Variability in Acetabular Component Position in Patients Undergoing Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Who Have Concomitant Spine Pathology

BackgroundHip instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be a major cause of revision surgery. Physiological patient position impacts acetabular anteversion and abduction, and influences the functional component positioning. Osteoarthritis of the spine leads to abnormal spinopelvic biomechanics and motion, but there is no consensus on the degree of component variability for THAs performed by anterior approach. Therefore, we sought to present guidelines for changes in acetabular component positioning between supine and standing positions for patients undergoing primary THA by a uniform anterior approach.MethodsPerioperative patient radiographs of the pelvis and lumbar spine were collected. Images were used to determine acetabular component positioning and degree of coexisting spinal pathology, categorized as a Lane Grade (LG). Final analysis of variance was performed on a sample size of 643 anterior primary THAs.ResultsFrom supine to standing position, as the severity of lumbar pathology increased the change in anteversion also increased (LG:0 = ?0.11° ± 4.65°, LG:1 = 2.02° ± 4.09°, LG:2-3 = 5.78° ± 5.72°, P < .001). The mean supine anteversion in patients with absent lumbar pathology was 19.72° ± 5.05° and was lower in patients with worsening lumbar pathology (LG:1 = 18.25° ± 4.81°, LG:2-3 = 16.73° ± 5.28°, P < .001).ConclusionPatients undergoing primary THA by anterior approach with worsening spinal pathology have larger increases in component anteversion when transitioning from supine to standing positions. Consideration should be given to this expected variability when placing the patient’s acetabular component.     

The Influence of Pelvic Tilt on the Anteversion Angle of the Acetabular Prosthesis

The concept of the “safe area” of the acetabular prosthesis has a long history and has been recognized by many scholars. It is generally believed that postoperative hip dislocation rate is low, when the acetabular anteversion angle is placed in the range of 15° ± 10°. Despite this, hip dislocation is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty. In recent years, more and more scholars have paid attention to the influence of pelvic tilt on the acetabular anteversion angle. The concept of acetabular anteversion changes as the pelvic tilt changes, and is challenging the traditional acetabular prosthesis “safe area.” This study summarized the potential influencing factors of pelvic tilt and discussed the influence of the phenomenon on the anteversion angle of total hip arthroplasty (THA) acetabular prosthesis based on the literature review. We conclude that from the supine position to standing, followed by sitting, the pelvis tends to move backward. Pelvic sagittal activity, lumbar disease (ankylosing spondylitis), lumbar fusion (lumbar fusion, spine‐pelvic fusion), and other factors related to the tilt are THA risk factors for postoperative dislocation and revision. With the change of body position, the degree of acetabular anteversion is directly related to the degree of pelvic tilt. The acetabular anteversion varies greatly, which leads to increased hip prosthesis wear and even hip dislocation. The lateral X‐ray of the spine and pelvis is recommended in supine, standing, and sitting positions before THA. In addition, the pelvic tilt should be regarded as a reference of the acetabular prosthesis in the preoperative planning of THA.     

Pelvic tilt between supine and standing after total hip arthroplasty an RSA up to seven years after the operation

The pose of the prosthetic components after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly evaluated on conventional radiographs. Any change of the pelvic position after the operation in supine and between supine and standing position with time will influence validity of the measurements. We evaluated the changed pelvic tilt angle (PTA) in supine and standing position up to 7 years after operation. The aims of our study were (a) to evaluate if the PTA change over time after THA, (b) to assess any difference in PTA between supine and standing positions, and (c) to investigate whether factors such as gender, the condition of the opposite hip or low‐back pain have any influence on PTA after THA. Repeated radiostereophotogrammetric radiographs of 106 patients were studied. Patients had been examined in the supine position postoperatively, and in both supine and standing positions at 6 months and 7‐year follow‐up. Measurements of supine patients showed an increasing mean posterior pelvic tilt over time. From supine to standing, the pelvis tilted in the opposite direction. At 6 months, the mean anterior tilt was 3.6° ± 3.8° (confidence interval [CI]: 2.8° to 4.3°) which increased to 6.4° ± 3.9° (CI: 5.7° to 7.2°) at 7 years. The mean changes in pelvic rotations around the longitudinal and sagittal axis were less than 1 degree, in both positions. In individual patients, this change reached about 11.0 degrees in supine and 18.0 degrees when standing.     

