Propofol and halothane versus sevoflurane in paediatric day-case surgery: induction and recovery characteristics

Background. The aim of this study was to compare the inductionand recovery characteristics associated with propofol inductionand halothane maintenance with sevoflurane anaesthesia in paediatricday surgery. Methods. In total, 322 children were assigned randomly to i.v.propofol induction and halothane/nitrous oxide maintenance orsevoflurane/nitrous oxide alone. The patients’ age, sex,and type of surgery were recorded, as were the times requiredfor anaesthetic induction, maintenance, recovery and time todischarge home. Postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the incidenceof adverse events during induction and recovery were also noted. Results. No significant differences were detected in age, sex,type of surgery performed or intraoperative opioid administration.Excitatory movement was more common during induction with sevoflurane.The mean time required for induction with propofol was 3.1 mincompared with 5 min in the sevoflurane group (P<0.001). Therecovery time was shorter in the sevoflurane group comparedwith propofol/halothane (23.2 vs 26.4 min, P<0.002). Theincidence of delirium in recovery was greater in the sevofluranegroup (P<0.001). There was no difference between groups inthe time spent on the postoperative ward before discharge home.On the postoperative ward the incidence of both nausea and vomitingwas significantly higher in the sevoflurane group (P=0.034).Five children were admitted to hospital overnight, none foranaesthetic reasons. Conclusions. The increased incidence of adverse events duringinduction, postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperativedelirium in the sevoflurane group suggests that sevofluraneis not ideal as a sole agent for paediatric day case anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 461–6     

Haemodynamic responses to sevoflurane compared with halothane during inhalational induction in children

We studied the haemodynamic changes during induction of anaesthesia in 50 ASA I and II children (1–12 yrs) undergoing minor elective surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups to receive either halothane (n=25) or sevoflurane (n=25) in a mixture of O₂ and N₂O (40:60) for mask induction of anaesthesia. Induction of anaesthesia was performed with an overpressure technique by administering rapid increases of gas concentrations, in increments of 1% up to 7% for sevoflurane and of 0.5% up to 3% for halothane. Induction was smooth and rapid in both groups but characterized by increases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure up to 20% especially in the sevoflurane group (P<0.05); these increases in the latter group were significant compared with baseline and the halothane group (P<0.05). No serious complications were observed. The authors conclude that more children experienced heart rate and blood pressure increases during the early stage of inhalational induction with sevoflurane compared with halothane.     

Sevoflurane in paediatric anaesthesia: effects on respiration and circulation during induction and recovery

This study examined induction and recovery times and respiratory and cardiovascular changes during induction and recovery in paediatric patients undergoing anaesthesia under spontaneous respiration induced with sevoflurane (S group, n= 10) and halothane (H group, n= 9) at 2.4 MAC. FET/FI increased more rapidly, the incidence of breath holding and coughing was less and the recovery time was shorter in the S group compared with the H group. During induction with sevoflurane at 2.4 MAC, min vol/bodyweight decreased due to reduced tidal vol/bodyweight despite increased respiratory frequency, as with halothane at the same MAC. Slight decrease in blood pressure was observed during induction in the S group, while the circulatory depression was not observed during induction in the H group. These results suggest that sevoflurane is a suitable agent for induction under spontaneous respiration with higher concentrations in paediatric anaesthesia.     

Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane or halothane for day-case anaesthesia in children aged 1-3 years

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to compare the recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane for short day-case anaesthesia in a specifically limited age group of children 1-3 yr. METHODS: Eighty unpremedicated children undergoing day-case adenoidectomy were randomly assigned to receive inhalational induction with either sevoflurane 8% or halothane 5% and nitrous oxide in oxygen (70/30) via a face mask. Tracheal intubation was performed without a muscle relaxant. Anaesthesia was continued with the volatile anaesthetic, adjusted to maintain heart rate and blood pressure within +/-20% of initial values. Recovery was evaluated using a modified Aldrete score, a Pain/Discomfort scale and by measuring recovery end-points. A postoperative questionnaire was used to determine the well-being of the child at home until 24 h after discharge. RESULTS: Emergence and interaction occurred significantly earlier after sevoflurane than halothane but discharge times were similar. More children in the sevoflurane group achieved full Aldrete scores within the first 30 min after anaesthesia, although this group suffered more discomfort during the first 10 min. The amount of postoperative analgesic administered was higher and the first dose given earlier in the sevoflurane group. Postoperative vomiting was more common with halothane, but side-effects in the two groups were otherwise similar in the recovery room and at home. CONCLUSIONS: In children 1-3 yr, sevoflurane provided more rapid early recovery but not discharge after anaesthesia of <30-min duration. Apart from more vomiting with halothane and more discomfort during the first 10 min after awakening with sevoflurane, the quality of recovery was similar with the two anaesthestics.     

Sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or halothane-nitrous oxide for paediatric bronchoscopy and gastroscopy

We have studied 120 infants and children, in three age groups (3-11 months, 1-5 yr and 6-15 yr), to compare anaesthesia with sevoflurane or halothane for bronchoscopy or gastroscopy, or both. Premedication or i.v. anaesthetic agents were not used. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either 7% sevoflurane or 3% halothane in 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen for induction of anaesthesia. The same inspired mixture was continued during bronchoscopy while the concentration of the inhalation agent was reduced by 50% during gastroscopy. Induction times were shorter for infants than for children and shorter for sevoflurane than for halothane. Cardiac arrhythmias were significantly more frequent during halothane than during sevoflurane anaesthesia. Physiological and psychomotor recovery were more rapid after sevoflurane than after halothane. At 24-h follow-up, children who received sevoflurane had significantly less nausea and vomiting. We conclude that sevoflurane was superior to halothane for paediatric bronchoscopy and gastroscopy.      

Redistribution of halothane and sevoflurane under simulated conditions of acute airway obstruction

Forty patients having surgery requiring muscle paralysis and tracheal intubation were randomly allocated to receive either halothane (n = 20) or sevoflurane (n = 20). Following intravenous anaesthesia and tracheal intubation, inhalation induction of anaesthesia was simulated. After attaining an end-tidal anaesthetic concentration of 2 MAC for the respective agent, the airway was obstructed for 3 min. The end-tidal anaesthetic concentration was measured for the first three breaths following the period of airway obstruction. The decrease in alveolar concentration of sevoflurane following 3 min of airway obstruction was found to be significantly greater than that of halothane. We conclude that even if the airway obstructs completely during inhalational induction of general anaesthesia, awakening would be faster with sevoflurane than with halothane.     

Sevoflurane versus halothane: effect of oxycodone premedication on emergence behaviour in children

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies have provided conflicting conclusions about whether the frequency of emergence agitation is increased in children following sevoflurane anaesthesia. The purpose of the study was to determine a frequency and duration of agitation with halothane and sevoflurane anaesthesia and whether oxycodone premedication affected the incidence of emergence agitation in children. METHODS: We measured and compared halothane and sevoflurane recovery in 130 patients using a 5-point scale measuring emergence behaviour every 10 min during the first 60 min of recovery or until discharge. RESULTS: We used this 5-point scale to assess the presence or absence of emergence agitation and found a frequency of emergence agitation of more than 40% in children who received halothane and sevoflurane anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Oxycodone reduced the frequency of agitation in children who received halothane, but not in the children who received sevoflurane anaesthesia.     

Induction and emergence in infants less than 60 weeks post-conceptual age: comparison of thiopental, halothane, sevoflurane and desflurane

We have studied 40 infants with a post-conceptual age of less than 60 weeks undergoing general anaesthesia for herniotomy. Patients were anaesthetized with 1 MAC equivalent values for age and agent and allocated randomly to receive halothane, savoflurane or thiopental for induction, and halothane, sevoflurane or desflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia. At induction, both time to acceptance of a face mask and loss of eyelash reflex were recorded. Emergence times were noted by a blinded observer. Induction and emergence times were similar between the halothane and sevoflurane groups but were consistently shorter in the desflurane group compared with the halothane or sevoflurane groups. There were no problems at extubation or significant apnoea in any group. Induction of anaesthesia in this population was no quicker with sevoflurane than with halothane and the method used for induction did not influence recovery time. Maintenance of anaesthesia with desflurane resulted in a shorter recovery time in infants in whom anaesthesia was induced with halothane or thiopental. Desflurane maintenance may be particularly beneficial in the neonate.      

