Effectiveness of Symptom Management Intervention for Improving the QOL of Cancer Patients

Background: Managing the symptoms of cancer patients is challenging for health care providers and interventions individually designed are required to improve the quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients. Objective: to assess the efficacy of symptom management intervention on symptom reduction and the QOL of cancer patients. Methods: A Quasi-experimental study using pre and post-test design was conducted among 200 cancer patients selected by a convenient sampling technique from the selected cancer hospitals. The intervention group received symptom management intervention and the control group received routine clinical care. The data were collected from individuals who had been diagnosed with breast/head and neck cancer and were in the third or fourth stages of cancer, using symptom assessment and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) QOL tool. After the pre-test, symptom management intervention was provided, and a post-test was conducted at one month and three months after the intervention. Results: The mean age was 50.93 years among the participants. Fifty-two percent and 68% of them were in stage IV cancer in the intervention group and control group respectively. The mean QOL score of head and Neck cancers in the intervention group increased from 20.76 (1.82) to 97.03 (3.33) and the mean scores of QOL of breast cancer patients in the intervention group increased from 22.44 (2.92) to 94.39 (8.30). Repeated measure ANOVA showed that the intervention program was effective in enhancing symptom reduction and QOL among cancer patients (Head and Neck cancers F(1.3, 114) =391.62, p< 0.001 and Breast cancer F (1, 75) =177.41.41, p=.001). Conclusion: Nurses play a vital role in providing care to cancer patients and improving their quality of life since nurses are more involved in care.     

Quality of Life of Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients in a Developing Nation

Background: Quality of life (QOL) of family caregivers of cancer patients is usually affected due to increase in caregiver burden. Their QOL has not garnered much attention by many including the health professionals and community. This study aims to explore the QOL of family caregivers of cancer patients in a multi-ethnic country in Asia and to investigate its associate factors. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study where family caregivers and patients who were diagnosed of cancers within 12 months were recruited. QOL of caregivers were measured using The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC). Psychological distress was measured using Hospital anxiety and depressive scale. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the related factors of QOL of caregivers. Results: A total of 458 patients/caregiver pairs were included. Symptoms of anxiety and depression reported by caregivers were 24.9% and 24.2% respectively. Caregivers of patients with solid tumors have better CQOLC score compared to those who cared for patients with hematological cancers (91.25 vs 86.75). Caregivers of non-Malay ethnicity, those caring for patients with advanced stage cancer and with hematological cancers had significantly poorer QOL. QOL of caregivers are also significantly affected when patients demonstrated anxiety symptoms. Conclusion: This study provides detailed evaluation of the QOL of caregivers of cancer patients in Malaysia. The significant psychological distress and low caregiver QOL indicate the urgent need for comprehensive supports for caregivers with cancer patients, especially those caring for patients with haematological cancers.     

Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Family caregivers for cancer patients experience high levels of stress and burden and diminished quality of life (QOL). Interventions to improve coping skills of caregivers have been shown to be effective with other populations, but their impact has not been assessed in the difficult context of hospice care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospice plus a coping skill training intervention improved family caregivers' QOL, burden, coping, and mastery, compared with hospice plus emotional support, and usual hospice care. METHODS: A three group randomized controlled trial was conducted including baseline, 16 day, and 30 day assessments conducted from March 1999 to May 2003. The sample consisted of 354 family caregivers of community dwelling hospice patients with advanced cancer. Patient/caregiver dyads were randomly divided into three groups, including a control group (n = 109) who received standard hospice care, a group (n = 109) who received standard hospice care plus three supportive visits, and a group (n = 111) who received standard care plus three visits to teach a coping skills intervention. Primary outcomes included caregiver QOL, caregiver burden due to patient symptoms, caregiver burden due to tasks, and caregiver mastery. RESULTS: At the 30-day follow-up, the coping skills intervention led to significantly greater improvement in caregiver QOL (estimate = -0.16, standard error [SE] = 0.07, P = 0.03), burden of patient symptoms (estimate = 0.28, SE = 0.07, P < 0.001), and caregiving task burden (estimate = -0.01, SE = 0.01, P = 0.038) than did the other two conditions. None of the groups showed significant change in overall caregiving mastery, caregiver mastery specific to caregiving tasks, problem-focused or emotion-focused coping. CONCLUSIONS: The coping skills intervention was effective in improving caregiver QOL, reducing burden related to patients' symptoms, and caregiving tasks compared with hospice care alone or hospice plus emotional support. Structured caregiver skill-training interventions for caregivers are promising even in the difficult environment of end-of-life care and for families already receiving benefits of hospice care.     

