Echinocandins in invasive candidiasis]

Invasive fungal infections on the intensive care unit are predominantly caused by Candida spp., most frequently manifesting as candidemia. In spite of increasing treatment options during the last 2 decades, mortality of invasive candidiasis remains high with 20-50%. With the echinocandins, a new class of antifungal drugs with activity against clinically relevant Aspergillus and Candida spp. has become available since the beginning of the new millennium. The echinocandins have shown convincing efficacy in numerous multicenter, mostly double-blinded phase III clinical trials. These trials compared current standard treatment regimens with the echinocandins anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin. All trials observed noninferiority of the new drugs against the standard treatment; in the case of anidulafungin, superiority against fluconazole was demonstrated. Especially in trials utilizing amphotericin B as comparator, significantly less treatment-related adverse events were observed when using an echinocandin. Echinocandins have a low drug-drug interaction profile and are only marginally affected by liver function. Especially in ICU (intensive care unit) patients frequently showing single- or multiorgan failure and receiving a multitude of drugs with complex interactions, echinocandins have become the treatment of first choice for invasive candidiasis.     

Management of systemic fungal infections: alternatives to itraconazole

For many years, amphotericin B and flucytosine have been the only antifungal agents for invasive fungal infections. Amphotericin B was the standard of care for most of these infections. However, its use was often associated with low efficacy and poor tolerance. Fortunately, the antifungal armamentarium has increased during the past two decades with the addition of several new agents. In addition to itraconazole and fluconazole, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, voriconazole, caspofungin and micafungin have arrived on the market. Other agents are expected to be licensed shortly (anidulafungin, posaconazole). These various antifungal agents differ in their spectrum, pharmacokinetic profile, route of administration, efficacy in clinical trials, safety profile, drug-drug interactions and, importantly, their cost. There is no longer a unique standard agent for all or nearly all invasive fungal infections but a real choice among several agents. The characteristics of these new agents are reviewed to help clinicians in their decision to select an antifungal agent for their patients.     

Anidulafungin pharmacokinetics and microbial response in neutropenic mice with disseminated candidiasis

Candidemia is often fatal, especially in patients with persistent neutropenia. New therapies are needed. We performed 24-h pharmacodynamic studies to compare the efficacies of anidulafungin, fluconazole, and amphotericin B in neutropenic mice with disseminated candidiasis caused by one of three strains of Candida glabrata. Anidulafungin produced a maximal fungal kill (E(max)) of 1.4 to 1.9 log(10) CFU/g in kidneys and was not influenced by resistance to either fluconazole or amphotericin B. Fluconazole produced an E(max) of 1.3 log(10) CFU/g in mice infected with fluconazole-susceptible C. glabrata, but the E(max) was 0 for mice infected with a C. glabrata strain that had a fluconazole MIC of >/=32 mg/liter. Amphotericin B achieved an E(max) of 4.2 log(10) CFU/g in mice infected with amphotericin B-susceptible C. glabrata, but the E(max) was 0 for mice infected with a C. glabrata strain with an amphotericin B MIC of 2 mg/liter. In all instances, anidulafungin's maximal microbial kill was superior to that of fluconazole. Next, we performed a 96-h anidulafungin pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study. Anidulafungin exhibited delayed peak concentrations in kidneys compared to those in serum, after which the concentrations declined, with a serum terminal half-life of 21.6 (+/-4.6) h. This was accompanied by a persistent 96-h decrease in the kidney fungal burden after treatment with a single anidulafungin dose of >/=8 mg/kg of body weight. This pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic picture of anidulafungin persistence in tissues and the resultant persistent fungal decline should be exploited to improve the efficacy of anidulafungin therapy for candidemia.     

Anidulafungin: is it a promising option in the treatment of pediatric invasive fungal infections?

Cases of invasive fungal infections are increasing globally due to an increase in the immunosuppressed population, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and the invasive instrumentation of patients in intensive care units. Ongoing emergence of resistance and problems with toxicity have resulted in the need for the development of new antifungal agents. Anidulafungin, the most recently developed echinocandin, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of candidemia, other forms of Candida infection and esophageal candidiasis in non-neutropenic adult patients, but it is not currently licensed for pediatric usage. The drug is projected to be distinctive owing to its unique pharmacokinetics and is already listed in adult antifungal treatment guidelines. In this article, anidulafungin will be reviewed with a focus on pediatric patients.     

