Onset of epidural blockade after plain or alkalinized 0.5% bupivacaine.

This double-blind study investigated the effect of adding 1.4% bicarbonate to 0.5% bupivacaine on onset time of sensory and motor blockade after epidural administration. Forty patients were randomly divided into one of two groups. Group 1 received 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (pH, 5.58 +/- 0.12) and group 2 received 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 0.6 mL of 1.4% bicarbonate (pH, 6.53 +/- 0.06). Onset of temperature sensation loss occurred at L-1 after 5 min in both groups. The first signs of motor impairment were seen after 4 min in three patients in group 1 and two patients in group 2. Maximum motor blockade was reached after 30 min in group 1 and after 36 min in group 2. No difference in motor blockade or upward spread of anesthesia was noted between the two groups. The authors conclude that alkalinization of 0.5% bupivacaine offers no improvement in the onset of epidural blockade.     

Lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block for knee arthroplasty: comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine

PURPOSE: Information about the onset time and duration of action of ropivacaine during a combined lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block is not available. This study compares bupivacaine and ropivacaine to determine the optimal long-acting local anaesthetic for lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Forty adult patients scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty, under lumbar plexus and sciatic block were entered into this double-blind randomized study. Patients were assigned (20 per group) to receive lumbar plexus block using 30 ml of local anaesthetic and a sciatic nerve block using 15 ml of local anaesthetic with either bupivacaine 0.5% or ropivacaine 0.5%. All solutions contained fresh epinephrine in a 1:400,000 concentration. Every one minute after local anaesthetic injection, patients were assessed to determine loss of motor function and loss of pinprick sensation in the L1-S1 dermatomes. The time to request first analgesic was documented from the PCA pump. This time was used as evidence of block regression. RESULTS: Blocks failed in four patients in each group. The mean onset time of both motor and sensory blockade was between 14 and 18 min in both groups. Duration of sensory blockade was longer in the bupivacaine group, 17 +/- 3 hr, than in the ropivacaine group, 13 +/- 2 hr (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We conclude that bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.5% have a similar onset of motor and sensory blockade when used for lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block. Analgesic duration from bupivacaine 0.5% was prolonged by four hours compared with an equal volume of ropivacaine 0.5%.     

A comparative study of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for brachial plexus block.

The present study compares the effectiveness of 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine in 44 patients receiving a subclavian perivascular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery. The patients were assigned to two equal groups in this randomized, double-blind study; one group received ropivacaine 0.25% (112.5 mg) and the other, bupivacaine 0.25% (112.5 mg), both without epinephrine. Onset times for analgesia and anesthesia in each of the C-5 through T-1 brachial plexus dermatomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. The mean onset time for analgesia ranged from 11.2 to 20.2 min, and the mean onset time for anesthesia ranged from 23.3 to 48.2 min. The onset of motor block differed only with respect to paresis in the hand, with bupivacaine demonstrating a shorter onset time than ropivacaine. The duration of sensory and motor block also was not significantly different between the two groups. The mean duration of analgesia ranged from 9.2 to 13.0 h, and the mean duration of anesthesia ranged from 5.0 to 10.2 h. Both groups required supplementation with peripheral nerve blocks or general anesthesia in a large number of cases, with 9 of the 22 patients in the bupivacaine group and 8 of the 22 patients in the ropivacaine group requiring supplementation to allow surgery to begin. In view of the frequent need for supplementation noted with both 0.25% ropivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine, we do not recommend using the 0.25% concentrations of these local anesthetics to provide brachial plexus block.     

Clonidine as adjuvant for mepivacaine, ropivacaine and bupivacaine in axillary, perivascular brachial plexus block