Does Pelvic Sagittal Inclination in the Supine and Standing Positions Change Over 10 Years of Follow-Up After Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Background

Functional anteversion and inclination of the cup change as the pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) changes. The purposes of this study were to investigate the chronological changes of PSI during a 10-year follow-up period after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to report the characteristics of patients who showed a greater than 10° change in the PSI from the supine to the standing position.

Posterior Pelvic Tilt From Supine to Standing in Patients With Symptomatic Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) significantly affects the femoral head coverage by the acetabulum in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), while no reports have quantified PSI in DDH patients in the supine and standing positions. Furthermore, little is known about how PSI changes after periacetabular osteotomies. Herein, PSI in the supine and standing positions was quantified in DDH patients preoperatively and postoperatively. Twenty-five patients with DDH who had undergone periacetabular osteotomies were analyzed. The preoperative PSI and the PSI 2 years after surgery were measured in the supine and standing positions using the image registration technique between radiographs and computed tomographic images. The percentage of patients who showed PSI changes of more than 10° from the supine to the standing position was quantified. PSI changed 8.2 ± 5.0° posteriorly from the supine to the standing position during the preoperative period. Posterior pelvic tilt of more than 10° was found in nine cases (36%). Two years after periacetabular osteotomies, the postural PSI change was 7.1 ± 3.9° posteriorly. When the preoperative and postoperative PSI values were compared, PSI in the standing position did not differ (p = 0.20). Similarly, the amount of PSI change from the supine to standing position was not significantly different (p = 0.26). In conclusion, posterior pelvic tilt in the standing position was found preoperatively in symptomatic DDH patients, and it remained for 2 years after periacetabular osteotomies. This postural change in PSI does not seem to influence the outcome of periacetabular osteotomy. However, during preoperative planning, surgeons should recognize that acetabular anteversion or anterior acetabular coverage differs between the supine and standing positions in some patients with DDH. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:578–587, 2020     

Change in pelvic tilt angle 2 to 4 years after total hip arthroplasty

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in pelvic tilt angle (PA) in the sagittal plane in the standing and supine positions for 2 to 4 years after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 21 male and 65 female patients were investigated before and after THA yearly over 2 to 4 years. Both the standing and supine PA significantly posteriorly tilted after THA. The difference in PA between the standing and supine positions (dPA) significantly increased after THA. Although the PA in the standing and supine positions plateaued 1 year after THA, the dPA gradually increased. In addition, the percentage of patients who showed a difference of more than 10° in dPA tended to increase yearly. In particular, elderly female patients who showed posterior tilt in PA in the standing or supine positions or a large dPA before THA tended to show a dPA of more than 10° after THA.     

Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Spinal Deformity Population: Does Degree of Sagittal Deformity Affect Rates of Safe Zone Placement,Instability, or Revision?

Background

Changes in spinal alignment and pelvic tilt alter acetabular orientation in predictable ways, which may have implications on stability of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients with sagittal spinal deformity represent a subset of patients who may be at particularly high risk of THA instability because of postural compensation for abnormal spinal alignment.

Intraoperative pelvic movement is associated with the body mass index in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty in the supine position

BackgroundsThere are very few reports on pelvic movement during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position. We investigated intraoperative pelvic motion in the sagittal and axial planes to determine if preoperative clinical factors, including body mass index (BMI) affect intraoperative pelvic motion.MethodsFifty-three patients with osteoarthritis undergoing THA in the supine position were included. Clinical factors, such as age, BMI, and pelvic tilt were assessed preoperatively. Intraoperative pelvic motion in the axial and sagittal planes was assessed using a portable navigation system. We assessed the change in pelvic tilt from registration to cup implantation as the pelvic tilt change; positive values indicated anterior pelvic tilt. We measured the values and absolute values of changes in axial rotation from registration to cup implantation to determine the axial rotation angle. The effects of patient factors on pelvic motion (pelvic tilt change and axial rotation angle) were analyzed using a Spearman's correlation analysis.ResultsPreoperative pelvic tilt was negatively correlated with pelvic tilt change (r = −0.57, p < 0.05) and the absolute axial rotation angle (r = −0.57, p < 0.05). BMI and absolute axial rotation angle were negatively correlated (r = −0.54, p < 0.05). Age was not correlated with change in the pelvic tilt and the axial rotation angle.ConclusionsPreoperative pelvic tilt and BMI are important factors to determine intraoperative pelvic motion in patients who undergo THA in the supine position. This can help surgeons to preoperatively identify patients with a higher risk of intraoperative pelvic motion.     

