Genetic diversity of G9 rotavirus strains circulating among diarrheic children in North India: A comparison with 116E rotavirus vaccine strain

The parental rotavirus strain 116E (G9P[11]) used to generate Rotavac® vaccine was isolated in 1986 in New Delhi. Thenceforward, there is no comprehensive report on diversity of G9 rotavirus strains from 116E; therefore, the present study evaluates the VP7 gene sequence diversity of G9 strains (retrieved from GenBank) from different geographical regions (1987–2016). Additionally, 22 recently collected G9 strains from Himachal Pradesh and Delhi (2013–2016) were included in the phylogenetic analysis. Interestingly, unlike 116E which belong to lineage-II all other G9 rotavirus including these 22 samples clustered together in a separate lineage (III). Further, six amino acid substitutions including one novel, K143M (epitope 7-2) different from 116E were detected mostly in the neutralization epitopes of VP7 protein (neutralization escape mutants). Overall, the accumulation of identified substitutions in VP7 epitopes and evolution of G9 strains in India may have impact on Rotavac® efficacy.     

Economic evaluation of the introduction of rotavirus vaccine in Hong Kong

BackgroundRotavirus is a common cause of severe gastroenteritis in young children in Hong Kong (HK) with a high economic burden. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing rotavirus vaccination into the HK Government’s Childhood Immunisation Programme (CIP) and to include the potential protective effect of the vaccine against seizures.MethodsA decision-support model was customised to estimate the potential impact, cost-effectiveness and benefit-risk of rotavirus vaccination in children below 5 years over the period 2020–2029 in HK. Two doses of Rotarix® and three doses of RotaTeq® were each compared to no vaccination. Rotavirus treatment costs were calculated from a governmental health sector perspective (i.e., costs of public sector treatment) and an overall health sector perspective (both governmental and patient, i.e., costs of public sector treatment, private sector treatment, transport and diapers). We ran probabilistic and deterministic uncertainty analyses.ResultsIntroduction of rotavirus vaccination in HK could prevent 49,000 (95% uncertainty interval: ~44,000–54,000) hospitalisations of rotavirus gastroenteritis and seizures and result in ~50 (95% uncertainty interval: ~25–85) intussusception hospitalisations, over the period 2020–2029 (a benefit-risk ratio of ~1000:1), compared to a scenario with no public or private sector vaccine use. The discounted vaccination cost would be US$51–57 million over the period 2020–2029 based on per-course prices of US$72 (Rotarix®) or US$78 (RotaTeq®), but this would be offset by discounted treatment cost savings of US$70 million (government) and US$127 million (governmental and patient health sector). There was a greater than 94% probability that the vaccine could be cost-saving irrespective of the vaccine product or perspective considered. All deterministic ‘what-if’ scenarios were cost-saving from an overall health sector perspective (governmental and patient).ConclusionsRotavirus vaccination is likely to be cost-saving and have a favourable benefit-risk profile in HK. Based on the assumptions made, our analysis supports its introduction into CIP.     

Dynamics of G2P[4] strain evolution and rotavirus vaccination: A review of evidence for Rotarix

Rotavirus (RV) gastroenteritis is a vaccine-preventable disease that creates high medical and economic burden in both developed and developing countries. Worldwide, more than 100 countries have introduced RV vaccines in their national immunization programs, and the remarkable impact of reducing the burden of severe childhood gastroenteritis has been unequivocally demonstrated. Currently, 2 oral vaccines (Rotarix, GSK and RotaTeq, Merck) are widely utilized. Recent temporary increases in the relative prevalence of G2P[4] RV strains have been observed in countries implementing RV vaccination. This comprehensive literature review aims to provide an insight on RV genotype evolution in the context of mass vaccination with Rotarix, particularly in the case of G2P[4]. In the post-vaccine era, strain surveillance data indicated temporal and spatial changes in countries both with and without RV vaccination programs. Annual fluctuations in G2P[4] prevalence seem to occur naturally, with no substantial differences between countries using Rotarix, RotaTeq or mixed vaccination programs. Moreover, Rotarix has been shown to be efficacious and effective against gastroenteritis caused by non-vaccine strains, including G2P[4]. These data indicate that shifts in RV genotype distribution are likely to constitute an inherent process of virus evolution to infect the human gut. Following RV vaccine introduction, incidences of RV gastroenteritis declined dramatically and mass vaccination will likely maintain this status, despite possible fluctuations in the relative distribution of genotypes. There is no conclusive evidence of unusual burst of new or vaccine-escape strains since global RV vaccines use. The emergence of strains with a potential to increase the current burden of RV disease should be continuously monitored and can only be established by exhaustive characterization of strains, including whole genomic sequencing. Given the natural fluctuations in RV strains over time, caution is advised when interpreting temporal changes in RV strain dynamics, as they could mistakenly be attributed to vaccination.     

