前哨淋巴结活检术在结直肠癌中的应用研究(英文)

Objective:The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) in colorectal cancer.Methods:Twenty patients of colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study.Endoscopic injection submucosally of 99mTc-DX was performed around the primary tumor 3 h before operation.Immediately after laparotomy, methylene blue was injected into subserosal layer adjacent to the tumor.Sentinel lymph nodes(SLNs) were defined as blue stained nodes or(and) those containing 10 times more radioa...     

The role of preoperative ultrasound scan in detecting lymph node metastasis before sentinel node biopsy in melanoma patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative ultrasound (US) scanning in identifying lymph node metastasis before sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we conducted a prospective study on 125 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma (CM). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 125 patients with >1 mm thick CM and candidate for SNB. Preoperatively, patients underwent US scanning of regional lymphatic basins and FNA of suspected lymph nodes (LN). All patients underwent lymphatic mapping and SNB. RESULTS: Combined with fine-needle aspirate (FNA) of suspect LN, US scan allowed the correct preoperative detection of 12 out of 31 histologically positive lymphatic basins, specificity and sensitivity being 100 and 39%, respectively. The false negative rate (61%) was mainly linked to tumor deposits less than 2 mm in diameter, which can be considered the current spatial resolution limit of this technique. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative US scan could reduce the number of SNB, thus avoiding the stress of this surgical procedure in approximately 10% of patients and reducing health care costs. As a non-invasive and relatively inexpensive technique, lymph node US scan can be part of the preoperative staging process of patients' candidate for SNB in order to avoid unnecessary surgical procedures.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检研究进展

近年来,乳腺癌的发病率越来越高,乳腺癌治疗方式也在不断改进,但手术仍然是早期乳腺癌治疗的主要手段。对于早期乳腺癌,前哨淋巴结活检术（sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB）是一种安全、精确的手术方式,已逐渐替代腋窝淋巴结清扫术（axillary lymph node dissection,ALND）成为早期乳腺癌治疗的标准术式。随着研究的深入,SLNB的应用范围更广,术后生活质量显著改善,但其操作尚需要进一步统一规范。在前哨淋巴结微转移、宏转移、前哨淋巴结活检阳性的老年患者以及新辅助化疗的前哨淋巴结活检等方面尚未达成共识,还需要更多大型多中心前瞻性的随机试验来进一步论证。     

前哨淋巴结活检术在早期乳腺癌保乳术中的应用

目的探讨前哨淋巴结活检术（sentinellymph node biopsy,SLNB）在早期乳腺癌保乳术中的应用效果。方法回顾性分析56例pT1.2N0M0期乳腺癌行保乳术＋前哨淋巴结活检术的临床资料。56例SLN阴性,未行腋窝淋巴结清扫术（axillary lymph node dissection,ALND）。术后辅以化疗、放疗,激素受体阳性患者行内分泌治疗。结果56例成功施行保乳手术,保乳术后双乳对称。SLNB替代ALND者各项术后并发症少。中位随访时间36个月（1～72个月）,1例发现局部复发,行乳腺癌改良根治术时发现腋窝淋巴结转移;1例发现腋窝淋巴结复发转移。结论SLNB可以缩小手术范围,减少术后并发症,保留腋窝形态,提高保乳质量。     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的研究进展

前哨淋巴结活检（SLNB）是本世纪继早期乳腺癌保乳治疗后第二个最重要的进展,前哨淋巴结活检是种多学科结合的新方法,比腋窝淋巴结清扫更能准确的进行腋窝分期,乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检很快运用到临床实践。适当选择病人,由有经验的多学科团队进行前哨淋巴结活检,其精确度超过95％,前哨淋巴结活检广泛应用在可触及的和不可触及的T1和T2的肿瘤病人。最近研究表明,前哨淋巴结活检技术可应用在多中心多病灶的和新辅助化疗后和局部晚期乳腺癌病人。前哨淋巴结活检的重要因素包括注射技术,病例选择,病理分析和活检精确度等,为此简要综述如下。     

