Telegraph antegrade nailing in the treatment of humeral fractures with rotator interval split technique

Twenty-four proximal humeral fractures were treated by surgical internal fixation with a locked antegrade intramedullary nail. The purpose of this paper was to assess the clinical outcomes of proximal epiphyseal and diaphyseal humeral fractures treated with an antegrade humeral nail implanted after an interval rotator split. We treated six proximal epiphyseal fractures and seven bifocal fractures of the epiphysis and shaft and eleven diaphyseal fractures. The mean follow-up was 23 months (range 12 to 34 months). Twenty patients were available for follow-up. All but two fractures progressed to healing. The Mean Constant score was 80%, Relative Constant score was 95.5%. We divided the clinical outcomes by fracture pattern to define the best surgical indication. There were good clinical outcomes in all three groups, but the clinical score was highest in the shaft fracture group. An intramedullary antegrade nail inserted through the interval rotator without penetrating the rotator cuff had a good clinical outcome and with certain fracture types can be an effective and satisfactory device.     

Der „AO/ASIF-Flexnail“

BACKGROUND: The use of conventional implants for intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures is associated with specific difficulties. During antegrade implantation structures of the rotator cuff can be affected leading to a reduced functional result of the shoulder. If the nail is implanted in a retrograde manner problems arise due to a relatively large hole close to or within the olecranon fossa, which is necessary for insertion of the nail. Supracondylar fractures as well as persistent elbow pain and loss of function are reported in the literature. To overcome these disadvantages a flexible nail has been developed that can be stiffened and locked after implantation. METHOD: Between October 2000 and February 2002, 34 patients were treated with the flexible nail at our institution; 29 were available for follow-up. Fracture healing was documented on radiographs and clinical outcome was evaluated with use of the Constant as well as the Kwasny score. RESULTS: Median duration until fracture consolidation was 10 weeks. In two patients fracture union was not achieved within the follow-up period. The median outcome measured with the Constant score was 93 points and 2.5 with the Kwasny score. Both values correspond to a very good functional outcome. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the flexible humeral nail is an excellent treatment option for humeral shaft fractures. Damage to the rotator cuff and the distal humerus can be avoided due to its unique flexible construction, improving the functional outcome of intramedullary nailing for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.     

Functional long-term outcome of the shoulder after antegrade intramedullary nailing in humeral diaphyseal fractures

Intramedullary nailing is one of the most commonly used surgical treatments for humeral diaphyseal fractures. Once an intramedullary fixation technique has been selected, the choice between antegrade or retrograde approach remains controversial. Forty patients with humeral diaphyseal fracture treated with Seidel antegrade intramedullary nailing through an "danterior deltoid incision" (ADI) were evaluated after an average period of 62 months. Clinical and functional evaluation of the shoulder was performed using the Constant Score. Results were excellent in 33 patients, good in 5 and acceptable in 2. Radiological assessment was performed using antero-posterior (AP) and latero-lateral (LL) radiographs of the humerus and AP and Neer radiographs of the shoulder. Radiographic findings demonstrated good consolidation of all fractures; nail and locking proximal screw malpositioning were detected in 2 cases (2 patients with acceptable results). The positive results obtained for shoulder function correlate with patient age and demonstrate that antegrade intramedullary nailing is a valid option for the treatment of humeral diaphyseal fractures, as long as it is performed through ADI access and with the appropriate surgical technique. Surgical technical errors will lead to functional problems of the shoulder, which in some cases will not be completely eliminated even after nail removal.     

