Racial variation in receipt of quality radiation therapy for prostate cancer

Purpose

Racial disparities are apparent in the management and outcomes for prostate cancer; however, disparities in compliance to quality measures for radiation therapy for prostate cancer have not been previously studied. Therefore, the goal of the study was to characterize disparities in the compliance rates with quality measures.

Methods

The comparative effectiveness analysis of radiation therapy and surgery study is a population-based, prospective cohort study that enrolled 3708 men with clinically localized prostate cancer from 2011 to 2012. Compliance with 5 radiation-specific quality measures endorsed by national consortia as of 2011 was assessed, and compliance was compared by race using logistic regression.

Results

Overall, 604 men received definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of which 20% were self-reported black, 74% non-Hispanic white, and 6% Hispanic. Less than two-thirds of black and Hispanic men received EBRT that was compliant with all available quality measures (p?=?0.012). Compared to white men, black men were less likely to receive dose-escalated EBRT (95% vs. 87%, p?=?0.011) and less likely to avoid unnecessary pelvic radiation for low-risk disease (99% vs. 20%, p?<?0.001). Compared to white men, Hispanic men were less likely to undergo image guidance (87% vs. 71%, p?=?0.04). Black and Hispanic men were more likely to receive EBRT from low-quality providers than white men.

Conclusions

Addressing disparities in access to providers that meet quality guidelines, and improving adherence to evidence-based processes of care may decrease racial/ethnic disparities in prostate cancer outcomes.

     

Racial/ethnic differences in receipt of pelvic lymph node dissection among men with localized/regional prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

Black and Hispanic men have a lower prostate cancer (PCa) survival rate than white men. This racial/ethnic survival gap has been explained in part by differences in tumor characteristics, stage at diagnosis, and disparities in receipt of definitive treatment. Another potential contributing factor is racial/ethnic differences in the timely and accurate detection of lymph node metastases. The current study was conducted to examine the association between race/ethnicity and the receipt of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) among men with localized/regional PCa.

METHODS:

Logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds of undergoing PLND among men who were diagnosed during 2000 to 2002 with PCa, who underwent radical prostatectomy or PLND without radical prostatectomy, and who were diagnosed in regions covered by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (n = 40,848).

RESULTS:

Black men were less likely to undergo PLND than white men (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84‐0.98). When the analysis was stratified by PCa grade, black men with well differentiated PCa (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27‐0.84) and poorly differentiated PCa (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60‐0.89) were less likely to undergo PLND than their white counterparts, but racial differences were not observed among men with moderately differentiated PCa (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.88‐1.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among men with poorly differentiated PCa, failure to undergo PLND was associated with worse survival. Racial disparities in the receipt of PLND, especially among men with poorly differentiated PCa, may contribute to racial differences in prostate cancer survival. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

The association of race/ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic factors with breast cancer care

BACKGROUND:

Few data are available on how race/ethnicity, insurance, and socioeconomic status (SES) interrelate to influence breast cancer treatment. The authors examined care for a national cohort of breast cancer patients to assess whether insurance and SES were associated with racial/ethnic differences in care.

METHODS:

The authors used multivariate logistic regression to assess the probability of definitive locoregional therapy, hormone receptor testing, and adjuvant systemic therapy among 662,117 white, black, and Hispanic women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during 1998‐2005 at National Cancer Data Base hospitals. In additional models, the authors included insurance and area‐level SES to determine whether these variables were associated with observed racial/ethnic disparities.

RESULTS:

Most women were white (86%), 10% were black, and 4% were Hispanic. Most had private insurance (51%) or Medicare (41%). Among eligible patients, 80.0% (stage I/II) had definitive locoregional therapy, 98.5% (stage I‐IV) had hormone receptor testing, and 53.1% and 50.2% (stage I‐III) received adjuvant hormonal therapy and chemotherapy, respectively. After adjustment, black (vs white) women had less definitive locoregional therapy (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88‐0.94), hormonal therapy (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87‐0.93), and chemotherapy (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84‐0.91). Hispanic (vs white) women were also less likely to receive hormonal therapy. Hormone receptor testing did not differ by race/ethnicity. Racial disparities persisted despite adjusting for insurance and SES.

