Levobupivacaine–tramadol combination for caudal block in children: a randomized,double‐blinded,prospective study1

Background: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and duration of analgesia after caudal levobupivacaine 0.125% or caudal tramadol 1.5 mg·kg⁻¹ and mixture of both in children undergoing day‐case surgery. Methods: Sixty‐three American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II children between 1 and 7 years old scheduled for inguinal hernia repair under sevoflurane anesthesia were randomized to receive caudal levobupivacaine 0.125% (group L), caudal tramadol 1.5 mg·kg⁻¹ (group T) or mixture of both (group LT) (total volume of caudal solution was 1 ml·kg⁻¹). Duration of analgesia and requirement for additional analgesics were noted. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the Children’s and Infants’ Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) every 15 min for the first hour, and after 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h. Analgesia was supplemented whenever pain score was ≥4. Results: No patient experienced significant intraoperative hemodynamic response to surgical incision. Duration of analgesia was significantly longer in group LT than in group L and group T (545 ± 160 min vs 322 ± 183 min and 248 ± 188 min, respectively) (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the group L and group T for duration of analgesia (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences among the groups in the number of patients requiring analgesia after operation (P = 0.7). No signs of motor block were observed after the first postoperative hour in any of the patients. Conclusion: Addition of tramadol increased the duration of analgesia produced by caudal levobupivacaine in children.     

Dose-response study of intrathecal fentanyl added to bupivacaine in infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic surgery

Background: Intrathecal (IT) adjuncts often are used to enhance the duration of spinal bupivacaine. Fentanyl is a spinal analgesic that could be a useful adjunct, and enhances the duration and quality of sensory block in adult surgical and obstetric population. However, no data exist to assess the dose–response characteristics of IT fentanyl when added to bupivacaine in infants. Methods: Fifty‐eight infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic procedures were randomized into four groups to receive plain 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine F0 (<5 kg = 0.5 mg·kg^?1; 5–10 kg = 0.4 mg·kg^?1). Groups F0.25, F0.5, and F1 groups received bupivacaine added with 0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg·kg^?1 of fentanyl, respectively. Duration of spinal anesthesia (SA) as assessed by the recovery of hip flexion in the postoperative period was the primary variable analyzed. In addition, the duration of analgesia in the postoperative period, rescue postoperative analgesic requirements and hemodynamic changes were recorded. Results: Fifty‐six infants were studied. The four groups were similar for age, weight, duration of surgery, onset of sensory, motor block, and the highest level of analgesia attained. The addition of 1 μg·kg^?1 fentanyl (F1) significantly increased the duration of SA (74.27 ± 6.1 min) compared to the control group (51.21 ± 5.2 min) (P = 0.001). Postoperative pain‐free interval was prolonged (P = 0.004) and significantly less rescue analgesics were required after 1 μg·kg^?1 IT fentanyl (P = 0.032). These parameters did not show any significant difference among groups F0, F0.25, and F0.5. Conclusions: The addition of 1 μg·kg^?1 IT fentanyl to spinal bupivacaine prolonged the duration of spinal block in infants undergoing lower abdominal and urologic procedures.     

Midazolam for caudal analgesia in children: comparison with caudal bupivacaine

In a randomized, double-blind study we have examined the analgesic efficacy of caudal administration of midazolam, bupivacaine, or a mixture of both drugs in 45 children, undergoing inguinal herniotomy. They were allocated randomly into three groups (n = 15 in each) to receive a caudal injection of either 0.25% bupivacaine 1 ml · kg^?1 with or without midazolam 50 μg · kg^?1 or midazolam 50 μg · kg^?1 with normal saline 1 ml · kg^?1. There were no differences in quality of pain relief, postoperative behaviour or analgesic requirements between the midazolam group and the other two groups. Times to first analgesic administration (paracetamol suppositories) were longer (P < 0.001) in the bupivacaine-midazolam group than in the other two groups. Further, the bupivacaine-midazolam group received fewer (P < 0.05) doses of paracetamol than the bupivacaine group. Side effects such as motor weakness, respiratory depression or prolonged sedation were not observed in patients who received caudal epidural midazolam only. We conclude that caudal midazolam in a dose of 50 μg · kg^?1 provides equivalent analgesia to bupivacaine 0.25%, when administered postoperatively in a volume of 1 ml · kg^?1 for children following unilateral inguinal hemiotomy.

