the AR group (52% vs. 30%; P = 0.023). Complications (blood loss, transfusion requirement, and hospital stay) were similar between the two groups. Median follow-up was 33 (range, 2–77) months. Incidence of local recurrence at 2 years was 30% and 59% in the AR and NAR groups, respectively. Median time to first local recurrence in the AR group was significantly longer than in the NAR group (53 vs. 10 months, P = 0.010). There was no difference in overall RFS between the two groups (P = 0.290).Discussion
AR decreased the 2-year local recurrence rate and increased the time to first local recurrence compared to NAR in patients with HCC. 相似文献6.
Daisuke Hokuto Takeo Nomi Satoshi Yasuda Chihiro Kawaguchi Takahiro Yoshikawa Kohei Ishioka Shinsaku Obara Takatsugu Yamada Hiromichi Kanehiro 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(4):359-364
Background
Prophylactic drainage after liver resection remains a common practice amongst hepatic surgeons. However, there is little information about the optimal timing of drain removal.Methods
From April 2008 to December 2012 (conventional group), the drains were removed based on the treating surgeon's view. From January 2013 to April 2016 (ERP group), the drains were removed on POD 3 if the bile concentration of the drain discharge was less than three times the serum bilirubin on POD 3, and the amount of drain discharge was <500 ml on POD 3. The postoperative outcomes of the two groups were compared using one-to-one propensity score-matching analysis.Results
One hundred nine patients were extracted from ERP group (n = 226) and conventional group (n = 246). The time to drain removal was significantly shorter in the ERP group than in the conventional group (3 days vs. 5 days, P < 0.001). The frequency of delayed bile leakage or the appearance of symptomatic abdominal fluid collection after drain removal did not differ between the two groups (3% vs. 4%, P = 0.791).Conclusion
Drain removal on POD 3 based on the volume and bile concentration is safe. 相似文献7.
Quyen D. Chu Meijiao Zhou Prakash Peddi Kaelen L. Medeiros Gazi B. Zibari Hosein Shokouh-Amiri Xiao-Cheng Wu 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(12):1046-1057
Introduction
Although a volume-outcome relationship has been well established for pancreatectomy, little is known about differences in mortality by facility type. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of facility type on short-term and long-term survival outcomes for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatectomy and identify determinants of overall survival (OS).Methods
A cohort of 33,382 patients with Stage I–III pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1998 and 2011 were evaluated from the National Cancer Data Base. Clinicopathological, sociodemographic and treatment variables were compared among three facility types where patients received resection: (i) community cancer program (CCP), (ii) comprehensive community cancer program (CCCP), and (iii) academic research program (ARP). 5-year OS was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.Results
Despite ARP having significantly higher percentage of poorly differentiated tumors, higher T-stage tumors, more positive lymph nodes, and greater circle distance compared to the other facilities, it had the highest 5-yr OS. The 5-yr OS for CCP, CCCP, and ARP was 11.2%, 13.2%, and 16.6%, respectively (P < 0.0001) and the median survival time (months) was 12.4, 15.6 and 19.1, respectively.Conclusion
Patients receiving pancreatic resection at an ARP yielded a higher 5-year OS compared to CCP or CCCP. 相似文献8.
Claire L. Stevens Andrew Awad Saleh M. Abbas David A.K. Watters 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(8):653-658
Background
Surgical techniques and pre-operative patient evaluation have improved since the initial development of the Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging system. The optimal treatment for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≥5 cm remains unclear. The aim of this study was to review the long-term survival outcomes of hepatic resection versus transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) for solitary large tumours.Methods
EMBASE, MEDLINE, Pubmed and the Cochrane database were searched for studies comparing resection with TACE for solitary HCC ≥5 cm. The primary outcome was overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years.Results
The meta-analysis combined the results of four cohort studies including 861 patients where 452 underwent hepatic resection and 409 were treated with TACE to an absence of viable tumour. The pooled HR for 3 year OS rate calculated using the random effects model was 0.60 (95% CI 0.46–0.79, p < 0.001; I2 = 54%, P = 0.087). The pooled HR for 5 year OS rate calculated using the random effects model was 0.59 (95% CI 0.43–0.81, p = 0.001; I2 = 80%, P = 0.002).Conclusion
Hepatic resection has been shown to result in greater survivability and time to disease progression than TACE for solitary HCC ≥5 cm. Where a patient is fit for surgery, has adequate liver function and a favourable tumour, resection should be considered. 相似文献9.
