Effect of three months’ treatment with irbesartan on blood and pulse pressure of hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients: open,observational study in 31 793 patients

ABSTRACT

Objectives: In hypertensive diabetics the cardiovascular risk is substantially increased. Therefore, an effective reduction of both blood pressure and pulse pressure is of particular importance for these patients. The aim of the prospective observational study in hypertensive type 2 diabetics was to assess the effect of a switch from the previous antihypertensive therapy to the angiotensin-II-receptor antagonist irbesartan (alone or in combination with HCTZ) on the reduction of blood pressure and pulse pressure, the reduction of diabetic nephropathy (microalbuminuria), and tolerability.

Methods: 8714 general practitioners included 31?793 type 2 diabetics aged at least 18 years in an open observational study. After inclusion in to the study the patients received irbesartan 300?mg as monotherapy or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5?mg (HCTZ). Main outcome measures for efficacy were the reduction of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, reduction of pulse pressure, and blood pressure responder (reduction in DBP ≥ 10 mmHg or diastolic < 90 mmHg), diastolic normalization (DBP < 90 mmHg) and overall normalization rates (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg) after 3 months. Further outcome measures included the reduction of microalbuminuria or proteinuria, and adverse events (AEs) as a measure of tolerability.

Results: Thirty-eight per cent of patients received irbesartan 300?mg and 61% irbesartan in combination with HCTZ. Mean systolic blood pressure was reduced by 22.5?mmHg, diastolic blood pressure by 10.7?mmHg (baseline values: 160.2 and 93.2?mmHg). Pulse pressure fell on average by 11.6?mmHg. 83.4% of the patients were responders, with an overall normalization rate of 42.7% (SBP < 140?mmHg and DBP < 90?mmHg), respectively 73.8% (DBP < 90?mmHg). The antihypertensive benefit was achieved irrespective of the previous medication. Mean albuminuria decreased by about 27.7?mg/L. Only 0.3% of patients experienced adverse events.

Conclusions: In type 2 diabetics with hypertension and either uncontrolled or no previous antihypertensive therapy a change to treatment with irbesartan or irbesartan/HCTZ for 3 months resulted in a distinct reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, with concomitant effective reductions of pulse pressure and microalbuminuria.     

Efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine in patients with poorly controlled mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide (CC/HCTZ), 12.5 mg was compared with that of amlodipine, in a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension inadequately controlled by monotherapy. After a two week run-in period on existing therapy, patients with a sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90-110 mmHg and a sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) 相似文献   

Evaluation of long-term efficacy and acceptability of indapamide SR in elderly hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term antihypertensive efficacy and acceptability of indapamide SR 1.5 mg in elderly hypertensive patients (> or = 65 years). STUDY DESIGN: Open, 12-month, follow-up study of 444 patients, treated with indapamide SR, who were responders and/or achieved target BP levels following a 3-month, randomised, controlled, double-blind short-term comparison of indapamide SR versus hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg and amlodipine 5 mg. RESULTS: The long-term decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) after 12 months follow-up with indapamide SR was -24.0/-13.1 mmHg from baseline (M0). The percentage of patients that achieved target BP levels (DBP < 95 mmHg, SBP < or = 160 mmHg) was 80.1% [84.3% for isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) subgroup], and the response rate (BP < 140/90 mmHg or decrease in supine diastolic BP > or = 10 mmHg or in supine systolic BP > or = 20 mmHg) 81.5%. Blood pressure (BP) remained stable throughout the 12 months follow-up period (M3-M15), whatever the previous treatment received during the 3-month, doubleblind period (M0-M3). Clinical and biological acceptability was good. A low occurrence of withdrawals (7.2%), was reported. CONCLUSION: Over the course of the long-term, 12-month follow-up study, indapamide SR was shown to be an effective and well tolerated antihypertensive therapy, even after a switch from amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide, in patients aged 65 years-80 years with systolo-diastolic hypertension (SDH) or ISH.     

