Lenograstim: a review of its use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, for acceleration of neutrophil recovery following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

Lenograstim (Granocyte?, Neutrogin?, Myelostim?) is a glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. This article reviews the pharmacological properties, therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of lenograstim, mainly focusing on its use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, acceleration of neutrophil recovery following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in patients with cancer and healthy donors. In randomized, multicentre trials in patients with solid tumours, lymphoma or multiple myeloma, the durations of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, hospitalization for infection and intravenous antibacterial therapy were significantly shorter in patients receiving lenograstim prophylaxis than in those receiving placebo. The time to neutrophil recovery was also significantly shorter in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who received lenograstim than in those who received placebo or no treatment, according to the results of randomized, multicentre trials. In addition, lenograstim prophylaxis facilitated the administration of dose-intense or dose-dense chemotherapy regimens, with improved clinical outcomes seen in some trials. In patients with cancer undergoing HSCT, lenograstim accelerated neutrophil recovery post-HSCT and shortened the duration of hospitalization, according to the results of randomized, multicentre trials. Lenograstim effectively mobilized PBSCs in patients with cancer, demonstrating generally similar efficacy to filgrastim or molgramostim in five randomized trials (although lower dosages of lenograstim than filgrastim were administered in four of the trials). Lenograstim also provided effective PBSC mobilization in healthy donors and was more effective than filgrastim when both drugs were administered at a dosage of 10?μg/kg/day. The efficacy and safety of lenograstim for PBSC mobilization in healthy donors was supported by the results of a prospective, longer-term study involving almost 4000 healthy donors. Lenograstim was generally well tolerated across a variety of treatment settings, including PBSC mobilization in healthy donors, with bone pain being one of the most commonly reported adverse events. In conclusion, lenograstim remains an important option for use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, acceleration of neutrophil recovery following HSCT, and PBSC mobilization.     

Cost-benefit analysis of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during CHOP antineoplastic therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Several randomised comparative trials have shown that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the duration of neutropenia, hospitalisation and intravenous antibacterial use in patients with cancer who are receiving high-dosage antineoplastic therapy. However, one area that has received less attention is the role of G-CSF in standard-dosage antineoplastic regimens. One such treatment that is considered to have a low potential for inducing fever and neutropenia is the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. We conducted a cost-benefit analysis from a societal perspective in order to estimate the net cost or benefit of prophylactic G-CSF in this patient population. This included direct costs for hospitalisation with antibacterial support, as well as indirect societal costs, such as time off work and antineoplastic therapy delays secondary to neutropenia. The findings were then tested by a comprehensive sensitivity analysis. The administration of G-CSF at a dosage of 5 micrograms/kg/day for 11 doses following CHOP resulted in an overall net cost of $Can1257. In the sensitivity analysis, lowering the G-CSF dosage to 2 micrograms/kg/day generated a net benefit of $Can6564, indicating a situation that was cost saving to society. The results of the current study suggest that the use of G-CSF in patients receiving CHOP antineoplastic therapy produces a situation that is close to achieving cost neutrality. However, low-dosage (2 micrograms/kg/day) G-CSF is an economically attractive treatment strategy because it may result in overall savings to society.     

Capillary electrophoretic separation of poly(ethylene glycol)-modified granulocyte-colony stimulating factor

We evaluated the utility of capillary electrophoretic methods for analyzing poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-modified granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), a long-acting form of GCSF for the treatment of cancer therapy-induced neutropenia. Low- and high-molecularweight PEG-G-CSF conjugates prepared with aldehyde-activated PEG-5K and PEG-20K were separated by high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HP-SEC), capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), and sodium dodecyl sulfate-capillary gel electrophoresis (SDS-CGE). HPSEC showed low resolution for separating mono- and di-PEG-G-CSFs. SDS-CGE had higher resolution, but required a long analysis and had low peak efficiency. CZE could successfully separate both PEG-5K- and PEG-20K-conjugated G-CSFs with a running time of 20 min and high peak efficiency. In conclusion, CZE was better than SDS-CGE for separating PEG-G-CSF conjugates and will be useful for PEGylation studies, such as reaction monitoring for optimization of the PEGylation reaction, and purity and stability tests of PEG-G-CSF.     

