Metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

Purpose

The use of different definitions of the metabolic syndrome has led to inconsistent results on the association between the metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease. We examined the association between the metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease.

Methods

A MEDLINE search (1966-April 2005) was conducted to identify prospective studies that examined the association between the metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease. Information on sample size, participant characteristics, metabolic syndrome definition, follow-up duration, and endpoint assessment was abstracted.

Results

Data from 21 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. Individuals with the metabolic syndrome, compared to those without, had an increased mortality from all causes (relative risk [RR] 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.56) and cardiovascular disease (RR 1.74; 95% CI, 1.29-2.35); as well as an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease (RR 1.53; 95% CI, 1.26-1.87), coronary heart disease (RR 1.52; 95% CI, 1.37-1.69) and stroke (RR 1.76; 95% CI, 1.37-2.25). The relative risk of cardiovascular disease associated with the metabolic syndrome was higher in women compared with men and higher in studies that used the World Health Organization definition compared with studies that used the Adult Treatment Panel III definition.

Conclusion

This analysis strongly suggests that the metabolic syndrome is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality, as well as all-cause mortality. The detection, prevention, and treatment of the underlying risk factors of the metabolic syndrome should become an important approach for the reduction of the cardiovascular disease burden in the general population.     

Prognostic implications of ejection fraction from linear echocardiographic dimensions: the Strong Heart Study

Background

Although echocardiography is commonly used to assess left ventricular (LV) systolic function, few data are available concerning the prognostic significance of LV ejection fraction (EF) calculated from linear echocardiographic measurements or 2-dimensional (2-D) wall motion scores in population-based samples.

Methods

Echocardiography was used in the second Strong Heart Study (SHS) examination to calculate LV EF in 2948 American Indians without prevalent coronary heart disease; 2923 had 2-D wall motion scores.

Results

Mildly and severely reduced LV EF occurred in 10% and 2% of participants, was associated with older age, male sex, higher systolic pressure, heart rate and markers of renal disease and inflammation. During 37 ± 9 months follow-up, cardiovascular death occurred in 2%, 5% and 12% of participants with normal, mildly reduced and severely reduced EF; all cause mortality rates were 6%, 10% and 32% (both P < .001). In Cox proportional hazards analyses, adjusting for covariates, cardiovascular death was higher with mildly reduced EF (risk ratio [RR] 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.4, P = .0007) and especially with severely reduced EF (RR 6.9, 95% CI 3.0-15.9, P < .0001); all-cause mortality was increased with severe LV dysfunction (RR 4.8, 95% CI 2.8-8.1, P < .001) and marginally with mildly reduced EF (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI 0.95-2.15, P = .08). Segmental LV dysfunction and mildly and severely reduced EF from 2-D wall motion scores were associated with 3.3-fold (95% CI 1.1-9.4, P = .02), 3.5-fold (95% CI 2.1-5.8) and 3.8-fold (95% CI 1.9-7.6) (all P < .001) increased rates of cardiovascular death.

Conclusions

LV EF from linear echocardiographic measurements as well as segmental LV dysfunction and EF from 2-D wall motion scores strongly and independently predict cardiovascular mortality. Reduced EF by simple echocardiographic method has estimated population-attributable risks of about 35% for cardiovascular death and 12% for all-cause mortality in a population-based sample of middle-aged to elderly adults.     

Migraines, angiographic coronary artery disease and cardiovascular outcomes in women

Purpose

There are conflicting data regarding the association between migraines and cardiovascular events. We evaluated the relationship between migraine headaches, angiographic coronary artery disease, and cardiovascular events in women.

Subjects and Methods

The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study is a National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)-sponsored prospective, multicenter study aiming to improve ischemia evaluation in women. A total of 944 women presenting with chest pain or symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia were enrolled and underwent complete demographic, medical, and psychosocial history, physical examination, and coronary angiography testing. A smaller subset of 905 women, representing a mean age of 58 years, answered questions regarding a history of migraines. We prospectively followed 873 women for 4.4 years for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

Results

Women reporting a history of migraines (n = 220) had lower angiographic coronary severity scores, and less severe (≥ 70% luminal stenosis) angiographic coronary artery disease compared to women without a history of migraines (n = 685). These differences remained statistically significant after adjustment for age and other important cardiac risk factors. On prospective follow-up of a median of 4.4 years, women with a history of migraines were not more likely to have a cardiovascular event (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2; 95% confidence interal [CI], 0.93-1.58) and migraines did not predict all-cause mortality (HR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.49-1.99).

