The stability of facial osteotomies. 4. Maxillary and mandibular (with or without chin) advancement with rigid internal fixation

The short-term (6 weeks postoperative) and long-term (12 months postoperative) horizontal skeletal stability of combined maxillary and mandibular advancement was evaluated by cephalometric analysis of 15 patients.
The mean horizontal advancement of the maxilla was 5.84 mm. Six weeks later a mean horizontal relapse of 0.03 mm (0.05%) was identified. The mean horizontal relapse at long-term follow-up was 0.59 mm (10.1%).
The mean horizontal advancement of the mandible was 12.35 mm at menton and 12.65 mm at pogonion. At 6 weeks, mean horizontal relapse, respectively at the above landmarks, was 0.11 mm and 0.21 mm (1.3%). The mean horizontal relapse at long-term follow-up was 2.19 mm and 1.98 mm (16.6%) respectively for the same landmarks.
Subjectively and objectively, improvements were seen in facial aesthetics and dental occlusion. The results indicate that rigid fixation of osteotomies undertaken to correct 'horizontal facial deficiency' is a surgically predictable and relatively stable procedure when reviewed up to 12 months after surgery.     

The stability of facial osteotomies. Part 5. Maxillary advancement with miniplate and screw fixation

Surgical repositioning of the dento-skeletal components of the middle-third of the face, combined with appropriate orthodontic treatment, can be used to improve function and aesthetics. However, the attainment of three-dimensional stability following corrective jaw surgery continues to be a major problem in the postsurgical period.
This paper examines the short-term (six weeks postoperative) and long-term (12 months postoperative) horizontal skeletal stability of Le Fort I maxillary advancement in 15 patients. The mean horizontal advancement of the maxilla was 8.76 ± 0.99 mm. Six weeks later, a mean relapse of 0.22 ± 0.19 mm was identified. The mean relapse at long-term follow-up was 0.61 ± 0.26 mm (6.96%).
These results indicate that rigid miniplate and screw fixation of Le Fort I osteotomy undertaken to correct horizontal mid-dentofacial deficiency is both statistically and surgically predictable and stable when reviewed up to twelve months after surgery.     

Stability after rigid fixation of simultaneous maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement osteotomies

The purpose of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term stability of bimaxillary surgery following LeFort I (LF-1) impaction with simultaneous bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) and mandibular advancement using the technique of rigid internal fixation (RIF). In order to assess the postoperative maxillary and mandibular movement pattern in 26 patients with vertical maxillary excess and mandibular deficiency, cephalograms were taken immediately preoperatively, and 1 week, 2 months, and 1 year after surgery. With paired t-test showing no statistically significant postoperative change for the point A of the maxilla from immediate postsurgery to longest follow-up (P> 0.05), the used technique of "RIF LF-I impaction and RIF BSSO advancement" tended to render excellent postsurgical stability in the horizontal (0.1+/-0.8mm mean posterior movement) and vertical (0.1+/-0.5mm mean inferior movement) direction. There was no instance of maxillary relapse of >2mm. Regarding mandibular BSSO advancement, the point B showed a significant vertical upward movement (1.6+/-1.2mm) (P< 0.001) and a slight horizontal forward movement (0.3+/-2.0mm) (P> 0.05) at 1-year follow-up. The incidence of posterior relapse of >2mm accounted for 11.5%. The data confirm the concept that the bimaxillary approach of "LF-I impaction and BSSO advancement" using the described technique of RIF is a stable procedure in the treatment of open bite patients classified as vertical maxillary excess in combination with mandibular deficiency.     

Stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone: a case series.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the late postsurgical stability of the Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior internal fixation alone and no posterior zygomaticomaxillary buttress internal fixation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with maxillary vertical hyperplasia and mandibular retrognathia underwent a 1-piece Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla with superior repositioning and advancement or setback. A bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement was also performed in 22 patients. Stabilization of each maxillary osteotomy was achieved using transosseous stainless steel wires and/or 3-hole titanium miniplates in the piriform aperture region bilaterally, with no zygomaticomaxillary buttress internal fixation. (Twelve of the 60 identified patients were available for a late postoperative radiographic evaluation.) Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken preoperatively (T1), early postoperatively (T2), and late postoperatively (T3) to analyze skeletal movement. RESULTS: These 12 patients (5 male, 7 female) had a mean age of 24.5 years at surgery. Mean time from surgery to T2 was 41.2 days; mean time from surgery to T3 was 14.8 months. One patient received anterior wire osteosynthesis fixation, while 11 patients received both anterior titanium miniplate internal skeletal fixation and anterior wire osteosynthesis fixation. Six patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with genioplasty, 1 patient underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy, and 5 patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and genioplasty. These 12 patients all underwent maxillary superior repositioning with either advancement (11 patients) or setback (1 patient). Statistically significant surgical (T2-T1) changes were found in all variables measured. In late postsurgical measurements (T3-T2), all landmarks in the horizontal and vertical plane showed statistically significant skeletal stability. CONCLUSION: This case series suggests that anterior internal fixation alone in cases of 1-piece Le Fort I maxillary superior repositioning with advancement has good late postoperative skeletal stability.     