CONCLUSIONS:

The modest association between black (vs white) race and guideline‐recommended breast cancer care was insensitive to adjustment for insurance and area‐level SES. Further study is required to better understand disparities and to ensure receipt of care. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Racial treatment trends in localized/regional prostate carcinoma: 1992-1999

BACKGROUND: African-American men have a greater incidence of and mortality from prostate carcinoma compared with white men, and they are less likely to receive definitive therapy (radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy). During the 1990s, the use of brachytherapy increased; however, its influence on racial and ethnic prostate carcinoma treatment trends remains unclear. The objective of this study was to describe treatment trends over the period 1992-1999 for localized/regional prostate carcinoma among white, Hispanic, and African-American men. METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data from 1992 through 1999, logistic regression models were used to determine whether the odds of receiving a specific treatment modality differed by racial and ethnic group and whether the differences changed over time when the models were adjusted for age, marital status, tumor grade, and SEER site (geography). RESULTS: The authors identified 142,340 men, including white men (81.6%), Hispanic men (6.4%), and African-American men (12.0%). Racial and ethnic differences in the rates of use of androgen-deprivation therapy/expectant management were noted; however, these differences appeared to lessen over time (P < 0.001). The rate of utilization of radical prostatectomy increased for Hispanic men, remained flat for African-American men, and decreased for white men. The utilization of brachytherapy and combination therapy increased for all three groups; however, the greatest increase in utilization was among white men. CONCLUSIONS: Further research will be required to determine the patient-level and provider-level variables that influence racial and ethnic treatment differences in localized/regional prostate cancer.     

Variation in quality of care among older men with localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to assess the racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes and their association with process‐of‐care measures for elderly Medicare recipients with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS:

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results‐Medicare databases for the period from 1995 to 2003 were used to identify African‐American men, non‐Hispanic white men, and Hispanic men with localized prostate cancer, and data were obtained for the 1‐year period before the diagnosis of prostate cancer and up to 8 years postdiagnosis. The short‐term outcomes of interest were complications, emergency room visits, readmissions, and mortality; the long‐term outcomes of interest were prostate cancer‐specific mortality and all‐cause mortality; and process‐of‐care measures of interest were treatment and time to treatment. Cox proportional hazards regression, logistic regression, and Poisson regression were used to study the racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes and their association with process‐of‐care measures.

RESULTS:

Compared with non‐Hispanic white patients, African‐American patients (Hazard ration [HR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CE], 1.19‐1.86) and Hispanic patients (HR=1.39; 95% CI, 1.03‐1.84) had greater hazard of long term prostate specific mortality. African‐American patients also had greater odds of emergency room visits (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2‐1.7) and greater all‐cause mortality (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.3‐1.5) compared with white patients. The time to treatment was longer for African‐American patients and was indicative of a greater hazard of all‐cause, long‐term mortality. Hispanic patients who underwent surgery or received radiation had a greater hazard of long‐term prostate‐specific mortality compared with white patients who received hormone therapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes were associated with process‐of‐care measures (the type and time to treatment). The current results indicated that there is an opportunity to reduce these disparities by addressing these process‐of‐care measures. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Explaining racial differences in prostate cancer mortality

BACKGROUND:

In the United States, black males have an annual death rate from prostate cancer that is 2.4 times that of white males. The reasons for this are poorly understood.

METHODS:

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database, 77,038 black and white males aged >65 years were identified with a first primary diagnosis of prostate cancer between 1995 and 2005, as well as 49,769 controls. The racial gap in mortality was decomposed to differential incidence and stage‐specific prostate cancer mortality. The importance of various clinical and socioeconomic factors to each of these components was then examined.

