Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in preterm neonates: evaluation of a once-daily dosage regimen.

Population pharmacokinetic parameters of gentamicin in preterm neonates on a once-daily dosage regimen of 3.0 mg/kg given intravenously every 24 hours were established prospectively. In 34 preterm neonates with a mean gestational age of 32 +/- 4 (SD), 182 serum gentamicin levels (91 peak/trough pairs) were determined. Individual adjustments of dose or dosage interval were calculated by computer-aided Bayesian forecasting. The parameters Vd, ke, and CL for each patient were obtained by the nonparametric estimation of maximization method. The predictive power of the model was calculated and the pharmacokinetic estimates were statistically analyzed with SPSS/PC. Cluster analysis showed a division into 2 subpopulations (designated 1 and 2) on the basis of postnatal age. The mean +/- SD postnatal age of subpopulation 1 (n = 29) was 6 +/- 2 days (range 1-7) and of subpopulation 2 (n = 5) 15 +/- 4 days (range 12-24). The mean +/- SD gentamicin relative clearances of subpopulation 1 and subpopulation 2 were 0.0515 +/- 0.0128 and 0.1026 +/- 0.0102 L kg(-1) hr(-1), respectively (p < 0.05). The mean +/- SD values for Vd (Lkg(-1)) in both populations 1 and 2 were 0.6916 +/- 0.1670 and 0.7509 +/- 0.1961, respectively (not significantly different). For ke these data were 0.0744 +/- 0.0200 and 0.1366 +/- 0.0522 (p < 0.05). Statistics showed that the data for Vd and ke of subpopulation 1 were normally distributed (Vd and ke skewness 1.61 and 1.46; kurtosis 3.09 and 3.10 respectively). The model yielded a bias of -0.11 mg/L and a precision of 0.36 mg/L. It is recommended that gentamicin be started in a dosage of 3.5 mg/kg intravenously once-daily under close monitoring.     

Population pharmacokinetics and relationship between demographic and clinical variables and pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in neonates

Population pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were calculated from 725 routine plasma gentamicin concentrations obtained in 177 neonates of 24 to 42 weeks' gestational age in their first week of life. Kel increases and V/W decreases with increasing gestational age. Almost identical results were obtained with iterative two-stage Bayesian fitting (MW\PHARM 3.30) as with a non-parametric maximization algorithm (NPEM2). The effect of various covariates on drug disposition was investigated retrospectively using multiple regression analysis. Predictive power for Kel increases with rising gestational age. For neonates 28.5 weeks and 30.9 weeks (r2 = 0.482), with gestational age, postnatal age, and Apgar score at 5 minutes being predictors. A very strong correlation existed between volume of distribution and weight (r2 = 0.83). Volume as a function of weight could be described with low predictivity by gestational age and to a lesser degree by Apgar score at 5 minutes (r2 = 0.298). The developed models need appropriate prospective clinical validation.     

Population kinetics of gentamicin in neonates

A population kinetic analysis was carried out on sparse plasma gentamicin (GE) concentration data from 469 neonates obtained as part of a routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) programme in the hospital neonatology unit.The best predictors of the kinetic parameters of the monoexponential model, volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (CL), were the weight (WT) and gestational age (GA). Vd of the neonates was only related to WT, whereas the half-life was only related to the GA.     

Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in premature infants.

The population kinetics of gentamicin were studied in 97 newborn patients with a gestational age ranging between 28 and 43 weeks and a postnatal age ranging between 2 and 30 days undergoing routine therapeutic monitoring of their serum gentamicin levels. The individual kinetic analysis of serum drug levels was performed using a single-compartment model. The clearance and apparent distribution volume were calculated in each patient. The population model employed assumes the existence of residual variability in the serum concentrations and interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters. The effects of demographic variables on the clearance, distribution volume, and optimum daily dose of gentamicin were established using multiple linear regression. Gestational age is the best predictive variable of the clearance and the optimum dose/day in the whole population studied. In the premature infant patients, the predictive capacity increases with postconceptional age. Weight is a good predictive variable of all of the parameters, especially of the apparent distribution volume in the overall population of newborns. Analysis of the population kinetic behavior and optimum dose/day in each subgroup recommends that the interval of drug administration should be increased, keeping the same dose/day ratio, due to the tendency of the drug to accumulate its long half-life, especially in premature babies.     

