Change in COVID19 outbreak pattern following vaccination in long-term care facilities in Flanders,Belgium

IntroductionLong term care facilities for elderly (LTCFs) in Europe encountered a high disease burden at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, these facilities were the first to receive COVID-19 vaccines in many European countries. A limited COVID-19 vaccine supply early 2021 resulted in a majority of residents and healthcare workers (HCWs) in LTCFs being vaccinated compared to a minority in the general population. This study exploits this imbalance to assess the efficiency of COVID-19 vaccination in containing outbreaks in LTCFs.MethodsExploratory statistics were performed using data from a COVID-19 surveillance system covering all 842 LTCFs in Flanders (the northern region of Belgium). The number and size of COVID-19 outbreaks in LTCFs were compared (1) before and after introducing vaccines and (2) with the status of the pandemic in the general population. Based on individual data from 15 LTCFs, the infection rate and symptoms of vaccinated and unvaccinated residents and HCWs were compared during a COVID-19 outbreak.Results95.8% of the residents and 90.9% of the HCWs in Flemish LTCFs were vaccinated before May 30, 2021. Before vaccine introduction, residents in LTCFs were 10 times more likely to test positive for COVID-19 than the general population of Flanders. This ratio reversed after vaccination. Furthermore, after vaccination fewer and shorter outbreaks were observed involving fewer residents. During these outbreaks, vaccinated and unvaccinated residents were equally likely to test positive, but positive vaccinated residents were less likely to develop severe symptoms. In contrast, unvaccinated HCWs were more likely to test positive.ConclusionIn the first half of 2021, two-dose vaccination was highly efficient in preventing and containing outbreaks in LTCFs, reducing COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths. The high likelihood of unvaccinated HCWs to be involved in COVID-19 outbreaks in vaccinated LTCFs emphasizes the importance of vaccinating HCWs.     

Influenza vaccine coverage and predictors of vaccination among aged care workers in Sydney Australia

Aged care facilities (ACFs) are residential communities with a concentration of vulnerable individuals with increased risk of severe influenza infection and complications such as outbreaks, hospitalisations and deaths. Aged care workers (ACW) are potential sources of influenza introduction and transmission in ACFs. Little is known about vaccine uptake among ACW. This study aimed to measure the vaccine uptake rate among Australian ACW and evaluate the demographic determinants of uptake during the influenza season of 2018.146 ACWs were recruited from 7 facilities of a multisite aged care provider in Sydney. ACWs completed a questionnaire regarding their demographic, occupational and vaccination status. Vaccine coverage was calculated and variables were examined against their 2018 influenza vaccination status in statistical analysis.ACWs in our study were predominantly from a non-health occupational background with a large proportion of migrant workers (56%, 75/134). Vaccine coverage in 2018 was 48% (65/135). The strongest determinants of vaccine uptake were previous year vaccination history (Odds Ratio [OR] 10.49, 95% CI 3.33–33.10), workplace immunisation programs for employees (OR 7.87, 95% CI 2.47–25.10), casual work as employment status (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02–0.77), and presence of comorbidities (OR 4.04, 95% CI 1.23–13.32).ACW are a unique and understudied group who are critical to infection control in ACFs. Few ACWs have formal health training, and many are migrants who may lack access to subsidised health care and face out of pocket costs for vaccination. Vaccine coverage among ACW were below recommended levels. Provision of influenza vaccine for staff in workplaces is highly effective in raising vaccine coverage amongst ACWs. More research on the aged care sector workforce is needed in order to evaluate the determinants of vaccine uptake among Australian ACWs.     