Safety and antihypertensive efficacy of carvedilol and atenolol alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide

Carvedilol has been shown to be effective and safe in patients with essential hypertension when given as monotherapy. In this double-blind, randomized, group-comparative study, 2 groups of 59 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension [median supine systolic/diastolic blood pressure at baseline (SBP/DBP), 168/105 mm Hg] were treated with either 25 mg carvedilol once daily (o. d.) or 50 mg atenolol o. d. for 4 weeks. Responders at 4 weeks (DBP, < 90=" mmhg)=" terminated=" the=" study.=" nonresponders=" continued=" the=" study.=" hydrochlorothiazide=" (hctz)=" was=" added=" at=" 25=" mg=" o.=" d.=" for=" a=" further=" 6=" weeks.=" the=" median=" blood=" pressure=" decreased=" under=" monotherapy=" with=" carvedilol=">n = 59) from 167/105 at baseline to 155/94 mmHg after 4 weeks, and in the atenolol group (n=59) it decreased from 168/105 to 162/97 mmHg. The patients who received carvedilol in combination with HCTZ and were evaluated for efficacy (n = 38) showed a decrease in SBP/DBP from 156/97 at the end of monotherapy to 145/88 mmHg after 10 weeks; the combination of atenolol with HCTZ (n = 44) reduced BP from 162/97 to 147/88. Both carvedilol and atenolol were safe when given either alone or in combination with HCTZ. In conclusion, after long-term administration, 25 mg carvedilol o. d. and 50 mg atenolol o. d. significantly reduced both SBP and DBP over 24 h. The addition of HCTZ led to a further increase in antihypertensive efficacy. Combined treatment with carvedilol or atenolol and HCTZ was very well tolerated, without hypotensive events or relevant changes in objective safety parameters.     

Comparison of monotherapy with irbesartan 150 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.

OBJECTIVE. The primary objective of this study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan 150 mg and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine 5 mg in the treatment of patients with seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-110 mmHg. DESIGN. Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, comparative pilot study. METHODS. Subjects were 18-65 years of age, with DBP 95-110 mmHg, and of non-African American origin. Following a three week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, 181 subjects were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-daily irbesartan 150 mg (n=89) or amlodipine 5 mg (n=92) for four weeks. Trough (24+/-3 hours post-dosing) BP measurements were obtained at baseline and at Weeks 2 and 4 under standardised, controlled conditions. Response was defined as DBP <90 mmHg or a reduction from baseline of 10 mmHg. RESULTS. After four weeks of treatment, the mean (+/-SE) decrease from baseline in DBP was 9.4+/-0.6 mmHg in the irbesartan group vs. 9.6+/-0.6 mmHg in the amlodipine group (p=0.806). The mean decrease from baseline in seated systolic BP was 12.2+/-1.0 mmHg in the irbesartan group vs. 12.0+/-1.0 mmHg in the amlodipine group (p=0.885). Overall, 62% of subjects in the irbesartan group and 63% in the amlodipine group had a response (p=0.609), and 54% and 56% of patients (p=0.596), respectively, had their DBP normalised (<90 mmHg). Adverse events were reported by 21.3% of patients receiving irbesartan and 20.7% receiving amlodipine. Conclusions. Irbesartan 150 mg demonstrated comparable efficacy to amlodipine 5 mg, thereby confirming its value as an antihypertensive treatment option in non-African American patients with DBP 95-110 mmHg.     

A double-blind,randomized study evaluating losartan potassium monotherapy or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide versus placebo in obese patients with hypertension

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of losartan ± hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus placebo in obese patients with systolic and diastolic hypertension.

Research design and methods: Randomized patients (n = 261) were non-diabetic with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 140 and ≤ 180?mmHg and diastolic BP (DBP) ≥ 95 and ≤ 115?mmHg, body mass index > 30?kg/m², and waist circumference > 40 (males)/> 35 (females)?inches. Patients were randomized to placebo or a forced titration of losartan 50?mg titrated at 4-week intervals to losartan 100?mg, losartan 100?mg/HCTZ 12.5?mg, and losartan 100?mg/HCTZ 25?mg. Primary efficacy measurements were change from baseline in SBP and DBP at 12 weeks. Secondary measurements were change from baseline in BPs at 8 and 16 weeks, percent responders at 12 and 16 weeks, and safety/tolerability. Post-hoc analyses were BP at 4 weeks and achieve­ment of controlled BP (SBP < 140 and/or DBP < 90?mmHg) at 12 and 16 weeks.

