Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumours

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a weekly administration of paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx; Schering Plough Pharmaceutical) in patients with advanced solid tumours. 19 pretreated patients with solid tumours received escalated doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (6-12 mg/m(2)) as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by a fixed dose of paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly for 4 consecutive weeks in cycles of 6 weeks. DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grades 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity or treatment delay due to unresolved toxicity during cycle 1. The MTD was reached at the dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin of 10 mg/m(2)/week and paclitaxel of 80 mg/m(2)/week. The DLTs were treatment delay due to grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhoea. A total of 55 chemotherapy cycles were administered, and grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in seven cycles (13%); the non-haematological toxicity was mild with grades 2/3 diarrhoea occurring in 4 (7%), grades 2-4 asthenia in 11 (20%) and grade 2 mucositis in 7 (13%) cycles. There was no case with more than a 10% LVEF decrease after a median of 3 (range 2-6) administered cycles/patients. One patient with breast cancer and 1 with ovarian cancer experienced a major partial response. The weekly administration of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at the dose of 10 mg/m(2) in combination with paclitaxel at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive weeks, in cycles of 6 weeks which represent the recommended doses for further phase II studies, is a well tolerated regimen, which merits further evaluation in tumours known to be sensitive to taxanes and/or anthracyclines.     

Phase I/II study of cisplatin combined with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel administered weekly with a fixed dose of cisplatin, and to assess the toxicity and activity of this combination, we conducted a phase I/II trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were eligible. Paclitaxel, at a starting dose of 40 mg x m(-2) week(-1) on days 1, 8, and 15, was combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin 80 mg x m(-2) on day 1. Chemotherapy was given in a 4-week cycle. In this phase I/II study, 38 patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were neutropenia, fatigue, and omission of treatment due to leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, or febrile neutropenia. The MTD and RD were estimated to be 70 mg x m(-2). Of the 37 assessable patients, 23 had a partial response and one had a complete response. Overall response rate was 62.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 46.5-77.7%). The progression-free survival, the median survival time, and the 1-year survival rate were 5.5 months, 13.7 months, and 56.9%, respectively. This regimen is tolerable and very active against advanced NSCLC, and its efficacy should be confirmed in a phase III study.     

Phase I/II study of DHA-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin in patients with advanced malignant solid tumours

DHA-paclitaxel is a conjugate of paclitaxel and the fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid. Preclinical studies have demonstrated increased activity, relative to paclitaxel, with the potential for an improved therapeutic ratio. We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated doses of DHA-paclitaxel and carboplatin when administered in combination. Two cohorts of patients were treated: carboplatin AUC 5 with DHA-paclitaxel 660 mg m(-2) and carboplatin AUC 5 with DHA-paclitaxel 880 mg m(-2). Both drugs were given on day 1 every 21 days. A total of 15 patients were enrolled with a median age of 59 years (range 33-71). All patients had advanced cancer refractory to standard treatment, performance status 0-2 and were without major organ dysfunction. A total of 54 cycles of treatment were delivered. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen in the first cohort of three patients. In an expanded second cohort, neutropenia was the main DLT, occurring in the first cycle of treatment in five of 12 patients: three of these patients and one additional patient also experienced dose-limiting grade 3 transient rises in liver transaminases. No alopecia was seen and one patient developed clinically significant neuropathy. One partial response was seen in a patient with advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophago-gastric junction and 12 patients had stable disease with a median time to progression of 184 days (range 60-506 days). The recommended phase II dose in pretreated patients is Carboplatin AUC 5 and DHA-paclitaxel 660 mg m(-2) given every 21 days. Further studies with Carboplatin AUC 5 and DHA-paclitaxel 880 mg m(-2), given every 28 days, are warranted in chemo-naive patients.     

Phase I dose-escalation study of aflibercept in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

This phase I cohort study investigated aflibercept (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) trap) plus docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Methods:

Patients received intravenous aflibercept 4, 5, or 6 mg kg⁻¹ with docetaxel and cisplatin (75 mg m⁻² each) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objectives were determining cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the aflibercept recommended phase II trial dose (RP2D) for this combination.