RESULTS:

The estimated mortality gap for prostate cancer–specific mortality was 1320 more cases per 100,000 males among black than white men. This gap was due to higher prostate cancer incidence among black males (76%) and higher stage‐specific mortality once diagnosed (24%). Differences in prostate‐specific antigen testing, comorbidities, and income explained 29% of the difference in metastatic cancer incidence but none of the racial gap for local/regional incidence. Conditional on diagnosis, tumor characteristics explained 50% of the racial gap, comorbidities an additional 4%, choice of treatment and physician 17%, and socioeconomic factors 15%. Overall, approximately 25% of the racial gap in mortality and 86% of the gap in mortality conditional on diagnosis could be explained.

CONCLUSIONS:

More frequent prostate‐specific antigen testing for black and low‐income males could potentially reduce the prostate cancer mortality gap through earlier diagnosis of tumors that otherwise may become metastatic. More aggressive treatment of prostate cancer, especially in poor communities, might also reduce the gap. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Racial/ethnic disparities in survival among men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Texas

BACKGROUND:

To the authors' knowledge, few studies to date have examined racial differences in prostate cancer survival while controlling for socioeconomic status (SES). No such studies have examined this association in Texas, a large state with significant ethnic and racial diversity. The objective of this analysis was to determine whether racial disparities in survival for men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Texas from 1995 through 2002 remained after adjusting for SES, rural residence, and stage of disease.

METHODS:

A cohort of 87,449 men who were diagnosed with prostate cancer was identified from the Texas Cancer Registry. The SES measure was based on census tract data reflecting median household income, median home value, and percentages of men living below poverty, with a college education, and with a management or professional occupation. The 5‐year survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for race and all‐cause and disease‐specific mortality.

RESULTS:

After adjusting for SES, age, stage of disease, tumor grade, year of diagnosis, and rural residence, both black and Hispanic men were more likely (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.70 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.58‐1.83] and aHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.02‐1.20], respectively) to die of prostate cancer compared with white men. The pattern of survival disadvantage for black men held for those diagnosed with localized disease and advanced disease, and for those with an unknown stage of disease at diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Substantial racial disparities in prostate cancer survival were found for men in Texas. Future studies should incorporate treatment data as well as comorbid conditions because this information may explain noted survival disparities. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Contemporary prostate cancer radiation therapy in the United States: Patterns of care and compliance with quality measures

Purpose

Quality measures represent the standards of appropriate treatment agreed upon by experts in the field and often supported by data. The extent to which providers in the community adhere to quality measures in radiation therapy (RT) is unknown.

Race, healthcare access and physician trust among prostate cancer patients

Objective

To study the effect of healthcare access and other characteristics on physician trust among black and white prostate cancer patients.

Methods

A three-timepoint follow-up telephone survey after cancer diagnosis was conducted. This study analyzed data on 474 patients and their 1,320 interviews over three time periods.

Results

Among other subpopulations, black patients who delayed seeking care had physician trust levels that were far lower than that of both Caucasians as well as that of the black patients overall. Black patients had greater variability in their levels of physician trust compared to their white counterparts.

Conclusions

Both race and access are important in explaining overall lower levels and greater variability in physician trust among black prostate cancer patients. Access barriers among black patients may spill over to the clinical encounter in the form of less physician trust, potentially contributing to racial disparities in treatment received and subsequent outcomes. Policy efforts to address the racial disparities in prostate cancer should prioritize improving healthcare access among minority groups.     

Major 30‐day complications after radical radiotherapy

BACKGROUND:

Radiotherapy (RT) is used commonly to treat localized prostate cancer, particularly among older men and men with comorbid illnesses. Few population‐based studies have reported on the rates of major short‐term complications that lead to hospitalization after radiotherapy.

