Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for metastatic breast carcinoma by imprint cytology.

BACKGROUND: The increasing utilization of lymphatic mapping techniques for breast carcinoma has made intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes attractive. Axillary lymph node dissection can be performed during the initial surgery if the sentinel lymph node is positive, potentially avoiding a second operative procedure. At present the optimal technique for rapid sentinel lymph node assessment has not been determined. Both frozen sectioning and intraoperative imprint cytology are used for rapid intraoperative sentinel lymph node evaluation at many institutions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate experience with imprint cytology for intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective review of the intraoperative imprint cytology results of 678 sentinel lymph node mappings for breast carcinoma was performed. Sentinel nodes were evaluated intraoperatively by either bisecting or slicing the sentinel node into 4 mm sections. Imprints were made of each cut surface and stained with H&E and/or Diff-Quik. Permanent sections were evaluated with up to four H&E stained levels and cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. Intraoperative imprint cytology results were compared with final histologic results. Results: The sensitivity of imprint cytology was 53%, specificity was 98%, positive predictive value was 94%, negative predictive value was 82% and accuracy was 84%. The sensitivity for detecting macrometastases (more than 2mm) was significantly better than for detecting micrometastases (相似文献   

Intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: initial experience and lessons learnt in establishing a new practice

AIMS: The initial 18 months experience of performing intraoperative imprint cytology for patients with breast cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy is described for a single institution. The learning process is compared with published results from institutions with many years of experience in order to assess progress in reaching those ideal results, and the methodology used by these institutions is reviewed. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of the intraoperative imprint cytology results from 103 patients with breast cancer (yielding a total of 170 lymph nodes) who underwent imprint cytology of their sentinel lymph node. The intraoperative imprint cytology results were compared with the final histopathological results. Details regarding the primary tumour characteristics and metastatic deposit size were recorded. RESULTS: The sensitivity for imprint cytology was 31.1%, with a specificity of 100% and overall accuracy of 77.8%. The sensitivity for detecting macrometastases (>2 mm diameter) was 61.9% and the sensitivity for micrometastases (<2 mm diameter) and including isolated tumour cells was 4.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in sensitivity in comparison with many studies in the literature are multifactorial, and include technical aspects, such as the methodology used in the final histopathological and intraoperative evaluation of the sentinel lymph nodes, interpretative difficulties, and much lower case numbers. Furthermore, these numbers represent early experience and methods to improve sensitivity and overall accuracy are detailed in this paper.     

Reliability of intraoperative frozen section and imprint cytological investigation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

AIMS: The sentinel lymph node procedure enables selective targeting of the first draining lymph node, where the initial metastases will form. A negative sentinel node (SN) predicts the absence of tumour metastases in the other regional lymph nodes with high accuracy. This means that in the case of a negative SN, regional lymph node dissection is no longer necessary. Besides saving costs, this will prevent many side-effects of lymph node dissection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraoperative cytological and frozen section investigation of the SN to detect metastases. This would allow the axillary lymph node dissection to be performed in the same session as the SN procedure and the excision of the primary tumour in case of a positive SN. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-four SNs were detected by gamma probe detection of nanocolloid and visual localization of Patent Blue accumulations in 54 women with stage T1-2N0M0 invasive breast cancer. The identified SN were immediately investigated by frozen section and imprint cytological investigation. Diagnoses were confirmed on the paraffin material, and in case of negative frozen section and paraffin haematoxylin and eosin sections, skip sections and immunohistochemistry were performed. Thirty-one SNs (42%) contained metastases, of which 27 were detected by the frozen section procedure (sensitivity 87%). There were no false positives (specificity 100%). The sensitivity of the imprints was 62% with a specificity of 100%. When evaluating the data per patient, for the frozen section procedure the sensitivity was 91% and the specificity 100%, and for the imprints, the sensitivity was 63% and the specificity 100%. There were no SNs in which the imprints showed metastases and the frozen section did not. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative frozen section analysis is a reliable procedure by which a high percentage of sentinel lymph node metastases can be detected in breast cancer patients without false positive results. This allows the surgeon to perform an immediate axillary lymph node dissection in case of positive SNs. In up to 10% of cases, the final paraffin sections will reveal micrometastases that were not detected by the frozen section, and in these patients axillary lymph node dissection will have to be performed in a second session. The imprint method is significantly less sensitive than the frozen section but may be used as an alternative when frozen section is not possible.     

Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma: current methodologies

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an important new addition to the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma. Sentinel nodes have a higher chance of containing metastases than do nonsentinel nodes. Sentinel lymph node biopsy provides an opportunity to stage breast carcinoma patients more accurately and to modify subsequent treatment. One of the most exciting current roles of sentinel lymph node biopsy is the ability to stage patients intraoperatively, allowing a one-step axillary lymph node dissection if the sentinel lymph node contains metastatic carcinoma. Currently, intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes is performed using imprint cytology with or without rapid cytokeratin staining, frozen sectioning with or without rapid cytokeratin staining, scrape preparations, or some combination of these techniques. We review the relative strengths and weaknesses of these different methodologies. A great deal of controversy exists regarding the management of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma, particularly those patients with occult and micrometastatic disease. These issues are beyond the scope of this article.     

Intraoperative cytologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast carcinoma by scrape preparation

Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast carcinoma allows surgeons to complete axillary lymph node dissection in one procedure if any SLN shows metastasis. The accuracy of intraoperative pathological diagnosis is critical for decision-making. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our rapid intraoperative cytologic diagnosis of SLN through comparing with the final surgical pathologic diagnosis of the corresponding lymph nodes. A total of 454 SLNs from 159 consecutive female patients with a preoperative diagnosis of breast carcinoma over 3-year period were included in this study. After gross examination of each bisected lymph node, a scrape preparation was prepared for each submitted lymph node and was stained by the rapid Papanicolaou method. The intraoperative cytologic diagnosis was compared with the final surgical pathologic diagnoses. The overall sensitivity of intraoperative cytology was 52.5% with specificity of 100%. There were 17 false-negative cases. Of them, six nodes had isolated tumor cells, seven nodes had micrometastasis (0.2-2 mm), and four nodes had macrometastasis (>2 mm). There were no interpretive errors identified. The size of metastasis and tumor grade appeared to be significant factors in detecting metastasis by cytology. In addition, subsequent non-SLN involvement was 9% in patients with micrometastasis versus 50% in patients with macrometastasis (P < 0.05). Our study shows that the intraoperative cytologic evaluation of SLNs in breast carcinoma is a reasonably accurate method. The majority of false-negative cases were due to micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells.     

Assessment of sentinel lymph nodes for breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is standard of care for assessment of lymph node stage in early breast cancer in patients with clinically negative nodes. The limited clinical significance of low volume axillary metastatic disease has led to changes in surgical management of the axilla with a shift away from routine axillary lymph node dissection if the sentinel lymph node is found to contain metastatic tumour. This has led to a decrease in the use of intraoperative assessment of sentinel nodes. Specimen handling and histological assessment of sentinel lymph nodes is described, with the emphasis on identification of macrometastatic disease defined as metastases greater than 2 mm. Routine levels and/or cytokeratin immunohistochemistry is not recommended. The increasing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and growing evidence that sentinel lymph node biopsy is safe and accurate in this setting, including in patients with proven node positive disease, has resulted in new challenges in the interpretation of these specimens.     

The value of cytokeratin immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph nodes in patients with lobular breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC) reveals a higher rate of occult lymph node metastases among lobular carcinomas than among ductal breast cancers. IHC is widely used but is seldom recommended for the evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Objective: To assess the value of cytokeratin IHC for the detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. METHODS: The value of IHC, the types of metastasis found by this method, and the involvement of non-sentinel lymph nodes were analysed in a multi-institutional cohort of 449 patients with lobular breast carcinoma, staged by sentinel lymph node biopsy and routine assessment of the sentinel lymph nodes by IHC when multilevel haematoxylin and eosin staining revealed no metastasis. RESULTS: 189 patients (42%) had some type of sentinel node involvement, the frequency of this increasing with increasing tumour size. IHC was needed for identification of 65 of these cases: 17 of 19 isolated tumour cells, 40 of 64 micrometastases, and 8 of 106 larger metastases were detected by this means. Non-sentinel-node involvement was noted in 66 of 161 cases undergoing axillary dissection. Although isolated tumour cells were not associated with further lymph node involvement, sentinel node positivity detected by IHC was associated with further nodal metastases in 12 of 50 cases (0.24), a proportion that is higher than previously reported for breast cancer in general. CONCLUSIONS: IHC is recommended for the evaluation of sentinel nodes from patients with lobular breast carcinoma, as the micrometastases or larger metastases demonstrated by this method are often associated with a further metastatic nodal load.     

