恶性胸膜间皮瘤治疗新进展

恶性胸膜间皮瘤是一种与石棉接触密切的肿瘤,其侵袭性很强,起病隐匿,发现时已在中晚期,目前的治疗方案尚未能有很好的治疗效果.采用溶瘤细胞性单纯性疱疹病毒和顺铂诱导溶瘤细胞性单纯性疱疹病毒产生GADD34蛋白增量调节方案能对间皮瘤癌细胞有相对的特异性,是一种有前景的治疗方案.     

Employing Tumor Hypoxia for Oncolytic Therapy in Breast Cancer

Hypoxia is a common tumor condition associated with metastases, therapeutic resistance, and poor patient survival. Forty percent of breast cancers are hypoxic, with a median oxygen concentration of 3.9%, and a third of tumors have regions less than 0.3%. Normal breast tissue is reported to have oxygen concentrations greater than 9%. This tumor hypoxia in breast cancer confers resistance to conventional radiation therapy and chemotherapy, as well as making estrogen-receptor-positive tumors less sensitive to hormonal therapy. Novel treatment modalities are needed to target hypoxic tumor cells. Lower tumor oxygen levels compared with surrounding normal tissues may be utilized to target and enhance herpes oncolytic viral therapy in breast cancer. Attenuated oncolytic herpes simplex viruses offer a unique cancer treatment by specifically infecting, replicating within, and lysing tumor cells. They carry genetically engineered mutations to reduce their virulence and attenuate their ability to infect normal tissues. Studies have shown the safety and efficacy of oncolytic herpes simplex viruses in treating breast cancer both in humans and in preclinical models. The placement of essential viral genes under the control of a hypoxia-responsive enhancer, which is upregulated selectively in hypoxic tissue, represents a promising strategy to target oncolytic viruses precisely to hypoxic cancer cells. In this review we describe strategies to harness hypoxia as a trigger for oncolytic viral gene expression in breast cancer, thereby increasing the specificity of viral infection, replication, and cytotoxicity to hypoxic areas of tumor. Such a targeted approach will increase efficacy in the therapy of hypoxic tumors while achieving a reduction in total dose of viral therapy.Supported in part by AACR-Astra Zeneca Cancer Research and Prevention Foundation Fellowship (P.S.A), grants RO1 CA 75416 and RO1 CA/DK80982 (Y.F.) from the National Institutes of Health, grant MBC-99366 (Y.F.) from the American Cancer Society, grant BC024118 from the US Army (Y.F.), grant IMG0402501 from the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (Y.F. and P.S.A.) and grant 032047 from Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (Y.F. and P.S.A.)     

YB-1-basierte Virotherapie

Therapeutic intervention using oncolytic viruses is called virotherapy. This type of virus is defined by the ability to replicate in tumor cells only and to destroy these cells upon replication. In addition, this virus type is able to induce a tumor-directed immune response. Early clinical trials have confirmed the safety profile of oncolytic viruses. Currently, different groups are working on the development of oncolytic viruses with a focus on treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). A preliminary active recruiting clinical phase II/III trial ongoing in patients with a NMIBC was recently implemented in the United States. Our research group developed an oncolytic adenovirus that will soon enter a clinical phase I trial in patients diagnosed with glioma. This virus is being further modified for the treatment of NMIBC. In this review article, recent developments in the design and use of virotherapy in bladder cancer are summarized.     

Oncolytic virus therapy for prostate cancer

The use of replication-competent viruses that can selectively replicate in and destroy neoplastic cells is an attractive strategy for treating cancer. Various oncolytic viruses have been taken to clinical trials since a recombinant virus was first applied to cancer patients a decade ago. The concept of the therapy is simple: infectious virus kills the host cancer cells in the course of viral replication. It is important, however, that the virus does not harm the surrounding normal tissue. Oncolytic viruses can be classified largely into two groups: DNA viruses genetically engineered to achieve cancer specificity (e.g. adenovirus, herpes simplex virus and vaccinia) and RNA viruses of which human is not the natural host (e.g. Newcastle disease virus and reovirus). Prostate cancer has always been one of the major targets of oncolytic virus therapy development. The result of six clinical trials for prostate cancer has been published and several trials are now going on. Forty-eight of 83 (58%) patients evaluated in the phase I studies demonstrated a >25% decrease in serum prostate-specific antigen level without evidence of severe toxicities. The result shows the oncolytic virus therapy is promising toward clinical application. Here, we review the recent advances in the field and summarize the results from clinical trials.     

