Objective and non‐invasive evaluation of photorejuvenation effect with intense pulsed light treatment in Asian skin

Background Intense pulsed light (IPL) has been widely used for photorejuvenation. Although previous literature has shown clinical effectiveness of IPL treatments on cutaneous photoaging, the associated changes in the biophysical properties of the skin following IPL treatments have not been fully elucidated. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in skin biophysical properties in patients with photoaging after IPL treatments, using non‐invasive, objective skin measuring devices. Patients and methods A total of 26 Korean women with facial dyschromias underwent three sessions of IPL treatment at 4‐week intervals. Outcome assessments included standardized photography, global evaluation by blinded investigators, patients’ self‐assessment and objective measurements of colour (Mexameter MX18, Chromatometer), elasticity (Cutometer), roughness (Visiometer), sebum (Sebumeter) and skin hydration (Corneometer). Results Intense pulsed light treatments produced a 15% decrease in the size of representative pigmented lesions (P < 0.05). Patients’ self‐assessment revealed that 84% and 58% of subjects considered their pigmented lesions and wrinkles were improved respectively. Objective colorimetric measurement demonstrated significant improvements following IPL treatments that were most remarkable after one session of IPL. Moreover, skin elasticity showed significant improvements at the end of the study. Skin wrinkles as measured using Visiometer showed a mild improvement without statistical significance. Sebum secretion and water content of skin remained unchanged. Conclusions Intense pulsed light provided significant improvement in the appearance of facial pigmented lesions in Korean patients. These effects appeared to be more remarkable in improving pigmentation, skin tone and elasticity.     

Intense pulsed light source for the treatment of dye laser resistant port‐wine stains

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of an intense pulsed light (IPL) irradiator system for the treatment of port‐wine stains (PWS) resistant to multiple pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen PWS patients, who were previously found to be resistant to multiple PDL treatments, were treated four times with a second generation IPL system. The clinical efficacy was evaluated on close‐up photographs 2 months after the last treatment.

RESULTS: Patients with dye laser resistant PWS could be divided into two groups: responders to IPL treatments (46.7%) and non‐responders (53.3%). All responders obtained more than 50% reduction, and 85.7% of the responders obtained between 75% and 100% reduction of their lesions. The group of non‐responders was defined as patients who obtained less than 25% clearance.

CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of a group of PWS patients, who did not respond to previous PDL treatments, obtained good or excellent clinical effect after four treatments with the IPL system. All PWS, except those located in the V₂ area of the face, responded to the treatments. The IPL treatment modality was found to be safe and efficient for the treatment of PWS, except for those located in the V₂ area.     

Comparison of pulsed dye laser versus combined pulsed dye laser and Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris

Background: Both pulsed dye laser and combined 585/1064-nm (sequential dual-wavelength PDL and Nd:YAG) laser improves inflammatory skin disorders including acne vulgaris. Objective: To compare the efficacy of 585-nm pulsed dye laser versus sequential dual-wavelength PDL and Nd:YAG in treatment of acne vulgaris. Patients and method: Thirty patients with acne vulgaris were treated by PDL alone on half of the face while contra lateral half was treated by combined 585/1064 nm laser. Results: The study showed that inflammatory acne lesions count was significantly reduced by 82.5% (p 0.0001) on PDL sides and by 83.5% (p 0.00001) on combined 585/1064-nm side after 8 weeks, while reduction of non-inflammatory acne lesions was observed at 8 weeks by 58.4% and 71.5% respectively. However, difference between the two modalities was not statistically significant. Conclusion: PDL and combined PDL/Nd:YAG laser treatment were found to be an effective, safe and well-tolerated treatment option for inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne vulgaris.     