Long-term hard and soft tissue relapse rate after genioplasty

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess hard and soft tissue stability 12 months after advancement genioplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 20 patients who underwent either advancement genioplasty alone (n = 11) or in combination with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement (n = 9). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were traced and immediate postoperative changes and 12-month postoperative changes were defined. The relapse rate for the pogonion, the soft tissue pogonion, and the soft tissue B point (Bs) were evaluated. The results were compared for combined mandibular advancement plus genioplasty versus genioplasty alone. Relapse rates were also correlated with the amount of advancement. All patients were treated with rigid internal fixation. RESULTS: After 12 months, the pogonion, the soft tissue pogonion, and the soft tissue B point had a mean relapse rate of -0.38 mm, -1.2 mm, and -1.5 mm (negative value indicates a relapse, and a positive value indicates prolapse), respectively, which was not significant at probability values of.45,.069, and.054, respectively. Relapse was not statistically related to the amount of advancement. There was no significant difference between the relapse rate for genioplasty alone versus combined bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty, even with different amounts of advancement. CONCLUSIONS: Advancement genioplasty is an important and reliable technique for the esthetic treatment of the lower facial skeleton. The results indicate that there is no significant relapse after genioplasty and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or genioplasty alone after 12 months when rigid internal fixation is used. The changes were minimal and hard to detect clinically. Genioplasty, with or without mandibular advancement, is a stable surgical procedure when used in conjunction with rigid internal fixation.     

Resorbable PLLA-PGA screw fixation of mandibular sagittal split osteotomies.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraoperative placement and clinical effectiveness of resorbable copolymeric screws for mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomies. Thirty-seven patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomies of the mandible were fixated with three 2.5-mm copolymeric poly-L-lactic-polyglycolic (PLLA-PGA) screws on each side. No postoperative maxillomandibular fixation was applied. Twenty-five patients experienced mandibular advancement and 12 patients had setbacks. The average advancement was 6.5 mm (range, 3-17 mm) and the average set-back was 5.2 mm (range, 3-8 mm). Intraoperative placement was uncomplicated and no screws were stripped during placement. No problems in immediate postoperative stability were encountered and relapse was not evident in any patient. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 17 months. The screw holes remained evident radiographically after 1 year. Two and one-half-millimeter copolymeric PLLA-PGA resorbable screws for mandibular ramus osteotomies appear to offer clinical results comparable with metallic screw fixation.     

Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures were performed in 40 consecutive patients. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy stabilized with wire osteosynthesis for mandibular setback and low-level Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plates and screws for maxillary advancement were performed. Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was in place for 6 weeks. Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately postoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to vertical maxillary movement at surgery: a maxilla-up group with upward movement of the posterior nasal spine of 2 mm or more (group 1, n = 22), and a minimal vertical change group with less than 2 mm of vertical repositioning (group 2, n = 18). The results indicate that surgical correction of Class III malocclusion with combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies appears to be fairly stable. One year postsurgery, maxillary stability was excellent, with a mean horizontal relapse at point A that represented 10.7% of maxillary advancement in group 1 and 13.4% in group 2. In the vertical plane, maxillary stability was also excellent, with a mean of 0.18 mm of superior repositioning at point A for group 1 and 1.19 mm for group 2. The mandible relapsed a mean of 2.97 mm horizontally at pogonion in group 1 (62% of mandibular setback) and 3.41 mm (49.7% of setback) in group 2. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and MMF was not as stable as maxillary advancement and accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse (almost 85%) observed. A trend to relapse was observed for maxillary advancement greater than 6 mm, while the single variable accounting for mandibular relapse in group 1 was the amount of surgical setback. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery was not correlated with mandibular relapse in relation to the type of fixation performed and therefore does not seem to be responsible for relapse.     

Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement and rigid fixation

Twenty non-growing subjects underwent sagittal ramus osteotomies and rigid fixation. Cephalograms were analyzed before surgery, immediately after surgery and at least six months following surgery to evaluate skeletal stability. A mean horizontal relapse of 0.42 mm (8%) and a mean vertical increase in lower face height of 0.2 mm were found six months after surgery. Both were statistically insignificant. The mean backward rotation of the mandible of 0.55 degrees found six months after surgery was statistically significant (P less than 0.015), but was considered to be clinically insignificant. The results of this study show that surgical mandibular advancement with rigid fixation is a very reliable and stable procedure.     

Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal stability after double-jaw surgery for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion to assess whether there were any differences between wire and rigid fixation of the mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven Class III patients had Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plate and screws for maxillary advancement. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback was stabilized with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation for 6 weeks in 20 patients (group 1) and with rigid internal fixation in 17 patients (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately after surgery, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. One year after surgery, maxillary sagittal stability was excellent in both groups, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse observed. In group 1, significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse at the posterior maxilla and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. In group 2, significant correlations were found between mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the ramus and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. No significant differences in postoperative skeletal and dental stability between groups were observed except for maxillary posterior vertical position. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures appears to be a fairly stable procedure independent of the type of fixation used to stabilize the mandible.     

Stability of the hard and soft tissue profile after mandibular advancement in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study

The aim of the study was to conduct a long-term follow-up investigation of the stability of hard and soft tissues after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with rigid internal (RIF) fixation to advance the mandible. Sixteen consecutive patients (12 females and 4 males, mean age 21.4 years) were available for re-examination 12.7 years (T5) after surgery. The preceding follow-ups were before (T1), and 5 days (T2), 7.3 months (T3), and 13.9 months (T4) after surgery. Lateral cephalograms were traced by hand, digitized, and evaluated with the Dentofacial Planner program. The x-axis for the system of co-ordinates ran through sella (point zero) and the line NSL -7 degrees. Thus, the program determined the x- and y-values of each variable and the usual angles and distances. Statistical analysis was carried out using Wilcoxon's matched-pair signed-ranks test with Bonferroni adjustments. The relationships between the examined variables were analysed by Spearman rank correlation coefficients. The backward relapse at point B (T5) was 2.42 mm, or 50 per cent, and at pogonion 3.21 mm, or 60 per cent of the initial advancement. The mean net effect at T5 on the labial fold (soft tissue point B) was 94 per cent of the advancement at point B. For the soft tissue chin (soft tissue pogonion), it was 119 per cent of the advancement at pogonion. The net effect on the lower lip (labrale inferior) was 55 per cent of the advancement at incision inferior. The amount of the surgical advancement of the mandible was correlated with the long-term relapse in point B. Among possible reasons for this relapse are the initial soft tissue profile, the initial growth direction, and the remodelling processes of the hard tissue.     

Postoperative stability of conventional bimaxillary surgery compared with maxillary impaction surgery with mandibular autorotation for patients with skeletal class II retrognathia

We aimed to compare the postoperative stability of conventional bimaxillary surgery (with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy) with that of maxillary impaction surgery (with mandibular autorotation without bilateral sagittal split osteotomy) in patients with skeletal class II retrognathia. Patients were assigned to have conventional bimaxillary surgery (conventional group, n = 6) or mandibular autorotation (experimental group, n = 7). Measurements were made using serial lateral cephalometric radiographs taken immediately preoperatively (T0), immediately postoperatively (T1), and one year later (T2) to assess the variation in operative change (T1-T0) and relapse (T2-T1). There was no significant difference in median (range) surgical change in the anterior movement at point B (conventional group, 4.5 (3.0–11.0) mm; experimental group 4.1 (2.1–6.4) mm). However, there was a significant difference in median (range) surgical posterior movement relapse at point B (conventional group −1.7 (−2.3 to −0.5) mm; experimental group −0.6 (−1.0 to 1.0) mm; p = 0.032). Mandibular advancement with mandibular autorotation is therefore a more stable procedure than mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in patients with skeletal class II retrognathia.     

Skeletal stability following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with and without condylar positioning device.

PURPOSE: The goal of this retrospective study was to investigate whether utilization of condylar positioning devices in comparison to the manual positioning technique has a favorable influence on skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalometric radiographs of 49 patients who had undergone bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or bimaxillary surgery at the Universitiy Hospital of Aachen between 1993 and 2003 were evaluated with the aid of analysis software (Adda Keph version 3.0, JR - datentechnik, Leipzig, Germany). As a criterion for skeletal stability the postoperative changes of SNB angle and Wits appraisal were determined. In 10 of 28 patients with mandibular advancement and in 10 of 21 individuals with mandibular setback, the Luhr positioning device was used intraoperatively to reproduce the condylar position. Mandibular joints of the remaining patients were positioned manually. The results were statistically worked up by means of unrelated t test at P = .05. RESULTS: Neither in advancement nor in setback surgery did the positioning device technique result in better outcomes for postoperative changes of SNB angle and Wits appraisal. The confidence intervals rather suggest equivalence of the data in both groups. CONCLUSION: The use of positioning appliances does not lead to an improvement of skeletal stability. With the manual technique, equally stable results can be attained in advancement as well as in setback surgery.     

Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.

The objective of this cephalometric study was to compare skeletal stability and the time course of postoperative changes in high-angle and low-angle Class II patients after mandibular advancement surgery. The subjects were 61 consecutive mandibular retrognathism patients whose treatment included bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and rigid fixation. The patients were divided according to the preoperative mandibular plane angle; the 20 patients with the lowest mandibular plane angle (20.8 degrees +/- 4.9 degrees ) constituted the low-angle group, while the 20 cases with the highest mandibular plane angle (43.0 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees ) represented the high-angle group. Lateral cephalograms were taken on 6 occasions: immediately before surgery, immediately after surgery, 2 and 6 months after surgery, and 1 and 3 years after surgery. Results demonstrated that the high-angle and low-angle groups had different patterns of surgical and postoperative changes. High-angle patients were associated with both a higher frequency and a greater magnitude of horizontal relapse. While 95% of the total relapse took place during the first 2 months after surgery in the low-angle group, high-angle patients demonstrated a more continuous relapse pattern, with a significant proportion (38%) occurring late in the follow-up period. Possible reasons for the different postsurgical response are discussed.     

Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis

The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative stability of the mandible after a bilateral lengthening procedure, either by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) or distraction osteogenesis (DOG). All patients who underwent mandibular advancement surgery between March 2001 and June 2004 were evaluated; 26 patients in the BSSO group and 27 patients in the DOG group were included. The decision to use the intraoral distraction or BSSO for mandibular advancement primarily depended on the patient's choice. In both groups, standardized cephalometric radiographs were taken preoperatively, postoperatively (BSSO group) or directly post-distraction (DOG group) and during the last study measurement in May 2005. The cephalometric analysis was performed using the following measurements: Sella/Nasion-Mandibular point B and Sella/Nasion-Mandibular Plane. Point B was used to estimate relapse. This study showed no significant difference in relapse between the BSSO and the DOG group measured 10-49 months after advancement of the mandible (p>0.05). There is no postoperative difference in the stability between BSSO and DOG after mandibular advancement after 1 year.     

Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis

The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative stability of the mandible after a bilateral lengthening procedure, either by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) or distraction osteogenesis (DO). All patients who underwent mandibular advancement surgery between March 2001 and June 2004 were evaluated. There were 17 patients in the BSSO group and 18 patients in the DO group. The decision to use intra-oral distraction or BSSO for mandibular advancement primarily depended on the choice of the patient and their parents. In both groups, standardized cephalometric radiographs were taken preoperatively, postoperatively (BSSO group) or directly post-distraction (DO group) and during the last study measurement in May 2008. Cephalometric analysis was performed using the following measurements: sella/nasion-mandibular point B and sella/nasion-mandibular plane. Point B was used to estimate relapse. This study showed no significant difference in relapse between the BSSO and the DO groups measured 46-95 months after advancement of the mandible (P>.05). It can be concluded from this study that there is no postoperative difference in the stability between BSSO and DO after mandibular advancement after 4 years.     

Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery: a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients

The objective of this cephalometric study was to evaluate skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes in 80 consecutive mandibular prognathism patients operated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) and rigid fixation. Lateral cephalograms were taken on 6 occasions: immediately preoperative, immediately postoperative, 2 and 6 months postoperative, and 1 and 3 years postoperative. The results indicate that BSSO with rigid fixation for mandibular setback is a fairly stable clinical procedure. Three years after surgery, mean relapse at pogonion represented 26% of the surgical setback (19% at point B). Most of the relapse (72%) took place during the first 6 months after surgery. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery with lengthening of the elevator muscles, though evident in this study and apparently responsible for the early horizontal postoperative changes, does not seem to be associated with marked relapse. Changes occurring in some of the younger patients between 1 and 3 years postoperatively are likely to be manifestations of late mandibular growth.     

Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the amount of setback movement and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segments on postoperative stability after orthognathic surgery to correct mandibular prognathism.Thirty-six patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent orthognathic surgery with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy were evaluated. The amount of postoperative relapse was analyzed using a cephalometric analysis.Six months after surgery, the mean backward movement of the mandible at point B was 11.2 mm, the mean intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment was 4.3° and the amount of postoperative relapse at point B was 2.3 mm (20.3%) on average. The tendency of relapse did not significantly increase with the amount of setback but did increase significantly with the intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.This study suggested that postoperative relapse after mandibular setback surgery might be more related to the degree of the intraoperative clockwise movement of the proximal segment, rather than the amount of setback movement. When the amount of mandibular setback is considerable, postoperative relapse might be minimized with adequate control of the intraoperative positioning of the proximal segments.     

Surgical orthodontic correction of mandibular deficiency by sagittal osteotomy: Clinical and cephalometric analysis of 1-year data

A homogeneous sample of 76 mandibular retrognathic patients (mean age, 28 years) were examined for postoperative alterations after surgical treatment by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and mandibular advancement with wire fixation. Skeletal and dental measures were obtained from preoperative, immediate postoperative, fixation-release, and 1-year cephalograms. Spearman correlation was used as a preliminary analysis to assess the relationship between postsurgical change and age, genioplasty, amount of mandibular advancement, and preoperative mandibular plane angle. Genioplasty and amount of mandibular advancement were included as independent factors in the subsequent repeated-measures analysis of variance, since these were the only two factors that showed a consistent trend of correlations with postoperative change. Genioplasty was a significant factor in the X and Y coordinate changes in pogonion, while the amount of mandibular advancement was a significant factor in the X coordinate movements of all mandibular landmarks except gonion and condylion. The mean amount of horizontal advancement was 5.2 mm, and anterior face height increased 5.1 mm. During fixation, B point moved posteriorly (x = -1.6 mm, p less than 0.01) and inferiorly (y = 1.0 mm, p less than 0.01). After fixation release, these trends were reversed, resulting in a nonsignificant net horizontal change (x = -0.5 mm, p = 0.10) and a significant net superior movement (y = -1.3 mm, p = 0.01) by 1 year. Pogonion, menton, and mandibular incisor tip showed similar patterns.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term stability of surgical class III treatment: a study of 5-year postsurgical results

Previous studies have documented the stability of Class III surgical procedures in the first postsurgical year and during a postsurgical period > 2 years. To evaluate long-term changes, postoperative cephalometric radiographs at 1 year and > or = 5 years were digitized for 79 patients who had received either a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback, a Le Fort I maxillary advancement, or a combination of the 2 procedures. From 1 year to longest follow-up, the mean changes were quite small. Eighty-five percent of the maxillary advancement group and the mandibular setback group and 80% of the bimaxillary surgery group showed less than 4 mm of postsurgical change from 1 year to > or = 5 years. Long-term, the mandibular setback alone was more stable than when combined with maxillary surgery. This is opposite of what was observed during the first postsurgical year. Bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients improved the stability of the mandibular setback short-term and the maxillary advancement in the short and long term if the maxilla was also moved down during surgery. This study also suggests that bimaxillary surgery in Class III patients is more stable than bimaxillary surgery in Class II patients. On questionnaires that evaluated patient perception, 92% of patients reported satisfaction with healing since surgery. Eighty-nine percent thought their experience was positive and were happy with the surgical results. The predominant problems were altered feelings in the face or mouth (68%) and surprise at the length of their recovery (41%).     

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term results.

PURPOSE: To identify the long-term maxillomandibular changes after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism using bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent BSSO to setback the mandible and had cephalometric radiographs taken preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 1 year, and long-term follow-up (mean, 28 months). The cephalograms were traced and measured to determine the operative and postoperative changes. Correlation analyses were performed to see the relationship between the magnitude of setback and the amount of long-term postsurgical change at B point and pogonion. RESULTS: The mean surgical setback was 8.2 mm at B point and 8.8 mm at pogonion. The mean long-term horizontal relapse was 2.3 mm (28.0%) at B point and 3.0 mm (34.1%) at pogonion. Out of 20 patients, 12 (60.0%) relapsed horizontally greater than 2 mm at B point and 13 (65.0%) at pogonion. The mean vertical surgical changes showed downward displacement of B point (2.3 mm) and pogonion (2.0 mm). The mean long-term vertical relapse was 1.6 mm (69.6%) at B point and 1.7 mm (85.0%) at pogonion. CONCLUSION: There was no correlation between the magnitude of setback and the amount of relapse at B point and pogonion. However, there was significant correlation between the magnitude of vertical, downward surgical displacement and the amount of vertical relapse at B point and pogonion. The majority of the maxillofacial changes occurred within 1 year postoperatively.