Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

In pediatric kidney transplant recipients, tacrolimus has been proposed either for primary immunosuppression or as a rescue agent for refractory acute rejection, chronic rejection, and cyclosporine toxicity. This paper describes our experience with tacrolimus conversion from cyclosporine-based therapy in six selected cases: four due to refractory acute rejections unresponsive to conventional therapy, one to chronic graft rejection, and one to cyclosporine-related hypertrichosis. A "simple-switch" conversion was used without any overlap, starting with a dose of 0.2 mg/kg per day. The time to conversion varied from 10 to 730 days after the transplant. In the patients with acute rejection, the median time to reversal after tacrolimus conversion was 12 days. The symptoms of the patient with cyclosporine toxicity completely resolved without any loss of allograft function. The patient with chronic rejection maintained stable renal function for more than 1 year after conversion. A new onset of post-transplant diabetes mellitus and dose-related nephrotoxicity were recorded as adverse events. In conclusion, our experience suggests that tacrolimus can play an important role in the salvage treatment of pediatric kidney transplantations with deteriorating graft function due to acute rejection refractory to standard therapy. Tacrolimus conversion also provides excellent results in the presence of cyclosporine toxicity.     

心脏移植后采用他克莫司替代环孢素A治疗的体会

目的 探讨心脏移植后因排斥反应或环孢素A(CsA)不良反应而将CsA替换为他克莫司(FK506)的临床效果.方法 6例原位心脏移植患者中,5例因发生严重排斥反应或排斥反应不能控制、1例因CsA的肝毒性,而将CsA替换为FK506,其它免疫抑制剂不变,转换时间为术后(167.8±166.7)d,FK506的用量为(6.0±1.4)mg/d,维持其血药浓度在(14.7±5.6) μg/L.心内膜心肌活检(EMB)联合超声心动图监测排斥反应.结果 随访(17.1±6.0)个月,6例患者全部存活,2例心功能下降者在换用FK506后心功能恢复正常.换用FK506前,排斥反应评分为(2.50±0.42)分,换用FK506后,排斥反应评分降至(0.60±0.39)分(P＜0.01).1例患者转换为FK506后3周,出现发热及胸腔积液,经抗结核治疗1周后好转,半年后停止抗结核治疗,患者至今存活1年;转换为FK506后,4例患者因血糖升高(其中2例转换前血糖即升高)需用胰岛素治疗;换用FK506后,CsA所致的多毛消失,牙龈增生减轻.结论 心脏移植后采用CsA进行免疫抑制治疗者,若反复发生排斥反应或出现不能耐受的CsA不良反应,可将CsA替换为FK506,临床效果明显.     

Tacrolimus as a rescue immunosuppressant after heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study is to review our experience with tacrolimus as a rescue immunosuppressant for heart transplant recipients with refractory rejection or cyclosporine intolerance. METHODS: From June 1995 to November 1998, 15 cardiac transplant recipients were converted from our standard cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen to a tacrolimus-based treatment. Each patient had been treated with cyclosporine, azathioprine and steroids. Six were switched to tacrolimus for persistent rejection, four for recurrent acute rejection and five for severe debilitating side-effects attributed to cyclosporine. All ten patients converted to tacrolimus because of rejection had been treated with high-dose methylprednisolone intravenously and four had also received anti-lymphocyte globulin (ALG; one patient) or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG; three patients) preparations. RESULTS: The time between transplantation and conversion to tacrolimus ranged from 44 to 1866 (median, 380) days. The range of follow-up after conversion was 84-1379 (median, 806) days. Eleven patients are alive with a follow-up period of 764+/-435 (median, 820) days. Four patients died between 90 and 930 (median, 464) days after conversion. The average number of episodes of acute rejection/recipient decreased from 2.1+/-1.6 on the cyclosporine regimen to 0.2+/-0.4 on the tacrolimus regimen (P<0.001). When the incidence of acute rejection was normalized for follow-up times (episodes/100 patient-days), the results were 1.1+/-1.4 and 0.07+/-0.2, respectively (P<0.01). The persistent/recurrent rejection resolved in all ten patients who were converted to tacrolimus. None of the five cyclosporine intolerant patients converted to tacrolimus experienced rejection after the changeover. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, conversion from a cyclosporine-based to a tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression has been shown to be an effective and safe approach to the management of patients with persistent or recurrent cardiac allograft rejection or those with cyclosporine intolerance.     

