Use of Jumbo Cups for Revision of Acetabulae With Large Bony Defects

Several methods of treatment are available for acetabular revision associated with bone loss. Jumbo cups (minimum diameter of 62 mm in women, 66 mm in men, or 10 mm larger than the normal contralateral acetabulum) are often useful for large defects. The purpose of this study is to report a large jumbo cup series with an average 10-year follow-up. A total of 196 jumbo cups in 186 patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up were available for review. Harris hip score improved from 44 preoperatively to 72 postoperatively. Survivorship was 98% at 4 years and 96% at 16 years. Five revisions and two resection arthroplasties were performed for failure. In conclusion, porous jumbo cup acetabular revision with supplemental screw fixation provides good to excellent intermediate- and long-term outcomes.     

One-Component Revision of Failed Hip Resurfacing from Adverse Reaction to Metal Wear Debris

This study assessed the results of 90 one-component revisions for failed hip resurfacing due to adverse reaction to metal wear debris (76 acetabular, 14 femoral). Patients with a femoral head size 40–45 mm (n = 33) received a two-piece titanium meshed shell with a cross-linked polyethylene liner and patients with femoral head size 46–54 mm (n = 43) received metal-on-metal components. Patients with femoral head size > 45 mm who wished a metal-polyethylene bearing received a dual mobility femoral prosthesis. The mean follow-up was 61 months and the procedure was successful in 97% of the patients. Three failures required re-revision; there was one deep infection. There were no dislocations. One-component revision is a reasonable alternative to revision to total hip arthroplasty.     

Medium-Term Results of Cementation of a Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Liner Into a Well-Fixed Acetabular Shell in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

The present study was undertaken to document outcomes of cementation of a highly cross-linked polyethylene (PE) liner into a well-fixed acetabular metal shell in 36 hips. All operations were performed by a single surgeon using only one type of liner. Patients were followed for a mean of 6.1 years (range, 3–8 years). Mean Harris hip score improved from 58 points preoperatively to 91 points postoperatively. There were no cases of PE liner dislodgement or progressive osteolysis. 1 hip (2.8%) required revision surgery for acetabular cup loosening with greater trochanteric fracture. Complications included 1 peroneal nerve palsy and 1 dislocation. The results of this study and previous reports demonstrated that cementation of highly cross-linked PE liner into well-fixed metal shell could provide good midterm durability.     

Inferomedial Hip Center Decreases Failure Rates in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe II and III Hip Dysplasia

Background

We sought to evaluate the outcomes of cementless acetabular components used in patients with Crowe II and III dysplasia, and to compare outcomes between cups placed within vs outside of an “anatomic” zone. Our specific aims were to (1) plot hip centers in these patients at our institution to characterize “anatomic” vs “nonanatomic” positions, (2) evaluate the association between hip center and radiographic loosening, (3) determine whether hip center was associated with acetabular component revision, and (4) compare patient-reported outcome scores between groups.

Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteonecrosis After Kidney Transplantation

This study was to determine the mid- to long-term survivorship of cementless metal-on-metal THA in 52 patients (74 hips) who underwent THA for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with a cementless THA. The mean follow-up was 10.2 years. The mean age at operation was 42.1 years (range, 25–62 years). The survivorship analysis with revision as the end point estimated a 96.6% chance of THA survival during 16.4 years. The average Harris hip score at last follow-up was 89.2 points (range, 74–100). Two patients (two hips) required revision surgery for extensive acetabular osteolysis at 9 years and acetabular liner dissociation at 2 years. The survival rates of cementless THA in these patients are encouraging. However, the possibility of metallic wear related complications are raising concern.     

Long-Term Results of Porous-Coated Anatomic Total Hip Arthroplasty for Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Hip

Between 1986 and 1997, 136 porous-coated anatomic (PCA) total hip arthroplasties were performed for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip, and data were available for 60 hips at final follow-up (mean follow-up, 15.2 years). Of these, 18 hips had undergone revision: 12 for the acetabular component, 10 for the femoral component, and 4 for both components. Survival rate at 23 years postoperatively was 60% for the acetabular component and 82% for the femoral component. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression showed that annual polyethylene wear rate, size, and abduction angle of the acetabular component were significantly associated with acetabular component revision surgery, and that annual polyethylene wear rate and filling ratio of the femur were associated with femoral component revision surgery.     