Results:

During the dose-escalation phase (n=16), there were two DLTs of febrile neutropenia (at 4 and 5 mg kg⁻¹). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis was subsequently recommended. The RP2D of aflibercept was established at 6 mg kg⁻¹ and administered to 14 additional patients. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (43.3%), stomatitis (20.0%), asthenia/fatigue (20.0%), and hypertension (16.7%). All-grade AEs associated with VEGF blockade included epistaxis (83.3%), dysphonia (70.0%), proteinuria (53.3%), and hypertension (50.0%). There were five partial responses (16.7%) and 18 cases of stable disease (60.0%) (lasting >3 months in 10 patients). There were no pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between the three drugs.

Conclusion:

Aflibercept 6 mg kg⁻¹ with docetaxel and cisplatin 75 mg m⁻² every 3 weeks is the RP2D based on tolerability, antitumour activity, and PKs.     

Phase I study of weekly high-dose cisplatin combined with long-term oral etoposide in advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase I study we showed that single-agent cisplatincan be given weekly for six weeks at a dose of 80 mg/m²/wk.It has been suggested that etoposide has synergistic activitywith cisplatin and the drug can be given orally continuously.We therefore performed a phase I study with weekly cisplatincombined with oral etoposide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with metastases of a solid tumor were enteredin the study. Cisplatin was administered in hypertonic saline(NaCl 3%). Etoposide was administered as 50-mg capsules. RESULTS: The starting dose was cisplatin weekly at a dose of 70 mg/m²for six weeks combined with daily oral etoposide at a dose of50 mg. At the maximum tolerable dose of cisplatin 75 mg/m²/wkand etoposide 50 mg/m² daily, leukocytopenia and thrombocytopeniawere dose-limiting toxic effects which resulted in frequenttreatment delays. Other toxicities were mild. Finally, a doseof cisplatin 70 mg/m²/wk weeks 1–2–3 and weeks 5–6–7in combination with etoposide 50 mg orally days 1–15 anddays 29–43 combined a high median cisplatin dose intensityof 52.5 mg/m²/wk with a good patient tolerance. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to administer frequently dosed cisplatin in combinationwith oral etoposide. Leuko-cytopenia and thrombocytopenia aredose-limiting toxicities. The schedule will be explored furtherin phase n studies. phase I, cisplatin, etoposide, dose intensity     

Phase I dose-finding study of weekly single-agent patupilone in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly patupilone, a natural epothilone B, in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with patupilone (0.3 to 3.6 mg/m2) for 6 weeks on/3 weeks off or 3 weeks on/1 week off. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), MTD, and pharmacokinetics were determined for each schedule of administration. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were enrolled. The most common tumor types included ovarian, breast, and colon cancers. Doses of patupilone less than 2.5 mg/m2 using either the 6 weeks on/3 weeks off or the 3 weeks on/1 week off schedule were tolerated well. At higher doses, DLTs were observed using both dosing schedules, with diarrhea the most common DLT. The MTD for both treatment schedules was 2.5 mg/m2. After a short infusion, patupilone blood concentrations declined in a multiphasic manner with a terminal half-life of 4 days. Drug clearance was nonrenal and was not related to body-surface area. Over the dose range evaluated, systemic drug exposure was approximately dose proportional. Three patients achieved a partial response, and 31 patients had stable disease. Two patients experiencing a partial response had received prior taxane therapy. CONCLUSION: Patupilone is well tolerated when administered at a dose of 2.5 mg/m2, using either a 6 weeks on/3 weeks off or a 3 weeks on/1 week off schedule. In contrast with murine studies, patupilone has a relatively prolonged terminal half-life in humans. The partial responses in patients previously treated with taxanes is consistent with promising preclinical results.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of weekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and daily capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine are three active chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action. This phase I study investigated the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of this combination given on a weekly schedule. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Docetaxel and cisplatin were given i.v. over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine was given orally bid on days 1 to 14 (every 21 days). Escalation occurred in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose was defined. Pharmacokinetics studies of docetaxel and total and ultrafiltrate platinum after cisplatin administration were done on cycle 1 (with capecitabine) and cycle 2 (without capecitabine). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Two of six patients at dose level 5 had a dose-limiting infection and diarrhea. One of six evaluable patients at dose level 4 (27 mg/m2 docetaxel, 27 mg/m2 cisplatin, 825 mg/m2 capecitabine) had a dose-limiting hypomagnesemia. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were similar on cycles 1 and 2. Area under the plasma concentrations versus time curves of total platinum was significantly greater in cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P = 0.001). There was no difference in the disposition of docetaxel on cycles 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine dose for phase II studies is 27/27/825 mg/m2. The alteration in total and ultrafiltrate platinum disposition on cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 may be inherent to sequential cisplatin administration; however, prior treatment with capecitabine cannot be ruled out as a factor.     

