Endoscopic mandibular condylectomy and reconstruction: early clinical results.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate early outcomes in patients who underwent endoscopic condylectomy and costochondral graft reconstruction (CCG) of the ramus/condyle unit (RCU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 10 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic condylectomy and CCG (n = 17 sides) for the treatment of idiopathic condylar resorption (n = 7), degenerative joint disease (n = 1), and malunion of a fractured condyle (n = 2) was completed. Patients were included who had 1) adequate documentation after endoscopic condylectomy and CCG reconstruction and 2) a minimum of 6-months follow-up. Patients with inadequate documentation or follow-up were excluded. The surgical technique included a 1.5-cm incision inferior to the mandibular angle. Blunt dissection was carried to the masseter muscle, which was incised using needle point electrocautery. An optical cavity was created for insertion of a Hopkins (Karl Storz, Culver City, CA) endoscope. The resection and reconstruction were carried out with endoscopic instrumentation. Preoperative (T0), postoperative (T1), and follow-up (T2) clinical examinations, lateral cephalograms, and panoramic radiographs were used to evaluate the outcomes. RESULTS: In all 10 cases, condylectomy and CCG reconstruction (n = 17 sides) were successfully performed using the endoscopic approach. The mean follow-up period was 17 months (range, 8 to 38 months). All submandibular scars were aesthetically satisfactory, and there were no facial, inferior alveolar, or lingual nerve injuries. No other intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Postoperative RCU length, mandibular position, and correction of the occlusion were documented using lateral cephalometric and panoramic radiographs. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that endoscopic condylectomy and CCG reconstruction produce satisfactory clinical outcomes without significant morbidity. Long-term follow-up studies are in progress.     

双颌手术升支截骨后退术后下颌稳定性及与关节关系的研究

目的　探讨升支矢状劈开截骨术(BSSRO)小钛板坚固内固定与口内入路升支垂直截骨术(BIVRO)下颌后退术后颌稳定性的不同规律,了解导致复发的有关因素特别是髁状突移位在不同手术后复发过程中的意义。方法　升支截骨手术后退下颌的患者共38例,皆为双颌手术,其中下颌BSSRO19例,BIVRO后退术19例。于手术前1周(T1),手术后1周(T2),3个月(T3)及1年(T4)分别拍摄定位头颅侧位片及定位颞下颌关节薛氏位片用于测量下颌移动幅度及关节髁状突的手术后移位。结果　双颌手术下颌升支截骨后退术后,BSSRO坚固内固定组1年时的复发率为25%,而BIVRO组大部分患者1年时下颌发生了与手术目的相同的移动,两组的不稳定主要发生在术后3个月内。结论　手术使髁状突移位术后位置的调整可导致BIVRO术后的下颌继续后移而不稳定,而髁状突近心骨段术中向后旋转术后位置的调整可导致BSSRO术后的下颌骨继续向前而不稳定     

Computer-assisted surgical planning and simulation for condylar reconstruction in patients with osteochondroma

We describe the use of computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning in condylar reconstruction by vertical ramus osteotomy for patients with osteochondroma, and its clinical effects. Seventeen patients with osteochondroma of the mandibular condyle who were seen from March 2005 to March 2009 were divided into 2 groups treated by condylectomy and condylar reconstruction using vertical sliding osteotomy of the mandibular ramus with and without three-dimensional simulation using Surgicase CMF Materialise software. Clinical examination, radiographs, photographs, and details of operation and outcome were used postoperatively to evaluate the clinical effects of the technique. Satisfactory mouth opening was achieved in all cases. Mean (SD) osteotomy and fixation time, duration of intermaxillary fixation, and degree of postoperative numbness of the lower lip were considerably reduced among patients who had three-dimensional simulation. The combined use of computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation with vertical ramus osteotomy to reconstruct the condyle for patients with osteochondroma after excision of the tumour makes the operation more accurate and more convenient, and avoids damage to vital structures.     

Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal stability after double-jaw surgery for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion to assess whether there were any differences between wire and rigid fixation of the mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven Class III patients had Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plate and screws for maxillary advancement. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback was stabilized with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation for 6 weeks in 20 patients (group 1) and with rigid internal fixation in 17 patients (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately after surgery, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. One year after surgery, maxillary sagittal stability was excellent in both groups, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse observed. In group 1, significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse at the posterior maxilla and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. In group 2, significant correlations were found between mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the ramus and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. No significant differences in postoperative skeletal and dental stability between groups were observed except for maxillary posterior vertical position. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures appears to be a fairly stable procedure independent of the type of fixation used to stabilize the mandible.     

