Bond strength of composite to dentin using self-etching adhesive systems.

PURPOSE: To determine the shear bond strength to dentin of five newer-generation self-etching adhesive systems. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Flat bonding sites were prepared on 100 extracted human molar teeth with 600-grit silicon carbide paper, which exposed the dentin. The systems tested were: Clearfil SE Bond; Optibond Solo Plus Self-Etch; Xeno CF III; Tyrian SPE; and Adper Prompt L-Pop. Following application of each adhesive system, bonded assemblies of Z-100 were prepared using a gelatin capsule matrix (n = 20). Ten specimens in each group were debonded after water storage for 24 hours at 37 degrees C, and 10 were stored for at least 30 days, followed by thermocycling for 850 cycles between water baths at 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, with a dwell time of 1 minute in each bath. Specimens were loaded to failure in an Instron Model 1123 testing machine with a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Statistical analysis included a two-way analysis of variance (adhesive and time) and Tukey's post hoc test. RESULTS: Mean shear bond strengths (MPa) at 24 hours were: Clearfil, 26.4+/-4.2; Optibond, 23.5+/-4.4; Xeno, 19.5+/-4.2; Tyrian, 16.5+/-3.7; and Adper, 15.3+/-3.3. Mean shear bond strengths (MPa) after storage and thermocycling were: Optibond, 27.5+/-5.7; Clearfil, 25.5+/-4.9; Adper, 21.5+/-3.3; Xeno, 20.4+/-2.2; and Tyrian, 19.2+/-6.4. Both adhesive system and storage time were significant factors affecting shear bond strength (P < .05). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in the in vitro dentin shear bond strength among the self-etching adhesive materials tested. Water storage and thermocycling did not significantly degrade the shear bond strength of the materials in this study.     

Tensile bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to primary dentin

PURPOSE: To assess in vitro the bond strength of three self-etching adhesive systems to primary teeth dentin. METHODS: Fifteen crowns of primary molars were sectioned mesiodistally and embedded in acrylic resin (n=30). Dentin was exposed and the specimens were randomly assigned in groups (n=10): (1) Clearfil SE Bond; (2) Prime & Bond NT/NRC; and (3) One Up Bond F. A 3 mm-diameter dentin bonding site was demarcated, the adhesive systems were applied and resin composite cones were bonded. After 24 hours in distilled water, tensile bond strength was tested to failure (0.5 mm/minute). Data were submitted to statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA and Scheffé test. RESULTS: Means were (MPa): (1) 16.60 (+/- 4.10); (2) 8.48 (+/- 4.51); and (3) 6.75 (+/- 1.26). CSE Bond yielded significantly higher bond strengths (P < 0.05). Prime & Bond NT/NRC and One Up Bond F means were markedly low and no statistically significant difference was observed between them.     

Micro-tensile bond strength of self-etching primer adhesive systems to human coronal carious dentin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-tensile bond strengths of three self-etching primer adhesive systems to normal dentin (ND), caries-affected dentin (CAD) and caries-infected dentin (CID). Human extracted molars with caries were used, and flat dentin surfaces ground by 600-grit SiC paper were prepared. The surfaces were dyed using Caries-Detector solution, treated with Clearfil SE Bond, Mac-Bond II and UniFil Bond, and then covered with resin composites according to manufacturer's instructions. After immersion in 37 degrees C water for 24 h, the teeth were serially sectioned into multiple slices. Each slice was distinguished into ND, CAD and CID groups by the degree of staining, and the bond strength was measured in a universal testing machine. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) observation was also performed. For statistical analysis, anova and Scheffe's test were used (P < 0.05). The bond strengths of the three adhesive systems to CAD and CID were significantly lower than those to ND. There was significant difference in the bond strength to ND between Clearfil SE Bond and UniFil Bond, but no significant differences to CAD and CID among the three adhesive systems. On SEM, the hybrid layers in CAD and CID showed more porous structures compared with ND. The results indicated that the bond strengths to CAD and CID were not affected by a variety of self-etching primer adhesive systems because of the porous hybrid layer formation in carious dentin.     

Bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system to caries-affected dentin

This in vitro study evaluated the microtensile bond strengths of sound versus caries-affected dentin using a self-etching adhesive system, Clearfil SE Bond, with or without additional acid pre-conditioning. Extracted human mandibular molars with occlusal caries extending halfway through the dentin were used. In the first group, the teeth were bonded with the self-etching adhesive Clearfil SE Bond according to the manufacturer's instructions. In the second group, prepared dentin surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid prior to applying the same self-etching adhesive. After the bonding procedure, all specimens were built up with composite resin and stored in water for 24 hours. The teeth were serially sectioned vertically into 0.7-mm slabs and trimmed into an hourglass shape for measuring microtensile bond strength. Each specimen was attached to a Bencor device and stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test (p<0.05). The microtensile bond strengths of Clearfil SE Bond to sound dentin (32.9) were significantly higher than to caries-affected dentin (15.9). In the second group where acid etching was performed prior to applying Clearfil SE Bond, there were no statistically significant differences between the microtensile bond strengths of sound (19.2) and caries-affected dentin (16.3). While bond strengths to sound dentin were decreased by using additional acid etching prior to applying Clearfil SE Bond, this procedure revealed no statistically significant differences in bond strengths for the caries-affected dentin.     

Regional bond strength of four self-etching primer/adhesive systems to root canal dentin

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the regional bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to root canal dentin using four self-etching primer/adhesive systems. Post spaces were prepared in extracted premolars, and their root canal dentin was treated with one of the following self-etching primer/adhesive systems: ED Primer II and Clearfil Photobond, photo-cure/dual-cure systems of Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, or Clearfil SE Bond. Post spaces were filled with the dual-cure resin core material, and microtensile bond strength (microTBS) at the coronal and apical regions was measured after 24-hour storage. There were no regional differences in microTBS of the photo-cure and dual-cure systems of Clearfil Liner Bond 2V, while microTBS at the coronal region of Photobond and SE Bond groups were higher than those at the apical region. At the apical region, photo-cured Clearfil Liner Bond 2V exhibited significantly higher bond strength than those of the other systems.     

Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study compared the dentin bonding performance of eight adhesive systems using a microtensile bond strength test. METHODS: Thirty bovine teeth were ground to 600-grit to obtain flat root-dentin surfaces. Two conventional adhesive systems (Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus, OptiBond FL), four one-step adhesive systems (Scotchbond 1, Asba S.A.C., Prime and Bond NT, Excite) and two self-etching adhesive materials (Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V and Prompt L-Pop) were evaluated. Each bonding system was applied according to manufacturer's instructions and followed by composite (Z100) application. Immediately after bonding, the teeth were prepared for microtensile testing. Bond strength to dentin was measured using a Vitrodyne V-1000 universal tester. There were 14 replicates for each material. Fractured specimens were further observed by SEM. RESULTS: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus exhibited significantly (p<0.05) higher bond strength values (30.3+/-9.4 MPa) than all other materials. The bond strengths of the other materials were (from highest to lowest): Opitbond FL (22.4+/-4.3 MPa); Scotchbond 1(18.9+/-3.2); Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V (18.9+/-3.0); Prime and Bond NT (18.3+/-6.9); Asba S.A.C. (14.4+/-2.9); Excite (13.8+/-3.7); and Prompt L-Pop (9.1+/-3.3). Statistical comparisons frequently overlapped, but Optibond was significantly (p<0.05) greater than Asba, Excite, and Prompt L-Pop; whereas, Scotchbond 1 was only significantly (p<0.05) greater than Prompt L-Pop. Asba, Excite and Prompt L-Pop were not significantly different. The fracture modes were mostly adhesive. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional adhesive systems produced higher bond strengths to root dentin than most one-step adhesives and one self-etching adhesive; with the exception of one material in each respective system.     

Microtensile bond strength of self-etching adhesive systems to differently prepared dentin

PURPOSE: To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of three self-etching adhesive systems with different degrees of acidity (Clearfil SE Bond, One-Up Bond F, and Xeno III) to dentin prepared with three different methods. METHODS: Forty-five extracted human third molars were ground flat to expose occlusal dentin and polished with 600-grit abrasive paper. All teeth were randomly divided into three groups according to the preparation method: baseline surface (AP#600), steel fissure bur (SB) and regular grit diamond bur (DB). Dentin surfaces were bonded with one of the three adhesive systems; then resin composite was incrementally built up. After storage in 37 degrees C water for 24 hours, specimens were cut and trimmed to create an hourglass shape with cross sectional area of approximate 1 mm2. All specimens were subjected to microtensile bond strength testing. The bond strength data were analyzed with one and two-way ANOVA and Dunnett Multiple comparisons test at P< 0.05. RESULTS: For Xeno III and One-Up Bond F, the microTBS to dentin prepared with the different methods were not significantly different. However, the microTBS of Clearfil SE Bond to dentin prepared with the diamond bur was significantly lower than the other preparation methods. Xeno III produced the lowest microTBS that were statistically different from the other adhesive systems when each preparation method was compared (P< 0.01). SEM observation of the prepared dentin surfaces showed that the diamond bur group produced a thicker smear layer that followed by steel bur and 600-grit paper. Therefore, the smear layer from diamond burs had a greater influence in decreasing microTBS of Clearfil SE Bond that has the weakest acidity self-etching adhesive systems evaluated.     

Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth.

PURPOSE: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the tensile bond strength of three self-etching primers to human primary enamel and dentin. METHODS: Forty (40) freshly extracted primary molars were sectioned bucco-lingually and embedded in self-curing acrylic resin with the facial or lingual surfaces exposed. The specimens were wet ground to 600 grit SiC paper to expose a flat enamel or dentin surface. The materials tested were: Prompt L-Pop (LP2, ESPE), Clearfil SE Bond (CSE, Kuraray America), Etch and Prime 3.0 (EP, Degussa) anda control, Prime and Bond NT (NT, Dentsply/Caulk). The adhesive systems were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. An inverted, truncated cone of composite (Pertac II, ESPE) with a 2-mm bonding diameter was cured using a polytetrafluoroethylene jig. The specimens were debonded in tension using a universal testing machine (Instron) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. RESULTS: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences existed between the four systems and two surfaces. To enamel of primary teeth, Prime and Bond NT had significantly higher bond strength (25.9 MPa) than when bonding with the three acidic primers Prompt L-Pop (18.5 MPa), Etch and Prime 3.0 (19.3 MPa) and Clearfil SE Bond (18.7 MPa). Complete bond failures occurred with Prompt L-Pop and Etch and Prime 3.0 to dentin of primary teeth. With a mean of 39 Mpa, the bond strength to dentin of primary teeth with Clearfil SE Bond was significantly higher than with Prime and Bond NT (12.5 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this in vitro study show that the four adhesive systems tested bonded effectively to enamel of primary teeth, but only CSE achieved adequate bond strengths to dentin of primary teeth.     

Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) of four total-etch adhesives [Excite (EB), Prime&Bond NT (PBNT), Single Bond (SB), and One Coat Bond (OCB)] by comparing them to five self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB), Xeno III (X III), Prompt L-Pop (PLP), AQ Bond (AQB), and Tyrian/One Step plus (TOSP)] at different dentinal areas. In addition the interface between the adhesive resins and dentin was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Superficial occlusal dentin of extracted human molars was exposed and finished with wet 800-grit silicon carbide paper. A block of composite resin was then bonded to the molar samples with the above adhesives according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 24 hours in water at 37 degrees C, the specimens were sectioned into 1 mm thick slices and divided into two regional subgroups according to their relationship to pulp tissue using visual criteria: pulp center and pulp periphery. The slices were then trimmed for the microtensile bond test and subjected to a tensile force and crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Two-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical analyses. In addition the bond strengths for nine adhesive systems for each dentinal area were compared using the Post-Hoc test. The resin-dentin interfaces for each adhesive system were observed under a SEM. RESULTS: Mean mu TBS ranged from (25.2 MPa) for TOSP to (48.9 MPa) for PBNT. The bond strengths of total-etch adhesive systems were not significantly different, and were higher than self-etch adhesive systems, except for CSEB (p<0.05). No significant regional difference was observed for all of the nine adhesive systems (p>0.05). SEM observation showed there is not a standard hybridization for adhesive systems. CONCLUSION: Different dentinal areas may not exhibit as great an influence on bond strengths using new adhesive systems.     

Effect of caries disclosing agents on bond strengths of total-etch and self-etching primer dentin bonding systems to resin composite