Phase II study of a short course of weekly high-dose cisplatin combined with long-term oral etoposide in pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase II study with a dose-intensive weekly cisplatinschedule for six cycles, we observed a partial response in 5of 14 patients with pleural mesothelioma. However, responseduration was short (median 6 months). Since oral etoposide maytheoretically be synergis-tic to cisplatin, we performed a phaseII study with the combination of both drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five chemo-naive patients with pleural mesothelioma weretreated with cisplatin 70 mg/m² days 1–8–15 anddays 29–36–43 in combination with oral etoposide50 mg days 1–15 and days 29–43. Patients with stabledisease, or better, continued treatment with oral etoposide50 mg/m²/day days 1–21 every 28 days. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Completeresponse was observed in one patient and partial responses in5 patients (RR% 24%; 95% Cl: 10%–45%) for a median durationof 30 weeks. Twelve patients had stable disease. The responsestatus never improved during maintenance treatment with oraletoposide. Most patients tolerated the regimen very well. Toxicitywas mainly haema-tologic with leukocytopenia causing treatmentdelays in 8 patients. Ototoxicity grade 1 or 2 was observedin 8 patients, neurotoxicity grade 1 in 9 patients and nephrotoxicitygrade 1 in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Frequently administered cisplatin in combination with oral etoposidehas a moderate but definite activity in pleural mesothelioma pleural mesothelioma, cisplatin, oral etoposide, dose-intensity     

Phase I study on docetaxel and ifosfamide in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Docetaxel and ifosfamide have shown significant activity against a variety of solid tumours. This prompted a phase I trial on the combination of these drugs. This phase I study was performed to assess the feasibility of the combination, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the side effects, and to propose a safe schedule for further phase II studies. A total of 34 patients with a histologically confirmed solid tumour, who were not pretreated with taxanes or ifosfamide and who had received no more than one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were entered into the study. Treatment consisted of docetaxel given as a 1-h infusion followed by ifosfamide as a 24-h infusion (schedule A), or ifosfamide followed by docetaxel (schedule B) every 3 weeks. Docetaxel doses ranged from 60 to 85 mg m(-2) and ifosfamide doses from 2.5 to 5.0 g m(-2). Granulocytopenia grade 3 and 4 were common (89%), short lasting and ifosfamide dose dependent. Febrile neutropenia and sepsis occurred in 17% and 2% of courses respectively. Non-haematological toxicities were mild to moderate and included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, mucositis, diarrhoea, sensory neuropathy, skin and nail toxicity and oedema. There did not appear to be any pharmacokinetic interaction between docetaxel and ifosfamide. One complete response (CR) (soft tissue sarcoma) and two partial responses (PRs) were documented. A dose of 75 mg m(-2) of docetaxel combined with 5.0 g m(-2) ifosfamide appeared to be manageable. Schedule A was advocated for further treatment.     

Phase II study of a short course of weekly high-dose cisplatin combined with long-term oral etoposide in metastatic colorectal cancer.

