The intubating laryngeal mask airway after induction of general anesthesia versus awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways

We performed the current study to compare tracheal intubation (TI) using awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) and TI using the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) in patients with difficult airway. Our hypothesis was that patients with difficult airways could be safely intubated after induction of anesthesia using the ILMA. After ethics approval and informed consent, 38 patients who were identified to have difficult airways were randomly assigned to AFOI or TI using the ILMA. Patients in the AFOI group had the usual sedation and airway topicalization. Patients in the ILMA group were induced with propofol for ILMA insertion and succinylcholine for TI. The first TI attempt was done blindly via the ILMA and all subsequent attempts were performed with fiberoptic guidance. All patients in the ILMA group were successfully ventilated. Successful TI was achieved in all patients in both groups. However, in 10% of the patients in the ILMA group, TI was achieved by a second anesthesiologist who was more experienced with the use of the ILMA. In a postoperative questionnaire, patients in the ILMA group were more satisfied with their method of TI (P < 0.01). The ILMA is a useful device in the management of patients with difficult airways and may be a valuable alternative to AFOI when AFOI is contraindicated or in the patient with the unanticipated difficult airway. IMPLICATIONS: The intubating laryngeal mask airway is a useful device in the management of patients with difficult airways and may be a valuable alternative to awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) when AFOI is contraindicated or in the patient with the unanticipated difficult airway.     

Airway management using the intubating laryngeal mask airway for the morbidly obese patient

We studied the effectiveness of the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) in morbidly obese patients scheduled for bariatric surgery. We included 118 consecutive morbidly obese patients (body mass index, 45 +/- 5 kg/m(2)). After the induction of general anesthesia, the laryngeal view was classified by the first observer according to the method of Cormack and Lehane. The ILMA was then inserted, and the trachea was intubated through the ILMA by a second observer. The rate of successful tracheal intubation with ILMA was 96.3%. The success rate, the number of attempts, and the total duration of the procedure were not different among patients with low-grade (Cormack 1-2) and patients with high-grade (Cormack 3-4) laryngeal views. The time required for insertion of the ILMA was slightly longer in patients with high-grade laryngeal views. Failures of the technique were not explained by the experience of the practitioner or airway characteristics. No adverse effect related to the technique was reported. Results of this study suggest that using the ILMA provides an additional technique for airway management of morbidly obese patients. IMPLICATIONS: The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) provides an additional technique for airway management of morbidly obese patients. The best choice of the primary technique (laryngoscopy or ILMA) for tracheal intubation of an adult obese patient remains to be determined.     

A comparison of bullard laryngoscope and intubating laryngeal mask using fiberoptic guidance for tracheal intubation

The purpose of this study is to compare the success rate of tracheal intubation, intubation time and laryngoscopic view of the larynx by Bullard laryngoscope or by intubating laryngeal mask using fiberoptic guidance in 50 patients. Following a standardized induction protocol, conventional laryngoscopic view by Macintosh's laryngoscope was obtained and classified by Cormack's grades. We measured the times from incertion of laryngoscopy or laryngeal mask until obtaining the best view of the larynx and until tracheal intubation. A best view by Bullard laryngoscopy or by fiberoscopy through the laryngeal mask was classified by Cormack's grades. The success rate of tracheal intubation was higher by Bullard laryngoscopy than by intubating laryngeal mask. The durations of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were significantly shorter and Cormack's grades were significantly lower by Bullard laryngoscopy than by laryngeal mask and fiberscopy. These results demonstrate that tracheal intubation by Bullard laryngoscope is faster and more successful compared with intubating laryngeal mask using fiberoptic guidance.     