Is acute rejection the key predictor for long-term outcomes after renal transplantation when comparing calcineurin inhibitors?

In the context of modern immunosuppressive regimens, the overall incidence of acute rejection may no longer be the most accurate surrogate marker for long-term kidney graft survival. The type, severity, timing, and clinical course of acute rejection each influence the impact of a rejection episode, and if renal function recovers fully, there appears to be no survival disadvantage. Randomized clinical trials in renal transplant patients have generally shown that there are fewer acute rejection episodes with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine, although with contemporary regimens, including mycophenolate acid, this difference is less marked than previously. In randomized trials, kidney graft survival rates with cyclosporine and tacrolimus have proven similar. Large-scale registry analyses have consistently shown no graft survival benefit with tacrolimus vs cyclosporine, and indeed, 2 such analyses have reported significantly higher graft survival with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression compared with tacrolimus in living-donor kidney transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil. There are no reports of improved patient survival with either calcineurin inhibitor after kidney transplantation. In conclusion, the perception of better efficacy with tacrolimus vs cyclosporine based on the incidence of acute rejection is not supported by a difference in graft or patient survival after kidney transplantation.     

Efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory rejection in heart and lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Refractory acute cellular rejection may occur despite triple-drug immunosuppression (cyclosporine A, steroids, azathioprine/mycophenolate mofetil). The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of tacrolimus rescue therapy in patients maintained on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (CBI). METHODS: Between December 1993 and October 1996, 208 patients underwent thoracic organ transplantation at the Hospital of the University of Wisconsin at Madison. One hundred forty-nine patients underwent heart replacement; 59 underwent lung transplantation. One hundred thirty-nine of the heart transplant cohort received CBI preceded by induction therapy with OKT3. Forty-six of the lung transplant cohort received CBI without induction cytolytic therapy. Refractory rejection was defined as failure to respond to high-dose steroids (500 mg to 1 g IV methylprednisolone for 3 days) and/or monoclonal antibody therapy (OKT3, 5 to 10 mg IV/day for 7 to 14 days). In patients with refractory rejection, cyclosporine was replaced with tacrolimus. RESULTS: Overall, 16% (30/185) of patients receiving CBI experienced refractory rejection. Thirty-one episodes of grade IIIa or greater rejection occurred in 11% (15/139) of heart transplant recipients. Twenty episodes of grade II to IV rejection occurred in 33% (15/46) of lung transplant recipients. After tacrolimus rescue therapy, 93% (14/15) of patients in the heart transplant group converted to grade II or less rejection. Refractory rejection was reversed in 73% (11/15) of the lung transplant group. Reversal was documented at biopsy in all (8/8) lung recipients in whom it had been histologically identified. FEV1 values of 3 additional patients stabilized. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of refractory rejection in thoracic organ transplant recipients on CBI is significant. Reversal of refractory rejection follows rescue immunotherapy with tacrolimus.     