In a phase I study of weekly administered cisplatin combined with oral etoposide, we observed a partial response in 4 out of 11 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Subsequently, we performed a phase II study to investigate the activity of this combination as first-line treatment in this disease. Fourteen patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study. Treatment consisted of cisplatin, administered in 3% sodium chloride, at a dose of 70 mg m-2 on days 1, 8 and 15 and days 29, 36 and 43 combined with oral etoposide 50 mg absolute dose daily on days 1-15 of both courses. Patients with stable disease or better continued treatment with etoposide 50 mg m-2 orally on days 1-21 every 28 days. A partial response was observed in two patients with liver metastases (14%; 95% confidence limits 2-42%) for 30 and 32 weeks. Five patients had stable disease. Toxicity consisted mainly of anaemia, leucocytopenia, nausea and vomiting. Tinnitus was reported by six patients. The activity of the combination cisplatin-oral etoposide in the schedule is only minimal in metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of cisplatin on day 1 and docetaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for the treatment of previously untreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methods A group of 38 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had not received prior treatment and who were aged under 75 years were enrolled. The patients received intravenous infusions of docetaxel (25 mg/m², days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (80 mg/m², day 1), followed by a week of rest.Results Six patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia (18%), but there were no episodes of neutropenic fever. Nonhematologic toxicities were also mild. There were 12 partial responses for an objective response rate of 31.6%. The median survival was 11.8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 46.5%.Conclusion Cisplatin combined with weekly administration of docetaxel is efficacious against NSCLC with low hematotoxicity, and this schedule may be an alternative for the treatment of NSCLC.     

Phase I study of afatinib combined with nintedanib in patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

This Phase I study evaluated continuous- and intermittent-dosing (every other week) of afatinib plus nintedanib in patients with advanced solid tumours.

Methods:

In the dose-escalation phase (n=45), maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) were determined for continuous/intermittent afatinib 10, 20, 30 or 40 mg once daily plus continuous nintedanib 150 or 200 mg twice daily. Secondary objectives included safety and efficacy. Clinical activity of continuous afatinib plus nintedanib at the MTD was further evaluated in an expansion phase (n=25).

Results:

The most frequent dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhoea (11%) and transaminase elevations (7%). Maximum tolerated doses were afatinib 30 mg continuously plus nintedanib 150 mg, and afatinib 40 mg intermittently plus nintedanib 150 mg. Treatment-related adverse events (mostly Grade ⩽3) included diarrhoea (98%), asthenia (64%), nausea (62%) and vomiting (60%). In the dose-escalation phase, two patients had partial responses (PRs) and 27 (60%) had stable disease (SD). In the expansion phase, one complete response and three PRs were observed (all non-small cell lung cancer), with SD in 13 (52%) patients. No pharmacokinetic interactions were observed.

Conclusions:

MTDs of continuous or intermittent afatinib plus nintedanib demonstrated a manageable safety profile with proactive management of diarrhoea. Antitumour activity was observed in patients with solid tumours.     

Phase I study of paclitaxel poliglumex administered weekly for patients with advanced solid malignancies

Background

Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX, also called Xyotax^® or CT-2103) is a water soluble macromolecular drug conjugate that links paclitaxel with a biodegradable polymer, poly-l-glutamic acid. The recommended phase II dose of PPX every 3 week is 235 mg/m² administered over a 10-min infusion without premedication. This study was designed to determine the MTD and pharmacology of PPX administered weekly to patients with solid malignancies.

Methods

The starting dose of weekly PPX was 20 mg/m². Each cycle consists of 6 weekly treatments with pharmacokinetics of PPX (the conjugated paclitaxel) and unconjugated paclitaxel obtained after the first and sixth dose. Three to six patients were enrolled at each dose level. Toxicity and response were assessed by the NCI Common Toxicity criteria version 2 and RECIST criteria, respectively.

Results

Twenty-six patients were treated with PPX at the following dose levels: 20 mg/m² (five patients), 40 mg/m² (four patients), 60 mg/m² (four patients), 70 mg/m² (eight patients) and 80 mg/m² (five patients). Dose-limiting toxicities, consisting of grade 3 neutropenia, occurred in the 80 mg/m² cohort during cycle 1. Therefore, the dose recommended for phase II studies was 70 mg/m². In this cohort, a single dose-limiting event, consisting of diarrhea, was seen. Neuropathy and fatigue were the most common toxicities. No objective responses were noted. Pharmacokinetics was dose-proportional, and the degree of neutropenia related to drug exposure, but not to peak plasma concentration. There was no significant accumulation of conjugated or unconjugated paclitaxel with this dosing schedule.

Conclusions

The recommended dose of PPX for subsequent disease-directed studies is 70 mg/m² weekly.     

Phase I study of pazopanib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose.

To evaluate the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR), dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib, an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit, in combination with paclitaxel.

Patients and Methods.