     

Adequacy of caudal analgesia in children after penoscrotal and inguinal surgery using 0.5 or 1.0 ml·kg−1 bupivacaine 0.125%

To determine the optimal volume of bupivacaine 0.125% for postoperative caudal analgesia, we compared the effectiveness of 0.5 ml·kg^?1 and 1 ml·kg^?1 of bupivacaine 0.125% with 1:200,000 epinephrine in 80 children undergoing penoscrotal and inguinal surgery. The adequacy of caudal analgesia and supplemental analgesic requirements did not differ between the two groups at any time during the first 12 hr after surgery. We conclude that 0.5 ml·kg^?1 of bupivacaine 0.125% with 1:200,000 epinephrine is as effective as 1 ml·kg^?1 of the same solution and recommend its use for penoscrotal surgery. The evidence for ss of 0.5 ml·kg^?1 of bupivacaine 0.125% for inguinal owever, is inconclusive because of an insufficient patients studied.     

The effect of caudal vs intravenous morphine on early extubation and postoperative analgesic requirements for stage 2 and 3 single-ventricle palliation: a double blind randomized trial

Background: High‐dose single‐shot caudal morphine has been postulated to facilitate early extubation and to lower initial analgesic requirements after staged single‐ventricle (SV) palliation. Methods: With Institutional Review Board approval and written informed parental consent, 64 SV children aged 75–1667 days were randomized to pre‐incisional caudal morphine–bupivacaine (100 μg·kg^?1 morphine (concentration 0.1%), mixed with 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 : 200 000 epinephrine, total 1 ml·kg^?1) and postcardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) intravenous (IV) droperidol (75 μg·kg^?1) (‘active caudal group’) or pre‐incisional caudal saline (1 ml·kg^?1) and post‐CPB IV morphine (150 μg·kg^?1) with droperidol (75 μg·kg^?1) (‘active IV group’). Assignment remained concealed from families and the care teams throughout the trial. Early extubation failure rates (primary or reintubation within 24 h), time to first postoperative rescue morphine analgesia, and 12‐h postoperative morphine requirements were assessed for extubated patients. Results: Thirty‐one (12 stage 2) SV patients received caudal morphine and 32 (15 stage 2) received IV morphine. Extubation failure rates were 6/31 (19%) for caudal and 5/32 (16%) for IV morphine. For successfully extubated patients (n = 54), active caudal treatment significantly delayed the need for postoperative rescue morphine in stage 3 patients (P = 0.02) but not in stage 2 patients (P = 0.189) (Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with LogRank test). The reduction in 12‐h postoperative morphine requirements with active caudal treatment did not reach significance (P = 0.085) but morphine requirements were significantly higher for stage 2 compared with stage 3 patients (P < 0.001) (two‐way anova in n = 50 extubated patients). Conclusions: High‐dose caudal morphine with bupivacaine delayed the need for rescue morphine analgesia in stage 3 patients. All stage 2 patients required early rescue morphine and had significantly higher postoperative 12‐h morphine requirements than stage 3 patients. Early extubation is feasible for the majority of stage 2 and 3 SV patients regardless of analgesic regimen. The study was underpowered to assess differences in extubation failure rates.     

Effects of intrathecal fentanyl on quality of spinal anesthesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair

Background: The effect of intrathecal fentanyl on the characteristics of spinal anesthesia has not been investigated in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the incidence and severity of pain during peritoneal sac traction is decreased by addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia. Methods: Children (6–14 years) were randomized into two groups. Group F (n = 25): hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.2 μg·kg⁻¹ of fentanyl. Group P (n = 25): hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.9% NaCl (placebo). The dose of bupivacaine was 0.4 mg·kg⁻¹. The primary variable was the incidence and severity of pain during peritoneal sac traction. Spinal block characteristics, duration of spinal anesthesia assessed by recovery of hip flexion and duration of analgesia were the secondary variables measured, and the side effects were noted. Results: There were significant differences in incidence of pain and pain scores during sac traction with lower incidence and scores in the fentanyl group (P = 0.009). Two groups were similar regarding the level of sensory block during sac traction and duration of spinal anesthesia. Duration of spinal analgesia was prolonged significantly in the fentanyl group (P = 0.025). Conclusion: Intrathecal fentanyl at a dose of 0.2 μg·kg⁻¹ added to bupivacaine significantly improves the quality of intraoperative analgesia and prolongs postoperative analgesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia.     