Using the intubating laryngeal mask airway for ventilation and endotracheal intubation in anesthetized and unparalyzed acromegalic patients

Airway management may be difficult in acromegalic patients. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) as a primary tool for ventilation and intubation in acromegalic patients. Twenty-three consenting consecutive adult acromegalic patients presenting for transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma were enrolled in the study. Anesthesia was induced using propofol (1.5 mg/kg followed by 0.5-mg/kg increments); the ILMA was inserted when the bispectral index fell below 50. The ILMA was successful as a primary airway for oxygenation and ventilation at the first attempt for 21 (91%) patients, while 2 (9%) patients required a second attempt. Patient movement was noticed in five (21.7%) of the patients during ILMA insertion. An attempt at tracheal intubation through the ILMA was performed following administration of a mean 395 +/- 168-mg dose of propofol. Overall success rates for tracheal intubation were 82% (19 patients). The first-attempt success rate for tracheal intubation was 52.6% (10 patients), second- and third-attempt success rates were 42.1% (8 patients) and 5.3% (1 patient), respectively. Coughing or movement during intubation was observed in 12 (63.2%) of the patients. Direct laryngoscopy permitted intubation in three cases and blind intubation using a bougie in the fourth case. ILMA can be used as a primary airway for oxygenation in acromegalic patients (manual bag ventilation), but the rate of failed blind intubation through the ILMA precludes its use as a first choice for elective airway management.     

Comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope vs. the intubating laryngeal mask for females with normal airways

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In this randomized clinical study, we compared the intubation success rates of the intubating laryngeal mask airway with the GlideScope in patients with normal airways. The primary hypothesis was that the intubating laryngeal mask airway was equally effective as the GlideScope in terms of successful intubation times. METHODS: Sixty ASA I and II adult patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgery were randomly allocated into either the intubating laryngeal mask airway group or the GlideScope group. After a standard anaesthetic intravenous induction, orotracheal intubation was performed. Time taken for successful tracheal intubation, ease of device insertion, difficulty of tracheal intubation, manoeuvres needed to aid tracheal intubation, number of intubation attempts, haemodynamic changes every 2.5 min interval for 5 min and complications during tracheal intubation were recorded. RESULTS: Time to successful intubation was longer (mean 68.4 s +/- 23.5 vs. 35.7 s +/- 10.7; P < 0.05), mean difficulty score was higher (mean 16.7 +/- 16.3 vs. 7.3 +/- 13.1; P < 0.05) and more intubation attempts were required in the intubating laryngeal mask airway group. CONCLUSION: The GlideScope improved intubation time and difficulty score for tracheal intubation when compared with the intubating laryngeal mask airway in our patients. Blind intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway offers no advantages over the GlideScope in patients with normal airways. Despite its limitations, the intubating laryngeal mask airway is a valuable adjunct, especially in cases of difficult airway management when it can provide ventilation in between intubation attempts.     

Feasibility of flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We tested the feasibility of using the intubating laryngeal mask airway Fastrach (ILMA) as a ventilatory device and for flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician. METHODS: After completion of a training programme, a single experienced emergency physician used the technique for all patients requiring out-of-hospital tracheal intubation over a 10-month period. If access to the head and neck was limited, the intubating laryngeal mask airway was inserted from below and to the side, otherwise it was inserted from above the head. Data about the time for the ambulance to reach the patient, whether or not access to the head and neck was limited, whether or not circulation was successfully restored, and the insertion and intubation success rates were noted. RESULTS: The mean (range) time for the ambulance to reach the patient was 12 (10-20) min. Access to the head and neck was limited in 8/37 (22%). Circulation was successfully restored in 10/37 (27%). The intubating laryngeal mask airway was successfully inserted at the first attempt in 35/37 (95%) and at the second attempt in 2/37 (5%). The tracheal tube was successfully inserted in 25/37 (67.5%) at the first attempt, 7/37 (19%) at the second attempt and 5/37 (13.5%) at the third attempt. There were no overall failures for intubating laryngeal mask airway insertion or tracheal intubation. There were no differences in success rate between positions. Oesophageal intubation was detected and corrected in 2/37 (5%). CONCLUSION: The intubating laryngeal mask airway has a high success rate as a ventilatory device and as a flexible lightwand-guided airway intubator during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by a well-trained emergency physician. This technique may be particularly useful when there is limited access to the head and neck.     