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of clonidine on three local anesthetics (mepivacaine 1%, ropivacaine 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.5%) with comparable potency and almost the same concentration-response relationship. METHODS: One hundred and twenty trauma-patients were randomly allocated into six groups. In the control-groups (Mo/Ro/Bo) brachial plexus was performed using 40 mL of local anesthetic plus 1 mL of NaCL 0.9%. In the clonidine-groups (Mc/Rc/Bc) brachial plexus was performed using each 40 mL of drug plus 1 mL (0.150 mg) of clonidine. Onset-time and the duration of the sensory block were recorded. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD. RESULTS: According to the average sensory block determined by a visual analog scale in the median, ulnar and radial nerve distributions and ranging from 100 (no sensory blockade) to 0 (complete sensory blockade), both mepi-groups showed a rapid onset (at 10 min: -Mo 20 +/- 15/Mc 19 +/- 14; at 30 min: -Mo 3 +/- 4/Mc 5 +/- 4). The ropi-and bupi- groups both had a longer onset time (at 10 min: -Ro 23 +/- 19/Rc 25 +/- 22/Bo 24 +/- 15; at 30 min -Ro 10 +/- 6/ Rc 11 +/- 6 /Bo 12 +/- 4). The onset time in group-Bc was significantly prolonged (at 10 min: -45 +/- 21; at 30 min: -20 +/- 6). Duration of motor blockade was prolonged by clonidine only in the mepivacaine and bupivacaine groups; (in minutes: Mo 212 +/- 47 -Mc 468 +/- 62; Ro 702 +/- 52 -Rc 712 +/- 82; Bo 728 +/- 36 -Bc 972 +/- 72). CONCLUSION: The present study shows that the addition of clonidine has a different impact on each of the three local anesthetics investigated in terms of onset and duration of block.     

The effects of clonidine on ropivacaine 0.75% in axillary perivascular brachial plexus block

INTRODUCTION: The new long-acting local anesthetic ropivacaine is a chemical congener of bupivacaine and mepivacaine. The admixture of clonidine to local anesthetics in peripheral nerve block has been reported to result in a prolonged block. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of clonidine added to ropivacaine on onset, duration and quality of brachial plexus block. METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In group I brachial plexus was performed using 40 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 1 ml of NaCL 0.9%, and in group II brachial plexus was performed using 40 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% plus 1 ml (0.150 mg) of clonidine. Onset of sensory and motor block of radial, ulnar, median and musculocutaneous nerve were recorded. Motor block was evaluated by quantification of muscle force, according to a rating scale from 6 (normal contraction force) to 0 (complete paralysis). Sensory block was evaluated by testing response to a pinprick in the associated innervation areas. Finally, the duration of the sensory block was registered. Data were expressed in mean+/-SD. For statistical analysis a Student t-test was used. A P-value of < or = 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The duration of blockade was without significant difference between the groups. Group I: 718+/-90 min; Group II: 727+/-117 min. There was no intergroup difference in sensory and motor onset or in quality of blockade. CONCLUSION: The addition of clonidine to ropivacaine 0.75% does not lead to any advantage of block of the brachial plexus when compared with pure ropivacaine 0.75%.     

A multicentre trial of ropivacaine 7.5 mg·ml−1 vs bupivacaine 5 mg·ml−1 for supra clavicular brachial plexus anesthesia

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine 7.5 mg x ml(-1) with bupivacaine 5.0 mg x ml(-1) for subclavian perivascular brachial plexus block. METHODS: After informed consent, 104 ASA I-III adults participated in a randomized, double-blind, multi-center trial to receive 30 ml of either ropivacaine 7.5 mg x ml(-1) or bupivacaine 5.0 mg x ml(-1) for subclavian perivascular brachial plexus block prior to upper limb surgery. Onset and duration of sensory and motor block in the distribution of the axillary, median, musculo-cutaneous, radial and ulnar nerves were assessed. RESULTS: Onset times and duration of sensory and motor block were similar between groups. Mean duration of analgesia for the five nerves was between 11.3 and 14.3 hr with ropivacaine and between 10.3 and 17.1 hr with bupivacaine. Quality of muscle relaxation judged as excellent by the investigators was not significantly different (ropivacaine - 35/49, bupivacaine - 30/49). The median time to first request for analgesia was comparable between the two groups (11-12 hr). One patient developed a grand mal seizure shortly after receiving bupivacaine and recovered consciousness within 30 min. There were no serious adverse events in the ropivacaine group. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty ml ropivacaine 7.5 mg x ml(-1) (225 mg) produced effective and well tolerated brachial plexus block of long duration by the subclavian perivascular route. In this study, the results were similar to those of 30 ml bupivacaine 5.0 mg x ml(-1).     