Increasing influenza and pneumococcal vaccination and tuberculosis screening among residents of Colorado long-term care facilities

Persons residing in long-term care facilities are especially vulnerable to potentially preventable morbidity and mortality caused by influenza, S. pneumoniae, and tuberculosis. This project's objective was to increase the rates of pneumococcal vaccination, tuberculosis screening, and annual influenza vaccination. Intervention consisted of staff training videos, sample policies, and educational materials for residents and their families. At baseline during the 1995-1996 flu season, 84% of Colorado long-term care residents were vaccinated for influenza; 16% of residents had ever received pneumococcal vaccination; and 59% had been screened for tuberculosis. At remeasurement during 1997 to 1998, influenza vaccination rates were up to 89%, p = 0.006. The percentage of residents who had ever received pneumococcal vaccination increased to 48% at remeasurement, p < 0.001. Tuberculosis screening rates increased to 83%, p < 0.001. Following an educational intervention targeting both residents and staff, residents were significantly more likely to receive all three preventive services.     

Healthcare-associated infection among residents of long-term care facilities: a cohort and nested case-control study

Knowledge of infection control measures in nursing homes is limited. This study aimed to assess the incidence of, and potential risk factors for, healthcare-associated infection in long-term care facilities in Norway. Incidence of healthcare-associated infection was recorded prospectively in six long-term care facilities located in two major cities in Norway between 1 October 2004 and 31 March 2005. For each resident with an infection we aimed for two controls in a nested case-control study to identify potential risk factors. Incidence of infection was 5.2 per 1000 resident-days. Urinary and lower respiratory tract infections were the most common. Patients confined to their beds [odds ratio (OR=2.7)], who stayed <28 days (OR=1.5), had chronic heart disease (OR=1.3), urinary incontinence (OR=1.5), an indwelling urinary catheter (OR=2.0) or skin ulcers (OR=1.8) were shown to have a greater risk for infection. Age, sex and accommodated in a two- versus single-bed room were not significant factors. Incidence of infection in nursing homes in Norway is within the range reported from other countries. This study identified several important risk factors for healthcare-associated infection. There is a need to prevent infection by implementing infection control programmes including surveillance in long-term care facilities.     

Nudging influenza vaccination among health care workers

Our online randomized controlled trial on 6230 healthcare workers (HCWs) tests the impact that three nudges – social norms, reminding the impact on beneficiaries, and defaults – have on the intention to vaccinate against seasonal influenza across job families. Willingness to get a flu shot was higher among subjects invited to imagine themselves working at the local health authority (LHA) with the greatest immunization coverage within their region relative to their counterparts prompted to imagine working at the LHA with the lowest coverage. Reminding the impact of flu vaccination on beneficiaries had different effects across job families, with physicians caring more benefits for themselves, nurses about patients’ benefits, and technicians about family and friends. Default responses anchoring toward a high rather than a low vaccination intention increased the willingness to immunize among all HCW except physicians. Targeted nudges can be considered in developing interventions to promote influenza vaccination among HCWs.     

Cytomegalovirus infection and responsiveness to influenza vaccination in elderly residents of long-term care facilities

Ample evidence suggests that infection with cytomegalovirus (CMV) leads to accelerated aging of the immune system and may contribute to poor responsiveness to influenza vaccination in older persons. The objective of this study was to investigate whether CMV infection, acquired earlier in life, affects the response to influenza vaccination in a randomized controlled trial among older persons in long-term care facilities. During the 1997-1998 influenza season, 731 residents (median age 83 [interquartile range 78-88], 75.4% female) in 14 long-term care facilities in the Netherlands were randomly assigned to receive 15 or 30 μg of inactivated influenza vaccine, followed by a 15 μg booster vaccine or a placebo vaccine at day 84. Blood samples were collected at day 0, day 25, day 84 and day 109. Seroresponses to influenza vaccination were measured by hemagglutination-inhibition tests to the A/H3N2 strain at all time points. Subsequently, baseline levels of IgG anti-CMV antibodies were measured using an automated chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. Participants with CMV antibody level≥6 AU/mL were considered to harbor CMV infection. At baseline, no differences in pre-vaccination geometric mean antibody titers (GMT) were observed between participants with (n=571, 78.1%) or without CMV infection (n=160, 21.9%). During follow-up, participants with and without CMV infection had similar responses to influenza vaccination as measured with changes in GMT (linear mixed model, adjusted for gender, age, pre-vaccination GMT and vaccination strategy, p=0.46). Analogously, no association was found between CMV infection and a more than 4-fold increase in antibody titer (Generalized Estimating Equations, adjusted OR 1.14 [95%CI 0.80;1.64]) or an antibody titer≥40 (adjusted OR 1.24 [95%CI 0.86;1.80]). In conclusion, CMV infection did not explain poor responsiveness to influenza vaccination in residents of long-term care facilities.     