Pazopanib was given daily with weekly paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Dose levels of pazopanib (mg/day)/paclitaxel (mg/m²) were 400/15, 800/15, 800/50, and 800/80. An expanded cohort was enrolled at the MTR. Plasma samples were collected to evaluate the effect of pazopanib, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, a CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 substrate.

Results.

Of 26 enrolled patients, 17 were treated at the MTR of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m² paclitaxel. Dose-limiting toxicities included a grade 3 abscess and grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia. Other toxicities included elevated liver transaminases and diarrhea. Six patients (23%) had partial responses and 15 patients (58%) had stable disease. Administration of 800 mg pazopanib resulted in a 14% lower paclitaxel clearance and a 31% higher paclitaxel maximal concentration than with administration of paclitaxel alone at 15, 50, and 80 mg/m². At the MTR, coadministration of 800 mg pazopanib and 80 mg/m² paclitaxel resulted in a 26% higher geometric mean paclitaxel area under the curve.

Conclusion.

Pazopanib, at a dose of 800 mg daily, can be safely combined with a therapeutic dose of paclitaxel at 80 mg/m² when administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 28 days. The observed greater plasma concentrations of paclitaxel given concurrently with pazopanib suggest that pazopanib is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8.     

Phase I study of weekly docetaxel and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the weekly administration of docetaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PEG-LD) in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with solid tumors were enrolled in the study. Dose escalations of both drugs were given on a weekly basis for 3 consecutive weeks in cycles of 4 weeks. The starting dose for docetaxel was 20 mg/m(2)/week and for PEG-LD 6 mg/m(2)/week. RESULTS: The MTD was 35 mg/m(2)/week for docetaxel and 14 mg/m(2)/week for PEG-LD. The DLTs at this level were grade 3 diarrhea (n=1 patient) and grade 3 mucositis (n=2 patients). There was no grade 4 hematologic or non-hematologic toxicity. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred only in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. The non-hematologic toxicity was also mild with grade 2/3 fatigue in 8 patients, grade 2/3 neurotoxicity in 4, grade 2/3 mucositis in 8, grade 2/3 diarrhea in 4 and grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting in 5 patients. Two (5.7%) complete and 6 (17%) partial responses (overall response rate=22.7%; 95% confidence interval 9.6--32.4%) were observed among 35 evaluable patients. In 12 (63%) of 19 patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, a decline in serum levels of prostate-specific antigen of >50% was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The weekly administration of docetaxel with PEG-LD is a well-tolerated regimen that merits further evaluation.     

Phase I study of temsirolimus in combination with cetuximab in patients with advanced solid tumours

BackgroundPreclinical studies suggest synergistic antitumour effects of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor such as temsirolimus combined with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody such as cetuximab.MethodsTemsirolimus (T) and cetuximab (C) were combined and escalated in cohorts of patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours, respectively from 15 to 25 mg and 150–250 mg/m², until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. Effort was made in the expansion cohort to enrol patients harbouring a molecular aberration in the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and/or phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways. Paired biopsies were optional to evaluate pathway modulation.ResultsAmong 39 patients enrolled, three experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): pulmonary embolism (C200 + T20), stomatitis (C250 + T20) and acneiform rash (C250 + T25). The weekly C 250 mg/m² and T 25 mg dose level was selected as the MTD. The most common treatment-related adverse events were: acneiform rash (97%), oral mucositis (82%), fatigue (59%), nausea (41%) and diarrhoea (36%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were respectively 2.0 months [95% CI: 1.8, 3.5] and 7.5 months [95% CI: 5.5, 11.9]. Among all patients, partial responses (PRs) and stable diseases (SDs) were observed in 2 (5.1%) and 18 patients (46.2%), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) in patients with a molecular aberration was 2/14 (14%), versus 0/24 in those without molecular aberration.ConclusionsCombination of T + C showed significant but manageable toxicities. Due to modest clinical activity, further evaluation is not recommended. Molecular selection could potentially increase the objective response rate and should be implemented during drug development.     

Phase I study of TAS-102 treatment in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

TAS-102 consists of α, α, α-trifluorothymidine (TFT) and an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase (TPI). We conducted a dose-escalation phase I study in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours.