Results: Losartan 50?mg reduced BP from 151.6/99.2?mmHg at baseline to 140.1/89.8?mmHg at week 4 (post hoc), 139.5/89.6?mmHg with losartan 100?mg at week 8 (secondary), 134.3/85.9?mmHg with losartan 100?mg/HCTZ 12.5?mg at week 12 (primary), and 132.1/84.9?mmHg with losartan 100?mg/HCTZ50?mg at week 16 (secondary) (all p < 0.05). Rates of clinical adverse experi­ences were similar between treatment groups. A limitation of these analyses is the relatively rapid rate of study drug titration, which may not have allowed for the evaluation of the full treatment effect at each titration step.

Conclusions: We conclude that losartan alone or in combination with HCTZ was generally well tolerated and effective in the treatment of elevated systolic and diastolic BP in obese patients with hypertension.     

Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide : in moderate to severe hypertension

* The fixed-dose combination of irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is approved in the US for use as initial therapy in patients who are likely to need multiple agents to achieve their blood pressure (BP) goals. * In a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial in 538 patients with moderate hypertension that was untreated or uncontrolled by monotherapy, the mean reduction from baseline in seated systolic BP (SeSBP) at week 8 (primary endpoint) was significantly greater with irbesartan/HCTZ than with either irbesartan or HCTZ as monotherapy. * In addition, the proportion of patients with moderate hypertension achieving controlled BP (SeSBP < 140 mmHg/seated diastolic BP [SeDBP] < 90 mmHg) at 12 weeks was significantly greater with irbesartan/HCTZ combination therapy than with irbesartan or HCTZ monotherapy. * In a 7-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial in 697 patients with severe hypertension that was untreated or uncontrolled by monotherapy, a significantly greater proportion achieved a trough SeDBP of < 90 mmHg following 5 weeks of combination therapy with irbesartan/HCTZ compared with irbesartan monotherapy (primary endpoint). * Furthermore, the proportion of patients with severe hypertension achieving controlled BP of < 140/90 mmHg was significantly greater at all timepoints of the trial compared with irbesartan monotherapy. * Irbesartan/HCTZ combination therapy had a similar tolerability profile to irbesartan and HCTZ monotherapy. Most adverse events were of mild to moderate intensity.     

Treatment with atenolol prevents progression of microalbuminuria in type I diabetic patients.

Nine patients with Type I diabetes mellitus, diastolic blood pressure of 90 to 100 mmHg and persistent microalbuminuria of greater than or equal to 30 micrograms/min were treated with 50 to 100 mg atenolol daily for 3 years in an uncontrolled pilot study to assess the effect of long-term reduction of blood pressure on microalbuminuria. Treatment with atenolol prevented progression of microalbuminuria with a median (range) urinary albumin excretion rate before treatment of 74 (33 to 196) micrograms/min and 50 (5 to 123) micrograms/min after 3 years of therapy (p less than 0.05). Blood pressure was significantly reduced from 156 (121 to 187) mmHg systolic and 95 (90 to 100) mmHg diastolic before treatment to 143 (112 to 168) mmHg systolic (p less than 0.04) and 82 (66 to 84) mmHg diastolic (p less than 0.0003) at 3 years. Measurements of renal function and diabetic control remained unchanged throughout the study period. These results suggest that early and prolonged use of antihypertensive therapy is beneficial in slowing down progression of microalbuminuria.     

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system gene polymorphisms and antihypertensive response to irbesartan in Chinese hypertensives

The aim of this study was to determine whether specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and their reconstructed haplotypes in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) genes were associated with antihypertensive reduction to irbesartan treatment. Thousand one forty-two hypertensives were recruited and received 150 mg irbesartan daily for 4 weeks. Blood pressures (BPs) and blood samples, at postdose on the 28th day, were measured. Predose BPs and plasma irbesartan concentrations were also measured. Involved SNPs in RAAS pathway genes were genotyped. Genotype (-344 TC) in the CYP11B2 had a significantly greater systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction versus the TT genotype (p = 0.001). Subjects with the 174MM genotype of the angiotensinogen (AGT) gene had a significantly greater average SBP reduction (p = 0.025). The C-344T and T1016C polymorphisms in the CYP11B2 gene were both significantly associated with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction (p = 0.026 or p = 0.003). Overall, the three loci-constructed haplotypes of the CYP11B2 gene were associated with DBP reduction (p = 0.008). Haplo-GLM analyses demonstrated that subjects with haplotype CTA had a significantly greater SBP and DBP reductions (p < 0.001 or p = 0.020), whereas subjects with haplotype TAA had a significantly lower SBP and DBP reductions (p < 0.001). Our findings suggested that SNPs and their reconstructed haplotypes in RAAS genes might be involved in the regulation of BP-lowering response to irbesartan in Chinese hypertensives.     

