Selective Patella Resurfacing in Contemporary Cruciate Retaining and Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BackgroundLeaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing due to modern patella-friendly implants, awareness that complications are not uncommon with resurfacing, and knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study examined the effect of selective patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern implants and techniques in cohorts rigorously matched for demographics and osteoarthritis severity.MethodsA total of 166 TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were case-control matched to 166 TKAs with patella resurfacing. Case-control matching was based on demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, comorbidities, and osteoarthritis severity. No significant differences were observed between cohorts for demographics (P ≥ .347), comorbidities (P ≥ .443), or radiographic osteoarthritis severity (P ≥ .078). Radiographic alignment and prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at latest clinical follow-up.ResultsPreoperatively, patellar tilt was less for the unresurfaced patella group (3 versus 4°, P = .003); however, postoperative patellar tilt was not different (3 versus 3°, P = .225). At a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range, 1 to 7), University of California Los Angeles Activity Level was significantly higher for the unresurfaced patella group (6.3 versus 5.5, P = .002), but the mean group difference did not reach a minimal clinically important difference. There were no other significant differences in PROMs or reoperation rates between cohorts (P ≥ .135).ConclusionIn contemporary cruciate retaining and substituting TKA designs, not resurfacing the patella in select patients may achieve comparable PROMs and re-operation rates; and potentially greater activity level compared to patella resurfacing at early follow-up.Level of EvidenceIII.     

旋转平台与固定平台全膝关节置换术的对比研究及髌骨置换与否对疗效的影响

目的评估旋转平台和固定平台假体全膝关节置换(TKA)两型假体间的疗效有无差异及髌骨置换与否对疗效的影响。方法选取同一医师施行的78侧初次TKA进行回顾。术前诊断包括骨关节炎、类风湿性关节炎等。施行固定平台TKA手术的患者共30侧,14侧置换髌骨;施行旋转平台TKA手术的共48侧,36侧置换髌骨。术前和术后随访行膝HSS评分、测量关节伸直角度和屈曲角度,以比较两型假体TKA疗效;比较髌骨置换组与未置换组TKA疗效;在髌骨置换组与未置换组中,分别比较固定平台TKA和旋转平台TKA的疗效。结果成功随访76侧,平均25.2个月。旋转平台组术后HSS评分、伸直角度与固定平台组间的差异无统计学意义,前者术后的屈曲角度(112.0±11.5)°优于固定平台组间的差异有统计学意义(t=3.270,P0.01)。髌骨未置换组术后HSS评分、伸直角度与髌骨置换组(102.5±15.1)°组间差异有统计学意义(t=2.469,P0.05;t=3.747,P0.01),术后屈曲角度与后者间的差别无统计学意义。髌骨未置换组中,旋转平台TKA与固定平台TKA的术后HSS评分、屈曲角度无差异,伸直角度差别无临床意义。髌骨置换组中,旋转平台TKA术后HSS评分、伸直角度与固定平台TKA间的差异无统计学意义,前者术后的屈曲角度(112.9±13.0)°与后者术后的屈曲角度(96.7±18.4)°比较差异有统计学意义(t=2.838,P0.05)。结论旋转平台假体与固定平台假体TKA术后总体疗效相似,旋转平台假体能够更好地改善关节屈曲角度;置换髌骨并不能更好地改善膝关节功能。     

Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty

Sagittal plane patellofemoral kinematics was determined for 81 subjects while performing a weight-bearing deep knee bend under fluoroscopic surveillance. Fourteen normal knees, 12 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees, and 55 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were assessed. Of TKAs, 39 had resurfacing with a dome-shaped patella, 8 had resurfacing with an anatomic mobile-bearing patella, and 8 were unresurfaced. TKA patellae experienced more superior patellofemoral contact and higher patellar tilt angles compared with the normal knees and ACL-deficient knees (P <.05). Patellofemoral separation at 5 degrees (+/-3 degrees ) extension was seen in 86% cruciate-retaining and 44% cruciate-stabilized TKAs and 8% ACL-deficient knees but not in the normal knees or mobile-bearing TKAs (P <.05). The patellar kinematic patterns for subjects having a TKA were more variable than subjects having either a normal knee or an ACL-deficient knee. Kinematic abnormalities of the prosthetic patellofemoral joint may reduce the effective extensor moment after TKA.     