Prospective,open‐label,rater‐blinded and self‐controlled pilot study of the treatment of proliferating superficial infantile hemangiomas with 0.5% topical timolol cream versus 595‐nm pulsed dye laser

Topical timolol and 595‐nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) are both widely used in the treatment of superficial infantile hemangiomas (IH). However, to date, there is no reliable study comparing the therapeutic outcomes between the two treatment options. We designed the present study to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of timolol cream and PDL in the treatment of superficial proliferating IH. Twenty‐one patients with superficial IH were included in the study. Each lesion was divided into two regions; one part was treated with 0.5% topical timolol cream four times daily, and the other part was treated monthly with PDL. Both treatments were continued for 2–6 months. Five independent and blinded assessors were asked to judge the results in both the topical timolol‐treated and PDL‐treated parts by comparing photographs taken before and after treatment. Both treatments resulted in significant clinical improvements after 3.39 sessions in the 2‐month follow up. The average visual evaluation showed that PDL had significantly better results than topical timolol (6.55 ± 2.26 to 4.98 ± 2.92, P < 0.01). No patients experienced permanent side‐effects during the treatment. Our short‐term study revealed that PDL had better results compared with topical timolol cream application in the treatment of superficial proliferating IH. Further studies with longer follow‐up time and larger sample size are required to validate our findings.     

Evidence-based review of lasers, light sources and photodynamic therapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris

Background There is a considerable need for effective and safe treatment for acne vulgaris. Objective In a systematic review with an evidence‐based approach to assess the effects of optical treatments for acne vulgaris. Methods Original publications of controlled clinical trials were identified through searches in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Results A total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 3 controlled trials (CT) were identified, involving a total of 587 patients. Interventions included photodynamic therapy (PDT; 5 RCTs), infrared lasers (4 RCTs), broad‐spectrum light sources (3 RCTs, 1 CT), pulsed dye lasers (PDL; 2 RCTs, 1 CT), intense pulsed light (IPL; 1 RCTs, 2 CTs), and potassium titanyl phosphate laser (1 RCT). The randomization method was mentioned in 6 of 16 RCTs, and one trial described adequate allocation concealment. Most trials were intraindividual trials (12 of 19), which applied blinded response evaluations (12 of 19) and assessed a short‐term efficacy up to 12 weeks after treatment (17 of 19). Based on the present best available evidence, we conclude that optical treatments possess the potential to improve inflammatory acne on a short‐term basis with the most consistent outcomes for PDT [up to 68% improvement, aminolevulinic acid (ALA), methyl‐aminolevulinic acid (MAL) and red light]. IPL‐assisted PDT seems to be superior to IPL alone. Only two trials compare optical vs. conventional treatments, and further studies are needed. Side‐effects from optical treatments included pain, erythema, oedema, crusting, hyperpigmentation, pustular eruptions and were more intense for treatments combined with ALA or MAL. Conclusion Evidence from controlled clinical trials indicates a short‐term efficacy from optical treatments for acne vulgaris with the most consistent outcomes for PDT. We recommend that patients are preoperatively informed of the existing evidence, which indicates that optical treatments today are not included among first line treatments.     

Significant reduction of inflammation and sebaceous glands size in acne vulgaris lesions after intense pulsed light treatment

Intense pulsed light (IPL) has been used for years in treatment of acne vulgaris. However, quantitative evaluation of histopathological changes after its use as a sole therapy was poorly investigated. Accordingly, this study aims to objectively evaluate inflammatory infiltrate and sebaceous glands in acne vulgaris after IPL. Twenty‐four patients of acne were treated with six IPL sessions. Clinical evaluation was done at 2 weeks after last session by counting acne lesions. Patient satisfaction using Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) was recorded at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months after IPL. Using histopathological and computerized morphometric analysis, quantitative evaluation of inflammatory infiltrate and measurement of surface area of sebaceous glands were performed for skin biopsies at baseline and 2 weeks after last session. After IPL, there was significant reduction of all acne lesions especially inflammatory variety with significant decrease of CADI score at 2 weeks and 3 months after IPL (p < .05). Microscopically, there was significant decrease in density of inflammatory infiltrate and surface area of sebaceous glands (p < .05). So, IPL is fairly effective therapy in acne vulgaris especially inflammatory variety. The results suggest that IPL could improve acne lesions through targeting both inflammation and sebaceous glands.     