Antihypertensive effect of low-dose hydrochlorothiazide alone or in combination with quinapril in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension

In this study, using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, the authors assessed the potential for BP control using hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ, 12.5 mg daily), given as a monotherapy over 12 months to 49 black South African patients with mild to moderate hypertension (mean day diastolic blood pressure [DBP] > or = 90 and < 115 mmHg). Uncontrolled patients received fixed combination of quinapril/HCTZ 10/12.5, 20/12.5, and 20/25 mg, with dose titration at 3 monthly intervals if BP control was not achieved (day DBP < 90 mmHg). Overall, profound and sustained BP reduction was observed at the end of the study. The 24-hour BP decreased from 151 +/- 14/98 +/- 7 to 136 +/- 15/87 +/- 9 mmHg (p < 0.0001 at end of study vs. baseline); the mean day BP decreased from 155 +/- 14/104 +/- 7 to 140 +/- 15/91 +/- 10 mmHg (p < 0.0001 at end of study vs. baseline). The overall control (mean day DBP < 90 mmHg) and response (decrease in day DBP > or = 10 mmHg) rates were 49% and 61%, respectively. At the end of the study, only 2 patients (4%) remained on treatment with HCTZ. Out of the initial 12 patients controlled on HCTZ at 3 months (12/49, 24%), 5 patients remained controlled at 6 months and only 1 patient at 12 months. In contrast, quinapril/HCTZ combinations maintained their antihypertensive effect up to 9 months, with a significant number of patients (22/49, 45%) requiring the highest dose of the combination (20/25 mg daily). In conclusion, low-dose HCTZ should not be recommended as monotherapy in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension due to the fact that the BP-lowering effect is attenuated already at 6 months of treatment, with most patients requiring the addition of the ACE inhibitor.     

Efficacy and safety of triple antihypertensive therapy with the olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide combination

Background: European hypertension guidelines estimate that up to 15-20% of hypertensive patients are not controlled on a dual antihypertensive combination and require three or more different antihypertensive drug classes to achieve blood pressure (BP) control. Objective: This study in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension assessed the efficacy and safety of adding hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5?mg and 25?mg to a range of olmesartan medoxomil (OLM)/amlodipine (AML) doses. Study Design: This phase III, multicentre study had a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design that included a double-blind safety run-in and a double-blind treatment period. Intervention: Enrolled patients were screened and previous therapy was discontinued if required. During a 2-week, double-blind, safety run-in period (Weeks 0-2), patients were randomized to receive placebo, OLM/AML 20?mg/5?mg, OLM/AML 40?mg/5?mg or OLM/AML 40?mg/10?mg. During an 8-week, double-blind treatment period (Weeks 3-10), patients were allocated to eight groups depending on their initial treatment. They were either randomized to continue with the same dose of OLM/AML, or have HCTZ 12.5?mg or 25?mg added to treatment. Main Outcome Measure: The primary endpoint was formulated before data collection began. It was the change in mean diastolic BP (DBP) from baseline to Week 10 in groups with HCTZ added to OLM/AML, compared with the corresponding dual OLM/AML therapy. Results: Of 3195 patients who were screened, 2690 were randomized. Patients in every triple OLM/AML/HCTZ group had significantly greater mean reductions in DBP (p?≤?0.032 for each comparison) and systolic BP (SBP) by Week 10 (p?≤?0.0034 for each comparison), compared with patients on the corresponding OLM/AML therapy dose. The significant improvements in DBP and SBP reduction with triple OLM/AML/HCTZ therapy, compared with dual OLM/AML therapy, were observed after 4 and 6 weeks of therapy. Patients in each triple therapy group also had a significantly higher rate of BP <140/90?mmHg threshold achievement (p?≤?0.05 for each treatment comparison), compared with the dual OLM/AML groups. In three of the OLM/AML/HCTZ groups (40?mg/5?mg/25?mg, 40?mg/10?mg/12.5?mg and 40?mg/10?mg/25?mg), BP <140/90?mmHg threshold achievement by Week 10 was over 70%. Across the triple and dual combination therapy groups, treatment was well tolerated and no safety concerns for either treatment were identified. Conclusion: Adding HCTZ to a range of OLM/AML dose combinations is well tolerated and improved BP control by significantly lowering DBP and SBP and significantly increasing BP threshold achievement in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension. Clinical Trial Registration: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier as NCT00923091.     

