Effect of heparin surface modification in reducing silicone oil adherence to various intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate surface properties of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including a newly fabricated heparin-surface-modified (HSM) silicone IOL, with special reference to their efficiency in reducing potential silicone oil adherence to the IOL optics. SETTING: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. METHODS: Five groups of rigid and foldable IOLs were analyzed in an in vitro test for the percentage of silicone oil adherence: a single-piece foldable hydrophilic-acrylic IOL (n = 9); a single-piece rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL with HSM coating of the lens optic (n = 9); a 3-piece foldable silicone optic IOL with HSM coating of the optic (n = 10); a single-piece standard rigid PMMA IOL (n = 7); and a standard 3-piece foldable silicone optic IOL (n = 9). After the IOLs were immersed in water and then in silicone oil, gross photographs taken. Image analysis was performed to evaluate the percentage of silicone oil coverage of the anterior and posterior surfaces of each IOL optic. RESULTS: The mean silicone oil coverage of the hydrophilic-acrylic IOLs was 5.6% +/- 2.5% (SD); of the HSM PMMA IOLs, 6.2% +/- 4.3%; of the HSM silicone optic IOLs, 6.7% +/- 3.2%; and of the standard PMMA IOLs, 20.3% +/- 13.3%. The mean silicone oil coverage was greatest on the standard silicone optic IOLs, 98.2% +/- 3.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular lenses with a hydrophilic optic have less tendency toward adherence to silicone oil than more hydrophobic designs. A foldable silicone IOL with heparin surface modification can significantly reduce potential silicone oil adherence, comparable to the level achievable with the rigid HSM PMMA designs. Two new foldable IOL styles, the HSM silicone IOL and IOLs in the general class of hydrophilic-acrylic, were highly efficacious in reducing silicone oil adherence. There is now a real choice of foldable lenses for patients with actual or potential vitreoretinal diseases.     

Interaction with intraocular lens materials: Does heavy silicone oil act like silicone oil?

PURPOSE: To determine the interaction of heavy silicone oil with various intraocular lens (IOL) materials and whether heavy silicone oil covers the silicone IOL optic as silicone oil does. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. METHODS: The study group comprised 5 poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOLs, 4 foldable silicone IOLs, 5 foldable hydrophilic acrylic IOLs, and 5 foldable hydrophobic acrylic IOLs. Each IOL was bathed in balanced salt solution (BSS) for 10 minutes and then placed in heavy silicone oil dyed with Sudan Black for another 10 minutes. Afterward, each IOL was reimmersed in BSS for 5 minutes and examined under the light microscope. Digital images were analyzed to determine the optic area covered with heavy silicone oil. RESULTS: The mean heavy silicone oil coverage was 7.05% +/- 7.88% (SD) (range 1.13% to 20.54%) on PMMA IOLs, 100% on silicone IOLs, 12.17% +/- 11.43% (range 1.25% to 31.52%) on hydrophobic acrylic IOLs, and 34.64% +/- 13.28% (range 12.57% to 44.42%) on hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. Heavy silicone oil coverage of silicone IOLs was statistically significantly greater than the coverage of other IOL materials. CONCLUSION: Heavy silicone oil acted the same as silicone oil and covered the entire surface of silicone IOLs.     

Interaction of intraocular lenses with various concentrations of silicone oil: an experimental study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the interaction between various widely used intraocular lenses (IOLs) and silicone oils of different viscosities. Four groups of IOLs, including monoblock foldable hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (Morcher, type 92s); monoblock hydrophobic acrylic IOLs (Acrysof-SA60AT, Alcon); single-piece rigid polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) IOLs (Intraocular Optical International-IOI-65130) and a three-piece foldable silicone optic IOL (CeeOn Edge 911A, Pharmacia UpJohn) were analyzed in vitro to determine the percentage adherence 1,000-centistoke, 1,300-centistoke or 5,000-centistokes silicone oil on the IOL optic. For each IOL type, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean silicone oil coverage (MSC) of the IOL optics for the different viscosities of silicone oil. Silicone IOLs had the highest MSC percentage (79.9%) whereas hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were the least silicone-covered IOLs (7.8%) compared to the other IOL types tested in this study. It is not the concentration of silicone oil that affects silicone oil coverage. When performing small-incision cataract surgery in patients who may require silicone oil injection, foldable hydrophilic acrylic or hydrophobic acrylic lenses should be preferred over standard foldable silicone lenses.     