A Novel Genetically Modified Oncolytic Vaccinia Virus in Experimental Models is Effective Against a Wide Range of Human Cancers

Background

Replication-competent oncolytic viruses have shown great promise as a potential cancer treatment. This study aimed to determine whether a novel vaccinia virus, GLV-1h151, with genetic modifications enhancing cancer specificity and enabling virus detection, is effective against a range of human cancers and is safe when administered in preclinical models.

Methods

GLV-1h151 was modified with deletion of thymidine kinase enhancing specificity and insertion of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene. The virus was tested in several human cancer cell lines for cytotoxicity including breast, lung, pancreatic, and colorectal. Virus replication was assessed via visualization of GFP expression and bioluminescence, and viral plaque assays. Finally, GLV-1h151 was administered systemically or intratumorally in mice with pancreatic cancer xenografts (PANC-1) to assess virus biodistribution, toxicity, and effect on tumor growth.

Results

GLV-1h151 effectively infected, replicated in, and killed several cancer cell types. Detection and visualization of virus replication was successful via fluorescence imaging of GFP expression, which was dose dependent. When administered intravenously or intratumorally in vivo, GLV-1h151 regressed tumor growth (P < 0.001) and displayed a good biosafety profile. GLV-1h151 infection and replication in tumors was successfully visualized via GFP and bioluminescence, with virus presence in tumors confirmed histologically.

Conclusions

GLV-1h151 is effective as an oncolytic agent against a wide range of cancers in cell culture and is effective against pancreatic human xenografts displaying a good biosafety profile and ability to be detected via optical imaging. GLV-1h151 thus adds another potential medium for the killing of cancer and detection of virus in infected tissue.

     

Potent antitumor activity after systemic delivery of a doubly fusogenic oncolytic herpes simplex virus against metastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Although conventional radiation therapy and surgery are potentially curative treatments for organ-confined prostate cancer, there are few effective treatments for metastatic disease. Oncolytic viruses have shown considerable promise for the treatment of solid tumors including prostate cancer. We recently demonstrated that incorporation of a cell membrane fusion capability into an oncolytic herpes simplex virus (HSV) can significantly increase the antitumor potency of the virus. METHODS: We used a mouse model of primary and metastatic human prostate cancer established from PC-3M-Pro4 to evaluate three different types of oncolytic HSVs: non-fusogenic Baco-1, singly fusogenic Synco-2, and doubly fusogenic Synco-2D. RESULTS: Our results show that Synco-2D has greater oncolytic activity than either Baco-1 or Synco-2 virus. Against lung metastases of human prostate cancer xenografts, intravenous administration of Synco-2D had produced a significant reduction of tumor nodules by day 40 post-inoculation as compared with Synco-2 (P < 0.05), Baco-1 (P < 0.01), and PBS control (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the doubly fusogenic Synco-2D is an effective therapeutic agent for human metastatic prostate cancer.     

Utilizing tumor hypoxia to enhance oncolytic viral therapy in colorectal metastases