Anidulafungin: review of a new echinocandin antifungal agent

Anidulafungin (Vicuron Pharmaceuticals) is a new echinocandin antifungal with potent activity against Aspergillus and Candida spp. Anidulafungin is a noncompetitive inhibitor of (1,3)-beta-D-glucan synthase within fungal cells. The drug is rapidly distributed and steady-state concentrations are achieved after the first dose, when a loading dose of twice the daily maintenance dose is given on day 1. Drug biotransformation occurs via chemical degradation, with no hepatic metabolism or renal elimination. A favorable pharmacokinetic profile and lack of significant drug interactions suggest that patients can receive anidulafungin without dosage adjustments. These characteristics, in addition to comparable efficacy to fluconazole (Diflucan, Pfizer Ltd) in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis, support further investigation of its use in the treatment of systemic fungal infections caused by Candida and Aspergillus spp.     

Impact of special patient populations on the pharmacokinetics of echinocandins

Echinocandins belong to the class of antifungal agents. Currently, three echinocandin drugs are licensed for intravenous treatment of invasive fungal infections: anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin. While their antifungal activity overlaps, there are substantial differences in pharmacokinetics (PK). Numerous factors may account for variability in PK of echinocandins including age (pediatrics vs adults), body surface area and body composition (normal weight vs obesity), disease status (e.g., critically ill and burn patients) and organ dysfunction (kidney and liver impairment). Subsequent effects of altered exposure might impact efficacy and safety. Knowledge of PK behavior is crucial in optimal clinical utilization of echinocandin in a specific patient or patient population. This review provides up-to-date information on PK data of anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin in special patient populations. Patient populations addressed are neonates, children and adolescents, obese patients, patients with hepatic or renal impairment, critically ill patients (including burn patients) and patients with hematological diseases.     

Caspofungin: the first representative of a new antifungal class

Caspofungin (MK-0991; L-743,872) belongs to the echinocandin family, a new class of antifungal agents that act on the fungal cell wall by inhibiting glucan synthesis. Data in vitro, and experimental studies, have demonstrated that caspofungin has antifungal activity against yeasts of the genus Candida (including isolates resistant to azoles and amphotericin B), several species of filamentous fungi, including Aspergillus, and certain dimorphic fungi, such as Histoplasma, Blastomyces and Coccidioides. In vitro and in animals, caspofungin shows additive or synergic antifungal activity with amphotericin B and triazoles. It also possesses activity against Pneumocystis carinii. Clinical trials have shown caspofungin to be well tolerated and effective in invasive aspergillosis in patients refractory or intolerant to standard treatment (45% favourable responses), in oropharyngeal and oesophageal candidiasis (67-93% favourable responses with an efficacy similar to those of amphotericin B and fluconazole), and in invasive candidiasis with efficacy equivalent to that of amphotericin B, and better tolerability. The results of these first clinical trials were promising, and led to the approval of caspofungin for invasive aspergillosis after failure of, or intolerance to, standard therapy. Further studies are required to define the exact role of caspofungin in the antifungal armamentarium.     

Anidulafungin: review of a new echinocandin antifungal agent

Anidulafungin (Vicuron Pharmaceuticals) is a new echinocandin antifungal with potent activity against Aspergillus and Candida spp. Anidulafungin is a noncompetitive inhibitor of (1,3)-β-d-glucan synthase within fungal cells. The drug is rapidly distributed and steady-state concentrations are achieved after the first dose, when a loading dose of twice the daily maintenance dose is given on day 1. Drug biotransformation occurs via chemical degradation, with no hepatic metabolism or renal elimination. A favorable pharmacokinetic profile and lack of significant drug interactions suggest that patients can receive anidulafungin without dosage adjustments. These characteristics, in addition to comparable efficacy to fluconazole (Diflucan^®, Pfizer Ltd) in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis, support further investigation of its use in the treatment of systemic fungal infections caused by Candida and Aspergillus spp.     