Use of family proxies in quality of life research for cancer patients at the end of life: a literature review

One of the main goals of end-of-life care is to achieve the best quality of life (QOL) for patients and their families. Quality of life, therefore, represents a significant outcome indicator to evaluate end-of-life care interventions. However, nonresponse bias and nonrandom missing data in QOL research at the end-of-life limits the generalizability and threatens the internal validity of the study findings. The use of family proxy of patients' QOL has been suggested as a solution. Demonstration of satisfactory levels of agreement between proxies and patients is warranted before family caregivers' or other proxies' assessments can be employed when patients cannot provide their own information. Contrary to the conclusion made by Sprangers and Aaronson [The Role of Health Care Providers and Significant Others in Evaluating the Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Disease: A Review. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1992, 45, 743-760], it is suggested from this review of literature that terminal cancer patients and their family caregivers agreed at least moderately well on the patients' QOL. The bias introduced by the use of family informants is generally of a modest magnitude. When discrepancies existed, without exception, family caregivers held a more negative view of patients' QOL than did patients. When using family proxies, this is important to remember. The degree of agreement between terminal cancer patients' and their family caregivers' assessments varies as a function of the dimensions of QOL being measured and the patient's health status. However, the accuracy of family caregivers' assessments can be improved by assessing both patients and family caregivers concurrently over time. Several suggestions for future research are provided to better understand the influencing factors of agreement between patients and family assessments and to enhance the quality of statistical analyses on this topic.     

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) of Gastrointestinal Cancer Caregivers: The Impact of Caregiving

Objective: This study examined the quality of life (QOL) of caregivers for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients, andassociated factors. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at three referral hospitals in Klang Valley, Malaysia.A total of 323 pairs of patients and caregivers from the oncology units of these hospitals completed questionnairesin Malay. The QOL of caregivers was measured using The Malay Caregiver Quality of Life questionnaire. Theindependent variables were caregiver and patient factors, care-related factors, the Caregiver Strain Index-Malay, andthe Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support-Malay. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses wereperformed to determine the factors associated with the QOL. Variables with p < 0.05 were considered significant in themultiple analyses. Results: Female caregivers were 68.1% of the total, and 46.4% caregivers were spouses to cancerpatients. Their mean age was 44.50 (13.29) years old. About 51.7% were of Malay ethnicity. The mean score for QOLwas 80.17 (21.58). Being a male caregiver (beta = 5.165, p = 0.011) and of Indian ethnicity (beta = -9.163, p = 0.001)were strongly associated with caregiver QOL. Male patients contributed higher QOL scores for the caregivers comparedto female patients. There was an inverse relationship among caregiving strain, duration of caregiving, and caregiverQOL. Conclusion: The identification of factors that affect QOL will allow healthcare providers to develop appropriateinterventions. It is important that caregivers be in good health so as not to compromise the care they provide to theirpatients.     

Influence of wellness education on first-line icotinib hydrochloride patients with stage IV non–small cell lung cancer and their family caregivers

Objective: This study aims to examine the effects of wellness education (WE) intervention on the behavioral change, psychological status, performance status on patients with stage IV non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing icotinib hydrochloride treatment and their relationships with family caregivers. Methods: We conducted an intervention study involving 126 individuals with confirmed activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive stage IV NSCLC who received icotinib hydrochloride as first-line therapy between January 2014 and January 2016; their caregivers were also included in the study. For a period of 12 weeks, participants were randomly assigned into WE and control groups. The patients and family members in the WE group were provided with WE information about treatment, diet, social needs, rehabilitation, physical/mental health education, communication strategies, and patient care advice at least 3 times per week during treatment. Qualitative feedback of the participants was recorded during the intervention. Food Composition Database, the Family Environment Scale, patients/caregivers quality-of-life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung/Caregiver Quality of Life Index–Cancer Scale), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were measured at baseline and for 12 weeks. Data were analyzed to compare the different outcomes. Results: Of the 126 caregivers (64 WE and 62 control), 120 completed the study. We observed significant differences between the WE group and control group with respect to low daily calorie intake (31.0% vs 77.4%, p < 0.05), smoking cessationaaa and awareness of cancer (85.48% vs 100%, p < 0.05). The WE group showed high ratings on awareness of cancer risk and benefit, as well as confidence relating to the behaviors of healthful diet and self-motivation to conduct cancer test. Family caregivers had high ratings on 30-minute daily moderate physical activity (p > 0.05). After 12 weeks, WE intervention had improved scores on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung-EWB and Caregiver Quality of Life Index–Cancer Scale adaptation. In addition, the patients also showed improvements in HADS. Conclusion: WE interventions in patients with stage IV NSCLC undergoing icotinib hydrochloride treatment and their family resulted in strong intentions to engage in health-promoting behaviors related to physical activity, smoking cessationaaa, and nutrition at the treatment period. WE intervention is a viable way to improve quality of life and HADS. Practice implications: Findings from this study suggest that WE interventions in patients’ family with stage IV NSCLC undergoing icotinib hydrochloride treatment are significant improvements in both HADS and quality of life. These data also indicate that lung cancer disparities are unlikely to be associated with differential willingness to receive care but that Chinese may perceive financial and insurance ebarriers to treatment.     