Concentrated smear technique for examining sentinel lymph nodes of the breast at the time of frozen section

Examination of sentinel lymph nodes for breast carcinoma in the frozen section room at the time of surgery is useful and, if positive, can result in completion axillary dissection at that time. To avoid wasting tissue, many pathologists use direct smears to examine these specimens. We sought to determine whether a concentrated smear technique that was subjectively easier to screen was as sensitive as standard direct and imprint smears. Eighty-five histologically positive lymph nodes were examined in the frozen section room by intraoperative cytology during the study period (35 using routine direct or imprint smears and 50 with a concentrated technique in which cells are spread in an area of < or = 1 cm(2)); 44 (52%) were identified as positive. Positive cytologic results correlated strongly with the size of the metastatic focus (P < .0001). The sampling sensitivity of the concentrated technique was 60% vs 39% for routine direct or imprint smears (P = .08). There were 3 screening errors in the routine smears and none in the concentrated smears (P = .08). The concentrated technique is as sensitive as routine direct smears for sampling sentinel nodes for breast carcinoma and may be associated with a lower screening error rate.     

Evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy by immunohistochemistry and multilevel sectioning in patients with breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection for evaluation of the presence or absence of metastatic disease is the single most important prognostic factor for patients with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer. Recently, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is being investigated as an alternative to the evaluation of the entire axilla. We evaluated whether the application of multilevel sectioning and immunohistochemistry in SLNs will increase the accuracy of detection of metastatic deposits. METHODS: Between October 1998 and July 1999, 38 patients with breast carcinoma (25 ductal, 5 lobular, 4 tubular, and 4 mixed ductal and lobular) underwent successful SLN biopsy followed by complete axillary node dissection. Sentinel lymph nodes were localized with a combination of isosulfan blue dye and radionuclide colloid injection. Frozen sections and permanent sections of SLNs were examined. All negative SLNs were examined for micrometastases by 3 additional hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained sections and immunohistochemistry with the cytokeratins AE1/AE3. RESULTS: Sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified surgically in 38 (93%) of 41 patients. There was a 97% correlation between the results of the frozen sections and the permanent H&E-stained sections. Twelve (32%) of 38 patients showed evidence of metastatic disease in their SLN by routine H&E staining. In 7 (58%) of 12 patients with positive nodes, the sentinel node was the only positive node. The 26 patients with negative SLN examination by H&E were further analyzed for micrometastases; 5 (19%) were found to have metastatic deposits by immunohistochemistry. Of these patients, 2 were also converted to node positive by detection of micrometastatic disease by examination of the additional H&E levels. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph nodes can be accurately identified in the axilla of breast cancer patients. Evaluation of SLNs provides reliable information representative of the status of the axilla in these patients. Immunohistochemistry and, to a lesser degree, detailed multilevel sectioning are able to further improve our ability to detect micrometastatic disease in SLNs of breast cancer patients.     

Intra-operative examination of the sentinel node in breast cancer

Intra-operative sentinel node analysis allows immediate progression to axillary clearance in patients with node positive breast cancer and reduces the need for re-operation. Despite this, intra-operative sentinel node analysis is infrequently performed in Ireland. We report our experience using this technique. Sentinel node biopsy was performed in 47 consecutive patients with symptomatic T1-T2 clinically node negative breast cancer. Sentinel nodes were examined intra-operatively by frozen section and imprint cytology and definitive histological assessment was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue. The sentinel node was identified in 46 (98%) patients. Twelve patients had axillary metastases. The sensitivity of intra-operative analysis in identifying nodal metastases was 92%. False negative rate was 8%, negative predictive value 97%, and specificity 100%. Intra-operative analysis of the sentinel node allowed re-operation to be avoided in 92% of patients with axillary node metastases. In our experience this technique can be readily introduced with reliable outcomes.     