Impact of rotavirus vaccine on paediatric rotavirus hospitalisation and intussusception in New Zealand: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundRotavirus results in a significant burden of hospitalisations and deaths globally. Rotavirus vaccine has been used in New Zealand since July 2014. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of RotaTeq® vaccine in New Zealand between 2006 and 2016.MethodsA national cohort study of 723,695 children aged less than 6 years was carried out using linked administrative datasets. Study outcomes were hospitalisation for intussusception, rotavirus, and all-cause gastroenteritis. Intussusception hospitalisation rates were calculated from 2006 to 2016, and rotavirus and all-cause gastroenteritis hospitalisation rates from 2011 to 2016. We examined the effect of RotaTeq® vaccination on rotavirus and all-cause gastroenteritis hospitalisation rates using Poisson regression. Adjusted incidence rate ratios controlled for sex, year of birth, ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and district health board area.ResultsSignificant reductions in the incidence of rotavirus hospitalisation were seen in all age groups, ethnicities, and deprivation following the introduction of RotaTeq®. There was a 92.6% reduction in hospitalisation incidence in the vaccinated cohort (p < 0.0001). There was also a 48% reduction in all-cause gastroenteritis hospitalisation incidence in the vaccinated cohort (p < 0.0001). The average annual intussusception rate in children aged less than 3 years was 26.2 per 100,000, with no significant change over time (p = 0.847).ConclusionsIn New Zealand the introduction of RotaTeq® resulted in a significant reduction in rotavirus hospitalisation, and a halving in all-cause gastroenteritis hospitalisation. There has been no change in the overall incidence of intussusception or clear change in patterns of cases, although intussusception cases did occur within risk period immediately post vaccine.     

Rotavirus strain distribution in Ghana pre- and post- rotavirus vaccine introduction

BackgroundGhana introduced the monovalent rotavirus vaccine (Rotarix) into its national paediatric vaccination programme in May2012. Vaccine introduction was initiated nationwide and achieved >85% coverage within a few months. Rotavirus strain distribution pre- and post-RV vaccine introduction is reported.MethodsStool samples were collected from diarrhoeic children <5 years of age hospitalized between 2009 and 2016 at sentinel sites across Ghana and analyzed for the presence of group A rotavirus by enzyme immunoassay. Rotavirus strains were characterized by RT-PCR and sequencing.ResultsA total of 1363 rotavirus EIA-positive samples were subjected to molecular characterization. These were made up of 823 (60.4%) and 540 (39.6%) samples from the pre- and post-vaccine periods respectively. Rotavirus VP7 genotypes G1, G2 and G3, and VP4 genotypes P[6] and P[8] constituted more than 65% of circulating G and P types in the pre–vaccine period. The common strains detected were G1P[8] (20%), G3P[6] (9.2%) and G2P[6] (4.9%).During the post-vaccine period, G12, G1 and G10 genotypes, constituted more than 65% of the VP7 genotypes whilst P[6] and P[8] made up more than 75% of the VP4 genotypes. The predominant circulating strains were G12P[8] (26%), G10P[6] (10%) G3P[6] (8.1%) and G1P[8] (8.0%). We also observed the emergence of the unusual rotavirus strain G9P[4] during this period.ConclusionRotavirus G1P[8], the major strain in circulation during the pre-vaccination era, was replaced by G12P[8] as the most predominant strain after vaccine introduction. This strain replacement could be temporary and unrelated to vaccine introduction since an increase in G12 was observed in countries yet to introduce the rotavirus vaccine in West Africa. A continuous surveillance programme in the post-vaccine era is necessary for the monitoring of circulating rotavirus strains and the detection of unusual/emerging genotypes.     