Two different doses of caudal neostigmine co-administered with levobupivacaine produces analgesia in children

Background: This study was aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, duration of analgesia, and side effects of two different doses of caudal neostigmine used with levobupivacaine in children. Methods: Sixty boys, between 5 months and 5 years, undergoing genito‐urinary surgery were allocated randomly to one of three groups (n = 20 each). Group I patients received caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine (1 ml·kg^?1) alone. Groups II and III patients received neostigmine (2 and 4 μg·kg^?1 respectively) together with levobupivacaine used in the same dose as Group I. Pain scores were assessed using Children’s and Infant’s Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) at 15th (t₁) min after arrival to postanesthetic care unit, and 1st (t₂), 2nd (t₃), 3rd (t₄), 4th (t₅), 8th (t₆), 16th (t₇), and 24th (t₈) hour postoperatively. Duration of analgesia, amount of additional analgesic (paracetamol), score of motor blockade and complications were recorded for 24 h postoperatively, and compared between groups. Results: CHIPPS scores were higher during t₂, t₃, t₆, t₇ and t₈ periods, duration of analgesia was shorter, and total analgesic consumption was higher in Group I compare to neostigmine groups (P < 0.05). Duration of postoperative analgesia and total analgesic consumption were similar in Groups II and III (P > 0.05). Adverse effects were not different between three groups. Conclusions: Caudal neostigmine in doses of 2 and 4 μg·kg^?1 with levobupivacaine extends the duration of analgesia without increasing the incidence of adverse effects, and 2 μg·kg^?1 seems to be the optimal dose, as higher dose has no further advantages.     

Surgical outcome in children undergoing hypospadias repair under caudal epidural vs penile block

Aim and Objective: To evaluate the effect of penile block vs caudal epidural on the quality of analgesia and surgical outcome following hypospadias repair. Background: Intraoperative penile engorgement because of caudal epidural may result in tension on surgical sutures and alter surgical outcome. Methods: Fifty‐four ASA I and II children were randomly allocated to group P (penile block, 0.25% bupivacaine, 0.5 mg·kg^?1; n = 27) and group C (caudal epidural, 0.25% bupivacaine, 0.5 ml·kg^?1; n = 27), respectively. Quality of analgesia was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) score recorded at 0, 0.5, 3, 6, 12, 24 h, and once a day for the next 4 days. Duration of analgesia was calculated from the institution of block to the first analgesic demand by child or VAS > 5. Total morphine consumption in the first 48 h and oral paracetamol consumption till 5th day were recorded. Children were regularly followed up in their respective outpatient clinic for early or late complications. Results: In group P, lower mean VAS scores were seen from 0.5 h after surgery till day 3 and analgesia lasted for significantly longer duration (82 min) when compared with caudal epidural, P < 0.001. Incidence of urethral fistula formation after primary hypospadias repair was 19.2%, and all had received caudal epidural. An increase of 27% in penile volume from baseline value was observed 10 min after caudal epidural placement, P < 0.05. Conclusion: Penile block provided better analgesia when compared with caudal epidural in children undergoing primary hypospadias repair. Postoperative urethral fistula formation was more likely in children who received caudal epidural.     

An evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine combined with intrathecal or intravenous clonidine in children undergoing orthopedic surgery: a randomized double-blinded study

Background: Propofol is a popular agent for providing intraoperative sedation in pediatric population during lumbar puncture and spinal anesthesia. Adjuvant‐like clonidine is used increasingly in pediatric anesthesia to provide postoperative analgesia with a local anesthetic agent. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of intrathecal and intravenous clonidine on postoperative analgesia/sedation and intraoperative requirements of propofol after intrathecal bupivacaine for orthopedic surgery in children. Methods: Fifty‐nine ASA I and II children aged 6–8 year undergoing orthopedic surgery were randomized to receive intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine 0.2–0.4 mg·kg^?1 and intravenous 2 ml saline (Group B), intrathecal 0.5% bupivacaine 0.2–0.4 mg·kg^?1 plus 1 μg·kg^?1 clonidine and intravenous 2 ml saline (Group BCit), and 0.5% bupivacaine 0.2–0.4 mg·kg^?1 and intravenous 1 μg·kg^?1 clonidine in 2 ml of saline (Group BCiv). Intraoperative sedation was maintained with 20–50 μg·kg^?1·min^?1 of propofol infusion. The requirements of propofol, time to first rescue analgesia, and postoperative pain or sedation scores were assessed. The duration of motor and sensory blocks and perioperative adverse events were determined. Results: Clonidine significantly prolonged the time to first rescue analgesia and reduced the requirements of propofol sedation whether administered intravenously or intrathecally. The mean Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale scores of children were significantly lower in groups BCit and BCiv than in group B. Postoperative sedation scores were higher in groups BCit and BCiv than in group B. Intrathecal clonidine significantly prolonged the time to regression of the sensory block and recovery of motor block. There were no significant differences among the three groups regarding the incidence of perioperative adverse events. Conclusion: Intrathecal or intravenous clonidine similarly provided better postoperative analgesia and sedation and reduced the requirements of propofol. Only intrathecal clonidine prolonged the duration of sensory and motor blocks.     