The extent of agreement between frozen and paraffin block data from axillary samples in patients with early-stage breast cancer

IntroductionPatients with early-stage breast cancer currently undergo sentinel lymph node dissection to evaluate the axillary region. Frozen tissue blocks are evaluated intra operatively and paraffin-embedded samples are studied postoperatively. We explored whether sentinel lymph node dissection adequately reflected axillary involvement (as revealed by the paraffin blocks) in patients with early-stage breast cancer; we sought to avoid axillary dissection.MethodsThe agreement/non-agreement rates between the results of axillary ultrasonography and biopsy, sentinel lymph node and axillary dissections, and frozen and paraffin block results, were retrospectively analyzed for 200 patients with early-stage breast cancer. The positive predictive values and accuracies were recorded in those who were positive on both ultrasonography and biopsy. The negative predictive values were calculated for doubly negative cases.ResultsThe frozen and paraffin block results disagreed in 19 (9.5 %) cases and agreed in 181 (90.5 %). The frozen block and dissection results differed in five of 38 patients who underwent axillary dissection (AD) (one patient did not undergo AD); the results were in agreement in 32. Of the 19 block-disagreement cases, 16 were in the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and three in the NAC treatment group. Clinically, the negative predictive values of the frozen and paraffin block data were 80 % in patients lacking axillary involvement.ConclusionParaffin block evaluations only (thus, without frozen block examinations) of early-stage breast cancer lymph nodes seem to be sufficient to guide treatment. Also, a thorough clinical examination (with ultrasonography and axillary biopsy) reduces the dissection rate and the associated functional impairments.     

乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移的预测

目的 :预测非前哨淋巴结 (non SLN)转移 ,以筛选出转移局限于前哨淋巴结 (SLN)的乳腺癌患者。方法 :采用99mTc SC作为示踪剂 ,对 95例乳腺癌患者行前哨淋巴结活检 ,对乳腺癌非前哨淋巴结转移进行单因素和多因素分析。结果 :95例患者中成功发现 91例患者有SLN (95 8% ) ,其中 85例患者SLN能准确反映腋窝淋巴结的病理状况 (93 4% )。临床肿块大小(P =0 0 2 8)、肿瘤分级 (P =0 0 40 )和原发灶cyclinD1蛋白 (P =0 0 17)的表达与non SLN转移显著相关。而Logistic多因素分析证实 ,临床肿块大小、肿瘤分级为独立的预测非前哨淋巴结转移的因子。结论 :可根据临床病理学特征 ,筛选出乳腺癌转移只局限于前哨淋巴结的患者 ,也存在免除腋窝淋巴结清扫的可能性     

Expression of retinoblastoma protein in breast cancer metastases to sentinel nodes: evaluation of its role as a marker for the presence of metastases in non-sentinel axillary nodes, and comparison to p16INK4a.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of retinoblastoma protein (pRb), alone and in combination with p16, as a predictive marker for metastases in non-sentinel nodes in cases where the sentinel node showed metastatic breast carcinoma. Paraffin blocks of lymph nodes from 48 patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were immunostained with a monoclonal antibody to retinoblastoma protein (PharMingen). Results were compared with known prognostic parameters of the primary tumor, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, proliferation index, and p16 (DAKO) expression. Lymph nodes from 38 of the 48 (79%) cases were pRb positive. There was no correlation of pRb staining alone with the primary tumor parameters studied or the proliferative index of the metastatic tumor. In 16 patients with both a sentinel node biopsy and an axillary lymph node dissection, 8 (50%) had metastatic breast carcinoma. The sentinel nodes of three of these eight patients (38%) were pRb negative (positive predictive value of 60% vs. 73% for p16). The remaining eight patients (50%) had no metastases in non-sentinel nodes, even though their sentinel nodes had metastatic breast carcinoma; six of these eight patients (75%) were pRb positive (negative predictive value of 55% vs. 83% for p16). pRb and p16 staining results combined showed that pRb-negative/p16-positive cases were associated with non-sentinel node metastases (positive predictive value of 100%) as well as poor prognostic parameters. Patients with the opposite staining profile (pRb positive and p16 negative) were mostly without non-sentinel node metastases (negative predictive value of 75%). Cases negative for both pRb and p16 were consistently associated with a better prognostic phenotype and absence of additional axillary node metastases. In conclusion, the presence or absence of pRb in sentinel nodes is of little predictive value for non-sentinel node metastases unless taken in conjunction with the presence of p16 staining. Instead, it appears to enhance the positive predictive value of p16 in determining the presence of non-sentinel node metastases. Due to the limited subgroup sample size in this study, clinical guidelines cannot be suggested as yet, but further research focused on the pRb-negative/p16-positivie and pRb-negative/p16-negative phenotypes may yield beneficial results.     