Removal of the connector on the laryngeal mask airway provides a useful alternative to the intubating laryngeal mask

PURPOSE: We describe two cases in which fiberoptic intubation through the standard laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was successful with large-bore tracheal tubes (TTs) when an intubating LMA (ILMA) could not be used. CLINICAL FEATURES: Patient # 1, with obstructive sleep apnea, underwent elective surgical repair. His mouth opening was just under 25 mm, but difficult intubation was not anticipated. We induced general anesthesia, easily ventilated the patient by mask, and established neuromuscular blockade. Direct laryngoscopy and attempts to insert either a #5 or a #4 ILMA into the mouth failed. A standard #4 LMA, with the connector removed, was inserted, through which a 7.0 mm nasal RAE TT, fiberoptically guided, passed into the trachea at the first attempt. Patient #2, with a loosened implant after left hip arthroplasty, underwent revision prosthesis. Her neck movement was limited. We thus planned awake securing of the airway, but the patient refused. We induced anesthesia and established bag-mask-valve ventilation. The limited neck movement prevented direct laryngoscopy. Visualizing the laryngeal inlet with the fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) proved impossible as bloody secretions obscured the FOB's tip. Ventilation by mask was easy. As an ILMA was not available, we removed a #5 LMAs connector and passed an 8.0 mm nasal RAE TT through the LMA. Fiberoptic-guided intubation was easy. In both cases, the remainder of the intraoperative course was uneventful. CONCLUSION: A standard LMA whose connector has been removed to allow passage of TTs of >6.0 mm internal diameter may be substituted for the ILMA when necessary.     

The cardiovascular response to insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask airway

Sixty-one patients received a standardised anaesthetic and were randomly assigned to three groups: tracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation via an intubating laryngeal mask airway with immediate removal of the device, and tracheal intubation via an intubating laryngeal mask airway with delayed removal. The cardiovascular response to intubation was of a similar magnitude in all groups, although delayed removal of the intubating laryngeal mask airway was associated with a second pressor response. Norepinephrine changed significantly over time following direct laryngoscopy and following immediate removal of the intubating laryngeal mask airway, but not after delayed removal. The findings of this study do not support using the intubating laryngeal mask instead of direct laryngoscopy purely to decrease the response to intubation.     

Intubation in a patient with lingual tonsil hypertrophy using an intubating laryngeal mask airway in combination with fiberoptic intubation

A 66-yr-old man was scheduled for colon resection under general anesthesia. There were no findings suggesting difficulty of airway management. After induction of anesthesia, manual ventilation via a facemask was suboptimal, but increased fresh gas flow improved it. At direct laryngoscopy after achieving muscular relaxation, the arytenoids and epiglottis could not be seen even by an expert anesthesiologist. Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) was inserted to patient's larynx and ventilation could be continued. Tracheal intubation through ILMA was impossible because of hard resistance for inserting the endotracheal tube. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy revealed that the hypertrophied lingual tonsil obstructed the aperture of ILMA. Several attempts were made for intubation using fiberoptic tracheal intubation technique through ILMA and finally the patient's trachea was intubated without any bleeding or swelling of laryngeal tissues. The effectiveness of ILMA for the patient with lingual tonsil hypertrophy is still unknown, but the insertion of ILMA might be considered for safe airway management in combination with a fiberscope.     

Fibreoptic views through the laryngeal mask and the intubating laryngeal mask.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The intubating laryngeal mask (intubating laryngeal mask airway) was designed to facilitate blind intubation. Its value as an adjunct to fibreoptic laryngoscopy has not been evaluated. This study compares the intubating laryngeal mask airway with the standard laryngeal mask airway as conduits for fibreoptic laryngoscopy. METHODS: The fibreoptic view of the laryngeal inlet was graded via both devices in 60 anaesthetized patients. The fibreoptic view through the intubating laryngeal mask airway was assessed after the central epiglottic elevator bar had been lifted out of the field of vision by an 8-mm Euromedical tracheal tube, which was inserted to a depth of 18 cm. The fibreoptic view from the aperture bars of the laryngeal mask was recorded. RESULTS: The vocal cords were viewed less frequently through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (52%) than through the laryngeal mask airway (92%) [difference = 40% (95% CI = 26% to 54%), P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: The view of the laryngeal inlet is better through the laryngeal mask airway than through a tracheal tube inserted to 18 cm in the intubating laryngeal mask.     

