Safety and immunogenicity of high doses of quadrivalent influenza vaccine in children 6 months through <18 years of age: A randomized controlled phase II dose-finding trial

Quadrivalent high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (Fluzone® High-Dose Quadrivalent, IIV4-HD) was licensed in the USA in 2019 for adults ≥ 65 years of age. This Phase II study examined safety and immunogenicity of 3 dose formulations of IIV4-HD in healthy children. In a randomized, modified double-blind, active-controlled trial in the USA and Canada, 661 children aged 6 months through < 18 years received 1 or 2 doses intramuscularly of standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4-SD; 15 µg HA/strain), IIV4-HD at 3 dose levels (30, 45, and 60 µg HA/strain), or adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aIIV3, 7.5 µg HA/strain). Rates of unsolicited AEs were similar irrespective of dose. No treatment-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. Reactogenicity was slightly higher for IIV4-HD than IIV4-SD, although most solicited reactions were grade 1 or 2. Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and seroneutralization antibody titers were measured 28–35 days after each dose. Geometric mean HAI titers increased with increasing hemagglutinin dose, especially in children 6 months through < 3 years. For IIV4-HD 60 µg, in participants 6 months through < 18 years of age, the geometric mean titer ratio (95% confidence interval) versus IIV4-SD was 1.35 (0.94, 1.94) for A/H1N1, 2.51 (1.77, 3.55) for A/H3N2, 1.60 (1.17, 2.18) for B/Victoria, and 1.51 (1.13, 2.03) for B/Yamagata. The GMT ratio (95% confidence interval) for IIV4-HD 60 µg versus IIV4-SD was highest for participants 6 months through < 3 years of age: 4.24 (2.05, 8.76) for A/H1N1, 3.14 (1.53, 6.44) for A/H3N2, 2.04 (1.10, 3.77) for B/Victoria, and 1.92 (1.08, 3.41) for B/Yamagata; similarly, seroneutralization antibody GMT ratio was highest in these participants: 170 (84.6, 340) for A/H1N1, 7.13 (4.90, 10.4) for A/H3N2, 35.8 (22.1, 58.1) for B/Victoria, and 22.7 (14.7, 35.0) for B/Yamagata. This study showed that IIV4-HD (60 µg HA/strain) provides improved immunogenicity without affecting vaccine safety in children.     

Safety and immunogenicity of high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in adults 50–64 years of age

BackgroundIndividuals 50–64 years of age have reduced immune responses to influenza vaccines. The current study examined whether a high-dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3-HD) might improve immune responses over a standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3-SD) in this age group.MethodsThis was a multicenter, observer-blinded, randomized, active-controlled phase II trial. Adults 50–64 years of age were randomized 1:1 to receive IIV3-HD or IIV3-SD. Hemagglutination inhibition titers were measured before and 28 days after vaccination. Reactogenicity was recorded for 7 days after vaccination and adverse events for 28 days.Results148 participants received IIV3-HD and 152 received IIV3-SD. For all vaccine strains, day 28 geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition titers were significantly higher in the IIV3-HD group than in the IIV3-SD group (geometric mean titer ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.43 [1.04–1.97] for A/H1N1, 1.65 [1.21–2.25] for A/H3N2, and 1.60 [1.23–2.08] for B). Seroconversion rates were significantly higher in the IIV3-HD group than in the IIV3-SD group for strains A/H3N2 and B but not A/H1N1 (difference [95% CI] = 13.5% [4.76–22.0] for A/H3N2, 23.1% [11.7–33.6] for B, and −0.2% [−9.66 to 9.18] for A/H1N1). The post-vaccination seroprotection rate was significantly higher in the IIV3-HD group than in the IIV3-SD group for strain B but not for strains A/H1N1 or A/H3N2 (difference = 9.1% [2.95–15.7] for B, 2.0% [−0.907 to 5.68] for A/H1N1, and 0.6% [−3.14 to 4.43] for A/H3N2). Reactogenicity was higher in the IIV3-HD group than in the IIV3-SD group, but reactions were mostly of low intensity, transient, and self-limited. Rates of unsolicited adverse events were similar between groups. No serious AEs, AEs leading to early withdrawal, or deaths were reported.ConclusionsThe study suggests that in adults 50–64 years of age, IIV3-HD may improve immunogenicity compared to IIV3-SD while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.     

A randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine given concomitantly with trivalent influenza vaccine in adults aged ≥65 years

This randomized, double-blind study evaluated concomitant administration of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in adults aged ≥65 years who were naïve to 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. Patients (N = 1160) were randomized 1:1 to receive PCV13 + TIV followed by placebo, or Placebo + TIV followed by PCV13 at 0 and 1 months, with blood draws at 0, 1, and 2 months. Slightly lower pneumococcal serotype-specific anticapsular polysaccharide immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentrations were observed with PCV13 + TIV relative to PCV13. Concomitant PCV13 + TIV demonstrates acceptable immunogenicity and safety compared with either agent given alone.     

Safety and immunogenicity of hepatitis E vaccine in elderly people older than 65 years

BackgroundHepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is a leading cause of acute hepatitis worldwide, and results in high morbidity and mortality rates among elderly people in China. The hepatitis E vaccine, Hecolin®, has been shown to be safe and highly efficacious among healthy adults aged 16–65 years old. However, there is no data about Hecolin® vaccination in elderly people older than 65 years (y).MethodsAn open-labeled, controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Hecolin® among the elderly aged >65 y. A total of 601 eligible participants were enrolled. Among them, 200 elderly people aged >65 y and 201 adults aged 18–65 y were assigned to the Hecolin® groups and vaccinated at day 0, month 1 and month 6. Serum samples were collected for anti-HEV IgG determination at day 0 prior to immunization and at month 7. The remaining 200 elderly people aged >65 y were assigned to the safety control group and received no intervention but were instructed to report any adverse events that occurred during the whole study period in the same way as those in the Hecolin® groups.ResultsAfter receiving 3 doses of Hecolin® with the standard schedule, most (96.7%) of the vaccinated elderly people aged >65 y seroconverted at one month after the final dose (month 7). At month 7, the geometric mean concentrations of anti-HEV IgG were 5.36 (95% CI, 3.88–7.41) and 19.65 (95% CI, 16.81–22.98) among the baseline seronegative and seropositive elderly, respectively. Of the vaccinated elderly, 97.3% (177/182) had anti-HEV IgG levels higher than 1.0 WU/ml at month 7. Hecolin® was very well tolerated in this population. No vaccine-related SAEs were reported.ConclusionsHecolin® is immunogenic and well tolerated in elderly people aged greater than 65 years.     

Immunogenicity and safety of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine co-administered with the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in adults ≥50 years of age: A randomized trial

BackgroundThis study evaluated immunogenicity and safety of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) when the first dose was co-administered with the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) in adults aged ≥50 years.MethodsIn this open label, multi-center study (NCT02045836), participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either the first dose of RZV and PPSV23, co-administered at Day 0 and the second dose of RZV at Month 2 (Co-Ad group), or PPSV23 at Day 0, the first dose of RZV at Month 2 and second dose of RZV at Month 4 (Control group). Co-primary objectives were the RZV vaccine response rate (VRR) in the Co-Ad group and the non-inferiority of the antibody responses to RZV and PPSV23 in the Co-Ad group compared to the Control group. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed.Results865 participants were vaccinated (Co-Ad: 432, Control: 433). VRRs to RZV were >98% in both groups. Humoral immune responses to co-administration of RZV and PPSV23 were non-inferior to sequential administration. All three co-primary immunogenicity objectives were met. Solicited local symptoms after the first RZV dose were reported by similar percentages of participants in both groups. Solicited general symptoms were more frequently reported when the first dose of RZV and PPSV23 were co-administered. No differences were apparent between groups after the second RZV dose.ConclusionsNo immunologic interference was observed between RZV and PPSV23 when co-administered in adults ≥50 years. No safety concerns were raised.     

Safety and immunogenicity of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in pneumococcal vaccine-naïve adults ≥50 years of age

BackgroundPneumococcal disease remains a public health priority in adults. Safety and immunogenicity of 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15) containing 13 serotypes included in 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) plus 2 additional serotypes (22F and 33F) was evaluated in adults ≥50 years old (NCT01513551).Methods691 adults received one dose of PCV15, PCV13, or 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) and were followed 14 days for safety. Serotype-specific IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) geometric mean titers (GMTs) were measured immediately prior and 1-month postvaccination.ResultsSafety profiles were comparable across vaccination groups. PCV15 induced comparable levels of IgG GMCs and OPA GMTs to PCV13 and PPV23 for shared serotypes. Serotype-specific antibodies were numerically higher among recipients of PCV15 than PCV13 and PPV23 for 7 and 12 shared serotypes, respectively; and lower for 4 and 1 serotype(s), respectively. PCV15 induced higher IgG and OPA antibodies than PCV13 or PPV23 for serotypes unique to PCV15 (22F and 33F not in PCV13; 6A not in PPV23).ConclusionsPCV15 displayed an acceptable safety profile and induced IgG and OPA to all 15 serotypes included in the vaccine, at levels comparable to PCV13 and PPV23 for shared serotypes with these vaccines.Study identification: V114-002.CLINICALTRIALS.GOV identifier: NCT01513551.© 2018 Merck & Co., Inc.     