前哨淋巴结活检在胃癌根治术中的应用

目的：探讨前哨淋巴结活检（SLNB）在胃癌根治术中临床应用的可行性及其价值。方法：应用美蓝对55例胃癌患者行SLN定位活检,分体内、体外组,采用HE染色病理检查法、CK20免疫组化染色检测SLN中转移癌。结果：共检出淋巴结560枚,其中SLN 262枚,检出率85.7%。免疫组化学法检测SLN癌转移的敏感性明显高于HE染色,而假阴性明显低于后者（P〈0.05）。结论：胃癌根治术中行前哨淋巴结活检技术,具有切实的可行性,能够预测区域淋巴结的转移状况;通过IHC法检查有助于明确胃癌的病理分期,有利于判断预后和个体化治疗方案的制定。     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的安全性

循证医学Ⅰ、Ⅱ级证据支持乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检（SLNB）的安全性。本文就SLNB对腋窝淋巴结的准确分期、前哨淋巴结阴性患者SLNB替代腋清扫术后腋窝复发率和并发症、SLNB的放射安全性、SLNB新的适应症进行讨论。     

Desmoplastic melanoma: A 12-year experience with sentinel lymph node biopsy

Aims

Given the paucity of data regarding nodal involvement in desmoplastic melanoma (DM), we decided to review the incidence of nodal metastasis in our patients with DM to better define guidelines regarding the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in this specific melanoma subtype.

Methods

Using a prospectively maintained database, we reviewed all patients who underwent treatment for melanoma at the Yale Melanoma Unit in a twelve-year period (1998–2010), during which 3531 cases were treated. We identified 24 patients (0.7%) diagnosed with DM. These patients' records were studied for clinical and histologic parameters and clinical outcomes.

Results

Twenty-two patients from the DM group had SLNB, of which four (18%) were diagnosed with micro-metastasis. These four patients were all treated with completion lymphadenectomy and none had additional positive nodes in the remainder of the nodes. Patients were followed after surgery for a median of 25 months (range 2–60 months). Two patients (9%) developed local recurrence, two (9%) in-transit recurrence, and six (27%) showed distant metastases (three patients were pure DM and three patients showed mixed morphology). Patients with mixed DM had a higher rate of nodal metastasis (25%) vs those with pure DM (14%).

Conclusions

Other authors have reported that patients diagnosed with pure DM were less likely to have a positive SLN (0–2%) than those patients with the mixed DM subtype (12–16%). Our findings of higher incidence rates of regional lymph node metastases in both the pure and mixed DM subtypes (14% and 25%) compel us to continue to still recommend that SLNB be considered in patients with both subcategories, pure and mixed DM.

Level of evidence

Level IV.     

Efficacy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is rapidly becoming the standard of care in the treatment of women with early stage breast cancer. Male breast cancer although relatively rare, has typically been treated with mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Men who develop breast carcinoma have the same risk as their female counterparts of developing the morbidities associated with axillary dissection. SLNB has been championed as a procedure aimed at preventing those morbidities. We recently have evaluated the role of SLNB in the treatment of men with early stage breast cancer. METHODS: Among the 18 men treated at the University of Michigan Medical Center for breast cancer from May 1998 to November 2002, 6 were treated with SLNB. RESULTS: The mean tumor size was 1.6 cm. The mean patient age was 59.8 years. All of the patients had one or more sentinel lymph nodes identified. Two of the six did not have confirmatory axillary dissection. Three of the six had positive sentinel lymph nodes (50%). Only one of the three patients with a positive sentinel node had more nodes positive. One of the six patients had a positive node on frozen section and underwent immediate complete axillary dissection. This patient had no additional positive nodes. No patients in our series had immunohistochemical studies of the lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Men with early stage breast carcinoma may be offered the management option of SLNB since in the hands of experienced surgeons it has a success rate apparently equal to that in their female counterparts.     