Posterior pelvic tilt in patients with decreased lumbar lordosis decreases acetabular femoral head covering

The relationship between pelvic tilt and acetabular femoral head covering was determined in 38 patients with decreased lumbar lordosis. Posterior pelvic tilt and acetabular femoral head covering were measured on radiographs taken in both supine and standing positions. Previously reported normal values obtained from 96 patients were used as controls. Posterior pelvic tilt increased (P<.01) in patients with decreased lumbar lordosis and anterior acetabular femoral head covering decreased (P<.0001) compared with the controls. These differences were more remarkable in the standing position than in the supine position. Patients with decreased lumbar lordosis have decreased femoral head covering, especially in the standing position.     

Effects of Sagittal Spinal Alignment on Postural Pelvic Mobility in Total Hip Arthroplasty Candidates

BackgroundRecent research has demonstrated that patients with reduced pelvic mobility from standing to sitting have higher rates of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study evaluates the effect of sagittal spinal deformity, defined by pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), on postural changes in pelvic tilt (PT).MethodsA multicenter database of 1100 preoperative THA patients was queried. Anterior-pelvic-plane tilt (APPt), spinopelvic tilt (SPT), and LL were measured from radiographs of patients in supine, standing, flexed-seated, and stepping-up postures; PI was measured from computed tomography. Patients were separated into 3 groups based on PI-LL (<?10°, ?10° to 10°, >10°) and propensity-score matched by PI. Lumbar flatback-deformity was defined as PI-LL > 10°, hyperlordosis: PI-LL < ?10°. SPT/APPt, including changes between each posture were compared across PI-LL groups using analysis of variance, with post-hoc Tukey tests. Pearson correlations were reported when testing associations between SPT/APPt change and PI-LL.ResultsAfter propensity-score matching, 288 patients were analyzed (mean 65 y; 49% F). SPT and APPt change differed across all PI-LL categories from standing to seated, supine, and stepping-up with less SPT/APPt recruitment among hyperlordotic vs flatback patients (all P < .001). Greater PI-LL correlated with greater SPT recruitment from standing to seated (R = 0.294), supine (R = 0.292), and stepping-up (R = 0.207) (all P < .001). Smaller LL changes from standing to seated were associated with greater SPT recruitment (R = 0.372, P < .001).ConclusionsPostural changes in SPT/APPt are associated with spinopelvic measures in THA candidates. Hyperlordotic patients tend to utilize their spines more compared with flatback patients who were more likely to recruit PT. Increased focus on patients with lumbar flatback and hyperlordosis may help in reducing prosthetic dislocation prevalence following THA.     

The influence of surgical approach on postoperative pelvic tilt after total hip arthroplasty

Background

Past reports have shown the tendency of posterior pelvic tilt to increase over time after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We have hypothesized that the volume and extent of released joint capsule may influence the change in postoperative pelvic tilt. This study was conducted to ascertain whether surgical approach during THA (posterior or anterior) has an effect on postoperative changes in pelvic tilt.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 81 hips in 60 patients. Patients classified as Crowe group 2, 3, and 4, those who had multiple previous compression fractures, and those with spinal fusion due to spinal arthrosis were excluded. Also, those who had previously undergone THA or total hip resurfacing also were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups, those with preoperative anterior pelvic tilt and those with posterior tilt. Preoperative and postoperative X-rays and CT scans for each group were assessed to determine the chronological change in pelvic tilt, and the data were statistically analyzed for patients who had experienced both the posterior and anterior approaches.

Results

Regardless of surgical approach, there was no significant difference in the mean change in postoperative APP angle over time in either the bilateral or unilateral cases or in the groups of preoperative anterior or posterior pelvic tilt.

Conclusions

Our results showed that surgical approach does not influence postoperative pelvic tilt after THA. In preoperative planning for THA, therefore, surgeons may need not to consider the difference of surgical approach with regard to postoperative changes in pelvic tilt.