Risk of intussusception after monovalent rotavirus vaccine (Rotavac) in Indian infants: A self-controlled case series analysis

BackgroundAn association between rotavirus vaccination and intussusception has been documented in post-licensure studies in some countries. We evaluated the risk of intussusception associated with monovalent rotavirus vaccine (Rotavac) administered at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age in India.MethodsActive prospective surveillance for intussusception was conducted at 22 hospitals across 16 states from April 2016 through September 2017. Data on demography, clinical features and vaccination were documented. Age-adjusted relative incidence for 1–7, 8–21, and 1–21 days after rotavirus vaccination in children aged 28–364 days at intussusception onset was estimated using the self-controlled case-series (SCCS) method. Only Brighton Collaboration level 1 cases were included.ResultsOut of 670 children aged 2–23 months with intussusception, 311 (46.4%) children were aged 28–364 days with confirmed vaccination status. Out of these, 52 intussusception cases with confirmed receipt of RVV were included in the SCCS analysis. No intussusception case was observed within 21 days of dose 1. Only one case occurred during 8–21 days after the dose 2. Post-dose 3, two cases in 1–7 days and 7 cases during 8–21 days period were observed. There was no increased risk of intussusception during 1–7 days after the doses 1 and 2 (zero cases observed) or dose 3 (relative incidence [RI], 1.71 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.0–5.11]). Similarly, no increased risk during 8–21 days after the dose 1 (zero cases observed), dose 2 (RI, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.0–3.28]) or dose 3 (RI, 2.52 [95% CI, 0.78–5.61]). The results were similar for 1–21 day periods after the doses separately or pooled.ConclusionsThe risk of intussusception during the first 21 days after any dose of rotavirus vaccine (Rotavac) was not higher among the Indian infants than the background risk, based on limited SCCS analysis of 52 children.     

Validation of parental reports of rotavirus vaccination of their children compared to the national immunization registry

BackgroundThe introduction of rotavirus vaccines into national immunization programs necessitates vaccine effectiveness evaluations. Parental report of vaccination status is a simple and accessible source of information; however, its validity is unclear.AimsTo validate parental reports of rotavirus immunization compared to documentation of vaccination in national immunization registry, and to assess vaccine effectiveness by each method.MethodsParents of 1272 children aged 2–59 months from northern Israel hospitalized for gastroenteritis in 2011–2015 were interviewed on the sociodemographics and rotavirus vaccination status of their child. Rotavirus immunization status based on parental report was compared to that documented in the national immunization registry, which was considered the gold standard. Stool samples collected from patients were tested for rotavirus antigen by immunochromotgraphy. In a rotavirus test-negative case-control study, vaccination history was compared between children found positive for rotavirus and those who tested negative. Vaccine effectiveness for ≥ 1 dose vs. zero doses was calculated as: (1-adjusted odds ratio) * 100.ResultsThe sensitivity and specificity of parental report of their child's immunization with a rotavirus vaccine were 97% (95% CI 96–98), and 75% (95% CI 65–82), respectively. Kappa coefficient was 0.69 (p < 0.001) for the agreement between the two methods. Rotavirus vaccine effectiveness was 72% (95% CI 54–84) when using parental report of rotavirus immunization and 79% (95% CI 62–88) when using the registry.ConclusionParental report of their child's immunization with a rotavirus vaccine demonstrated high sensitivity, although the specificity was relatively low. Vaccine effectiveness was similar regardless of method used to determine rotavirus immunization status. Parental report of vaccination status can be useful in vaccine effectiveness assessment.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the implementation of a National Immunization Program for rotavirus vaccination in a country with a low rotavirus gastroenteritis-related mortality: A South Korean study