Therapeutic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors for established febrile neutropenia: effect on costs from a hospital perspective

BACKGROUND: The prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) reduces the severity and duration of neutropenia and reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia after cancer chemotherapy. However, the use of G-CSFs, particularly filgrastim, to treat established neutropenia remains controversial. A recent meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating G-CSF treatment for established febrile neutropenia demonstrated a reduction in prolonged hospitalisations. Because more than one-third of patients in the analysis were hospitalised for at least 10 days, this finding has broad pharmacoeconomic and clinical significance. This analysis presents the potential cost implications of G-CSF treatment for established neutropenia among hospitalised patients. METHODS: Direct medical costs ($US, year 2003 values) related to hospitalisation for established neutropenia were modelled using a hospital perspective and according to two treatment options: (i) no use of G-CSF during the neutropenic episode (control); and (ii) addition of daily G-CSF until neutrophil recovery. Within each option, we modelled the probability of a long stay (>or=10 days) and patient survival. The model used three data sets: discharge data from a consortium of academic medical institutions, drug cost data (filgrastim) from Federal payers, and estimates of G-CSF efficacy derived from a meta-analysis of RCTs of treatment in patients with established febrile neutropenia. The lowest expected total cost was predicted for both treatment options; sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations were used to evaluate the robustness of the model. RESULTS: The G-CSF arm produced the lowest expected cost, and predicted net estimated savings of $US1046 per neutropenic episode compared with the control strategy. G-CSF was less expensive than the control for most reasonable estimates of cost per day and all lengths of stay (LOS) >or=10 days. G-CSF was the least costly strategy for 73.5% of 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations, while the no-G-CSF control strategy predicted savings in 26.5% of iterations. CONCLUSIONS: This pharmacoeconomic model suggests that therapeutic use of G-CSF should be considered for patients with established neutropenia in order to reduce overall hospital cost. G-CSF treatment may offer substantial potential savings for hospitalised patients with established neutropenia over a wide range of model assumptions. Therapeutic G-CSF use among patients hospitalised for established neutropenia may complement the recommended prophylactic use of these agents for the prevention of neutropenic episodes.     

Granulocyte colony--stimulating factor for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with small cell lung cancer : the 40% rule revisited

Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) [filgrastim and lenograstim] and pegylated G-CSF (pegfilgrastim) have been shown to reduce the severity and duration of chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia (FN) when administered prophylactically to cancer patients receiving chemotherapeutic regimens. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) evidence-based clinical guidelines published in 1994, 1996 and 1997 recommended primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for cancer patients. The 2000 ASCO update, with the same recommendation, highlights the importance of economic considerations in decision making for CSFs. This paper reviews the available cost-effectiveness evidence on the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis against FN in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).Cost-effectiveness ratios from a healthcare payer perspective supported the use of filgrastim as primary prophylaxis for people with SCLC, on the basis of both clinical and economic benefits, treated with chemotherapeutic regimens that have an FN rate in the range of 40-60%. However, when indirect and patient out-of-pocket costs attributable to severe FN are included, available evidence suggests that the risk threshold may be reduced by more than half.Given that FN rates associated with chemotherapeutic regimens for SCLC are generally <40%, then few circumstances would warrant the use of G-CSFs (filgrastim and lenograstim) under the current rule. However, inclusion of indirect costs would lower the cost-effectiveness threshold. Future cost-effectiveness studies of medications such as pegfilgrastim should attempt to capture the societal perspective by incorporating productivity-related costs and using base-case rates of FN reported in the literature.     