Prospective multicenter study of the epidemiology, molecular identification, and antifungal susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis isolated from patients with candidemia

A 13-month prospective multicenter study including 44 hospitals was carried out to evaluate the epidemiology of Candida parapsilosis complex candidemia in Spain. Susceptibility to amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin was tested by the microdilution colorimetric method. A total of 364 C. parapsilosis complex isolates were identified by molecular methods: C. parapsilosis (90.7%), Candida orthopsilosis (8.2%), and Candida metapsilosis (1.1%). Most candidemias (C. parapsilosis, 76.4%; C. orthopsilosis, 70.0%; C. metapsilosis, 100%) were observed in adults. No C. orthopsilosis or C. metapsilosis candidemias occurred in neonates. C. parapsilosis was most frequent in adult intensive care unit (28.8%), surgery (20.9%), and internal medicine (19.7%) departments; and C. orthopsilosis was most frequent in hematology (28.6%), pediatrics (12.0%), and neonatology (11.5%) departments. The geographic distribution of C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis was not uniform. According to CLSI clinical breakpoints, all C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis isolates were susceptible to the nine agents tested. Resistance (MICs > 1 mg/liter) was observed only in C. parapsilosis: amphotericin B, posaconazole, itraconazole, and caspofungin (0.3% each), anidulafungin (1.9%), and micafungin (2.5%). Applying the new species-specific fluconazole and echinocandin breakpoints, the rates of resistance to fluconazole for C. parapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis increased to 4.8% and 0.3%, respectively; conversely, for C. parapsilosis they shifted from 1.9 to 0.6% (anidulafungin) and from 2.5 to 0.6% (micafungin). Our study confirms the different prevalence of C. parapsilosis complex candidemia among age groups: neither C. orthopsilosis nor C. metapsilosis was isolated from neonates; interestingly, C. metapsilosis was isolated only from adults and the elderly. The disparity in antifungal susceptibility among species could be important for therapy.     

Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Anidulafungin in Adult Patients with Fungal Infections

To evaluate the exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety of intravenous anidulafungin in adult patients with fungal infections, a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) analysis was performed with data from 262 patients in four phase 2/3 studies. The plasma concentration data were fitted with a previously developed population PK model. Anidulafungin exposures in patients with weight extremities (e.g., 40 kg and 150 kg) were simulated based on the final PK model. Since the patient population, disease status, and efficacy endpoints varied in these studies, the exposure-efficacy relationship was investigated separately for each study using logistic regression as appropriate. Safety data from three studies (n = 235) were pooled for analysis, and one study was excluded due to concomitant use of amphotericin B as a study treatment and different disease populations. The analysis showed that the same dosing regimen of anidulafungin can be administered to all patients regardless of body weight. Nonetheless, caution should be taken for patients with extremely high weight (e.g., >150 kg). There was a trend of positive association between anidulafungin exposure and efficacy in patients with esophageal candidiasis or invasive candidiasis, including candidemia (ICC); however, adequate characterization of the effect of anidulafungin exposure on response could not be established due to the relatively small sample size. No threshold value for exposure could be established, since patients with low exposure also achieved successful outcomes (e.g., area under the curve < 40 mg · h/liter in ICC patients). There was no association between anidulafungin exposure and the treatment-related adverse events or all-causality hepatic laboratory abnormalities.     

Bench-to-bedside review: <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida</Emphasis> infections in the intensive care unit