Quality of life of family caregivers at 2 years after a relative's cancer diagnosis

Purpose: Although a growing body of research has documented the quality of life (QOL) of cancer survivors beyond the initial phase of the survivorship, similar knowledge about family caregivers of cancer survivors remains limited. Thus, the current study aimed: (a) to characterize the multidimensional aspects of the QOL of family caregivers of cancer survivors at 2 years after the diagnosis and (b) to predict certain aspects of caregivers' QOL by their demographic and caregiving characteristics. Methods: A total of 1635 caregivers of cancer survivors participated in the nationwide Quality of Life Survey for Caregivers. Multidimensional aspects of QOL were assessed, including mental and physical health, as well as psychological adjustment and spirituality at 2 years post‐diagnosis of their relatives' cancer. Results: Family caregivers reported normal levels of QOL after 2 years post‐diagnosis, except that they were more likely to experience increased awareness of spirituality than do individuals who personally experience a chronic illness. In addition, caregivers' age and income and care‐recipients' poor mental and physical functioning were significant predictors of their QOL at 2 years post‐diagnosis. Conclusions: The findings suggest that younger, relatively poor caregivers who are providing care to relatives with poor mental and physical functioning may benefit from interventions to help in their spirituality and psychological and physical adjustment, 2 years after the initial cancer diagnosis. In addition, older, relatively poor caregivers may benefit from programs to reduce the physical burden of caregiving. These findings have implications for advancing public health research and practice. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Factors Associated with the Quality of Life among Family Caregivers of Cholangiocarcinoma Survivors in Northeastern Thailand

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a common and usually lethal liver cancer especially in Southeast Asia. Family caregivers (FCs) and their quality of life (QOL) is important for the care process to operate effectively. However, there are only few research articles about the QOL of CCA FCs. The goal of this study was to assess the QOL and its associated factors among CCA FCs. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study was undertaken with 231 CCA FCs who were the primary FCs for CCA patients in a tertiary hospital in Northeastern Thailand. The QOL was measured using the Thai version of the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life Questionnaire. Multivariate regression models were developed to investigate the predictors of the QOL, including the demographic characteristics, symptoms, anxiety and depression, and support care need. Results: The CCA caregivers had moderate to high QOL for all of four domains: the mean score was 27.03 (SD=2.81) for physical, 23.13 (SD=2.81) for psychological, 11.32 (SD=1.08) for social relationships, and 28.08 (SD=2.81) for environment. Multivariable analysis shows that, symptoms, support care need, age and education level were significant predictors of FCs’s QOL. Moreover. The QOL was lower in younger FCs (p<0.001). Conclusion: Symptoms, support care needs, age, and education level were associated with QOL among FCs for CCA patients. A holistic strategy that includes caregiver training, psychosocial therapies, and proper support may help these FCs for a better QOL.     

Randomized controlled trial of maintaining quality of life during radiotherapy for advanced cancer

BACKGROUND:

Psychosocial interventions often address only 1 domain of quality of life (QOL), are offered to patients with early‐stage cancer, do not include the caregiver, and are delivered after cancer treatment has been completed.

METHODS:

In the current randomized controlled trial, 131 patients with advanced cancer who received radiotherapy and their caregivers were randomly assigned to either a 6‐session, structured, multidisciplinary intervention arm or a standard care arm. The average age of the patients was 58 years, the majority were male (63%), and tumor types varied (gastrointestinal [37%], brain [22%], head and neck [16%], lung [13%], and other [12%]). The six 90‐minute sessions addressed the 5 domains of QOL: cognitive, physical, emotional, social, and spiritual. The in‐person intervention was followed by 10 brief telephone counseling sessions that took place over the next 6 months.