Use of the intubating laryngeal mask airway to facilitate awake orotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine disorders.

Airway management in patients with unstable cervical spines remains a challenge for anesthesia providers. Because neurologic evaluations may be required following tracheal intubation and positioning for the surgical procedure, an awake intubation technique is desirable in this patient population. In this report, we describe the use of an intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) to facilitate awake tracheal intubation in two patients with cervical spine disorders. After topical local analgesia, the ILMA was inserted easily, and a tracheal tube was passed through the glottic opening without complications. Thus, the ILMA may be an acceptable alternative to the fiberoptic bronchoscope for awake tracheal intubation.     

The intubating laryngeal mask airway facilitates tracheal intubation in the lateral position

Although the difficulty of tracheal intubation in the lateral position has not been systematically evaluated, airway loss during surgery in a laterally positioned patient may have hazardous consequences. We explored whether the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) facilitates tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway anatomy, i.e., Mallampati grade or=5 cm, positioned in the lateral position. We evaluated whether this technique can be used as a rescue when the airway is lost during the middle of surgery in laterally positioned patients with respect to success rate and intubation time. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl, and vecuronium in 50 patients undergoing spine surgery for lumbar disk herniation (Lateral) and 50 undergoing other surgical procedures (Supine). Patients having disk surgery (Lateral) were positioned on their right or left sides before induction of general anesthesia, and intubation was performed in that position. Patients in the control group (Supine) were anesthetized in supine position, and intubation was performed in that position. Intubation was performed blindly via an ILMA in both groups. The time required for intubation and number and types of adjusting maneuvers used were recorded. Data were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test, chi(2) test, or unpaired Student's t-test, as appropriate. Data presented as mean (SD). Demographic and airway measures were similar in the two groups, except for mouth opening, which was slightly wider in patients in the lateral position: 5.1 (0.9) versus 4.6 (0.7) cm. The time required for intubation was similar in each group ( approximately 25 s), as was intubation success (96%). We conclude that blind intubation via an ILMA offers a frequent success rate and a clinically acceptable intubation time (<1 min) even in the lateral position. IMPLICATIONS: Blind intubation via the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) offers frequent success and a clinically acceptable intubation time even in patients in the lateral position.     

Use of the intubating laryngeal mask in children: an evaluation using video-endoscopic monitoring

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The intubating laryngeal mask is designed to act as a ventilatory device and as an aid to blind tracheal intubation in adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the intubating laryngeal mask for ventilation of the lungs and tracheal intubation in children using video-endoscopic control. METHODS: The handling and efficacy of the size 3 intubating laryngeal mask for tracheal intubation in 80 children weighing > or = 25 kg were assessed under video-endoscopic control. Ease of intubating laryngeal mask insertion, adequacy of lung ventilation through the intubating laryngeal mask and airway sealing pressures were recorded. Tracheal intubation was performed blindly by the intubator, while the supervisor observed the procedure on the video display. If blind intubation failed at the first attempt, the monitor view was used to guide the tracheal tube into the trachea. The success rate and time required for successfully placing the tracheal tube were recorded. RESULTS: Insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask was easy in all children. Lung ventilation through the intubating laryngeal mask was uniformly excellent. Blind tracheal intubation at the first attempt was successful in 53 children (66%) within 18.8 +/- 4.1 s. Twenty-four of the 27 failed blind intubation attempts were successfully intubated with video-endoscopic guidance within 28.6 +/- 9.4 s. Two children required replacing the intubating laryngeal mask, one child had to be intubated conventionally. CONCLUSIONS: The size 3 intubating laryngeal mask provides an airway that is easy to establish in children > or = 25 kg with excellent ventilation conditions and allows blind tracheal intubation at the first attempt with a high success rate. Endoscopic monitoring improves its safety and intubation success rate.     