Population pharmacokinetics of cisapride in neonates

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a population pharmacokinetic analysis of cisapride in neonates to study whether metabolic immaturity in this population may lead to increased concentrations. METHODS: Cisapride was administered orally in 91 neonates at the dose of 0.2 mg/kg four times a day. Plasma concentrations were measured using a validated HPLC method. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption was fitted to the data using NONMEM software. RESULTS: One to seven plasma samples were obtained from neonates aged 7-123 days. Cisapride concentrations ranged from 5.5 ng/mL to 172 ng/mL and were not higher than those reported in adults. The absorption constant rate was fixed to 2.5 h-1. Clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) both significantly correlated to weight (WT), but addition of this covariate in V/F did not improve the objective function after it was added in the CL/F covariate model. Prematurity, postnatal age, or coadministered drugs did not affect cisapride clearance. Final population pharmacokinetic parameters (interindividual variability) were: V/F=17,200 mL (90.4%) and CL/F=3.91 x WT(3/4) mL/h (36.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that cisapride clearance is primarily influenced by weight is in agreement with current recommendations of weight-adjusted doses. This study indicates that no clinically relevant maturational changes in cisapride clearance have to be considered during the first quadrimester of life.     

Effect of body weight on gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates

The pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in large-for-gestational-age (LGA) and appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) newborn infants were compared in a prospective study. Serum gentamicin concentrations were drawn just before (trough) or after (peak) the third or fourth dose of gentamicin sulfate 2.5 mg/kg given as a 30-minute i.v. infusion every 12 hours to 11 LGA and 12 AGA infants. Peak (Cmax) and trough ( Cmin ) serum concentrations, elimination rate constants (k), volumes of distribution (V), and clearances (CL) were compared between the AGA and LGA groups and within the LGA group between obese (n = 6) and nonobese (n = 5) infants. The serum gentamicin concentrations achieved in the LGA infants were similar to those in the AGA infants, with Cmin values less than 2 micrograms/ml and Cmax values of 4-7 micrograms/ml. The mean pharmacokinetic variables determined were consistent with literature values reported for AGA infants. No significant differences in these variables were observed between the two groups or within the LGA group. Greater variability in Cmax, V, and CL was observed in the LGA group as a whole. The initial dose of gentamicin now recommended for AGA infants should be appropriate for LGA infants. However, serum concentrations should be monitored carefully to detect interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics so that adjustments can be made to ensure therapeutic serum concentrations.     

The effect of sepsis upon gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates

AIM: To investigate the effect of sepsis upon the volume of distribution (Vd) of gentamicin in neonates. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of neonates admitted to Dunedin Hospital who had gentamicin concentrations performed between 1st January 2000 and 30th October 2003. Data from 277 neonates, including a total of 576 gentamicin concentrations, were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Fifteen (5.4%) of the neonates had confirmed sepsis. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed with NONMEM using a one compartment first order elimination model. Duration of infusion (D) was included as a parameter in the model. Covariates included sepsis (SEP), chronological age, gestational age (GA), birth weight, current weight, gender, Apgar score at 1 (AP1) and 5 (AP2) minutes, plasma C-reactive protein and serum creatinine. RESULTS: The initial model provided a mean estimates of clearance (CL) of 0.0460 l kg(-1) h(-1), volume of distribution (Vd) of 0.483 l kg(-1) and D of 0.748 h. The magnitudes of interpatient variability, expressed as CV%, were 29.2% for CL, 20.8% for Vd and 71.5% for D. The magnitude of residual variability in gentamicin concentrations was 88.0%. The final pharmacokinetic model was: CL = (0.0177 + 0.00147.(GA-20) + 0.000635.AP2) l kg(-1) h(-1), Vd = (0.483 +0.0656. sepsis) l kg(-1), D = 0.672 h. The interpatient variability (CV%) was 22.8% for CL, 22.8% for Vd and 97.7% for D. The magnitude of residual variability in gentamicin concentrations was 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The 14% increase in Vd in septic neonates implies that larger doses may be required to achieve peak therapeutic concentrations in the presence of sepsis. D is an important parameter in neonatal pharmacokinetic models.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics in optimal gentamicin dosing regimen in neonates