Rotavirus is a leading cause of severe gastroenteritis among children younger than 5 years in South Korea. Two rotavirus vaccines (RVs), pentavalent human-bovine reassortant vaccine (Rotateq®; RV5) and attenuated human strain originated monovalent vaccine (Rotarix®; RV1), have been available for voluntary vaccination using out-of-pocket payment since 2007 and 2008, respectively. Yet, RVs are not included in the National Immunization Program (NIP), partly because of the low associated mortality rate. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of RVs to assist the evidence-based decision-making process for NIP implementation in South Korea. Using a transparent age-structured static cohort model, we simulated the experience of ten annual birth cohorts of South Korean children from 2018 to 2027. Model inputs included rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) incidence and mortality rates, RVGE treatment costs, vaccine coverage and timeliness, and vaccine effectiveness and price. The incremental costs of including RVs in the NIP compared to no vaccination were 59,662,738 USD and 152,444,379 USD for RV1 and RV5, respectively. The introduction of RV1 and RV5 can prevent 4799 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and 5068 DALYs. From the societal perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for adopting RV into the NIP versus no vaccination were 12,432 USD per DALY averted for RV1 and 30,081 USD per DALY averted for RV 5. The weighted average for the ICERs of the two vaccines computed using the market share of each vaccine in the current voluntary use as a weight, was 21,698 USD per DALY averted. The estimated ICER was below 1 × gross domestic product per capita (30,000 USD), which has been a commonly used willingness-to-pay threshold for health care technology assessment in South Korea, suggesting that introducing RVs into the NIP would be cost-effective.     

Long-term effectiveness of pentavalent and monovalent rotavirus vaccines against hospitalization in Taiwan children

BackgroundTwo rotavirus vaccines (RV1 and RV5) are available on the private market in Taiwan, not included in national immunization program. Scanty reports evaluated the rotavirus vaccine effectiveness (VE) in Asian countries.MethodsFrom February 2014-July 2017, we conducted a prospective case-control study in ten hospitals in Taiwan. Case-patients included children aged 8–59 months, and hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed rotavirus acute gastroenteritis (AGE). For each case patient, up to four controls, rotavirus-negative AGE or non-AGE illnesses, respectively, were matched by gender, age and enrolled date. Vaccination history was confirmed through vaccination card or hospital record. VE was calculated as (1 − odds ratio of vaccination) × 100%.ResultsTotally 4248 AGE patients and 2242 non-AGE controls were enrolled. A total of 330 case-patients with rotavirus AGE, 1226 rotavirus-negative AGE controls and 1122 non-AGE controls were included for analysis. Unvaccinated rate was 85.15% for rotavirus-positive cases, 42.9% for rotavirus-negative controls, and 34.31% for non-AGE controls. VE of two-dose RV1 was 84.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]:77.7%, 90.1%) for rotavirus-negative AGE and 88.9% (95% CI: 83.4%, 92.8%) for non-AGE controls, while VE of three-dose RV5 was 92.5% (95% CI: 85.1%, 96.7%) and 96.4% (95% CI: 91.9%, 98.6%), respectively. For respective vaccine, VEs were not significantly different in term of rotavirus genotypes. VEs of both vaccines declined <80% in children aged three years by combined controls.ConclusionsBoth vaccines provided excellent and sustained protection against rotavirus AGE hospitalization in children in Taiwan, but the effectiveness declined slightly in children aged three years.     

A case-control study of risk factors for intussusception among infants in eastern France after the introduction of the rotavirus vaccine

ObjectiveThe objective of the present study was to investigate the risk factors for intussusception (IS) among infants, including vaccination against rotavirus.MethodsCase-control study with systematic inclusion of all infants aged <1 year with suspected IS admitted to emergency departments in the eastern region of France between 1 April 2008 and 31 March 2012. All cases classed level 1 according to the Brighton classification were matched to 4 hospital controls. Two exposure windows were examined; exposure to the first dose of rotavirus vaccine in the 7 and in the 14 days prior to the occurrence of IS.ResultsA total of 115 cases were matched with 457 controls. The average vaccination coverage rate over the 4 years of study was 8.6%. Rotavirus vaccine was not found to be significantly associated with the occurrence of IS in the 7 days (odds ratio (OR) not calculated; p = 0.99) and in the 14 days after administration of one dose vaccine (OR 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14–12.82). Infant formula alone or combined with breastfeeding was associated with an excess risk of IS (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.10–6.79). A history of gastroenteritis within 2 weeks prior to hospitalisation was also associated with an increased risk (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.07–4.67).ConclusionOur study indicates that infant formula alone or combined with breastfeeding is a risk factor for IS. A small, non-significant increase in the risk of IS was observed after rotavirus vaccination, although the low vaccine coverage rate likely precluded detection of a significant increase in risk.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a liquid Pentavalent (DTwP-Hb-Hib) combination vaccine manufactured by Human Biologicals Institute in 6–8 weeks old healthy infants: A phase III,randomized, single blind,non-inferiority study