Conclusion

Among women undergoing coronary angiography for suspected ischemia, those reporting migraines had less severe angiographic coronary artery disease. We could not support an association between migraines and cardiovascular events or death. Further research studying the common pathophysiology underlying migraines and cardiovascular disease is warranted.     

The clinical profile and outcomes associated with coronary collaterals in patients with coronary artery disease

Background

The clinical correlates of coronary collaterals and the effects of coronary collaterals on prognosis are incompletely understood.

Methods

We performed a study of 55,751 patients undergoing coronary angiography to evaluate the correlates of angiographically apparent coronary collaterals, and to evaluate their association with survival.

Results

The characteristic most strongly associated with the presence of collaterals was a coronary occlusion (odds ratio [OR], 28.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.1-30.6). Collaterals were associated with improved adjusted survival overall (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95), and in both acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (HR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96) and non-ACS (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92) patients. Collaterals were associated with improved survival in those receiving angioplasty (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85) and those with low risk anatomy treated medically (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98), but not for those treated with coronary bypass graft surgery or those with high-risk anatomy treated without revascularization.

Conclusions

The major correlate of coronary collaterals is the presence/extent of obstructive coronary artery disease. Collaterals are associated with better survival overall and in both ACS and non-ACS presentations, but not for those treated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or those with high-risk anatomy who are not revascularized.     

Coronary artery disease, coronary revascularization, and outcomes in chronic advanced systolic heart failure

Background

Associations between coronary artery disease (CAD) and outcomes in systolic heart failure (HF) and that between coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and outcomes in patients with HF and CAD have not been examined using propensity-matched designs.

Methods

Of the 2707 patients with advanced chronic systolic HF in the Beta-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST), 1593 had a history of CAD, of whom 782 had prior CABG. Using propensity scores for CAD we assembled a cohort of 458 pairs of CAD and no-CAD patients. Propensity scores for prior CABG in those with CAD were used to assemble 500 pairs of patients with and without CABG. Matched patients were balanced on 68 baseline characteristics.

Results

All-cause mortality occurred in 33% and 24% of matched patients with and without CAD respectively, during 26 months of median follow-up (hazard ratio {HR} when CAD was compared with no-CAD, 1.41; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.11-1.81; P = 0.006). HR's (95% CIs) for CAD-associated cardiovascular mortality, HF mortality, and sudden cardiac death (SCD) were 1.53 (1.17-2.00; P = 0.002), 1.44 (0.92-2.25; P = 0.114) and 1.76 (1.21-2.57; P = 0.003) respectively. CAD had no association with hospitalization. Among matched patients with HF and CAD, all-cause mortality occurred in 32% and 39% of those with and without prior CABG respectively (HR for CABG, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.95; P = 0.015).

Conclusions

In patients with advanced chronic systolic HF, CAD is associated with increased mortality, and in those with CAD, prior CABG seems to be associated with reduced all-cause mortality but not SCD.     

Optimal Treatment Strategies in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease

Background

Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease and is associated with an increase in adverse outcomes. However, the optimal treatment strategies for patients with chronic kidney disease and coronary artery disease are yet to be defined.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for studies including at least 100 patients with chronic kidney disease (defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m² or on dialysis) and coronary artery disease treated with medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass surgery and followed for at least 1 month and reporting outcomes. The outcome evaluated was all-cause mortality. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes with revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery) when compared with medical therapy alone. In addition, outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass surgery were evaluated.

Results

The search yielded 38 nonrandomized studies that enrolled 85,731 patients. Revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery) was associated with lower long-term mortality (mean 4.0 years) when compared with medical therapy alone (relative risk [RR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.87), driven by lower mortality with percutaneous coronary intervention vs medical therapy and coronary artery bypass surgery vs medical therapy. Coronary artery bypass surgery was associated with a higher upfront risk of death (RR 1.81; 95% CI, 1.47-2.24) but a lower long-term risk of death (RR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98) when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Conclusions

In chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease, the current data from nonrandomized studies indicate lower mortality with revascularization, via either coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention, when compared with medical therapy. These associations should be tested in future randomized trials.     

Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents during Extended Follow-up

Background

Several observational reports have documented both increased and decreased cardiac mortality or Q-wave myocardial infarction with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents.

Methods

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents early after intervention (<1 year) and late (>1 year) among a broad population of patients, using a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Results

We identified 28 trials with a total of 10,727 patients and a mean follow-up of 29.6 months. For early outcomes (<1 year), all-cause mortality for drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents was 2.1% versus 2.4% (risk ratio [RR] 0.91, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-1.18]; P = .47), non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was 3.3% versus 4.4% (RR 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-1.00]; P = .055), target lesion revascularization was 5.8% versus 18.4% (RR 0.28 [95% CI, 0.21-0.38]; P <.001), and stent thrombosis was 1.1% versus 1.3% (RR 0.87 [95% CI, 0.60-1.26]; P = .47). For late outcomes (>1 year), all-cause mortality for drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents was 5.9% versus 5.7% (RR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.83-1.28]; P = .79), target lesion revascularization was 4.0% versus 3.3% (RR 1.22 [95% CI, 0.92-1.60]; P = .16), non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was 1.6% versus 1.2% (RR 1.36 [95% CI, 0.74-2.53]; P = .32) and stent thrombosis was 0.7% versus 0.1% (RR 4.57 [95% CI, 1.54-13.57]; P = .006).

Conclusions

There was no excess mortality with drug-eluting stents. Within 1 year, drug-eluting stents appear to be safe and efficacious with possibly decreased non-Q-wave myocardial infarction compared with bare-metal stents. After 1 year, drug-eluting stents still have similar mortality, despite increased stent thrombosis. The reduction in target lesion revascularization with drug-eluting stents mainly happens within 1 year, but is sustained thereafter.     

Obesity and the risk of early and late mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Background

Obesity is often considered to be a significant risk factor for postoperative mortality when selecting candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

We included all patients undergoing a first isolated CABG at the Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden, between 1980 and 1995 (n = 6728). Patients were categorized on the basis of body mass index (BMI): non-overweight (BMI <25 kg/m²), overweight (25 kg/m² ≤ BMI <30 kg/m²), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²). Multivariate Cox regression was used to assess the risk of re-operation for bleeding, deep sternal wound infection, and early (≤30 days) and late (≤5 years) mortality rates.

Results

The average length of follow-up was 6.5 years. There were 252 re-operations for bleeding, 53 deep sternal wound infections, and 628 deaths. Patients who were obese had a significantly lower risk of re-operation for bleeding (risk ratio [RR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.53), but a greater risk of deep sternal wound infection (RR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.21-5.88) compared with patients who were not overweight. However, patients who were obese and patients who were not overweight experienced similar 30-day (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.34-1.27), 1-year (RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.29-1.10), and 5-year mortality rates (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.25). Results for patients who were overweight were consistent with those of patients who were obese.

Conclusion

Patients who are obese are not at a greater risk of early and late mortality after CABG compared with patients who are not overweight, although they appear to have a lower risk of re-operation for bleeding and a greater risk of deep sternal wound infection. Therefore, obesity per se is not a contraindication for CABG.     

Risk of mortality with vitamin E supplements: the Cache County study

Purpose

A recent meta-analysis reported increased mortality in clinical trial participants randomized to high-dose vitamin E. We sought to determine whether these mortality risks with vitamin E reflect adverse consequences of its use in the presence of cardiovascular disease.

Methods

In a defined population aged 65 years or older, baseline interviews captured self- or proxy-reported history of cardiovascular illness. A medicine cabinet inventory verified nutritional supplement and medication use. Three sources identified subsequent deaths. Cox proportional hazards methods examined the association between vitamin E use and mortality.