Michele Ghidini Gianluca Tomasello Andrea Botticelli Sandro Barni Giampietro Zabbialini Silvia Seghezzi Rodolfo Passalacqua Chiara Braconi Fausto Petrelli 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(9):741-748
Introduction
The use of adjuvant treatment (AT) in resected biliary tract cancers (BTC) is still controversial. No efficacy comparison has been performed between chemotherapy (CT) and chemoradiotherapy (CTRT). A systematic review of the available evidence regarding adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in resected BTC was performed.Methods
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published. Only studies including at least 50 patients affected by tumors of gallbladder, intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal bile ducts were considered. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival (OS).Results
Thirty studies were analyzed with a total of 22,499 patients, 3967 of whom received AC. Eleven cohorts included Western patients and 19 were Asiatic. Surgeries were classified as R0 with negative margins, R1 with positive microscopic and R2 with positive macroscopic margins. Weighted mean OS difference among experimental (AC) and control arm was 4.3 months (95% CI 0.88–7.79, P = 0.014). AC reduced the risk of death by 41% (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59, 95% CI 0.49–0.71; P < 0.001).Conclusions
AC administration gives an OS benefit in resected BTC. The results of prospective randomized studies are awaited in order to define the standard AT in BTC. 相似文献10.
Martinus J. van Amerongen Sjoerd F.M. Jenniskens Peter B. van den Boezem Jurgen J. Fütterer Johannes H.W. de Wilt 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(9):749-756
Background
Hepatic resection and ablative treatments, such as RFA are available treatment options for liver tumors. Advantages and disadvantages of these treatment options in patients with colorectal liver metastases need further evaluation. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the role of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) compared to surgery in the curative treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).Methods
A systematic search was performed from MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for studies directly comparing RFA with resection for CRLM, after which variables were evaluated.Results
RFA had significantly lower complication rates (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.26–0.75, P = 0.002) compared to resection. However, RFA showed a higher rate of any recurrence (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.15–2.40, P = 0.007), local recurrence (OR = 9.56, 95% CI = 6.85–13.35, P = 0.001), intrahepatic recurrence (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.34–2.87, P = 0.001) and extrahepatic recurrence (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 0.90–1.63, P = 0.22). Also, 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.28–3.79, P = 0.005) and overall survival (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.49–3.69, P = 0.001) were significantly lower in patients treated with RFA.Conclusions
RFA showed a significantly lower rate of complications, but also a lower survival and a higher rate of recurrence as compared to surgical resection. All the included studies were subject to possible patient selection bias and therefore randomized clinical trials are needed to accurately evaluate these treatment modalities. 相似文献11.
David G. Brauer Matthew S. Strand Dominic E. Sanford Vladimir M. Kushnir Kian-Huat Lim Daniel K. Mullady Benjamin R. Tan Andrea Wang-Gillam Ashley E. Morton Marianna B. Ruzinova Parag J. Parikh Vamsi R. Narra Kathryn J. Fowler Majella B. Doyle William C. Chapman Steven S. Strasberg William G. Hawkins Ryan C. Fields 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(2):133-139
Background & objectives
Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs) are frequently employed in cancer centers but their value has been debated. We reviewed the decision-making process and resource utilization of our MDTB to assess its utility in the management of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal tract conditions.Methods
A prospectively-collected database was reviewed over a 12-month period. The primary outcome was change in management plan as a result of case discussion. Secondary outcomes included resources required to hold MDTB, survival, and adherence to treatment guidelines.Results
Four hundred seventy cases were reviewed. MDTB resulted in a change in the proposed plan of management in 101 of 402 evaluable cases (25.1%). New plans favored obtaining additional diagnostic workup. No recorded variables were associated with a change in plan. For newly-diagnosed cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 33), survival time was not impacted by MDTB (p = .154) and adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was 100%. The estimated cost of physician time per case reviewed was $190.Conclusions
Our MDTB influences treatment decisions in a sizeable number of cases with excellent adherence to national guidelines. However, this requires significant time expenditure and may not impact outcomes. Regular assessments of the effectiveness of MDTBs should be undertaken. 相似文献12.