Ropivacaine in paediatric surgery: preliminary results

In a double blind study 40 patients, aged 1–9 years, undergoing elective minor surgery were examined and randomly divided in two groups (20 children each). After light general anaesthesia Group 1 received caudal injection of bupivacaine 0.25% 2 mg·kg^?1 while Group 2 received 0.2% ropivacaine 2 mg·kg^?1. No differences were observed in demographic data, HR, BP and duration of surgery; the onset time of anaesthesia was 12 min and 9 min in Group 1 and 2 respectively. Ten patients in Group 1 received paracetamol in the first 24 h after surgery while only two children in Group 2 needed analgesic; even the duration of analgesia in the patients requiring paracetamol was superior in group 2 (520 min vs 253 min). No motor block was apparent at awakening in either group and no side effect was noticed. In conclusion ropivacaine seems to be an effective and safe drug in paediatric regional anaesthesia.     

Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine in young infants after continuous epidural infusion

This study reports plasma bupivacaine concentration in seven infants who during major abdominal surgery received lumbar epidural or caudal block anaesthesia. Plasma concentrations (CP) were measured postoperatively after six and twelve h of continuous infusion. Postnatal age ranged from one day to seven months. The local anaesthetic block was performed after induction of anaesthesia. Postoperatively bupivacaine 1.25-2.5 mg·ml^?1 without adrenaline was infused at a rate of 0.5 to 0.83 mg·kg^?1·h^?1. After six h of infusion the mean value measured was 1.59 μg·ml^?1 (range 1.2-1.94 μg·ml^?1). After 12 h the mean value measured was 2.06 μg·ml^?1 (range 1.53-2.98 μg·ml^?1). A marked increase in bupivacaine plasma concentration was seen between six and 12 hours of infusion. Bupivacaine plasma concentration never exceeded 4 μg·ml^?1. Adverse effects that possibly were due to a toxic reaction to bupivacaine were seen in three patients. In conclusion, the dose administered in this study appears to be high and cannot be recommended as safe dosage in this age group.;     

A comparison of intramuscular tenoxicam with intramuscular morphine for pain relief following tonsillectomy in children

A double blind trial was conducted to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of intramuscular tenoxicam for pain relief following tonsillectomy in children. Fifty children, aged 3–10 years, were randomly allocated to receive intramuscular tenoxicam 0.75 mg·kg^?1 or intramuscular morphine sulphate 0.2 mg·kg^?1 after induction of anaesthesia. Although the tenoxicam group required significantly more postoperative morphine (mean 57.8 μg·kg^?1 compared with 26.9 μg·kg^?1, P=0.025), the total morphine dose was significantly reduced after tenoxicam (57.8 μg·kg^?1 compared with 226.9 ug·kg^?1, P<0.0001). There was no difference between the quality of analgesia after discharge from recovery. The incidence of postoperative vomiting was significantly reduced after tenoxicam (20%) compared with morphine (71%).     

Clonidine-mepivacaine mixture vs plain mepivacaine in paediatric surgery

In a double-blind study, 42 children, aged 1–10, undergoing general subumbilical surgery, were randomly allocated to two groups; they received, via caudal extradural, 1% mepivacaine 7 mg·kg^?1 and normal saline 1 ml (Group 1) and a mixture of 1% mepivacaine 7 mg·kg^?1 plus clonidine 2 μg·kg^?1 and normal saline up to 1 ml (Group 2) respectively. No significant difference was noticed in age, weight, duration of surgery and onset time of anaesthesia, blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation. Mean duration of analgesia (evaluated with ‘Broadman objective pain scale') was 143 min for Group 1 and 218 min for Group 2 (P < 0.05); the time of sedation (evaluated with a sedation score) was statistically longer in Group 2 (172 min vs 89 min in Group 1). This longer sedation is due both to the longer analgesia and partially to a side effect of clonidine. In conclusion the addition of 2 μg·kg^?1 of clonidine to mepivacaine prolongs the duration of caudal analgesia in children.     