Analysis of intraocular lens surface properties with atomic force microscopy

PURPOSE: To analyze the surface optics of 4 currently available intraocular lenses (IOLs) with atomic force microscopy. SETTING: Licryl Laboratory, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy. METHODS: The surface roughness and topography of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), silicone, hydrophobic, and hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were evaluated with atomic force microscopy in contact mode. The analysis was performed in a liquid environment using cantilevers with a 0.01 Newtonw/meter nominal elastic constant. Measurements were made over areas of 10 microm2 on different locations of the posterior optic surface of the IOL. RESULTS: Atomic force microscopy permitted high-resolution imaging of IOL optic surface characteristics. Surface topography showed different features with respect to the lens biomaterial. The root-mean-square roughness of the IOL optic surface was significantly different between lenses of various materials (P < .001). The hydrophobic acrylic and silicone IOLs had the lowest mean surface roughness, 3.8 nm +/- 0.2 (SD) and 4.0 +/- 0.5 nm, respectively, and the 2 PMMA IOLs had the highest mean surface roughness, 6.6 +/- 0.3 nm and 7.0 +/- 0.6 nm. CONCLUSIONS: Atomic force microscopy was effective and accurate in analyzing IOL optics. The surface topography of IOLs may vary with different manufacturing processes.     

Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention--2003 survey update

The sixth annual survey of complications associated with foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) requiring explantation or secondary intervention was sent to members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Preoperative data about visual acuity, patient signs and symptoms, and complications requiring IOL removal were evaluated. Complications were then tabulated for each of the following major foldable IOL groups: 3-piece monofocal silicone, 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic, 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic with haptics, 3-piece hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel), 1-piece hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel), 1-piece plate-type silicone, 3-piece multifocal silicone, and Collamer. Two hundred seventy-three surveys were returned for evaluation. Dislocation/decentration, incorrect lens power, IOL calcification, and glare/optical aberrations were the most common reasons for removing foldable IOLs. Good surgical technique, accurate IOL power measurements, and high manufacturing standards for foldable IOL materials and designs are the most important factors in avoiding complications with foldable IOLs.     

Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention--2001 survey update

A survey of the complications associated with foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) that required explantation or secondary intervention was sent to members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Preoperative data about visual acuity, patient signs and symptoms, and complications requiring IOL removal were assessed. Postoperative results and outcomes were also analyzed. Complications and symptoms for each of the following major groups of foldable IOLs explanted were tabulated separately: 3-piece hydrophilic acrylic or hydrogel; 3-piece monofocal silicone; 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic; 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic with haptics; 3-piece multifocal silicone; 1-piece plate-type silicone. A total of 286 surveys were returned for evaluation. Intraocular lens calcification, incorrect lens power, optical visual aberrations, and decentration/dislocation were the most common reasons for removing a foldable IOL. Accurate IOL measurements, meticulous surgical technique, proper patient counseling, and careful manufacture of foldable IOL materials are the most important factors in avoiding complications with foldable IOLs.     

Evaluation of 3 modern single-piece foldable intraocular lenses: clinicopathological study of posterior capsule opacification in a rabbit model