Methods:

TAS-102 was administered twice daily on days 1–5 and days 8–12 in a 28-day cycle to patients with solid tumours refractory to standard chemotherapy, to determine its maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetics (PKs). MTD was evaluated in cycle 1.

Results:

Safety and PKs were evaluated in 21 patients treated with TAS-102 at 30, 40, 50, 60, or 70 mg m⁻² per day. DLTs, such as grade 4 leucopenia, grade 4 neutropenia, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia, were observed in two patients at doses of 30 and 70 mg m⁻². α, α, α-trifluorothymidine and TPI exposures increased dose dependently, and the percentage of decrease in neutrophil count and TFT exposure were significantly correlated. The disease control rate was 50.0% with a median progression-free survival of 2.4 months in 18 colorectal cancer patients. The dose of TAS-102 was not increased above 70 mg m⁻² per day because of the increased tendency for grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, and 70 mg m⁻² per day was the recommended dose for phase II studies.

Conclusions:

TAS-102 at 70 mg m⁻² per day was tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours. Phase II studies are ongoing in patients with colorectal cancer.     

Phase I trial outcomes in older patients with advanced solid tumours

Background:

This study had two aims: (a) to test the hypothesis that advanced age is associated with lower levels of tolerability and clinical benefit to experimental Phase I trial agents; (b) to assess the validity of the Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score as a patient selection tool in older patients.

Methods:

Clinico-pathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of all patients treated consecutively from 2005 to 2009 in phase I trials at the RMH were recorded. All toxicity and clinical outcome data were compared between patients aged below and above 65 years of age.

Results:

One thousand and four patients were treated in 30 Phase I trials, with 315 (31%) patients aged 65 years and older. Grade 3–5 toxicities (22.8% vs 24.8% (P=0.52)), trial discontinuation (6% vs 4% P=0.33), and dose interruptions (8.0% vs 8.0% (P=0.96)) were observed at similar rates in patients below and above 65 years of age, respectively. The overall response rate 5.2% vs 4.1%, progression-free survival (PFS) 1.9 vs 3.5 months and clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months 15.2% vs 14.3% were comparable in both groups. To avoid bias due to the potential therapeutic benefit of abiraterone, comparisons were repeated excluding prostate cancer patients with similar results (ORR 4.6% vs 4%, PFS 1.8 vs 3.0 months, CBR at 6 months 13.5% vs 9.5%). Multivariate analysis indicated that the previously identified RMH score (including albumin and lactate dehydrogenase levels) was an accurate predictor of outcome.

Conclusions:

Phase I clinical trials should be considered in patients with advanced cancers regardless of age, as older patients who enter these have similar safety and efficacy outcomes as their younger counterparts. The RMH prognostic score can assist in the selection of suitable older patients.     

Cabazitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours: Results of a Phase I and pharmacokinetic study

BackgroundAlthough the taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel are among the most active agents for the treatment of a wide range of cancers, tumours often develop resistance to these treatments. Cabazitaxel is a novel taxane active in both preclinical models of chemotherapy-sensitive and -resistant human tumours and patients with advanced prostate cancer that progressed following docetaxel treatment.AimTo establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cabazitaxel.Patients and methodsCabazitaxel was administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumours. The design allowed intrapatient dose escalation. The primary objective was to determine the MTD. Secondary objectives were to describe the safety profile, establish an appropriate dose, determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of cabazitaxel, and assess antitumour activity.ResultsTwenty-one patients were recruited. The MTD was reached at 30 mg/m², at which three of five patients experienced haematologic DLTs during the first cycle. DLTs during subsequent cycles were mainly haematologic and reported at 25 and 30 mg/m² dosing levels. Nail disorders and severe alopecia were not reported, and neurotoxicity, fluid retention and hypersensitivity were mild and infrequent. Cabazitaxel demonstrated linear PK, a triphasic elimination profile, with a long half-life and high clearance. Of the 19 patients evaluable for response, one unconfirmed partial response and six occurrences of stable disease were reported.ConclusionsThe 25 mg/m² dose of cabazitaxel was recommended for use in future clinical studies. In this study, cabazitaxel had an acceptable tolerability profile and activity in cervical, colorectal, endometrial and lung cancers.