The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BackgroundPatellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue after more than 4 decades of TKA. Despite a growing body of evidence from registry data, resurfacing is still based largely on a surgeon’s preference and training. The purpose of this study is to provide long-term outcomes for patellar resurfaced compared to when the patella is not resurfaced.MethodsData from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (1999-2017) were used for this study. The analysis included 570,735 primary TKAs undertaken for osteoarthritis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 17-year cumulative percent revision rates were used to compare revision rates between 4 subgroups: minimally stabilized (MS) patellar resurfacing, posterior stabilized (PS) patellar resurfacing, MS unresurfaced, and PS unresurfaced patella. Additional analyses of the patellar implant type and a comparison of inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing were also performed.ResultsFor all primary TKA, procedures where the patella was not resurfaced have a higher rate of revision compared to procedures where the patella was resurfaced (HR, 1.31; confidence interval, 1.28-1.35; P < .001). Unresurfaced PS knees have the highest cumulative percent revision at 17 years (11.1%), followed by MS unresurfaced (8.8%), PS resurfaced (7.9%), and MS resurfaced (7.1%). Inlay patellar resurfacing has a higher rate of revision compared to onlay patellar resurfacing (HR, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.17-1.37; P < .001).ConclusionResurfacing the patella reduces the rate of revision for both MS and PS knees. MS knees with patellar resurfacing have the lowest rate of revision. Onlay patella designs are associated with a lower revision rate compared to inlay patella designs.     

Routine Patellar Resurfacing During Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Cost-Effective in Patients Without Patellar Arthritis

BackgroundCurrently, the decision to resurface the patella is often made irrespective of the presence of patellar arthritis. The purpose of this study is to utilize the existing literature to assess cost-utility of routinely vs selectively resurfacing the patella.MethodsProspective randomized studies of patella resurfacing vs non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were identified through literature review. Data from these studies represented probabilities of varied outcomes following TKA dependent upon patella resurfacing. Using previously validated utility scores from the McKnee modified Health Utilities Index, endpoint utility values were provided for each potential outcome.ResultsLiterature review yielded a total of 14 studies with 3,562 patients receiving 3,823 TKAs, of which 1,873 (49.0%) patellae were resurfaced. Persistent postoperative anterior knee pain occurred in 20.9% vs 13.2% (P < .001) and patella reoperation was performed in 3.7% vs 1.6% (P < .001) of unresurfaced and resurfaced patella, respectively. In studies excluding those with arthritic patellae, the incidence of anterior knee pain was equivalent between groups and reoperation decreased to 1.2% vs 0% (P = .06). Patella resurfacing provided marginally improved quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) for both selective and indiscriminate patella resurfacing. When including all studies, the incremental cost per QALY was $3,032. However, when analyzing only those studies with nonarthritic patellae, the incremental cost per QALY to resurface the patella increased to $183,584.ConclusionPatellar resurfacing remains a controversial issue in TKA. Utilizing data from new prospective randomized studies, this analysis finds that routinely resurfacing arthritis-free patellae in TKA are not cost-effective.     

Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Controversies existing over resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty remain in the literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published randomised clinical trials relevant to patellar resurfacing. The relative risk of reoperation was significantly lower for the patellar resurfacing group than for the nonresurfacing group (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38–0.84, P = 0.004). The overall incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain of the 1,421 knees included was 12.9% in the patellar resurfacing group and 24.1% in the nonresurfacing group. The existing evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing can reduce the risk of reoperation with no improvement in postoperative knee function or patient satisfaction over total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Whether it can decrease the incidence of anterior knee pain remains uncertain.     

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty leads to better isokinetic performance

BackgroundFor decades there have been concerns about patellar resurfacing (PR) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the individual preference of the surgeon is still the main determinant of whether or not resurfacing is applied. According to preference, surgeons can be categorized in 3 main groups of those who usually, selectively, or rarely resurface. The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled study was to compare the isokinetic performance and clinical outcome of TKAs with PR and without PR.MethodsA total of 50 patients scheduled to undergo TKA for primary osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned to either the PR or non-PR groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect of age, BMI, gender and preoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) and isokinetic performance. Patients were evaluated at postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months with KSS and at 6 months and 1 year with isokinetic measurements.ResultsThe PR group had a higher mean score, especially in the functional component of KSS, but the difference was not statistically significant. Knee extension peak torque was significantly higher in the PR group at 6 months (p = 0.029) and 1 year (p = 0.004) postoperatively. There were no significant differences between the groups in respect of knee flexion peak torque values following TKA.ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrated that PR during TKA is associated with better isokinetic performance and higher knee scores. These results support routine/usually resurfacing of the patella. For surgeons who selectively resurface the patella, the advantage of better isokinetic performance may be taking into consideration in favor of resurfacing the patella where they are undecided.Level of evidenceLevel I, therapeutic study.     