BackgroundA liquid Pentavalent (DTwP-Hb-Hib) combination vaccine, developed by Human Biologicals Institute, underwent a Phase III clinical study in India. In this randomized, single blind, non-inferiority study, the immunogenicity and safety of this Investigational vaccine was compared with Pentavac SD® vaccine in 6–8 weeks old healthy infants.MethodsA total of 405 healthy infants aged 6–8 weeks old were randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive three doses of either the Investigational liquid Pentavalent (DTwP-Hb-Hib) combination vaccine or Pentavac SD® vaccine at four to six weeks interval. Immunogenicity was compared by estimation of antibody titers before the first dose and 4–6 weeks after the third dose of vaccination. Safety of each vaccine was assessed and compared by collection of data on solicited and unsolicited adverse events throughout the study period.ResultsOut of a total of 405 enrolled subjects, 387 subjects completed the study. The seroconversion rates, seroprotection rates and geometric mean titres of the Investigational liquid Pentavalent (DTwP-Hb-Hib) combination vaccine group were found to be comparable and non-inferior to the Pentavac SD® vaccine group at 4–6 weeks after the third dose of vaccination. Pain, erythema and swelling at the site of injection were found to be the most common local adverse events whereas fever, irritability and unusual crying were found to be the most common systemic adverse events in both the vaccine groups. No vaccine related serious adverse event was reported. In this study, both the Investigational vaccine as well as the Comparator vaccine were found to be immunogenic and well tolerated.ConclusionAfter assessment of the results of the study it was concluded that the Investigational liquid Pentavalent (DTwP-Hb-Hib) combination vaccine developed by Human Biologicals Institute was immunogenic and safe when administered to infants aged 6–8 weeks and was non-inferior in immunogenicity and safety to Pentavac SD® vaccine.Clinical Trial Registry of India Identifier: CTRI/2016/01/006541.     

A phase 1, randomized,observer blind,antigen and adjuvant dosage finding clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an adjuvanted,trivalent subunit influenza vaccine in adults ≥ 65 years of age

ObjectiveTo assess the safety and immunogenicity of the MF59®-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV; Fluad®) compared with modified aTIV formulations.MethodsA total of 196 subjects ≥ 65 years were randomized to receive 7 different formulations of vaccine containing a range of adjuvant and antigen doses by single injection, or divided into two injections at a single time point. The primary study objective was to compare the serologic response of different formulations of aTIV containing increased amounts of adjuvant and antigen 21 days after vaccination. Subjects were followed for immunogenicity and safety for one year.ResultsThe highest immune response, as measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay, 3 weeks after vaccination was observed in subjects in Group 6 with GMT 382.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 237.5 to 615.0), 552.3 (364.8 to 836.1), and 54.1 (36.9 to 79.4) against A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B respectively. Rates of seroconversion were also generally highest in this treatment group: 75% (95% CI 55.1 to 89.3), 75% (55.1 to 89.3), and 42.9% (24.5 to 62.8), respectively, against A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B strains. The highest incidence of solicited adverse events (AEs) was reported by subjects who received both the highest dosage of antigen in combination with the highest dosage of adjuvant at the same site: 67.9% and 57.1% in Groups 4 and 6, respectively. The majority of solicited AEs were mild to moderate in severity. The number of unsolicited AEs was similar across the different dosages.ConclusionIn this phase I trial of adults ≥ 65 years of age who received increased adjuvant and antigen dosages relative to the licensed aTIV, increased dosage of MF59 resulted in increased immunogenicity against all 3 components of seasonal influenza vaccine. The increase in immunogenicity was accompanied by an increase in the incidence of local reactogenicity.     