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Large Medial Defects With Witch's Hat-Shaped Structural Allografts — Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

A witch's hat-shaped structural allograft can restore bone stock over acetabular medial wall during revision total hip arthroplasty, which may be of importance for future re-revisions. However, long-term results are unclear. A retrospective review of 104 consecutive hips in 96 patients was performed to determine survivorship and functions. The minimum follow-up was 10 years. Nine patients required re-revision for cup aseptic loosening with a mean time to revision of 4.5 years. Kaplan–Meier survivorship was 89.4% at the endpoint. Radiographic evaluation revealed sixteen instances of minor medial wall graft absorption without significant cup migration. The mean modified Harris Hip Scores were 36 preoperatively and 86 at last follow-up. Revision acetabular surgery using a witch's hat-shaped allograft to restore acetabular medial wall provides an excellent alternative.     

Midterm Results of Large Diameter Biolox Forte Ceramic Head on Delta Ceramic Liner Articulation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Seventy-nine patients (94 hips), who underwent cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of a 36-mm delta ceramic liner-on-alumina ceramic femoral head, were followed for an average of 6.5 years (range, 5–7.7 years). All acetabular and femoral components were bone-ingrown and neither pelvic nor femoral osteolysis was identified until the latest follow-up. The survivorship with revision surgery as an endpoint was 97.9% (95% confidence interval = 100%–95%). Ceramic related complications such as fracture and squeaking did not occur in any patient. The mid-term results of cementless THA with this type of ceramic articulation are encouraging.     

Acetabular Cup Revision With the Use of the Medial Protrusio Technique at an Average Follow-up of 6.6 Years

A significant rim defect encountered during revision surgery can make stable cementless cup fixation difficult. One approach to this problem is to medialize the acetabular cup to improve the degree of rim contact. In this study, we investigate this technique, termed the medial protrusio technique, for acetabular fixation in revision hip arthroplasty. A retrospective review of 25 patients (25 hips) who underwent medialization was performed. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed. At an average follow-up of 6.6 years, the overall patient function and satisfaction were good to excellent, with a mean Harris hip score of 85.2. This demonstrates that the medial protrusio technique can be a valuable option in addressing acetabular cup failure.     

The 27 to 29-Year Outcomes of the PCA Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 50 Years Old

We previously reported our six and 19.4-year results of arthroplasty with the PCA total hip prosthesis. We now report on the performance of this prosthesis at 27–29 years. Eighty-eight consecutive primary THAs using a PCA total hip system were performed in 70 patients (mean age, 45.6 ± 11.1 years). The mean follow-up was 28.4 years (27–29). The mean Harris hip score was 89 points at final follow-up. Thigh pain was reported in 22 hips (25%). The mean annual polyethylene wear was 0.182 ± 0.03 mm. There were 75 acetabular (85%) and 40 femoral (45%) osteolysis. The rate of survival after 28.4 years as the end point of revision was 66% for the acetabular component and 90% for the femoral component.     

The Effect of Size for a Hydroxyapatite-Coated Cementless Implant on Component Revision in Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 41,265 Stems

BackgroundThe cementless Corail is one of the most commonly used stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to investigate whether there was a difference in revision rate for smaller stems.MethodsAll primary THA procedures recorded by the Australian Joint Replacement Registry from September 1999 to December 2017 performed for osteoarthritis using the Corail stem, a cementless acetabular cup, modern bearing surfaces (ceramic/ceramic, ceramic/cross-linked polyethylene, and metal/cross-linked polyethylene), and 28 mm, 32 mm, and 36 mm head sizes were included. The primary outcome measure was femoral component revision. Data were analyzed and adjusted for age, gender, and head size. Further analysis investigated the effects of surgical approach.ResultsThere was 41,265 primary THAs recorded. The cumulative percent revision (CPR) at 13 years was 7.7% (5.5, 10.7) for stem sizes 8 and 9 and 3.0% (2.4, 3.8) for sizes 10-20 (P < .001). When adjusted for age and gender, the sizes 8 and 9 collared (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.22 [3.84-10.06], P < .001) and collarless (HR: 3.28 [2.41-4.45], P < .001) had a higher CPR than the collared and collarless size 10-20. The size 8 and 9 stems performed with an anterior approach had the highest CPR (HR: 14.44 [6.21-33.56], P < .001). The main reason for revision of size 8 and 9 femoral stems was loosening (65.2%, compared to 31.5% for 10-20 femoral stems).ConclusionsSmaller Corail stems have 4 times the rate of revision compared with the larger femoral sizes with loosening being the most common diagnosis. This is most evident when using an anterior approach.     