     

Lumbar Spine Degeneration and Flatback Deformity Alter Sitting-Standing Spinopelvic Mechanics—Implications for Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundSpinal degeneration and lumbar flatback deformity can decrease recruitment of protective posterior pelvic tilt when sitting, leading to anterior impingement and increased instability. We aim at analyzing regional and global spinal alignment between sitting and standing to better understand the implications of spinal degeneration and flatback deformity for hip arthroplasty.MethodsSpinopelvic parameters of patients with full-body sitting-standing stereoradiographs were assessed: lumbar lordosis (LL), spinopelvic tilt (SPT), pelvic incidence minus LL (PI-LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA). Lumbar spines were classified as normal, degenerative (disc height loss >50%, facet arthropathy, or spondylolisthesis), or flatback (degenerative criteria and PI-LL >10°). Independent t-tests and analysis of variance were used to analyze alignment differences between groups.ResultsAfter propensity matching for age, sex, and hip osteoarthritis grade, 57 patients per group were included (62 ± 11 years, 58% female). Mean standing and sitting SPT, PI-LL, SVA, and TPA increased along the spectrum of disease severity. Increasing severity of disease was associated with decreasing standing and sitting LL. The flatback group demonstrated the greatest sitting SPT, PI-LL, SVA, and TPA. The amount of sitting-to-standing change in SPT, LL, PI-LL, SVA, and TPA decreased along the spectrum of disease severity.ConclusionSpinal degeneration and lumbar flatback deformity both significantly decrease lower lumbar spine mobility and posterior SPT from standing to sitting in a stepwise fashion. The demonstrated hypomobility in flatback patients likely serves as a pathomechanism for the previously observed increased risk of dislocation in total hip arthroplasty.     

Prevalence of Sagittal Spinal Deformity Among Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe important relationship between sagittal spinal alignment and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming well recognized. Prior research has shown a significant relationship between sagittal spinal deformity (SSD) and THA instability. This study aims at determining the prevalence of SSD among preoperative THA patients.MethodsA multicenter database of preoperative THA patients was analyzed. Radiographic parameters measured from standing radiographs included anterior pelvic plane tilt, spinopelvic tilt, and lumbar lordosis (LL); pelvic incidence (PI) was measured from computed tomography scans. Lumbar flatback was defined as PI-LL mismatch >10°, balanced as PI-LL of −10° to 10°, and hyperlordosis as PI-LL <−10°.ResultsA total of 1088 patients were analyzed (mean, 64 years; 48% female). And 59% (n = 644) of patients had balanced alignment, 16% (n = 174) had a PI-LL > 10°, and 4% (n = 46) had a PI-LL > 20° (severe flatback deformity). The prevalence of hyperlordosis was 25% (n = 270). Flatback patients tended to be older than balanced and hyperlordotic patients (69.5 vs 64.0 vs 60.8 years, P < .001). Spinopelvic tilt was more posterior in flatback compared to balanced and hyperlordotic patients (24.7° vs 15.4° vs 7.0°) as was anterior pelvic plane tilt (−7.1° vs −2.0° vs 2.5°) and PI (64.1° vs 56.8° vs 49.0°), all P < .001.ConclusionOnly 59% of patients undergoing THA have normally aligned lumbar spines. Flatback SSD was observed in 16% (4% with severe flatback deformity) and there was a 25% prevalence of hyperlordosis. Lumbar flatback was associated with increasing age, posterior pelvic tilt, and larger PI. The relatively high prevalence of spinal deformity in this population reinforces the importance of considering spinopelvic alignment in THA planning and risk stratification.     

Sagittal spinopelvic alignment and body mass index in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis

The sagittal orientation and osteoarthritis of facet joints, paravertebral muscular dystrophy and loss of ligament strength represent mechanical factors leading to degenerative spondylolisthesis. The importance of sagittal spinopelvic imbalance has been described for the developmental spondylolisthesis with isthmic lysis. However, it remains unclear if these mechanisms play a role in the pathogenesis of degenerative spondylolisthesis. The purpose of this study was to analyze the sagittal spinopelvic alignment, the body mass index (BMI) and facet joint degeneration in degenerative spondylolisthesis. A group of 49 patients with L4–L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis (12 males, 37 females, average age 65.9 years) was compared to a reference group of 77 patients with low back pain without spondylolisthesis (41 males, 36 females, average age 65.5 years). The patient’s height and weight were assessed to calculate the BMI. The following parameters were measured on lateral lumbar radiographs in standing position: L1–S1 lordosis, segmental lordosis from L1–L2 to L5–S1, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence and sacral slope. The sagittal orientation and the presence of osteoarthritis of the facet joints were determined from transversal plane computed tomography (CT). The average BMI was significantly higher (P = 0.030) in the spondylolisthesis group compared to the reference group (28.2 vs. 24.8) and 71.4% of the spondylolisthesis patients had a BMI > 25. The radiographic analysis showed a significant increase of the following parameters in spondylolisthesis: pelvic tilt (25.6° vs. 21.0°; P = 0.046), sacral slope (42.3° vs. 33.4°; P = 0.002), pelvic incidence (66.2° vs. 54.2°; P = 0.001), L1–S1 lordosis (57.2° vs. 49.6°; P = 0.045). The segmental lumbar lordosis was significantly higher (P < 0.05) at L1–L2 and L2–L3 in spondylolisthesis. The CT analysis of L4–L5 facet joints showed a sagittal orientation in the spondylolisthesis group (36.5° vs. 44.4°; P = 0.001). The anatomic orientation of the pelvis with a high incidence and sacral slope seems to represent a predisposing factor for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Although the L1–S1 lordosis keeps comparable to the reference group, the increase of pelvic tilt suggests a posterior tilt of the pelvis as a compensation mechanism in patients with high pelvic incidence. The detailed analysis of segmental lordosis revealed that the lordosis increased at the levels above the spondylolisthesis, which might subsequently increase posterior stress on facet joints. The association of overweight and a relatively vertical inclination of the S1 endplate is predisposing for an anterior translation of L4 on L5. Furthermore, the sagittally oriented facet joints do not retain this anterior vertebral displacement.     

Correlation between spinal and pelvic movements during gait and aggravation of low back pain by gait loading in lumbar spinal stenosis patients

BackgroundLumbar alignment of posterior or anterior tilts affects the exacerbation and remission of symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis patients. This study aimed to clarify the correlation between spinal and pelvic movements during gait and the aggravation of low back pain after gait loading in lumbar spinal stenosis patients.MethodsA total of 29 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis completed leg and low back pain assessments and gait analysis before and after gait loading tests. Patients were divided into leg and low back pain change (n = 8), leg pain only change (n = 12), and non-change (n = 9) groups based on the differences of leg and low back pain between before and after the tests. Peak kinematic values of the anterior tilts of the trunk, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, and pelvis during the stance phase were obtained via three-dimensional gait analysis.ResultsIn the leg and low back pain change group, the anterior lumbar and pelvic tilts were larger after than before the tests; however, in the leg pain only change and non-change groups, only the anterior lumbar tilt was larger after than before the tests. Anterior lumbar tilt before and after the tests negatively correlated with the aggravation of low back pain, and an increase in the anterior pelvic tilt positively correlated with the aggravation of low back pain.ConclusionsIn lumbar spinal stenosis patients, smaller anterior lumbar tilt and larger anterior pelvic tilt during gait loading may affect the aggravation of low back pain by gait loading. Increasing in lumbar lordosis during gait might be one of the factors leading to low back pain in lumbar spinal stenosis patients.     

Utility of Natural Sitting Lateral Radiograph in the Diagnosis of Segmental Instability for Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

BackgroundSegmental instability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is an indication for surgical intervention. The most common method to evaluate segmental mobility is lumbar standing flexion-extension radiographs. Meanwhile, other simple radiographs, such as standing upright radiograph, a supine sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or supine lateral radiograph, or a slump or natural sitting lateral radiograph, have been reported to diagnose segmental instability. However, those common posture radiographs have not been well characterized in one group of patients. Therefore, we measured slip percentage in a group of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using radiographs of patients in standing upright, natural sitting, standing flexion, and standing extension positions as well as supine MRI.Questions/purposesWe asked: (1) Does the natural sitting radiograph have a larger slip percentage than the standing upright or standing flexion radiograph? (2) Does the supine sagittal MRI reveal a lower slip percentage than the standing extension radiograph? (3) Does the combination of the natural sitting radiograph and the supine sagittal MRI have a higher translational range of motion (ROM) and positive detection rate of translational instability than traditional flexion-extension mobility using translational instability criteria of greater than or equal to 8%?MethodsWe retrospectively performed a study of 62 patients (18 men and 44 women) with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis at L4 who planned to undergo a surgical intervention at our institution between September 2018 and June 2019. Each patient underwent radiography in the standing upright, standing flexion, standing extension, and natural sitting positions, as well as MRI in the supine position. The slip percentage was measured three times by single observer on these five radiographs using Meyerding’s technique (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.88 [95% CI 0.86 to 0.90]). Translational ROM was calculated by absolute values of difference between two radiograph positions. Based on the results of comparison of slip percentage and translational ROM, we developed the diagnostic algorithm to evaluate segmental instability. Also, the positive rate of translational instability using our diagnostic algorithms was compared with traditional flexion-extension radiographs.ResultsThe natural sitting radiograph revealed a larger mean slip percentage than the standing upright radiograph (21% ± 7.4% versus 17.7% ± 8.2%; p < 0.001) and the standing flexion radiograph (21% ±7.4% versus 18% ± 8.4%; p = 0.002). The supine sagittal MRI revealed a lower slip percentage than the standing extension radiograph (95% CI 0.49% to 2.8%; p = 0.006). The combination of natural sitting radiograph and the supine sagittal MRI had higher translational ROM than the standing flexion and extension radiographs (10% ± 4.8% versus 5.4% ± 3.7%; p < 0.001). More patients were diagnosed with translational instability using the combination of natural sitting radiograph and supine sagittal MRI than the standing flexion and extension radiographs (61% [38 of 62] versus 19% [12 of 62]; odds ratio 3.9; p < 0.001).ConclusionOur results indicate that a sitting radiograph reveals high slip percentage, and supine sagittal MRI demonstrated a reduction in anterolisthesis. The combination of natural sitting and supine sagittal MRI was suitable to the traditional flexion-extension modality for assessing translational instability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.Level of EvidenceLevel III, diagnostic study.     