RESULTS:

Of the 117 patients who completed the study, overall QOL (assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐General [FACT‐G]) at week 4 was significantly higher in the intervention group (n = 54) compared with the standard arm control group (n = 63) (75.2 vs 68.7; P = .02). The 10 brief telephone contacts did not appear to impact QOL because at week 27 the groups had identical QOL (means of 77.6 and 77.7, respectively). There was no effect of the intervention noted on caregiver QOL.

CONCLUSIONS:

Participating in a 6‐session multidisciplinary intervention was found to be effective in maintaining the QOL of patients with advanced cancer who were actively receiving radiotherapy. The QOL and symptom burden of this population is striking, making it important to identify effective QOL strategies to implement in conjunction with cancer care. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Effectiveness of a Self-Monitoring Quality of Life Intervention For Patients with Cancer Receiving Palliative Care: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: Use of patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice has important benefits forpatients with cancer. To examine the effect of a self-monitoring quality of life (QOL) intervention on global QOL andphysical and emotional function in patients with cancer receiving palliative care. Methods: Prospective randomizedstudy had been undertaken at Toshima Hospital, Japan. This study compared an intervention group that completed theshortened Care Notebook booklet versus a control group that received usual care. The primary outcome was global QOLand secondary outcomes were physical and emotional function. Participants completed the European Organization forResearch and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative at baseline, and at 1 and 3 weeks.The effects of the intervention were evaluated with a linear mixed-effects model. Results: Forty-three patients wererandomized. One patient in each group could not receive the allocated intervention, leaving 41 patients for inclusionin the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis for the primary outcome. Twenty-seven patients were analyzed for thesecondary outcomes using per protocol set (PPS). The ITT analysis showed no significant overall effect on global QOL(P=0.285), but the PPS analysis showed a significant overall effect on global QOL (P=0.034) and physical function(P=0.047) for group difference over time in the linear mixed-effects model. Conclusions: Use of the Care Notebookmight have beneficial effects. The results could be interpreted as the effectiveness of the intervention of the CareNotebook for with cancer receiving palliative care.     

Factors associated with quality of life of outpatients with breast cancer and gynecologic cancers and their family caregivers: a controlled study

Background  

Quality of life (QOL) issues are of interest in cancer because effective methods of treatment and detection have led to an increase in the number of long-term survivors. The objectives of the study were: to assess the subjective QOL of stable Sudanese women cancer outpatients and their family caregivers, using the WHO 26-item QOL Instrument; compare with matched general population groups, as well as diabetic and psychiatric patient groups; examine patient-caregiver concordance in ratings; and assess the variables associated with their QOL, with a view to identifying factors that can enhance quality of care.     

晚期乳腺癌患者年龄和生存质量对其家庭照顾者生存质量的影响

目的：探讨晚期乳腺癌患者年龄及生存质量对其家庭照顾者的生存质量的影响。方法选取130例晚期乳腺癌患者及其130名家庭照顾者为研究对象,家庭照顾者完成照顾者生活质量指数-癌症表（CQOLC）问卷调查,所有的患者和家庭照顾者完成线性模拟自评量表（LASA）调查评估生活质量（QOL）,心境量表（POMS）评估心理状态。结果年龄≥65岁的晚期乳腺癌患者其照顾者心理健康、情感健康、精神健康、社会支持、总POMS分和总CQOLC分均高于年龄﹤65岁的患者照顾者,差异均具有统计学意义（P﹤0.05）。患者LASA中总的QOL评分﹥50分的晚期乳腺癌患者照顾者总QOL分、心理健康、身体健康、情感健康、精神健康、总POMS分和总CQOLC分均高于LASA中总的QOL评分≤50分的患者照顾者,差异均具有统计学意义（P﹤0.05）。结论晚期乳腺癌患者年龄≥65岁、生存质量高,其相应的家庭照顾者生存质量亦高。     

Assistance for improving QOL of patients using artificial respirator--a case of the very aged

The recent reform of the health insurance/Long-term Care Insurance resulted in the introduction of healthcare technology to home and patients can use even an artificial respirator in home medical care. However, both patients and family members have significant mental/physical burden, and in many cases, it may often be impossible to provide care to improve ADL/QOL. This time, a very old patient aged 88, who underwent artificial respiratory management, HOT, tracheotomy, tubal feeding, balloon catheterization and decubitus treatment among other medical cares, was discharged from the hospital and QOL was successfully improved by the care of family members and other various services. The success was mostly attributed to the endeavors of caregivers. In this article, we review the visiting nursing and assess what cares contributed to the improvement of QOL and discuss future assistance.     