Intra-ocular pressure changes associated with intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask airway compared with conventional laryngoscopy

This open, prospective, randomised study was designed to evaluate the changes in intra-ocular pressure and haemodynamics after tracheal intubation using either the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) or direct laryngoscopy. Sixty adult patients, ASA physical status 1 or 2 with normal intra-ocular pressure were randomly allocated to one of the two techniques. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol followed by rocuronium. Tracheal intubation was performed using either the ILMA or Macintosh laryngoscope. Intra-ocular pressure, heart rate and blood pressure were measured immediately before and after tracheal intubation and then minutely for five minutes. In the laryngoscopy group there was a significant increase in intra-ocular pressure (from 7.2+/-1.4 to 16.8+/-5.3 mmHg, P<0.01), which did not return to pre-intubation levels within five minutes, and also in mean arterial pressure after tracheal intubation, which returned to baseline levels after five minutes. In the ILMA group there were no significant changes in intra-ocular pressure (from 7.6+/-1.8 to 10.4+/-2.8 mmHg, P >0.05) or mean arterial pressure after tracheal intubation. Time to successful intubation was longer with the ILMA, 56.8+/-7.8 seconds, compared with the laryngoscopy group, 33+/-3.6 seconds (P<0.01). Mucosal trauma was more frequent with the ILMA (eight of 30) compared with the laryngoscopy group (three of 30) (P<0.01). The postoperative complications were comparable. In terms of minimising increases in intra-ocular pressure and blood pressure, we conclude that the ILMA has an advantage over direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation.     

Lightwand intubation using the Trachlight™: a brief review of current knowledge

PURPOSE: About 1% to 3% of laryngoscopic intubations can be difficult or impossible. Light-guided intubation has been proven to be an effective, safe, and simple technique. This article reviews current knowledge about the newer version lightwand: the Trachlight (TL). SOURCE: To determine its clinical utility and limitations, we reviewed the current literature (book and journal articles) on the TL since its introduction in 1995. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: TL has been shown to be useful both in oral and nasal intubation for patients with difficult airways. It may also be useful in "emergency" situations or when direct laryngoscopy or fiberoptic endoscopy is not effective, such as with patients who have copious secretions or blood in the oropharynx. TL can also be used for tracheal intubation in conjunction with other devices (laryngeal mask airway -LMA-, intubating LMA, direct laryngoscopy). However, TL should be avoided in patients with tumours, infections, trauma or foreign bodies in the upper airway. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the clinical reports available, the TL has proven to be a useful option for tracheal intubation. In addition, the device can also be used together with other intubating devices, such as the intubating LMA and the laryngoscope, to improve intubating success rates. A clear understanding of the principle of transillumination of the TL, and an appreciation of its indications, contraindications, and limitations, will improve the effectiveness of the device as well as reducing the likelihood of complications. Finally, regular practice with the TL with routine surgical patients requiring tracheal intubation will further improve intubation success rates.     

Large goitre causing difficult intubation and failure to intubate using the intubating laryngeal mask airway: lessons for next time

A 63-yr-old woman was anaesthetized for sub-total thyroidectomy. The thyroid gland was large, deviating the trachea to the right and causing 30% tracheal narrowing at the level of the suprasternal notch. Mask ventilation was easy but laryngoscopy was Cormack and Lehane grade 3. Despite being able to see the tip of the epiglottis, tracheal intubation was impossible. An intubating laryngeal mask was inserted and although the airway was clear and ventilation easy, it was not possible to intubate the trachea either blindly or with the fibreoptic bronchoscope. Tracheal intubation was eventually achieved using a 6.5- mm cuffed oral tracheal tube via a size 4 laryngeal mask under fibreoptic control. We describe the case in detail and discuss the use of the intubating laryngeal mask, its potential limitations and how to optimize its use in similar circumstances.      

Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway in Morbidly Obese and Lean Patients: A Comparative Study

Background: The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) was designed using the characteristics of healthy-weight subjects but was shown to be an effective airway device in morbidly obese patients. The authors compared airway management quality in morbidly obese and lean patients with use of the ILMA.