Treatment of painful temporomandibular joint dysfunction with the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

PURPOSE: We describe a new indication for the sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation to treat patients with painful dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients for whom nonsurgical management failed were found to have a mandibular condyle positioned postero-superior within the glenoid fossa with reduced joint space on corrected-axis tomograms. The sagittal split ramus osteotomy was used to reposition the proximal segment and to increase joint space. Preoperative and long-term postoperative (average, 44.7 months) symptoms and tomographic findings were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: Significant pain relief occurred postoperatively in all patients. One patient had a relapse after initial improvement. No patient developed a malocclusion. The long-term radiographic condyle-fossa relationship tended to return to its preoperative position with no relapse of clinical symptoms, except in the 1 patient. CONCLUSION: The sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation is another procedure that can be used to treat painful temporomandibular joint dysfunction by changing the position of the mandibular condyle in the glenoid fossa.     

Endoscopic approach to the ramus/condyle unit: Clinical applications.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to describe use of an endoscopic technique for exposure of the mandibular ramus/condyle unit (RCU) to facilitate reconstructive jaw procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of 10 patients with diagnoses of idiopathic condylar resorption (n = 2), subcondylar fracture (n = 5), mandibular prognathism (n = 1), condylar hyperplasia (n = 1), and mandibular asymmetry (n = 1), who underwent endoscopic exposure of the RCU. RESULTS: All 10 patients had successful reconstruction of the RCU using the endoscopic approach. The procedures performed included the following: condylectomy (n = 5 sides), costochondral graft reconstruction (n = 4 sides), reduction of subcondylar fracture (n = 5 sides), and mandibular ramus osteotomy (n = 4 sides). Mean operating time was 84 minutes. No patients had marginal mandibular nerve weakness or other complications. CONCLUSION: This case series demonstrates the feasibility of endoscopic access to the RCU. The procedures can be performed with no increase in operative time and with minimal morbidity.     

Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone: a case series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the late postsurgical stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone and no posterior zygomaticomaxillary buttress internal fixation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with maxillary vertical hyperplasia and mandibular retrognathia underwent a 1-piece Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla with superior repositioning and advancement or setback. A bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement was also performed in 22 patients. Stabilization of each maxillary osteotomy was achieved using transosseous stainless steel wires and/or 3-hole titanium miniplates in the piriform aperture region bilaterally, with no zygomaticomaxillary buttress internal fixation. (Twelve of the 60 identified patients were available for a late postoperative radiographic evaluation.) Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken preoperatively (T1), early postoperatively (T2), and late postoperatively (T3) to analyze skeletal movement. RESULTS: These 12 patients (5 male, 7 female) had a mean age of 24.5 years at surgery. Mean time from surgery to T2 was 41.2 days; mean time from surgery to T3 was 14.8 months. One patient received anterior wire osteosynthesis fixation, while 11 patients received both anterior titanium miniplate internal skeletal fixation and anterior wire osteosynthesis fixation. Six patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with genioplasty, 1 patient underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, and 5 patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and genioplasty. These 12 patients all underwent maxillary superior repositioning with either advancement (11 patients) or setback (1 patient). Statistically significant surgical (T2-T1) changes were found in all variables measured. In late postsurgical measurements (T3-T2), all landmarks in the horizontal and vertical plane showed statistically significant skeletal stability. CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that anterior internal fixation alone in cases of 1-piece Le Fort I maxillary superior repositioning with advancement has good late postoperative skeletal stability.     