Multiloc髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析

目的探讨Multiloc髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。 方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2017年7月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科采用Multiloc髓内钉治疗并获得完整随访资料的33例肱骨近端骨折患者，年龄44~83岁，平均（68.7±15.7）岁；其中Neer分型二部分骨折22例，三部分骨折11例。分别记录手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合情况及手术并发症，采用视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale，VAS）及Constant-Murley评分评价患者术后肩关节功能情况。 结果手术均顺利完成，平均手术时间为93.2 min（70~150 min），术中平均出血量为108.2 ml（30~200 ml）。随访时间最短13个月，最长40个月，平均随访时间为（22.4±7.3）个月。末次随访平均肩关节疼痛评分0.47分（0~2分）。骨折平均愈合时间为（15.7±2.9）周，肩关节活动平均活动范围：前屈140.2°，外展135.9°，内旋36.0°，外旋54.4°。术后平均Constant评分为（85.9±10.8）分，其中优11例、良17例、一般3例，优良率为90.9%。末次随访时无一例发生切口感染、骨折不愈合及肩袖损伤等并发症。 结论Multiloc髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折具有手术创伤小、并发症少、内固定物牢固、关节功能恢复优良，对肱骨近端Neer分型二部分和三部分骨折有满意的治疗效果。     

肱骨干骨折顺行与逆行髓内针固定的病例 对照研究

目的：比较肱骨干骨折顺行与逆行髓内针固定的疗效。方法：入选1999年3月至2006年10月间有完整随访资料的肱骨干骨折105例,分为顺行髓内针组（A组）82例,逆行髓内针组（B组）23例。对两组的手术时间、术中出血量、并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间、骨折愈合率、Constant—Murley肩关节功能评分和Mayo肘关节功能评分等指标进行比较。结果：随访时间平均（31．2±20．9）个月。两组的手术时间、骨折愈合时间、愈合率及并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。B组术中出血量大于A组（P=0．002）。A组有4例（4．9％）不愈合,8例（9．8％）发生肩痛伴肩关节活动度减小,B组3例（13．0％）术中发生医源性骨折。A组肩关节功能评分低于B组（P=0．04）,肘关节功能评分两组比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论：顺行与逆行髓内针固定均是治疗肱骨干骨折的有效方法,但逆行髓内针固定医源性骨折发生率较高,应正确选择和制备髓内针入点。顺行髓内针固定有较高的肩痛和肩关节活动度减小的并发症发生率,注意将髓内针尾埋于肩袖下方,细致保护和修复肩袖,术后进行合理的康复练习,有利于减少肩痛和改善肩关节功能。     

Intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures with a locking flexible nail

BACKGROUND: Studies on intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures in the orthopaedic literature have shown mixed results. The purpose of this investigation was to document the clinical outcome and complications associated with the use of a new flexible, locking intramedullary nail that can be implanted in the humerus in either a retrograde or an antegrade manner without violating the rotator cuff mechanism or damaging the articular surface of the humeral head. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with fifty-one humeral shaft fractures were entered into our prospective clinical outcome study. The fracture was classified on the basis of the anatomic location and pattern. Implant positioning and fracture alignment were assessed postoperatively. Complications were recorded, and the time to union was measured. Shoulder function was evaluated with use of a combination of the Constant shoulder score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) clinical outcome data, range-of-motion measurements, and a subjective pain-rating scale. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with forty-two fractures had an adequate duration of clinical follow-up (a mean of twenty-two months) for analysis. Thirty-nine fractures healed, with a mean time to clinical union of twelve weeks (range, four to fifty weeks). Thirty-eight of the forty-two shoulders had minimal or no pain. Thirty-six shoulders had a full range of motion. The mean Constant shoulder score was 90 points. Four patients had five complications, which included two nonunions, two hardware failures, and one wound infection. All four patients had been managed with a 7.5-mm nail. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that an age of more than fifty years was associated with a lower Constant score and that the occurrence of a complication was associated with a lower physical component score on the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: The flexible humeral nail allows both retrograde and antegrade implantation and static locking. Nail insertion can be accomplished without violating the rotator cuff or damaging the articular surface of the humeral head. Although the nail functioned well in most of our patients, the use of a small-diameter (7.5-mm) nail was associated with a higher complication rate. This implant should be used with caution in any patient with a medullary canal diameter of 相似文献   