Methods: Fifty morbidly obese and 50 lean patients (mean body mass indexes, 42 and 27 kg/m2, respectively) were enrolled in this prospective study. After induction of general anesthesia, characteristics of airway management were judged on safety and efficiency parameters, including success rate at ventilation and intubation and airway management quality criteria, such as the number of patients who required adjustment maneuvers, the number of failed tracheal intubation attempts, the total duration of airway management, and an overall difficulty visual analog scale score.

Results: The ILMA was successfully inserted and adequate ventilation through the ILMA was achieved in all 100 patients. The success rates of tracheal intubation through the ILMA were similar in obese and lean patients (96% and 94%, respectively). The numbers of failed blind tracheal access attempts and patients who required airway-adjustment maneuvers were significantly reduced in obese patients as compared with lean patients. Four obese patients experienced transient episodes of oxygen desaturation (oxygen saturation < 90%) before adequate bag ventilation was established with the ILMA.     

The intubating laryngeal mask airway compared with direct laryngoscopy

We have compared the ability of naive intubators to intubate the trachea using a laryngoscope and an intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) after receiving basic training, in a randomized, prospective, crossover study in 60 patients. Ventilation of the lungs via the ILMA was also compared with ventilation with a face mask. There was no significant difference in successful intubation between the techniques (38 of 89 with the ILMA and 33 of 93 with direct laryngoscopy; ns). In patients in whom participants failed in their intubation attempts with the ILMA, investigators achieved success in 89% (16 of 18). Satisfactory ventilation was more common with the ILMA (50 of 51) than with the face mask (43 of 60) (P = 0.0001). A total of 98% (89 of 91) of ILMA were inserted successfully, with a mean insertion time of 19.6 s, and 78% (69/89) of these insertions were achieved in less than 26 s. The ILMA may be useful for emergency oxygenation and ventilation, but these results do not support its use for intubation by those not trained in advanced airway management and ILMA use.      

The intubating laryngeal mask airway: an initial assessment of performance

A new prototype of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), was used to facilitate tracheal intubation in 100 fasted patients presenting for elective surgery. Alignment of the ILMA with the larynx was assessed fibreoptically before intubation without the investigator performing the intubation being aware of the view score. Ease of intubation correlated with the view obtained and with the degree of manipulation of the ILMA needed to achieve tracheal intubation. Intubation was successful in 93 patients. Of the seven intubation failures, five occurred in the first 20 patients. Conventional connection to the breathing system and ventilation of the lungs of the patients were possible throughout the intubation procedure.      

Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway with the fiberoptic intubation in anticipated difficult airway management

BACKGROUND: The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA; Fastrach; Laryngeal Mask Company, Henley-on-Thames, UK) may provide an alternative technique to fiberoptic intubation (FIB) to facilitate the management of the anticipated difficult airway. The authors therefore compared the effectiveness of the ILMA with FIB in patients with anticipated difficult intubation. METHODS: One hundred patients, with at least one difficult intubation criteria (Mallampati class III or IV, thyromental distance < 65 mm, interincisor distance < 35 mm) were enrolled (FIB group, n = 49; ILMA group, n = 51) in this prospective randomized study. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with alfentanil and propofol after an efficient mask ventilation has been demonstrated. The success of the technique (within three attempts), the number of attempts, duration of the successful attempt, and adverse events (oxygen saturation < 90%, bleeding) were recorded. RESULTS: The rate of successful tracheal intubation with ILMA was 94% and comparable with FIB (92%). The number of attempts and the time to succeed were not significantly different between groups. In case of failure of the first technique, the alternative technique always succeeded. Failures in FIB group were related to oxygen desaturation (oxygen saturation < 90%) and bleeding, and to previous cervical radiotherapy in the ILMA group. Adverse events occurred significantly more frequently in FIB group than in ILMA group (18 vs. 0%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The authors obtained a high success rate and comparable duration of tracheal intubation with ILMA and FIB techniques. In patients with previous cervical radiotherapy, the use of ILMA cannot be recommended. Nevertheless, the use of the ILMA was associated with fewer adverse events.