Asymmetric patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Three hundred consecutive primary, cemented, condylar total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were reviewed for the presence of asymmetric patella resurfacing using a postoperative Merchant or sunrise patellar radiograph. Twenty-one knees in 14 patients were found to have the patella asymmetrically resurfaced. Asymmetric resurfacing typically involved the inadvertent preferential resurfacing of the lateral facet with underresection of bone from the medial patellar facet. All patients underwent follow-up for a minimum of 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years. Of the 21 knees, 3 revisions were required for patellar complications. One patellar component was loose on radiographs and there was marked patellofemoral pain in 6 knees. Overall, 11 of 21 knees (52%) underwent revision or were recommended for revision for patellar complications or had anterior knee pain that limited activities. Inadvertent asymmetric patella resurfacing using the kinematic condylar implant adversely affects the outcome after TKA.     

Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study

The purpose of this study was to compare unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and more specifically to evaluate the role of the patella in patient preference between UKA and TKA. A group of 23 patients were chosen, each with a UKA in one knee and a TKA in the opposite knee. As a subset of the group, 13 patients were compared who had not had patellar resurfacing on their TKA side (Group A) versus ten patients who had patellar resurfacing (Group B). Each patient had a UKA and TKA performed during the same hospitalization. Each patient's resurfacing was performed by the same surgical team. Moreover, inpatient care and physical therapy for each patient's respective UKA and TKA were the same. Patient evaluation consisted of chart review, joint registry data, and telephone interviews that focused on patient preference regarding pain, stability, "feel," and ability to climb stairs. The 23 patients studied had an average follow-up period of 81 months (range, 38-153 months). There were 14 men and ten women with an average age of 67 years. Preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 22 patients and rheumatoid arthritis in one patient. Range of motion (ROM) improved from a preoperative mean of 106 degrees to 123 degrees postoperatively on the UKA side. Mean ROM for the Group A TKAs improved from 104 degrees to 109 degrees, whereas the Group B TKAs remained unchanged at 113 degrees. For patients surveyed in Group A, 31% stated that their UKA knee was their better knee overall, 15% stated that their TKA knee was their better knee overall, and 54% could find no difference.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of Total Knee Prosthesis Design on Patellar Tracking and Need for Lateral Retinacular Release

Intraoperative lateral retinacular release (LRR) during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is discouraged, except when LRR is necessary to centralize patellofemoral tracking. This study compares the LRR rates in four designs of total knee implants and correlates how changes in prosthesis design affect LRR rates. 2881 primary TKAs performed by one surgeon using a single surgical technique were reviewed. After controlling for all variables, LRR rates dropped from 71.6% to 19.5% to 9.7% to 2.7% with each design change (P < .0001). Differences in varus/valgus alignment and male/female proportions were compared in each group and the differences did not correlate with LRR rates. This study concludes that changes and improvements in knee implant designs play a significant role in decreasing lateral retinacular release rates in TKA.     

Variation of Medicare Payments for Total Knee Arthroplasty

We analyzed the 2009 Medicare inpatient claims data and other databases to estimate Medicare payments for primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The average Medicare hospital payment per procedure was $13,464 for primary TKA (n = 227,587) and $17,331 for revision TKA (n = 18,677). For both primary and revision TKAs Medicare payments varied substantially across patients, hospitals and healthcare markets. Less than one percent of primary TKA cases but seven percent of revision TKA cases triggered Medicare “outlier” payments, which were $10,000 or higher per case beyond regular diagnosis-related-group payments. Urban and major teaching hospitals were more likely to treat these unusually expensive cases. Hospitals in the Northeast and West regions tended to receive higher Medicare payments than hospitals in the Midwest.     