Long-term,open-label evaluation of the safety and efficacy of telmisartan 80 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg fixed-dose combination alone or with other antihypertensive medication

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with telmisartan 80 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (T80/H25) fixed-dose combination (FDC) in patients who completed a previous double-blind study, in which T80/H25 provided more blood pressure (BP) reduction and produced a BP response in more patients than did T80/H12.5 FDC. Methods: Patients received open-label T80/H25 for 24 weeks; further antihypertensive medication was permitted. Seated trough BP was measured at weeks 0, 4, 12 and 24. Results: Primary end point (seated trough diastolic BP (DBP) control (< 90 mmHg)) was achieved in 71.4% of patients versus 52.4% at baseline (n = 639). The improvement was apparent at week 4 and sustained thereafter. In patients who received more antihypertensive medication (111/639 (17.4%)), DBP control increased from 24.8% at baseline to 58.6% at week 24. Seated trough systolic BP (SBP)/DBP were reduced from 141.0/89.0 mmHg at baseline by 4.6/3.6 mmHg by week 24. SBP response (< 140 or ≥ 20 mmHg reduction from start of previous trial) and DBP response (< 90 or ≥ 10 mmHg reduction from start of previous trial) increased at week 24 versus baseline from 51.8 to 69.3% and from 55.8 to 74.3%, respectively. At week 24, 110 (17.4%) patients achieved normal SBP/DBP (< 130/< 85 mmHg) and a further 24 (3.8%) patients achieved optimal SBP/DBP (< 120/< 80 mmHg). T80/H25 FDC was well tolerated; drug-related adverse events occurred in 29 (4.5%) patients. Conclusion: T80/H25 provides sustained and well-tolerated additive BP control, given alone or as part of a multi-antihypertensive therapy.     

The effect of irbesartan in reducing cardiovascular risk in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients: an observational study in 16 600 patients in primary care

SUMMARY

Objectives: As arterial hypertension substantially increases the risk of premature death, cardiovascular disease and renal insufficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes, effective and safe antihypertensive therapy is of importance. Therefore, the effect of irbesartan as monotherapy, or in fixed combination with hydrochlorothiazide, on blood pressure, metabolic parameters and microalbuminuria and the safety and tolerability of the drug were assessed.

Research design and methods: Multicentric, prospective, open phase IV study over 3 months in 16?600 patients with the clinical diagnoses of hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Blood pressure was measured sphygmometrically and albuminuria was assessed with semi-quantitative urine dipsticks.

Main outcome measures: Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure reduction, proportion of patients with microalbuminuria and cardiovascular risk calculated based on the SCORE score, each after a follow-up of 3 months compared to baseline. Number and nature of adverse events (AEs).

Results: The sample consisted of 51.3% men, mean age was 62.2 ± 10.7 years, 53.9% of patients were overweight and 26.4% were obese. Mean SBP/DBP decrease after 3 months was 22.3/11.2?mmHg. The BP lowering effect was similar in the analyses of various subgroups (according to age group, sex, presence of micro- or macrovascular complications). Irbesartan treatment reduced the percentage of patients with microalbuminuria from 45.6% to 30.6% at 3 months (32.9% relative reduction). Metabolic parameters (lipids, blood glucose, HbA1c) and weight were improved significantly or showed trends for improvement, respectively. The mean 10-year cardiovascular risk as calculated with the SCORE score was decreased from a baseline value of 9.8% to 5.7% (–58% relative reduction). Tolerability was excellent: only 0.3% experienced an AE.

Conclusions: Treatment with irbesartan in patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes led to large blood pressure reductions. In view of the renoprotective effect documented by the reduced rate of patients with albuminuria, and the improvement of further metabolic parameters, these changes translate into a reduction of cardiovascular risk.     