Photodynamic therapy for acne vulgaris: a randomized, controlled, split-face clinical trial of topical aminolevulinic acid and pulsed dye laser therapy

Background  There remains the need for more effective therapeutic options to treat acne vulgaris. Interest in light-based acne treatments has increased, but few randomized, controlled clinical trials assessing the value of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for acne have been reported.
Aims  We sought to examine the efficacy of PDT using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and pulsed dye laser therapy in the treatment of acne.
Patients/methods  We conducted a randomized, controlled, split-face, single-blind clinical trial of 44 patients with facial acne. Patients were randomized to receive three pulsed dye laser treatments to one side of the face after a 60–90 min ALA application time, while the contralateral side remained untreated and served as a control. Serial blinded lesion counts and global acne severity ratings were performed.
Results  Global acne severity ratings improved bilaterally with the improvement noted to be statistically significantly greater in treated skin than in untreated skin. Erythematous macules (remnants of previously active inflammatory lesions) decreased in number in treated skin when compared with control skin and there was a transient but significant decrease in inflammatory papules in treated skin when compared with untreated skin. There were no other statistically significant differences between treated and untreated sides of the face in terms of counts of any subtype of acne lesion. Thirty percent of patients were deemed responders to this treatment with respect to improvement in their inflammatory lesion counts, while only 7% of patients responded in terms of noninflammatory lesion counts.
Conclusions  PDT with the treatment regimen employed here may be beneficial for a subgroup of patients with inflammatory acne.     

Intense pulsed light in the treatment of non‐aesthetic facial and neck vascular lesions: report of 85 cases

Background Intense pulsed light (IPL) treatment is one of the most effective procedures for patients with non‐aesthetic vascular lesions in addition to signs of skin photoageing, and it has been reported as very successful in the treatment of telangiectasias, spider nevi, erythrosis, and above all, rosacea and poikiloderma. Its use is based on the principle of selective photothermolysis, which exploits the haemoglobin absorption peak among its range of wavelengths. Objective The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in treating non‐aesthetic vascular skin lesions, especially with regard to poikiloderma of Civatte and rosacea. Methods A total of eighty‐five patients, 64 women and 21 men, with 63 non‐aesthetic vascular lesions (28 Poikiloderma of Civatte and 35 rosacea), 22 pigmented lesions (UV‐related hyperpigmentation of solar lentigo‐type) and four precancerous lesions (actinic keratosis, AKs), were treated repeatedly with IPL for 2 years. The patients received a mean of five treatments (range 4–6) at 3‐weekly intervals. They were evaluated via clinical observations and professional photographs were taken before each treatment and after 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. The outcome of the IPL treatments was evaluated by four independent dermatologists, who were not informed about the study protocol, and who assessed the performance of IPL by dividing the results into four categories: no results, slight improvement, moderate improvement and marked improvement. Results All the patients showed improvements in their overall lesions: 72 lesions (80.9%) achieved a marked improvement, 14 lesions (15.7%) achieved a moderate improvement and three lesions (3.4%) achieved a slight improvement. The results of the 63 non‐aesthetic vascular lesions in Rosacea and Poikiloderma of Civatte were: 51 with a marked improvement, 10 with moderate improvement, whereas only two lesions achieved a slight improvement. The improvement of all four actinic keratoses was marked whereas the 22 pigmented lesions obtained a marked improvement in 17 cases, a moderate improvement in four cases and a slight improvement in one case. No undesirable effects were observed. Conclusions Our study confirms how by minimizing side‐effects, time and costs, IPL can be effective and safe for the treatment of non‐aesthetic facial and neck vascular lesions.     