Amelioration of neutrophil membrane function underlies granulocyte-colony stimulating factor action in glycogen storage disease 1b

Glycogen storage disease (GSD) 1b is a metabolic disorder characterized by a deficiency of glucose 6-phosphate transporter and neutrophil alterations, which are reduced in number and functionally impaired. The present study aimed at investigating neutrophil dysfunction correlating submembrane and cytoskeletal changes at different ages with or without granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment. GSD1b neutrophils showed reduced expression and diffused localization of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and actin. No abnormalities were observed in GSD1a patient neutrophils. Gelsolin was also slightly reduced in neutrophils of GSD1b patients. When patients were treated for at least 3 months with G-CSF, the neutrophil number and the expression of FAK and actin were significantly increased. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment was similarly effective when performed in 1 year old patients. FAK auto- and IL-8-mediated phosphorylations were already affected as early as 1 year of age. G-CSF treatment also improved this alteration. Our data suggest that neutrophil dysfunction in GSD1b patients might be related to functional impairment and disorganization of proteins of the sub-membrane apparatus, and that G-CSF treatment counteracts neutropenia and prevents the progressive alterations of neutrophil sub-membrane proteins.     

Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim on haematological effects after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with high-dose chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of lenograstim and filgrastim on haematological recovery following an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) with high-dose chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective case-controlled study. RESULTS: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery above 0.5 x 10(9)/l and white blood cell (WBC) recovery above 4 x 10(9)/l for 3 consecutive days was achieved earlier with filgrastim than with lenograstim ((13.2 +/- 8.0 vs 19.0 +/- 10.0 days, p = 0.004), (16.9 +/- 9.7 vs 29.9 +/- 16.6 days, p = 0.001), respectively). The platelet recovery above 20 x 10(9)/l was also achieved earlier with filgrastim than with lenograstim (19.5 +/- 11.6 vs 27.2 +/- 13.8 days, p = 0.006). Furthermore, filgrastim-treated patients received fewer days of granulocyte colony simulating factor (G-CSF) administration (12.5 +/- 7.0 vs 18.6 +/- 8.5 days, p = 0.001) and spent less time in hospital (23.7 +/- 10.9 vs 32.0 +/- 17.6 days, p = 0.009). Duration of antibiotic administration was also significantly shorter in the filgrastim group (13.6 +/- 7.6 vs 29.1 +/- 19.8 days, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PBSCT following high-dose chemotherapy, filgrastim significantly reduced the duration of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and days of G-CSF administration, and led to earlier hospital discharge compared with lenograstim.     

Lenograstim: an update of its pharmacological properties and use in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and related clinical settings

Lenograstim is the glycosylated recombinant form of human granulocyte colony stimulating factor. The drug is used to reduce the risk of life-threatening infection in patients with neutropenia, particularly after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Lenograstim accelerates neutrophil recovery significantly after chemotherapy, with beneficial effects on clinical end-points such as incidence of laboratory-confirmed infection and length of hospital stay. Chemotherapy dose intensity has also been increased in patients receiving lenograstim, notably those with breast or small cell lung cancer, although improvements in tumour response and survival have not been demonstrated. Lenograstim also assists neutrophil recovery in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, and stimulates the production of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous transfusion after aggressive chemotherapy. Lenograstim also mobilises CD34+ cells more efficiently in unit dose terms than filgrastim and has been used successfully to mobilise PBSCs from healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. Randomised trials have shown increases in rates of disease remission after lenograstim therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, with no evidence of stimulation of malignant blasts. The drug has also shown potential in the mobilisation of nonmalignant PBSCs for autotransplantation in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Other studies show efficacy of lenograstim in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, aplastic anaemia, in children with severe chronic neutropenia and in the reversal of neutropenia related to antiviral therapy in patients with AIDS, although data are not extensive. Cost analyses of lenograstim have been carried out from a hospital perspective, although results have been inconclusive. Cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit data are lacking at present. Lenograstim is well tolerated, with bone pain and injection site reactions being reported most frequently in clinical trials. Conclusions: Lenograstim has been confirmed as a valuable adjunct to minimise the haematological toxicity of myelosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with malignant disease. The drug also enhances neutrophil recovery in patients undergoing stem cell rescue, and assists PBSC mobilisation. Data indicate clinical benefit with lenograstim in myeloid disorders, with no evidence of malignant blast cell proliferation. Further studies are required to assess more fully the pharmacoeconomic implications of the use of lenograstim and other recombinant growth factors, to provide more data on the efficacy of the drug in the management of disease-related neutropenia, and to clarify fully its position relative to filgrastim.     