PURPOSE: To assess the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with 3 modern single-piece foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a histopathological study and to compare the potential preventive effects of the IOL design and biomaterial in retarding PCO. SETTING: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. METHODS: Thirty-one rabbit eyes were randomly operated on with phacoemulsification and implantation of 3 single-piece foldable lenses: a hydrophilic acrylic design, the Rayner Centerflex 570H (n = 11); a hydrophobic acrylic design, the Alcon AcrySof SA30AL (n = 10); and a silicone large-hole plate design, the Staar AA-4203VF (n = 10). Central PCO (CPCO), peripheral PCO (PPCO), and Soemmering's ring formation were evaluated 3 weeks after surgery using the Miyake-Apple posterior photographic technique. Histological sections of each globe were prepared to document capsular bag status and performance of IOL geometry. RESULTS: The acrylic IOLs (Centerflex and AcrySof) had lower CPCO and PPCO scores than the silicone plate IOL (P <.05). There was no significant difference in Soemmering's ring formation among the 3 models. Pathological evaluations revealed effective blockage of migrating lens epithelial cells (LECs) at the site of the truncated optic edge of the Centerflex and AcrySof IOLs, even in the presence of large amounts of retained/regenerative cortical material. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof IOL has a hydrophobic surface and the Centerflex a hydrophilic surface, but no correlation to these characteristics could be identified. The single-piece AcrySof optic geometry created a clear-cut barrier effect equal to that of its 3-piece predecessor. The anatomic profile of the Centerflex IOL shows the same characteristics. The optics of both acrylic lenses have square truncated edges that functionally block ingrowth of migrating LECs toward the central visual axis, leaving clear posterior capsules. The square optic edge was an appropriate geometric configuration to create a barrier effect. There was no effect of the biomaterial on PCO prevention.     

Complications with foldable intraocular lenses with subsequent explantation in 1998 and 1999. Results of a questionnaire evaluation

Purpose. A questionnaire was sent to all members of the German Society of Ophthalmic Surgeons to evaluate complications of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) that required explantation. Methods. Information on preoperative visual acuity, foldable IOL design and material as well as the reason for IOL explantation was obtained and analysed. We received 167 completed questionnaires for 1998 and 1999. Results. In 1998 and 1999 the most common reasons for IOL explantation were as follows: incorrect lens power for 56% of the 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs, 16% because of glare or other photic phenomena, 40% of the 1-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were explanted because of incorrect lens power and 30% for IOL damage. For the 3-piece monofocal silicone IOLs, 41% were explanted because of incorrect IOL power and 32% because of IOL decentration. For the 1-piece Hydrogel IOL, 76% were explanted because of opacification of the optic and 14% because of incorrect lens power. Most multifocal IOLs were explanted because of photic phenomena. Conclusion. In addition to the most common complications such as decentration and incorrect IOL power observed in rigid IOLs, new complications associated with foldable IOLs occurred such as optic opacification, glare and photic phenomena. Some complications seemed to appear in particular IOL types (opacification: SC-60BOUV, MDR), while others were observed in all types of foldable lenses. Accurate calculation of the IOL power and further improvement of the IOL material and design seem to be necessary to minimise the rate of explantations.     

Evaluation of giant-cell deposits on foldable intraocular lenses after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of inflammatory giant-cell deposits (IGCDs) on various foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) after combined cataract and glaucoma surgery. SETTING: The Phillips Eye Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. METHODS: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 128 patients were randomized to receive a single-piece, first-generation silicone lens (n = 36); a 3-piece acrylic lens (n = 40); or 3-piece, second-generation silicone lens (n = 52). All patients had combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C by 1 surgeon using a standardized technique. Dilated biomicroscopy was used to identify and quantitate IGCDs on the surface of the IOLs using a 6-point grading scale. RESULTS: Inflammatory giant-cell deposits were identified on 21 of 128 IOLs. Lens design was the most significant risk factor for deposit formation (P =.004). Inflammatory giant-cell deposits were most common in the first-generation silicone plate lens group (33%), less common in the acrylic lens group (15%), and least common in the 3-piece, second-generation silicone group (5.8%). Density of the deposits was significantly greater on the plate lens than the acrylic or the 3-piece silicone lenses (P <.0001). Although IOL design was the most significant risk factor for IGCD formation, other significant risk factors included intraoperative pupil stretch (P =.02) and preoperative miotic use (P =.04). CONCLUSION: Inflammatory giant-cell deposit formation was significantly greater on first-generation silicone plate IOLs than on acrylic or second-generation silicone IOLs. The deposits were somewhat more common on acrylic IOLs than on second-generation silicone IOLs. However, this difference was not clinically or statistically significant.     

Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention--2007 survey update

The tenth annual survey of complications associated with foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) requiring explantation or secondary intervention was sent to members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Preoperative data about visual acuity, patient signs and symptoms, and complications requiring IOL removal were evaluated. Complications were then tabulated for each of the following major foldable IOL groups: 1-piece (plate) silicone, 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic with haptics, 3-piece silicone, 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic, 3-piece hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel), 3-piece unknown, multifocal acrylic, and multifocal silicone. One hundred forty-two surveys were returned for evaluation. Dislocation/decentration, incorrect IOL power, glare/optical aberrations, and IOL calcification were the most common reasons for removing foldable IOLs. Good surgical technique, accurate IOL power measurements, and high manufacturing standards for foldable IOL materials and designs are the most important factors in preventing complications.     

Comparison of glistenings in intraocular lenses with three different materials: 12‐year follow‐up

Purpose: To compare the degree of lens glistenings associated with three intraocular lenses (IOLs) of different materials and examine the relationship between the dioptric power of the optics and lens glistenings in a long‐term study. Setting: St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Methods: Forty‐six eyes of 46 patients underwent standard phacoemulsification and implantation with a heparin‐surface‐modified (HSM) polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) IOL, a silicone IOL or a hydrophobic acrylic IOL. Evaluations of the patients and the glistenings were conducted 11.3–13.4 years postoperatively. The glistenings were examined using Scheimpflug imaging and subsequently analysed using an image analysis program. Results: The median follow‐up time was 12.2 years (range, 11.3–13.4). The hydrophobic acrylic IOL had significantly more lens glistenings than the silicone (p = 0.003) and the PMMA (p = 0.000) IOLs. The silicone IOL had significantly more lens glistenings than the PMMA lens (p = 0.048). The IOL power did not affect the degree of lens glistenings in the hydrophobic acrylic IOL group (p = 0.64). The other groups had too little lens glistenings to evaluate the relationship. Conclusion: In this long‐term follow‐up study, the hydrophobic acrylic IOL had a significantly higher degree of lens glistenings compared to the silicone and PMMA IOLs. The PMMA IOL had almost no lens glistenings. The IOL dioptric power was not significantly correlated with the degree of lens glistenings associated with the hydrophobic acrylic IOL.     

Differential responses of human lens epithelial cells to intraocular lenses in vitro: hydrophobic acrylic versus PMMA or silicone discs

Background The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of different materials of intraocular lenses (IOLs) on human lens epithelial cell behavior, including adhesion, migration, proliferation, apoptosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation (EMT) in vitro. Methods Human lens epithelial cells (SRA 01/04) were grown on hydrophobic acrylic (Acrysof), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and silicone IOLs. Cellular adhesion, migration, proliferation, and apoptotic assays were performed to assess cell behavior. The expression of EMT markers (fibronectin and type I collagen) produced by cells on IOLs was determined by immunoblotting and immunocytochemistry. Results Human lens epithelial cells exhibited preferred adhesion and reduced apoptosis when cultured on acrylic IOLs, in comparison to PMMA and silicone IOLs. Cells grown on acrylic lenses formed a confluent epithelial monolayer. Migration of lens epithelial cells under the acrylic lens was substantially blocked in an in vitro assay. In contrast, cells grown on PMMA and silicone lenses displayed a spindle-shaped, myofibroblast-like morphology, increased apoptosis, reduced adhesion, and enhanced production of EMT proteins such as fibronectin and type I collagen. The migration of lens epithelial cells under PMMA and silicone IOLs was substantial in the in vitro assay. Conclusion This report demonstrates that hydrophobic acrylic lenses are more capsular biocompatible than PMMA and silicone lenses. The in vitro assays are reliable measurements for evaluating the responses of human lens epithelial cells to different IOL materials, and could advance our understanding of the preferential capsular opacification conferred by different IOL materials.     

Silicone and poly(methyl methacrylate) lens decentration associated with asymmetric capsule shrinkage in rabbits.

PURPOSE: To determine whether silicone intraocular lenses (IOLs) are readily affected by capsule shrinkage. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Wakayama Medical College, Wakayama, Japan. METHODS: A D-shaped incision was made in the anterior capsule of 38 eyes of 20 white rabbits. One of 2 IOL types was implanted in the capsular bag: 3-piece silicone or single-piece all-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Twenty-eight eyes were evaluated for IOL rotation and optic decentration. RESULTS: The extent of postoperative decentration and rotation observed with the silicone IOLs did not significantly exceed that of the PMMA IOLs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, coupled with the advantages of small incision surgery, indicate that a silicone IOL is an effective choice.     

Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To determine the incision size after insertion of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) using both a forceps and injectors. SETTING: Intermountain Ocular Research Center, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. METHODS: One hundred patients had phacoemulsification through a clear corneal wound. The incision width was measured before and after IOL implantation. A 3-piece silicone IOL and a 3-piece acrylic IOL (both with an optic diameter of 5.5 mm) were inserted using a forceps. A plate-haptic silicone lens and a 3-piece silicone lens with a 6.0 mm diameter optic were inserted using an injector. RESULTS: The wound size in the group with the 3-piece silicone lens inserted with a forceps enlarged 4.4% (3.23 to 3.38 mm) in the low-power IOL group (15.0 to 20.0 diopters [D]) and 6.2% (3.24 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group (20.5 to 25.0 D). Similarly, the acrylic IOL wound enlarged 5% (3.21 to 3.37 mm) in the low-power IOL group and 6% (3.25 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group when a forceps was used. The 3-piece silicone and plate silicone lenses inserted using an injector enlarged the wound 3.2% and 3.3% (3.02 to 3.11 mm and 3.05 to 3.15 mm), respectively. There was no difference in the wound size with higher IOL powers in eyes with injected lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Clear corneal incisions enlarge after insertion of foldable IOLs in a predictable manner, with a forceps-inserted IOL enlarging the wound diameter more than lenses inserted with an injector. The forceps-inserted lens group also showed a difference in wound size related to IOL power.     

Evaluation of posterior capsule opacification using a new posterior view method in rabbits: single-piece acrylic versus 3-piece acrylic intraocular lens

PURPOSE: To introduce a new procedure for evaluating posterior capsule opacification (PCO) in rabbit eyes and to perform a comparative study of the single-piece and 3-piece acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) on PCO using the new evaluation method. SETTING: Jinshikai Medical Foundation, Nishi Eye Hospital, Osaka, Japan. METHODS: A single-piece or 3-piece acrylic IOL was implanted in 1 eye and the other in the contralateral eye of 5 rabbits. Three weeks after surgery, PCO was scored by Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) in posterior view. Before the posterior view was photographed, the anterior capsule was removed from the whole optic area to eliminate disturbing anterior capsule opacification (ACO) for the PCO evaluation. RESULTS: Posterior capsule opacification could be well observed and viewed in the posterior view so that it could be scored by EPCO without confusion with ACO. The mean PCO score of the single-piece and 3-piece acrylic IOLs was 3.12 +/- 0.19 and 2.41 +/- 0.70, respectively (P < .05 and P = .03, respectively). CONCLUSION: The removal of ACO allowed scoring of PCO by EPCO in rabbit eyes. The single-piece acrylic IOL showed significantly more PCO than the 3-piece acrylic IOL at least 3 weeks after surgery in rabbits.     

Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term response of 6 types of 3-piece intraocular lenses (IOLs) by assessing the cellular reaction on the anterior IOL surface, the behavior of posterior and anterior capsule fibrosis, and flare. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: One hundred eighty eyes were prospectively randomized to receive 1 of 6 IOLs: hydrophilic acrylic Hydroview (Bausch & Lomb) or MemoryLens (ORC); hydrophobic acrylic AcrySof MA60BM (Alcon) or AMO Sensar AR40 (Allergan); hydrophobic silicone CeeOn 920 or CeeOn 911A (Pharmacia). The patients had standardized cataract surgery, postoperative medication, and follow-up. One year after surgery, 155 eyes were assessed. The cellular reaction was evaluated by specular microscopy of the anterior IOL surface. Anterior and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was assessed semiquantitatively by biomicroscopy. Flare was measured with a Kowa FC-1000 laser flare-cell meter. RESULTS: Regarding uveal biocompatibility, the hydrophobic acrylic IOLs showed the highest incidence of late foreign-body cell reaction (AcrySof, 30%; AR40, 17%) followed by the hydrophilic acrylic (MemoryLens, 8%; Hydroview, 4%) and silicone (CeeOn 920, 4%; CeeOn 911A, 0%) (P =.0044). In all cases, the cellular reaction was low grade and clinically insignificant. Regarding capsular biocompatibility, some eyes developed lens epithelial cell (LEC) outgrowth on the anterior IOL surface. The highest incidence was in the hydrophilic acrylic group (Hydroview, 85%; MemoryLens, 27%) followed by the hydrophobic acrylic (AcrySof, 4%; AR40, 3%). No silicone IOL had LECs on the anterior surface. The difference among IOL groups was significant (P =.0001). Anterior capsule opacification was more predominant in the hydrophobic IOL groups. Posterior capsule opacification of the central 3.0 mm area was lowest in the groups with a sharp-edged optic (CeeOn 911A, AcrySof) followed by the round-edged silicone (CeeOn 920), hydrophobic acrylic (AR40), and hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (P =.0001). There was a significant difference in flare between the AR40 lens and the Hydroview, MemoryLens, CeeOn 911A, and CeeOn 920 (P <.004). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative cell count at 1 year. The power calculation showed that the sample size was sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in cellular reaction, although clinically mild in normal eyes, indicate that there were more giant cells with hydrophobic acrylic IOLs and an increased tendency toward LEC outgrowth with hydrophilic lenses. The incidence of PCO was lowest in the hydrophobic IOL groups, especially in groups with a sharp-edged optic. Second-generation silicone IOLs with a sharp edge had good uveal and capsular biocompatibility 1 year after surgery.     