Ergebnisse der Versorgung instabiler Oberarmkopffrakturen bei geriatrischen Patienten mit einem neuen winkelstabilen antegraden Marknagelsystem

Treating unstable proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis and limited compliance is still demanding for trauma surgeons. The failure rate of operative treatment is high. We studied the use of a new antegrade intramedullary humeral nail with special locking bolts for head fixation. The first 41 procedures in 39 patients with a mean age of 81 years (61-102) were analyzed. Half of the patients were mentally deranged. There were 16 two-part, 22 three-part, and 3 four-part fractures of the humeral head treated. After closed or partial open reduction, antegrade nailing was performed via a delta split and limited incision of the rotator cuff. Greater and lesser tuberosities were fixed with screws through threaded holes of the proximal nail leading to high stability. Early functional active treatment was performed avoiding maximal rotation. Follow-up was 13 months (7-21 months). Clinical examination was performed in 32 cases. Four patients were questioned by phone. Three patients died (mean age: 92 years) before follow-up. The mean Constant score was 57+/-12. The mean age-related and side-related Constant scores were 86+/-17% and 90+/-7%. All fractures healed. Activities of daily life were possible in every case. There was only one loss of reduction after a fall out of bed. After hemiarthroplasty the patient was excluded from the study. One shaft fissure occurred during distal interlocking and healed uneventfully. Because of stable fixation, rehabilitation without immobilization was possible and led to good functional results. In comparison to common implants, the new antegrade intramedullary nail allowed a stable osteosynthesis in unstable proximal humeral fractures in old and very old patients with limited compliance without the usual implant-related complications.     

Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade intramedullary locking nail

Antegrade interlocked humeral nailing for stabilization of humeral fractures was introduced many years ago, and studies on this method in the orthopedic literature have shown mixed results. The purpose of this investigation was to document the clinical outcome and complications associated with the use of an antegrade intramedullary nail (T2, Stryker) for the humeral fractures. Between 2005 and 2008, 52 fractures of the humeral shaft were treated operatively with this intramedullary nail in our department. Eight patients were polytraumatized, and four patients had an open fracture. The mean age of patients was 51.7 years. Forty-eight patients had an adequate duration of clinical follow-up (a mean of 18 months) for analysis. Complications were recorded, and the time to union was measured. Shoulder and elbow functions were assessed using the Constant Score and the Morrey Score, respectively. Forty-six fractures healed, with a mean time to clinical union of 10.3 weeks. Two patients developed pseudarthroses. There were four adverse events: two proximal screws backed out, one superficial infection at the insertion point, and one fracture at the distal end of the nail. Ninety-one percentage of patients had an excellent or good shoulder function. Five further operations were necessary: two for treatment of pseudarthroses, two for removal the backed out proximal screws, and one wound debridement for superficial infection. Antegrade humeral nailing is a valid therapeutic option for stabilization of humeral shaft fractures. By strictly adhering to the operation technique, the number and the severity of complications can be reduced. When good fracture alignment and stability are obtained, uneventful bone healing with good functional results is the rule.     

Fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the Polarus nail

Thirty patients with fractures of the proximal humerus were treated by internal fixation with an intramedullary locked nail. Fourteen of these patients were more than 60 years of age; 23 patients had 2-part fractures (surgical neck fractures) and were operated on within an average of 3 days after injury. At follow-up, 20 (80%) of 25 patients showed satisfactory to excellent functional outcomes, as measured by Constant score. All but 1 fracture progressed to clinical and radiologic union. The good functional results indicate that the Polarus nail is a satisfactory mechanical device that can be used in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in both the young and the elderly with osteopenic bone.     

Humeral shaft fractures treated with antegrade intramedullary nailing: What are the consequences for the rotator cuff?