Combination of intense pulsed light and fractional CO2 laser treatments for patients with acne with inflammatory and scarring lesions

Background. Various laser and light sources are been used increasingly in cosmetic dermatology. Aim. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination intense pulsed light (IPL) and fractional CO₂ laser in treating patients with acne with both inflammatory and scarring lesions. Methods. In total, 37 Chinese patients with acne with facial inflammatory and scar lesions were treated. Successive sessions of 4–6 IPL treatments followed by 2 sessions of fractional CO₂ laser treatments were applied. Effectiveness was determined by the dermatologist’s evaluation, patient self‐assessment, and devices that measure skin colour, sebum secretion and skin hydration. Results. IPL treatments significantly reduced the inflammatory lesion score and the atrophic scar score compared with baseline. Subsequent fractional CO₂ laser treatments further decreased the atrophic scar score. Both scores remained low when patients were followed up at 6 months. Around 90% of the patients experienced significant or moderate overall improvement, and almost 80% patients rated their results as ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. The melanin index (MI), erythema index (EI) and skin sebum level all significantly decreased after IPL treatments, and the EI and sebum level were still low when assessed at the 3‐month follow‐up, although the MI had increased again. The adverse effects (AEs) of both treatments were transient and bearable. Conclusions.  IPL in combination with fractional CO₂ laser was effective in treating patients with acne with both inflammatory lesions and atrophic scars, and the AEs were acceptable.     

Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris with a novel filter

Acne vulgaris is one of the most common skin diseases affecting young people. Intense pulsed light (IPL) has become a well-recognized method in the treatment of acne vulgaris. We aim evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel IPL filter at wavelength of 400–600 nm and 800–1,200 nm in the treatment of inflammatory acne lesions. Twenty-one patients with Pillsbury I–III facial acne vulgaris between July 2017 and January 2018 were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. Five sessions of IPL treatment were administered to the subjects at 4-week interval. Final assessment was performed 1 month after the final treatment. One month posttreatment, over 75% subjects exhibited excellent or good response. Of the Pillsbury I–II patients, the effective rate reached 88.24%. The inflammatory lesions were dramatically decreased (25.23 ± 2.76 versus 14.01 ± 1.98) and statistically evident (P = .031). According to Hayashi assessment of acne severity, there was a significant improvement at follow-up visit (P = .022). Moreover, patients reported significant improvements in self-evaluation. The novel IPL filter at wavelength of 400–600 nm and 800–1,200 nm provides an effective option to treatment of inflammatory acne lesions, especially for Pillsbury I–II acne patients, with minimal reversible side effects, such as transient post-inflammatory pigmentation.     

Randomized,controlled trial split‐faced study of 595‐nm pulsed dye laser in the treatment of acne vulgaris and acne erythema in adolescents and early adulthood

The high prevalence of acne vulgaris in teenagers has increased comorbidities. Lasers offer alternative options for acne treatment because they have rapid action, low systemic adverse effects, and do not require everyday treatment. To study the efficacy and patients’ satisfaction of 595‐nm pulse dye laser (PDL) treatment of acne vulgaris and acne erythema in adolescents and early adulthood, we designed a blocked‐randomized, split‐faced 595‐nm PDL (fluence 8 J/cm³ pulse duration 10 ms, spot size 7 mm, 2 session every 2 weeks) study in patients with mild to moderate acne by comparing the laser‐treated and non‐treated side. The acne lesion counts, acne erythema grading, and acne severity grading were evaluated at baseline and 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Thirty patients were recruited. The results showed no statistically significant difference except the papule count at week 4 which was ?1.828 on the treated side and 0.103 on the non‐treated side of the face, P‐value 0.0018. There was no statistically significant difference of acne severity grading and acne erythema grading between both sides of the face. The mean scores of patients’ satisfaction on the laser‐treated side were 75, 81, and 81%, respectively. The PDL treatment in this study reveals no significant improvement in acne therapy; however, the patients were satisfied with this laser treatment.     