Results

After adjustment for age and sex, there was no association in this population between vitamin E use and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.15). Predictably, deaths were more frequent with a history of diabetes, stroke, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or myocardial infarction, and with the use of warfarin, nitrates, or diuretics. None of these conditions or treatments altered the null main effect with vitamin E, but mortality was increased in vitamin E users who had a history of stroke (aHR 3.64; CI, 1.73-7.68), coronary bypass graft surgery (aHR 4.40; CI, 2.83-6.83), or myocardial infarction (aHR 1.95; CI, 1.29-2.95) and, independently, in those taking nitrates (aHR 3.95; CI, 2.04-7.65), warfarin (aHR 3.71; CI, 2.22-6.21), or diuretics (aHR 1.83; CI, 1.35-2.49). Although not definitive, a consistent trend toward reduced mortality was seen in vitamin E users without these conditions or treatments.

Conclusions

In this population-based study, vitamin E use was unrelated to mortality, but this apparently null finding seems to represent a combination of increased mortality in those with severe cardiovascular disease and a possible protective effect in those without.     

Statin therapy in stroke prevention: a meta-analysis involving 121,000 patients

Purpose

More than 120,000 patients now have taken part in randomized trials evaluating statin therapy for stroke prevention. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive review of all randomized trials and determine the therapeutic potential of statins for all strokes.

Methods

We searched 10 electronic databases (from inception to December 2006). We additionally contacted study authors and authors of previous reviews. We extracted data on study characteristics and outcomes related to all-cause mortality, all-stroke incidence, specific type of strokes, and cholesterol changes. We pooled data using a random-effects model and conducted meta-regression.

Results

We included 42 trials assessing statin therapy for all-stroke prevention (n = 121,285), resulting in a pooled relative risk (RR) of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.91). The pooled RR of statin therapy for all-cause mortality (n = 116,080) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.93). Each unit increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) resulted in a 0.3% increased RR of death (P = .02). Seventeen trials evaluated statins on cardiovascular death (n = 57,599, RR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.74-0.90), and 11 evaluated nonhemorrhagic cerebrovascular events (n = 58,604, RR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.69-0.94). Eleven trials reported hemorrhagic stroke incidence (total n = 54,334, RR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.68-1.30) and 21 trials reported on fatal strokes (total n = 82,278, RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.80-1.21). Only one trial reported on statin therapy for secondary prevention.

Conclusions

Statin therapy provides high levels of protection for all-cause mortality and nonhemorrhagic strokes. This overview reinforces the need to consider prolonged statin treatment in patients at high risk of major vascular events, but caution remains for patients at risk of bleeds.     

Diabetes and Coronary Heart Disease as Risk Factors for Mortality in Older Adults

Background

Type 2 diabetes has been described as a coronary heart disease (CHD) “risk equivalent.” We tested whether cardiovascular and all-cause mortality rates were similar between participants with prevalent CHD vs diabetes in an older adult population in whom both glucose disorders and preexisting atherosclerosis are common.

Methods

The Cardiovascular Health Study is a longitudinal study of men and women (n = 5784) aged ≥65 years at baseline who were followed from baseline (1989/1992-1993) through 2005 for mortality. Diabetes was defined by fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L or use of diabetes control medications. Prevalent CHD was determined by confirmed history of myocardial infarction, angina, or coronary revascularization.

Results

Following multivariable adjustment for other cardiovascular disease risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis, CHD mortality risk was similar between participants with CHD alone vs diabetes alone (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.30). The proportion of mortality attributable to prevalent diabetes (population-attributable risk percent = 8.4%) and prevalent CHD (6.7%) was similar in women, but the proportion of mortality attributable to CHD (16.5%) as compared with diabetes (6.4%) was markedly higher in men. Patterns were similar for cardiovascular disease mortality. By contrast, the adjusted relative hazard of total mortality was lower among participants with CHD alone (HR 0.85, 95% CI, 0.75-0.96) as compared with those who had diabetes alone.

Conclusions

Among older adults, diabetes alone confers a risk for cardiovascular mortality similar to that from established clinical CHD. The public health burden of both diabetes and CHD is substantial, particularly among women.     

Baseline serum uric acid level as a predictor of cardiovascular disease related mortality and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis of prospective studies

Objective

Serum uric acid (SUA) levels have been used to predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality event, but the data have yielded conflicting results. We investigated whether SUA was an independent predictor for cardiovascular or all-cause mortality with prospective studies by meta-analysis.