Assessment of immunogenicity and safety across two manufacturing lots of a 3-antigen hepatitis B vaccine,Sci-B-Vac®, compared with Engerix-B® in healthy Asian adults: A phase 3 randomized clinical trial

BackgroundSci-B-Vac®, a 3-antigen hepatitis B vaccine (3A-HBV), contains all three recombinant hepatitis B virus (HBV) envelope proteins (S, pre-S1, and pre-S2). In 2005, 3A-HBV manufacturing transferred facilities (A to B), where it continues to be manufactured.MethodsThis phase 3, single-blind, randomized study, conducted at one site in Vietnam, compared efficacy and safety among two 3A-HBV lots, lot A and lot B, and a single-antigen hepatitis B vaccine (1A-HBV), Engerix-B®. Primary objective was to demonstrate equivalence at day 210 of two 3A-HBV lots in seroprotection rate (SPR; defined as percentage of participants achieving hepatitis B surface antigen antibody [anti-HBs] titers ≥ 10 mIU/mL). Secondary objectives were assessing immunogenicity at days 180, 210, and 360, and safety of 3A-HBV.Results3A-HBV SPR equivalence was demonstrated at day 210 (lot A: 97.3% [95% CI: 92.4%, 99.4%] vs. lot B: 100.0% [97.0%, 100.0%]). Compared to 1A-HBV, lot B SPR was higher at day 180 (98.3% vs. 81.2%; difference: 17.1% [9.7%, 24.6%]) and non-inferior at day 210 (100% vs. 98.3%; difference: 1.7% [-0.6%, 4.1%]). 3A-HBV lot B showed the same SPR after 2 doses (98.3%) as 1A-HBV after 3 doses (98.3%). Adverse events (AEs) were comparable with both 3A-HBV lots (lot A: 68.7% vs. lot B: 54.2%), but higher than 1A-HBV (35.3%). Vaccination-related AEs included transient injection site pain (38.9%), myalgia (9.3%), and fatigue (7.5%). Eight serious AEs were reported (lot A: 3/134 [2.2%]; lot B: 1/134 [0.8%]; 1A-HBV: 4/133 [2.3%]). One serious AE, syncope, was noted as probably related to study vaccine, lot B.ConclusionsThe two 3A-HBV lots had equivalent immunogenicity, but lot B elicited faster onset of seroprotection and higher anti-HBs titers than both lot A and 1A-HBV in an Asian population. This supports 3A-HBV lot B as an effective choice for HBV vaccination, with a favorable safety profile.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04531098.     

Timeliness and factors associated with rotavirus vaccine uptake among Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children: A record linkage cohort study

ObjectivesRotavirus vaccines (RV), included in Australia’s National Immunisation Program from mid-July 2007, are unique in strict time limits for administration. Here, we report on timeliness of RV uptake, compare cumulative RV coverage to age 12 months with DTPa, and assess factors associated with receipt of RV among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children.MethodsBirth records for 681,456 children born in two Australian states in 2007–2012 were probabilistically linked to national immunisation records. We assessed on-time coverage (defined as receipt of vaccine dose between 4 days prior to scheduled date and the recommended upper limit) for RV and compared this to diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTPa) vaccine. Logistic regression modelling was used to assess independent determinants of receipt of RV.ResultsCompared to non-Aboriginal infants, on-time RV coverage was lower for all doses among Aboriginal infants. Post the upper age limit of RV dose2, DTPa dose2 coverage increased by 9–16% to ≥90%, whereas RV coverage remained around 77% (Aboriginal) and 85% (non-Aboriginal). Compared to first-born children, the adjusted odds of receiving ≥1 RV dose if born to a mother with ≥3 previous births was 0.30 (95%CI: 0.27–0.34) among Aboriginal, and 0.53 (95%CI: 0.51–0.55) among non-Aboriginal children. Prematurity (<33 weeks), low birthweight (<1500 g), maternal age <20 years, maternal smoking during pregnancy and living in a disadvantaged area were independently associated with decreased vaccine uptake.ConclusionsAboriginal children are at greater risk of rotavirus disease than non-Aboriginal children and delayed vaccine receipt is substantially higher. Although specific programs targeting groups at risk of delayed vaccination might improve RV coverage, relaxation of upper age restrictions is most readily implementable, and its overall risk-benefit should be evaluated.     