强脉冲光及595nm染料激光治疗面部痤疮后红斑自身对比研究

目的 评价及对比强脉冲光和595 nm染料激光治疗痤疮后红斑的临床疗效及安全性.方法 采用随机自身左右面部对照临床试验研究方法,选取20例患有痤疮后红斑的患者,每例患者的两侧面颊随机分配接受强脉冲光或595 nm染料激光治疗3次,每次间隔4周.分别在每次治疗前以及最后1次治疗1个月后使用VISIA拍照,测量红斑值;通过四分红斑严重程度表评价治疗前后双侧面部红斑严重程度.每次治疗后均填写疼痛评分表、不良反应记录表,最后1次随访通过问卷形式对患者进行满意度调查.结果 强脉冲光侧平均红斑值治疗前472.25±86.02,治疗后357.15±82.71;595 nm染料激光侧治疗前476.40±74.25,治疗后360.05±64.83,经重复测量资料方差分析,可以认为随治疗时间延长,患者红斑值有所降低(F=197.666,P＜0.001);强脉冲光侧治疗效果优于595 nm染料激光侧(F=1 173.909,P＜0.001).强脉冲光侧治疗前后四分红斑值差异有统计学意义(Z=28.735,P＜ 0.001),595 nm染料激光侧差异亦有统计学意义(Z=31.450,P＜0.001).激光术后VAS视觉评分发现,595 nm染料激光治疗侧疼痛度低于强脉冲光,两者差异有统计学意义(t=2.468,P＜0.05).评价满意和非常满意的患者595 nm染料激光17例,强脉冲光15例,两组差异无统计学意义(Z=2.696,P＞0.05).强脉冲光不良反应包括红斑、灼烧感、紧绷感、水疱、色素沉着,595 nm染料激光不良反应包括红斑、紫癜反应,均在数小时至数天消失.结论 应用强脉冲光及595 nm染料激光治疗痤疮后红斑均安全有效,适合临床推广应用,强脉冲光相较于595 nm染料激光疗效更优,但疼痛度更高.     

The pulsed‐dye laser as an adjuvant treatment modality in acne vulgaris: a randomized controlled single‐blinded trial

Background Acne vulgaris is the most common skin disease and can pose a substantial therapeutic challenge. Recently, several phototherapeutic modalities, most notably pulsed‐dye laser (PDL) treatment, have been introduced, but the published results – albeit promising – are controversial. Objectives To assess the efficacy of an adjuvant PDL treatment when combined with a proven topical treatment [fixed‐combination clindamycin 1%–benzoyl peroxide 5% hydrating gel (C/BPO)]. Methods Eighty patients (38 males and 42 females, mean ± SD age 19·7 ± 5·9 years) were randomized in a 1 : 2 ratio to receive C/BPO alone or in combination with PDL treatment (wavelength 585 nm, energy fluence 3 J cm⁻², pulse duration 0·35 ms, spot size 7 mm). Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 2 and 4 weeks after initial treatment. The primary end points were the Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA) score and lesion count; the secondary end point was the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results Both groups showed a significant improvement during observation [ISGA 27·1% (C/BPO) and 24·6% (C/BPO + laser), total lesion count 9·2% and 9·0%, inflammatory lesion count 36·3% and 36·9%, DLQI 54·5% and 42·5%], but there was no significant or otherwise appreciable difference between treatment modalities as far as the extent of improvement was concerned. Patients with more severe findings at baseline had a greater benefit from either therapy regimen. Conclusions Our findings do not support the concept of a substantial benefit of PDL treatment in acne vulgaris.     

Treatment of injection‐induced ecchymoses with light/laser‐assisted technology

An increasing number of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures, such as filler or botulinum toxin injections, are performed annually. These procedures are associated with a high risk of post‐procedure bruising or ecchymosis. Ecchymoses arise following hemorrhage and extravasation of red blood cells into the subcutaneous tissue, leading to local skin discoloration. Although ecchymoses generally resolve within 14 days, their appearance is cosmetically bothersome, and they may be painful and cause major distress to patients. Recent clinical evidence suggests that light/laser technology with pulsed dye laser (PDL) or intense pulsed light (IPL) can dramatically alleviate and minimize bruising when delivered within 24–72 hr of the injection. This article, will review reports of treatment of ecchymosis by lasers and IPL.     