Clinical influence of preoperative factor XIII activity in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy
Nobuyuki Watanabe Yukihiro Yokoyama Tomoki Ebata Gen Sugawara Tsuyoshi Igami Takashi Mizuno Junpei Yamaguchi Masato Nagino 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(11):972-977
Background
The influence of decreased factor XIII (FXIII) activity on perioperative bleeding has been reported in some surgical procedures. The purposes of this study were to investigate the perioperative dynamics of FXIII in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy and to clarify the effects of low preoperative FXIII activity on intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complications.Methods
Total of 43 patients who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy were enrolled. The perioperative FXIII activities were measured, and their associations with intraoperative bleeding and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.Results
Fifteen patients (35%) had low FXIII activities (<70%, lower than the institutional normal range). The patients with preoperative FXIII activities <70% experienced significantly greater blood loss (median, 1309 mL) during surgery compared to those with FXIII levels of ≥70% (median, 710 mL) (p = 0.001). The postoperative morbidity rates, including pancreatic fistula, were comparable between the patients with FXIII activities <70% and those with FXIII activities ≥70%. The FXIII levels substantially decreased on postoperative day 1 and remained at low levels until postoperative day 7.Conclusion
Unexpectedly high proportions of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy had low preoperative FXIII activities. Preoperative FXIII deficiency may increase intraoperative bleeding but had no influence on the postoperative outcomes. 相似文献13.
Andre L. Montagnini Bård I. Røsok Horacio J. Asbun Jeffrey Barkun Marc G. Besselink Ugo Boggi Kevin C.P. Conlon Abe Fingerhut Ho-Seong Han Paul D. Hansen Melissa E. Hogg Michael L. Kendrick Chinnusamy Palanivelu Shailesh V. Shrikhande Go Wakabayashi Herbert Zeh Charles M. Vollmer David A. Kooby 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(3):182-189
Background
There is a growing body of literature pertaining to minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR). Heterogeneity in MIPR terminology, leads to confusion and inconsistency. The Organizing Committee of the State of the Art Conference on MIPR collaborated to standardize MIPR terminology.Methods
After formal literature review for “minimally invasive pancreatic surgery” term, key terminology elements were identified. A questionnaire was created assessing the type of resection, the approach, completion, and conversion. Delphi process was used to identify the level of agreement among the experts.Results
A systematic terminology template was developed based on combining the approach and resection taking into account the completion. For a solitary approach the term should combine “approach + resection” (e.g. “laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy); for combined approaches the term must combine “first approach + resection” with “second approach + reconstruction” (e.g. “laparoscopic central pancreatectomy” with “open pancreaticojejunostomy”) and where conversion has resulted the recommended term is “first approach” + “converted to” + “second approach” + “resection” (e.g. “robot-assisted” “converted to open” “pancreatoduodenectomy”)Conclusions
The guidelines presented are geared towards standardizing terminology for MIPR, establishing a basis for comparative analyses and registries and allow incorporating future surgical and technological advances in MIPR. 相似文献14.