A Modular Head-Neck Adapter System and Ceramic Heads in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Registry Study on 354 Implants

BackgroundFive- to 10-year outcomes of a modular head-neck adapter system with ceramic heads in revision hip arthroplasty on large populations are still lacking. A registry study about modular adapter system with Delta ceramic head in revisions was designed, aiming to assess (1) the survival rates of the device, (2) the reasons for re-revisions of the device, and (3) a comparison to factory assembled titanium sleeve and Delta head cohort in revision hips.MethodsUsing a regional arthroplasty registry, we investigated the modular adapter system with a ceramic head in revision hips. Demographics, implant features, and reasons for revision were recorded. Survival rates and reasons for re-revision were assessed. The modular adapter system with the ceramic ball was compared to a factory-assembled ceramic titanium-sleeved head in revisions, acting as a control group. There were 354 revisions included at a mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 0 to 13).ResultsThe 5- and 7-year survival rates were 87.9% and 86.9%, respectively. Dislocations (2.8%) and cup aseptic loosening (4.2%) were the 2 most frequent reasons for re-revision. No breakage of the adapter system or the ceramic head occurred. A femoral neck failed (0.3%). No implant features, offset (P = .088) or skirted (P = .870) tapers, impacted on failures. No differences between the 2 cohorts were found regarding survival rates (P = .696) and reasons for re-revision (dislocations, P = .983; cup aseptic loosening, P = .296).ConclusionThe modular head neck adapter system with a ceramic head seems to be a valid option in revisions at 5 and 7 years, without additional risk of implant breakage in this registry.     

Large Diameter Metal on Metal Articulations. Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

The use of large diameter metal bearing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) increased in popularity in the last decade. More recent literature has highlighted the effect of head size in patient outcomes. Data was obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOA-NJRR) to evaluate the Birmingham (MoM) bearing surface when used with THA and HRA. There is no difference in the overall rate of revision between the THA and HRA but head size has a significant effect on revision rate. The data show that small diameter metal bearings in HRA (below 50 mm) have a higher rate of revision than large diameter metal bearings in HRA (equal to and above 50 mm) (P < .001). Conversely the large diameter metal bearings in THA have a higher rate of revision than the small diameter metal bearings in THA (P = .027). The revision rate for large diameter HRA compared to small diameter THA is not significantly different P = .670. We recommend caution when choosing either a large diameter (≥ 50 mm) metal on metal THA or small diameter (< 50 mm) HRA.     

Total Hip Replacement with a Trunnion Bearing Prosthesis: Biomechanical Principles and Preliminary Clinical Results

The biomechanics are presented of a bushing principle forming the basis for a trunnion bearing prosthesis in total hip replacement. The femoral stem is equipped with a trunnion on to which a cylindrical plastic sleeve is applied. On top of this a metal casing is placed which forms the femoral head. On flexion-extension this remains stationary in the acetabular cup and motion occurs between the trunnion and the cylindrical sleeve. Friction between head and cup is reduced to a minimum, decreasing the risk of loosening.

A follow-up study of 61 hips replaced by the trunnion bearing prosthesis was performed 2.5 years postoperatively. Eighty-eight per cent were considerably improved. There was one deep infection and two femoral stem loosenings.     

Cementation of a Dual Mobility Cup Into an Existing Well-Fixed Metal Shell: A Reliable Option to Manage Wear-Related Recurrent Dislocation in Patients With High Surgical Risk

BackgroundDuring revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the “double-socket” technique has been proposed as a straightforward solution in order to reduce the overall perioperative morbidity in patients with high surgical risk. However, the option of cementing a dual mobility cup into an existing well-fixed metal shell was sparsely reported. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the outcome of a “double-socket” technique performed with a cemented dual mobility cup in revision THA for late instability.MethodsTwenty-eight revision THAs (28 patients) were performed for wear-related recurrent dislocation using a “double-socket” technique with a cemented dual mobility cup and retrospectively reviewed. The age at revision averaged 82 years (range 74-93). According to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, 12 patients (43%) were ASA II and 16 patients (57%) were ASA III before revision.ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 3.5 years (range 2-5), the mean preoperative to postoperative functional outcome improved significantly (P < .01). The mean operative time was 107 minutes (range 75-140). The mean intraoperative bleeding was 200 mL (range 110-420). No postoperative complication, reoperation, or re-revision was reported. Importantly, no dislocation, dissociation of the cemented dual mobility cup construct, or aseptic loosening of the retained metal shell was observed.ConclusionThe “double-socket” technique with a dual mobility cup cemented into an existing well-fixed and well-positioned metal shell ensured a straightforward and blood-sparing revision technique that was efficient to restore stability and provide a secure acetabular construct in frail patients with high surgical risk and/or older than their natural life expectancy.     

Cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study

Sixty-seven patients (78 hips) who were younger than 50 years underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty using a porous-coated acetabular cup, an alumina liner, a 28-mm alumina head, and a proximally porous-coated femoral stem. One patient (1 hip) died and 2 patients (3 hips) were lost to follow-up. The remaining 64 patients (74 hips) were followed for 5 to 6 years. Their mean age at the index operation was 37 years. The mean Harris hip score was 94 points at the time of final follow-up. Four patients (4 hips) had mild thigh pain. All acetabular and femoral components were bone-ingrown, and neither pelvic nor femoral osteolysis was identified. No fracture of the ceramic liner or head was identified. Wear of the ceramic components was undetectable in 27 hips in which measurement was possible.     

Periacetabular Bone Mineral Density Changes After Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled DEXA Study

A randomized controlled trial was performed to evaluate acetabular bone mineral density (BMD) changes after hip resurfacing (RHA) versus an established conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 71 patients were allocated randomly to receive either an RHA press-fit cobalt–chromium cup (n = 38) or a THA with a threaded titanium cup and polyethylene-metal-inlay insert (n = 33). The BMD in five separate periacetabular regions of interest (ROI) was prospectively quantified preoperative until 24 months. We conclude that, in contrast to our hypothesis, periacetabular BMD was better preserved after RHA than after placement of a conventional THA. Long term follow-up studies are necessary to see whether this benefit in bone preservation sustains over longer time periods and whether it is turned into clinical benefits at future revision surgery.     

Autogenous Impaction Grafting in Total Hip Arthroplasty with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Autogenous impaction grafting was performed to improve acetabular cup coverage in 68 patients (78 hips) with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) after total hip arthroplasty, and the patients were then monitored for a mean duration of 5.5 years. No cup revisions were required, and there was no radiographic loosening. The host–graft interface became indistinct by 6 weeks after surgery, trabecular bone formation was seen by 12 weeks, and definite trabecular reorientation was seen by 20 months. At the last follow-up examination, the mean cup coverage was 97.7%, whereas mean coverage by bone grafting was 27.9%. Among 12 patients with most of the bone graft placed at the absolutely protruded area of the cup, the cup coverage provided by the bone graft decreased from 95.4% immediately after surgery to 20.7% by the final follow-up examination. Bone-particle grafting can provide a satisfactory integration speed and a low incidence of displacement and ectopic ossification.     

Does Revision of an Acetabular Shell With Insertion of an Uncemented Constrained Liner Confer Benefit Over Cementing Into a Well-Ingrown Shell?

BackgroundDuring revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), a constrained acetabular liner (CAL) may be inserted to enhance hip stability. It is unclear, however, whether cementation of a CAL into a retained cup offers an advantage compared to revision of the acetabular cup and insertion of an uncemented CAL. The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes and survivorship between the 2 methods.MethodsWe identified a total of 177 patients who underwent revision THA with a specific CAL at our center between July 2004 and May 2019 (114 cup revisions and insertion of an uncemented CAL, 63 cementations of a CAL into a retained cup). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis was performed for implant survival free from aseptic failure of the CAL for both cohorts.ResultsThe average follow-up time was 7.2 and 7.02 years for the cemented and uncemented cohort, respectively (P = .55). Five patients (7.93%) in the cemented CAL group experienced failure of the CAL, whereas 10 patients (8.77%) in the uncemented CAL cohort experienced failure (P = .21). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis demonstrated comparable survivorship at 10 years (P = .055).ConclusionThe results of our study suggest comparable survivorship between cementing a CAL into a retained cup and inserting an uncemented CAL in a revised acetabular cup. As a result of these findings along with the benefits associated with cementing a CAL, we encourage surgeons to readily consider this option in the management of recurrent instability.     

Minimum 20-Year Follow-Up Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Improved Cementing Technique

A consecutive, non-selective cohort of 83 (77 patients) cemented total hip arthroplasty revisions using contemporary cementing techniques was analyzed at a minimum of 20 years following the index procedure. No patients were lost to follow-up. The average age at revision was 62.4 years (23 to 89). Twenty-two hips (26.5%) had had a reoperation, eighteen (21.7%) for aseptic loosening, 3 (3.6%) for femoral prosthesis fracture and 1 (1.2%) for dislocation. The incidence of re-revision for aseptic femoral loosening was 7.5% and for aseptic acetabular loosening was 21.7%. These results confirm that cemented femoral revision using improved cementing techniques is a durable option in revision hip surgery. In contrast to this, THA revisions using a cemented acetabular component have been less durable at this length of follow-up.