Brachial plexus block with midazolam and bupivacaine improves analgesia

PURPOSE: Adjuncts to local anesthetics for brachial plexus block may enhance the quality and duration of analgesia. Midazolam, a water-soluble benzodiazepine, is known to produce antinociception and enhance the effect of local anesthetics when given epidurally or intrathecally. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of midazolam added to brachial plexus anesthesia. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double blind study was conducted on 40 ASA I or II adult patients undergoing upper limb surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in Group B (n = 20) were administered 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine and Group BM (n = 20) were given 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with midazolam 50 microg x kg(-1). Hemodynamic variables (i.e., heart rate, noninvasive blood pressure), pain scores and rescue analgesic requirements were recorded for 24 hr postoperatively. RESULTS: The onset of sensory and motor block was significantly faster in Group BM compared to Group B (P < 0.05). Pain scores were significantly higher in Group B compared to Group BM from two hours to 24 hr postoperatively (P < 0.05). Rescue analgesic requirements were significantly less in Group BM compared to Group B (P < 0.05). Hemodynamics and sedation scores did not differ between groups in the post-operative period. CONCLUSION: Midazolam (50 microg x kg(-1)) in combination with 30 mL of bupivacaine (0.5%) hastened onset of sensory and motor block, and improved postoperative analgesia when used in brachial plexus block, without producing any adverse events.     

Hyperbaric spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: a comparison to hyperbaric bupivacaine.

We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine compared with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for elective cesarean delivery. Sixty healthy, full-term parturients were randomly assigned to receive either 12 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine or 18 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine intrathecally. There were no significant differences in demographic or surgical variables or neonatal outcomes between groups. Onset time of sensory block to T10 or to peak level was later in the Ropivacaine group (P < 0.05). The median (range) peak level of analgesia was T3 (T1-5) in the Bupivacaine group and T3 (T1-4) in the Ropivacaine group. Time for sensory block to recede to T10 did not differ between groups. Duration of sensory block was shorter in the Ropivacaine group (188.5 +/- 28.2 min vs 162.5 +/- 20.2 min; P < 0.05). Complete motor block of the lower extremities was obtained in all patients. Ropivacaine also produced a shorter duration of motor blockade than bupivacaine (113.7 +/- 18.6 min vs 158.7 +/- 31.2 min; P < 0.000). The intraoperative quality of anesthesia was excellent and similar in both groups. Side effects did not differ between groups. Eighteen milligrams of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine provided effective spinal anesthesia with shorter duration of sensory and motor block, compared with 12 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine when administered for cesarean delivery Implications: Eighteen milligrams of 0.5% hyperbaric ropivacaine provided effective spinal anesthesia with shorter duration of sensory and motor block, compared with 12mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine when administered for cesarean delivery.     

A comparison of ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% for brachial plexus block

This study compared the effectiveness of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for brachial plexus block. Forty-eight patients received a subclavian perivascular brachial plexus block for upper-extremity surgery. One group (n = 24) received ropivacaine 0.5% (175 mg) and a second group (n = 24) received bupivacaine 0.5% (175 mg), both without epinephrine. Onset times for analgesia and anesthesia in each of the C5 through T1 brachial plexus dermatomes did not differ significantly between groups. Duration of analgesia and anesthesia was long (mean duration of analgesia, 13-14 h; mean duration of anesthesia, 9-11 h) and also did not differ significantly between groups. Motor block was profound, with shoulder paralysis as well as hand paresis developing in all of the patients in both groups. Two patients in each group required supplemental blocks before surgery. Ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% appeared equally effective in providing brachial plexus anesthesia.     

Dexamethasone added to lidocaine prolongs axillary brachial plexus blockade

Different additives have been used to prolong regional blockade. We designed a prospective, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone added to lidocaine on the onset and duration of axillary brachial plexus block. Sixty patients scheduled for elective hand and forearm surgery under axillary brachial plexus block were randomly allocated to receive either 34 mL lidocaine 1.5% with 2 mL of isotonic saline chloride (control group, n = 30) or 34 mL lidocaine 1.5% with 2 mL of dexamethasone (8 mg) (dexamethasone group, n = 30). Neither epinephrine nor bicarbonate was added to the treatment mixture. We used a nerve stimulator and multiple stimulations technique in all of the patients. After performance of the block, sensory and motor blockade of radial, median, musculocutaneous, and ulnar nerves were recorded at 5, 15, and 30 min. The onset time of the sensory and motor blockade was defined as the time between last injection and the total abolition of the pinprick response and complete paralysis. The duration of sensory and motor blocks were considered as the time interval between the administration of the local anesthetic and the first postoperative pain and complete recovery of motor functions. Sixteen patients were excluded because of unsuccessful blockade. The duration of surgery and the onset times of sensory and motor block were similar in the two groups. The duration of sensory (242 +/- 76 versus 98 +/- 33 min) and motor (310 +/- 81 versus 130 +/- 31 min) blockade were significantly longer in the dexamethasone than in the control group (P < 0.01). We conclude that the addition of dexamethasone to lidocaine 1.5% solution in axillary brachial plexus block prolongs the duration of sensory and motor blockade.     