Assessing second echelon lymph nodes during sentinel lymph node biopsy: can we have more accurate axillary treatment for breast cancer patients?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard treatment for breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla. For patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was required. However, approximately a half of the SLNs-positive patients were found to have clear axillary lymph nodes after ALND, indicating that they had received unnecessary ALND without therapeutic benefit. Therefore, we propose a hypothesis for solution of this clinical problem. We defined the second echelon lymph nodes (SELNs) as those nodes receiving lymphatic drainage directly from the SLNs. For patients with positive-SLNs, SELNs can be biopsy and assessed. If SELNs are negative, no more ALND was needed in these patients even if their SLNs are positive. If our hypothesis were confirmed to be true, we can tailored our axillary treatment to more breast cancer patients, avoiding unnecessary ALND and its complications.     

Evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an accurate method for the detection of axillary metastases in cases of breast carcinoma and is of value as a replacement for axillary dissection. There is variation, however, in the methods and protocols used for the histopathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes, standardisation of which will be required if results of sentinel lymph node analysis are to be used to stratify patients into prognostic groups. The significance of micrometastases, isolated tumour cells (ITCs) and the value of immunohistochemistry are also matters for further definition. In this Expert Opinion we present reviews from two authors, providing American and European perspectives on the approach to sentinel lymph node evaluation.     

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of breast cancer

Axillary nodes status is the best single predictor of disease outcome in patients with breast cancer; presence ofaxillary node metastasis (ANM) reduces the patient's 5-year survival by 28-40%. However, ANM is seen in only 40% of all breast cancer and furthermore since axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is associated with significant morbidity, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) seems to be a good alternative for nodal staging in breast cancer. Pathologically negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) is able to predict the absence of metastasis to the remainder of the regional lymph node basin with a very high degree of certainty. This article presents a systematic detailed review of the existing studies on SLNB in relation to the following parameters: sensitivity and accuracy of the different techniques used; pathologic evaluation of SLN; clinical and pathological factors affecting SLN status and role of SLNB in different clinical situations related to breast cancer management. We have also included brief mention of our experience at UMass from a pathological perspective in this review article.     

Sentinel node micrometastasis in breast carcinoma may not be an indication for complete axillary dissection.

The decision whether to proceed with complete axillary node dissection based on sentinel node status is clear for patients with negative or macrometastatic disease. However, the course of action based on sentinel node micrometastasis remains controversial. We reviewed 358 cases from 6/1999 to 7/2003. All sentinel nodes were evaluated at three levels by frozen section, touch preparation, and scrape preparation. Micrometastasis was defined as tumor deposits between 0.2 and 2 mm. Size, grade, and lymphvascular invasion of the primary tumor, as well as number, status, size of metastatic disease, and presence of extranodal capsular extension of sentinel and nonsentinel nodes were recorded. Of the 358 cases, 89 had positive sentinel nodes, 29 of which represented micrometastases. Only one (3%) of the 29 cases contained a nonsentinel node with macrometastasis. In 60 of the 89 cases sentinel nodes contained macrometastases. Of these, 38 cases (63%) had metastatic tumor in nonsentinel nodes. Intraoperative consult was performed in 53 of the 89 cases with positive sentinel nodes. Only 1 of the 19 (5%) intraoperative consult cases with micrometastatic sentinel nodes had positive nonsentinel nodes, while 21 of 34 (62%) of macrometastatic sentinel nodes at intraoperative consult had tumor in nonsentinel nodes. No single variable studied discriminated between micro- vs macrometastatic disease. At intraoperative consult, macrometastatic disease was present in all three diagnostic preparations, while diagnostic material in micrometastatic sentinel nodes was usually present in only one modality. This analysis suggests that the risk of finding tumor in nonsentinel nodes differs significantly between cases with micro (3%)- vs macro (63%)-metastatic disease in sentinel nodes. This holds true for cases assessed by intraoperative consult. Considering the known morbidity of complete axillary dissection, assessments of risk vs benefit of undertaking this procedure should be performed on a case-by-case basis in patients with sentinel node micrometastases.     

