Can the combination of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related indicators predict the prostate biopsy outcome?

To assess the value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for detecting and ruling out prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA). The basic information and bpMRI images of enrolled patients who took transperineal template saturate biopsy were retrospectively collected for analysis. Based on our results, we found that free/total PSA, and PI-RADS score were independent risk factors of PCa (p < .05), the PSA density, PI-RADS score were the independent risk factors of csPCa (p < .05). PI-RADS score threshold of 3 could achieve the highest Yonder index for predicting PCa, and PI-RADS score threshold of 4 could achieve the highest Yonder index for predicting csPCa. Therefore, we draw a conclusion that PI-RADSv2 score-based bpMRI could diminish the unnecessary prostate biopsies in patients with elevated PSA when combined with other PSA-related indicators.     

Targeted prostate biopsy： value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detection of localized cancer

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men, with 1.1 million new cases worldwide reported by the World Health Organization in one recent year. Transrectal ultrasound （TRUS）-guided biopsy has been used for the diagnosis of prostate cancer for over 2 decades, but the technique is usually blind to cancer location. Moreover, the false negative rate of TRUS biopsy has been reported to be as high as 47%. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging （mp-MRI） includes T1- and T2-weighted imaging as well as dynamic contrast-enhanced （DCE） and diffusion-weighted imaging （DWI）. mp-MRI is a major advance in the imaging of prostate cancer, enabling targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions. Evolving targeted biopsy techniquesmincluding direct in-bore biopsy, cognitive fusion and software-based MRI-ultrasound （MRI-US） fusion--have led to a several-fold improvement in cancer detection compared to the earlier method. Importantly, the detection of clinically significant cancers has been greatly facilitated by targeting, compared to systematic biopsy alone. Targeted biopsy via MRI-US fusion may dramatically alter the way prostate cancer is diagnosed and managed.     

Can multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict upgrading of transrectal ultrasound biopsy results at more definitive histology?

ObjectiveTo determine whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) has a role in reducing the uncertainty in risk stratification by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy, using histology at transperineal template-guided prostate mapping (TPM) biopsy as the reference test.Materials and methodsOverall, 194 patients underwent TRUS biopsy, who were followed up in less than 18 months by means of (a) mp-MRI with pelvic phased array using T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences and (b) TPM biopsy. Of those patients, low risk on TRUS biopsy was defined in 4 different ways—(a) definition 1: Gleason 3+3 (any cancer core length) (n = 137), (b) definition 2: maximum cancer core length (MCCL)<50% (any Gleason score) (n = 62), (c) definition 3: Gleason 3+3 and MCCL<50% (n = 52), and (d) definition 4: Gleason 3+3, MCCL<50%, prostate-specific antigen level<10 ng/ml, and<50% positive cores (n = 28). Mp-MRI was scored for the likelihood of cancer from 1 (cancer very unlikely) to 5 (cancer very likely). Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MRI scores and TPM histology.ResultsMedian prostate-specific antigen level was 7 ng/ml (range: 0.9–29), median time between TRUS biopsy and mp-MRI was 120 days (range: 41–480), and median time between mp-MRI and TPM biopsy was 60 days (range: 1–420). A median of 48 cores (range: 20–118) were taken at TPM biopsy. Gleason score was upgraded in 62 of 137 (45%) patients at TPM biopsy. The negative predictive values of mp-MRI score 1 to 2 for predicting that cancer remained low risk (according to each definition) were 75%, 100%, 83%, and 100% for definitions 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. An mp-MRI score of 4 to 5 had positive predictive values for upgrade or upsize of 59%, 67%, 75%, and 69% for definitions 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.ConclusionThe presence of an mp-MRI lesion in men with low-risk prostate cancer on TRUS biopsy confers, in most patients, a high likelihood that higher-risk disease will be present (either Gleason pattern 4 or a significant cancer burden). Conversely, if a lesion is not seen on mp-MRI, the attribution of low-risk grade or cancer burden is much more likely to be correct. Mp-MRI might therefore be used to triage men for resampling biopsies before entering active surveillance.     