Effects of 420‐nm intense pulsed light in an acne animal model

Background Blue light in the 400–420 nm range has been shown to reduce the levels of Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) in the skin. P. acnes has been postulated to be a critical trigger for inflammatory acne. Thus, treatment with 420 nm‐intense pulsed light should reduce inflammatory activity in acne. Aim To evaluate the clinical and histological effects of 420 nm‐intense pulsed light treatment on acne in animal model. Method Inflammation acne animal model was constructed by intradermal injection of P. acnes of rat auricular. Levels of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP‐2), markers of inflammation implicated in acne, were assessed in treated and untreated animals by immunohistochemistry and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Result Treatment with 420 nm intense pulsed light led to marked improvement after 6 biweekly treatments. Immunohistochemistry and PCR showed that TNF‐α and MMP‐2 levels correlated with the extent of acneiform activity and were reduced by treatment with 420 nm light. Conclusion A 420‐nm intense pulsed light may exert its beneficial effects on inflammatory acne by reducing the levels of P. acnes and secondarily reducing inflammation induced by the bacteria.     

Photodynamic therapy of acne vulgaris using 5‐aminolevulinic acid 0.5% liposomal spray and intense pulsed light in combination with topical keratolytic agents

Background Increasing antibiotic resistance of Propionibacterium acnes and growing awareness on the side effects of topical and systemic drugs in the treatment of acne vulgaris by physicians and patients have paved the way for a search into new efficacious and safe treatment modalities such as photodynamic therapy (PDT). Although the efficacy of PDT using 20% 5‐aminolevulinic acid (ALA) cream has been established, phototoxic side effects limit its use. The 5‐ALA concentration can be lowered by a factor of 40 by changing the vehicle of 5‐ALA from a moisturizing cream to liposome encapsulation. Objectives Assessment of the efficacy and the safety of PDT using 5‐ALA 0.5% in liposomal spray and intense pulsed light (IPL) in combination with topical peeling agents (Li‐PDT‐PC) in acne vulgaris. Materials and Methods 32 patients suffering from acne participated in this randomized, prospective, single blind study. All patients were treated with Li‐PDT‐PC. During the study nine patients were additionally treated with topical or systemic antibiotics (Li‐PDT‐PC‐AT). These patients were removed from the study although their results were recorded. Results After a mean period of 7.8 months and a mean number of 5.7 treatments the mean total number of lesions dropped from 34.6 lesions to 11.0 lesions, resulting in a mean improvement of 68.2%. Side effects were minimal. Additionally, an intention to treat analysis was conducted. Conclusion Photodynamic therapy of acne vulgaris using 5‐ALA 0.5% liposomal spray and IPL in combination with topical peeling agents is safe and efficacious, even in patients with acne recalcitrant to standard therapy.     

Combined pulsed dye laser and Q‐switched Nd:YAG laser intraumatic facial tattoo removal: A case series

Traumatic tattoos can be treated with several methods, including mechanical and chemical devices. However, they are rarely used due to the high risk of permanent side effects such as scarring and depigmentation. Recently, laser devices, especially the Q‐switched (QS) laser and the pulsed dye laser (PDL), applied in combination, have achieved complete clearance of the lesions without any risk of side effects. Herein, we reported three cases of traumatic facial tattoos successfully treated with combined PDL and QS Nd:YAG laser.     