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of hypoxia-induced ribonucleotide reductase (RR) production on herpes oncolytic viral therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hypoxia is a common tumor condition correlated with therapeutic resistance and metastases. Attenuated viruses offer a unique cancer treatment by specifically infecting and lysing tumor cells. G207 is an oncolytic herpes virus deficient in RR, a rate-limiting enzyme for viral replication. METHODS: A multimerized hypoxia-responsive enhancer was constructed (10xHRE) and functionally tested by luciferase assay. 10xHRE was cloned upstream of UL39, the gene encoding the large subunit of RR (10xHRE-UL39). CT26 murine colorectal cancer cells were transfected with 10xHRE-UL39, incubated in hypoxia (1% O2) or normoxia (21% O2), and infected with G207 for cytotoxicity assays. CT26 liver metastases, with or without 10xHRE-UL39, were created in syngeneic Balb/C mice (n = 40). Livers were treated with G207 or saline. Tumors were assessed and stained immunohistochemically for G207. RESULTS: 10xHRE increased luciferase expression 33-fold in hypoxia versus controls (P < 0.001). In normoxia, 10xHRE-UL39 transfection did not improve G207 cytotoxicity. In hypoxia, G207 cytotoxicity increased 87% with 10xHRE-UL39 transfection versus nontransfected cells (P < 0.001). CT26 were resistant to G207 alone. Combining 10xHRE-UL39 with G207 resulted in a 66% decrease in tumor weights (P < 0.0001) and a 65% reduction in tumor nodules (P < 0.0001) versus G207 monotherapy. 10xHRE-UL39-transfected tumors demonstrated greater viral staining. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxia-driven RR production significantly enhances viral cytotoxicity in vitro and reduces tumor burden in vivo. G207 combined with RR under hypoxic control is a promising treatment for colorectal cancer, which would otherwise be resistant to oncolytic herpes virus alone.     

Current status of clinical trials assessing oncolytic virus therapy for urological cancers

Oncolytic virus therapy has recently been recognized as a promising new option for cancer treatment. Oncolytic viruses replicate selectively in cancer cells, thus killing them without harming normal cells. Notably, T‐VEC (talimogene laherparepvec, formerly called OncoVEX^GM‐CSF), an oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of inoperable melanoma in October 2015, and was subsequently approved in Europe and Australia in 2016. The efficacies of many types of oncolytic viruses against urological cancers have been investigated in preclinical studies during the past decade, and some have already been tested in clinical trials. For example, a phase I trial of the third‐generation oncolytic Herpes simplex virus type 1, G47Δ, in patients with prostate cancer was completed in 2016. We summarize the current status of clinical trials of oncolytic virus therapy in patients with the three major urological cancers: prostate, bladder and renal cell cancers. In addition to Herpes simplex virus type 1, adenoviruses, reoviruses, vaccinia virus, Sendai virus and Newcastle disease virus have also been used as parental viruses in these trials. We believe that oncolytic virus therapy is likely to become an important and major treatment option for urological cancers in the near future.     

Viral warfare! Front-line defence and arming the immune system against cancer using oncolytic vaccinia and other viruses

BackgroundDespite mankind's many achievements, we are yet to find a cure for cancer. We are now approaching a new era which recognises the promise of harnessing the immune system for anti-cancer therapy. Pathogens have been implicated for decades as potential anti-cancer agents, but implementation into clinical therapy has been plagued with significant drawbacks. Newer ‘designer’ agents have addressed some of these concerns, in particular, a new breed of oncolytic virus: JX-594, a genetically engineered pox virus, is showing promise.ObjectiveTo review the current literature on the use of oncolytic viruses in the treatment of cancer; both by direct oncolysis and stimulation of the immune system. The review will provide a background and historical progression for the surgeon on tumour immunology, and the interplay between oncolytic viruses, immune cells, inflammation on tumourigenesis.MethodsA literature review was performed using the Medline database.ConclusionsViral therapeutics hold promise as a novel treatment modality for the treatment of disseminated malignancy. It provides a multi-pronged attack against tumour burden; direct tumour cell lysis, exposure of tumour-associated antigens (TAA), induction of immune danger signals, and recognition by immune effector cells.     