Factors associated with repeated influenza vaccine uptake among aged care staff in an Australian sample from 2017 to 2019

Background/AimInfluenza vaccination is strongly recommended every year for aged care staff to protect themselves and minimise risk of transmission to residents. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with repeated annual influenza vaccine uptake among Australian aged care staff from 2017 to 2019.MethodsDemographic, medical and vaccination data collected from the staff, who participated in an observational study from nine aged care facilities under a single provider in Sydney Australia, were analysed retrospectively. Based on the pattern of repeated influenza vaccination from 2017 to 2019, three groups were identified: (1) unvaccinated all three years; (2) vaccinated occasionally(once or twice) over three years; and (3)vaccinated all three years. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to better understand the factors associated with the pattern of repeated influenza vaccination.ResultsFrom a total of 138 staff, between 2017 and 2019, 28.9 % (n = 40) never had a vaccination, while 44.2 % (n = 61) had vaccination occasionally and 26.8 % (n = 37) had vaccination all three years. In the multinomial logistic regression model, those who were<40 years old (OR = 0.57, 95 % CI: 0.19–0.90, p < 0.05) and those who were current smokers (OR = 0.20; 95 % CI: 0.03–0.76, p < 0.05) were less likely to have repeated vaccination for all three years compared to the unvaccinated group. Those who were<40 years old (OR = 0.61; 95 % CI: 0.22–0.68, p < 0.05) and those who were born overseas (OR = 0.50; 95 % CI:0.27–0.69, p < 0.05) were more likely to be vaccinated occasionally compared to the unvaccinated group.ConclusionThe significant predictors of repeated vaccine uptake across the three-year study period among aged care staff were age, smoking status and country of birth (Other vs Australia). Targeted interventions towards the younger age group (<40 years old), smokers and those who were born overseas could improve repeated influenza vaccination uptake in the aged care workforce.     

Changing the default to promote influenza vaccination among health care workers

BackgroundThe prevention of health care acquired infections is an important objective for patient safety and infection control in all health care settings. Influenza vaccination uptake among health care workers (HCWs) is the most effective method to prevent transmission to patients, but vaccination coverage rates are low among HCWs. Several educational campaigns have been developed to increase the influenza vaccination coverage rates of HCWs, but showed only small effects. The aim of this study was to test an opt-out strategy in promoting uptake among HCWs in a tertiary care center for patients with complex chronic organ failure.MethodsHCWs were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In the opt-out condition (N = 61), participants received an e-mail with a pre-scheduled appointment for influenza vaccination, which could be changed or canceled. In the opt-in condition (N = 61), participants received an e-mail explaining that they had to schedule an appointment if they wanted to get vaccinated.ResultsThe findings show no statistically detectable effect of condition on being vaccinated against influenza. However, HCWs in the opt-out condition were more likely to have an appointment for influenza vaccination, which in turn increased the probability of getting vaccinated.ConclusionTo change the default to promote influenza vaccination among HCWs might be an easy and cost-effective alternative to the complex vaccination campaigns that have been proposed in recent years.     

State law and influenza vaccination of health care personnel

Nosocomial influenza outbreaks, attributed to the unvaccinated health care workforce, have contributed to patient complications or death, worker illness and absenteeism, and increased economic costs to the health care system. Since 1981, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that all HCP receive an annual influenza vaccination.     