Clinical and histological evaluation of 1% nadifloxacin cream in the treatment of acne vulgaris in Korean patients

Objectives Nadifloxacin is a fluoroquinolone with broad‐spectrum antibacterial activity. Although it is used as an acne treatment in some European countries, it has not been used to treat Korean acne patients. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 1% nadifloxacin cream and the histological changes it incurs when used to treat mild to moderate facial acne in Korean patients. Methods An eight‐week, randomized, prospective, split‐face, double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled trial was performed. All participants were treated with 1% nadifloxacin cream on one‐half of the face and vehicle cream on the other, twice per day for eight weeks. Results At final visits, inflammatory acne lesions were reduced by 70% on nadifloxacin‐treated skin and increased by 13.5% on vehicle‐treated skin; non‐inflammatory acne lesions showed reductions of 48.1 and 10.1%, respectively. A significant difference was observed between the two treatments at four weeks. Histopathological examinations of the acne lesions showed decreased inflammation and interleukin‐8 expression but no change in transforming growth factor‐β expression in nadifloxacin‐treated skin compared with vehicle‐treated skin after eight weeks of treatment. Conclusions Nadifloxacin 1% cream is an effective, safe, and well‐tolerated topical treatment for Korean patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Histopathological changes after nadifloxacin treatment were well correlated with clinical outcomes. Therefore, nadifloxacin can be used as an effective and safe treatment option in the management of mild to moderate acne in Asian subjects.     

Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port-wine stains: a randomized side-by-side trial with blinded response evaluation

Background  Pulsed dye lasers (PDLs) are considered the treatment of choice for port-wine stains (PWS). Studies have suggested broadband intense pulsed light (IPL) to be efficient as well. So far, no studies have directly compared the PDL with IPL in a randomized clinical trial.
Objectives  To compare efficacy and adverse events of PDL and IPL in an intraindividual randomized clinical trial.
Methods  Twenty patients with PWS (face, trunk, extremities; pink, red and purple colours; skin types I–III) received one side-by-side treatment with PDL (V-beam Perfecta, 595 nm, 0·45–1·5 ms; Candela Laser Corporation, Wayland, MA, U.S.A.) and IPL (StarLux, Lux G prototype handpiece, 500–670 and 870–1400 nm, 5–10 ms; Palomar Medical Technologies, Burlington, MA, U.S.A.). Settings depended on the preoperative lesional colour. Treatment outcome was evaluated by blinded, clinical evaluations and by skin reflectance measurements.
Results  Both PDL and IPL lightened PWS. Median clinical improvements were significantly better for PDL (65%) than IPL (30%) ( P  = 0·0004). A higher proportion of patients obtained good or excellent clearance rates with the PDL (75%) compared with IPL (30%) ( P  = 0·0104). Skin reflectance also documented better results after PDL (33% lightening) than IPL (12% lightening) ( P  = 0·002). Eighteen of 20 patients preferred to receive continued treatments with PDL ( P  = 0·0004). No adverse events were observed with PDL or IPL.
Conclusions  Both the specific PDL and IPL types of equipment used in this study lightened PWS and both were safe with no adverse events. However, the PDL conveyed the advantages of better efficacy and higher patient preference.     

Multiple sequential light and laser sources to activate aminolevulinic acid in the treatment of photodamage: A retrospective study

Introduction: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate photodynamic therapy (PDT) with aminolevulinic acid (ALA) for cutaneous photorejuvenation using blue light sequentially with red light, pulsed-dye laser (PDL), and/or intense pulsed light (IPL). Materials and Methods: Ninety-six patients (121 treatments) had photodamage treated with field-directed ALA-PDT from 2001 to 2010 in this single-center study. Treatments were performed with blue light + PDL, blue light + IPL, blue light + PDL + IPL, or blue light + red light + PDL + IPL. Outcome measures were obtained via telephone questionnaire and graded on a four-point scale. Results: There were no significant differences in patient-reported improvement in photodamage, overall skin quality, and postprocedure adverse events between treatment arms. However, number of patients in the blue light + red light + PDL + IPL group was markedly smaller (n = 2) than that in the other groups (n = 14–46). Discussion: Although results showed a trend toward greater efficacy with similar tolerability using multiple, sequential light and laser sources with ALA-PDT for photorejuvenation, the potential for recall bias and widely disparate number of patients between treatment groups and follow-up times between patients severely limit this retrospective study. Nevertheless, despite these major statistical flaws, the results may provide valuable information regarding the safety of multiple modalities with PDT of photodamage in a single session.