METHODS:

In this study, the authors identified all men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer who received RT between 1990 and 1999 in Ontario, Canada. Patients who underwent a prior prostate‐directed surgery were excluded. Mortality and complications after RT were examined by using administrative data. A comprehensive list of 7 categories of complications was developed by combining published lists from radical prostatectomy series with input from experts. Logistic regression was used to analyze the relations between complications (that occurred within 30 days of RT) and clinical factors. A similar analysis was performed among men who underwent radical prostatectomy during the same period.

RESULTS:

There were 7661 men (mean age, 69 years) identified who received RT. Nine patients (0.1%) died within 30 days of RT. Any complication within 30 days of RT was experienced by 6.5% of patients. In analyses that were adjusted for year of treatment, increasing age was associated with any, respiratory, bleeding, genitourinary, and miscellaneous medical complications (P<.02) but not with cardiac, vascular, or bowel complications. Over time, any, cardiac, vascular, and genitourinary complications decreased, but the other 4 categories of complications did not decrease. Despite being older and having more comorbidity, men who received RT had lower complication rates in each category compared with 11,010 men who underwent radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Short‐term complications that required hospital‐based management were relatively uncommon after RT, commonly increased with patient age, and generally declined over time. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Mortality in men with localized prostate cancer treated with brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant hormone therapy

BACKGROUND:

Discrepancies exist regarding the impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) on the risk of all‐cause mortality (ACM) in men who receive brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to examine the effect of NHT on the risk of ACM in men with prostate cancer who receive with brachytherapy.

METHODS:

The study cohort included 2474 men with localized prostate cancer who either received NHT (N = 1083) or did not receive NHT (N = 1391) and brachytherapy without supplemental external beam radiation between 1991 and 2005 at centers within the 21st Century Oncology Consortium. All men had at least 2 years of follow‐up. Low‐risk, intermediate‐risk, and high‐risk disease was present in 65%, 23%, and 12% of men, respectively. A Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the risk of ACM in men who received NHT compared with all others adjusting for age, prostate‐specific antigen level, Gleason score, and tumor classification.

RESULTS:

After a median follow‐up of 4.8 years (interquartile range, 3.3‐7.5 years) and adjusting for known prostate cancer prognostic factors and age, treatment with NHT was associated significantly with an increased risk of ACM (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.01‐1.53; P = .04) in men aged ≥73 years. In men who were younger than the median age of 73 years, hormone therapy use was not significant (P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with men who were younger than the median age of 73 years, men aged ≥73 years with localized prostate cancer who received brachytherapy and NHT had an increased risk of ACM compared with men who did not receive NHT. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Patterns of Care of Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Patients Across the United States: A National Cancer Data Base Analysis

Background

Twelve percent of newly diagnosed prostate cancers in the United States are node-positive. In a setting of disparate treatment guideline recommendations for node-positive disease, this study describes the treatment patterns for clinical node-positive (cN⁺) and pathologic node-positive (pN⁺) patients across the United States.

Racial segregation and disparities in breast cancer care and mortality

BACKGROUND.

Questions have existed as to whether residential segregation is a mediator of racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer care and breast cancer mortality, or has a differential effect by race/ethnicity.

METHODS.

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database on white, black, and Hispanic women aged 66 to 85 years with breast cancer were examined for the receipt of adequate breast cancer care.

RESULTS.

Blacks were less likely than whites to receive adequate breast cancer care (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71‐0.86). Individuals, both black and white, who lived in areas with greater black segregation were less likely to receive adequate breast cancer care (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64‐0.82). Black segregation was a mediator of the black/white disparity in breast cancer care, explaining 8.9% of the difference. After adjustment, adequate care for Hispanics did not significantly differ from whites, but individuals, both Hispanic and white, who lived in areas with greater Hispanic segregation were less likely to receive adequate breast cancer care (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61‐0.89). Although Blacks experienced greater breast cancer mortality than whites, black segregation did not substantially mediate the black‐white disparity in survival, and was not significantly associated with mortality (hazards ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.87‐1.21). Breast cancer mortality did not differ between Hispanics and whites.