Single-center experience with primary orthotopic liver transplantation with FK 506 immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy for primary orthotopic liver transplantation of a new immunosuppressive agent, FK 506 (tacrolimus, Prograf, Fujisawa USA, Deerfield, IL), was determined. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: After 3 years of preclinical research, a clinical trial of FK 506 for orthotopic liver transplantation was begun in February 1989, first as a rescue therapy for patients with intractable rejection with conventional immunosuppression, then as a primary drug. METHODS: Between August 1989 and December 1993, 1391 recipients (1188 adult and 203 pediatric) of primary liver allografts were treated with FK 506 from the outset. Results from these patients were analyzed and compared with those of 1212 historical control patients (971 adult and 241 pediatric) given cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. RESULTS: Actuarial survival at 4 years was 86.2% with FK 506 versus 65.5% with cyclosporine in the pediatric patients (p < 0.0000) and 71.4% versus 65.5% in the adults (p < 0.0005). The need for retransplantation was reduced significantly for FK 506 patients. Four-year graft survival was 77.0% with FK 506 versus 48.4% with cyclosporine in the pediatric patients (p < 0.0000), and 61.9% with FK 506 versus 51.4% with cyclosporine in the adult recipients (p < 0.0000). Regression analysis revealed that reduction in mortality or graft loss from uncontrollable rejection, sepsis, technical failure, and recurrent original liver disease were responsible for the improved results with FK 506 therapy. CONCLUSIONS: FK 506 is a potent and superior immunosuppressive agent for orthotopic liver transplantation.     

Tacrolimus as secondary intervention vs. cyclosporine continuation in patients at risk for chronic renal allograft failure

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal allograft failure (CRAF) is the leading cause of graft loss post-renal transplantation. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as secondary intervention in cyclosporine-treated kidney transplantation patients with impaired allograft function as indicated by elevated serum creatinine (SCr) levels. METHODS: Patients receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression who had an elevated SCr at least 3 months post-renal transplantation were enrolled. Treatment allocation was 2:1 to switch to tacrolimus or continue cyclosporine. This analysis was performed after 2 yr; patients will be followed for an additional 3 yr. RESULTS: There were 186 enrolled and evaluable patients. On baseline biopsy, 90% of patients had chronic allograft nephropathy. Baseline median SCr was 2.5 mg/dL in both treatment groups. For patients with graft function at month 24, SCr had decreased to 2.3 mg/dL in the tacrolimus-treated patients and increased to 2.6 mg/dL in the cyclosporine-treated patients (p = 0.01). Acute rejection occurred in 4.8% of tacrolimus-treated patients and 5.0% of cyclosporine-treated patients during follow-up. Two-year allograft survival was comparable between groups (tacrolimus 69%, cyclosporine 67%; p = 0.70). Tacrolimus-treated patients had significantly lower cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels and also had fewer new-onset infections. Cardiac conditions developed in significantly fewer tacrolimus-treated patients (5.6%) than cyclosporine-treated patients (24.3%; p = 0.004). Glucose levels and the incidences of new-onset diabetes and new-onset hyperglycemia did not differ between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus results in improved renal function and lipid profiles, and significantly fewer cardiovascular events with no differences in the incidence of acute rejection or new-onset hyperglycemia.     

Conversion from cyclosporine A to tacrolimus after kidney transplantation due to hyperlipidemia

Abstract As more than 90 % of renal grafts retain their function 1 year after renal transplantation, side effects of immunosuppressive therapy gain more and more importance. In a randomised prospective study, we investigated the effects of conversion from cyclosporine A to tacrolimus due to hyperlipidemia in recipients of renal allografts. Fifty‐seven patients with stable graft function treated with cyclosporine were randomly assigned to conversion to tacrolimus or continuation of their current therapy and followed for 1 year. Twenty‐seven patients were switched and 30 patients remained on cyclosporine A. Cholesterol levels decreased significantly in the tacrolimus group as compared to controls in the intent to treat analysis. When only those patients were evaluated who received cyclosporine or tacrolimus during the whole study, statistical significance was even more pronounced. Triglyceride levels decreased in the tacrolimus group, whereas they increased in controls. Creatinine levels remained stable and no acute rejection was observed. A switch to tacrolimus is a safe alternative in cases of hyperlipidemia after renal transplantation.     

Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: three-year follow-up in a single center

INTRODUCTION: The 1-year results of the phase III US Multicenter Trial comparing tacrolimus- and cyclosporine (Sandimmun)-based immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation revealed a significant reduction in the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes among patients maintained on tacrolimus. This retrospective, nonrandomized, single-center study represented 3-year data for patient and graft survival and safety in the tacrolimus-treated patients. METHODS: Among 97 consecutive kidney transplant recipients 41 who received tacrolimus and 56 cyclosporine-based immunosuppression were followed for 3 years for patient and graft survivals and for the incidence of acute rejection episodes as well as serious adverse events. RESULTS: The 3-year patient and graft survival rates for tacrolimus and cyclosporine were similar (91.0% vs 90.2%, 96.5% vs 95.0%). However, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was significantly lower in the tacrolimus (17.1%) compared with the cyclosporine group (35.7%, P = .043). There was a higher incidence of headache, posttransplant diabetes, and alopecia reported in the tacrolimus group, whereas hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and hirsutism were more frequent in the cyclosporine group. The incidences of hand tremor, hyperkalemia, and viral infections were comparable in both groups. Two patients in the tacrolimus group were converted to cyclosporine due to nephrotoxicity and posttransplant diabetes, respectively, whereas 12 patients in the cyclosporine group were converted to tacrolimus as rescue therapy for acute rejection (41.7%), gingival hyperplasia (33.3%), nephrotoxicity (8.3%), neurotoxicity (8.3%), and hirsutism (8.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The 3-year results of tacrolimus treatment show excellent efficacy and safety in kidney transplantation. Due to different side-effect profiles, it is necessary to develop individualized immunosuppressive strategies in kidney transplant recipients.     

Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in a cardiac transplant patient with chronic renal failure.

Chronic renal failure triggered by calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression is a common complication after cardiac transplantation. Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are 2 newer immunosuppressive agents with no documented nephrotoxic side effects. This case report describes a patient with ongoing chronic renal failure 10 months after cardiac transplantation on cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy. Conversion of the immunosuppressive regimen from cyclosporine to sirolimus and MMF resulted in freedom from acute rejection, excellent cardiac graft function and consistently improved renal function. This case illustrates the beneficial potential of sirolimus and MMF as CNI-free and safe long-term immunosuppression in a patient with chronic renal failure after heart transplantation.     

Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients: safety, metabolic changes, and pharmacokinetic comparison

BACKGROUND: Although conversion between tacrolimus and cyclosporine has been performed when indicated for rejection or adverse effects, the safety and metabolic outcome of elective conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine has not previously been examined. METHODS: Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine was performed in 19 recipients of cadaver renal transplants at 3-6 months after transplantation. Pharmacokinetic profiles and biochemical studies were performed three times, in steady state, before, and after conversion. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival was 100% at 3 months after conversion, with no rejection episodes. Three patients have been subsequently converted back to tacrolimus, two for rejection and one for hirsutism. There were no significant changes in creatinine, urate, or blood sugar levels after conversion, but the mean plasma magnesium rose from 0.73 (0.63-0.97) to 0.82 (0.65-1) mmol/L (P=0.037), and the mean plasma cholesterol rose from 5.2 (3.4-6.8) to 5.5 (3.8-7.6) mmol/L (P=0.033). Pharmacokinetic profiles were measured before and after conversion, and showed that cyclosporine (Neoral) exhibited significantly less interpatient and intrapatient variability than tacrolimus, for area under the curve (AUC), maximum concentration after dose (Cmax), minimum concentration after dose (Cmin), and time to maximum concentration (Tmax). CONCLUSION: This is the first study that has examined the outcome of conversion from tacrolimus- to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in stable patients after renal transplantation. This conversion was performed without early immunological hazard, but there was a small rise in blood cholesterol levels after conversion. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that cyclosporine in the form of Neoral exhibited less inter- and intrapatient variability than tacrolimus, although this is of uncertain clinical significance.     