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity after 1 and 2 doses of zoster vaccine in healthy adults ≥60 years of age

Background

Incidence and severity of herpes zoster (HZ) and postherpetic neuralgia increase with age, associated with age-related decrease in immunity to varicella-zoster virus (VZV). One dose of zoster vaccine (ZV) has demonstrated substantial protection against HZ; this study examined impact of a second dose of ZV.

Methods

Randomized, double-blind, multicenter study with 210 subjects ≥60 years old compared immunity and safety profiles after one and two doses of ZV, separated by 6 weeks, vs. placebo. Immunogenicity was evaluated using VZV interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay and VZV glycoprotein enzyme-linked immunosorbent antibody (gpELISA) assay. Adverse experiences (AEs) were recorded on a standardized Vaccination Report Card.

Results

No serious vaccine-related AEs occurred. VZV IFN-γ ELISPOT geometric mean count (GMC) of spot-forming cells per 10⁶ peripheral blood mononuclear cells increased in the ZV group from 16.9 prevaccination to 49.5 and 32.8 at 2 and 6 weeks postdose 1, respectively. Two weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months postdose 2, GMC was 44.3, 42.9, and 36.5, respectively. GMC in the placebo group did not change during the study. The peak ELISPOT response occurred ∼2 weeks after each ZV dose. The gpELISA geometric mean titers (GMTs) in the ZV group were higher than in the placebo group at 6 weeks after each dose. Correlation between the IFN-γ ELISPOT and gpELISA assays was poor.

Conclusions

ZV was generally well-tolerated and immunogenic in adults ≥60 years old. A second dose of ZV was generally safe, but did not boost VZV-specific immunity beyond levels achieved postdose 1.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (GC3110A) in healthy participants aged ≥ 65 years

BackgroundSeasonal Influenza is still considered associated with seasonal morbidity and hospitalization in the elderly population. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) to reduce burden of two currently circulating influenza B lineages. Until 2019 Korean National Immunization Program (NIP) recommended trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) after ongoing debates on cost effectiveness of QIV for elderly population. Although influenza vaccine only showed modest effect on reducing influenza in elderly, this study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of inactivated QIV in healthy participants ≥ 65 years of age.MethodsA total of 274 healthy participants aged ≥ 65 years received a QIV. Seroconversion-based vaccine efficacy of 4 strains of seasonal influenza was assessed 21 days after vaccination and adverse events were monitored until 180 days after vaccination.ResultsThe percentages of participants seroconverted after vaccination on HI antibody against each strain were 36.5% (99/271) to A/H1N1, 47.6% (129/271) to A/H3N2, 40.6% (110/271) to B Yamagata, and 49.1% (133/271) to B Victoria. The percentages of participants seroprotected after vaccination on HI antibody against each strain were 81.2% (220/271) to A/H1N1, 98.5% (267/271) to A/H3N2, 95.2% (258/271) to B Yamagata, and 93.7% (254/271) to B Victoria. There was no serious adverse event (SAE) related with the study vaccine.ConclusionThe quadrivalent split influenza vaccine is expected to offer seroprotection against influenza A and both influenza B lineages even in the elderly population.     