Transcutaneous CO2 tension effects of clonidine in paediatric caudal analgesia

In adults, clonidine when added to bupivacaine, results in no detectable respiratory depressant effect except when carbon dioxide challenge is performed. However, to date no investigations have quantified this in children. Twenty-four children (nine months to seven years) were randomized in a double-blind study into two groups. After induction, a caudal block was performed with 1 ml·kg^?1 0.25% bupivacaine. Clonidine 1 μg·kg^?1 was added in the clonidine group, and 1 ml normal saline in the placebo group. Patients were monitored in the recovery room for three h from arrival to discharge with continuous pulse oximetry, respiratory rate, a trancutaneous CO₂ tension (tcPCO₂) every 15 min, and a four point sedation score every 30 min. Mean tcPCO₂ and respiratory rate values were not different between the two groups. Apnoea and desaturation less than 97% were not observed. The sedation score decreased with time in both groups, and the score time interval was significantly higher in the clonidine group (P<0.05). All the patients left the recovery room with a sedation score of 1, excepting four in the clonidine group with a sedation score of 2. Clonidine 1 μg·kg^?1 with 0.25% bupivacaine mixture in caudal analgesia in children did not induce an increase in tcPCO₂ despite prolonged sedation.     

Caudal bupivacaine-tramadol combination for postoperative analgesia in pediatric herniorrhaphy

BACKGROUND: Administration of bupivacaine caudally has been used for postoperative analgesia after urogenital, rectal and lower abdominal surgery in children. Caudal opioids may offer analgesic advantages over bupivacaine alone but have been associated with side effects such as respiratory depression. Tramadol is an analgesic assumed to lack a respiratory depressant effect and has been shown to provide effective, long-lasting analgesia after epidural administration in adults and children. The aim of this study was to determine whether the addition of tramadol to bupivacaine caudally prolongs the duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone, with respect to side effects, and whether caudal tramadol alone provides satisfactory analgesia. METHODS: Sixty boys, aged 12-84 months, undergoing unilateral herniorrhaphy, were allocated randomly to three groups. Children in group B received 0.25% plain bupivacaine 1 ml kg(-1), group BT received an identical local anesthetic dose mixed with tramadol 1.5 mg kg(-1) and group T received caudal tramadol 1.5 mg kg(-1) in 0.9% sodium chloride in the same total volume (1 ml kg(-1)). Pain and demeanour assessments were made 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h after recovery from anesthesia with reference to a three-point scale. RESULTS: Analgesia time (time between caudal injection and first administration of analgesic) in group BT (13.5+/-2.2 h) was significantly longer than in the other two groups (P<0.05). In group T, more patients required additional analgesia after surgery than in the other two groups (P<0.05). Pain scores in the three groups were similar up to 4 h after operation but the mean score in group T was higher than groups B and BT 4 and 6 h after operation (P<0.05). Significantly more patients who had received caudal bupivacaine alone or with tramadol had lower pain and demeanour scores during the first 24 h after operation compared with those in the tramadol group. CONCLUSION: Caudal administration of bupivacaine with the addition of tramadol resulted in superior analgesia with a longer period without demand for additional analgesics compared with caudal bupivacaine and tramadol alone without an increase of side effects.     

Analgesia for adenotonsillectomy in children: a comparison of morphine, ketamine and tramadol

Background : Establishment of good analgesia is of major concern in the postoperative period following adenotonsillectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of ketamine, morphine and tramadol on postoperative pain after adenotonsillectomy in children. Methods : Sixty children (age 5–12 years) scheduled for adenotonsillectomy were randomized into four groups to receive intravenously (i.v.) either 0.5 mg·kg^?1 ketamine hydrochloride (K), 0.1 mg·kg^?1 morphine hydrochloride (M), 1.5 mg·kg^?1 tramadol hydrochloride (T) or normal saline (S) in a volume of 4 ml during induction. After tracheal intubation 10 μg·kg^?1·min^?1 ketamine hydrochloride in group K and 0.6 ml·kg^?1·h^?1 saline i.v. in groups M, K and S were infused peroperatively. Postoperative analgesic requirements and side‐effects were recorded. Pain was assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) scores. Results : Heart rate increased significantly peroperatively only in group K. NRS at first and fifth minute in group M and at first minute in group T and K and CHEOPS score at first, fifth, 15th and 60th min in group M were found to be significantly lower than in the control group. The time to first analgesic requirement was significantly longer in group M compared with ketamine and the control group. Six children in group M, nine in group T, 11 in group K and 15 in group S needed additional analgesics. Conclusions : Morphine hydrochloride 0.1 mg·kg^?1 i.v. administered during induction of anaesthesia provides efficient pain relief in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.     