Incision sizes with 5.5 mm total optic, 3-piece foldable intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To determine incision sizes for 5.5 mm total optic, foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) made of silicone or hydrophobic acrylic. SETTING: Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Department of Ophthalmology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. METHODS: In a prospective randomized clinical study including 40 cataract procedures with a temporal limbal tunnel approach, incision sizes for 5.5 mm optic, 3-piece foldable IOLs were measured before and after phacoemulsification and before and after IOL implantation using calipers. Three 5.5 mm optic, 3-piece foldable IOLs were used: 2 silicone (Pharmacia CeeOn 912, Allergan SI-55NB) and 1 hydrophobic acrylic (Alcon AcrySof MA30BA). Ten lenses of each model were implanted with a forceps, and 10 SI-55NB IOLs were implanted with the AMO Unfolder injector. Measurements of the tunnel incisions at various times were statistically evaluated using an analysis of variance and the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Mean tunnel width before and after implantation, respectively, was 3.32 mm+/- 0.06 (SD) and 3.42+/- 0.06 mm for the CeeOn 912 using a Nichamin implantation forceps, 3.28+/- 0.09 mm and 3.42+/- 0.09 mm for the AcrySof MA30BA using a Buratto implantation forceps, 3.00+/- 0.07 mm and 3.10+/- 0.05 mm for the SI-55NB using a Fine Universal II Folder, and 2.66+/- 0.08 mm and 2.81+/- 0.11 mm for the SI-55NB using the AMO Unfolder. Incision sizes before and after implantation were statistically different between 2 IOLs (CeeOn 912 and MA30BA) and the SI-55NB groups. Implantation of the SI-55NB with the Unfolder was associated with significantly smaller incision sizes before and after implantation than implantation with the Fine folder. CONCLUSIONS: Incisions sizes of 2.8 to 3.4 mm were associated with 5.5 mm total optic, 3-piece foldable IOLs. The Allergan SI-55NB high-refractive-index silicone IOL implanted with the AMO Unfolder system provided the smallest postimplantation incision; however, the refractive optic of this IOL is 5.0 mm versus 5.5 mm for of the CeeOn 912 and AcrySof MA30BA.     

Inhibition of lens epithelial cell migration by an acrylic intraocular lens in vitro