Effect of mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on transverse displacement of the proximal segment.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a correlation exists between: a) transverse changes in the proximal segments because of mandibular setback surgery and b) postsurgical horizontal relapse of the mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 42 patients underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy setback with rigid fixation and Le Fort I osteotomy performed by 1 surgeon between 1986 and 2000. The radiographic material for this study consisted of posteroanterior and lateral cephalometric radiographs for each patient taken preoperatively (T1), early postoperatively (T2), and late postoperatively (T3). Twenty-four of the 42 identified patients had T1, T2, and T3 radiographs, while the remainder of the patients had only T1 and T2 radiographs available. The posteroanterior radiographs were used to evaluate the angulation of the proximal segment and the intergonial width. RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in intergonial width and proximal segment angulation occurred from T1 to T2. In fact, all 42 patients had an increased intergonial width from T1 and T2. From T2 to T3, most patients underwent some relapse in their transverse dimension changes (21 of 24 patients had a decrease in their intergonial width). Overall, the intergonial width and the proximal segment angulations were significantly increased from T1 to T3. However, there was no significant correlation between the amount of transverse displacement of the proximal segment and horizontal postsurgical relapse of the mandible. CONCLUSION: The results show that statistically significant changes in the transverse width and angulation between proximal segments occur in patients undergoing bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback with rigid fixation. However, the magnitude of the changes was small, and it is still uncertain as to whether these changes are of any clinical significance.     

Correction of condylar displacement following intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy

Fifteen patients who demonstrated condylar sag after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism were treated nonsurgically to establish the desired postoperative occlusion. A mean inferior displacement of 3.33 mm and anterior displacement of 2.18 mm were observed tomographically after surgery. Postoperatively, a geometric splint was constructed to compensate for the magnitude of condylar displacement and was used to replace the original splint to hold the distal segment in an overcorrected position. Skeletal fixation was maintained for 5 to 6 weeks. Tomographic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) during maxillomandibular fixation showed a slight superior (1.03 mm) and posterior (0.51 mm) movement of the condyle in the fossa. After release of fixation and removal of splint, a further superior (2.05 mm) and posterior (1.01 mm) repositioning of the condyle was observed. This later movement correlated with the placement of light class III elastic traction to seat the condyles into the glenoid fossae and establish a class I occlusion. Temporomandibular joint tomograms confirmed complete seating of the condyles in the fossa and lateral cephalograms demonstrated a corresponding change in the position of the mandible to the desired postoperative position. This technique has been effective in preventing postoperative malocclusion resulting from condylar sag.     

Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.

PURPOSE: This study examined the stability of skeletal changes after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid or wire fixation up to 2 years postoperatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects for this multisite, prospective, clinical trial received rigid (n = 78) or wire (n = 49) fixation. The rigid cases were fixed with three 2-mm bicortical position screws and 1 to 2 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with elastics, and the wire fixation subjects were fixed with inferior border wires and had 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained before orthodontics, immediately before surgery, and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Mean anterior sagittal advancement of the mandibular symphysis was 4.92 +/3.01 mm in the rigid group and 5.11 +/- 3.09 mm in the wire group, and the inferior vertical displacement was 3.37 +/- 2.44 in the rigid group and 2.85 +/- 1.78 in the wire group. The vertical changes were similar in both groups. Two years postsurgery, the wire group had 30% sagittal relapse of the mandibular symphysis, whereas there was no change in the rigid group (P < .001). Both groups experienced changes in the orientation and configuration of the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid fixation is a more stable method than wire fixation for maintaining mandibular advancement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.     

Three-dimensional evaluation of positional change of the condyle after mandibular setback by means of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate condylar displacement in 3 dimensions by means of computed tomography after mandibular setback by sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation and to compare these results with those from patients with mandibular advancement. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty Korean subjects with skeletal class III malocclusion who had undergone mandibular setback by sagittal split ramus osteotomy had computed tomographs taken. Tomographs were taken to evaluate the temporomandibular joint 1 month before and approximately 1 month after surgery. The position and angulation of the condyle were measured on axial or sagittal views. These measurements were analyzed to determine any correlations between the amount of mandibular movement and condylar displacement. RESULTS: The results of this study show that the condyle tends to move inferiorly and rotate inward on the axial view and backward on the sagittal view by a statistically significant amount. CONCLUSION: The positional change of the condyle after sagittal split ramus osteotomy was not correlated with the amount of the setback.     