Preoperative Factors Associated With Low Back Pain Improvement After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Japanese Population

BackgroundSpinal disorders and low back pain (LBP) have been associated with worse clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is essential to identify spinal factors associated with post-THA LBP improvement. Therefore, we aimed to determine the proportion of patients with improved LBP after THA and to identify the preoperative spinal factors associated with LBP improvement.MethodsWe included 151 patients who underwent primary THA between December 2015 and December 2019 and had a preoperative visual analog scale score for LBP of ≥2. The patients were classified into the LBP improved or LBP continued group based on a visual analog scale score for LBP at 1 year after THA. Preoperative spinal parameters were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsNinety-five patients (62.9%) were classified into the LBP improved group. Among the coronal spinal parameters, the Cobb angle was significantly lower in the LBP improved group. Among the sagittal spinal parameters, the LBP continued group showed a significantly more posteriorly titled pelvis, lower lumbar lordosis, greater sagittal vertical axis, and greater pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, indicating a sagittal spinal imbalance. Logistic regression analysis found that preoperative factors associated with LBP improvement after THA had a low Cobb angle and high anterior pelvic plane angle (anteriorly tilted pelvis).ConclusionAmong patients with LBP before THA, 62.9% had improved LBP. Sagittal spinal imbalance and high Cobb angle were the key spinal factors associated with persistent LBP. Our findings suggest that hip surgeons should evaluate spinal alignment before THA in patients with LBP.     

Hip range of motion during daily activities in patients with posterior pelvic tilt from supine to standing position

In most patients with hip disorders, the anterior pelvic plane (APP) sagittal tilt does not change from supine to standing position. However, in some patients, APP sagittal tilt changes more than 10° posteriorly from supine to standing position. The purpose of this study was to both examine APP sagittal tilt and investigate the hip flexion and extension range of motion (ROM) required during daily activities in these atypical patients. Patient‐specific 4‐dimensional (4D) motion analysis was performed for 50 hips from 44 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty. All patients divided into two categories, such as atypical patients for whom the pelvis tilted more than 10° posteriorly from supine to standing position preoperatively (19 hips from 18 patients) and the remaining typical patients (31 hips from 26 patients). The required hip flexion and extension angles did not differ significantly between atypical patients and typical patients. In conclusion, the hip flexion ROM during deep bending activities and hip extension ROM during extension activities required in those atypical patients with pelvic tilt more than 10° backward from supine to standing position did not shift in the direction of extension. © 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 33:542–547, 2015.     

