HIV-1 transgenic rat CD4+ T cells develop decreased CD28 responsiveness and suboptimal Lck tyrosine dephosphorylation following activation

Impaired CD4+ T cell responses, resulting in dysregulated T-helper 1 (Th1) effector and memory responses, are a common result of HIV-1 infection. These defects are often preceded by decreased expression and function of the alpha/beta T cell receptor (TCR)-CD3 complex and of co-stimulatory molecules including CD28, resulting in altered T cell proliferation, cytokine secretion and cell survival. We have previously shown that HIV Tg rats have defective development of T cell effector function and generation of specific effector/memory T cell subsets. Here we identify abnormalities in activated HIV-1 Tg rat CD4+ T cells that include decreased pY505 dephosphorylation of Lck (required for Lck activation), decreased CD28 function, reduced expression of the anti-apoptotic molecule Bcl-xL, decreased secretion of the mitogenic lympokine interleukin-2 (IL-2) and increased activation induced apoptosis. These events likely lead to defects in antigen-specific signaling and may help explain the disruption of Th1 responses and the generation of specific effector/memory subsets in transgenic CD4+ T cells.     

Protective immunity towards intracellular pathogens

Immunity towards intracellular pathogens is often dependent upon the generation of CD8(+) memory T cells, which provide long-lasting and effective protection. Over the past few years, we have gained novel insights into the heterogeneity of CD8(+) T cells, time points of lineage commitment, and lineage relationships between subpopulations. These studies suggest that memory CD8(+) T cells progressively develop from na?ve cells early during the immune response and further differentiate unidirectionally into short-living effector cells. We have also learnt that different memory subsets play distinct roles in conferring protection: whereas effector memory T cells are able to provide immediate protection but are not necessarily maintained long-term, central memory T cells have the potential for constant self-renewal. Thus, neither subset really fulfills all criteria of memory. As protective effector memory cells can develop from central memory cells, vaccination strategies should focus on induction of a balanced ratio of the two memory T cell subsets.     

Type-I IFN drives the differentiation of short-lived effector CD8+ T cells in vivo

Two subsets of CD8(+) T cells are generated early during an immune response; one of these subsets forms the memory pool, known as memory precursor effector cells (MPECs), identified by high expression of CD127 and low expression of KLRG1, whereas the other subset forms short-lived effector cells (SLECs) identified by low expression of CD127 and high expression of KLRG1. Here, we studied in vivo the role of type-I IFN in this fate decision. We found that under priming conditions dominated by type-I IFN, as observed in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection, type-I IFN signaling directly impacted the regulation of T-bet and thus the early fate decision of CD8(+) T cells. In the absence of type-I IFN signaling, CD8(+) T cells failed to form SLECs but could form MPECs that give rise to functional memory CD8(+) T cells. Together, these findings identify type-I IFN as an important factor driving SLEC differentiation and thus instructing the early division between the effector and memory precursor CD8(+) T-cell pool.     

Fish T cells: recent advances through genomics

This brief review is intended to provide a concise overview of the current literature concerning T cells, advances in identifying distinct T cell functional subsets, and in distinguishing effector cells from memory cells. We compare and contrast a wealth of recent progress made in T cell immunology of teleost, elasmobranch, and agnathan fish, to knowledge derived from mammalian T cell studies. From genome studies, fish clearly have most components associated with T cell function and we can speculate on the presence of putative T cell subsets, and the ability to detect their differentiation to form memory cells. Some recombinant proteins for T cell associated cytokines and antibodies for T cell surface receptors have been generated that will facilitate studying the functional roles of teleost T cells during immune responses. Although there is still a long way to go, major advances have occurred in recent years for investigating T cell responses, thus phenotypic and functional characterization is on the near horizon.     

Remembrance of antigens past: new insights into memory T cells

Memory immune responses against foreign antigens protect the host from pathogens previously encountered via illness or vaccination, yet can also contribute to the pathology of autoimmune disease when generated against self-antigens. Memory immune responses are classically attributed to the reactivation of long-lived, antigen-specific T lymphocytes that arise directly from differentiated effector T cells and persist in a uniformly quiescent state. Recent findings in both humans and mice, using new biochemical, molecular and cellular approaches, have identified novel features of memory T cells providing new insight into models for memory cell development and differentiation. Biochemical and molecular studies on memory T cells have identified novel markers for memory T cells that may play integral roles in their generation and maintenance. Recent cellular immunological studies have uncovered remarkable heterogeneity amongst antigen-specific memory T cells. Memory cell heterogeneity in the expression of homing and chemokine receptor delineates functional subsets of memory T cells that differ in their proliferative capacity, differentiation potential, homing properties and protective abilities. These findings suggest that memory T cells with diverse properties residing in both lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues may be necessary to elicit a rapid and effective protective recall immune response involving both cellular and humoral immunity.     