The effect of irbesartan in reducing cardiovascular risk in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients: an observational study in 16,600 patients in primary care

OBJECTIVES: As arterial hypertension substantially increases the risk of premature death, cardiovascular disease and renal insufficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes, effective and safe antihypertensive therapy is of importance. Therefore, the effect of irbesartan as monotherapy, or in fixed combination with hydrochlorothiazide, on blood pressure, metabolic parameters and microalbuminuria and the safety and tolerability of the drug were assessed. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Multicentric, prospective, open phase IV study over 3 months in 16,600 patients with the clinical diagnoses of hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Blood pressure was measured sphygmometrically and albuminuria was assessed with semi-quantitative urine dipsticks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure reduction, proportion of patients with microalbuminuria and cardiovascular risk calculated based on the SCORE score, each after a follow-up of 3 months compared to baseline. Number and nature of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The sample consisted of 51.3% men, mean age was 62.2+/-10.7 years, 53.9% of patients were overweight and 26.4% were obese. Mean SBP/DBP decrease after 3 months was 22.3/11.2 mmHg. The BP lowering effect was similar in the analyses of various subgroups (according to age group, sex, presence of micro- or macrovascular complications). Irbesartan treatment reduced the percentage of patients with microalbuminuria from 45.6% to 30.6% at 3 months (32.9% relative reduction). Metabolic parameters (lipids, blood glucose, HbA1c) and weight were improved significantly or showed trends for improvement, respectively. The mean 10-year cardiovascular risk as calculated with the SCORE score was decreased from a baseline value of 9.8% to 5.7% (-58% relative reduction). Tolerability was excellent: only 0.3% experienced an AE. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with irbesartan in patients with concomitant hypertension and type 2 diabetes led to large blood pressure reductions. In view of the renoprotective effect documented by the reduced rate of patients with albuminuria, and the improvement of further metabolic parameters, these changes translate into a reduction of cardiovascular risk.     

Effects of doxazosin and irbesartan on blood pressure and metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension

The objective of this trial was to compare the metabolic effects of long-term treatment with doxazosin to those of irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. We evaluated 96 hypertensive diabetic patients who were randomized to 12 months of double-blind treatment with doxazosin 4 mg/d or irbesartan 300 mg/d. At the end of the study, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) were significantly reduced from 152 to 140 mm Hg and from 97 to 87 mm Hg, respectively, with doxazosin (P < 0.01). SBP and DBP were reduced from 150 to 134 mm Hg and from 94 to 83 mm Hg, respectively, with irbesartan (P < 0.01). Irbesartan had significantly better antihypertensive efficacy than doxazosin (P < 0.05). Doxazosin had the greatest effect on glucose metabolism and lipid parameters, with significant (P 相似文献   

厄贝沙坦治疗192例高血压患者疗效分析

目的探讨厄贝沙坦对高血压患者治疗效果。方法192例高血压患者应用厄贝沙坦治疗12周,比较治疗前、后24h收缩压、舒张压、血压变异性及左心室质量变化。结果24h平均收缩压（24hSBP）、白天平均收缩压（dSBP）、白天平均舒张压（dDBP）、夜间平均收缩夺（nSBP）及24h收缩压变异性（24hSBPV）、24h舒张压变异性（24hDBPv）较治疗前明显下降（P〈0．05）;左心室质量较治疗前减轻。结论厄贝沙坦可降低高血压患者的血压变异性,减轻左心室质量。     

Optimization of blood pressure treatment with fixed-combination perindopril/amlodipine in patients with arterial hypertension

Background: Fixed-dose combination treatments using an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, such as perindopril, plus a calcium channel blocker (CCB), such as amlodipine, have been endorsed by guidelines because they improve blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients, while being well tolerated and well adhered to by patients. Objective: This study aimed to assess the blood pressure-lowering effects of fixed-combination perindopril/amlodipine in patients previously treated with an ACE inhibitor and/or a CCB. Methods: This was a prospective, real-life, open-label, longitudinal, phase IV study conducted in 223 outpatient medical centres across Slovakia. 2132 previously treated patients whose hypertension was insufficiently controlled at baseline or who tolerated treatment poorly were included. Patients were treated for 3 months with fixed-combination perindopril/amlodipine 5?mg/5?mg, 5?mg/10?mg, 10?mg/5?mg and 10?mg/10?mg. The main outcome measure was a reduction in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and achievement of blood pressure targets (SBP/DBP <140/90?mmHg or <130/80?mmHg for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or high cardiovascular risk). Results: After 3 months of treatment, mean?±?SD SBP/DBP had decreased from 158.5?±?17.5/93.6?±?9.8?mmHg to 132.9?±?10.6/80.7?±?6.2?mmHg (p?相似文献   