Invasive mycoses are life-threatening opportunistic infections and have emerged as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. This review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the epidemiology, diagnosis and management of invasive candidiasis, which is the predominant fungal infection in the intensive care unit setting. Candida spp. are the fourth most common cause of bloodstream infections in the USA, but they are a much less common cause of bloodstream infections in Europe. About one-third of episodes of candidaemia occur in the intensive care unit. Until recently, Candida albicans was by far the predominant species, causing up to two-thirds of all cases of invasive candidiasis. However, a shift toward non-albicans Candida spp., such as C. glabrata and C. krusei, with reduced susceptibility to commonly used antifungal agents, was recently observed. Unfortunately, risk factors and clinical manifestations of candidiasis are not specific, and conventional culture methods such as blood culture systems lack sensitivity. Recent studies have shown that detection of circulating β-glucan, mannan and antimannan antibodies may contribute to diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. Early initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy is essential for reducing the morbidity and mortality of invasive fungal infections. For decades, amphotericin B deoxycholate has been the standard therapy, but it is often poorly tolerated and associated with infusion-related acute reactions and nephrotoxicity. Azoles such as fluconazole and itraconazole provided the first treatment alternatives to amphotericin B for candidiasis. In recent years, several new antifungal agents have become available, offering additional therapeutic options for the management of Candida infections. These include lipid formulations of amphotericin B, new azoles (voriconazole and posaconazole) and echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin and anidulafungin).     

Anidulafungin and Micafungin MIC Breakpoints Are Superior to That of Caspofungin for Identifying FKS Mutant Candida glabrata Strains and Echinocandin Resistance

By CLSI interpretive criteria, anidulafungin and micafungin MICs determined by various methods were sensitive (60 to 70%) and highly specific (94 to 100%) for identifying FKS mutations among 120 Candida glabrata isolates. Anidulafungin and micafungin breakpoints were more specific than CLSI''s caspofungin breakpoint in identifying FKS mutant strains and patients with invasive candidiasis who were likely to fail echinocandin treatment (P ≤ 0.0001 for both). Echinocandin MICs were most useful clinically when interpreted in the context of prior echinocandin exposure.     

Invasive candidiasis: comparison of management choices by infectious disease and critical care specialists

Objective To compare the management of invasive candidiasis between infectious disease and critical care specialists.Design and setting Clinical case scenarios of invasive candidiasis were presented during interactive sessions at national specialty meetings. Participants responded to questions using an anonymous electronic voting system.Patients and participants Sixty-five infectious disease and 51 critical care physicians in Switzerland.Results Critical care specialists were more likely to ask advice from a colleague with expertise in the field of fungal infections to treat Candida glabrata (19.5% vs. 3.5%) and C. krusei (36.4% vs. 3.3%) candidemia. Most participants reported that they would change or remove a central venous catheter in the presence of candidemia, but 77.1% of critical care specialists would start concomitant antifungal treatment, compared to only 50% of infectious disease specialists. Similarly, more critical care specialists would start antifungal prophylaxis when Candida spp. are isolated from the peritonal fluid at time of surgery for peritonitis resulting from bowel perforation (22.2% vs. 7.2%). The two groups equally considered Candida spp. as pathogens in tertiary peritonitis, but critical care specialists would more frequently use amphotericin B than fluconazole, caspofungin, or voriconazole. In mechanically ventilated patients the isolation of 10⁴ Candida spp. from a bronchoalveolar lavage was considered a colonizing organism by 94.9% of infectious disease, compared to 46.8% of critical care specialists, with a marked difference in the use of antifungal agents (5.1% vs. 51%).Conclusions These data highlight differences between management approaches for candidiasis in two groups of specialists, particularly in the reported use of antifungals.     

In vitro activities of anidulafungin and other antifungal agents against biofilms formed by clinical isolates of different Candida and Aspergillus species

We tested the activities of anidulafungin and other antifungal agents against clinical isolates of different fungal species. For Candida species, high sessile MIC₉₀s (SMIC₉₀s) were obtained for fluconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B, whereas the anidulafungin SMIC₉₀s were very low, as were those for caspofungin. Comparatively, for Aspergillus species, higher SMIC₉₀ values were obtained not only for amphotericin B and voriconazole but also for the echinocandins.     