Conversion of renal transplant recipients from cyclosporin to low-dose tacrolimus for refractory rejection

Abstract Twenty-five patients with refractory rejection following renal transplantation were converted from cyclosporin to tacrolimus in an attempt to salvage the allografts. All patients had received two or three pulses of methylprednisolone, 6 had OKT3, 14 had antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and 2 had both OKT3 and ATG prior to conversion. The median time from transplantation to conversion to tacrolimus was 32 days (range 12–322). Patients underwent a simple switch from cyclosporin- to tacrolimusbased therapy with tacrolimus administered at a median dose of 0.15 mg/kg per day. Doses were adjusted according to clinical response and trough blood levels. Twenty-one of the 25 patients (84 %) with refractory rejection showed evidence of reversal of rejection as indicated by a significant reduction in serum creatinine (Student's paired t -test, P < 0.05) following conversion to tacrolimus. None of these patients had further episodes of rejection. Three patients had ongoing rejection and returned to dialysis, and 1 patient showed deteriorating renal function associated with a cytomegalovirus infection. Of 18 patients currently on tacrolimus, 15 have improved renal function and 3 have shown no further deterioration. We conclude that low-dose tacrolimus appears to be effective in salvaging renal allografts with resistant rejection.     

他克莫司延缓移植肾功能衰竭进程的临床研究

目的　观察他克莫司 (FK5 0 6 )延缓慢性移植肾功能衰竭进程的有效性及安全性。方法　选择肾移植术后肾功能异常 ,并经病理证实为慢性排斥反应者 ,将原先以环孢素A (CsA)为基础的免疫抑制方案切换成FK5 0 6为主的免疫抑制方案 ,FK5 0 6起始剂量为 0 .15mg·kg-1·d-1。结果　 10例肾移植受者在换用FK5 0 6治疗后 ,血胆固醇水平和血压明显降低 ,用于控制高血压的药物明显减少 ,血肌酐水平明显降低 ,肾小球滤过率得到明显改善。结论　FK5 0 6对延缓移植肾慢性排斥引起的肾功能衰竭的进程是安全有效的。     

Tacrolimus rescue therapy for children with acute renal transplant rejection

Seventeen children with renal transplants (11 living-related, age 2–18 years) were converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus because of acute rejection that failed to respond to high-dose corticosteroids. Resistance to corticosteroids was confirmed by renal biopsy in 14 patients, and assumed in 3 patients because of failure of serum creatinine to improve to baseline values. Four patients were also treated with OKT3, and 15 children had been receiving mycophenolate maintenance therapy prior to conversion to tacrolimus. Rejection occurred at 2–174 weeks post transplant (mean 52 weeks). Actuarial 1- and 2-year graft survival was 87% and 78%. Three children progressed to end-stage renal disease after 4, 12, and 13 months of tacrolimus. The remaining 14 children have functioning allografts after 20–168 weeks of treatment (mean 80 weeks). All 14 children exhibit stable or improved renal function: serum creatinine 1.1±0.7 mg/dl versus 2.0±0.9 mg/dl prior to tacrolimus. In conclusion, tacrolimus was effective therapy for both early and late acute rejection in children who failed to respond to high-dose corticosteroids. No significant short-term adverse effects were encountered. Received: 29 August 2000 / Revised: 31 July 2001 / Accepted: 31 July 2001     