Intraoperative sentinel lymph node evaluation in patients with node-positive breast cancer status post neoadjuvant systemic therapy - An institutional experience

Recent studies have shown the feasibility and utility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with biopsy proven node-positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We reviewed our experience in intraoperative SLN evaluation in such cases and its effect on axillary management. A retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients (2015–2018) with a biopsy-proven positive axillary lymph node, who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy and underwent intraoperative SLN assessment was performed. Intraoperative SLN assessment results were compared with final pathology. Its accuracy and effect on axillary management is summarized. We identified 106 patients with positive axillary lymph node and neoadjuvant systemic therapy between the ages of 28 and 75 years who had SLN biopsy and lumpectomy (33) or mastectomy (73). Three or more SLNs were identified in 91 cases (86 %). The previously biopsied lymph node was identified as one of the sentinel lymph nodes in 93 cases (88 %). There is a high concordance rate between frozen section diagnosis and final diagnosis on sentinel lymph nodes. No false positive case and seven false negative frozen section diagnosis cases (diagnosed as negative on frozen section and positive on permanent sections) were identified. False-negative frozen section diagnosis correlated with low-volume nodal disease and obscuring tumor bed changes. Almost half of the positive lymph nodes were converted to negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SLN biopsy with intraoperative frozen section evaluation after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in node-positive patients is an effective way to minimize axillary surgery.     

保留肋间臂神经对乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结清扫术的感觉障碍影响的研究

目的 探讨乳腺癌手术腋窝淋巴结清扫时保留肋间臂神经(ICBN)对感觉障碍影响的研究.方法 对146例Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲa期乳腺癌患者行改良根治术的临床资料进行分析.将其随机分为两组:保留组(67例)行腋窝淋巴结清扫术时保留ICBN,对照组(79例)行腋窝清扫时常规切除ICBN.比较两组在手术时间、腋窝淋巴结清扫数量及术后上臂内侧感觉异常等情况.结果 保留组及对照组术后1、3、6个月患侧上臂内侧感觉障碍发生率分别为17.9％、74.9％,11.9％、60.7％,7.4％、59.5％,差异均有统计学意义(x2=46.78,P＜0.001;x2=36.54,P＜0.001;x2=42.80,P＜0.001).手术时间及腋窝淋巴结清扫数量差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).术后8个月到5年期间随访无局部复发.结论 对Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲa期乳腺癌患者在行腋窝淋巴结清扫时保留ICBN可明显减少术后患侧上臂内侧感觉障碍,从而提高生活质量,不影响局部复发率.     

Paracortical axillary sentinel lymph node ectopic breast tissue

Benign glandular inclusions in axillary lymph nodes are uncommon, and their presence in axillary sentinel lymph nodes is exceptionally rare. The possibility of over-staging due to misinterpretation of glandular inclusions as metastatic carcinoma is a concerning issue. We present a 54-year-old female with high grade ductal carcinoma in-situ undergoing simple mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Permanent sections of the sentinel lymph node revealed scarce naked small glands without surrounding stroma scattered in the paracortex in the superficial level. Deeper levels showed glands spanning a much larger area (2 mm), with bland ducts and tubules separated by abundant stroma. The myoepithelial layer was visible and was immunohistochemically confirmed. A final diagnosis of benign ectopic breast tissue within an axillary sentinel lymph node was rendered. Previous studies described axillary sentinel lymph nodes with glandular inclusions separated by stroma or subcapsular in location. It has been suggested that paracortical location and absence of stroma are characteristics of metastasis. As demonstrated in our report, benign inclusions may be paracortical and lack surrounding stroma. We recommend that glandular inclusions should be a diagnostic consideration for cases in which paracortically located naked glands do not histologically resemble the corresponding primary tumor.