Gentamicin is readily used for suspected or proven sepsis in neonates, yet it shows considerable inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability, which limits achievements of therapeutic levels. Hence, the aim of this study was to compare peak and trough gentamicin concentrations according to dosing regimen, to evaluate pharmacokinetic parameters, and to consider adjustments of dosing regimen. Babies with infection were treated with 1 h infusion, and daily dose of 5 or 7.5 mg/kg depending on the age. Patients were randomized into two groups: I — dosing interval 12 h (n=8), II — 24 h (n=11). Two steady-state blood samples were obtained. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using one-compartment model. The results showed a difference (p<0.05) in peak gentamicin concentrations between the groups, and tendency of lower trough levels in the group II. Calculated pharmacokinetic parameters included the volume of distribution (Vd) 0.52±0.47 l/kg, clearance (CL) 0.055±0.036 l/hkg and a half-life (t_1/2) of 6.89±3.21 h. Based on the method for dosing regimen adjustments, there was a need to extend dosing interval to 36 h in 6 patients     

通过非线性混合效应模型法建立多西他赛的群体药动学模型

目的 建立多西他赛在肿瘤患者中的群体药动学(PPK)模型,考察固定效应因素对多西他赛清除率的影响.方法 以接受多西他赛静脉滴注的肿瘤患者为研究对象,回顾性分析80例患者服药后的210个多西他赛的稳态血药浓度及相应的实验室指标检测数据,多西他赛的血药浓度采用高效液相色谱法测定,应用非线性混合效应模型(NONMEM)软件进行PPK数据分析,Bootstrap重复抽样用于模型的内部验证.结果 建立最终模型方程为:CL'=θ1×(BSA/1.58)02×(ALB/3.6)θ3× HEP,患者体表面积、白蛋白和肝功能对多西他赛的清除率影响显著.结论 利用NONMEM软件建立针对肿瘤患者的多西他赛PPK模型,并结合患者体表面积、白蛋白和肝功能可估算其清除率,为临床个体化用药方案的优化提供参考.     

Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in South African newborns

Objective Gentamicin population pharmacokinetics in newborns were studied with special reference to possible gender effects.Methods Steady-state serum levels (n=139) were obtained from 79 neonates with a mean birth weight of 2.1 kg, mean gestational age of 35.1 weeks and mean age at the time of sampling of 4.2 days. The data were analysed using the non-linear mixed effects model (NONMEM). A one-compartment model was used to fit the data.Results The final models for clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) were: CL(l/h)=0.001×WGT×GA×P and V(l)=0.472×WGT, where WGT=birth weight (kg), GA=gestational age (weeks) and P=1.2 for girls and 1.0 for boys. The values of inter-individual variability in CL and V were 34% and 35%, respectively. Intra-individual variability was 5% (proportional) and 7.2% (additive). Mean (95% confidence interval) values of CL and half-life were 0.042 l h^–1 kg^–1 (0.041, 0.043 l h^–1 kg^–1) and 8.0 h (7.7, 8.3 h), while V was 0.472 (0.428, 0.516) l/kg for all patients.Conclusion Mean population pharmacokinetic values were similar to those obtained with NONMEM for gentamicin in other neonates of similar age. Gender was found to be a determinant of CL, with girls clearing faster than boys.     

Population pharmacokinetics of rectal theophylline in neonates

The population pharmacokinetics of theophylline were studied in 35 neonates receiving aminophylline suppositories for the treatment of apnoea of prematurity. Routinely measured theophylline serum concentrations (n = 138, range 3-20 mg/L) were modelled in NONMEM according to a one-compartment model. The influence of a number of clinical and demographic factors, e.g., weight (range 0.8-2.5 kg) and postnatal age (2-80 days), on clearance/bioavailability (CL/F) and volume/bioavailability (V/F) was investigated. Both these parameters were found to significantly correlate to weight alone in a directly proportional manner: CL/F = 40 +/- 2 ml/h/kg and V/F = 1.3 +/- 0.2 L/kg. The absorption was best described by a first-order process, having a half-life of 1.6 +/- 0.7 h. The interindividual variability in CL/F was 25%, whereas the same estimates in V/F and in the first-order absorption rate constant could not be obtained. The residual variability in theophylline concentrations was modelled with additive error with an estimated standard deviation of 1.78 mg/L. From these results, it was concluded that rectal administration of aminophylline in neonates is a therapeutically acceptable alternative to oral administration. The convenience gained by rectal, compared to oral, administrations may compensate, in many instances, for the possibly slightly higher variability in CL/F of the former.     