Efficacy of aminocandin in the treatment of immunocompetent mice with haematogenously disseminated fluconazole-resistant candidiasis

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the activity of aminocandin, a new echinocandin with broad-spectrum activity against Candida spp., with that of amphotericin B, caspofungin and fluconazole, in an immunocompetent murine model of haematogenously disseminated candidiasis caused by a fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans. METHODS: Mice were infected with a fluconazole-resistant strain of C. albicans and treated with aminocandin 5 and 10 mg/kg intravenously (iv) once and twice weekly, amphotericin B 0.5 mg/kg iv every other day for 5 days, fluconazole 20 mg/kg orally (po) once a day for 5 days and caspofungin 0.5 mg/kg intraperitoneally (ip) once daily for 5 days. RESULTS: Treatment with aminocandin, given iv twice a week, resulted in 100% survival. Further, the tissue fungal burden of the aminocandin group was equivalent to that of amphotericin B (administered every other day) and caspofungin (administered daily). CONCLUSIONS: Aminocandin may be an effective addition to the arsenal of antifungal compounds for the treatment of candidiasis caused by fluconazole-resistant C. albicans.     

Initial results from a longitudinal international surveillance programme for anidulafungin (2003)

OBJECTIVES: This longitudinal study evaluated the in vitro activity of anidulafungin against 880 clinical yeast isolates and 68 mould isolates from 64 medical centres in North America, Latin America and Europe. METHODS: MICs of anidulafungin, amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole and voriconazole were determined using reference method (M27-A2) guidelines. The M38-A reference method was used for the filamentous fungi, including determination of minimum effective concentrations (MECs) of anidulafungin. RESULTS: Anidulafungin was more active when compared with fluconazole and itraconazole for Candida albicans (MIC(90), 0.06 mg/L), Candida tropicalis (MIC(90), 0.06 mg/L), Candida glabrata (MIC(90), 0.12 mg/L), Candida krusei (MIC(90), 0.06 mg/L) and Candida lusitaniae (MIC(90), 1 mg/L) as well as the less-often encountered yeast species. Anidulafungin was less active against Candida parapsilosis, Candida guilliermondii and Candida famata (MIC(50), 1-2 mg/L). Anidulafungin also exhibited excellent activity against all Aspergillus spp. (MEC(90), < or =0.03 mg/L). Anidulafungin was also evaluated comparing two end point reading criteria and two incubation intervals. Data indicate that longer incubation periods do not significantly influence overall MIC ranges. These international surveillance results for anidulafungin confirm the activity observed in studies of smaller numbers of isolates.     

The Presence of an FKS Mutation Rather than MIC Is an Independent Risk Factor for Failure of Echinocandin Therapy among Patients with Invasive Candidiasis Due to Candida glabrata

Echinocandins are frontline agents against invasive candidiasis (IC), but predictors for echinocandin therapeutic failure have not been well defined. Mutations in Candida FKS genes, which encode the enzyme targeted by echinocandins, result in elevated MICs and have been linked to therapeutic failures. In this study, echinocandin MICs by broth microdilution and FKS1 and FKS2 mutations among C. glabrata isolates recovered from patients with IC at our center were correlated retrospectively with echinocandin therapeutic responses. Thirty-five patients with candidemia and 4 with intra-abdominal abscesses were included, 92% (36/39) of whom received caspofungin. Twenty-six percent (10) and 74% (29) failed and responded to echinocandin therapy, respectively. Caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin MICs ranged from 0.5 to 8, 0.03 to 1, and 0.015 to 0.5 μg/ml, respectively. FKS mutations were detected in 18% (7/39) of C. glabrata isolates (FKS1, n = 2; FKS2, n = 5). Median caspofungin and anidulafungin MICs were higher for patients who failed therapy (P = 0.04 and 0.006, respectively). By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, MIC cutoffs that best predicted failure were >0.5 (caspofungin), >0.06 (anidulafungin), and >0.03 μg/ml (micafungin), for which sensitivity/specificity were 60%/86%, 50%/97%, and 40%/90%, respectively. Sensitivity/specificity of an FKS mutation in predicting failure were 60%/97%. By univariate analysis, recent gastrointestinal surgery, prior echinocandin exposure, anidulafungin MIC of >0.06 μg/ml, caspofungin MIC of >0.5 μg/ml, and an FKS mutation were significantly associated with failure. The presence of an FKS mutation was the only independent risk factor by multivariate analysis (P = 0.002). In conclusion, detection of C. glabrata FKS mutations was superior to MICs in predicting echinocandin therapeutic responses among patients with IC.     