Myxoma Virus Is Oncolytic for Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Cells

Background  Viral oncolytic therapy, which seeks to exploit the use of live viruses to treat cancer, has shown promise in the treatment of cancers resistant to conventional anticancer therapies. Among the most difficult to treat cancers is advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Our study investigates the ability of a novel oncolytic agent, myxoma virus, to infect, productively replicate in, and kill human pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Methods  The myxoma virus vMyxgfp was tested against a panel of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines. Infectivity, viral proliferation, and tumor cell kill were assessed. Results  Infection of tumor cells was assessed by expression of the marker gene enhanced green fluorescent protein (e-GFP). vMyxgfp had the ability to infect all pancreatic cancer cell lines tested. Killing of tumor cells varied among the 6 cell lines tested, ranging from >90% cell kill at 7 days for the most sensitive Panc-1 cells, to 39% in the most resistant cell line Capan-2. Sensitivity correlated to replication of virus, and was found to maximally exhibit a four-log increase in foci-forming units for the most sensitive Panc-1 cells within 72 h. Conclusion  Our study demonstrates for the first time the ability of the myxoma virus to productively infect, replicate in, and lyse human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells in vitro. These data encourage further investigation of this virus, which is pathogenic only in rabbits, for treatment of this nearly uniformly fatal cancer.     

Effective treatment of pancreatic tumors with two multimutated herpes simplex oncolytic viruses

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive, rapidly fatal disease against which current nonsurgical therapy has minimal impact. This study evaluates the efficacy of two novel, replication-competent, multimutated herpes viruses (G207 and NV1020) in an experimental model of pancreatic cancer. Four human pancreatic carcinoma cell lines were exposed to G207 or NV1020, and cell survival and viral progeny production were determined. Flank tumors in athymic mice were subjected to single or multiple injections of 1 X 10⁷ G207 or NV1020, and tumor volume was evaluated over time. For all of the cell lines, G207 and NV1020 produced infection, viral replication, and cell lysis (P <0.05). NV1020 resulted in a higher production of viral progeny compared to G207. The efficacy of viral tumor cell kill was greatest in those cells with the shortest in vitro doubling time. For flank tumors derived from hs766t, single or multiple injections of both viruses were equally effective and significantly reduced flank tumor burden (P <0.05). Complete hs766t flank tumor eradication was achieved in 25% (5 of 20) of animals treated with G207 and 40% (8 of 20) of animals treated with NV1020. In vivo efficacy correlated with in vivo tumor doubling time. There were no adverse effects related to viral administration observed in any animal. NV1020 and G2O7 effectively infect and kill human pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Given the lack of effective nonoperative treatments for pancreatic cancer, oncolytic herpes viruses should be considered for clinical evaluation. Presented in part at the Forty-First Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, San Diego, Calif., May 21–24, 2000.     

一氧化氮对组织特异性溶瘤腺病毒转染膀胱肿瘤细胞的影响

目的:研究一氧化氮(NO)对肿瘤组织特异性溶瘤病毒转染过程的影响及对外源基因表达的调节作用。方法:构建组织特异性溶瘤腺病毒,常规培养膀胱肿瘤BIU-87和5637细胞株,以硝普钠作为外源性NO的供体。应用PTIO和L-NMMA分别作为内源性NO的清除剂和诱导型一氧化氮合酶(NOS)的抑制剂。采用Nitrate/Nitrite Assay Kit检测NO和(或)病毒作用前后膀胱肿瘤细胞培养液中的NO水平。应用四甲基偶氮唑盐(MTT)法检测NO对重组病毒抗肿瘤细胞增殖的影响;透射电镜观察腺病毒颗粒进入细胞情况和亚细胞结构变化。结果:膀胱肿瘤细胞BIU-87和5637本身培养液中NO水平很低,给予外源性NO供体后NO水平随时间延长而升高。重组病毒Ad-UPⅡ-E1A能通过E1A基因发挥溶瘤作用。NO能够促进该病毒转染入BIU-87、5637细胞。50μmol/L和100μmol/L的NO联合Ad-UPⅡ-E1A 30MOI作用后能够促进肿瘤细胞的增殖,而200μmol/L的NO联合重组腺病毒作用后则促进肿瘤细胞的死亡。NO对Ad-UPⅡ-E1A的作用具有时间依赖性。透射电镜观察发现,重组病毒Ad-UPⅡ-E1A能够进入并在膀胱肿瘤细胞内复制,而NO能够提高病毒的转染效率并引起肿瘤细胞自吞噬和凋亡。结论:NO能够促进溶瘤腺病毒Ad-UPIIE1A转染膀胱肿瘤细胞的效率,但NO因其浓度不同对溶瘤腺病毒的溶瘤效果具有双向调节作用,低剂量的NO能够下调重组病毒E1A的表达从而促进肿瘤细胞增殖,而高剂量的NO通过上调E1A的表达因而发挥溶瘤效应。     

Oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus administered by isolated limb perfusion suppresses osteosarcoma growth

A significant limitation to oncolytic virotherapy in vivo is the lack of a clinically relevant means of delivering the virus. We evaluated the oncolytic activity of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) in human osteosarcoma cells and explored isolated limb perfusion (ILP) as a novel oncolytic virus delivery system to extremity sarcoma in immune‐competent rats. Human and rat osteosarcoma cells transduced with rVSV‐lacZ uniformly expressed β‐gal. VSV was fully capable of replicating its RNA genome in all osteosarcoma cell lines, and efficiently killed them in time‐ and dose‐dependent manners, whereas normal bone marrow stromal cells were refractory to the virus. VSV delivered by ILP inhibited growth of osteosarcoma xenografts more potently than that injected intravenously and intratumorally in the hind limb of immune‐competent rats. Histopathological sections of tumor lesions treated by ILP‐delivered VSV showed positive for VSV‐G protein. There were no VSV‐G expressions in perfused leg muscle, nonperfused leg muscle, brain, lung, and liver in VSV‐treated rats. Our findings show efficient VSV gene expression and replication in osteosarcoma cells, suggesting that osteosarcoma may be a promising target for oncolytic virotherapy with VSV. Furthermore, we firstly showed that ILP of VSV against extremity sarcoma caused antitumor activity. © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:795–800, 2011     

Is post-Lipiodol CT better than i.v. contrast CT scan for early detection of HCC? A single liver transplant center experience

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a highly vascular neoplasm usually arising from a cirrhotic liver. Delayed, noncontrast, computed tomography (CT) imaging after 7 to 14 days reveals an oil-based contrast agent to be concentrated in the tumor but not in normal hepatic parenchyma. The aim of this study was to retrospectively correlate the post Lipiodol CT scan findings with respect to tumor size in the explanted liver. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation between November 1995 and December 2004 and also had an hepatic arteriogram with Lipiodol injection as part of their pretransplant workup. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, false-negativity, false-positivity, and accuracy of the test, as well as positive and negative predictive values. Lipiodol CT exam had sensitivity of 1.0; specificity of 0.6 with a calculated positive predictive value of 0.89 and a negative predictive value of 1.0. Overall accuracy of Lipiodol CT scan test was found to be 0.91, which was superior to an intravenous contrast CT alone. In conclusion, because of the higher sensitivity and accuracy values, hepatic arterial Lipiodol injection can be considered during the pretransplantation workup of high-risk cirrhotic patients, since the current model for End-stage Liver Disease scoring system for hepatocellular carcinoma is built on the ultimate bulk of the tumor. Further multicenter, controlled, large-volume prospective studies are warranted to verify this observation.     

Preoperative diagnostics in pancreatic carcinoma: would less be better?