Ryan K. Schmocker David J. Vanness Caprice C. Greenberg Jeff A. Havlena Noelle K. LoConte Jennifer M. Weiss Heather B. Neuman Glen Leverson Maureen A. Smith Emily R. Winslow 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(5):465-472
Background
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is used for pancreatic adenocarcinoma staging and obtaining a tissue diagnosis. The objective was to determine patterns of preoperative EUS and the impact on downstream treatment.Methods
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare-linked database was used to identify patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The staging period was the first staging procedure within 6 months of surgery until surgery. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with preoperative EUS. The main outcome was EUS in the staging period, with secondary outcomes including number of staging tests and time to surgery.Results
2782 patients were included, 56% were treated at an academic hospital (n = 1563). 1204 patients underwent EUS (43.3%). The factors most associated with receipt of EUS were: earlier year of diagnosis, SEER area, and a NCI or academic hospital (all p < 0.0001). EUS was associated with a longer time to surgery (17.8 days; p < 0.0001), and a higher number of staging tests (40 tests/100 patients; p < 0.0001).Conclusions
Factors most associated with receipt of EUS are geographic, temporal, and institutional, rather than clinical/disease factors. EUS is associated with a longer time to surgery and more preoperative testing, and additional study is needed to determine if EUS is overused. 相似文献15.
Jan Grendar Zeljka Jutric Julie N. Leal Chad G. Ball Kimberly Bertens Elijah Dixon Chet W. Hammill Zachary Kastenberg Pippa H. Newell Flavio Rocha Brendan Visser Ronald F. Wolf Paul D. Hansen 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(6):508-514
Background
Fistula Risk Score (FRS) is a previously developed tool to assess the risk of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).Methods
Prospectively collected databases from 4 university affiliated and non-affiliated HPB centers in United States and Canada were used. The influence of individual baseline characteristics, FRS and FRS group on CR-POPF was assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. FRS calculator performance was assessed using a C-statistic.Results
444 patients were identified. Pathology, soft pancreas texture and pancreatic duct size were associated with CR-POPF rates (p < 0.001 for each); EBL was not (p = 0.067). The negligible risk group consisted of 50 (11.3%) patients, low risk of 118 (26.6%), moderate 234 (52.7%) and high risk group of 42 (9.5%) patients. The overall rate of CR-POPF was 20%. Of the patients in the negligible risk group, 2% developed CR-POPF, 13.6% of the low risk, 23.1% moderate and 42.9% in the high risk group (p < 0.001). Overall C-statistic was 0.719.Conclusion
FRS is robust and able to stratify the risk of developing CR-POPF following PD in diverse North American academic and non-academic institutions. The FRS should be used in research and to guide clinical management of patients post PD in these institutions. 相似文献16.
Yanming Zhou Lupeng Wu Dong Xu Tao Wan Xiaoying Si 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(9):768-774
Background
Limited data are currently available to address the safety and efficacy of combined resection of the liver and inferior vena cava (IVC) for hepatic malignancies.Methods
A systematic review was performed to identify relevant studies. Pooled individual data were examined for the clinical outcome of combined resection of the liver and IVC for hepatic malignancies.Results
A total of 258 patients were described in 38 articles eligible for inclusion. Resections were performed for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) [n = 128 (50%)], intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) [n = 51 (20%)], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [n = 48 (19%)], and other pathologies [n = 31 (11%)]. There were 14 (5%) perioperative deaths. The median survival duration was 34 months, and the 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 79%, 46% and 33%, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 26% for CLM, 37% for ICC, and 30% for HCC.Conclusion
Combined resection of the liver and IVC for hepatic malignancies is safe and applicable, and offers acceptable survival outcomes. 相似文献17.
Michael E. Lidsky Paul J. Speicher Brian Ezekian Edwin W. Holt Daniel P. Nussbaum Anthony W. Castleberry Alexander Perez Theodore N. Pappas 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(6):547-556
Background
Outcomes following the inability to control the cystic duct due to a hostile triangle of Calot during cholecystectomy remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of subtotal cholecystectomy, with attention to the necessity for secondary interventions.Methods
Sixteen thousand five hundred ninety six cholecystectomies from January 2002 to August 2014 were reviewed, identifying patients managed with subtotal cholecystectomy, defined as the inability to isolate/transect the cystic duct. After propensity matching, we investigated surgical indications, perioperative outcomes, and the necessity for secondary ERCP, percutaneous drainage, and completion cholecystectomy.Results
65 (0.39%) patients underwent subtotal cholecystectomy; 54 (83.1%) began laparoscopically, of which 30 (55.6%) required conversion to laparotomy. Subtotal cholecystectomy, performed more frequently for acute cholecystitis (70.8% vs 34.6%), was associated with extended hospitalizations (4 d vs 2 d) and frequent surgical site infections (20% vs 4.6%). 25 (38.5%) subtotal cholecystectomy patients required ≥1 secondary intervention, and compared to standard cholecystectomy, underwent higher rates postoperative ERCP (30.8% vs 5.4%), percutaneous drainage (9.2% vs 1.5%), and completion cholecystectomy (6.2% vs 0%) [all P < 0.05].Discussion
Subtotal cholecystectomy fails to control the cystic duct, resulting in significant morbidity. Most do not require completion cholecystectomy; however, patients demand close observation and, frequently, secondary interventions. 相似文献18.