Fish T cells: Recent advances through genomics

This brief review is intended to provide a concise overview of the current literature concerning T cells, advances in identifying distinct T cell functional subsets, and in distinguishing effector cells from memory cells. We compare and contrast a wealth of recent progress made in T cell immunology of teleost, elasmobranch, and agnathan fish, to knowledge derived from mammalian T cell studies. From genome studies, fish clearly have most components associated with T cell function and we can speculate on the presence of putative T cell subsets, and the ability to detect their differentiation to form memory cells. Some recombinant proteins for T cell associated cytokines and antibodies for T cell surface receptors have been generated that will facilitate studying the functional roles of teleost T cells during immune responses. Although there is still a long way to go, major advances have occurred in recent years for investigating T cell responses, thus phenotypic and functional characterization is on the near horizon.     

From naive to memory

Specific immune responses proceed through and are regulated at several stages: activation of naive cells and their differentiation into effector cells, completion of effector functions, development of memory cells, and subsequent reactivation of memory cells. To understand the development and regulation of CD4⁺ T cells in immune responses, naive CD4⁺ T cells were enriched from T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic mice, and used to generate effector and memory populations in vivo and in vitro. The expression of a common TCR on all of these developmental subsets has allowed us to compare directly their phenotype, cytokine profiles, activation requirements, and susceptibility to apoptosis. Our experiments have revealed interesting distinctions among naive, effector, and memory subsets of CD4⁺ T cells and have important implications for our understanding of immune responses.     

HIV-1 transgenic rats develop T cell abnormalities

HIV-1 infection leads to impaired antigen-specific T cell proliferation, increased susceptibility of T cells to apoptosis, progressive impairment of T-helper 1 (Th1) responses, and altered maturation of HIV-1-specific memory cells. We have identified similar impairments in HIV-1 transgenic (Tg) rats. Tg rats developed an absolute reduction in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells able to produce IFN-gamma following activation and an increased susceptibility of T cells to activation-induced apoptosis. CD4+ and CD8+ effector/memory (CD45RC- CD62L-) pools were significantly smaller in Tg rats compared to non-Tg controls, although the converse was true for the na?ve (CD45RC+ CD62L+) T cell pool. Our interpretation is that the HIV transgene causes defects in the development of T cell effector function and generation of specific effector/memory T cell subsets, and that activation-induced apoptosis may be an essential factor in this process.     

Distinct patterns of regeneration of central memory, effector memory and effector TCD8+ cell subsets after different hematopoietic cell transplant types: possible influence in the recovery of anti-cytomegalovirus immune response and risk for its reactivation

TCD8+ cells may be divided into subsets with different phenotypes and functions: naive, central memory, effector memory and effector. Aiming to better understand the differences in early reconstitution of these TCD8+ cell subsets and their relationship with post-transplant anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) immune responses recovery, we prospectively analyzed the transfer and expansion of these subsets in different transplant types. We found that graft cells from donor's peripheral blood, either allogeneic or autologous, were enriched for central memory, effector memory and effector phenotypes compared to allogeneic bone marrow grafts, as assessed by surface markers phenotyping and granzyme B expression. However, post-transplant, these subsets expanded in autologous recipients only, reaching numbers much greater than in allo-recipients at days +29 and +96. At the same time, autologous recipients presented less CMV reactivation and more vigorous CMV-induced interferon-gamma and lymphoproliferative responses. The marked loss of allo-transferred memory TCD8+ cells was probably due to the fact that they were more activated and more prone to apoptosis than auto-transferred TCD8+ cells as assessed by CD69 and active caspase 3 expression. Thus, transfer of peripheral blood stem cells in the allogeneic but not autologous setting is associated with poor expansion of memory TCD8+ cells, probably delaying antiviral immune reconstitution. These data may have important implications for the design of better strategies to immunoprotect this population against infectious challenges since different transplant types have different potentials for memory TCD8+ cells transfer and expansion.     

Defective generation but normal maintenance of memory T cells in old mice

The ability to maintain memory after encounter with antigen is one of the central features of the immune system. Immune memory generated during young age can be maintained well into old age. However, we know little about maintenance of immune memory generated during old age. In this study, we compared generation and maintenance of memory CD8 T cells in young (2-3-month-old) and aged (22-24-month-old) mice following acute lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. We found that young mice made a more vigorous primary T cell response and generated higher levels of memory cells than old mice. However, once generated, memory CD8 T cells were maintained at stable levels in both young and old mice for more than 5 months. Interestingly, the generation of a secondary effector response in vivo was again slightly compromised in the old mice. Taken together, these results show that generation of T cell responses is compromised in old age, but maintenance of the pool of memory T cells is not affected by the aging process.     