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with prior negative biopsy results

PurposeWe aimed to determine the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound–guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-B) results.Materials and methodsBetween 2010 and 2013, 2,416 men underwent TRUS-B or an mpMRI or both at Vancouver General Hospital. Among these, 283 men had persistent suspicion of PCa despite prior negative TRUS-B finding. An MRI was obtained in 112, and a lesion (prostate imaging reporting and data system score ≥3) was identified in 88 cases (78%). A subsequent combined MRI-targeted and standard template biopsy was performed in 86 cases. A matching cohort of 86 patients was selected using a one-nearest neighbor method without replacement. The end points were the rate of diagnosis of PCa and significant PCa (sPCa) (Gleason>6, or>2 cores, or>50% of any core).ResultsMRI-targeted TRUS-B detected PCa and sPCa in 36 (41.9%) and 30 (34.9%) men when compared with 19 (22.1%) and 14 (16.3%), respectively, men without mpMRI (P = 0.005 for both). In 9 cases (10.4%), MRI-targeted TRUS-B detected sPCa that was missed on standard cores. sPCa was present in 6 cases (6.9%) on standard cores but not the targeted cores. Multivariate analysis revealed that prostate imaging reporting and data system score and prostate-specific antigen density>0.15 ng/ml² were statistically significant predictors of significant cancer detection (odds ratio = 14.93, P<0.001 and odds ratio = 6.19, P = 0.02, respectively).ConclusionIn patients with prior negative TRUS-B finding, MRI-targeted TRUS-B improves the detection rate of all PCa and sPCa.     

Can digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography biopsy findings predict the side of nodal metastasis in prostate cancer?

PURPOSE: To assess the use of several preoperative parameters in predicting the side of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review (January 1982 to February 2004) identified 106 men with pathology proven lymph node positive prostate cancer for whom complete medical records were available. RESULTS: The median serum prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis was 11 ng/ml with the clinical stage T1C in 9 patients, T2 in 68, and T3 in 29. The Gleason score on transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) biopsy was < or =6 in 13, 7 in 41, and > or =8 in 52. A total of 93 patients had documented pretreatment digital rectal examination (DRE) findings: 54 had a unilaterally suspicious DRE, and 31 had a bilaterally suspicious DRE. Of patients with a unilaterally positive DRE, 30 had ipsilateral lymph node metastasis, 16 contralateral, and 8 bilateral. DRE showed a 71% sensitivity and 29% false-negative rate in predicting the side of nodal metastasis. A total of 98 patients had documented TRUS biopsy findings: 37 had unilaterally positive TRUS biopsies and 61 bilaterally positive biopsies. Of patients with unilaterally positive TRUS biopsies, 20 had ipsilateral lymph node metastasis, 11 contralateral, and 6 bilateral. TRUS biopsies showed an 86% sensitivity and 14% false-negative rate in predicting the side of nodal metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: DRE and TRUS biopsies do not accurately predict the side of pelvic lymph node metastasis and should not determine the extent of the pelvic lymphadenectomy.     

Are prostate needle biopsies predictive of the laterality of significant cancer and positive surgical margins?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether data obtained from preoperative prostate needle biopsy can predict the laterality of significant cancer and positive surgical margins on final‐specimen pathology after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 490 patients undergoing LRP by one surgeon were reviewed retrospectively. The demographic characteristics, intraoperative data and pathological results were analysed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine which factors before and during LRP influenced the positive surgical margin status.

RESULTS

There was only minor agreement between the laterality of positive needle biopsies and laterality of any cancer and significant cancer on final‐specimen pathology (κ = 0.135 and 0.151, respectively). This was irrespective of the number of needle cores obtained or final‐specimen Gleason grade. Similarly, the laterality of dominant cancer on needle biopsy had only a minor agreement with the location of positive surgical margins (κ = 0.050) and fair agreement with the location of extracapsular extension on final‐specimen pathology (κ = 0.235).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative needle biopsy data have only a minor correlation with the laterality of significant cancer and positive surgical margins at final pathology of LRP specimens. Recognition of this fact, and the frequent bilaterality of significant cancer, with its potential for contralateral positive surgical margins even when the biopsies are positive only unilaterally, is an important consideration when planning nerve‐sparing, and potentially for focal therapy.     

Can ploidy of prostate carcinoma diagnosed on needle biopsy predict radical prostatectomy stage and grade?

PURPOSE: Deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy correlates with the biological behavior of prostate carcinoma. However, the usefulness of ploidy on needle biopsies that show prostate cancer has not been established to our knowledge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively determined ploidy on needle biopsies of 159 men with prostate carcinoma treated surgically at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Ploidy was determined by image analysis of Feulgen stained slides. Needle ploidy and Gleason score were compared as prognostic tools in the prediction of grade and stage of subsequent prostatectomy. RESULTS: Of the 159 cases 98 (62%) were diploid, 16 (10%) tetraploid and 45 (28%) aneuploid. Of the diploid, tetraploid and aneuploid tumors 69, 50 and 44%, respectively, proved to be organ confined. Tetraploid and aneuploid tumors were grouped for the remaining analysis. Needle ploidy correlated significantly with pathological stage (p = 0.003). However, needle Gleason score correlated even more strongly (p <0.001), and on multivariate analysis ploidy was not further predictive of pathological stage once Gleason score was considered. Needle ploidy and Gleason score were predictive of prostatectomy Gleason score (6 or less versus 7 or greater), and on multivariate analysis ploidy was an independently significant predictor of this parameter (p = 0.04). In 13 cases (8%) there was an important grading discrepancy, in which needle ploidy would have accurately predicted prostatectomy grade. However, in 33 cases (21%) needle and prostatectomy Gleason scores were congruent, and needle ploidy did not accurately predict prostatectomy Gleason score. CONCLUSIONS: With accurate needle Gleason grading, ploidy is not helpful in predicting prostatectomy findings. However, ploidy correlates with prostatectomy stage and grade, and may be useful if accurate Gleason grading is a concern.     

Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer?

Background

The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying residual disease after breast conservation therapy (BCT) is unclear.

Method

Review of an institutional database identified patients with positive or close (≤2 mm) margins undergoing MRI before re-excision. Histopathologic correlation was performed.

Results

Forty-three women underwent MRI after BCT. MRI suggested residual disease in 29 patients, of whom 20 (69%) had residual carcinoma pathologically. Nine patients had false-positive MRI as seen by benign pathology findings. Fourteen MRIs indicated no residual disease, of which 6 had residual disease pathologically. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of MRI was 77% and 69%, respectively. MRI conducted within 28 days of the original surgery was 85% sensitive. MRI performed after 28 days was 69% sensitive.

Conclusions

MRI is able to detect residual disease among most patients undergoing re-excision. False-positive results may be caused by inflammatory processes that resemble residual disease.     

Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging

Purpose

The goal of this study was to compare the diagnostic use and safety of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI with those of phased-array coil MRI.

Methods

We retrospectively included 91 consecutive patients who had undergone 1.5-T MRI with ERC or with phased-array coil MRI before radical prostatectomy at our institution. We compared 47 patients’ phased-array coil MRI and 44 patients’ ERC-MRI with histologic findings. We also evaluated adverse events following the MRI procedure.

Results

The serum PSA levels ranged from 2.85 to 33.51 ng/mL (10.72 ± 1.9), and the median Gleason score was 7 (range 4–9). The mean interval between diagnostic prostate biopsy and staging MRI was 18.4 days (range 2–37). In assessing organ-confined disease, extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion by MRI, there were no significant differences between ERC-MR group and phased-array coil MR group. The AUC values were 0.671 (95% CI 0.530–0.813) for ERC-MR and 0.657 (95% CI 0.503–0.811) for phased-array coil MR. No significant differences were found between the two groups (p = 0.24). Five patients (11.4%) developed rectal complications after ERC-MRI. However, no complications were found in phased-array coil MRI group.

Conclusions

In terms of diagnostic accuracy and comfort of patients, the use of ERC-MRI did not significantly improve the staging of prostate cancer and presented several complications. Therefore, phased-array coil MRI is a better alternative considering comorbidity.     

Can dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with chemical shift studies predict the status of adrenal masses?

Endoscopic adrenalectomy represents the new gold standard in the surgical treatment of benign adrenal lesions up to 6 cm. In some cases lesions larger than 10 cm have been removed laparoscopically to offer the patient the advantages of the minimally invasive technique. The larger the diameter of an adrenal lesion, the greater the probability of malignancy. In a prospective study 130 consecutive patients (88 women, 42 men; mean age 47.8 years) with 137 adrenal lesions earmarked for surgery underwent preoperative gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with chemical shift studies (CSS). The aim of this study was to predict the status (benign, borderline, malignant) of adrenal lesions by MRI irrespective of tumor size. There were 14 patients with malignant tumors, 3 had borderline tumors (epithelial tumors with high malignant potential), and the remaining 120 had benign adrenal lesions. Five malignant lesions (36%) had a diameter < 6 cm. MRI correctly predicted 11 of 14 malignant tumors (1 malignant pheochromocytoma and 2 adrenocortical carcinomas had false-negative results), 117 of 120 benign lesions, and 2 of 3 borderline lesions. All but two malignant tumors were operated on using open surgery; 82 (68%) of 120 benign adrenal lesions were treated using the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Tumor size alone is not suitable for predicting the status of adrenal lesions. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI with CSS can predict the status of at least 95% of adrenal lesions. Tumors > 6 cm classified as benign by preoperative MRI may be removed laparoscopically by endocrine surgeons experienced in endoscopic adrenalectomy.     

Does presence of prostate cancer affect serum testosterone levels in clinically localized prostate cancer patients?