Efficacy of oral E1210, a new broad-spectrum antifungal with a novel mechanism of action, in murine models of candidiasis, aspergillosis, and fusariosis

E1210 is a first-in-class, broad-spectrum antifungal with a novel mechanism of action-inhibition of fungal glycosylphosphatidylinositol biosynthesis. In this study, the efficacies of E1210 and reference antifungals were evaluated in murine models of oropharyngeal and disseminated candidiasis, pulmonary aspergillosis, and disseminated fusariosis. Oral E1210 demonstrated dose-dependent efficacy in infections caused by Candida species, Aspergillus spp., and Fusarium solani. In the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis, E1210 and fluconazole each caused a significantly greater reduction in the number of oral CFU than the control treatment (P < 0.05). In the disseminated candidiasis model, mice treated with E1210, fluconazole, caspofungin, or liposomal amphotericin B showed significantly higher survival rates than the control mice (P < 0.05). E1210 was also highly effective in treating disseminated candidiasis caused by azole-resistant Candida albicans or Candida tropicalis. A 24-h delay in treatment onset minimally affected the efficacy outcome of E1210 in the treatment of disseminated candidiasis. In the Aspergillus flavus pulmonary aspergillosis model, mice treated with E1210, voriconazole, or caspofungin showed significantly higher survival rates than the control mice (P < 0.05). E1210 was also effective in the treatment of Aspergillus fumigatus pulmonary aspergillosis. In contrast to many antifungals, E1210 was also effective against disseminated fusariosis caused by F. solani. In conclusion, E1210 demonstrated consistent efficacy in murine models of oropharyngeal and disseminated candidiasis, pulmonary aspergillosis, and disseminated fusariosis. These data suggest that further studies to determine E1210's potential for the treatment of disseminated fungal infections are indicated.     

Second-line therapy with caspofungin for mucosal or invasive candidiasis: results from the caspofungin compassionate-use study

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of caspofungin as second-line therapy for mucosal or invasive candidiasis in patients enrolled in the caspofungin compassionate-use study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with mucosal or invasive candida infections (17 oesophageal, four oropharyngeal and 16 invasive candidiasis) were enrolled in the caspofungin compassionate-use study. All patients were refractory to or intolerant of intravenous amphotericin B or lipid amphotericin formulation(s). Efficacy was assessed at the end of intravenous caspofungin therapy based on clinical (and, where appropriate, microbiological) response. RESULTS: HIV was the most common (91%) risk factor in patients with mucosal candidiasis; patients with invasive candidiasis commonly had acute leukaemia/lymphoma (50%) or diabetes mellitus (31%). Most patients with mucosal candidiasis (91%) and invasive candidiasis (94%) were refractory to >/=1 antifungal agent(s). A favourable response was noted in 82% (14/17) with oesophageal candidiasis, 100% (4/4) with oropharyngeal candidiasis and 87% (13/15) with invasive candidiasis. Caspofungin was generally well tolerated; one serious drug-related adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: In this study, caspofungin was an effective alternative for patients with refractory candida infections.     

In vitro activity of voriconazole,itraconazole, caspofungin,anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and amphotericin B against aspergillus spp

Voriconazole, anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and caspofungin are promising antifungal agents which provide a good protection against a variety of fungi, including yeasts and filamentous fungi. In this study, we tested the in vitro efficacy of voriconazole, itraconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and amphotericin B, against different species of Aspergillus spp. isolated from clinical specimens, using a microdilution broth method and following the NCCLS guidelines (document M38-P). We also evaluated the effect that time readings have on MIC results. For caspofungin, we determined the minimun effective concentration (MEC), defined like the lowest concentration of caspofungin causing abnormal hyphal growth. Anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) was the most active antifungal agent tested with MIC(90) of < or =0,03 mg/L. The activity of voriconazole, and itraconazole very similar with MIC(90) of 0,12 mg/L, 0,12 mg/L respectively. For caspofungin the MEC(90) was of 0,25 mg/L. Amphotericin B was the lest active antifungal agent studied with MIC(90) of 1 mg/L. There were no differences between MIC values at 48 and 72 h. These data demonstrate promising activity of voriconazole, anidulafungin (VER002, LY303366) and caspofungin against Apergillus spp.