Population pharmacokinetics of caffeine in premature neonates

Objective: To determine population pharmacokinetic parameters of caffeine in premature neonates. Methods: This population analysis was done using 145 serum concentration measurements gathered from 75 hospitalized patients during their routine clinical care. The data were analysed by use of NONMEM (mixed effects modelling) according to a one-compartment open model with either zero or first-order absorption and first-order elimination. The effect of a variety of developmental, demographic and clinical factors (gender, birth weight, current weight, gestational age, postnatal age, postconceptional age and concurrent treatment with phenobarbital and parenteral nutrition) on clearance and volume of distribution was investigated. Forward selection and backward elimination regression identified significant covariates. Results: The final pharmacostatistical model with influential covariates were as follows: clearance (ml · h⁻¹) =5.81 · current weight (kg) + 1.22 · postnatal age (weeks), multiplied by 0.757 if gestational age ≤ 28 weeks and 0.836 if the current primary source of patients' nutrition is parenteral nutrition, and volume of distribution (ml) = 911 · current weight (kg). The interindividual variability in clearance and the residual variability, expressed as coefficients of variation, were 14.87% and 18.44%, respectively. Due to the lack of information on the data set we were unable to characterize the interindividual variability for volume of distribution. Conclusion: In this study, which involved on average only two serum concentrations of caffeine per patient, the use of NONMEM gave us significant and consistent information about the pharmacokinetic profile of caffeine when compared with available bibliographic information. Additionally, parenteral nutrition and low gestational age (≤ 28 weeks) may even come to be considered as risk factors, and their presence may serve as an indicator of the need for periodic monitoring of caffeine concentrations in premature infants. Received: 27 July 1996 / Accepted in revised form: 26 November 1996     

The effect of postnatal age on gentamicin pharmacokinetics in neonates

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if gentamicin serum concentrations obtained from newborns on day 2 of life versus days 3-4 yield significantly different pharmacokinetic parameter values. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Two hundred and sixty-seven infants who had peak and trough gentamicin serum concentrations determined on days 2, 3, or 4 of life. INTERVENTION: Determination of peak and trough serum gentamicin concentrations on days 2, 3, or 4 of life. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The elimination rate constant, serum half-life, volume of distribution, and clearance of gentamicin were calculated using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Gestational age, birthweight, gentamicin dosage, peak and trough gentamicin concentrations, and hours after birth at which serum concentrations were drawn were recorded for all infants. Infants were stratified into three groups based on gestational age: 28 weeks or younger, older than 28 weeks but younger than 37 weeks, and 37 weeks or older. Birthweight and calculated pharmacokinetic parameters were compared by 2-tailed Student t test to determine if significant differences existed between pharmacokinetics parameters determined on day 2 of life versus days 3 or 4 within each of the gestational age groups. These analyses revealed only one significant difference between parameters assessed on day 2 versus days 3 or 4: at day 2, the mean trough concentration of gentamicin in infants of gestational age between 28 and 37 weeks was 1.63 +/- 0.44 mg/L, whereas at days 3 or 4, the same parameter for patients of the same gestational age was 1.4 +/- 0.48 mg/L (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: With one exception--elevated trough concentrations in infants in the gestational age group between 28 and 37 weeks--pharmacokinetic parameters calculated using gentamicin serum concentrations determined on day 2 of life are not significantly different from those derived from gentamicin serum concentrations determined on days 3 or 4. This suggests that gentamicin serum concentrations and subsequent dosage adjustments can be determined on day 2 of life.     

Population pharmacokinetics of domperidone in preterm neonates

Purpose  A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed to define domperidone pharmacokinetic parameters in preterm neonates, as no pharmacokinetic data are available in this population. Methods  An oral domperidone solution was administered (0.75 mg/kg per day) in 32 preterm neonates (64 samples). Domperidone plasma concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay, and a one-compartment model with first-order absorption was fitted to the data using NONMEM version V level 1.1. Results  The mean peak and trough plasma concentration values of domperidone were, respectively, 25.3 ± 20.5 ng/ml and 15.4 ± 11.4 ng/ml (mean ± standard deviation). The pharmacokinetic parameters (interindividual variability%) were clearance (Cl/F) = 0.92 L/h (51.6%), volume of distribution (Vd/F) = 0.405 L (68%), and absorption constant rate (Ka) = 0.0843 h⁻¹ (55.8%). The clearance is not lower than values reported in adults. No influence of covariates (postnatal age, prematurity, weight, gender) on domperidone pharmacokinetic parameters was found. Conclusion  This pilot study designed with a limited sampling strategy showed that domperidone plasma concentrations were consistent with those reported in adults, suggesting that domperidone dosage regimen currently used in preterm neonates is suitable.     