The relationships between serum level of testosterone (T) and prostate cancer (PCa) are complex. The present study evaluated whether presence of PCa alters serum T levels. Subjects were 125 patients with clinically localized PCa treated using radical prostatectomy (RP), for whom pretreatment T levels were recorded. We investigated clinical and pathological factors such as pretreatment serum T level, age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score and pathological stage. Serum T and human luteinizing hormone (LH) levels before and after RP were then compared in 118 of the 125 patients. Mean pretreatment T level was significantly higher in patients with organ-confined PCa (pT2; 4.03+/-1.50 ng ml(-1)) than in patients with nonorgan-confined cancer (pT3; 3.42+/-1.06 ng ml(-1); P=0.0438). No association existed between pretreatment serum T level and pathological Gleason score. After RP, serum T level (5.60+/-1.90 ng ml(-1)) was significantly elevated compared to preoperative level (3.89+/-1.43 ng ml(-1); P<0.0001). In parallel, significant increases were seen in postoperative serum LH level (6.86+/-3.64 ng ml(-1)) compared to preoperative level (5.11+/-2.47 ng ml(-1); P=0.0001). In contrast, differences in serum T levels according to pathological stage disappeared postoperatively (P=0.5513). Significant increases in serum T and LH levels were seen after RP, compared to preoperative levels in parallel. This study suggests that serum T levels are altered by the presence of PCa, supporting the possibility that PCa may inhibit serum T levels with negative feedback in the hypothalamic-pituitary axis.     

Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?

BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of the prostate biopsy remains controversial. There is a need to avoid detection of insignificant cancer but not to miss significant and curable tumors. In alternative treatments of prostate cancer, repeated sextant biopsies are used to estimate the response. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a repeated systematic sextant biopsy as the standard biopsy technique in patients with significant tumors which are being considered for curative treatment. METHODS: Systematic sextant biopsy was performed in vitro in 92 radical prostatectomy specimens. Of these patients, 81 (88.0%) had palpable lesions. RESULTS: Of the 92 investigated patients, 70 (76.1%) had potentially curable pT2-3pN0 prostate cancers. In these patients, the cancer was detected only in 72.9% of cases by a repeated in vitro biopsy. In the pT2 tumors, there was a detection rate of only 66.7%. CONCLUSIONS: This study underlines the fact that a considerable number of significant and potentially curable tumors remain undetected by the conventional sextant biopsy. A negative sextant biopsy does not rule out significant prostate cancer.     

Does body‐coil magnetic‐resonance imaging have a role in the preoperative staging of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy and use of body-coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the local staging of prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients undergoing RP were staged before surgery using body-coil MRI; none was denied surgery on the basis of their scan results. All scans were reported before RP by one of three consultant radiologists and afterward by a colleague with a special interest in prostate MRI, unaware of the patients' clinical details. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of MRI at detecting extracapsular extension was 50% on general reporting and 72% when reported by the specialist radiologist; the respective specificities were 84% and 86%. Of the 55 patients included in the study, 18 (33%) had extracapsular disease on histological analysis. MRI was most accurate in the 17 patients at high-risk (prostate-specific antigen, PSA, >10 ng/mL and Gleason score >or= 8) and eight at intermediate risk (PSA < 10 ng/mL and Gleason score 7). In the former group with specialist analysis, the sensitivity was 100%, although this decreased to 67% with general reporting. Both gave a specificity of 82%. Intermediate risk disease gave a sensitivity and specificity of 75%, irrespective of reporting method. The ability of MRI to detect extraprostatic tumour in the 30 low-risk patients (PSA < 10 ng/mL and Gleason score 2-6) was poor; the sensitivity was 25% with general and 50% on specialist review, although both methods gave a specificity of >90%. CONCLUSION: Body-coil MRI is sensitive and specific for identifying extracapsular extension of prostate cancer in patients with high- or intermediate-risk disease. Patients at low risk frequently have microscopic extension which is not detected. Opinion from a radiologist with a special interest in prostate MRI can increase the reporting accuracy even when unaware of the patients' clinical details.     

Does age influence the behaviour of localized prostate cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To assess, in a meta-analysis of published studies, whether age influences the behaviour of localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The Medline database was searched from 1966 to 2000 to identify studies analysing the outcome of localized prostate cancer by age, using disease-specific outcome measures, and having controlled for the established prognostic factors of grade, T stage and, where available, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. RESULTS: In all, 34 studies were identified, which included a total of 27 551 patients. The incomplete and heterogeneous nature of the reports precluded any quantitative overview. The findings of these reports are described and methodological shortcomings discussed. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that young age was an adverse prognostic factor in some series of radiation therapy before the advent of PSA assays, when men typically presented clinically with locally advanced disease, but that age has no significant prognostic effect in contemporary series of localized prostate cancer. Possible explanations for this difference are discussed, together with implications for further studies.