The correlation between bispectral index and airway reflexes with sevoflurane and halothane anaesthesia

Background: Unwanted airway reflexes such as laryngospasm are a frequent cause for concern in paediatric anaesthesia. They are more active during light anaesthesia. Bispectral index (BIS) is a recognized measure of anaesthetic effect. Ensuring adequate depth with the BIS may prevent these reflexes. This study investigates the relationship between BIS and a defined measure of airway reactivity. Methods: Sixty‐two children scheduled for direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy were enrolled in this prospective nonrandomized blinded study. They were induced and maintained with either sevoflurane or halothane. When depth of anaesthesia was judged deep enough on clinical grounds, the cords were sprayed with 2% lidocaine. Using an A2000 monitor, the BIS was recorded at the moment of spraying the cords. The anaesthetist was blinded to the BIS and noted whether or not spraying resulted in complete closure of the cords. Breath holding, desaturation and coughing were also recorded as secondary endpoints. Results: Using logistic regression there was a significant correlation between BIS and cord closure for halothane but not for sevoflurane (halothane Pseudo r² = 0.5, P = 0.003; sevoflurane Pseudo r² = 0.0004, P = 0.9). Although the study was not specifically designed to test for it, no difference was detected between agents in the incidence of cord closure (halothane 38%, sevoflurane 36%), or secondary endpoints (halothane 29%, sevoflurane 29%). Conclusions: The BIS may be useful to help prevent unwanted airway reflexes when using halothane but not with sevoflurane. The differing sites of anaesthetic action for sevoflurane and halothane may explain this result.     

The efficacy of clonidine for reducing perioperative haemodynamic changes and volatile anaesthetic requirements in children

Background: Oral clonidine given as a premedicant in adults has been shown to reduce intraoperative inhalation anaesthetic requirements and provide perioperative haemodynamic stability. We conducted the current study to ascertain whether or not these beneficial effects of clonidine can be reproduced in children. Methods: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial, 60 children (ASA I) aged 5–11 yr, received placebo (control), 2 μg kg^-1 clonidine, or 4 μg kg^-1 clonidine orally 105 min before induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia was induced with halothane, nitrous oxide in oxygen via mask and maintained with halothane and 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The halothane concentration was titrated to the concentration required to maintain haemodynamic stability (defined as 20% of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR)) for maintenance of anaesthesia. The end-tidal concentration of halothane was monitored throughout anaesthesia. On completion of surgery, nitrous oxide and halothane were discontinued. Following confirmation of recovery from anaesthesia and muscle relaxation, the endotracheal tube was removed. Results: Higher inspired concentrations of halothane (%) were required in the control and 2 μg kg^-1 clonidine-treated groups (mean SD: 1.1 ±0.2 and 1.0±0.2, respectively) than in the 4 μg kg^-1 clonidine-treated group (0.6±0.1) for haemodynamic stability (P<0.05). Clonidine, 4 μg kg^-1, significantly reuced the intraoperative lability (coefficient of variation) of systolic and diastolic BP and HR compared with the other two regimens. Conclusion: Oral clonidine premedication at a dose of 4 μg kg^-1 provided intraoperative haemodynamic stability and reduced anaesthetic requirements in children. However, we are unable to extrapolate these observations to younger children and infants.     

Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and halothane on the quality of anaesthesia and serum glutathione transferase alpha and fluoride in paediatric patients

We have compared sevoflurane and halothane anaesthesia in paediatricpatients with reference to induction and recovery. We also assessedhepato-cellular integrity by measurement of serum gluta-thionetransferase alpha (GSTA) concentration and sevoflurane metabolismby serum fluoride concentration. Fifty unpremedicated 5–12-yr-oldchildren were allocated randomly to induction of anaesthesiavia a face mask with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and sevoflurane(up to 7%) or halothane (up to 3.5%). Anaesthesia was maintainedfor 1.8 h at 1–1.2 MAC of the volatile agent. Childrenreceiving sevoflurane had significantly faster induction andrecovery variables than those receiving halothane. There wasa small postanaesthetic increase in GSTA in both groups, suggestingthat halothane and sevoflurane may disturb hepato-cellular integrity.Serum concentrations of fluoride were significantly greaterafter sevoflurane than after halothane anaesthesia. There wereno clinical signs or symptoms of hepatic or renal disturbance.Children tolerated sevoflurane better than halothane, whichmay have been because of the non-pungency of sevoflurane andthe rapid psycho-motor recovery after anaesthesia.     