Effect of lenograstim on the cost of autologous bone marrow transplantation. A preliminary communication

High dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) can produce prolonged remission in patients with malignant lymphoma or solid tumours. However, neutropenia is a serious complication of treatment in patients with these diseases. In this study, we investigated the costs and effects of using lenograstim, a recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, to treat neutropenia in 16 patients with lymphoma or solid tumours. The cost of lenograstim was not included in the calculations. The duration of neutropenia and hospitalisation were both lower in patients who received lenograstim compared with no treatment. The mean cost of autologous BMT was FF142,000 in patients who received lenograstim, compared with FF166,000 in patients who did not. Savings were largely attributable to decreased expenditure on hospitalisation in the lenograstim-treated group. The cost of 14 days' treatment with lenograstim was estimated at FF10,500, based on a daily dosage of 150 micrograms/m2/day.     

粒系集落刺激因子对进展型多发性硬化患者造血干细胞的动员效果及安全性

目的：观察粒系集落刺激因子（G-CSF）对进展型多发性硬化（MS）患者造血干细胞动员效果及安全性。方法：34例继发进展型MS患者纳入研究,给予G-CSF5μg/（kg·d）4～6d动员自体造血干细胞。动员后经血细胞分离机收集外周血单个核细胞。应用流式细胞术检测CD34^＋细胞和单个核细胞绝对数,并观察应用G-CSF后不良反应的类型和发生率。于动员前及动员后分别评定患者的扩展残疾状态评分（expanded disability status scale,EDSS）。结果：采集物中CD34＋细胞为（2.68±0.89）×106/kg,单个核细胞为（2.98±1.19）×108/kg。移植后中性粒细胞恢复至〉0.5×10^9/L的中位时间为13d（9～17d）,血小板恢复至〉50×10^9/L的中位时间为16d（11～21d）。移植相关死亡率为0。在G-CSF动员过程中有17例患者（50%）出现肌痛及乏力症状,未用药物治疗症状消退。2例患者在用药期间EDSS评分增加0.5分,与动员前相比差异无统计学意义（P=0.16）。结论：对于自体造血干细胞移植治疗进展型多发性硬化患者,单用G-CSF动员可以达到有效安全的临床要求。     

Risks and consequences of travel burden on prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration and incidence of febrile neutropenia in an aged Medicare population

Objective: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. This study examines the impact patient travel burden has on administration of prophylactic G-CSFs and the subsequent impact on FN incidence.

Methods: Medicare claims data were used to identify a cohort of beneficiaries age 65+ with non-myeloid cancers at high risk for FN between January 2012 and December 2014. Driving distance and time were calculated from patient residence ZIP code to the location of G-CSF and/or chemotherapy administration. Regression models were used to estimate the odds of G-CSF prophylaxis relative to patient driving distance and time, and odds of FN incidence relative to timing of G-CSF administration (optimal [days 2–4 after chemotherapy], sub-optimal [same day], or none).

Results: The 52,389 study patients had a mean age of 73.5 years, and were 82% female and 89% white race; 49% had female breast cancer, 12% lung cancer, 15% ovarian cancer, and 24% non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Of these high FN risk patients, 69% had at least one prophylactic G-CSF administration within at least one chemotherapy cycle. The percentage of patients receiving prophylactic G-CSFs in the first cycle was 56%. Median travel time was slightly longer for patients who did not receive G-CSFs and patients receiving short-acting vs long-acting G-CSFs. The odds of receiving no G-CSFs were 26–52% higher (depending on cancer type) for patients with a?>80-min one-way travel time, compared to patients traveling <20-min. Concurrently, the odds of FN (using a “narrow” definition) were 18–93% higher for patients who did not receive G-CSFs in the first cycle of chemotherapy.