Assessing the impact of the routine childhood hepatitis B immunization program and the need for hepatitis B vaccine birth dose in Sierra Leone, 2018

Sierra Leone is highly endemic for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and thus recommends three doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB3) from 6 weeks of age but does not recommend a birth dose (HepB-BD) to prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). We evaluated impact of the existing HepB3 schedule and risk for MTCT of HBV. We conducted a community-based serosurvey among 4–30-month-olds, their mothers, and 5–9-year-olds in three districts in Sierra Leone. Participants had an HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) rapid test; all HBsAg-positive and one HBsAg-negative mother per cluster were tested for HBV markers. We collected children’s HepB3 vaccination history. Among 1889 children aged 4–30 months, HepB3 coverage was 85% and 20 (1·3% [95% CI 0·8–2·0]) were HBsAg-positive, of whom 70% had received HepB3. Among 2025 children aged 5–9 years, HepB3 coverage was 77% and 32 (1·6% [1·1–2·3]) were HBsAg-positive, of whom 56% had received HepB3. Of 1776 mothers, 169 (9·8% [8·1–11·7]) were HBsAg-positive. HBsAg prevalence was 5·9% among children of HBsAg-positive mothers compared to 0·7% among children of HBsAg-negative mothers (adjusted OR = 10·6 [2·8–40·8]). HBsAg positivity in children was associated with maternal HBsAg (p = 0·026), HBV e antigen (p < 0·001), and HBV DNA levels ≥ 200 000 IU/mL (p < 0·001). HBsAg prevalence was lower among children than mothers, for whom HepB was not available, suggesting routine infant HepB vaccination has lowered HBV burden. Since HBsAg positivity in children was strongly associated with maternal HBV infection and most of the HBsAg-positive children in the survey received HepB3, HepB-BD may prevent MTCT and chronic HBV infection.     

Distribution of rotavirus genotypes in Dhaka,Bangladesh, 2012–2016: Re-emergence of G3P[8] after over a decade of interval

Group A rotavirus causes a substantial proportion of diarrhoea related deaths worldwide among children under five years. We analyzed rotavirus prevalence and genotypes distribution among patients admitted with diarrhoea at icddr,b hospital in Dhaka during 2012–16. Stool specimens (n = 1110) were collected from diarrhoea patients and tested for RVA antigen using enzyme immunoassay. Rotavirus positive samples were G (VP7) and P (VP4) genotyped by RT-PCR and sanger sequencing. Data on clinical manifestations were collected from icddr,b hospital surveillance system. A total of 351 (32%) patients were positive for rotavirus antigen, about half of those were children under two years old. During the study period, G1P[8] (27%) was the most prevalent strain, followed by G12P[8] (15%) and G9[P4] (9%). Mixed G or P genotypes were identified in a substantial proportion (23%) with few strains of rare combinations such as G1P[4], G1P[6], G2P[6], G2P[8], G9P[6]. The genotypic fluctuation was noteworthy; G12P[8] was the major strain in 2012–14 but sharply decreased in 2015–16 when G1P[8] became the most common strain. G3P[8] re-emerged (17%) in 2016 after 11 years. Since the Government of Bangladesh has planned to include rotavirus vaccine in national immunization programme from 2018, our data will provide baseline information on rotavirus genotypes in the pre-vaccination era to observe the selection pressure on genotypes in the post vaccination epoch.     

Systematic literature review of cross-protective effect of HPV vaccines based on data from randomized clinical trials and real-world evidence

BackgroundThe extent of cross-protection provided by currently licensed bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines versus direct protection against HPV 31-, 33-, 45-, 52-, and 58-related disease is debated. A systematic literature review was conducted to establish the duration and magnitude of cross-protection in interventional and observational studies.MethodsPubMed and Embase databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies published between 2008 and 2019 reporting on efficacy and effectiveness of HPV vaccines in women against non-vaccine types 31, 33, 45, 52, 58, and 6 and 11 (non-bivalent types). Key outcomes of interest were vaccine efficacy against 6- and 12-month persistent infection or genital lesions, and type-specific genital HPV prevalence or incidence. RCT data were analyzed for the according-to-protocol (bivalent vaccine) or negative-for-14-HPV-types (quadrivalent vaccine) efficacy cohorts.ResultsData from 23 RCTs and 33 observational studies evaluating cross-protection were extracted. RCTs assessed cross-protection in post-hoc analyses of small size subgroups. Among fully vaccinated, baseline HPV-naïve women, the bivalent vaccine showed statistically significant cross-protective efficacy, although with wide confidence intervals, against 6-month and 12-month persistent cervical infections and CIN2+ only consistently for HPV 31 and 45, with the highest effect observed for HPV 31 (range 64.6% [95% CI: 27.6 to 83.9] to 79.1% [97.7% CI: 27.6 to 95.9] for 6-month persistent infection; maximal follow-up 4.7 years). No cross-protection was shown in extended follow-up. The quadrivalent vaccine efficacy reached statistical significance for HPV 31 (46.2% [15.3–66.4]; follow-up: 3.6 years). Similarly, observational studies found consistently significant effectiveness only against HPV 31 and 45 with both vaccines.ConclusionsRCTs and observational studies show that cross-protection is inconsistent across non-vaccine HPV types and is largely driven by HPV 31 and 45. Furthermore, existing data suggest that it wanes over time; its long-term durability has not been established.     