Heterogeneous memory T cells in antiviral immunity and immunopathology

Memory T cells are generated following an initial viral infection, and have the potential for mediating robust protective immunity to viral re-challenge due to their rapid and enhanced functional responses. In recent years, it has become clear that the memory T cell response to most viruses is remarkably diverse in phenotype, function, and tissue distribution, and can undergo dynamic changes during its long-term maintenance in vivo. However, the role of this variegation and compartmentalizationof memory T cells in protective immunity to viruses remains unclear. In this review,we discuss the diverse features of memory T cells that can delineate different subsets, the characteristics of memory T cells thus far identified to promote protective immune responses, and how the heterogeneous nature of memory T cells may also promote immunopathology during antiviral responses. We propose that given the profound heterogeneity of memory T cells, regulation of memory T cells during secondary responses could focus the response to participation of specific subsets,and/or inhibit memory T-cell subsets and functions that can lead to immunopathology.     

T inflammatory memory CD8 T cells participate to antiviral response and generate secondary memory cells with an advantage in XCL1 production

Besides the classically described subsets of memory CD8 T cells generated under infectious conditions, are T inflammatory memory cells generated under sterile priming conditions, such as sensitization to allergens. Although not fully differentiated as pathogen-induced memory cells, they display memory properties that distinguish them from naive CD8 T cells. Given these memory cells are generated in an antigen-specific context that is devoid of pathogen-derived danger signals and CD4 T cell help, we herein questioned whether they maintained their activation and differentiation potential, could be recruited in an immune response directed against a pathogen expressing their cognate antigen and further differentiate in fully competent secondary memory cells. We show that T inflammatory memory cells can indeed take part to the immune response triggered by a viral infection, differentiate into secondary effectors and further generate typical central memory CD8 T cells and effector memory CD8 T cells. Furthermore, the secondary memory cells they generate display a functional advantage over primary memory cells in their capacity to produce TNF-α and the XCL1 chemokine. These results suggest that cross-reactive stimulations and differentiation of cells directed against allergens or self into fully competent pathogen-induced memory cells might have incidences in inflammatory immuno-pathologies.     

Heterogeneity and cell-fate decisions in effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation during viral infection

Heterogeneity is a hallmark of the adaptive immune system. This is most evident in the enormous diversity of B and T cell antigen receptors. There is also heterogeneity within antiviral T cell populations, and subsets of effector and memory T cells now permeate our thinking about specialization of T cell responses to pathogens. It has been less clear, however, how heterogeneity in developing virus-specific effector and memory T cells is related to cell-fate decisions in the immune response, such as the generation long-lived memory T cells. Here we discuss recent findings that might help redefine how heterogeneity in antiviral T cell populations gives rise to T cell subsets with short- and long-lived cell fates.     

CD73 expression identifies a subset of IgM+ antigen‐experienced cells with memory attributes that is T cell and CD40 signalling dependent

B‐cell memory was long characterized as isotype‐switched, somatically mutated and germinal centre (GC)‐derived. However, it is now clear that the memory pool is a complex mixture that includes unswitched and unmutated cells. Further, expression of CD73, CD80 and CD273 has allowed the categorization of B‐cell memory into multiple subsets, with combinatorial expression of the markers increasing with GC progression, isotype‐switching and acquisition of somatic mutations. We have extended these findings to determine whether these markers can be used to identify IgM memory phenotypically as arising from T‐dependent versus T‐independent responses. We report that CD73 expression identifies a subset of antigen‐experienced IgM⁺ cells that share attributes of functional B‐cell memory. This subset is reduced in the spleens of T‐cell‐deficient and CD40‐deficient mice and in mixed marrow chimeras made with mutant and wild‐type marrow, the proportion of CD73⁺ IgM memory is restored in the T‐cell‐deficient donor compartment but not in the CD40‐deficient donor compartment, indicating that CD40 ligation is involved in its generation. We also report that CD40 signalling supports optimal expression of CD73 on splenic T cells and age‐associated B cells (ABCs), but not on other immune cells such as neutrophils, marginal zone B cells, peritoneal cavity B‐1 B cells and regulatory T and B cells. Our data indicate that in addition to promoting GC‐associated memory generation during B‐cell differentiation, CD40‐signalling can influence the composition of the unswitched memory B‐cell pool. They also raise the possibility that a fraction of ABCs may represent T‐cell‐dependent IgM memory.     