Conclusions: Travel burden, linked to clinic visits for G-CSF administration following myelosuppressive chemotherapy, is associated with sub-optimal use of G-CSF prophylaxis, which may result in a higher incidence of FN.     

多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血造血干细胞动员的临床分析

目的:探讨多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者使用化疗联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)进行外周血造血干细胞动员的效果及影响因素.方法:将20例MM患者检测采集物中有核细胞数及CD34+细胞数量进行回顾性分析.结果:20例患者共经过44例次单采,自化疗结束至采集日平均时间为10.55(8～14)天.获得有核细胞均数为6.01×108/kg(1.67～14.7×108/kg),CD34+细胞12.49×106/kg(1.9～38×106/kg).仅有2例患者采集物CD34+细胞＜2.5×106/kg.对比两组的临床特征,发现CD34+细胞产率与病程,动员前化疗次数,外周血白细胞恢复时间相关,而与年龄、性别、疾病状态等因素无明显相关性.结论:化疗联合G-CSF方案应用于MM患者中,绝大多数能获得足够的干细胞,对于病程长,化疗次数多动员后血象恢复时间长的患者效果不佳.     

A potential for granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for use as a prophylactic agent for heatstroke in rats

Heatstroke is a form of excessive hyperthermia associated with a systemic inflammatory response that leads to multi-organ dysfunction in which central nervous system disorders predominate. Herein we determined to ascertain whether heat-induced multi-organ dysfunction in rats could be attenuated by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) preconditioning. Anesthetized rats were divided into 2 major groups and given vehicle solution (isotonic saline, 0.3 ml, subcutaneously) or G-CSF (50-200 μg/kg body weight in 0.3 ml normal saline, subcutaneously) daily and consecutively for 5 days before the start of thermal experiments. They were exposed to an ambient temperature of 43°C for 68 min to induce heatstroke. G-CSF preconditioning significantly prolonged the survival time in heatstroke rats in a dose-related way (82-98 min vs 127-243 min). The non-preconditioning heatstroke animals showed hyperthermia, arterial hypotension, increased serum levels of systemic inflammatory response molecules, increased hypothalamic apoptotic cell numbers as well as neuronal damage scores, and increased serum levels of renal and hepatic dysfunction indicators. These heatstroke syndromes could be significantly reduced by G-CSF preconditioning. Thus our results revealed a potential for G-CSF used as a prophylactic agent for heatstroke in rats.     

Biweekly docetaxel and vinorelbine with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer

This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 plus docetaxel 60 mg2/m administered on day 1, every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (G-CSF, 5 microg/kg/day, days 3-7) as primary prophylaxis in patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and previously treated with anthracyclines in the adjuvant or in the first-line setting. A total of 48 patients received 352 cycles (median 8, range 2-10). All patients were included in the efficacy and safety evaluation on an intent-to-treat analysis. Eight patients (17%) showed a complete response and 14 patients (29%) showed a partial response. Overall response rate was 46% [95% confidence interval (CI) 33-60]. The median duration of response was 10.0 months. With a median follow-up of 18.0 months, the median time to progression was 11.9 months and the median overall survival was 27.1 months. The most frequently reported grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia (19% of patients, 4% of cycles). Febrile neutropenia was reported in six patients (13%) and 7 cycles (2%), but no toxic deaths were reported. The most common grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity was asthenia (17% of patients, 6% of cycles) and nail toxicity (15% of patients, 3% of cycles). In conclusion, biweekly docetaxel plus vinorelbine with G-CSF support is active and well tolerated as chemotherapy for patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines. G-CSF support is recommended for lowering the incidence and severity of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia.     