Neoral rescue therapy in transplant patients with intolerance to tacrolimus

BACKGROUND: The calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine and tacrolimus, are the mainstay of current immunosuppressive regimens for the prevention of acute rejection in organ transplantation. The choice of the individual agent used often depends on the preference of the Transplant Center and patient type. Adverse effects associated with tacrolimus may impact its clinical utility in many patients. This study characterizes the clinical outcomes of transplant recipients who experienced adverse effects from tacrolimus and were converted to cyclosporine-microemulsion-based (Neoral([cyclosporine, USP] MODIFIED) therapy. METHODS: Hepatic or renal allograft recipients unable to maintain adequate immunosuppression with a tacrolimus-based regimen for reasons of toxicity or efficacy were recruited for this study and converted to cyclosporine-microemulsion-based therapy. Data were collected on drug dosing, trough concentrations, and treatment duration, as well as detailed information on tacrolimus-associated toxicities that prompted rescue with cyclosporine-microemulsion. Furthermore, clinical and laboratory data related to the clinical course of the patients after conversion to cyclosporine-microemulsion were recorded for up to 1 yr following conversion. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven transplant recipients were enrolled in this study. Predominant reasons for discontinuation of tacrolimus were neurotoxicity (55%), diabetes (24%), nephrotoxicity (15%), and gastrointestinal intolerance (24%). Patients frequently had multiple symptoms prompting rescue therapy with cyclosporine-microemulsion. Over 70% of subjects had improvement or resolution of their tacrolimus-associated adverse symptoms within 3 months post-conversion. Acute rejection episodes occurred in 27% of patients converted to cyclosporine-microemulsion. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine-microemulsion rescue therapy in patients experiencing adverse clinical effects associated with tacrolimus is an effective treatment option which leads to resolution of these adverse effects in the majority of patients, and allows for satisfactory clinical outcomes.     

Glucose metabolism in the first 3 years after renal transplantation in patients receiving tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.

The long-term effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine on pancreatic islet cell function in renal transplant recipients are unclear. Therefore, a prospective, randomized, longitudinal study was performed that compared glucose metabolism in adult kidney allograft recipients on tacrolimus versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Twenty-three white renal allograft recipients, randomized for either therapy with cyclosporine or tacrolimus, underwent intravenous glucose tolerance tests 6 times during the first 3 yr after transplantation. Concomitant therapy (low-dose steroids and azathioprine) was the same in both groups. Insulin sensitivity index (kG), insulin resistance (insulin/glucose ratio and homeostasis model assessment), and C-peptide and insulin secretion were calculated. Trough levels of tacrolimus and cyclosporine were measured. The occurrence of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus was prospectively monitored. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA for repeated measures, and parametric and nonparametric tests were also performed. Although only one patient treated with cyclosporine developed posttransplantation diabetes mellitus, kG levels were below normal in up to one-third of both patients who received tacrolimus and cyclosporine. The only significant difference between patients who received tacrolimus and those who received cyclosporine was in pancreatic secretion capacity at week 3 after transplantation, when the increment of C-peptide secretion was 57% lower and the increment of insulin secretion was 48% lower for patients receiving tacrolimus. In both groups, from week 3 to month 6, there was a tendency toward an increase in kG, despite a significant increase in fasting glucose and insulin resistance calculated by homeostasis model assessment. After month 6, there were no significant changes in any of the parameters of glucose metabolism, indicating that long-term use of either tacrolimus or cyclosporine does not cause chronic, cumulative pancreatic toxicity.     

Cyclosporine in heart and heart-lung transplantation

At Stanford University Medical Center from January 1968 until January 1984, 288 patients received 313 heart transplants. The immunosuppressive regimen before December 1980 consisted of azathioprine and prednisone, with or without rabbit antithymocyte globulin. After that time cyclosporine replaced azathioprine. In 92 recipients of 95 heart allografts, the 1- and 3-year survival rates were 82% and 65% to 70% respectively. In the 3 years from March 1981 to March 1984, successful heart-lung transplantation was accomplished in 13 of 19 recipients, using cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Survival ranged from 1 to 38 months. While it is true that cyclosporine has improved survival in heart transplant recipients, has allowed successful heart-lung transplantation to be performed, has shortened intensive care unit and total hospital stays and therefore hospital costs, and has allowed easier management of rejection and infection, several disconcerting problems have not yet been resolved. These include hypertension that is difficult to control and renal dysfunction in all patients, and the fact that cellular and humoral rejection still occurs, as manifested by graft atherosclerosis, bronchiolitis obliterans and classic acute rejection. Better understanding and application of cyclosporine immunosuppression will undoubtedly minimize both cyclosporine- and non-cyclosporine-related postoperative complications and will improve survival even further.     