Does Patient-specific Functional Pelvic Tilt Affect Joint Contact Pressure in Hip Dysplasia? A Finite-element Analysis Study

BackgroundAlthough individual and postural variations in the physiologic pelvic tilt affect the acetabular orientation and coverage in patients with hip dysplasia, their effect on the mechanical environment in the hip has not been fully understood. Individual-specific, finite-element analyses that account for physiologic pelvic tilt may provide valuable insight into the contact mechanics of dysplastic hips, which can lead to further understanding of the pathogenesis and improved treatment of this patient population.Question/purposeWe used finite-element analysis to ask whether there are differences between patients with hip dysplasia and patients without dysplasia in terms of (1) physiologic pelvic tilt, (2) the pelvic position and joint contact pressure, and (3) the morphologic factors associated with joint contact pressure.MethodsBetween 2016 and 2019, 82 patients underwent pelvic osteotomy to treat hip dysplasia. Seventy patients with hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle ≥ 0° and < 20° on supine AP pelvic radiographs) were included. Patients with advanced osteoarthritis, femoral head deformity, prior hip or supine surgery, or poor-quality imaging were excluded. Thirty-two patients (32 hips) were eligible to this finite-element analysis study. For control groups, we reviewed 33 female volunteers without a history of hip disease. Individuals with frank or borderline hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle < 25°) or poor-quality imaging were excluded. Sixteen individuals (16 hips) were eligible as controls. Two board-certified orthopaedic surgeons measured sagittal pelvic tilt (the angle between the anterior pelvic plane and vertical axis: anterior pelvic plane [APP] angle) and acetabular version and coverage using pelvic radiographs and CT images. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities, evaluated using the kappa value and intraclass correlation coefficient, were good or excellent. We developed individual-specific, finite-element models using pelvic CT images, and performed nonlinear contact analysis to calculate the joint contact pressure on the acetabular cartilage during the single-leg stance with respect to three pelvic positions: standardized (anterior pelvic plane), supine, and standing. We compared physiologic pelvic tilt between patients with and without dysplasia using a t-test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test with a Bonferroni correction was used to compare joint contact pressure between the three pelvic positions. We correlated joint contact pressure with morphologic parameters and pelvic tilt using the Pearson or the Spearman correlation coefficients.ResultsThe APP angle in the supine and standing positions varied widely among individuals. It was greater in patients with hip dysplasia than in patients in the control group when in the standing position (3° ± 6° versus -2° ± 8°; mean difference 5° [95% CI 1° to 9°]; p = 0.02) but did not differ between the two groups when supine (8° ± 5° versus 5° ± 7°; mean difference 3° [95% CI 0° to 7°]; p = 0.06). The mean pelvic tilt was 6° ± 5° posteriorly when shifting from the supine to the standing position in patients with hip dysplasia. The median (range) maximum contact pressure was higher in dysplastic hips than in control individuals (in standing position; 7.3 megapascals [MPa] [4.1 to 14] versus 3.5 MPa [2.2 to 4.4]; difference of medians 3.8 MPa; p < 0.001). The median maximum contact pressure in the standing pelvic position was greater than that in the supine position in patients with hip dysplasia (7.3 MPa [4.1to 14] versus 5.8 MPa [3.5 to 12]; difference of medians 1.5 MPa; p < 0.001). Although the median maximum joint contact pressure in the standardized pelvic position did not differ from that in the standing position (7.4 MPa [4.3 to 15] versus 7.3 MPa [4.1 to 14]; difference of medians -0.1 MPa; p > 0.99), the difference in the maximum contact pressure varied from -3.3 MPa to 2.9 MPa, reflecting the wide range of APP angles (mean 3° ± 6° [-11° to 14°]) when standing. The maximum joint contact pressure in the standing position was negatively correlated with the standing APP angle (r = -0.46; p = 0.008) in patients with hip dysplasia.ConclusionBased on our findings that individual and postural variations in the physiologic pelvic tilt affect joint contact pressure in the hip, future studies on the pathogenesis of hip dysplasia and joint preservation surgery should not only include the supine or standard pelvic position, but also they need to incorporate the effect of the patient-specific pelvic tilt in the standing position on the biomechanical environment of the hip.Clinical RelevanceWe recommend assessing postural change in sagittal pelvic tilt when diagnosing hip dysplasia and planning preservation hip surgery because assessment in a supine or standard pelvic position may overlook alterations in the hip’s contact mechanics in the weightbearing positions. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effect of patient-specific functional pelvic tilt on the degeneration process of dysplastic hips, the acetabular reorientation maneuver, and the clinical result of joint preservation surgery.     

Change in Pelvic Sagittal Inclination From Supine to Standing Position Before Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Cup anteversion and inclination are important for avoiding implant impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. However, functional cup anteversion and cup inclination also change as the pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) changes. Therefore, PSI in both supine and standing positions was measured in a large cohort in this study.