Pharmacokinetics of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) in healthy male volunteers

AIMS: The aim of this open, randomised, crossover, parallel-group study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and neutrophil responses of lenograstim when administered subcutaneously (s.c.) and intravenously (i.v.). METHODS: A total of 27 healthy male volunteers was recruited. Lenograstim doses (0.5, 2, 5, or 10 microg kg(-1)) were administered s.c. or i.v. once-daily for 5 days, and then, after a 10-day washout period, vice versa for a further 5 days. Lenograstim concentrations and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) were measured predosing and postdosing on days 1 and 5. RESULTS: Maximum serum concentrations of lenograstim were higher following i.v. dosing (mean 5.2-185.5 vs 0.7-30.0 ng ml(-1) after s.c. dosing on day 1) and attained sooner (median 0.5-0.8 vs 4.7-8.7 h on day 1). However, apparent elimination half-lives of lenograstim were longer following s.c. dosing (mean 2.3-3.3 vs 0.8-1.2 h after i.v. dosing on days 1 and 5). ANCs increased in a dose-dependent manner with both routes of lenograstim, but more prolonged rises and higher ANC peaks were attained following s.c. doses. ANCs peaked on day 6 following 5 microg kg(-1) s.c. doses (mean peak=26.3x10(9) cells l(-1)), but on day 2 after 5 microg kg(-1) i.v. doses (mean peak = 12.4 x 10(9) cells l(-1)). Irrespective of route, the most common adverse events were headaches and back/spine pain; at doses of up to 5 microg kg(-1) these were mild and generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: While supporting the use of both s.c. and i.v. administered lenograstim to treat neutropenia, these results demonstrate that neutrophil responses are more sustained and prolonged with the s.c. route.     

Treatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Evidence for a stimulation of neovascularization and improvement of myocardial perfusion

BACKGROUND: Stem cell therapy has been suggested to be beneficial in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Strategies of treatment are either a local application of mononuclear bone marrow cells (BMCs) into the infarct-related artery or a systemic therapy with the granulocyte-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilize BMCs. Nevertheless, the mechanisms responsible for improvement of cardiac function and perfusion are speculative at present. This study has been performed to investigate the effect of G-CSF on systemic levels of vascular growth factors and chemokines responsible for neovascularization, that might help to understand the positive effects of a G-CSF therapy after AMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five patients in the treatment group and 5 patients in the control group were enrolled in this study. The patients in the treatment group received 10 microg/kg bodyweight/day of G-CSF subcutaneously for a mean treatment duration of 6.6 +/- 1.1 days. In both groups, levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) were measured on day 2 to 3 and day 5 after AMI. The regional wall perfusion and the ejection fraction (EF) were evaluated before discharge and after 3 months with ECG-gated MIBI-SPECT and radionuclide ventriculography, respectively. Significant higher levels of VEGF (p < 0.01), bFGF (p < 0.05) and MCP-1 (p < 0.05) were found in the treatment group compared to the control group. Levels of VEGF and bFGF remained on a plateau during the G-CSF treatment and decreased significantly in the control group. The wall perfusion improved significantly within the treatment group and between the groups (p < 0.05), respectively. The EF improved significantly within the treatment group (p < 0.05), but the change of the EF between the groups was not significant. CONCLUSION: In patients with AMI, the treatment with G-CSF modulates the formation of vascular growth factors that might improve neovascularization and result in an improved myocardial perfusion and function.     

Comparison of lenograstim and filgrastim on haematological effects after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with high-dose chemotherapy

SUMMARY

Objective: To compare the efficacy of lenograstim and filgrastim on haematological recovery following an autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) with high-dose chemotherapy.

Methods: A retrospective case-controlled study.

Results: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery above 0.5?×?10⁹?l^?1 and white blood cell (WBC) recovery above 4?×?10⁹?l^?1 for 3 consecutive days was achieved earlier with filgrastim than with lenograstim ((13.2?±?8.0 vs 19.0?±?10.0 days, p?=?0.004), (16.9?±?9.7 vs 29.9?±?16.6 days, p?=?0.001), respectively). The platelet recovery above 20 x 10⁹/l was also achieved earlier with filgrastim than with lenograstim (19.5?±?11.6 vs

27.2?±?13.8 days, p?=?0.006). Furthermore, filgrastim-treated patients received fewer days of granulocyte colony simulating factor (G-CSF) administration (12.5?±?7.0 vs 18.6?±?8.5 days, p?=?0.001) and spent less time in hospital (23.7?±?10.9 vs 32.0?±?17.6 days, p?=?0.009). Duration of antibiotic administration was also significantly shorter in the filgrastim group (13.6?±?7.6 vs 29.1?±?19.8 days, p?=?0.001). Conclusion: In patients undergoing PBSCT following high-dose chemotherapy, filgrastim significantly reduced the duration of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and days of G-CSF administration, and led to earlier hospital discharge compared with lenograstim.     

