Hip Dislocation: Are Hip Precautions Necessary in Anterior Approaches?

Background  

In 2005, we reported removal of functional restriction after primary THA performed through the anterolateral approach did not increase the incidence of dislocation.     

Can Squeaking With Ceramic-On-Ceramic Hip Articulations In Total Hip Arthroplasty Be Avoided?

Squeaking is a recognized complication of total hip arthroplasty with ceramic on ceramic bearings but the etiology has not been well identified. We evaluated 183 hips in 148 patients who had undergone ceramic-on-ceramic noncemented total hip arthroplasties at one center between 1997–2007 by standardized telephone interviews and radiographic review. Audible squeaking was reported from 22 hips (12% of 183) of 19 patients. Prevalence of squeaking was associated with younger age; obesity; lateralized cup position; use of beta titanium alloy femoral components and shortened head length options; and higher reported activity level, greater pain, and decreased satisfaction at the time of the interview. Squeaking was described as having little personal significance by most patients. Squeaking might be preventable in part through medialization of the acetabular cup and avoidance of the use of shortened femoral necks.     

Is Total Hip Arthroplasty after Hip Arthrodesis as Good as Primary Arthroplasty?

Background  

Conversion of hip arthrodesis to a THA reportedly provides a reasonable solution, improving function, reducing back and knee pain, and slowing degeneration of neighboring joints associated with a hip fusion. Patients generally are satisfied with conversion despite the fact that range of mobility, muscle strength, leg-length discrepancy (LLD), persistence of limp, and need for assistive walking aids generally are worse than those for conventional primary THA.     

Do Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Yield Comparable Results to Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Background

The incidence of hip fractures is growing with the increasing elderly population. Typically, hip fractures are treated with open reduction internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Failed hip fracture fixation is often salvaged by conversion THA. The total number of conversion THA procedures is also supplemented by its use in treating different failed surgical hip treatments such as acetabular fracture fixation, Perthes disease, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, and developmental dysplasia of the hip. As the incidence of conversion THA rises, it is important to understand the perioperative characteristics of conversion THA. Some studies have demonstrated higher complication rates in conversion THAs than primary THAs, but research distinguishing the 2 groups is still limited.

Does the Dual-Mobility Hip Prosthesis Produce Better Joint Kinematics During Extreme Hip Flexion Task?

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using dual-mobility (DM) design permits larger hip range of motion. However, it is unclear how it benefits the patients during activities of daily living. The purpose was to compare kinematic variables of the operated limb between THA patients using either DM or single-bearing (SB) implants during a squat task.

Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review

BackgroundOne goal of THA is to restore the anatomic hip center, which can be achieved in hips with developmental dysplasia by placing cups at the level of the native acetabulum. However, this might require adjuvant procedures such as femoral shortening osteotomy. Another option is to place the cup at the high hip center, potentially reducing surgical complexity. Currently, no clear consensus exists regarding which of these cup positions might offer better functional outcomes or long-term survival.Question/purposeWe performed a systematic review to determine whether (1) functional outcomes as measured by the Harris hip score, (2) revision incidence, and (3) complications that do not result in revision differ based on the position of the acetabular cup (high hip center versus anatomic hip center) in patients undergoing THA for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).MethodsWe performed a systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, including studies comparing the functional outcomes, revision incidence, and complications of primary THA in dysplastic hips with acetabular cups placed at the high hip center versus those placed at the anatomic hip center, over any time frame. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020168183) before commencement. Of 238 records, eight comparative, retrospective nonrandomized studies of interventions were eligible for our systematic review, reporting on 207 hips with cups placed at the high hip center and 268 hips with cups at the anatomic hip center. Risk of bias within eligible studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Due to low comparability between studies, data could not be pooled, so these studies were assessed without summary effects.ResultsSix studies compared Harris hip scores, two of which favored high hip center cup placement and three of which favored anatomic hip center cup placement, although none of the differences between cohorts met the minimum clinically important difference. Five studies reliably compared revision incidence, which ranged from 2% to 9% for high hip center at 7 to 15 years and 0% to 5.9% for anatomic hip center at 6 to 16 years. Five studies reported intra- and postoperative complications, with the high hip center being associated with higher incidence of dislocation and lower incidence of neurological complications. No clear difference was observed in intraoperative complications between the high hip center and anatomic hip center.ConclusionNo obvious differences could be observed in Harris hip score or revision incidence after THA for osteoarthritis secondary to DDH between cups placed at the anatomic hip center and those placed at the high hip center. Placement of the acetabular cup in the high hip center may lead to higher risk of dislocation but lower risk of neurologic complications, although no difference in intraoperative complications was observed. Surgeons should be able to achieve satisfactory functional scores and revision incidence using either technique, although they should be aware of how their choice influences hip biomechanics and the need for adjunct procedures and associated risks and operative time. These recommendations should be considered with respect to the several limitations in the studies reviewed, including the presence of serious confounding factors and selection biases, inconsistent definitions of the high hip center, variations in dysplasia severity, small sample sizes, and follow-up periods. These weaknesses should be addressed in well-designed future studies.Level of EvidenceLevel III, therapeutic study.     