Sirolimus for rescue and primary immunosuppression in transplanted children receiving tacrolimus

AIMS: The role of sirolimus (SRL) as a rescue agent (n=42) and as a component of primary immunosuppression (n=8) was evaluated in a mixed population of 50 transplanted children receiving tacrolimus (liver: 26, heart: 5, intestinal: 5, liver-intestine: 9, lung: 1, bone marrow: 1, liver-kidney: 1, multivisceral: 1). Rescue indications for tacrolimus (TAC) failure were recurrent acute rejection and acute rejection complicating withdrawal of immunosuppression in posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Rescue indications for TAC toxicity were nephrotoxicity, pancreatitis, seizures, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and graft-versus-host disease. RESULTS: Mean age at rescue was 11.5 years and mean follow-up was 204 (range 18-800) days. As primary immunosuppression, SRL+TAC prevented early acute rejection in 7/8 children. The indication for rescue resolved in 33/42 children. In children with TAC toxicity, this was associated with decrease in TAC doses by 50%, significant improvements in renal function, and continuing decline in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral load in PTLD patients. Serious adverse events led to discontinuation of SRL in 9/42 rescue patients, 3 of them also experienced acute rejection. Three additional children also experienced acute rejection on SRL therapy (overall incidence 6/50, 12%). Pharmacokinetic analysis in the first week of SRL administration suggested a short half-life (11.8+/-5.5 hr, n=21). CONCLUSIONS: SRL and reduced-dose TAC may achieve adequate immunosuppression without compromising renal function or enhancing EBV viremia significantly.     

Liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis: influence of primary immunosuppression on survival

INTRODUCTION: Liver transplantation is the only established curative therapy for end-stage primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, the influence of primary immunosuppression on long-term patient and graft survival is still controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 1372 patients who underwent liver transplantation from April 1989 to January 2001, 95 (6.9%) suffered from PBC. The primary immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine (CyA; n = 56) and tacrolimus (FK; n = 39). RESULTS: The median survival of all PBC patients at 5 years was 92% and at 10 years, 90%. There was no difference between the two primary immunosuppression agents. Seven patients died, including five in the cyclosporine group (median = 25 months) and two in the tacrolimus cohort (median = 37 months). One CyA patient group died due to PBC recurrence. Seven patients underwent retransplantation without any difference in primary immunosuppression (CyA 7%; FK 10%). Fifty patients developed an acute rejection episode (CyA 57%; FK 46%); 2 patients, chronic rejection (CyA 2%; FK 4%). Fifty-five patients developed AMA titers after liver transplantation (CyA 66%; FK 46%). Patients presented cyclosporine-based regimens showed significantly (P = .001) more side effects. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up after liver transplantation for PBC shows excellent organ and patient survival. The choice of the primary immunsuppressant had no significant influence on patient survival, PBC-related graft loss, or development of acute or chronic rejection episodes.     

Impaired erythropoietin production in liver transplant recipients: the role of calcineurin inhibitors.

Anemia is common following liver transplantation. Because cyclosporine inhibits erythropoietin (Epo) production in experimental models, we investigated whether Epo production was impaired in liver transplant recipients receiving a cyclosporine- or tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. First, serum Epo levels were measured before and 1 year after transplantation in 35 liver transplant recipients. Second, serum Epo levels were compared in a large series of liver transplant recipients with stable graft and renal functions: 27 receiving a cyclosporine-based and 31 receiving a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. A reference group was made up of 22 blood donors and 21 nontransplanted subjects with iron-deficiency anemia. Serum Epo levels were significantly lower after than before liver transplantation, especially in cyclosporine-treated patients. Serum Epo concentrations correlated with hematocrit values in both transplant recipients and control subjects. Using multiple linear regression models, the polynomial relationship between hematocrit and serum Epo values was similar to the control group in patients under tacrolimus, whereas Epo production was significantly reduced in patients under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Hematocrit values and the type of calcineurin inhibitor were the only parameters independently related to Epo levels. In conclusion, cyclosporine, but not tacrolimus, inhibits Epo production at the doses used in clinical practice.