CONCLUSIONS.

Among seniors, segregation mediates some of the black‐white disparity in breast cancer care, but not mortality. Individuals who live in more segregated areas are less likely to receive adequate breast cancer care. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.     

Costs of medical care after open or minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: a population-based analysis

BACKGROUND:

Evidence suggests that minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MRP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) have similar short‐term clinical and functional outcomes. MRP with robotic assistance is generally more expensive than ORP, but it is not clear whether subsequent costs of care vary by approach.

METHODS:

In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry linked with Medicare claims, men aged 66 years or older who received MRP or ORP in 2003 through 2006 for prostate cancer were identified. Total cost of care was estimated as the sum of Medicare payments from all claims for hospital care, outpatient care, physician services, home health and hospice care, and durable medical equipment in the first year from the date of surgical admission. The impact of surgical approach on costs was estimated, controlling for patient and disease characteristics.

RESULTS:

Of 5445 surgically treated prostate cancer patients, 4454 (82%) had ORP and 991 (18%) had MRP. Mean total first‐year costs were more than $1200 greater for MRP compared with ORP ($16,919 vs $15,692; P = .08). Controlling for patient and disease characteristics, MRP was associated with 2% greater mean total payments, but this difference was not statistically significant. First‐year costs were greater for men who were older, black, lived in the Northeast, had lymph node involvement, more advanced tumor stage, or greater comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this population‐based cohort of older men, MRP and ORP had similar economic outcomes. From a payer's perspective, any benefits associated with MRP may not translate to net savings compared with ORP in the first year after surgery. Cancer 2012;118: 3079–86. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

A new approach to understanding racial disparities in prostate cancer treatment

Objective:Previous studies addressing racial disparities in treatment for early-stage prostate cancer have focused on the etiology of undertreatment of black men. Our objective was to determine whether racial disparities are attributable to undertreatment, overtreatment, or both.Methods:Using the SEER-Medicare dataset, we identified men 67–84 years-old diagnosed with localized prostate cancer from 1998 to 2007. We stratified men into clinical benefit groups using tumor aggressiveness and life expectancy. Low-benefit was defined as low-risk tumors and life expectancy < 10 years; high-benefit as moderate-risk tumors and life expectancy ≥ 10 years; all others were intermediate-benefit. Logistic regression modeled the association between race and treatment (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy) across benefit groups.Results:Of 68,817 men (9.8% black and 90.2% white), 56.2% of black and 66.3% of white men received treatment (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.62–0.69). The percent of low-, intermediate-, and high-benefit men who received treatment was 56.7%, 68.4%, and 79.6%, respectively (P = < 0.001). In the low-benefit group, 51.9% of black vs. 57.2% of white patients received treatment (OR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67–0.81) compared to 57.2% vs. 69.6% in the intermediate-benefit group (OR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59–0.70). Racial disparity was largest in the high-benefit group (64.2% of black vs. 81.4% of white patients received treatment; OR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48–0.68). The interaction between race and clinical benefit was significant (P < 0.001).Conclusion:Racial disparities were largest among men most likely to benefit from treatment. However, a substantial proportion of both black and white men with a low clinical benefit received treatment, indicating a high level of overtreatment.     

Neutrophil,lymphocyte and platelet counts,and risk of prostate cancer outcomes in white and black men: results from the SEARCH database

Purpose

Systemic inflammation, as measured by C-reactive protein, has been linked with poor prostate cancer (PC) outcomes, predominantly in white men. Whether other immune measures like white blood cell counts are correlated with PC progression and whether results vary by race is unknown. We examined whether complete blood count (CBC) parameters were associated with PC outcomes and whether these associations varied by race.

Methods

Analyses include 1,826 radical prostatectomy patients from six VA hospitals followed through medical record review for biochemical recurrence (BCR). Secondary outcomes included castration-resistant PC (CRPC), metastasis, all-cause mortality (ACM), and PC-specific mortality (PCSM). Cox-proportional hazards were used to assess the associations between pre-operative neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with each outcome. We used a Bonferroni-corrected p-value of 0.05/5?=?0.01 as the threshold for statistical significance.