Have Periprosthetic Hip Infection Rates Plateaued?

Background

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although the number of revision cases is increasing, the prevalence of PJI as an indication for revision surgery, and the variability of this indication among surgeons and hospitals, is unclear.

Is Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Safe?

Background

Safety data for outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains scarce.

Editorial Commentary: The Competitive Dancer’s Hip—An Acquired Flexible Attitude to a High-Performance Hip

Competitive dancers have a high prevalence of hip injuries. The dancer’s hip is a unique scenario in which hip impingement is associated with compensatory soft-tissue laxity. Particularly in these athletes, normal osseous hip morphology with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement may be observed. The repetitive training, including extreme daily hip range of motion, results in compensatory soft-tissue laxity and secondary impingement-induced subluxation. Peculiarly, hip impingement in dancers occurs in the posterosuperior aspect of the hip and extra-articularly between the anterior inferior iliac spine and the distal femoral neck (subspinous impingement). Normal or even dysplastic hips might impinge during extreme range of motion. An atypical osteochondroplasty, including a subtle distal-based femoral resection, anterior inferior iliac spine decompression, and excellent management of the capsule, should be considered in this population for a successful outcome. Hip dysplasia should always be ruled out in these athletes, and if present, a periacetabular osteotomy should be indicated.     

Are Revision Hip Arthroplasty Patients at Higher Risk for Venous Thromboembolic Events Than Primary Hip Arthroplasty Patients?

Background

The purpose of this study is to determine whether revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with increased rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) when compared to primary THA.

Return to Sporting Activity After Total Hip Arthroplasty—A Survey of Members of the British Hip Society

Background

Total hip arthroplasty is increasingly performed in younger, more active patients. Thirty-five percent of patients are involved in sports preoperatively, and a desire to return to sporting activity is now a major expectation. Sporting activity potentially risks premature failure of the implant, and there is no consensus or guidelines among British or European surgeons performing total hip arthroplasty in sporting patients.

Does Balancing a Total Hip Arthroplasty Require a New Paradigm? Functional 3-Dimensional Balancing in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundTraditional principles for successful outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) have relied largely on placing the socket in the native position and trying to restore static anatomical femoral parameters gauged on X-rays or intra-operative measurement. Stability is conventionally achieved by making appropriate changes during the time of trial reduction. Post-operative complications of dislocation and significant Limb Length Discrepancy (LLD) requiring foot wear modification represents opposite ends of the spectrum from a biomechanical perspective and these continue to be relatively high. A move towards giving more importance to functional dynamic parameters rather than static anatomical parameters and less reliance on stability testing at trial reduction is warranted.MethodsIntraoperative 3D functional balancing of THA without stability testing at trial reduction was practiced in all subjects undergoing THA in our unit from April 2014. To date 1019 patients have had their hips replaced with the same technique. They were followed up till April 2020 for post-operative complications of dislocation and significant LLD needing footwear modification. A secondary cohort of 114 patients from 1st January to December 31st 2017 within this primary group were analyzed clinically and radiologically to ascertain the implications of functional 3D balancing on X-ray parameters, clinical outcome scores (Harris Hip Score and Oxford Hip Score), ability to squat, and subtle subjective post-operative perception of limb lengthening (POPLL).ResultsIn the primary group of 1019 patients, there were only two dislocations and no patient needed footwear modification for LLD. In the detailed analysis of the secondary cohort of 114 patients, the correlation with restoration of static radiological parameters was inconsistent. 40 patients could not squat and 4 patients had subtle subjective post-operative perceived limb lengthening (POPLL). Measured outcomes such as HHS and OHS were improved in all patients with significant statistical significance (P < 0.001).ConclusionThis study underlines the fact that more importance must be given to functional dynamic parameters by 3D balancing of the THA and not on static anatomical X-rays parameters and stability testing during trial reduction. This represents a paradigm shift in the evolution of total hip arthroplasty.Level of EvidenceA Level II study. (Data collected from the ongoing prospective study) (http://www.spine.org/Documents/LevelsofEvidenceFinal.pdf).Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00505-3.