Patella resurfacing: no benefit for the long-term outcome of total knee arthroplasty. A 10- to 16.3-year follow-up

A follow-up of more than 10 years among patients who have undergone a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was performed to determine the significance of patella resurfacing for the long-term outcome. The clinical outcome was assessed by the Knee Society Score (KSS), and the radiological outcome was determined based on the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation System. The patella was preserved in 21 knees and resurfaced in 44 knees. The mean follow-up time was 11.6 years (range 10-16.3 years). There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome between the knees with patella resurfacing (knee points: mean 85.3 +/-12.9, function points: mean 70.3 +/- 23.4) and the knees with patella retention (knee points: mean 82.7 +/- 16.2, function points: mean 71.7 +/- 22.4; p = 0.58 for knee, and p = 0.83 for function points). There was also no significant difference in the radiological outcomes regarding the angles alpha, beta, Upsilon, delta, and valgus ( p > 0.05 for each variable). There was, however, a trend towards more lucencies in TKAs with a resurfaced patella on the tibia side in the anteroposterior view ( p = 0.052). Patellar complications were found more often in the resurfaced group (20.5%) than in the group without resurfacing (9.6%). The results indicate overall no advantage of patella resurfacing compared with patella retention in the long run.     

In Vivo Kinematic Comparison Between Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty During Step-Up Activity

Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) expects high conformity and low contact stress. It is designed to correct the rotational mismatch between femoral and tibial components. We examined the difference in weight-bearing knee kinematics in patients with mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing TKA performing step-up activities. We randomly assigned 40 knees (37 patients) to mobile-bearing TKA (n = 20) or fixed-bearing TKA (n = 20). Using fluoroscopic imaging we evaluated knee kinematics during step-up activity one year after surgery. The total extent of rotation was not different for the two TKAs. Due to the axial rotation of the polyethylene insert, patients with mobile-bearing TKA had a wider range of absolute axial rotation. The position of the medial and the lateral condyles was significantly more posterior in the fixed-bearing TKA. There were only minor kinematic differences between the two TKAs. The polyethylene insert in the mobile-bearing TKA moved as designed especially with respect to the self-alignment feature.     

Total Knee Arthroplasty After Lower Extremity Amputation: A Review of 13 Cases

Below knee amputation protects the ipsilateral knee from osteoarthritis and overloads the contralateral knee predisposing it to symptomatic osteoarthritis. We retrospectively reviewed 13 primary total knee arthroplasty (TKAs) in 12 patients with a prior lower extremity amputation. Twelve TKAs were performed on the contralateral side of the amputated limb while only one TKA was performed on the ipsilateral side. The average clinical follow-up was 6.8 ± 4.8 years. Knee Society Scores improved from 30.4 ± 11.8 to 88.5 ± 4.2 after TKA with a prior contralateral amputation. Three (23.1%) patients with TKA after contralateral amputation had aseptic loosening of the tibial component. Patients experience clinically significant improvement with TKA after lower extremity amputation. Augmentation of tibial fixation with a stem may be advisable during TKA after contralateral amputation.     

Finite Element Analysis of Resurfacing Depth and Obliquity on Patella Stress and Stability in TKA

Patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduces postoperative complications and revisions; however, the optimal cutting depth and angle that minimize patellar strain and fracture remain unclear. We performed three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) of resurfacing cutting depth and obliquity to assess the stresses in each component of the knee joint, and fatigue testing to determine cyclic loading conditions over the expected life span of the implant. Maximum stress on the patella increased as cutting depth increased up to 8 mm; peak stresses on the idealized button further increased at 10-mm depth. Medial superior obliquities below 3° showed the lowest stress on the patella and button and the highest fatigue life. An oblique cut of 3° with respect to the inferior end increased patellar stress and reduced fatigue life, making this the least successful approach. Taken together, our FEA supports the use of minimal cutting depths at − 3° with respect to the superior end for patellar resurfacing in TKA in order to minimize stresses in the structure and improve TKA durability. Future studies will assess the effect of patella button placement to account for real-world practice variations.     

Differences in patellofemoral contact stresses between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a dynamic in vitro measurement

