共查询到13条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
2.
流动单元的划分对于缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏的开发具有重要的意义。目前流动单元划分的方法主要以静态的地震资料为主,结合动态的压力和流体进行定性的验证和调整,但是静态划分的精度较低,而目前动态调整和验证的方法均为定性分析。结合地质资料,建立了缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏的数值试井模型,提出了流动单元“背景区域”的概念,利用数值试井和背景区域,提出了一种确定流动单元边界的定量方法。以缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏的一口井为实例进行了分析,取得了较好的效果。 相似文献
3.
哈拉哈塘油田南部热瓦普区块奥陶系缝洞型油藏部分试采井为弱挥发油生产特征,当油藏压力低于饱和压力后,原油急剧收缩脱气,油层内气饱和度增加,生产气油比持续攀升,日产油能力迅速下降,导致天然能量过快衰竭,造成油藏最终采收率偏低。针对该区油藏地质特征,借鉴国内外此类油藏开发实践和经验,首次在热普3-5井实施超深缝洞型挥发油注水保压开采现场试验。通过多轮次注水补充能量,将油藏压力恢复至饱和压力以上,生产气油比显著下降,单井日产油量升高,有效遏制住由于地层脱气造成天然能量过快衰竭的不利形势。 相似文献
4.
碳酸盐岩储层的非均质性强,利用现有井控计算的储量呈现出含油(气)面积大、地质储量大、可采储量低、动用程度低的特点。基于高精度三维地震的缝洞量化雕刻技术更准确地刻画了非均质油(气)藏储层的特点。以塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘油田某区块为例,提出了缝洞型碳酸盐岩油气藏缝洞雕刻及储量计算方法——缝洞雕刻容积法。该方法在地质建模的地震缝洞体储层雕刻基础上,按照探明储量以缝洞系统、控制储量以缝洞带、预测储量以区块为计算单元开展三级储量研究。该方法创新性地将储层量化雕刻技术应用到缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏的储量计算中,实现了分储层类型的储量计算,该方法在科学、合理开展储量评估的同时可有效指导井位部署,实现有效动用。 相似文献
5.
6.
为了探讨利用单井动态响应判断缝洞型碳酸盐岩储集体的连通性, 以塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区为例, 在研究区储层分布特点和油水空间关系研究的基础上, 充分分析生产井的开发特征, 建立了单井上可以判识的5 种多缝洞体样式: 隔油底水连通式、隔油边水连通式、隔水底水连通式、隔水边水连通式和复合裂缝连通式, 并相应地指出了其形成原因和生产特征。提出了多缝洞体单井判识的3 种动态分析方法: 试采数据分析法、水驱特征曲线分析法和弹性产率分析法, 并指出了5 种多缝洞体样式相应的差异识别方法。结合缝洞体平面范围确定原则, 利用3 种方法识别出研究区多缝洞体3 个, 有效扩大了多缝洞体的供油面积, 多缝洞体的识别为研究区优化井网部署及开发方案调整提供了新的思路和理论依据。 相似文献
7.
基于已有注水开发指标的局限性和缝洞型油藏的复杂性和特殊性, 以塔里木盆地塔北区块奥陶系油气藏为例, 开展注水开发效果评价。提出了缝洞型油藏注水开发评价新指标———有效周期增油指数和有效周期增油率, 并给出了其计算公式。与传统量化指标比较, 新指标能较好地评价缝洞型油藏注水开发效果; 不同类型缝洞型储集体注水开发的适应性: 洞穴型和裂缝—孔洞型注水开发效果最好, 孔洞型次之, 裂缝型最差且不适合采用注水开发。并指出了可采地质储量是单井和多井注水替油选井的优先要素。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Steven R. Passmore Michael G. Johnson Saleh M. Aloraini Stephan Cooper Mina Aziz Cheryl M. Glazebrook 《Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics》2019,42(1):23-33
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of a single lumbar spinal manipulation (SM) intervention on the leg movement performance of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients in a small-scale registered randomized clinical trial.MethodsParticipants with LSS (n = 14) were tested at baseline for pain, lumbar range of motion, and behavioral or kinematic motor performance (using an established Fitts’ Law foot-pointing task), then underwent covariate adaptive randomization to receive SM or no intervention. Postintervention all dependent measures were repeated. Experimenters were blinded to patient group allocation. University ethics board approval was attained.ResultsFor the primary outcome movement time, there was no significant difference between groups. As predicted by Fitts’ Law, all participants had longer movement times as task difficulty increased. Secondary kinematic outcomes yielded no significant between-group differences. Consistent with Fitts’ Law, kinematic measures changed significantly with task difficulty. Pairwise comparisons revealed the kinematic variables were more adversely affected by greater movement amplitudes than target size changes. No exploratory differences in pain or lumbar range of motion were observed.ConclusionChanges in motor performance were not observed in this chronic pain population after a single SM intervention compared with a control group. Given the sample size, the study may have been underpowered to detect meaningful differences. Fitts’ Law was observed for the lower extremity–pointing task for an LSS population and may provide an objective measure of motor performance. 相似文献