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the value of preoperative diagnostics in patients with pancreatic carcinoma in terms of tumor diagnosis and evaluation of resectability. Patients/Methods: From 1 September 1985 to 31 December 1997, 408 patients shown by histology to have a ductal (n=330) or periampullary carcinoma (n=78) were treated at our hospital. Results: In determining the presence of tumor, ultrasonography and computed tomography (CT) had a sensitivity of 88.3% and 94.0%, respectively; combined, they had a sensitivity of 96.2%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) had a sensitivity of 96.2%. Preoperative aspiration biopsy cytology had a sensitivity of 71.4%. No correlation was found in the patients undergoing surgery between the preoperative level of serum CA 19-9 and the presence of distant metastases. Tumor infiltration of the portal vein was shown with a sensitivity of 33.3%, 24.3%, and 76.5% and a specificity of 93.9%, 98.9%, and 65.6% by ultrasonography, CT, and angiography, respectively. Ultrasonography and CT detected liver metastases or peritoneal carcinomatosis with a sensitivity of 35.9% each and a specificity of 91.9% and 91.7%, respectively. Conclusion: This study shows that, in 96% of patients with pancreatic carcinoma, ultrasonography and CT are adequate for diagnosis and for the evaluation of resectability. ERCP is not the method of choice in the diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma due to its invasiveness and to the fact that it fails to demonstrate the pathological anatomical location of the tumor; it should only be used if a tumor is suspected despite negative results on ultrasonography and CT or as an additional diagnostic method to differentiate between chronic pancreatitis and carcinoma. On account of the low sensitivity of percutaneous aspiration biopsy cytology, this method is not necessary preoperatively and may even lead to the spread of tumor cells. In 7% of patients, routine laparoscopy would additionally show liver metastases or peritoneal carcinomatosis not demonstrated using the imaging techniques. Received: 27 December 1997     

Potent oncolytic activity of human enteroviruses against human prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Oncolytic virotherapy offers a unique treatment modality for prostate cancer, especially stages that are resistant to current therapies, with the additional benefit of preferentially targeting tumor cells amongst an environment of healthy tissue. Herein, the low pathogenic enteroviruses; Coxsackievirus A21 (CVA21), as well as a bio-selected variant of Coxsackievirus A21 (CVA21-DAFv) and Echovirus 1 (EV1) are evaluated as novel oncolytic agents against human prostate cancer. METHODS: The surface expression of viral receptors required for enterovirus cell attachment/entry, including intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), decay-accelerating factor (DAF) and integrin alpha(2)beta(1) on a number of human prostate cancer lines was assessed by flow cytometry. Susceptibility to viral oncolysis was determined via in vitro cell lysis assays performed on cell monolayers cultured in micro titer plates. The in vivo oncolytic efficacy of the enteroviruses was assessed using xenograft models in immune compromised SCID-mice following systemic challenge. RESULTS: The majority of prostate cancer lines tested expressed surface ICAM-1 and/or DAF, or alpha(2)beta(1), facilitating significant degrees of oncolysis following in vitro viral challenge. Systemic delivery of each of the three viruses induced reduction of xenograft tumor burdens in vivo, and a therapeutic dose-response was demonstrated for escalating doses of EV1 in the LNCaP animal model. CONCLUSION: Enteroviruses CVA21, CVA21-DAFv, and EV1 are potentially potent oncolytic agents against human prostate cancer.     

Use of an oncolytic virus secreting GM-CSF as combined oncolytic and immunotherapy for treatment of colorectal and hepatic adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND: Oncolytic cancer therapy using herpes simplex viruses (HSV) that have direct tumoricidal effects and cancer immunotherapy using the cytokine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have each been effective in preclinical testing. NV1034 is a multimutated oncolytic HSV carrying the gene for murine GM-CSF that attempts to combine these 2 anticancer strategies. The purpose of this study was to compare NV1034 to NV1023, the parent HSV mutants lacking GM-CSF, to determine if such combined oncolytic and immunotherapy using a single vector has advantages over oncolytic therapy alone. METHODS: Expression GM-CSF in vitro did not alter the infectivity, cytotoxicity, or replication of NV1034 compared to the noncytokine-secreting control. Tumors infected with NV1034 produced GM-CSF in picogram quantities. In vivo efficacy of the viruses against murine colorectal carcinoma CT26 and murine hepatoma Hepa l-6 was then tested in subcutaneous tumors in syngeneic Balb/c and C57 L/J mice, respectively. In these immune-competent models, NV1034 and NV1023 each demonstrated potent antitumor activity. RESULTS: Treatment with NV1034 had significantly better antitumor effect compared to treatment with NV1023. Furthermore, there was no difference in the antitumor efficacy of these viruses in mice depleted of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Viral vectors combining oncolytic and immunotherapy are promising agents in treatment of colorectal carcinoma and hepatoma.     