We developed a new in vitro system to evaluate the effect of intraocular lenses (IOLs) on the migration of lens epithelial cells (LECs) and determined how acrylic and other IOLs influence LEC migration using this model. In an in vitro system, porcine LECs were cultured in a cell culture chamber insert, containing a collagen membrane, for 10 days with no IOL or with various types of IOLs. Migration of LECs beneath each IOL optic was observed with an inverted-phase microscope. The cell-free areas under the IOL optic, where the LECs had not migrated, were measured. Without IOL, LECs completely covered the collagen membrane within 5 days after plating (5.0 +/- 0.0 days). Complete coverage was slowed by a silicone IOL (6.7 +/- 1.2 days, p = 0.0305). LECs cultured with acrylic or with round- or sharp-edged polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) IOLs did not completely cover the area. Ten days after initiating cultures, the cell-free areas under IOLs with sharp edges (acrylic, 41.1 +/- 8.0%; sharp-edged PMMA, 60.9 +/- 39.0%) were significantly larger than under IOLs with round edges (silicone, 0.0 +/- 0.0%; round-edged PMMA, 1.5 +/- 1.2%). A sharp edge may act as a barrier to LEC migration. Moreover, LEC migration under the acrylic IOL slowed after the LECs had crossed the barrier of the optic edge, perhaps due to acrylic adhesive properties. Only a few LECs reached the collagen membrane beneath the central 3 mm of the acrylic IOL. This new in vitro model was useful in evaluating the effect of various IOLs on LEC migration. Acrylic IOLs inhibited LEC migration by not only a sharp edge but also other factors, such as adhesive properties.     

Capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch after rigid and foldable intraocular lens implantation: experimental study in pediatric human eyes

PURPOSE: To compare the amount of capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch produced by various intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted in pediatric human eyes obtained post-mortem. SETTING: David J. Apple, MD Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A. Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. METHODS: In this nonrandomized comparative study, 16 pediatric human eyes obtained postmortem were divided into 2 groups: Eight eyes were obtained from children younger than 2 years (Group A), and 8 eyes were obtained from children older than 2 years (Group B). All eyes were prepared according to the Miyake-Apple posterior video technique. Six types of rigid and foldable posterior chamber IOLs manufactured from poly(methyl methacrylate) (single-piece), silicone (plate and loop haptics), and hydrophobic acrylic (single-piece and 3-piece AcrySof, Alcon Laboratories) biomaterials were implanted. The capsulorhexis opening and capsular bag diameters were measured before IOL implantation and after in-the-bag IOL fixation with the haptics (or the main axis) at the 3 to 9 o'clock meridian. The percentage of ovaling of the capsulorhexis opening was calculated by noting the difference in the opening's horizontal diameter before and after IOL implantation. The percentage of capsular bag stretch was also calculated by noting the difference in the horizontal capsular bag diameter before and after IOL implantation. RESULTS: All IOLs produced ovaling of the capsulorhexis opening and stretching of the capsular bag parallel to the IOL haptics. There were significant differences in capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch (P<.001, analysis of variance) between the 6 IOL types in each group of eyes. The postimplantation difference was significant only between the single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL (AcrySof) and the other IOLs. The single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL was associated with significantly less capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch in both groups (mean 12.06% +/- 0.59% [SD] and 7.6% +/- 1.47%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Modern rigid and foldable IOLs designed for the adult population implanted in the capsular bag of infants and children produced variable degrees of capsulorhexis ovaling and capsular bag stretch. The Miyake-Apple posterior video technique confirmed the well-maintained configuration of the capsular bag (with minimal ovaling) after implantation of a single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL because of its flexible haptic design.     

Single-piece acrylic intraocular lens implantation in children

PURPOSE: To assess the short-term outcomes of single-piece acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in children by determining the incidence of postoperative visual axis opacification and the need for a second procedure to clear the axis, cell deposits on the IOL optic, posterior synechias, and IOL decentration. SETTING: Miles Center for Pediatric Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. METHODS: This retrospective case review comprised 43 consecutive implantations (33 patients) of a single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL (AcrySof SA30AL or SA60AT, Alcon). An analysis of 42 eyes with posterior capsulectomy and vitrectomy was performed. Eyes with traumatic cataract and secondary IOLs were excluded. RESULTS: Single-piece acrylic IOLs were implanted in 42 eyes. The mean age was 33.5 months +/- 28.9 (SD) (range 0.5 to 110 months) and the mean follow-up, 12.0 +/- 8.2 months (range 1.0 to 27.5 months). Postoperative opacification of the visual axis occurred in 7 eyes (16.7%). Secondary surgical procedures were required in 5 eyes (11.9%). Lens deposits were observed in 8 eyes (19.0%) and synechias, in 5 eyes (11.9%). All IOLs were well centered postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The short-term data suggest implantation of the AcrySof single-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL is safe in the pediatric eye.