Hyperbaric subarachnoid ropivacaine in ambulatory surgery: comparative study with hyperbaric bupivacaine

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical efficacy of hyperbaric 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in subarachnoid blockade for ambulatory surgery. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Randomized double-blind study of 90 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Subarachnoid blockade was achieved with 0.5% ropivacaine (12.5 mg) or 0.5% bupivacaine (12.5 mg) in 10% glucose. We recorded age, sex, weight, latency, extension of motor and sensory blocks, duration of surgery, side effects and quality as perceived by the surgeon and the patient. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to latency time and extension of sensory block. Durations of motor (68.9 +/- 22.9 min) and sensory (127.0 +/- 24.3 min) blocks were significantly shorter with ropivacaine than with bupivacaine (133.3 +/- 29.4 and 174.9 +/- 25.5 min, respectively). Patients in the ropivacaine group also experienced a less intense motor block (Bromage 1, 11.1% vs. 93.3%) and fewer episodes of hypotension 0% vs. 17.7%) or bradycardia (4.4% vs. 8.8%) than those in the bupivacaine group. No neurotoxic effects or instances of postdural puncture headache were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperbaric 0.5% ropivacaine offers certain advantages over hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine for subarachnoid block in outpatient surgery. Duration and intensity of the sensory-motor blockade is less with ropivacaine and fewer cardiovascular side effects develop.     

Effect of dexamethasone on motor brachial plexus block with bupivacaine and with bupivacaine-loaded microspheres in a sheep model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that dexamethasone potentiates the sensory block produced by bupivacaine when both drugs are loaded in microspheres. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone on the brachial plexus block obtained with plain bupivacaine and bupivacaine-loaded microspheres. METHODS: Dexamethasone alone (Group 5) or added to plain bupivacaine (75 mg) with (Groups 3 and 4) and without pH correction (Group 2) was compared with plain bupivacaine (75 mg; Group 1). The effect of a small dose of dexamethasone (0.42 mg) was then evaluated on the brachial plexus block obtained with bupivacaine (750 mg) as bupivacaine-loaded microspheres (Group 6). Dexamethasone was added either in the suspending medium (Group 7) or incorporated with bupivacaine into microspheres (Group 8). The motor block was evaluated in a plexus brachial sheep model. RESULTS: Dexamethasone alone did not produce any motor block. When added to plain bupivacaine without pH correction, complete motor block could not be obtained. When the pH was corrected, addition of dexamethasone to plain bupivacaine seemed to delay the onset of motor block and did not prolong its duration, and it had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine. With bupivacaine-loaded microspheres, the duration of complete motor block was reduced when a small dose of dexamethasone was added in the suspending medium. However, the duration of motor block was significantly prolonged when dexamethasone was incorporated with bupivacaine into microspheres. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the delayed onset of motor block, the incorporation of dexamethasone in bupivacaine-loaded microspheres dramatically increases the duration of action (700 +/- 485-5160 +/- 2136 min), which could be clinically relevant when such a drug-delivery system will be available.     

Fentanyl improves analgesia but prolongs the onset of axillary brachial plexus block by peripheral mechanism

We evaluated the effects of fentanyl added to lidocaine for axillary brachial plexus block in 66 adult patients scheduled for elective hand and forearm surgery. In this double-blinded study, all patients received 40 mL of 1.5% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, injected into the brachial plexus sheath using the axillary perivascular technique, and they were randomized into three groups. Group 1 was given lidocaine containing 2 mL of normal saline plus 2 mL of normal saline IV. Patients in Group 2 received lidocaine containing 100 microg fentanyl plus 2 mL of normal saline IV. Group 3 patients received lidocaine containing 2 mL of normal saline plus 100 microg fentanyl IV. Sensory and motor blockade were evaluated by using a pinprick technique and by measuring the gripping force, respectively. The success rate of sensory blockade for radial and musculocutaneous nerves and the duration of the sensory blockade significantly increased in Group 2 (323 +/- 96 min) as compared with Group 1 (250 +/- 79 min). However, onset time of analgesia was prolonged in every nerve distribution by adding fentanyl to brachial plexus block. IV fentanyl had no effect on the success rate, onset, or duration of blockade. We conclude that the addition of fentanyl to lidocaine causes an improved success rate of sensory blockade but a delayed onset of analgesia, although this may be accounted for by the decreased pH caused by the fentanyl. Implications: It is still unclear whether the addition of a peripheral opioid is useful for nerve blockade in humans. Peripheral application of fentanyl to lidocaine for axillary brachial plexus blockade in this study provided an improved success rate of sensory blockade and prolonged duration.     

Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia.

Levobupivacaine is the pure S(-)-enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine but is less toxic to the heart and central nervous system. Although it has recently been introduced for routine obstetric and nonobstetric epidural anesthesia, comparative clinical studies on its intrathecal administration are not available. We therefore performed this prospective randomized double-blinded study to evaluate the anesthetic potencies and hemodynamics of intrathecal levobupivacaine compared with racemic bupivacaine. Eighty patients undergoing elective hip replacement received either 3.5 mL levobupivacaine 0.5% isobaric or 3.5 mL bupivacaine 0.5% isobaric. Sensory blockade was verified with the pinprick test; motor blockade was documented by using a modified Bromage score. Hemodynamic variables (e.g., blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry) were also recorded. Intergroup differences between levobupivacaine and bupivacaine were insignificant both with regard to the onset time and the duration of sensory and motor blockade (11 +/- 6 versus 13 +/- 8 min; 10 +/- 7 versus 9 +/- 7 min; 228 +/- 77 versus 237 +/- 88 min; 280 +/- 84 versus 284 +/- 80 min). Both groups showed slight reductions in heart rate and mean arterial pressure, but there was no intergroup difference in hemodynamics. We conclude that intrathecal levobupivacaine is equal in efficacy to, but less toxic than, racemic bupivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: Levobupivacaine, the pure S(-)-enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine is an equally effective local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia compared with racemic bupivacaine.     

Latency of brachial plexus block The effect on onset time of warming local anaesthetic solutions

A double-blind study was set up to investigate the effect of warming local anaesthetic solutions on the latency of onset of subclavian perivascular brachial plexus blocks. Twenty-four adult patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups. In group A the local anaesthetic was injected at room temperature, while in group B the local anaesthetic solution was prewarmed to 37 degrees C in a thermostatically controlled heating block. All blocks were performed using 0.5 ml/kg of a solution prepared by mixing equal volumes of 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1:200,000, and 1% prilocaine. The speed of onset of sensory blockade was significantly increased when the temperature of the local anaesthetic solution was increased to 37 degrees C. There were no adverse side effects in either group.     

Interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia with either 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine

BACKGROUND: To compare intra- and postoperative clinical properties of interscalene brachial plexus block performed with either 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine. METHODS: Experimental design: prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Setting: in patient at the University Hospital, Department of Orthopedic Surgery. Patients: 30 ASA physical status I-II patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery. Interventions: interscalene brachial plexus block was performed using the multiple injection technique and a nerve stimulator by injecting 20 ml of either 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 15) or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 15). Postoperative analgesia consisted of 100 mg intravenous ketoprofen, if required. A blind observer evaluated hemodynamic variables as well as sensory and motor blocks from the end of injection to achieve a surgical anesthesia (readiness for surgery: loss of pinprick sensation from C4 to C7 with the inability to elevate the operated limb against gravity). The time lasting from block placement to first requirement for postoperative pain medication was also recorded. RESULTS: No differences in anthropometric parameters and hemodynamic variables were observed throughout the study, and no signs of central nervous system (CNS) and cardiovascular toxicity, or other untoward events were reported in any patients. Readiness for surgery was obtained after 28 +/- 15 min with 0.5% bupivacaine and 22 +/- 8 min after 0.5% ropivacaine (p = NS). No differences in postoperative pain relief was observed between the two groups (11.1 +/- 5 hrs after 0.5% ropivacaine and 10.9 +/- 3.9 hrs after 0.5% bupivacaine, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that 0.5% ropivacaine has clinical properties similar to those of 0.5% bupivacaine, when used for interscalene brachial plexus block, providing similarly long duration in postoperative pain relief. Compared with bupivacaine, ropivacaine has the further advantage of a lower potential for central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity.     