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and sonographic impact on the rotator cuff (RC) of the use of the anterolateral approach for nailing.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of 48 patients treated for humeral diaphyseal fractures at the University Hospital of Parma between 2007 and 2011 was analysed. Inclusion criteria were (1) acute humeral shaft fractures treated with T2-proximal humeral nail (PHN) and (2) a minimum follow-up of one year. Exclusion criteria were (1) history of proximal and metaphyseal humeral fractures, (2) pathological fractures or open fractures of the humerus, and (3) RC lesions. Clinical assessment using the Constant score, simple shoulder test and through shoulder examination tests was carried out. The sonographic study investigated the integrity of the RC.

Results

Mean score on Constant’s scale was 78.21 points, with most patients achieving a good result (79 % obtained more than 65 points). One patient had a limited functional outcome (Constant’s score of 49 points). The sonographic findings described for supraspinatus tendon were a partial ruptures of less than 30 mm in three patients and a complete tendon rupture in one case.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that the use of the anterolateral approach for antegrade humeral nailing ensures a good functional result with no significant clinical-sonographic impact on the rotator cuff and a satisfactory long term clinical outcome.     

Six-year experience with antegrade intramedullary nail for the treatment of proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures

Background

Proximal and shaft humeral fractures are very common worldwide; surgical treatment can be a viable option to reduce limb immobilization and to allow the patient an earlier return to daily activities. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with intramedullary nail in our Institute from January 2010 to December 2016.

Materials and methods

This is an observational cohort study. Inclusion criteria were: traumatic proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures treated with antegrade nail; a minimum follow-up of 6 months. We evaluated the fracture healing time, the functional recovery (using the Constant score) and postoperative complications (need of blood transfusion, infections and need of re-intervention). The t test was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Ninety-five patients were included (20 proximal and 75 diaphyseal fractures). Bone callus formation was evident a mean of 57 days after surgery. In all patients, there was an improvement in the functional recovery over time, but those younger than 65 years had better outcomes. The type of fracture and patients’ gender did not affect these results at one and 6 months of follow-up. In 18 cases, blood transfusions were needed; infections never occurred; finally, revision surgery was performed in 10 cases (two reverse total shoulder arthroplasties, one open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws and seven nail removals for intolerance).

Conclusion

In our study, intramedullary nail proved to be a minimally invasive technique with a rapid improvement in range of motion, an earlier rehabilitation and acceptable pain.

     

Stabilisation von Humeruskopffrakturen mittels antegrader winkelstabiler Verriegelungsmarknagelung (Targon PH)

An antegrade straight intramedullary nailing system with angular and sliding stable interlocking screws was employed for the treatment of dislocated 2-, 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures (standard nail) and of combined humeral head and shaft fractures (long nail version) even in the presence of manifest osteoporosis according to the principles of minimum invasive surgery. Isolated fractures of the tubercles and multiply fragmented humeral head fragments represented contraindications for the application of an intramedullary nail. The procedure allows active shoulder motion immediately postoperatively. Mid-term results of a prospective follow-up study of 50 patients with complete examinations after 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively showed good functional results with 78.8 Constant score points after 1 year, corresponding to 92% of the Constant score of the contralateral intact side. However, numerous complications were observed, mainly related to the backing out of the fixation screws. The number of the severe complications which are mentioned in the literature, such as humeral head necrosis, pseudarthrosis, infection or redislocation, was limited. Correspondingly, patients with manifest complications had a less favourable functional result (65.8 Constant score points corresponding to 73% of the contralateral intact side). Present modifications of the surgical technique for stabilization of the tubercles (additional suture cerclage fixation of fragmented tubercles) and a novel technical modification preventing the backing out mechanism of the fixation screws are expected to decrease the complication rate.     