Results

Of 1,826 men, 794 (43%) were black and 1,032 (57%) white. Neutrophil count (p?<?0.001), NLR (p?<?0.001), and PLR (p?<?0.001) were significantly lower, while lymphocyte count (p?<?0.001) was significantly higher in black versus white men. After adjusting for clinicopathological features, no CBC measures were significantly associated with BCR. There were no interactions between CBC and race in predicting BCR. Similarly, no CBC values were significantly associated with CRPC, metastases, or PCSM either among all men or when stratified by race. However, higher neutrophil count was associated with higher ACM risk in white men (p?=?0.004).

Conclusion

Pre-operative CBC measures were not associated with PC outcomes in black or white men undergoing radical prostatectomy, except for neutrophils-positive association with risk of ACM in white men. Whether circulating immune cell markers provide insight to the pathophysiology of PC progression or adverse treatment outcomes requires further study.

     

Bone density testing among prostate cancer survivors treated with androgen‐deprivation therapy

BACKGROUND.

Androgen‐deprivation therapy (ADT) causes bone loss and fractures. Guidelines recommend bone density testing before and during ADT to characterize fracture risk. The authors of the current report assessed bone density testing among men who received ADT for ≥ 1 year.

METHODS.

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results/Medicare data were used to identify 28,960 men aged > 65 years with local/regional prostate cancer diagnosed from 2001 to 2007 who were followed through 2009 and who received ≥ 1 year of continuous ADT. Bone density testing was documented in the 18‐month period beginning 6 months before ADT initiation. Logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with bone density testing.

RESULTS.

Among men who received ≥ 1 year of ADT, 10.2% had a bone density assessment from 6 months before starting ADT through 1 year after. Bone density testing increased over time (14.5% of men who initiated ADT in 2007‐2008 vs 6% of men who initiated ADT in 2001‐2002; odds ratio for 2007‐2008 vs 2001‐2002, 2.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.83‐2.85). Less bone density testing was observed among men aged ≥ 85 years versus men ages 66 to 69 years (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.65‐0.89), among black men versus white men (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.61‐0.86), and among men in areas with lower educational attainment (P < .001). Men who visited a medical oncologist and/or a primary care provider in addition to a urologist had higher odds of testing than men who only consulted a urologist (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS.

Few men who received ADT for prostate cancer underwent bone density testing, particularly older men, black men, and those living in areas with low educational attainment. Visiting a medical oncologist was associated with increased odds of testing. Interventions are needed to increase bone density testing among men who receive long‐term ADT. Data on bone density testing for nonmilitary populations of prostate cancer survivors in the United States who have received long‐term androgen‐deprivation therapy (ADT) have not been published. The current analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results/Medicare data suggests that few prostate cancer survivors who receive long‐term ADT undergo bone density testing; and several key populations, including African Americans and older men, have considerably lower rates of bone density screening. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Prostate cancer treatment for economically disadvantaged men

BACKGROUND.

The authors compared the types of treatments prostate cancer patients received from county hospitals and private providers as part of a statewide public assistance program.

METHODS.

This was a cohort study of 559 men enrolled in a state‐funded program for low‐income patients known as Improving Access, Counseling, and Treatment for Californians With Prostate Cancer (IMPACT). Multinomial regression was used to compare types of treatments patients received from different providers.

RESULTS.