Methods

Pubmed and Embase were searched without language restrictions for publications available till April 2013. Only prospective studies on cardiovascular or all-cause mortality related to SUA levels were included. Pooled adjust relative risk (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated separately for the highest vs. lowest category or the lowest vs. middle category.

Results

For the highest SUA, eleven studies with 172,123 participants were identified and analyzed. Elevated SUA increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.09–1.42) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.19–1.57). Subgroup analyses showed that elevated SUA significantly increase the risk of all-cause mortality among men (RR 1.23; 95% CI 1.08–1.42), but not in women (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.79–1.39). Risk of cardiovascular mortality appeared to be more pronounced among women (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.06–1.72). The association between extremely low SUA and mortality was reported in three studies; we did not perform a pooled analysis because of high degree of heterogeneity in these studies.

Conclusions

Baseline SUA level is an independent predictor for future cardiovascular mortality. Elevated SUA appears to significantly increase the risk of all-cause mortality in men, but not in women. Whether low SUA levels are predictors of mortality is still inconclusive.     

Outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and myocardial infarction

Background

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an increased risk for accelerated atherosclerosis. It is unknown, however, whether rheumatoid arthritis also increases in-hospital mortality after a myocardial infarction or influences the therapy patients receive.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis of 1,112,676 patients with myocardial infarction in the 2003-2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample was performed.

Results

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were 39% more likely to receive medical therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.49) than interventional therapy. By using logistic regression, we adjusted for confounding variables to determine the effect of rheumatoid arthritis on the selection of therapy and found that rheumatoid arthritis itself was associated with a 38% increased likelihood of undergoing thrombolysis (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71) and a 27% increased likelihood of undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.39). For the primary outcome measure, we determined that patients with rheumatoid arthritis overall had a 24% better in-hospital mortality compared with other patients with a myocardial infarction (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.86), which was 34% better after adjusting for confounding variables (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.74). This better in-hospital mortality was seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing medical therapy (adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.75) and percutaneous coronary intervention (adjusted OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32-0.70), but not in patients undergoing thrombolysis or coronary artery bypass grafting.

Conclusions

Among patients with myocardial infarction, rheumatoid arthritis was associated with an increased use of thrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention. Moreover, patients with rheumatoid arthritis had an in-hospital survival advantage, particularly those undergoing medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Prevalence of structural cardiac abnormalities in patients with myotonic dystrophy type I

Background

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a neurological disorder with known cardiac involvement, including conduction disturbances, arrhythmias, and ventricular dysfunction. We studied which clinical and electrocardiographic features are associated with structural cardiac abnormalities.

Methods

History, physical examination, electrocardiography, and genetic testing were performed on 382 patients with DM1, and cardiac imaging was performed on 100 of these patients.

Results

Clinical congestive heart failure was found in 7 of the 382 patients (1.8%). Structural cardiac abnormalities determined with cardiac imaging included left ventricular hypertrophy (19.8%), left ventricular dilatation (18.6%), left ventricular systolic dysfunction (14.0%), mitral valve prolapse (13.7%), regional wall motion abnormality (11.2%), and left atrial dilatation (6.3%). Left ventricular systolic dysfunction was associated with increasing age (relative risk [RR], 1.9 per decade; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2; P = .02), cytosine-thymine-guanine (CTG) repeat length (RR, 2.8 per 500 repeats; 95% CI, 1.3-6.3; P = .01), P-R >200 ms (RR, 14.7; 95% CI, 3.0-73.1; P = .001), and QRS >120 ms (RR, 5.7; 95% CI, 1.5-21.8; P = .01). P-R >200 ms was predictive of regional wall motion abnormalities. QRS >120 ms correlated with regional wall motion abnormalities and left atrial dilatation.

Conclusions

Several clinical and electrocardiographic findings in patients with DM1 are significantly associated with structural heart abnormalities. These results suggest an underlying genetic and pathophysiologic correlate that may lead to cardiac disease in these patients.     