Improving communication among attending physicians, long-term care facilities, residents, and residents' families

Effective bidirectional communication between attending physicians and long-term care facilities is of critical importance to ensure timely, appropriate, and high-quality care that is responsive to residents' needs, values, and preferences. Ongoing communication with residents and residents' families is essential to the establishment of mutual trust and respect. This earned trust and respect in turn promotes frank discussions among long-term care practitioners and the facility staff who can then better guide residents and families through difficult care decisions.     

The views of key stakeholders around mandatory influenza vaccination of hospital and aged care staff: Examining the current climate in Australia

Background

Healthcare worker (HCW) vaccination against seasonal influenza is considered a key preventative measure within hospitals and aged-care facilities (ACFs) to reduce the risk of transmission and related disease. Despite this, many facilities experience persistently low vaccination coverage rates and mandatory vaccination has been explored as a potential strategy to improve coverage. This study explored the current climate around staff vaccination in Australia from the perspective of opinion leaders and key stakeholders.

Prevalence of nosocomial infections and use of antibiotics in long-term care facilities in Norway, 2002 and 2003

There were 42900 institution-beds in long-term care facilities for elderly persons in Norway in 2000. This is twice as many as in 1984. Of those living in an elderly people's care institution 77% were above 80 years. To determine the magnitude and distribution of nosocomial infections in such institutions, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health initiated a surveillance system. The system is based on two annual one-day prevalence surveys recording the four most common nosocomial infections: urinary tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections, surgical-site infections and skin infections, as well as antibiotic use. All long-term care facilities were invited to participate in the four surveys in 2002 and 2003. The total prevalence of the four recorded nosocomial infections varied between 6.6 and 7.3% in the four surveys. Nosocomial infections occurred most frequently in the urinary tract (50%), followed by infections of the skin (25%), of the lower respiratory tract (19%) and of surgical sites (5%). The prevalence of nosocomial infections was highest in rehabilitation and short-term wards, whereas the lowest prevalence was found in special units for persons with dementia. In all the surveys the prevalence of the four recorded nosocomial infections was higher than the prevalence of patients receiving antibiotics. The frequency of nosocomial infections in such facilities highlights the need for nosocomial infection surveillance in this population and a need to implement infection control measures, such as infection control programmes including surveillance of nosocomial infections.     

Factors affecting uptake of influenza vaccination among family physicians

AimThe aim of this study was to determine the factors that influenced the decisions of family physicians working in primary care health services to receive influenza vaccines.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was performed between June 2014 and September 2014. Physicians were reached electronically via e-mail. A self-reported questionnaire consisting of 50 items covering potential factors that may have influenced their decision to receive vaccination, including perceived risk, severity of the perceived risk, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, cues to action, attitudes, social influences and personal efficacy, was administered to the study participants. Cronbach's alpha for the questionnaire was determined to be 0.92 in the pilot study.ResultsThe response rate was 27.5% (n = 596). Regularly vaccinated physicians accounted for 27.3% of the responses. The median age was 41.84 ± 7.80, and the median working duration of the group was 17.0 ± 7.8 years. The factors that led to increased vaccination compliance (p < 0.05) included working duration, age, chronic disease history and living with a person over 65 years. Nearly all major domains, i.e., perceived risk, severity of the perceived risk, perceived benefit, perceived barriers, attitudes, social influences and personal efficacy, there were differences between the compliant and noncompliant groups. Multi-regression analyses revealed that risk perception, organizational factors such as time and convenient vaccination increased vaccine compliance. However, the perceived necessity to be vaccinated annually had a negative effect on vaccination behaviour (p < 0.05).ConclusionStrategies aimed to increase the flu vaccination ratio among physicians that do not take different factors into account are more likely to be unsuccessful. In the planning and implementation of strategies aiming to increase the vaccination ratio among physicians, it is both necessary and important to take into account behavioural and organizational factors.     