The roles of resident,central and effector memory CD4 T‐cells in protective immunity following infection or vaccination

Immunological memory provides rapid protection to pathogens previously encountered through infection or vaccination. CD4 T‐cells play a central role in all adaptive immune responses. Vaccines must, therefore, activate CD4 T‐cells if they are to generate protective immunity. For many diseases, we do not have effective vaccines. These include human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), tuberculosis and malaria, which are responsible for many millions of deaths each year across the globe. CD4 T‐cells play many different roles during the immune response coordinating the actions of many other cells. In order to harness the diverse protective effects of memory CD4 T‐cells, we need to understand how memory CD4 T‐cells are generated and how they protect the host. Here we review recent findings on the location of different subsets of memory CD4 T‐cells that are found in peripheral tissues (tissue resident memory T‐cells) and in the circulation (central and effector memory T‐cells). We discuss the generation of these cells, and the evidence that demonstrates how they provide immune protection in animal and human challenge models.     

CD4+ memory T cells: functional differentiation and homeostasis

Summary: CD4⁺ T cells are central regulators of both humoral and cellular immune responses. There are many subsets of CD4⁺ T cells, the most prominent being T‐helper 1 (Th1), Th2, Th‐17, and regulatory T cells, specialized in regulating different aspects of immunity. Without participation by these CD4⁺ T‐cell subsets, B cells cannot undergo isotype switching to generate high‐affinity antibodies, the microbicidal activity of macrophages is reduced, the efficiency of CD8⁺ T‐cell responses and CD8⁺ T‐cell memory are compromised, and downregulation of effector responses is impaired. It therefore stands to reason that memory CD4⁺ T cells are likely to fulfill an important facilitator role in the maintenance and control of protective immune responses. This review discusses some issues of importance for the generation of memory CD4⁺ T cells and focuses in particular on their heterogeneity and plasticity, with respect to both phenotypic characteristics and function. Finally, we discuss a number of factors that affect long‐term maintenance of memory CD4⁺ T cells.     

The number of long-lasting functional memory CD8+ T cells generated depends on the nature of the initial nonspecific stimulation

The mechanism of generation of memory cytotoxic T cells (CTL) following immunization remains controversial. Using tumor protection and IFN-gamma ELISPOT assays in mice to detect functional CTL, we show that the initial effector CTL burst size after immunization is not directly related to the amount of functional memory CTL formed, suggesting that memory CTL are unlikely to arise stochastically from effector CTL. Induction of MHC class II-restricted T helper cells at the time of immunization by inclusion of a T helper peptide or protein in the immunogen, is necessary to generate memory CTL, although no T helper cell induction is required to generate effector CTL to a strong MHC class I-binding peptide. Host protective T cell memory correlates with the number of CTL epitope responsive IFN-gamma-secreting memory T cells as measured in an ELISPOT assay at the time of tumor challenge. We conclude that a different antigen presenting environment is required to induce long-lasting functional memory CTL, and non-cognate stimulation of the immune system is essential to allow generation of a long-lasting host protective memory CTL response.     

The effector to memory transition of CD4 T cells

The small number of antigen-specific memory CD4 T cells surviving long-term after antigen or pathogen challenge are often characterized by a surprising degree of phenotypic and functional heterogeneity. We here propose that the immune system has evolved to express this diversity in memory T-cell populations, in order to provide flexibility in recall responses, via a rapid transition from heterogeneous effector cells into correspondingly heterogeneous memory cells. Little attention has been paid to another important transition—from resting memory cell to re-activated effector. We would suggest that superior functional attributes of secondary effectors arising from memory CD4 T cells, as compared to primary effectors arising from naïve precursors, play an important and underappreciated role in protective secondary immune responses.     

Memory CD4 T cells: generation,reactivation and re‐assignment

Immunological memory is one of the features that define the adaptive immune response: by generating specific memory cells after infection or vaccination, the host provides itself with a set of cells and molecules that can prevent future infections and disease. Despite the obvious importance of memory cells, memory CD4 T cells are incompletely understood. Here we discuss recent progress in understanding which activated T cells surmount the barrier to enter into the memory pool and, once generated, what signals are important for memory cell survival. There is still, however, little understanding of how (or even whether) memory CD4 T cells are useful once they have been created; a surprising thought considering the critical role CD4 T cells play in all adaptive primary immune responses. In light of this, we will discuss how CD4 T memory T cells respond to reactivation in vivo and whether they are malleable to a re‐assignment of their effector response.