Low-dose aspirin in patients with stable cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

Objective

Many recommendations for aspirin in stable cardiovascular disease are based on analyses of all antiplatelet therapies at all dosages and in both stable and unstable patients. Our objective was to evaluate the benefit and risk of low-dose aspirin (50-325 mg/d) in patients with stable cardiovascular disease.

Methods

Secondary prevention trials of low-dose aspirin in patients with stable cardiovascular disease were identified by searches of the MEDLINE database from 1966 to 2006. Six randomized trials were identified that enrolled patients with a prior myocardial infarction (MI) (n = 1), stable angina (n = 1), or stroke/transient ischemic attack (n = 4). A random effects model was used to combine results from individual trials.

Results

Six studies randomized 9853 patients. Aspirin therapy was associated with a significant 21% reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events (nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and cardiovascular death) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.88), 26% reduction in the risk of nonfatal MI (95% CI, 0.60-0.91), 25% reduction in the risk of stroke (95% CI, 0.65-0.87), and 13% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (95% CI, 0.76-0.98). Patients treated with aspirin were significantly more likely to experience severe bleeding (odds ratio 2.2, 95% CI, 1.4-3.4). Treatment of 1000 patients for an average of 33 months would prevent 33 cardiovascular events, 12 nonfatal MIs, 25 nonfatal strokes, and 14 deaths, and cause 9 major bleeding events. Among those with ischemic heart disease, aspirin was most effective at reducing the risk of nonfatal MI and all-cause mortality; however, among those with cerebrovascular disease, aspirin was most effective at reducing the risk of stroke.

Conclusion

In patients with stable cardiovascular disease, low-dose aspirin therapy reduces the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, and increases the risk of severe bleeding.     

Predictors of cardiologist care for older patients hospitalized for heart failure

Background

Studies have suggested that cardiologists may provide higher quality heart failure care than generalists. However, national rates of specialty care during hospitalization for heart failure and factors associated with care by a cardiologist are unknown.

Methods

We assessed specialty care in a sample of Medicare patients hospitalized nationwide with heart failure between 1998 and 1999 (n = 25,869). Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models were used to identify factors independently associated with treatment by a cardiologist.

Results

One-quarter (25.5%) of patients had a cardiologist as their attending physician, 31.3% of patients received a cardiology consult, and 43.2% of patients were not treated by a cardiologist during hospitalization. Older patients (age <75 years: referent; age 75-84 years: risk ratio [RR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98; age ≥85 years: RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74-0.88) and women (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93) were less likely to have an attending cardiologist. Patients with a history of heart failure (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.20), coronary disease (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.14-1.32), coronary artery bypass grafting (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.32-1.42), or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.19-1.42) were more likely to be treated by a cardiologist, whereas patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.70-0.79) and dementia (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.70) were less likely to be treated by a cardiologist. Patient race was not associated with treatment by a cardiologist. The strongest predictors of attending cardiology care were hospital factors, including large volume (>300 beds; RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.32-1.42) and geographic location (RR, 1.00 Northeast (referent) vs RR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.46-0.65 Midwest).

Conclusions

Slightly more than half of older patients with heart failure received care from a cardiologist. Several patient characteristics, including age and sex, were associated with the use of specialty care, suggesting that factors other than clinical presentation may independently influence the use of specialty care.     

Impact of NSAIDS on mortality and the effect of preexisting coronary artery disease in US veterans

Background

Evidence indicates increased risk of cardiovascular events with certain nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use; however, less is known about NSAID use and mortality. In addition, it is unclear whether risks observed with NSAIDs are modified by coronary artery disease (CAD). The association between NSAID exposure and mortality, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular events was examined.

Methods

A nested case-control study in a cohort of 565,451 US veterans with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis was conducted. The cohort was divided into those with preexisting CAD (16,869 cases) and those without (11,912 cases). Up to 20 controls were selected for each case.

Results

The average age of participants was 69.8 years (non-CAD) and 71.8 years (CAD). Relative to no exposure, adjusted odds ratios for cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events for any NSAID were 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.21) in the non-CAD group and 1.18 (95% CI, 1.11-1.27) in the CAD group. Exposure to NSAIDs was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality in both the non-CAD (0.72, 95% CI, 0.68-0.77) and CAD (0.79, 95% CI, 0.73-0.86) groups.