Which determinants should be targeted to increase influenza vaccination uptake among health care workers in nursing homes?

Although health care workers (HCWs) have been recommended to be immunized against influenza, vaccine uptake remains low. So far, research on determinants of influenza vaccination among HCWs has been limited by design, population or theoretical framework. Therefore we conducted a questionnaire study in Dutch nursing homes to assess which demographical, behavioural and organisational determinants were associated with influenza vaccine uptake among HCWs. We were able to accurately predict vaccine uptake based on a 13-item prediction model including two demographical, nine behavioural and two organisational determinants developed with data from 1,125 respondents (response rate 60%). To further increase influenza vaccine uptake, implementation programs should target these determinants.     

Moving the needle on nursing staff influenza vaccination in long-term care: Results of an evidence-based intervention

PurposeInfluenza vaccination rates among healthcare providers (HCPs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are commonly below the Healthy People 2020 goal of 90%. This study was conducted to develop and evaluate an intervention program designed to increase influenza uptake among HCPs in LTCFs.MethodsThis study was conducted in four Midwestern LTCFs. Baseline interviews, surveys, and administrative data analysis were performed following the 2013–2014 influenza season. Interventions implemented during the 2014–2015 season were based on the health belief and ecological models and included goal-setting worksheets, policy development, educational programs, kick-off events, incentives, a vaccination tracking roster, and facility-wide communication about vaccine uptake among HCPs. Outcomes were evaluated in 2015.ResultsAt baseline, 50% of 726 nursing staff employed during the 2013–2014 influenza season had documented receipt of influenza vaccine (Site A: 34%; Site B: 5%; Site C: 75%; Site D: 62%), and 31% of 347 survey respondents reported absenteeism due to respiratory illness. At follow-up, 85% of HCPs had documented receipt of influenza vaccine (p < 0.01) and 19% of 323 survey respondents reported absenteeism due to respiratory illness (p < 0.01). Vaccination rates among respondents’ family members increased from 31% at baseline to 44% post-intervention (p < 0.01). Reasons for declining vaccination did not change following exposure to educational programs, but HCPs were more likely to recommend vaccination to others after program implementation.ConclusionsVaccination rates among long-term care HCPs and their family members increased significantly and HCP absenteeism decreased after the implementation of multifaceted interventions based on an ecological model. The findings suggest that major increases in HCP vaccination can be achieved in LTCFs. More research is needed to evaluate the impact of increased HCP vaccination on the health and productivity of LTCF employees, their family members, and residents.     

The expected emotional benefits of influenza vaccination strongly affect pre-season intentions and subsequent vaccination among healthcare personnel

Background

The relative importance of different attitudes in predicting vaccination among healthcare personnel (HCP) is unclear. We hypothesized that HCP who feel at risk without vaccination or say they would regret not getting vaccinated would be more likely to get vaccinated than HCP who do not expect these emotional benefits.

Methods

A prospective cohort of 1544 HCP with direct patient care was enrolled from September 18 to December 18, 2010 at Scott &; White Healthcare in Texas and Kaiser Permanente Northwest in Oregon and Washington. An Internet-based questionnaire assessed pre-season intention to be vaccinated and included 12 questions on attitudes about vaccination: single-item measures of perceived susceptibility and vaccine effectiveness, 5 items that were summed to form a concerns about vaccine scale, and 5 items summed to form an emotional benefits of vaccination scale. Influenza vaccination status for the 2010–2011 season and for 5 prior seasons was confirmed by medical record extraction.

Results

There were significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated HCP on all attitude items; 72% of vaccinated HCP agreed that they “worry less about getting the flu” if vaccinated, compared to only 26% of the unvaccinated (odds ratio = 7.4, 95% confidence interval = 5.8–9.5). In a multivariate model, the emotional benefits scale was the strongest predictor of 2010–2011 seasonal influenza vaccination, after adjusting for other attitude measures, prior vaccination history, and pre-season intention to be vaccinated. The predictive value of the emotional benefits scale was strongest for HCP with low pre-season intention to be vaccinated, where HCP vaccine receipt was 15% versus 83% for those with low versus high scores on the emotional benefits scale.