Introduction  Anterior knee pain is one of the most common problems after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mobile-bearing designs should improve patella tracking with a reduced rate of patella tilt as well as reduced patellofemoral contact stresses and improve knee flexion. The aim of this dynamic in vitro investigation was to evaluate the changes of patellofemoral contact stresses after TKA using fixed and mobile-bearing designs. Materials and methods  Seven knee specimens were mounted into a knee simulator imitating an isokinetic extension of the knee. The patellofemoral contact was measured before and after tricompartimental TKA with fixed and mobile-bearing designs using pressure-sensitive films. Contact stresses were measured from 120° knee flexion to full extension with a simulated force of the quadriceps muscle up to 1,200 N. Additionally all measurements were performed with simulated co-contraction of the hamstrings muscles. Results  Fixed-bearing TKA increases patellofemoral contact stresses compared to physiologic conditions. After patella resurfacing, contact stresses increase even more. By changing the prosthesis design to mobile bearing, maximum contact stress was measured to be punctual higher than in fixed-bearing implants. In the interval between 0°–30° and 70°–105° of flexion, obviously lower pressures were evaluated for the mobile-bearing design. With cocontraction of the hamstrings, a lower contact stress of the mobile-bearing design was evident for the complete measurement of the knee extension. Conclusion  An increase of patellofemoral contact stresses after patellar resurfacing in TKA could be demonstrated. This outcome implicates a higher risk of patellofemoral complications. The mobile-bearing design showed evidently lower patellofemoral contact stresses than the fixed-bearing design.     

Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum of 5-Year Follow-up of 200 Patients in a Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial

In the literature, studies of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after mid-term period are not conclusive and long-term data are rare. In a prospective, randomized, comparative study 100 conventional TKAs (group REG) were compared with 100 computer-assisted TKAs (group NAV). Minimum follow-up was 5 years. No difference in implant failure was found with 1.1% in group NAV versus 4.6% in group REG (P = 0.368). Group NAV showed a significantly less mean deviation of mechanical limb axis (P = 0.015), more TKAs (90% versus 81% in group REG) were within 3° varus/valgus and a higher tibial slope and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) accuracy was found (P ≤ 0.034). Clinical investigational parameters showed no differences (P ≥ 0.058). Insall and HSS score total were also higher in group NAV (P ≤ 0.016).     

Can Enoxaparin Reduce Thromboembolism Related Events After Primary TKA In Asian Patients?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in preventing venous and arterial thromboembolism related events after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Asian patients. Four hundred twenty nine patients (621 TKAs) did not receive thromboprophylaxis after TKA and 907 patients (1,336 TKAs) received enoxaparin after the procedure. We assessed clinically significant venous and arterial thromboembolism related events and bleeding complications. Total thromboembolism related events occurred in 13 patients (3.03%) without thromboprophylaxis and 17 patients (1.87%) with enoxaparin (P = 0.183). Our study showed that the incidence of clinically significant thromboembolism related events after TKA was very low in Asian patients. Enoxaparin had no benefits in reducing thromboembolism related events in Asian patients.     

Outcomes of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a 9-year experience based on a case series of scorpio PS knees

Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an actively debated issue. This prospective study addresses fundamental questions regarding whether to resurface the patella. To do this, we compared clinical results of Scorpio PS knees with and without patellar resurfacing to determine whether there was any statistically significant difference in survivorship, function, pain, and radiographic analyses. Our study failed to demonstrate any statistical difference between the 2 groups (resurfaced versus nonresurfaced) according to knee pain, walking abilities, stair climbing, range of motion, and radiologic findings, as well as cross-correlations between patellar pain and age, gender, obesity, or etiology. Our radiologic findings did not reveal any failures of bony structures facing the metallic flange. Some knee designs can thus be seen as "patella friendly." Given the significant cost of patella resurfacing and the resulting well-known complications, we continue to avoid systematic resurfacing of the patella during Scorpio TKA.     

Age and Prosthetic Design as Risk Factors for Secondary Patella Resurfacing

BackgroundSelectively resurfacing the patella based on a patient’s risk of secondary patella resurfacing (SPR) may be the optimal strategy for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, exactly which factors increase the risk of SPR is unknown. Utilizing New Zealand Joint Registry data, we investigated the following: (1) What patient and surgical factors are more prevalent among TKA patients who received SPR compared to those who did not? and (2) What is the difference in Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) between those who receive SPR and those who do not?MethodsPrevalence of various patient and surgical factors was compared between 197 non-resurfaced TKAs that proceeded to SPR and 31,399 that did not. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the odds ratio for each factor that differed between groups. Six-month postoperative OKS for each group was utilized for comparison.ResultsPosterior-stabilized designs had an odds ratio of 1.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.66; P = .001) when compared to cruciate-retaining designs. When compared to age less than 55, age >75 and age 65-74 had odds ratios of 0.27 (95% CI 0.16-0.46; P < .001) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.28-0.69; P < .001) respectively. Six-month OKS was lower among those who received SPR (37.27 vs 27.26; P < .001).ConclusionYounger age, posterior-stabilized design, and a low 6-month OKS were associated with SPR.