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine: A randomized,double-blind,controlled phase III study in healthy population aged ≥3 years

Inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) containing two influenza A strains (H1N1 and H3N2) and one strain from each B lineage (Victoria and Yamagata) may offer broader protection against seasonal influenza. This study examined the immunogenicity and safety of a candidate IIV4. A randomized, double-blind, controlled phase III clinical trial was conducted in healthy subjects aged ≥3 years. Subjects were randomly assigned into three groups in a 2:1:1 ratio, receiving single dose of IIV4 or inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3) which contains either B/Victoria strain (BV) or B/Yamagata strain (BY). Blood samples were collected before and 28 days after vaccination to test hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies of the four influenza strains. Safety information was collected for 28 days after vaccination. A total of 2320 subjects (IIV4: 1160, IIV3-BV: 580, IIV3-BY: 580) were enrolled in this study. After vaccination, the seroconversion rates of IIV4 against H1N1, H3N2, BV and BY strains were 77.15%, 81.93%, 60.14% and 64.57%, respectively. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) against the four influenza strains were 523.91, 274.13, 115.35 and 257.81, respectively. The investigational IIV4 was non-inferiority to IIV3 for the four strains, meanwhile superior to IIV3 for additional B strains (B/BV, B/BY). For safety, there had no significant difference in the incidence of the adverse reactions among the three groups (P = 0.5986). No serious adverse events related to vaccination occurred. The IIV4 had good immunogenicity and safety, which added an influenza B protection with no increased safety concerns. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03853993)     

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine co-administered with a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine versus separate administration,in adults ≥50 years of age: Results from a phase III,randomized, non-inferiority trial

IntroductionWe compared co-administration versus separate administration of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4) with a 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) in adults at high risk of complications of influenza and pneumococcal infection.MethodsThis phase III, placebo-controlled, observer-blind trial (NCT02218697) was conducted in France and Belgium during the 2014–2015 influenza season. Adults ≥50 years of age meeting their country’s vaccination recommendations were randomized 1:1 to co-administration or separate administration. Immunogenicity was assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers for IIV4 and 22F-inhibition ELISA for PPV23. Co-primary objectives were to demonstrate non-inferiority of co-administration versus separate administration in terms of geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio for each influenza strain in the IIV4 and geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio for six pneumococcal serotypes (1, 3, 4, 7F, 14, 19A) in the PPV23 in the per-protocol cohort (N = 334).ResultsThe study met its co-primary objectives, with the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the GMT and GMC ratios (separate administration over co-administration) being ≤2.0 for all four antigens of the IIV4 and the six pre-selected serotypes of the PPV23, respectively. Immunogenicity of the IIV4 and PPV23 was similar regardless of administration schedule. In a post hoc analysis pooling participants ≥60 years of age from the co-administration and separate administration groups, IIV4 immunogenicity was similar in higher risk adults with comorbidities (diabetes; respiratory, heart, kidney, liver, or neurological diseases; morbid obesity) versus those without. Both vaccines had an acceptable safety and reactogenicity profile; pain was the most common symptom, occurring more often with co-administration than separate administration.ConclusionThe IIV4 and PPV23 can be co-administered without reducing antibody responses reflecting protection against influenza or pneumococcal disease. Co-administration of PPV23 at the annual influenza vaccination visit may improve uptake. Comorbidities had no impact on IIV4 immunogenicity, supporting its value in older adults with chronic medical conditions.Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT02218697.     

A randomized phase 3 trial to assess the immunogenicity and safety of 3 consecutively produced lots of freeze-dried MVA-BN® vaccine in healthy adults

Since vaccination remains the only effective protection against orthopox virus-induced diseases such as smallpox or monkeypox, the strategic use and stockpiling of these vaccines remains of significant public health importance. The approved liquid-frozen formulation of Bavarian Nordic's Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA-BN) smallpox vaccine has specific cold-chain requirements, while the freeze-dried (FD) formulation of this vaccine provides more flexibility in terms of storage conditions and shelf life.In this randomized phase 3 trial, the immunogenicity and safety of 3 consecutively manufactured lots of the FD MVA-BN vaccine was evaluated. A total of 1129 healthy adults were randomized to 3 treatment groups (lots 1 to 3) and received 2 vaccinations 4 weeks apart.For both neutralizing and total antibodies, a robust increase of geometric mean titer (GMT) was observed across all lot groups 2 weeks following the second vaccination, comparable to published data. For the primary results, the ratios of the neutralizing antibody GMTs between the lot group pairs ranged from 0.936 to 1.115, with confidence ratios well within the pre-specified margin of equivalence. Results for total antibodies were similar. In addition, seroconversion rates were high across the 3 lots, ranging between 99.1 % and 99.7 %.No safety concerns were identified; particularly, no inflammatory cardiac disorders were detected. The most common local solicited adverse events (AEs) reported across lot groups were injection site pain (87.2%) and erythema (73.2%), while the most common general solicited adverse events were myalgia, fatigue, and headache in 40.6% to 45.5% of all participants, with no meaningful differences among the lot groups. No related serious AEs were reported.In conclusion, the data demonstrate consistent and robust immunogenicity and safety results with a freeze-dried formulation of MVA-BN.Clinical Trial Registry Number: NCT03699124.     