早期子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结活检和淋巴结微转移的研究进展

子宫内膜癌（endometrial cancer,EC）是妇科常见恶性肿瘤之一,近年来很多研究指出前哨淋巴结活检（sentinel lymph node biopsy,SLNB）和前哨淋巴结（sentinel lymph node,SLN）病理超分期可以明确转移淋巴结位置和判定淋巴结转移与否,并被广泛应用于妇科肿瘤。早期子宫内膜癌淋巴结转移率低,然而淋巴结转移情况是指导术后辅助治疗和预测复发的独立危险因素。SLNB与病理超分期等检测手段结合可发现更多的淋巴结转移类型,尤其对淋巴结微转移具有较好检出效果,为早期子宫内膜癌诊疗提供更多依据。本文将对近年来有关早期子宫内膜癌SLNB技术、影响SLNB准确性相关问题、淋巴结微转移问题三方面进行简述,为促进早期子宫内膜癌精准手术治疗,减少术中风险和术后并发症提供可行性方案。     

临床腋窝淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者内乳区前哨淋巴结活检术研究*

目的：评估临床腋窝淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者行内乳区前哨淋巴结活检术（IM-SLNB）的临床意义。方法：2013年6 月至2014年10月对山东省肿瘤医院乳腺病中心就诊的64例临床腋窝淋巴结阳性的原发性乳腺癌患者行前瞻性单臂入组研究,采取腋窝淋巴结清扫术,同时均应用新的核素注射技术进行IM-SLNB。结果：64例患者中内乳区前哨淋巴结（IM-SLN）显像为38例,显像率为59.4%（38/ 64）。 38例IM-SLN 显像患者中IM-SLNB 成功率为100%（38/ 38）,并发症发生率为7.9%（3/ 38）,IM-SLN 转移率为21.1%（8/ 38）。 肿瘤位于内上象限和腋窝淋巴结转移数目较多的患者,其IM-SLN 转移率较高（P < 0.001 和P = 0.017）。 患者临床获益率为59.4%（38/ 64）,其中12.5%（8/ 64）另接受了内乳区放疗、46.9%（30/ 64）避免了不必要的内乳区放疗。结论：临床腋窝淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌应进行IM-SLNB,尤其对于肿瘤位于内上象限及怀疑存在较多腋窝淋巴结转移数目的患者,以获得内乳区淋巴结的转移状态,指导乳腺癌患者内乳区放疗。     

Meta‐analysis of sentinel lymph node positivity in thin melanoma (≤1 mm)

BACKGROUND:

Despite the lack of an established survival benefit of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, this technique has been increasingly applied in the staging of thin (≤1 mm) melanoma patients, without clear evidence to support this recommendation. The authors performed a meta‐analysis to estimate the risk, potential predictors, and outcome of SLN positivity in this group of patients.

METHODS:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for rates of SLN positivity in patients with thin melanoma. The methodologic quality of included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies criteria. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q statistic, and publication bias was examined through funnel plot and the Begg and Mazumdar method. Overall SLN positivity in thin melanoma patients was estimated using the DerSimonial‐Laird random effect method.

RESULTS:

Thirty‐four studies comprising 3651 patients met inclusion criteria. The pooled SLN positivity rate was 5.6%. Significant heterogeneity among studies was detected (P = .005). There was no statistical evidence of publication bias (P = .21). Eighteen studies reported select clinical and histopathologic data limited to SLN‐positive patients (n = 113). Among the tumors from these patients, 6.1% were ulcerated, 31.5% demonstrated regression, and 47.5% were Clark level IV/V. Only 4 melanoma‐related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

Relatively few patients with thin melanoma have a positive SLN. To the authors' knowledge, there are no clinical or histopathologic criteria that can reliably identify thin melanoma patients who might benefit from this intervention. Given the increasing diagnosis of thin melanoma, in addition to the cost and potential morbidity of this procedure, alternative strategies to identify patients at risk for lymph node disease are needed. Cancer 2009. © 2008 American Cancer Society.