Population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in hospitalized patients receiving once-daily dosing

The purpose of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in a group of 939 adult hospitalized patients receiving once-daily administration of gentamicin and to evaluate the potential influence of patient covariates on gentamicin disposition. Data comprising 1294 serum concentrations from 939 patients, were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effect model (NONMEM). The patients had an average age of 55 and an average weight of 70 kg, 431 of the patients were female. The patient covariates including body weight, gender, age, and creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) were analyzed in a stepwise fashion to identify their potential influences on gentamicin pharmacokinetics. The data were best described with a two-compartment model. NONMEM analyses showed that gentamicin clearance (CL, l/h) was linearly correlated with CLcR with proportionality constant: 0.047 (S.E.: 0.0035) x CL(CR) (ml/min). Volume of the central compartment (V1, 1) was linearly related to body weight with proportionality constant: 0.28 (S.E.: 0.021) x body weight (kg). The mean population estimates of CL and V1 were 4.32 l/h and 19.61. respectively. The inter-individual variability in CL and V1 were 29.6 and 5.8%, respectively. Residual errors were 0.23 mg/l and 23.7%. The mean population values of CL and V1 of gentamicin dosed once daily are in agreement with those described by others. This analysis indicates that once-daily dosing (7 mg/kg) of gentamicin should achieve satisfactory concentration in patients with normal renal function although serum concentration monitoring is required to confirm the optimal dosing interval in patients with impaired renal function.     

Population pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers in very premature neonates

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters for both S- and R-ibuprofen enantiomers in very premature neonates (gestational age strictly inferior to 28 weeks) and possible relationships between the pharmacokinetic parameters and various covariates. Newborns were randomized to receive ibuprofen or placebo for the prophylactic treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) at an initial dose of 10 mg/kg ibuprofen within 6 hours after birth, followed by two 5-mg/kg doses at 24-hour intervals (n = 52). If a PDA was still present afterwards, a curative course of ibuprofen using the same dosage regimen was administered (n = 10). A sparse sampling strategy was used because only 2 samples were collected after the third prophylactic injection and 1 after the third curative injection. A model including the chiral transformation of R- to S-ibuprofen was fitted to the concentration-time data using a population approach (NONMEM). R- and S-ibuprofen t(1/2) were about 10 hours and 25.5 hours, respectively. After prophylactic treatment, the mean clearance of R-ibuprofen (CLR = 12.7 mL/h) was about 2.5-fold higher than for S-ibuprofen (CLS = 5.0 mL/h). In addition, clearance of R- and S-ibuprofen increased significantly with gestational age. The mean estimation of R-ibuprofen clearance was found to be higher than for S-ibuprofen, and the clearance of both enantiomers increased with gestational age. This should be considered to assess pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of ibuprofen in premature neonates and subsequently to understand and refine the use of ibuprofen in managing PDA either as a prophylactic or curative treatment.     

Population pharmacokinetic study of gentamicin in a large cohort of premature and term neonates

AimThis study aims to investigate the clinical and demographic factors influencing gentamicin pharmacokinetics in a large cohort of unselected premature and term newborns and to evaluate optimal regimens in this population.MethodsAll gentamicin concentration data, along with clinical and demographic characteristics, were retrieved from medical charts in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit over 5 years within the frame of a routine therapeutic drug monitoring programme. Data were described using non-linear mixed-effects regression analysis ( nonmem®).ResultsA total of 3039 gentamicin concentrations collected in 994 preterm and 455 term newborns were included in the analysis. A two compartment model best characterized gentamicin disposition. The average parameter estimates, for a median body weight of 2170 g, were clearance (CL) 0.089 l h⁻¹ (CV 28%), central volume of distribution (V_c) 0.908 l (CV 18%), intercompartmental clearance (Q) 0.157 l h⁻¹ and peripheral volume of distribution (V_p) 0.560 l. Body weight, gestational age and post-natal age positively influenced CL. Dopamine co-administration had a significant negative effect on CL, whereas the influence of indomethacin and furosemide was not significant. Both body weight and gestational age significantly influenced V_c. Model-based simulations confirmed that, compared with term neonates, preterm infants need higher doses, superior to 4 mg kg⁻¹, at extended intervals to achieve adequate concentrations.ConclusionsThis observational study conducted in a large cohort of newborns confirms the importance of body weight and gestational age for dosage adjustment. The model will serve to set up dosing recommendations and elaborate a Bayesian tool for dosage individualization based on concentration monitoring.