This study examined the effect of caries disclosing dyes on composite to dentin shear bond strengths of a total etch, one-bottle and two self-etching, non-rinsing primer dental adhesives. Two caries disclosing dyes were evaluated, Seek and Snoop, with three dentin adhesives, Prime & Bond NT, Prompt L-Pop and Clearfil SE Bond. Extracted human molars stored in 0.2% sodium azide were sectioned longitudinally to expose dentin and embedded in acrylic, leaving the dentin exposed. Each dentin adhesive had three test groups (n=12); a control and one with each of the caries disclosing dyes. The control group had the dentin conditioned and the adhesive applied following the manufacturer's instructions. The caries disclosing dye groups had the dentin first treated for 10 seconds with the disclosing dye, rinsed, then the dentin adhesives were applied as in the controls. A column of Tetric Ceram was bonded after dentin adhesive placement to each specimen and light cured. Specimens were stored in room temperature water for 24 hours, thermocycled for 1,000 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C and tested in shear until failure. Mean +/- SD shear bond values (SBV) were determined in MPa. A one-way ANOVA and Student Neuman Keuls multiple comparison test within each DBS were performed at a significance level ofp<0.05 to analyze the caries disclosing dyes input on SBV versus the controls. Surface analysis to determine the nature of the type of dentin/composite fracture/ separation was also performed. For the fracture analysis data, a Chi-Square test was performed at a significance level of p<0.05. The results of this study indicate that using the two tested caries disclosing dyes, with a total etch, one bottle and two self-etching, non-rinsing primer dental adhesives did not negatively affect the dentin-to-composite shear bond strengths of the three tested dentin bonding systems (p>0.05).     

Bond strength of HEMA-containing versus HEMA-free self-etch adhesive systems to dentin

This study analyzed the bond strength (BS) of HEMA versus HEMA-free self-etch adhesive systems to dentin. The occlusal surface of 20 third molars was removed and the dentin was abraded with 600-grit silicon carbide paper. The teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n = 5) and restored with GO, Adper SE Plus, OptiBond All-In-One, and Clearfil 3S Bond adhesive systems and Filtek Z350 composite. After light curing (600 mW/cm2), the teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 oC for 24 h and were sectioned in the mesiodistal and buccolingual directions to obtain sticks (0.8 mm2). The sticks were subjected to tensile force using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min), and the modes of failure were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. The BS data (in MPa) were treated using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests at 5% significance. GO presented the lowest mean bond strength value (10.57 ± 3.72) and differed significantly from the other materials (p = 0.001), which, in turn, presented statistically similar results (p>0.05) among themselves: Adper SE Plus (29.08 ± 8.93), OptiBond All-In-One (28.36 ± 6.49), and Clearfil 3S Bond (28.62 ± 6.97). Mixed fractures were the most prevalent. It was concluded that the influence of HEMA on BS to dentin was material dependent.     

4种粘接剂对牙本质粘接强度的体外评价

目的比较4种粘接剂对牙本质的粘接强度,并观察粘接界面,评估其抗力性能。方法采用Prime & BondNT（PBNT）、Tetric N-Bond（TNB）、Clearfil SE Bond（CSEB）、G Bond（GB）4种粘接剂粘接树脂于离体下颌第三磨牙的咬合面和近中面,近中面进行剪切力实验,记录断裂峰值;咬合面部分进行微拉伸粘接强度（TBS）测定,扫描电镜观察粘接界面形态。结果在剪切力实验中,PBNT与TNB的抗剪切粘接强度（SBS）最大,两者间差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。PBNT的SBS高于CSEB与GB（P<0.05）;TNB的SBS高于GB（P<0.05）,与CSEB的强度差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。与剪切力实验结果一致,PBNT和TNB的TBS高于CSEB和GB（P<0.05）。扫描电镜下,PBNT和TNB的树脂突比较细长,粘接层较厚;CSEB树脂突短小,GB树脂突更加稀疏。结论全酸蚀粘接剂的粘接强度较自酸蚀粘接剂高,一步法自酸蚀粘接剂强度最低;粘接剂的界面形态与粘接强度存在一定程度的关联性。     

Bond strength of adhesive luting systems to human dentin and their durability

Statement of problemThe durability of adhesive bonding systems to dentin is of importance for restoration longevity; therefore, new adhesive systems should be tested in vitro with long-term artificial aging before clinical application.PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the bonding durability of 3 dual-polymerizing resins and 1 autopolymerizing resin to human dentin with their specific self-etching primers or adhesives.Material and methodsAcrylic resin tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to human dentin disks using either an autopolymerizing resin system (Panavia 21) or dual-polymerizing resin systems (Panavia V5, RelyX Ultimate, and Variolink Esthetic DC) together with the system-specific primer or adhesive. Tensile bond strength was tested after 3 days of water storage or after 150 days of water storage with 37 500 thermocycles (5 °C to 55 °C). The failure mode was evaluated by using a light microscope. In addition, representative specimens were examined by using a scanning electron microscope.ResultsAfter 3 days, the median tensile bond strengths ranged from 18.8 to 29.1 MPa. After artificial aging for 150 days, the median tensile bond strengths ranged from 14.7 to 25.6 MPa. The dual-polymerizing resins showed significantly higher bond strength than the autopolymerizing resin (P≤.05). Artificial aging with thermocycling had no statistically significant influence on tensile bond strength for the adhesive resin systems tested (P>.05). The failure mode was mainly adhesive for the autopolymerizing resin, whereas it was mainly cohesive for the dual-polymerizing resins.ConclusionsThe 3 tested dual-polymerization resin systems provided durable bond strengths to dentin which were higher than those of the autopolymerizing resin.     

Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using self-etching adhesives

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of contamination by ferric sulfate and aluminum chloride astringents on the bond strength of composite bonded to superficial dentin using self-etching adhesives. METHODS: Freshly extracted human teeth were ground to expose superficial dentin and polished to 600 grit. One of three self-etching adhesive systems and restorative composites were bonded to the specimens, with contamination by one of three astringents and five surface conditions (no contamination, moist dentin control; contaminant, air, adhesive; contaminant, water rinse, air, adhesive; contaminant, water rinse, glycolic acid scrub, rinse, adhesive; contaminant, water rinse, chlorhexadine scrub, rinse, adhesive). Composite was bonded to the surfaces in the shape of an inverted, truncated cone (n = 5, 180 specimens total). Specimens were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, then de-bonded in tension with a testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Tensile bond strengths (MPa) were calculated. RESULTS: Means (SD) were compared using analysis of variance. Significant differences (Fisher's PLSD) were found among all variables. SE and ABF had the highest control values, but were affected most by astringent contamination. Ferric sulfate reduced bond strengths the greatest in most cases, and aluminum chloride putty reduced bond strengths the least. Chlorhexadine rinse was most effective in restoring bond strength values.     

Tensile and shear bond strength evaluation of a total-etch three-step and two self-etching one-step dentin bonding systems

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the bond strengths of two new self-etching one-step (Prompt L-Pop 2 and Adper Prompt L-pop) to a total-etch three-step dentin bonding system (Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty human molars were randomly divided into 3 groups of 40 specimens each. Dentin surfaces of each group were bonded with either Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus (SMP), a three-step system, Prompt L-Pop 2 (PLP), or Adper Prompt L-Pop (APLP), two one-step bonding systems--according to manufacturers' recommendations. After adhesive application, a composite resin cylinder was incrementally built in a Teflon mold (5 mm high and 5 mm in diameter). The samples of each group were randomly divided into 2 subgroups of 20 samples each and were tested in a shear bond or in a tensile bond strength mode (crosshead speed 5 mm/min). Statistical analyses were performed with one-way ANOVA and Student's t-test. RESULTS: The significantly lowest shear and tensile bond strength values were obtained with APLP. PLP revealed higher shear bond strengths than APLP and SMP. There were no differences in tensile bond strengths between PLP and SMP (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this in vitro study showed that the chemical modifications (adjunction of monomers and copolymers) of the self-etching all-in-one system APLP did not improve its mechanical properties.     

Bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin and enamel--human vs. bovine primary teeth in vitro.

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro study compared the bonding performance of four adhesive luting agents to dentin and enamel of human and bovine primary teeth, in order to evaluate the suitability of primary bovine hard tissues for replacement of those of human origin for bond testing. METHODS: A composite (Clearfil AP-X) was bonded to specimens from 167 extracted human (n=88) and bovine (n=88) primary teeth using the following adhesive systems: Syntac Assortment (SY), Adaper Prompt L-Pop (PLP), iBond Gluma inside (IB) and Clearfil Protect Bond (PB). After 24h storage in distilled water, shear bond strength was determined according to ISO/TS 11405:2003. The data (n=11 per group) were statistically analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U-test and the error-rates method (ERM). The fracture modes were analyzed with the chi2-test. RESULTS: Bond strength data (ERM) and fracture modes (chi2-test) using human primary teeth were, in general, not statistically different from those of bovine origin. With few exceptions, pair wise comparisons showed the same results. The bond strength data for SY, PLP and PB bonded to primary human and bovine enamel were higher than those to primary human and bovine dentin, for IB vice versa. SIGNIFICANCE: Bovine teeth may be considered as a suitable alternative to human teeth in bond strength tests for primary dentition.