Arthroscopical Findings after Antegrade Nailing of a Proximal Humeral Fracture

Abstract Proximal humeral fractures represent up to five percent of all fractures in adults, commonly found in elderly patients. The final functional results after different operative procedures are among other factors dependent on whether or not a rotator cuff lesion is pre-existent, prior to the fracture, and how its surgical therapy is carried out. However, to what extent prior rotator cuff tears in this special patient group contribute to the functional outcome remains widely unclear. In our institution antegrade intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for proximal humeral fractures. One critical point of this technique is the unavoidable split of the rotator cuff on the approach to the proximal humerus and the insertion of the nail through the incised cuff. We report on a case of an impingement after antegrade intramedullary nailing of a proximal humeral fracture. Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy revealed neither a residual lesion of the former rotator cuff incision nor a chondral lesion at the former insertion site of the nail. In the same session subacromial decompression and a nettoyage of adhesions were performed. We assume that splitting the rotator cuff for the insertion of an antegrade nail in a proximal humeral fracture is less relevant than previously assumed and described.     

Closed interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures with the Russell-Taylor nail

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of the Russell-Taylor humeral nail in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective with a mean radiologic and clinical follow-up at thirty-two months. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Total of thirty-seven patients treated with the Russell-Taylor humeral nail. INTERVENTION: All patients were treated with the Russell-Taylor humeral nail inserted in an antegrade fashion. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiologic union and shoulder function in terms of pain, power, range of movement, and activities of daily living. RESULTS: There were four established nonunions and four cases of delayed union (time to union > four months). Age of patient was the only predictor of nonunion. There was one infection and one intraoperative fracture. Two prominent proximal screws required removal, and one nail was removed after union because of impingement. Three patients required manipulation under anesthesia to improve shoulder movement. At review, six patients had residual poor shoulder function as per Constant score, four attributable to shoulder stiffness and two to residual pain. CONCLUSION: The authors' findings indicate a significant rate of delayed or nonunion in the elderly patient. When the high rate of union with conservative treatment is considered, the indications and rationale for intramedullary humeral nailing should be clearly defined.     

顺行旋入式髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折疗效观察

目的总结顺行旋入式髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折的临床疗效。方法24例肱骨干骨折患者采用顺行旋入式自锁髓内钉固定。结果24例均获随访,平均18．6个月,所有患者骨折均愈合,平均愈合时间23．0（21．4—24．7）周。肩关节Constant评分平均82．7（76．9—88．6）分;肘关节Mayo评分平均91．3（89．6—93．1）分;Neer评分：优19例,良5例。结论顺行旋入式髓内钓。固定手术操作简单、时间短、损伤小、术中并发症少、骨折愈合快,适合稳定性骨折和断端非缺损性粉碎性骨折,尤其适用于开放性肱骨干骨折手术。     

Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with Polarus nail fixation

A chart review of 20 patients who sustained acute proximal humeral fractures and who were treated by surgical stabilization with locked antegrade humeral intramedullary nails (Polarus nails) was undertaken. The clinical outcome measurements were fracture healing, infection, and neurologic injury. Radiologic outcome measurements included fracture alignment, loosening, fixation and hardware failure, and malunion and nonunion. Of 20 fractures, 11 healed without complications. The mean immediate postoperative and final radiographic valgus neck/shaft angulation measured 131 degrees. Of the 20 implants, 3 had proximal fixation screw loosening. Of the 20 implants, 2 underwent revision surgery for proximal fixation failure. With certain fracture types, the Polarus intramedullary humeral nail can be an effective implant. In fracture cases involving an unstable or comminuted lateral metaphyseal fracture, if the starting point extends into the greater tuberosity, fixation failure or fracture displacement may result.     

New intramedullary nail for the surgical neck fracture of the proximal humerus in elderly patients