Effects of a Self-Monitoring Quality of Life Intervention for Patients with Cancer Receiving Palliative Care in Japan: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Previous studies suggest the use of patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice hasimportant benefits for patients with cancer, particularly as feedback regarding patients’ quality of life (QOL) improvesdoctor-patient communication and clinical decision making. This study aimed to examine the effect of using the CareNotebook as a routine self-monitoring QOL intervention in clinical practice for patients with cancer receiving palliativecare. The results are expected to clarify the practical use of the Care Notebook in this population. Methods: Thisprospective randomized study is being undertaken at Toshima Hospital, Japan. Participating patients who are randomlyassigned to the intervention group will be asked to complete the shortened Care Notebook booklet for patients withcancer in palliative care once each day. A control group will receive usual care. The primary outcome is global healthstatus/QOL (Global QOL), as assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality ofLife Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative. Data will be collected at baseline (after allocation), and at 1 week and 3 weeksin both the control and intervention groups. The effects of the intervention will be evaluated with a mixed randomeffects model. The required sample size is 200 patients. We obtained approval from Toshima Hospital (No 26-11) andthe Tokyo Medical and Dental University Ethics Committee (No 1756). The findings will be disseminated throughpublications in peer-reviewed journals and attendance at domestic and international conferences. The trial was registeredwith the UMIN clinical trials registry (Trial registration number: UMIN000025322). Conclusions: This study willprovide evidence on whether medical staff can use the Care Notebook as a routine self-monitoring QOL intervention inclinical practice for patients with cancer receiving palliative care. We expect that a routine Care Notebook interventionfor patients with cancer will be recommended in healthcare facilities.     

Delirium prevention in terminal cancer: assessment of a multicomponent intervention

Objective: Delirium is a highly prevalent and deleterious disorder in terminally ill cancer patients. We assessed whether a multicomponent preventive intervention was effective in decreasing delirium incidence and severity among cancer patients receiving end‐of‐life care. Methods: A cohort of 1516 patients was followed from admission to death at seven Canadian palliative care centers. In two of these centers, routine care included a delirium preventive intervention targeting physicians (written notice on selective delirium risk factors and inquest on intended medication changes), patients, and their family (orientation to time and place, information about early delirium symptoms). Delirium frequency and severity were compared between patients at the intervention (N = 674) and usual‐care (N = 842) centers based on thrice‐daily symptom assessments with the Confusion Rating Scale. Results: The overall rate of adherence to the intervention was 89.7%. The incidence of delirium was 49.1% in the intervention group, compared with 43.9% in the usual‐care group (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, P = 0.045). When confounding variables were controlled for, no difference was observed between the intervention and the usual‐care groups in delirium incidence (OR 0.94, P = 0.66), delirium severity (1.83 vs 1.92; P = 0.07), total days in delirium (4.57 vs 3.57 days; P = 0.63), or duration of first delirium episode (2.9 vs 2.1 days; P = 0.96). Delirium‐free survival was similar in the two groups. Conclusion: A simple multicomponent preventive intervention was ineffective in reducing delirium incidence or severity among cancer patients receiving end‐of‐life care. Delirium prevention remains a difficult challenge in terminally ill cancer patients. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Toward population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care: testing stakeholder agreement

BACKGROUND: Quality indicators (QIs) are tools designed to measure and improve quality of care. The objective of this study was to assess stakeholder acceptability of QIs of end-of-life (EOL) care that potentially were measurable from population-based administrative health databases. METHODS: After a literature review, the authors identified 19 candidate QIs that potentially were measurable through administrative databases. A modified Delphi methodology, consisting of multidisciplinary panels of cancer care health professionals in Nova Scotia and Ontario, was used to assess agreement on acceptable QIs of EOL care (n = 21 professionals; 2 panels per province). Focus group methodology was used to assess acceptability among patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 16 patients; 2 groups per province) and bereaved family caregivers of women who had died of metastatic breast cancer (n = 8 caregivers; 1 group per province). All sessions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and audited, and thematic analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Through the Delphi panels, 10 QIs and 2 QI subsections were identified as acceptable indicators of quality EOL care, including those related to pain and symptom management, access to care, palliative care, and emergency room visits. When Delphi panelists did not agree, the principal reasons were patient preferences, variation in local resources, and benchmarking. In the focus groups, patients and family caregivers also highlighted the need to consider preferences and local resources when examining quality EOL care. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study should be considered when developing quality monitoring systems. QIs will be most useful when stakeholders perceive them as measuring quality care.     