Effect of low-dose dexmedetomidine or clonidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine spinal block

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the onset and duration of sensory and motor block, as well as the hemodynamic changes and level of sedation, following intrathecal bupivacaine supplemented with either dexmedetomidine or clonidine. METHODS: In a prospective, double-blind study, 60 patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate or bladder tumor under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of three groups. Group B received 12 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine, group D received 12 mg of bupivacaine supplemented with 3 microg of dexmedetomidine and group C received 12 mg of bupivacaine supplemented with 30 microg of clonidine. The onset times to reach peak sensory and motor levels, and the sensory and motor regression times, were recorded. Hemodynamic changes and the level of sedation were also recorded. RESULTS: Patients in groups D and C had a significantly shorter onset time of motor block and significantly longer sensory and motor regression times than patients in group B. The mean time of sensory regression to the S1 segment was 303 +/- 75 min in group D, 272 +/- 38 min in group C and 190 +/- 48 min in group B (B vs. D and B vs. C, P < 0.001). The regression of motor block to Bromage 0 was 250 +/- 76 min in group D, 216 +/- 35 min in group C and 163 +/- 47 min in group B (B vs. D and B vs. C, P < 0.001). The onset and regression times were not significantly different between groups D and C. The mean arterial pressure, heart rate and level of sedation were similar in the three groups intra-operatively and post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine (3 microg) or clonidine (30 microg), when added to intrathecal bupivacaine, produces a similar prolongation in the duration of the motor and sensory block with preserved hemodynamic stability and lack of sedation.     

A clinical comparison of ropivacaine 0.75%, ropivacaine 1% or bupivacaine 0.5% for interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia

In order to compare interscalene brachial plexus block performed with ropivacaine or bupivacaine, 45 healthy, unpremedicated patients, undergoing elective shoulder surgery, were randomly allocated to receive interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 20 mL of either ropivacaine 0.75% (n = 15), ropivacaine 1% (n = 15), or bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 15). Readiness for surgery (loss of pinprick sensation from C4 to C7 and inability to elevate the limb from the bed) was achieved later with bupivacaine 0.5% (28 +/- 15 min) than with ropivacaine 1% (10 +/- 5 min) (P = 0.005) and ropivacaine 0.75% (15 +/- 8 min) (P = 0.0005). No differences in success rate were observed between the three groups; however, seven patients receiving bupivacaine 0.5% required intra-operative analgesic supplementation (fentanyl 0.1 mg intravenous) compared with one patient receiving ropivacaine 0.75%, and two patients treated with ropivacaine 1% (P = 0.02). The time from the block placement to first request for pain medication was similar in the three groups (10.7 +/- 2 h, 11 +/- 2.4 h, and 10.9 +/- 3.9 h after 0.75% and 1% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine, respectively). We conclude that interscalene brachial plexus block performed with 20 mL of either 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine allows for a prolonged post-operative pain relief, similar to that provided by bupivacaine 0.5%, with short onset time of surgical anaesthesia.     

The influence of baricity on differential blockade with 0.5% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia

We evaluated the influence of baricity on differential blockade during spinal anesthesia using isobaric or hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. Forty ASA-PS I-II patients scheduled for elective surgery (orthopedic, lower abdominal and urologic) were divided into two groups; group H, using hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, and group I, using isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine. Spinal anesthesia was performed in lateral decubitus position, using a 25-gauge Quincke needle at L2-3 interspace, and 0.5% bupivacaine 2.0 ml was injected for 10 seconds. Patients were turned to supine position soon after the spinal anesthesia and the block levels were examined every 5 min for 30 min. Sympathetic blockade was detected by observer's hand, the loss of cold sensation by alcohol sponge and the loss of pain sensation by pinprick. Complete motor blockade was detected by modified Bromage scale. Significant higher sensory blockade and large number of complete motor block were observed in group H. Differential blockade between sympathetic and sensory was significant and lasted 30 min in group I, but lasted only 15 min in group H.     

Reversal of bupivacaine epidural anesthesia by intermittent epidural injections of crystalloid solutions

This study was designed to determine whether epidural motor blockade could be reversed by postoperative injections of crystalloid solutions via the epidural catheter. Twenty-seven patients (ASA physical status I, nonlaboring) had epidural anesthesia with 0.75% bupivacaine for elective cesarean delivery. Postoperatively, patients were randomized to receive three 15-mL injections (over 30 min) of crystalloid solutions (normal saline or Ringer's lactate) or no treatment (control) via the epidural catheter. Degree of motor and sensory blockade was evaluated with an investigator blinded to treatment group. Rate of resolution of sensory blockade was not different among groups. However, time for resolution of motor blockade was more than twice as long in the control group than in either treatment group (control = 178 +/- 70 min vs Ringer's lactate = 84 +/- 44 min, normal saline = 70 +/- 38 min, P = 0.001). The data suggest that unwanted motor blockade due to epidural anesthesia can be reversed by epidural injections of crystalloid solutions.