Conclusions

The expected emotional benefits of vaccination strongly affect seasonal influenza vaccination among HCP, even after taking into account other attitudes, pre-season intentions, and prior vaccination history. These attitudes are promising targets for future vaccination campaigns.     

长期护理机构老年痴呆照顾者积极感受与虐待倾向的相关性分析

目的 探讨长期护理机构老年痴呆照顾者积极感受与虐待倾向的关系,为预防虐待的发生提供参考。方法 采用自编一般情况调查表、老年痴呆照顾者积极感受问卷、虐待老年人评估量表对307名长期护理机构老年痴呆照顾者进行调查。结果 长期护理机构老年痴呆照顾者虐待倾向检出率为49.8%;老年痴呆照顾者积极感受问卷得分（33.31±6.76）分;积极感受与虐待倾向呈负相关（ρ = - 0.137,P = 0.017）,独立影响水平总体变异的20.9%。结论 照顾者积极感受是老年痴呆照顾者虐待倾向的重要影响因素,加强对老年痴呆照顾者积极感受重视和干预,有助于预防老年痴呆照顾者虐待倾向的发生。     

老年护理医院病人长期护理服务模式的研究

我国老年护理实践起步晚,患者在老年护理医院需要接受何种护理服务,并没有明确的标准。本文分析了我国老年护理医院长期护理服务模式的发展现状和存在不足,提出老年护理医院应建立针对老年、慢性病、临终关怀患者的长期医疗护理服务模式,从转变传统护理服务观念,探索助理护士管理模式,合理配置护理人力资源,建立老年护理质量评价体系等方面着手,构建适合国情的老年护理医院长期护理服务模式的建议,对提高老年护理病人生活质量和促进护理事业发展具有现实意义。     

Attitudes and perceptions among the pediatric health care providers toward influenza vaccination in Qatar: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundInfluenza is a communicable but preventable viral illness. Despite safe and effective vaccine availability, compliance rates are globally low. Neither local data on percentage of vaccination nor reasons for poor compliance among pediatric health providers are available in Qatar.AimTo estimate the percentage of vaccinated health care providers at pediatrics department and know their perception and attitudes toward influenza vaccinations.MethodsCross-sectional survey, conducted on 300 pediatrics healthcare professionals from January through April 2013 at the main tertiary teaching hospital in Qatar, included details of demographics, frequency, perceptions and suggestive ways to improve the compliance.FindingFrom among 230 respondents, 90 physicians and 133 allied health care professionals participated in this survey. Our study showed that percentages of participants who received flu vaccination were 67.7% and those who did not receive vaccination were 32.3%. Allied HCPs (69%) are more likely to get the vaccine compared to the physicians (66%). flu vaccination was approximately 5 times likely to be higher in the age group more than 40 years (P = 0.002) compared to age less than or equals 40 years. Overall 70% healthcare providers were willing to recommend immunization to colleagues and patients compared to 30%, who were not willing. The reasons for noncompliance included fear of side effects, contracting the flu, vaccine safety and lack of awareness about the effectiveness. In order to promote immunization, participants believe that use of evidence-based statement, participating in an educational campaign, provides no cost/on site campaigns and leadership support is the most practical interventions.ConclusionsIn the present study, the vaccine coverage among pediatrics HCPs seems higher than previously reported rates. Despite their positive attitude toward influenza vaccination, low acceptance and misconceptions of seasonal influenza vaccination by pediatric HCPs may have a negative effect on the successful immunization delivery and children immunization rate. Our findings would be useful for designing and implementing educational programs targeted to improve vaccination coverage rates.