Post-herniorrhaphy pain in outpatients after preincision ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block during monitored anaesthesia care

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block (IHNB) with bupivacaine 0.25% on the postoperative analgesic requirement and recovery profile in outpatients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy with local anaesthetic infiltration. Thirty consenting healthy men undergoing elective unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy procedures were randomly assigned to receive an IHNB with either saline or bupivacaine according to a double-blind, IRB-approved protocol. All patients received midazolam, 2 mg iv, and fentanyl 25 μg iv, prior to injection of 30 ml of either bupivacaine 0.25% or saline through the oblique muscle approximately 1.5 cm medial to the anterior superior iliac spine. Subsequently, the surgeon infiltrated the incision site with a lidocaine 1% solution. Sedation was maintained during the operation with a variable-rate propofol infusion, 25–140 μg · kg^?1 · min^?1. No significant differences were noted in the intraoperative doses of lidocaine, propofol and fentanyl in the two treatment groups. However, the pain visual analogue score at 30 min after entering the PACU was lower in the bupivacaine (versus saline) group (P < 0.05). Although the times to ambulation (86 ± 18 vs 99 ± 27 min) and being judged “fit for discharge” (112 ± 49 vs 126 ± 30 min) were similar in the two groups, the bupivacaine-treated (vs saline) patients required less oral analgesic medication after discharge (46% vs 85%). We concluded that the use of an ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block with bupivacaine 0.25% as an adjuvant during inguinal herniorrhaphy under monitored anaesthesia care decreased pain in the PACU and oral analgesic requirements after discharge from the day-surgery unit.     

The effects of caudal or intravenous clonidine on postoperative analgesia produced by caudal levobupivacaine in children

Background: Clonidine is used increasingly in pediatric anesthesia practice to prolong the duration of action of caudal block with a local anesthetic agent. Which route of administration of clonidine is the most beneficial remains unknown. We compared the effects of caudal and intravenous clonidine on postoperative analgesia produced by caudal levobupivacaine. Methods: Sixty ASA I and II children, aged 2–8 undergoing inguinal hernia repair or orchidopexy surgery received standardized premedication with midazolam and general anesthesia. The children were randomized in a double‐blind fashion to three groups. Group L (n = 20) patients received 0.75 ml·kg^?1 of caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine and i.v. 5 ml saline, Group L‐Ccau (n = 20) patients received 0.75 ml·kg^?1 of caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine + 2 μg·kg^?1 clonidine and i.v. 5 ml saline, Group L‐Civ (n = 20) patients received 0.75 ml·kg^?1 of caudal 0.25% levobupivacaine and i.v. 2 μg·kg^?1 clonidine in 5 ml of saline. Mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, and end‐tidal carbon dioxide values were recorded. Postoperative pain [Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) score], sedation (Ramsay Sedation Scale) and motor blockade (Modified Bromage Scale) were assessed at predetermined time points during the first 24 h after surgery. Results: Caudal clonidine significantly delayed the time to first rescue analgesic and fewer patients required rescue analgesia in the 24 h after surgery. No motor block was observed in any of the three groups on awakening or during the study period. In Group L‐Ccau, the CHIPPS score was lower than in Group L at all times through 240 min (P < 0.05), while the pain scores were lower in Group L‐Civ only at extubation and at 240 min (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Caudal clonidine prolongs the duration of analgesia produced by caudal levobupivacaine without causing significant side effects and this is because of a spinal mode of action.     

Unilateral groin surgery in children: will the addition of an ultrasound‐guided ilioinguinal nerve block enhance the duration of analgesia of a single‐shot caudal block?