Safety and immunogenicity of a 9-valent HPV vaccine in females 12–26 years of age who previously received the quadrivalent HPV vaccine

ObjectivesTo assess the safety and immunogenicity of the investigational 9-valent (6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) HPV (9vHPV) vaccine in prior recipients of a 3-dose regimen of quadrivalent (6/11/16/18) HPV (qHPV) vaccine.MethodsV503-006 was a randomized, double-blinded, safety/tolerability and immunogenicity study of the 9vHPV vaccine in females 12–26 years of age who were previously vaccinated with qHPV vaccine. Subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 3 doses of 9vHPV vaccine (n = 618) or saline placebo (n = 306) at day 1, month 2, and month 6. Systemic, injection-site and serious adverse experiences (AEs) were monitored. Serum samples were collected at day 1, month 2, and month 7. Anti-HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 titers were measured using the 9-valent HPV competitive Luminex Immunoassay (cLIA).ResultsThe frequency of injection-site AEs (days 1–5 following any vaccination) was higher in the 9vHPV vaccine group than in the placebo group (91.1% and 43.9%, respectively). The frequencies of vaccine-related systemic AEs (days 1–15 following any vaccination) were generally comparable between the 2 groups (30.6% in the 9vHPV vaccine group, and 25.9% in the placebo group). One vaccine-related serious AE was reported in each of the 9vHPV vaccine and placebo groups. Few subjects (9vHPV = 0.5%; placebo = 0%) discontinued due to an AE. At 4 weeks post-dose 3, over 98% of subjects in the 9vHPV vaccine group were seropositive for HPV types 31/33/45/52/58, with marked elevations in cLIA geometric mean titers (GMTs) to these HPV types. Anti-HPV 31/33/45/52/58 GMTs were lower than in subjects administered 9vHPV vaccine who had not previously received qHPV vaccine (based on cross-study analyses); the clinical significance of this difference is unknown.ConclusionsAdministration of a 3-dose regimen of 9vHPV vaccine to adolescent girls and young women 12–26 years of age who are prior qHPV vaccine recipients is highly immunogenic with respect to HPV types 31/33/45/52/58 and generally well tolerated.     

Safety and immunogenicity of ricin vaccine,RVEc™, in a Phase 1 clinical trial

Ricin is a potent toxin and potential bioterrorism weapon for which no specific licensed countermeasures are available. We report the safety and immunogenicity of the ricin vaccine RVEc™ in a Phase 1 (N = 30) multiple-dose, open-label, non-placebo-controlled, dose-escalating (20, 50, and 100 μg), single-center study. Each subject in the 20- and 50-μg dose groups (n = 10 for each group) received three injections at 4-week intervals and was observed carefully for untoward effects of the vaccine; blood was drawn at predetermined intervals after each dose for up to 1 year. RVEc™ was safe and well tolerated at the 20- and 50-μg doses. The most common adverse events were pain at the injection site and headache. Of the 10 subjects who received a single 100-μg dose, two developed elevated creatine phosphokinase levels, which resolved without sequelae. No additional doses were administered to subjects in the 100-μg group. Immunogenicity of the vaccine was evaluated by measuring antibody response using the well standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and toxin neutralization assay (TNA). Of the subjects in the 20- and 50-μg dose groups, 100% achieved ELISA anti-ricin IgG titers of 1:500 to 1:121,500 and 50% produced neutralizing anti-ricin antibodies measurable by TNA. Four subjects in the 50-μg group received a single booster dose of RVEc™ 20–21 months after the initial dose. The single booster was safe and well tolerated, resulting in no serious adverse events, and significantly enhanced immunogenicity of the vaccine in human subjects. Each booster recipient developed a robust anamnestic response with ELISA anti-ricin IgG titers of 1:13,500 to 1:121,500 and neutralizing antibody titers of 1:400 to 1:3200. Future studies will attempt to optimize dose, scheduling, and route of administration. This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01317667 and NCT01846104).     

Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated enterovirus A71 vaccine in children 3–6 years and 2–35 months of age- an open-label,randomized phase IIb clinical trial

BackgroundEnterovirus A71 (EV-A71) infection can cause severe debilitating complications and even death in young children. The immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated whole EV-A71 virus vaccine were assessed in children 2 months to 6 years of age.MethodsThis was an open-label, multi-center and randomized phase IIb study, which divided into part A and B. In part A, children 36 months to 6 years of age were enrolled and randomized into 3 groups, receiving 0.5 μg total viral protein (TP) with adjuvant Al(OH)3, 1.0 μg TP with Al(OH)3 or 1.0 μg TP only. Two doses of vaccines were administered at a 28-day interval and blood was taken before immunization, at week 4, 8, 28 and 52 (optional) for virus neutralization assay. Safety profiles were also monitored. After safety profiles had shown no concerns, children 2 months to 35 months of age (part B) were subsequently enrolled following the same protocol.ResultsA total of 135 children completed two doses of immunization, including 58 in part A and 77 in part B. Both adjuvanted 0.5 μg and 1.0 μg TP elicited significant raise of neutralizing antibody titers and seroconversion rate was up to 93.75–100.0% after 2 doses of immunization. Adjuvanted 1.0 μg TP induced higher titers of neutralizing antibodies than adjuvanted 0.5 μg TP. By contrast, non-adjuvanted 1.0 μg TP was not immunogenic. No major adverse events were reported.ConclusionsThis EV-A71 vaccine containing adjuvant is immunogenic and safe in children 2 months to 6 years of age.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03268083.     

Safety and immunogenicity of revaccination with reduced dose intradermal and standard dose intramuscular influenza vaccines in adults 18–64 years of age

Background

This clinical trial examined the safety and immunogenicity of annual revaccination with Fluzone^® Intradermal (Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA) vaccine compared to a standard intramuscular (IM) split-virion trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone^®, Sanofi Pasteur).

Methods

This phase II, active-controlled, multi-centre, open-label trial was conducted in 2009 and 2010, and enrolled 1250 adults 18–64 years of age who were randomly selected from participants in a phase III influenza vaccine trial the previous year (NCT00772109). Subjects who had previously received the ID vaccine were randomized 2:1 to be revaccinated with the ID or IM vaccine and those who previously received the IM vaccine were randomized 1:1. Solicited reactions were recorded on the day of vaccination and continuing for the next 7 days, non-serious adverse events for 28 days, and serious adverse events for 6 months after vaccination. Hemagglutination inhibition antibody titres were assessed pre-vaccination and at day 28.

Results

Reactions were well-tolerated and resolved in the first 7 days, but erythema, induration, swelling, pruritus and ecchymosis were reported by more subjects receiving the ID vaccine than the IM vaccine. Compared to receipt of IM vaccine in the previous year, ID vaccine in the previous year led to statistically higher rates of erythema, swelling and induration after IM vaccine in the second year. Injection-site pain and systemic reactions did not differ between ID and IM vaccines. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Geometric mean antibody titres, seroprotection rates, and seroconversion rates were non-inferior for the ID and IM vaccines for all three viral strains.

Conclusions

The ID vaccine was as immunogenic as the IM vaccine, and raised no safety concerns. It can be used interchangeably with the IM vaccine for annual revaccination in adults 18–64 years of age in consecutive years without safety concerns.     

Safety and immunogenicity of different Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile vaccine formulations in two early phase randomized studies of healthy adults aged 50–85 years

BackgroundTwo phase 1/phase 2 studies assessed 2 formulations of investigational bivalent Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile vaccine (QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid and toxoid-alone) in healthy adults 50–85 years of age.MethodsThe QS-21 adjuvanted toxoid vaccine study randomized subjects 3:1 to 100 μg QS-21–containing C difficile vaccine or placebo administered in a shortened-month (Months 0, 1, 3) or day (Days 1, 8, 30) regimen. The toxoid-alone vaccine study randomized subjects 3:3:1 to receive 100 or 200 μg unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stages 1 and 2 (sentinel cohorts of different age groups), and 3:1 to receive the selected dose of unadjuvanted C difficile vaccine formulation or placebo in Stage 3 (Days 1, 8, 30). Safety was the primary outcome for both studies. Immunogenicity was determined by measuring serum toxin A– and B–specific neutralizing antibodies.ResultsIn the day regimen, 10 reports across both studies of grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 triggered predefined stopping rules. Local reactions in both studies were more common among vaccine versus placebo recipients. Injection site pain predominated and was generally mild in severity. Systemic events were infrequent and generally mild-to-moderate in severity. Adverse events were reported by 50.0%–75.0% and 16.7%–50.0% of subjects in the QS-21 and toxoid-alone studies, respectively. Immune responses peaked around Day 37 (shortened-month regimen) or between Day 15 and Month 2 (day regimen) and remained above baseline throughout follow-up.ConclusionsBoth formulations demonstrated robust immunogenicity. Both studies stopped early due to grade 3 injection site redness postdose 2 of the day regimen; neither formulation progressed to later stage development. Instead, an aluminum hydroxide-containing formulation of the vaccine candidate administered at 0, 1, and 6 months, which was safe and immunogenic in phase 1 and 2 studies, advanced to phase 3 studies.     

Safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted inactivated split-virion and whole-virion influenza A (H5N1) vaccines in children: A phase I–II randomized trial

Objective

Highly pathogenic avian influenza A virus H5N1 has the potential to cause a pandemic. Many prototype pandemic influenza A (H5N1) vaccines had been developed and well evaluated in adults in recent years. However, data in children are limited. Herein we evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of adjuvanted split-virion and whole-virion H5N1 vaccines in children.

Methods

An open-labelled phase I trial was conducted in children aged 3–11 years to receive aluminum-adjuvated, split-virion H5N1 vaccine (5–30 μg) and in children aged 12–17 years to receive aluminum-adjuvated, whole-virion H5N1 vaccine (5–15 μg). Safety of the two formulations was assessed. Then a randomized phase II trial was conducted, in which 141 children aged 3–11 years received the split-virion vaccine (10 or 15 μg) and 280 children aged 12–17 years received the split-virion vaccine (10–30 μg) or the whole-virion vaccine (5 μg). Serum samples were collected for hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) assays.

Findings

5–15 μg adjuvated split-virion vaccines were well tolerated in children aged 3–11 years and 5–30 μg adjuvated split-virion vaccines and 5 μg adjuvated whole-virion vaccine were well tolerated in children aged 12–17 years. Most local and systemic reactions were mild or moderate. Before vaccination, all participants were immunologically naïve to H5N1 virus. Immune responses were induced after the first dose and significantly boosted after the second dose. In 3–11 years children, the 10 and 15 μg split-virion vaccine induced similar responses with 55% seroconversion and seroprotection (HI titer ≥1:40) rates. In 12–17 years children, the 30 μg split-virion vaccine induced the highest immune response with 71% seroconversion and seroprotection rates. The 5 μg whole-virion vaccine induced higher response than the 10 μg split-virion vaccine did.

Interpretation

The aluminum-adjuvanted, split-virion prototype pandemic influenza A (H5N1) vaccine showed good safety and immunogenicity in children and 30 μg dose induced immune response complying with European Union licensure criteria. [ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00900588 and NCT00900991].     

Safety of quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in subjects aged 2–49 years

BackgroundQuadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (Q/LAIV) was licensed in 2012 and replaced trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in the United States during the 2013–2014 influenza season. This study assessed the safety of Q/LAIV in children and adults aged 2–49 years.MethodsThis was a prospective observational cohort study using data collected from Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Post-vaccination events of interest were any hospitalization, hospitalization for lower respiratory tract infection, and the following medically attended events: hypersensitivity, seizures/convulsions, lower respiratory tract infection, wheezing, Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s palsy, encephalitis, neuritis, vasculitis, and narcolepsy/cataplexy. The rates of these events during the risk interval post-vaccination were compared with rates observed during reference periods later in the follow-up (within-cohort analysis) and with rates observed in frequency-matched unvaccinated controls and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) recipients.ResultsA total of 62,040 eligible Q/LAIV recipients were identified during the 2013–2014 influenza season. Within-cohort comparisons of all Q/LAIV recipients as well as comparisons between Q/LAIV recipients and unvaccinated controls or IIV recipients did not show any significantly higher risk of hospitalizations or medically attended events following administration of Q/LAIV. Additional analyses by setting (clinic visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions) and age group (2–4, 5–8, 9–17, and 18–49 years) also did not reveal clinically consistent findings that suggested any increased risk after administration of Q/LAIV.ConclusionIn this large population study of individuals aged 2–49 years, no safety signals associated with the administration of Q/LAIV were observed. A much larger study population would be needed to confidently reject any association between Q/LAIV and very rare events, specifically those with an incidence of <1 event/10,000 person-years.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01985997