Identifying signatures of the impact of rotavirus vaccines on hospitalizations using sentinel surveillance data from Latin American countries

BackgroundPassive surveillance data are often the only available source of data that can be used to evaluate the population-level impact of vaccination, but such data often suffer from important limitations such as changes in surveillance efforts. This study provides an example of how to identify important signatures of rotavirus vaccine impact, including evaluating the overall effectiveness and changes in rotavirus seasonal dynamics.MethodsWe used data from a standardized sentinel rotavirus surveillance network in six Latin American countries (Bolivia, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Paraguay, and Venezuela) from 2004 to 2017. A random-effects model was used to evaluate changes in the proportion of rotavirus-associated hospitalizations following vaccine introduction. Harmonic regression models were used to estimate vaccine impact on the number of rotavirus hospitalizations, controlling for trends in rotavirus-negative cases. Changes to rotavirus seasonality were evaluated using center of gravity analysis, wavelet analysis, and harmonic regression.ResultsAll countries observed declines in the proportion of rotavirus-positive acute diarrhea samples with a mean reduction of 16% (95% confidence interval: 10–22%). We estimate that each 10% increase in vaccine coverage was associated with declines in the number of rotavirus-positive cases, ranging from 4.3% (1.3–7.2%) in Honduras to 21.4% (16.8–25.9%) in Venezuela. The strength of the seasonal peak in rotavirus incidence became smaller after vaccine introduction in Guatemala, Honduras, and Venezuela. Seasonal peaks also shifted later in the surveillance year, especially in higher-mortality countries.ConclusionsThe combination of methods we applied have different strengths that allow us to identify common signatures of rotavirus vaccine impact.     

Impact of rotavirus vaccine introduction and genotypic characteristics of rotavirus strains in children less than 5 years of age with gastroenteritis in Ethiopia: 2011–2016

IntroductionA monovalent rotavirus vaccine was introduced in the Ethiopian Expanded Program on Immunization from November 2013. We compared impact of rotavirus vaccine introduction on rotavirus associated acute diarrhea hospitalizations and genotypic characteristics of rotavirus strains pre-and post-vaccine introduction.MethodsSentinel surveillance for diarrhea among children <5 years of age was conducted at 3 hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 2011 to 2017. Stool specimens were collected from enrolled children and tested using an antigen capture enzyme immunoassay. Rotavirus positive samples (156 from pre- and 141 from post-vaccination periods) were further characterized by rotavirus genotyping methods to identify the predominant G and P types circulating during the surveillance era.ResultsA total of 788 children were enrolled during the pre- (July 2011-June 2013) and 815 children during the post-vaccination (July 2014-June 2017) periods. The proportion of diarrhea hospitalizations due to rotavirus among children <5 years of age declined by 17% from 24% (188/788) in the pre-vaccine period and to 20% (161/185) in post-vaccine introduction era. Similarly, a reduction of 18% in proportion of diarrhea hospitalizations due to rotavirus in children <12 months of age in the post (27%) vs pre-vaccine (33%) periods was observed. Seasonal peaks of rotavirus declined following rotavirus vaccine introduction. The most prevalent circulating strains were G12P[8] in 2011 (36%) and in 2012 (27%), G2P[4] (35%) in 2013, G9P[8] (19%) in 2014, G3P[6] and G2P[4] (19% each) in 2015, and G3P[8] (29%) in 2016.DiscussionFollowing rotavirus vaccine introduction in Ethiopia, a reduction in rotavirus associated hospitalizations was seen in all age groups with the greatest burden in children <12 months of age. A wide variety of rotavirus strains circulated in the pre- and post-vaccine introduction periods.