Aitua Salami Nkosi H. Alvarez Amit R.T. Joshi 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(11):1008-1015
Background
Previous studies have described pessimistic attitudes of physicians toward recommending surgery for early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, the impact of geographic region on recommendation patterns of surgical treatment for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer is unknown.Methods
The SEER registry was used to identify patients with early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma (AJCC I-II) [2004–2013]. The exposure of interest was geographic region of diagnosis: Midwest, West, Southeast or Northeast. The endpoints of interest were recommendation of no surgery, and overall survival.Results
A total of 24,408 patients were identified [Midwest – 10.6%, West – 50.1%, Southeast – 21.7% and Northeast – 17.6%]. Overall, 38% of patients had a recommendation of no surgery by their provider. On univariate analysis, the likelihood of having a recommendation of no surgery was lowest in the NE [OR: Northeast (0.8), West (1.6), Southeast (1.3), and Midwest (Ref); p < 0.05 for all]. This association persisted following risk adjustment. Geographic region was an independent predictor of mortality, irrespective of resection status.Conclusion
Significant disparities in surgical treatment recommendation patterns and survival for early-stage pancreatic cancer exist based on geographic location. Improved adherence to guideline-driven treatment recommendations, standardization of care processes, and regionalization may help stem the existing variability in care and outcomes. 相似文献19.
Anastasia Plotkin Eugene P. Ceppa Ben L. Zarzaur Elizabeth M. Kilbane Taylor S. Riall Henry A. Pitt 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(3):279-285
Background
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MISDP) has been shown to be safe relative to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). However, MISDP has been slow to adopt for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study sought to compare outcomes following MISDP vs. ODP for PDAC.Methods
Data were prospectively collected from 2011 to 2014 for DP by the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients without PDAC on surgical pathology were excluded. Impact of minimally invasive approach on morbidity and mortality was analyzed using two-way statistical analyses.Results
Of 6198 patients undergoing DP, 501 (7.5%) had a pathologic diagnosis of PDAC. MISDP was undertaken in 166 (33.1%) patients, ODP was performed in 335 (66.9%). MISDP and ODP were not different in preoperative comorbidities or pathologic stage. Overall morbidity (MISDP 31%, ODP 42%; p = 0.024), transfusion (MISDP 6%, ODP 23%; p = 0.0001), pneumonia (MISDP 1%, ODP 7%; p = 0.004), surgical site infections (MISDP 8%, OPD 17%; p = 0.013), sepsis (MISDP 2%, ODP 8%; p = 0.007), and length of stay (MISDP 5.0 days, ODP 7.0 days; p = 0.009) were lower in the MIS group. Mortality (MISDP 0%, ODP 1%; p = 0.307), pancreatic fistula (MISDP 12%, ODP 19%; p = 0.073), and delayed gastric emptying (MISDP 3%, ODP 7%; p = 0.140) were similar.Conclusions
This analysis of a large multi-institution North American experience of DP for treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma suggests that short-term postoperative outcomes are improved with MISDP. 相似文献20.
Stefano Andrianello Giovanni Marchegiani Giuseppe Malleo Tommaso Pollini Deborah Bonamini Roberto Salvia Claudio Bassi Luca Landoni 《HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association》2017,19(3):264-269