Background: Inguinal hernia repair, hydrocelectomy, and orchidopexy are commonly performed surgical procedures in children. Postoperative pain control is usually provided with a single‐shot caudal block. Blockade of the ilioinguinal nerve may lead to additional analgesia. The aim of this double‐blind, randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of an adjuvant blockade of the ilioinguinal nerve using ultrasound (US) guidance at the end of the procedure with local anesthetic vs normal saline and to explore the potential for prolongation of analgesia with decreased need for postoperative pain medication. Methods: Fifty children ages 1–6 years scheduled for unilateral inguinal hernia repair, hydrocelectomy, orchidopexy, or orchiectomy were prospectively randomized into one of two groups: Group S that received an US‐guided ilioinguinal nerve block with 0.1 ml·kg^?1 of preservative‐free normal saline and Group B that received an US‐guided nerve block with 0.1 ml·kg^?1 of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 : 200 000 epinephrine at the conclusion of the surgery. After induction of anesthesia but prior to surgical incision, all patients received caudal anesthesia with 0.7 ml·kg^?1 of 0.125% bupivacaine with 1 : 200 000 epinephrine. Patients were observed by a blinded observer for (i) pain scores using the Children and Infants Postoperative Pain Scale, (ii) need for rescue medication in the PACU, (iii) need for oral pain medications given by the parents at home. Results: Forty‐eight patients, consisting of 46 males and two females, with a mean age of 3.98 (sd ± 1.88) were enrolled in the study. Two patients were excluded from the study because of study protocol violation and/or alteration in surgical procedure. The average pain scores reported for the entire duration spent in the recovery room for the caudal and caudal/ilioinguinal block groups were 1.92 (sd ± 1.59) and 1.18 (sd ± 1.31), respectively. The average pain score difference was 0.72 (sd ± 0.58) and was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In addition, when examined by procedure type, it was found that the difference in the average pain scores between the caudal and caudal/ilioinguinal block groups was statistically significant for the inguinal hernia repair patients (P < 0.05) but not for the other groin surgery patients (P = 0.13). For all groin surgery patients, six of the 23 patients in the caudal group and eight of the 25 patients in the caudal/ilioinguinal block group required pain rescue medications throughout their entire hospital stay or at home (P = 0.76). Overall, the caudal group received an average of 0.54 (sd ± 1.14) pain rescue medication doses, while the caudal/ilioinguinal block group received an average of 0.77 (sd ± 1.70) pain rescue medication doses; this was, however, not statistically significant (P = 0.58). Conclusions: The addition of an US‐guided ilioinguinal nerve block to a single‐shot caudal block decreases the severity of pain experienced by pediatric groin surgery patients. The decrease in pain scores were particularly pronounced in inguinal hernia repair patients.     

Caudal clonidine and bupivacaine for combined epidural and general anaesthesia in children

Background: Clonidine produces analgesia by actions on α₂-ad-renoceptors and enhances both sensory and motor blockade from epidural injection of local anaesthetics. Low-dose clonidine has been used so far for caudal injection in children. Our aim was to study the perioperative effects of high-dose caudal clonidine when added to low concentration of bupivacaine for combined epidural and general anaesthesia in children. Methods: After induction of general anaesthesia caudal block was performed either with 1 ml kg^-1 bupivacaine 0.175% with the addition of clonidine 5 μg kg^-1 (n=20), or with 1 ml kg^-1bupivacaine 0.175% (n=20). The intraoperative anaesthetic requirements, the perioperative haemodynamic effects, respiratory rate, sedation score, postoperative pain scores and side effects were assessed by a blinded observer. A patient-controlled analgesia system was used for postoperative pain relief. The quality of postoperative pain relief was assessed using Smiley's pain analogue scale. Results: Intraoperative haemodynamic responses did not differ between the groups. However, during emergence from general anaesthesia children in the clonidine group had significantly lower heart rates and blood pressures compared to children in the control group. In addition, heart rates and blood pressures were also lower in the clonidine group in the early postoperative period (P?< 0.05). Postoperative analgesia was significantly better in the clonidine group as evidenced by the total number of requests (3 vs 12, P< 0.05) and the total amount of tramadol (20.5 mg vs 72.8 mg, P < 0.05) administered. The duration of the caudal analgesia was significantly longer in the clonidine group (20.9±7.4 h vs 14.4±10.9 h, P< 0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that caudal clonidine 5 μg kg^-1 enhances and prolongs caudal blockade with bupivacaine 0.175% in children. It also blocks sympathoadrenergic responses during emergence from anaesthesia. Sedation and cardiovascular effects are observed up to 3 h into the postoperative period.