Minimally invasive orthognathic surgery: endoscopic vertical ramus osteotomy

The endoscopic procedure for placement and activation of a distraction device for mandibular advancement has been previously reported. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of endoscopic exposure, dissection and osteotomy for mandibular set-back. Two cadaver and three anesthetized minipigs were used in this study. Access to the mandibular ramus was achieved through a 2.0 cm submandibular incision. The dissection was carried sharply to the mandible and completed in the subperiosteal plane. Visualization was achieved using a 2.7 mm diameter endoscope (Karl Storz, Germany). Landmarks were identified and a custom-made retractor was inserted into the sigmoid notch. A vertical ramus osteotomy was created (bilaterally) from the sigmoid notch to the mandibular angle. The mandible was set back (average 6 mm) and fixed using 2.0 mm diameter, bicortical screws. Live animals were sacrificed three weeks postoperatively. The mandibles were examined clinically and radiographically to verify proper osteotomy position and clinical union. In all animals, exposure, accurate identification of landmarks, osteotomy placement and screw fixation were achieved. In the live animals (n=3), union between the proximal and distal segments was documented by clinical and radiographic examination. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the EVRO procedure for mandibular set-back in a minipig model.     

Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback

Postsurgical stability of mandibular setback to correct mandibular prognathism was compared for three approaches: transoral vertical ramus osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid internal fixation via bone screws. In the transoral vertical ramus osteotomy group, the mean postsurgical change in chin position was almost zero, but nearly 50% of the patients did have clinically significant changes in chin position; two thirds of these movements were posterior and one third anterior. In the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy groups, the chin either stayed in its immediately postsurgical position or moved anteriorly. In one fourth of the patients who received maxillomandibular fixation and in nearly half of the patients who received rigid internal fixation, the chin moved forward more than 4 mm.     

Transitional joint effusion in the mandibular prognathic surgery patient: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the cause of joint effusion (JE) appearing postoperatively in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of patients with mandibular prognathism on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed before and after surgery in 30 TMJs of 15 subjects with mandibular prognathism who underwent intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and in 20 TMJs of 10 subjects with mandibular prognathism who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The preoperative MR imaging was performed 1 month before surgery, and postoperative MR imaging was performed during maxillomandibular fixation. RESULTS: Preoperatively, none of SSRO and IVRO groups had JE. Postoperatively, 12 TMJs (40%) of the IVRO group and only 1 TMJ (5%) of the SSRO group had JE. As for the TMJs in the IVRO group, on MR imaging, the degree of downward movement of the condyle after surgery was larger in TMJs with JE (3.8 +/- 2.3 mm) than in TMJs without JE (1.8 +/- 1.6 mm). JE diminished within about 4 months after removal of the maxillomandibular fixation. CONCLUSION: JE appearing postoperatively in the TMJ of patients with mandibular prognathism might be relation to the degree of downward movement of the condyle.     

Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery: a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients

The objective of this cephalometric study was to evaluate skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes in 80 consecutive mandibular prognathism patients operated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and rigid fixation. Lateral cephalograms were taken on 6 occasions: immediately preoperative, immediately postoperative, 2 and 6 months postoperative, and 1 and 3 years postoperative. The results indicate that BSSO with rigid fixation for mandibular setback is a fairly stable clinical procedure. Three years after surgery, mean relapse at pogonion represented 26% of the surgical setback (19% at point B). Most of the relapse (72%) took place during the first 6 months after surgery. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery with lengthening of the elevator muscles, though evident in this study and apparently responsible for the early horizontal postoperative changes, does not seem to be associated with marked relapse. Changes occurring in some of the younger patients between 1 and 3 years postoperatively are likely to be manifestations of late mandibular growth.     

Comparison of relapse in bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular advancement: rigid internal fixation (screws) versus inferior border wiring with anterior skeletal fixation

A retrospective study of 28 patients treated by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies for mandibular advancement and stabilized by two different methods of fixation was performed. Fourteen patients received rigid fixation, and 14 patients had inferior border wiring with anterior skeletal fixation. The postoperative and long-term cephalograms (greater than 6 months) were analyzed in a horizontal and vertical direction for relapse. In the horizontal direction, the rigid group experienced a 1.5% relapse in point B and a 3.2% relapse in pogonion. In the vertical direction, the rigid group experienced a 4% relapse in point B and a 9% relapse in pogonion, while the wire osteosynthesis group had a 13% relapse in point B and a 6% relapse in pogonion. These results support the belief that rigid fixation is more stable than is wire osteosynthesis and that it helps prevent relapse in the long-term results.     