Between 2001 and 2006, 315 (56%) participants received treatment from county hospitals and 244 (44%) from private providers. There were no significant between‐group differences with respect to age (P = .22), enrollment year (P = .49), Charlson comorbidity index (P = .47), Gleason sum (P = .33), clinical T stage (P = .36), prostate‐specific antigen (P = .39), or D'Amico risk criteria (P = .45). Participants treated by private providers were more likely than those treated in county hospitals to be white (35% vs 10%, P < .01) and less likely to undergo surgery (29% vs 54%, P < .01). Multinomial regression analyses showed that participants treated by private providers were nearly 2½ times more likely than those treated by public providers to receive radiotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 2.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37‐4.07) and >4½ times more likely to receive primary androgen deprivation (OR, 4.71; 95% CI, 2.15‐10.36) than surgery.

CONCLUSIONS.

In this economically disadvantaged cohort, prostate cancer treatments differed significantly between county hospitals and private providers. These data reveal substantial variations in treatment patterns between different types of healthcare institutions that—given the implications for health policy and quality of care—merit further scrutiny. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Association between exercise and primary incidence of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

Exercise is a modifiable lifestyle risk factor associated with prostate cancer risk reduction. However, whether this association is different as a function of race is unclear. In the current study, the authors attempted to characterize the link between exercise and prostate cancer (CaP) in white and black American men.

METHODS:

Using a prospective design, 307 men (164 of whom were white and 143 of whom were black) who were undergoing prostate biopsy completed a self‐reported survey that assessed exercise behavior (metabolic equivalent [MET] hours per week). Crude and adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the risk of prostate cancer controlling for age, body mass index, digital rectal examination findings, previous biopsy, Charlson comorbidity score, and family history of CaP stratified by self‐reported race.

RESULTS:

There was no significant difference noted with regard to the amount of exercise between racial groups (P = .12). Higher amounts of MET hours per week were associated with a decreased risk of CaP for white men in both crude (P = .02) and adjusted (P = .04) regression models. Among whites, men who exercised ≥ 9 MET hours per week were less likely to have a positive biopsy result compared with men exercising < 9 MET hours per week (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.22‐0.99 [P = .047]). There was no association noted between MET hours per week and risk of CaP among black men in both crude (P = .79) and adjusted (P = .76) regression models.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a prospective cohort of men undergoing biopsy, increased exercise, measured as MET hours per week, was found to be associated with CaP risk reduction among white but not black men. Investigating race‐specific mechanisms by which exercise modifies CaP risk and why these mechanisms disfavor black men in particular are warranted. Cancer 2013. © 2013 American Cancer Society.     

The association of robotic surgical technology and hospital prostatectomy volumes: increasing market share through the adoption of technology

BACKGROUND:

Despite limited and conflicting evidence for the efficacy of newly developed robotic technology for laparoscopic prostatectomy, this technology is spreading rapidly. Because the newer technology is more costly, reasons for this rapid adoption are unclear. The authors of this report sought to determine whether hospital acquisition of robotic technology was associated with volume of prostate cancer surgery.

METHODS:

The inpatient dataset of claims records from 2002 to 2008 and the acquisition dates of robotic technology were used to examine the rates of prostatectomy in Wisconsin hospitals. In analyses that accounted for hospital and referral region characteristics, changes in hospital prostatectomy volume were examined for their association with technology acquisition. Overall trends in the rate of prostatectomy also were examined over the study period.

RESULTS:

In total, 10,021 prostatectomies were performed in 52 hospitals in Wisconsin's 8 health referral regions during the study period. The mean quarterly prostatectomy volume in hospitals that did not acquire the technology was 4.5 in 2002 and 3.1 in 2007/2008. In contrast, the mean quarterly prostatectomy volume in hospitals that went on to acquire robotic technology was 16.5 in 2002 and 24.8 in 2007/2008. In adjusted models, the acquisition of a robot was associated with a 114% annual increase (95% confidence interval, 62%‐177% annual increase) in hospital prostatectomy volume. The average Wisconsin hospital prostatectomy volume was unchanged during 2002 through 2006 but increased by 25.6% in 2007.

CONCLUSIONS:

Robotic technology acquisition occurred rapidly in Wisconsin hospitals, and hospitals that acquired a robot had large increases in prostatectomy volume. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.