Rapid inhalation induction in children: 8% sevoflurane compared with 5% halothane

Sevoflurane has a lower blood-gas solubility and a less pungent odour than halothane; this may allow more rapid induction of anaesthesia. In a randomized, blinded study, we compared the induction characteristics of maximum initial inspired concentration of 8% sevoflurane and 5% halothane using conventional vaporizers in children aged 3 months to 3 years. There was no statistically significant difference in induction times between the two groups: mean times to loss of consciousness were 1 min 12 s (SD 18 s, range 40 s-1 min 44 s) for sevoflurane and 1 min 16 s (SD 17 s, range 50 s-1 min 52 s) for halothane, although these times were shorter than in previous studies using a gradual increase in vapour concentration. A small number of complications were noted in both groups, although none interfered with induction of anaesthesia. Struggling scores were lower in the sevoflurane group than in the halothane group (chi-square for trends = 6.34, P < 0.02). A significant number (11 of 15) of parents of children in the sevoflurane group who had previous experience of halothane induction preferred sevoflurane (chi-square for trends = 4.03, P < 0.05). We conclude that with this technique, induction was rapid with both sevoflurane and halothane. Our assessment of patient struggling and parents' perceptions suggests that induction with sevoflurane was more pleasant than with halothane.      

Anaesthesia and the QT intervalEffects of isoflurane and halothane in unpremedicated children

The effects of isoflurane and halothane on the QT interval were investigated during induction of anaesthesia. Fifty-one unpremedicated, ASA grade 1 children were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with either isoflurane ( n  = 25) or halothane ( n  = 26) and was maintained to the end of the study with end-tidal concentrations of between 2.5% and 3%. Recordings of the electrocardiograph, heart rate and systolic arterial pressure were obtained at the following times: before induction of anaesthesia; 1 min and 3 min after stable end-tidal concentrations of anaesthetic agent had been reached; 1 min and 3 min following vecuronium administration; at the time of tracheal intubation and 1 min and 3 min later. Isoflurane significantly prolonged the QT interval (p < 0.001), in contrast to halothane which shortened it (p < 0.01). Heart rate remained largely unchanged during isoflurane anaesthesia but it decreased in the presence of halothane (p < 0.001). In both groups, systolic arterial pressure decreased significantly after induction of anaesthesia (p < 0.001) and remained so to the end of the study. In the isoflurane group, 12 children developed ECG repolarisation abnormalities and in one child an arrhythmia was noticed. In the halothane group, one child developed repolarisation changes while arrhythmias were observed in 10 children. There were no adverse sequelae. It is concluded that halothane may be a better anaesthetic agent than isoflurane for use in children with a prolonged QT interval.     

Effects of halothane and sevoflurane on QT dispersion in paediatric patients

BACKGROUND: The QT dispersion (QTd) of the ECG is an indirect measure of heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization which may contribute to complex ventricular arrhythmias. We compared the effects of halothane and sevoflurane on QTd, and heart-rate corrected QT dispersion (QTcd). METHODS: Fifty ASA physical status I patients, aged 5-15 years, undergoing general anaesthesia were studied. A control ECG recording was printed before induction of anaesthesia. In the halothane group, anaesthesia was induced with halothane 4% in 2 : 1 ratio of air : O2 mixture and in the sevoflurane group with sevoflurane 8% in 2 : 1 ratio of air : O2 mixture. The ECG was recorded 1 and 3 min after induction of anaesthesia, 1 and 3 min after the administration of vecuronium 0.08 m.kg(-1) intravenous and 1 and 3 min after the tracheal intubation. All ECGs were analysed by two cardiologists blinded to the anaesthetic. RESULTS: Although QTd increased in both groups following intubation, this difference was not statistically significant when compared with control values. Following intubation five patients in the halothane group had ventricular arrhythmias of short duration, whereas no arrhythmias were recorded in the sevoflurane group (P = 0.052). Following intubation, QTd (45 +/- 15 ms vs 40 +/- 14 ms) and QTcd (60 +/- 17 ms vs 55 +/- 16 ms) values in the halothane group were significantly greater than the sevoflurane group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Neither sevoflurane nor halothane caused a significant increase in QTd compared with control values before induction. Only QTd following intubation was significantly greater in the halothane group than the sevoflurane group.     