Economic analysis of lenograstim in the correction of neutropenia following chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

A prospective economic analysis of lenograstim and placebo was performed as part of a randomised double-blind trial in 162 patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The primary clinical end-point was the percentage of patients experiencing > or = 1 documented infection in each treatment group. The cost of hospitalisation and the cost of medical services used were the primary economic end-points. Economic analysis was based on the French Hospital perspective. Over the 56-day study period, patients in the placebo group received more days of inpatient intravenous (8.9 vs 5.3 days; p < 0.01) and oral (5.3 vs 4.2 days) antibiotic therapy than those in the lenograstim group. This difference was due to a higher rate of documented infection in the placebo group. Patients treated with placebo also spent more days in hospital for reasons other than administration of chemotherapy (18.5 vs 14.4; p < 0.05). The number of days of chemotherapy was significantly greater in the lenograstim group than in the placebo group (19.4 vs 17.5; p < 0.001) because of shorter delays between chemotherapy cycles in the lenograstim group. The use of lenograstim to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with NHL was associated with a reduction in total direct medical costs (excluding the cost of lenograstim) of FF7297 as a result of reduced patient morbidity. Furthermore, the higher rate of completion of chemotherapy in the lenograstim group may lead to better long term survival; this observation deserves further clinical investigation.     

Toxicology and pharmacokinetics of DTGM, a fusion toxin consisting of a truncated diphtheria toxin (DT388) linked to human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, in cynomolgus monkeys.

We developed a fusion toxin consisting of the catalytic and translocation domains of diphtheria toxin linked to human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (DTGM) for the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Our goal in this study was to determine the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of DTGM in cynomolgus monkeys (Macacca fascicularis), which possess cross-reactive GM-CSF receptors. Four groups of young adult monkeys (6 males and 12 females) were treated with five daily bolus iv infusions of 1, 5, 7.5, and 10 microgram/kg DTGM. Monkeys (2 males and 2 females) treated at 1 microgram/kg/day showed no significant side effects. Monkeys (2 males and 2 females) treated at 5 microgram/kg/day showed Grade 1-2 thrombopenia (NCI common toxicity criteria) on day 9. In contrast, monkeys (6 females) treated at 7.5 microgram/kg/day developed Grade 3 neutropenia, Grade 1-2 thrombopenia, Grade 1-3 anemia, and Grade 1-3 hypoalbuminemia. The neutropenia developed by day 4 in the 7.5 microgram/kg/day monkeys and by day 3 or 5 in the 10 microgram/kg/day monkeys and resolved in both groups by day 9, but the thrombopenia, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia persisted until day 16. Monkeys (2 male and 2 female) treated with 10 microgram/kg/day showed Grade 4 neutropenia that resolved by day 8 and Grade 2-3 anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and thrombopenia. Three of the animals developed sepsis. DTGM plasma half-life was 30 min with a peak concentration of 0.1 microgram/mL or 2 nM (1000-fold higher than the IC50 in vitro for AML blasts). Immune responses were minimal in all animals tested at 14 and 28 days with anti-DTGM levels <1 microgram/mL. All four animals at 10 microgram/kg died or were euthanized, and necropsies were performed. Animals necropsied on days 4 and 6 showed marked apoptosis and hypoplasia in the marrow, which was completely resolved for animals necropsied on day 9. No injury to other organs, including kidney, heart, liver, central nervous system, or lung, was seen. The drug was selectively toxic to malignant or differentiated myeloid cells with little toxicity to myeloid progenitors or other organs. Minimal effects in nontarget tissues make DTGM a promising candidate chemotherapeutic agent.