关节内窥镜辅助肋骨-软骨移植重建下颌髁突的临床应用

目的探讨经耳前切口关节内窥镜辅助肋骨-软骨移植重建髁突的可行性。方法对33例（49侧）颞下颌关节疾患,经耳前切口行髁突切除等病灶处理后充分分离下颌支表面骨膜,制备植骨床,行颌间固定;常规切取肋骨-软骨并修整形态;经颊部3～4 mm小切口穿入颊部穿通器,在内窥镜监视下,利用小型接骨板将肋骨-软骨置于下颌支外侧,完成坚固内固定。结果33例患者在关节内窥镜辅助下均顺利地完成了髁突的重建,术中视野清晰,固定稳固,无严重出血、螺钉松脱及颅脑损伤等并发症;术后无面瘫。影像学检查证实肋骨-软骨移植物与下颌支、关节窝保持良好的位置关系。结论经耳前切口关节内窥镜辅助肋骨-软骨移植重建髁突具有手术创伤小、用时短、切口小、术后无明显瘢痕和并发症少等优点。     

双侧升支矢状劈开截骨后退下颌术后骨的稳定性的研究

目的：探讨双侧升支矢状劈开截骨术（BSSRO）后退下颌骨以钢丝结扎固定两骨段加颌间固定术后骨的稳定性，了解导致复发的有关因素。方法：双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨手术后退下颌的患者14例，于手术前1周，手术后1周，术后6个月分别拍摄定位头颅侧位片及许勒位X线片，用于测量下颌移动的距离及确定下颌骨髁状突的位置。结果：双侧下颌升支矢状劈开截骨后退术后，6个月的复发率为27.2%，多元逐步回归分析示下颌后退的距离与复发相关。结论：BSSRO后退下颌骨的距离越大，术后下颌骨向前移位的可能越大。     

Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of morphologic airway changes after mandibular setback osteotomy for prognathism

OBJECTIVE: To observe changes in the pharyngeal airway and the hyoid bone position after mandibular setback osteotomy in 30 patients with mandibular prognathism by means of 3-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT). STUDY DESIGN: Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed on 17 patients treated by sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid osteosynthesis and on 13 patients treated by intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy without osteosynthesis. The amount of mandibular setback was measured by the preoperative to postoperative difference of the mandibular position in axial CT images. The sizes of the preoperative and postoperative pharyngeal airway were evaluated from semitransparent and crosscut 3DCT images. Postoperative displacement of the hyoid bone was evaluated by a technique to superimpose a postoperative hard tissue 3DCT image on the preoperative image. The helical scan technique was used in the CT examination. The volume rendering technique was used to create 3DCT images. RESULTS: The mean mandibular setback was 7.8 +/- 2.1 mm with a range of 5 to 11 mm. Three months after surgery, the lateral and frontal widths of the pharyngeal airway had decreased significantly in comparison with the preoperative width. The mean reduction rates of the lateral and frontal width were 23.6% and 11.4%, respectively. The diminished airway did not recover by either 6 months or 1 year after surgery in most cases. Downward and posterior displacement of the hyoid bone was seen postoperatively. There were positive correlations between the amount of mandibular setback and reduction of the lateral width of the pharyngeal airway (r = 0.54) and the amount of hyoid bone displacement (r = 0.42). There were no significant differences between the two surgical techniques. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional computed tomography was a practical imaging technique to evaluate the morphologic airway changes. The pharyngeal airway may have irreversible narrowing after mandibular setback surgery.     

Comparison of the clinical effects of treatment of osteochondroma by two types of vertical ramus osteotomy

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate 10 patients with osteochondroma of the mandibular condyle who were treated by vertical ramus osteotomy. Three patients had resection of the condyle and reconstruction with free vertical ramus osteotomy grafts (free graft group) and seven had pedicled vertical sliding ramus osteotomy grafts (pedicled graft group). The mean (range) observation period was 30 months. All patients had satisfactory clinical outcomes, and facial symmetry and good occlusion were achieved during the first 10 months. However, slight facial asymmetry was observed in patients treated by free grafts at 11 months, as the mandible deviated to the operated side when the mouth was opened. Postoperative radiographs showed varying degrees of neocondylar resorption and reduction in height. Patients treated with pedicled grafts did not develop these symptoms, and had no bony resorption to speak of on radiographs taken during the follow-up period. In conclusion, the advantages of the pedicled graft over the free graft include less bony resorption and better long-term clinical outcomes.