Hepatic Effects of Halothane,Isoflurane or Sevoflurane Anaesthesia in Dogs

The effects of halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane anaesthesia on hepatic function and hepatocellular damage were investigated in dogs, comparing the activity of hepatic enzymes and bilirubin concentration in serum. An experimental study was designed. Twenty‐one clinically normal mongrel dogs were divided into three groups and accordingly anaesthetized with halothane (n = 7), isoflurane (n = 7) and sevoflurane (n = 7). The dogs were 1–4 years old, and weighed between 13.5 and 27 kg (18.4 ± 3.9). Xylazine HCI (1–2 mg/kg) i.m. was used as pre‐anaesthetic medication. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg i.v. The trachea was intubated and anaesthesia maintained with halothane, isoflurane or sevoflurane in oxygen at concentrations of 1.35, 2 and 3%, respectively. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation (tidal volume, 15 ml/kg; respiration rate, 12–14/min) was started immediately after intubation and the anaesthesia lasted for 60 min. Venous blood samples were collected before pre‐medication, 24 and 48 h, and 7 and 14 days after anaesthesia. Serum level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma‐glutamyltransferase (GGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH GGT) activities and bilirubin concentration were measured. Serum AST, ALT and GGT activities increased after anaesthesia in all groups. In the halothane group, serum AST and ALT activities significantly increased all the time after anaesthesia compared with baseline activities. But in the isoflurane group AST and ALT activities increased only between 2 and 7 days, and in the sevoflurane group 7 days after anaesthesia. GGT activity was increased in the halothane group between 2 and 7 days, and in the isoflurane and sevoflurane groups 7 days after anaesthesia. All dogs recovered from anaesthesia without complications and none developed clinical signs of hepatic damage within 14 days. The results suggest that the use of halothane anaesthesia induces an elevation of serum activities of liver enzymes more frequently than isoflurane or sevoflurane from 2 to 14 days after anaesthesia in dogs. The effects of isoflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia on the liver in dogs is safer than halothane anaesthesia in dogs.     

Effect of sevoflurane/nitrous oxide versus propofol anaesthesia on somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the spinal cord during surgery to correct scoliosis

Background. Use of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential(SSEP) monitoring is helpful in spinal corrective surgery butmay be affected by anaesthetic drugs. An anaesthetic techniquethat has less effect on SSEP or allows faster recovery is anadvantage. We compared the effects on SSEP and the clinicalrecovery profiles of sevoflurane/nitrous oxide and propofolanaesthesia during surgery to correct scoliosis. Methods. Twenty adolescent patients were randomized into twogroups of 10. One group received sevoflurane–nitrous oxideanaesthesia and the other received propofol i.v. anaesthesia.An alfentanil infusion was used for analgesia in both groups. Results. Changes in anaesthetic concentration produced littleeffect on the latency of SSEP, but the effect on the variabilityof SSEP amplitude was significant (P<0.05). Sevoflurane produceda faster decrease in SSEP and a faster recovery than propofol(P<0.05). On emergence, patients who received sevofluranetended to have shorter recovery times to eye opening (mean 5.1vs 20.6 min, P=0.09) and toe movement (mean 7.9 vs 15.7 min,P=0.22). Those who had received sevoflurane were significantlymore lucid and cooperative in recovery. Conclusions. Sevoflurane produces a faster decrease and recoveryof SSEP amplitude as well as a better conscious state on emergencethan propofol. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 502–7     

Recovery Times and Evaluation of Clinical Hemodynamic Parameters of Sevoflurane,Isoflurane and Halothane Anaesthesia in Mongrel Dogs

In the present study the influence of three volatile agents (halothane, isoflurane and sevoflurane) in oxygen at two concentrations [1.5 and 2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)] on non‐invasive cardio‐respiratory parameters (heart and respiratory rates, non‐invasive blood pressures at 15, 30, 60 min and after extubation) and on the recovery times (appearance of the first eyelid reflex, emergence time) after clinical anaesthesia was studied. After premedication with fentanyl‐droperidol (5 μg/kg and 0.25 mg/kg, intramuscularly) and induction with propofol (5 mg/kg, intravenously) six dogs were randomly anaesthetized for 1 h for a standard neurologic stimulation test. A wide individual variation in respiration rate (induced by an initial hyperpnea) was observed in the 1.5 MAC protocols, without significant differences. Heart rate was significantly lower during 1.5 and 2 MAC halothane when compared to isoflurane and sevoflurane. An increase from 1.5 to 2 MAC induced significant decreases in diastolic (DAP) and mean arterial blood pressure in all groups without significant changes in the systolic arterial pressures. Only DAP in sevoflurane protocol was significantly different at 1.5 and 2 MAC compared to halothane. Time had no significant influences on the non‐invasive blood pressures in all protocols. Extubation induced a significant increase of all parameters in all protocols. The time for a first eyelid reflex was significantly longer after 2 MAC compared to the 1.5 MAC protocol. There was no significant difference between the three anaesthetic agents. Although emergence time was longest for halothane at both anaesthetic concentrations, no significant difference in emergence time was observed for the three volatile agents.     

Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane- or propofol-based anaesthesia for day-care surgery

Background: Sevoflurane has a low blood-gas partition coefficient resulting in a rapid recovery. Few studies have examined the maintenance and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane compared with propofol in a standardized outpatient population. Methods: The study was a multicentre study performed in 10 centres. One hundred and sixty-nine elective outpatients due for knee-arthroscopy received 100 mg diclofenac rectally as pain prophylaxis prior to induction of general anaesthesia with fentanyl 1.0–1.5 μg/kg+propofol 2.0–2.5 mg/kg iv. Anaesthesia was maintained with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen through a laryngeal mask and continuous administration of either: sevoflurane (group S) or propofol infusion (group P) in order to maintain stable haemodynamics. Data of postoperative function and side-effects were collected in a double-blind design, including a patient interview after 24 h. Results: The sevoflurane patients had a significantly faster emergence from anaesthesia, with response to commands at 6.9±0.4 min versus 8.2±0.4 min in the propofol group (P < 0.05, mean±SD). At 15 min after surgery, group S had a better score in the digit symbol substitution test and felt less confused in a visual analogue scale test compared with group P (P<0.05). Peroperative bradycardia, nausea and vomiting and late postoperative dizziness were more common in group S. In the sevoflurane group, 32% had nausea or vomiting in the 24 h observation period compared with 18% for propofol (P < 0.05). There was no difference between group S and group P in postoperative pain, eligibility for recovery room discharge (75±12 versus 70±11 min) or home-readiness (155±12 versus 143±11 min). Conclusion: Maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane results in a more rapid emergence, but a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting compared with propofol. The side-effects were minor in our study, and did not result in any difference in time to discharge from the recovery ward or the hospital.     

Comparison of induction and recovery between sevoflurane and halothane supplementation of anaesthesia in children undergoing outpatient dental extractions

We have compared sevoflurane and halothane in a double-blind controlled study for supplementation of nitrous oxide and oxygen anaesthesia in 80 children undergoing dental extraction as outpatients. Induction of anaesthesia was more rapid in those who received sevoflurane compared with those who received halothane (89 s compared with 127 s for loss of eyelash reflex). In both groups, mean duration of administration of anaesthesia was less than 4 min. Those who received sevoflurane were slower to awaken (167 s compared with 102 s), although discharge times from hospital were similar. The incidence of complications during induction and maintenance was low in both groups and return to normal appetite and activity occurred in the majority of children on the same day. More children who received halothane suffered nausea after leaving hospital. We conclude that sevoflurane is a suitable alternative to halothane, with more rapid induction of anaesthesia, but in these short procedures, awakening time was slower than after halothane.      

Quality of recovery in children: sevoflurane versus propofol

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane, with its low pungency and low blood and tissue solubility, is an attractive anaesthetic in paediatric outpatient surgery. Propofol-anaesthesia is recognised for its rapid and clear-headed emergence. This study was designed to compare emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia for tonsillectomy in children. METHODS: Children aged 3-10 years, undergoing elective tonsillectomy, were randomly assigned to receive propofol (n=25, induction with 3 mg x kg(-1), maintenance with 100-250 microg x kg(-1) min(-1)) or sevoflurane anaesthesia (n=25, induction 7 vol.%, maintenance 2-3 vol.%). Tracheal intubation was performed with alfentanil 20 microg x kg(-1) and atracurium 0.5 mg x kg(-1). Ventilation was controlled to maintain normocapnia and all patients received N2O/O2 (60:40 vol.%) for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. At the end of surgery infiltration of the operative sites with bupivacaine 2 mg x kg(-1) was provided for postoperative analgesia. Emergence, recovery, discharge times, and incidence of side effects were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Time to extubation (14 vs 15 min), time to response to simple verbal command (21 vs 21 min) and time to discharge from the recovery room (45 vs 50 min) were similar in the sevoflurane and propofol groups, respectively. There was a significantly greater incidence of postoperative agitation in the sevoflurane group (46%) compared with the propofol group (9%) (P=0.008). This did not, however, delay discharge from the recovery room. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was not significantly different (8% vs 0%; P=0.49). CONCLUSION: In children, recovery from anaesthesia with sevoflurane results in a higher incidence of agitation compared with propofol.