Conclusions

As in previous reports, there was an increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events for NSAIDs. However, NSAID exposure was associated with a reduced risk of death. This study raises important questions about NSAIDs in patients with osteoarthritis given that they seem to increase the risk of cardiovascular events but decrease overall mortality.     

The role of red blood cell distribution width in mortality and cardiovascular risk among patients with coronary artery diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Red cell distribution width (RDW) might be a novel biomarker that reflects multiple physiological impairments related to atherosclerosis and coronary artery diseases (CAD). We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of RDW between all-cause mortality and fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in CAD patients.

Methods

Relevant studies were searched and identified in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. English-language prospective studies that reported risk estimates for RDW and mortality/CVD events were included. Data were extracted regarding the characteristics and clinical outcomes, and a quality assessment was conducted. Results were extracted for the highest versus lowest RDW level, and meta-analyses were carried out using random effects models.

Results

We identified 22 studies enrolling 80,216 participants. The study duration ranged between 1 month and 23 years. Of the 15 studies that were included in the meta-analysis, higher RDW indicated a significant increased risk for all-cause mortality in CAD patients: pooled risk ratio (RR) 2.20 (95% CI, 1.42-3.39; P<0.0004). The results for fatal, non-fatal and fatal/non-fatal events were: pooled RR 1.80 (95% CI, 1.35-2.41; P<0.0001), RR 1.86 (95% CI, 1.50-2.31; P<0.00001) and RR 2.13 (95% CI, 1.20-3.77; P=0.01). Heterogeneity was moderately present; however, sensitivity analyses for follow-up duration, CAD subtype, or RDW as dichotomous values showed similar results.

Conclusions

The meta-analysis indicates that higher RDW levels are associated with increased risk of mortality and CVD events in patients with established CAD.     

Effect of aspirin on mortality in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Objective

The lack of a mortality benefit of aspirin in prior meta-analyses of primary prevention trials of cardiovascular disease has contributed to uncertainty about the balance of benefits and risks of aspirin in primary prevention. We performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of aspirin to obtain best estimates of the effect of aspirin on mortality in primary prevention.

Methods

Eligible articles were identified by searches of electronic databases and reference lists. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. Data were pooled from individual trials using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, and results are presented as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Nine randomized controlled trials enrolling 100,076 participants were included. Aspirin reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-1.00), myocardial infarction (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-1.00), ischemic stroke (RR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98), and the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death (RR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94), but did not reduce cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84-1.09). Aspirin increased the risk of hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.36; 95% CI, 1.01-1.82), major bleeding (RR 1.66; 95% CI, 1.41-1.95), and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.37; 95% CI, 1.15-1.62). A lack of availability of patient-level data precluded exploration of benefits and risks of aspirin in key subgroups.

Conclusion

Aspirin prevents deaths, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke, and increases hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding when used in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.     

Fasting Levels of High-Sensitivity Growth Hormone Predict Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality : The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study

Background

Both pathological excess and deficiency of growth hormone (GH) are associated with cardiovascular mortality.

Objectives

The goal of this study was to test whether fasting levels of growth hormone measured with a high-sensitivity assay (hs-GH) predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality at the population level.

Methods

We studied 4,323 participants (age 46 to 68 years; mean age 58 years; 59% women) of the Swedish, population-based Malmö Diet and Cancer study examined in 1991 to 1994. Using multivariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, we related baseline levels of fasting hs-GH to incidence of coronary artery disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality.

Results

During a median follow-up of 16.2 years, hs-GH (hazard ratio [HR]/SD increment of natural logarithm of fasting hs-GH) was independently associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease (397 events; HR: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.23; p = 0.04), stroke (251 events; HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.34; p = 0.01), congestive heart failure (107 events; HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.52; p = 0.02), all-cause mortality (645 events; HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.26; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (186 events; HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.66; p < 0.001). The addition of hs-GH to a model with conventional cardiovascular risk factors significantly reclassified risk, with a category-free net reclassification improvement (>0) of 0.542 (95% CI: 0.205 to 0.840) in cardiovascular mortality.

Conclusions

Higher values of hs-GH were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.