Background Fractures of the proximal humerus are common and the repair of displaced fractures generally requires an operative approach. In elderly patients, osteoporosis makes internal fixation problematic and frequently contributes to failed fixation and poor clinical results. We have developed a new intramedullary nail (pin lock nail) for the repair of surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus in patients with osteoporotic bones. A retrospective review is presented of the cases of 19 elderly patients with two-part or three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated using the pin lock nail. Methods We treated 19 elderly patients with a mean age of 70.5 years. There were 13 two-part surgical neck fractures, 3 two-part surgical neck fractures with non-displaced greater tuberosity fracture, and 3 three-part surgical neck fractures with greater tuberosity fracture. All fractures were treated using the pin lock nail. Clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score at the last follow-up examination. On radiographic evaluation, duration to bone union of the fracture, backing out of the pin and screw, penetration of the proximal pin, and varus angulations of the humeral neck were examined. Results Mean duration of follow-up was 14 months (range 6–54 months). All fractures had united at an average of 3.3 months after surgery. No backing out of the pin and screw or penetration of the proximal locking pin was seen at the time of last follow-up. Thirteen of the 16 patients had no or minimal varus angulations of the humeral neck (≤10°). The mean overall JOA score was 84.3 points (range 65.5–100). Conclusions Our data show that using the pin lock nail for the treatment of two-part and three-part humeral fractures is a reliable procedure, providing good results with careful postoperative management.     

Intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures in children through the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter using a modified rigid humeral intramedullary nail: preliminary results of a new technique in 15 children

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical results of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures using a rigid intramedullary nail placed through the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter in older children and adolescents. DESIGN: A retrospective study was carried out evaluating all skeletally immature patients with femoral shaft fractures treated using a modified rigid humeral intramedullary nail. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen children and adolescents with displaced femoral diaphyseal fractures and open physes. INTERVENTION: Femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents were stabilized using a modified humeral intramedullary nail placed through the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients were evaluated to determine time to union, final fracture alignment, hospital stay, complications, clinical outcome, and proximal femoral changes including avascular necrosis or proximal femoral valgus with femoral neck narrowing. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year (range 70-157 weeks). The average age of the patients was 12 years and 5 months (range 8 years and 2 months-17 years and 1 month). All fractures healed at a mean of 7 weeks (range 5-14 weeks) after fracture. The average hospital stay for patients with isolated femur fractures (8/15) was 2.8 days (range 1-5 days). At an average follow-up of 141 weeks (range 70-326 weeks), no patient had developed avascular necrosis, femoral neck valgus, femoral neck narrowing, or other complications. CONCLUSIONS: The technique of intramedullary nailing in children through the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter seems to be safe, effective, and well tolerated by patients.     

TriGen肱骨钉治疗肱骨干骨折的临床应用

目的探讨TriGen肱骨钉治疗肱骨干骨折的疗效。方法采用顺行TriGen肱骨钉治疗新鲜闭合肱骨干骨折患者24例。结果患者均获随访,时间4～18个月,骨折均愈合。肩关节功能按Neer评分标准进行评价:优20例,良3例,可1例。优良率为95.8%(23/24)。无桡神经损伤、切口感染及骨不连发生。结论TriGen肱骨钉治疗肱骨干骨折,能提供足够的稳定性,可早期功能锻炼,近期临床疗效满意,尤其适合粉碎性或骨质较差的肱骨干骨折。     

Diaphyseal humeral fractures and intramedullary nailing: Can we improve outcomes?

While intramedullary nailing has been established as the treatment of choice for diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia, its role in the management of diaphyseal humeral fractures remains controversial. The reasons include not only the complicated anatomy and unique biomechanical characteristics of the arm but also the fact that surgical technique and nail designs devised for the treatment of femoral and tibial fractures are being transposed to the humerus. As a result there is no consensus on many aspects of the humeral nailing procedure, e.g., the basic nail design, nail selection criteria, timing of the procedure, and the fundamental principles of the surgical technique (e.g., antegrade/retrograde, reamed/unreamed, and static/dynamic). These issues will be analyzed and discussed in the present article. Proposals aiming to improve outcomes include the categorization of humeral nails in two distinct groups: “fixed” and “bio”, avoidance of reaming for the antegrade technique and utilization of “semi-reaming” for the retrograde technique, guidelines for reducing complications, setting the best “timing” for nailing and criteria for selecting the most appropriate surgical technique (antegrade or retrograde). Finally, suggestions are made on proper planning and conducting clinical and biomechanical studies regarding the use of intramedullary nailing in the management of humeral shaft fractures.