A comparison of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide with hydrochlorothiazide in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients with mild to moderate hypertension

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study of the tolerability and antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily fosinopril 20 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg (FOS/HCTZ) compared with once-daily hydrochlorothiazide 25mg (HCTZ) was conducted in 142 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and mild to moderate essential hypertension. After 12 weeks of treatment, both groups had statistically significant mean changes from baseline in seated diastolic and systolic blood pressures (FOS/HCTZ, -15.0mm Hg; HCTZ, -11.9mm Hg for seated diastolic blood pressure). The difference between treatment groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In addition, normalisation of seated diastolic blood pressure was achieved in 85% of FOS/HCTZ patients compared with 71% of HCTZ patients. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in favour of FOS/HCTZ was observed for the total number of favourable responses (normalisation or >/=10mm Hg reduction in seated diastolic blood pressure) at week 12 and for the end-point analysis. One FOS/HCTZ patient and 5 HCTZ patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. No clinically significant changes in serum glucose, potassium or cholesterol were observed. A slight but statistically significant increase in fasting triglycerides occurred with FOS/HCTZ compared with HCTZ (+26.1 vs +13.5 mg/dl, respectively; p < 0.05). These results show that the combination of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide has considerable potential as an effective antihypertensive regimen that does not significantly alter glucose or lipid metabolism in patients with NIDDM.     

Long-term antihypertensive efficacy of ketanserin plus chlorthalidone

The long-term antihypertensive efficacy of a combination of ketanserin (20 mg), an S2 antagonist with alpha 1 blocking activity, and chlorthalidone (25 mg), given o.d., was evaluated in fifteen patients with primary hypertension of mild to moderate degree, aged 45-65 years, up to a 12-month observation period. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure, and heart rate (HR) were measured by an automatic recorder (Sentron Bard Biomedical) twice at rest after 5 min in a supine position and after 2 and 5 min in an upright position, 24 h after the last antihypertensive dose. Thirteen patients completed the study whilst two were lost to the follow-up. A significant reduction was observed in both SBP and DBP at rest. In particular, SBP was reduced from 167 +/- 17 mmHg to 152 +/- 21 mmHg (p less than 0.01) after 1 month of therapy and was kept constant at this level throughout the observation period. DBP was also reduced from the first control [99 +/- 7 vs. 90 +/- 9 mmHg (p less than 0.01)] without any increase during the follow-up. HR was unchanged throughout the study. Four patients had dizziness and orthostatic hypotension after the first dose of the drug combination but were able to continue the study without further adverse reactions. These data support the conclusion that long-term treatment with the combination of a small dose of ketanserin and chlorthalidone is able to reduce systolic and diastolic blood pressure, without remarkable untoward side-effects.     

厄贝沙坦单用及合用治疗轻、中度原发性高血压60例

目的 :比较国产厄贝沙坦单用以及与非洛地平或雷米普利合用对轻、中度原发性高血压的降压疗效。方法 :6 0例轻、中度高血压病人 ,经 2wk安慰剂导入期后 ,单服厄贝沙坦 15 0mg ,qd。 4wk后随机分 2组 ,分别联合服用非洛地平 5mg ,qd ,或雷米普利 5mg ,qd ,均为 4wk。治疗前及治疗后 4wk和 8wk行 2 4h动态血压监测 ,并测治疗前后坐位血压。结果 :厄贝沙坦单用 4wk后 ,坐位血压和2 4h动态血压均下降 (P <0 .0 5或P <0 .0 1) ,收缩压和舒张压的谷峰比值为 0 .82和 0 .86。厄贝沙坦与非洛地平或雷米普利合用 4wk后 ,坐位血压总有效率从 4 0 %增加为 89%和 70 % ;动态血压显示联合用药降压作用较明显。结论 :厄贝沙坦单用有长效的降压作用 ,与非洛地平或雷米普利联合用药有叠加降压作用