Patient awareness of prognosis, patient-family caregiver congruence on the preferred place of death, and caregiving burden of families contribute to the quality of life for terminally ill cancer patients in Taiwan

Objectives: The main goal of end‐of‐life care is to achieve the best quality of life (QOL) for patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of (1) the patients' awareness of their prognosis, (2) the extent of patient–family caregiver congruence on the preferences for end‐of‐life care options, and (3) the perceived caregiving burden of family caregivers when they provide end‐of‐life care to their dying relative, on the QOL for terminally ill cancer patients in Taiwan. Methods: A total of 1108 dyads of patient–family caregiver from 24 hospitals throughout Taiwan were one‐time surveyed. Predictors of the QOL were identified by multiple regression analysis. Results: Controlling for the effects of age, financial status, and symptom distress, a novel finding of this study was that the patient awareness of prognosis, patient–family caregiver congruence on the preferred place of death, and the subjective family caregiving burden had a significant impact on the QOL of Taiwanese terminally ill cancer patients. Conclusions: QOL is not only related to the unavoidable decline in physical condition and daily functioning of the dying patient but is also related to domains that, as death approaches, have the potential to show improvement through the efforts of health‐care professionals, such as presenting prognostic information to optimize the patients' understanding and assists them with psychological adjustments, facilitating patient–family caregiver congruence on the end‐of‐life care decision regarding the place of death and lightening the caregiving burden of family caregivers. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Family resilience and psychological well‐being among Chinese breast cancer survivors and their caregivers

Walsh's family resilience theory indicated that families could foster resilient outcomes among their members when they are facing changes or crises. However, little is known about family resilience and psychological well‐being among Chinese breast cancer survivors and their caregivers. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the direct and indirect relationships between family resilience, breast cancer survivors' post‐traumatic growth (PTG), quality of life (QOL), and their principal caregivers' caregiver burden. A total of 108 breast cancer survivors/principal caregivers pairs completed a cross‐sectional questionnaire survey in a comprehensive cancer of a public hospital in Shandong Province, China. The structural equation modelling (SEM) results showed that family resilience had direct and indirect effects on QOL and caregiver burden, and it was positively related to the PTG of the survivors. The survivors' PTG was positively related to their QOL, and their QOL was negatively associated with caregiver burden. Therefore, a better understanding of how family resilience contributes to PTG and QOL of the survivors and caregiver burden could help clinicians tailor interventions to enhance interventions aimed at improving both survivors' and caregivers' well‐being.     

Reliability and Validity of Turkish Version of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index Cancer Scale

Background: Measuring effects of cancer on family caregivers is important to develop methods which canimprove their quality of life (QOL) . Nevertheless, up to now, only a few tools have been developed to be usedin this group. Among those, the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer Scale (CQOLC) has met minimumpsychometric criteria in different populations in spite of conflicting results. The present study was conducted toevaluate reliability and validity of CQOLC among Turkish cancer family caregivers. Materials and Methods:The CQOLC was administered to 120 caregivers, along with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), MedicalOutcomes Study MOS 36- Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), andMultidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Internal consistency and test-retest stability wereused to investigate reliability. Construct validity was examined by using known group method, convergent, anddivergent validity. For the known group method, we hypothesized that CQOLC scores would differ betweendepressed and non-depressed subjects. We investigated convergent validity by correlating scores for CQOLCwith scores for other similar measures including SF-36 and STAI. The MSPSS was completed at the same timeas CQOLC to provide divergent validity. Results: The values for internal consistency and test-retest correlationwere 0.88 and 0.96, respectively. The CQOLC discriminated those who were depressed from those who werenot. Convergent validity supported strong correlations between CQOLC scores and two main component scores(PCS, MCS) in SF-36 although there was a weak correlation between CQOLC and STAI scores. Regardingdivergent validity, the correlation between CQOLC and MSPSS was in the low range, as expected. Conclusions:The Turkish CQOLC is a reliable and valid tool and it can be utilized to determine QOL of family caregivers.