Oncolytic herpes viral therapy is effective in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines

The rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in western countries, along with the poor prognosis offered by present-day treatment modalities, makes novel therapies for this disease necessary. Oncolytic herpes simplex viruses (HSV) are replication-competent viruses that are highly effective in the treatment of a wide variety of experimental models of human malignancies. This study seeks to investigate the effectiveness of oncolytic herpes viruses in the treatment of primary HCC cell lines. Sixteen commercially available human HCC cell lines were studied. G207 is an attenuated, replication-competent, oncolytic HSV engineered to selectively replicate within cancer cells. Cell lines were tested for viral sensitivity to G207 and their ability to support viral replication using standard cytotoxicity and viral replication assays. Eleven of 16 cell lines were moderately to highly sensitive to G207 viral oncolysis. HCC cell lines additionally demonstrated the ability to support viral replication in vitro with as high as 800-fold amplification of the administered viral dose observed. G207 is cytotoxic to, and efficiently replicates within, HCC cell lines in vitro. From these data, we suggest that oncolytic HSV therapy may have a role in the treatment of HCC, and in vivo studies are warranted. Presented in part at the 2005 American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Congress, Hollywood, Florida, April 14–17, 2005. Supported by grants R01CA75461 and R01CA72632 from the National Institutes of Health, and by grant MBC-99366 from the American Cancer Society (Yuman Fong).     

Inclusion of Tumor Markers Improves the Correlation of the Milan Criteria with Vascular Invasion and Tumor Cell Differentiation in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Liver Resection (#JGSU-D-07–00462)

The currently used criteria, such as the Milan criteria, to select a candidate of liver transplantation for HCC consists of size and number of tumors because vascular invasion and poor differentiation, the strongest prognostic factors, are difficult to be assessed preoperatively. We hypothesized that inclusion of two tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin) into the criteria would increase the prediction accuracy of these factors. Our hypothesis was tested in 478 HCC patients undergoing liver resection. The models with or without markers, constructed at predicting vascular invasion (n = 150) or poor differentiation (n = 49), were compared. The model including markers was superior at predicting the absence of vascular invasion to either the Milan criteria alone [at 81.2% sensitivity; specificity, 52.4 vs 43.3%; difference, 9.1%(95% CI, 1.3–14.2%)] or a model in which size and number varied freely [AUCs of receiver operating characteristic curves, 75.2 vs 69.1%; difference, 6.1%(2.33–10.7%)]. The model incorporating markers was also superior at predicting well to moderate differentiation to either the Milan criteria [at 74.5% sensitivity; specificity, 57.1 vs 38.8%; difference, 18.3%(2.4–32.7%)] or a model with size and number [AUCs, 71.5 vs 59.0%; difference, 12.5%(5.84–21.4%)]. In conclusion, the tumor marker levels should be considered when selecting patients with HCC for liver transplantation.     

Identification of a Lineage D Betacoronavirus in Cave Nectar Bats (Eonycteris spelaea) in Singapore and an Overview of Lineage D Reservoir Ecology in SE Asian Bats

Coronaviruses are a diverse group of viruses that infect mammals and birds. Bats are reservoirs for several different coronaviruses in the Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus genera. They also appear to be the natural reservoir for the ancestral viruses that generated the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreaks. Here, we detected coronavirus sequences in next‐generation sequence data created from Eonycteris spelaea faeces and urine. We also screened by PCR urine samples, faecal samples and rectal swabs collected from six species of bats in Singapore between 2011 and 2014, all of which were negative. The phylogenetic analysis indicates this novel strain is most closely related to lineage D Betacoronaviruses detected in a diverse range of bat species. This is the second time that coronaviruses have been detected in cave nectar bats, but the first coronavirus sequence data generated from this species. Bat species from which this group of coronaviruses has been detected are widely distributed across SE Asia, South Asia and Southern China. They overlap geographically, often share roosting sites and have been witnessed to forage on the same plant. The addition of sequence data from this group of viruses will allow us to better understand coronavirus evolution and host specificity.