GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI: New trial and registry data

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with adjunctive glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor therapy administered in the cardiac catheterization laboratory is the optimal reperfusion strategy for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Most available data regarding these agents are from trials comparing abciximab to placebo alone. Noninferiority trials comparing small-molecule GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, such as tirofiban and eptifibatide with abciximab, have used markers for myocardial reperfusion as primary end points but are underpowered to detect significant differences in hard clinical outcomes. Such a trial would need to enroll a very large number of patients and thus make it practically impossible to perform. Registry data reveal that most patients undergoing primary PCI are treated with small-molecule GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors in clinical practice, and no observed difference is observed in safety and efficacy when compared with patients treated with abciximab therapy.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use during percutaneous coronary intervention: IIb or Not IIb,what is the question?

Over the past decade, numerous placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials have documented robust clinical benefits of intravenous platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This evidence has led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and indication for use of two GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors at the time of PCI, namely, the chimeric monoclonal antibody fragment abciximab (ReoPro, Centocor, Inc. and Eli Lilly & Company) and the cyclic heptapeptide small molecule eptifibatide (Integrilin, COR Therapeutics and Key Pharmaceuticals). Currently, another small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, tirofiban (Aggrastat, Merck & Company), which (similar to eptifibatide) is approved for the medical therapy of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has not received indication for use in the PCI setting. Although the clinical benefits of both abciximab and eptifibatide administered at the time of PCI have been proven in randomized clinical trials, only abciximab has demonstrated a late survival advantage in patients following PCI. Evidence in support of the presence, magnitude and possible mechanisms for abciximab survival advantage is herein reviewed.     

Safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in urgent or emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Approximately 2% to 4% of patients undergo urgent or emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after treatment with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors play a large role in determining the safety of their use in the setting of urgent or emergency CABG procedures. Emergency or urgent CABG after treatment with the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, abciximab, may be associated with increased risk of hemorrhage and the requirement of platelet transfusions if surgery is performed within 12 h of abciximab discontinuation. Eptifibatide is associated with a similar risk compared with placebo, even when surgery is performed within 2 h of eptifibatide cessation. Limited data for tirofiban show that bleeding is not increased when compared with acetylsalicylic acid or heparin. Eptifibatide and tirofiban appear to have favourable safety profiles compared with abciximab in the setting of emergency or urgent CABG after failed PCI.     

Use of ICHOR-platelet works to assess platelet function in patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Platelet glycoprotein GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been recently approved for use in treating patients with acute coronary syndromes and those undergoing PCI. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a new device, the ICHOR platelet works, to detect platelet inhibition in patients undergoing PCI and treated with abciximab or tirofiban. The study was conducted at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Thirty patients undergoing PCI and treated with abciximab (n = 10) or tirofiban (n = 20) are included. Blood samples were obtained before, at 30 min, at 4 hr, and at 12 hr after starting the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and 2 hr after discontinuation. Baseline studies revealed > 95% platelet aggregability in all patients after exposure to ADP (20 microM). After starting tirofiban, 82%, 83%, and 82% of platelets were inhibited at 30 min, 4 hr, and 12 hr. Platelet inhibition decreased to 43% 2 hr after discontinuation of tirofiban. Similarly, ICHOR platelet works detected 91%, 92%, and 85% platelet inhibition at 30 min, 4 hr, and 12 hr after starting abciximab, respectively. Platelet inhibition decreased to 73% 2 hr after discontinuation. The ICHOR platelet works is a promising, simple, and rapid bedside method that may have clinical utility in assessing platelet inhibition in patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:346-351.     

Combining enoxaparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: final results of the National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin-3 (NICE-3) study

Background

In high-risk patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), there have been concerns relating to the safety of using low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in combination with a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist, and the continued use of LMWH in patients brought to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

The National Investigators Collaborating on Enoxaparin-3 (NICE-3) study was an open-label observational study of enoxaparin in combination with any 1 of 3 available GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients presenting with non-ST-elevation ACS. The primary end point was the incidence of major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Data were also recorded on the incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and urgent revascularization for repeat ischemia.

Results

A total of 671 patients with validated data were treated with enoxaparin; 628 of these patients also received a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist (tirofiban, n = 229; eptifibatide, n = 272; abciximab, n = 127); 283 of 628 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The 30-day incidence of non-CABG major bleeding was 1.9%, and was not significantly higher than a prespecified historical control rate of 2.0%. Outcome events included death (1.0% at hospital discharge and 1.6% at 30 days), MI (3.5% and 5.1%, respectively), and urgent revascularization (2.7% and 6.8%, respectively).

Conclusions

The safety of enoxaparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist was comparable to that of unfractionated heparin plus a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist, as reported in other recent major trials. Patients undergoing PCI can be safely managed with enoxaparin and a GP IIb/IIIa antagonist, without supplemental use of unfractionated heparin.     

Profound thrombocytopenia associated with tirofiban: case report and review of literature

Platelet glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa inhibitors prevent fibrinogen binding and platelet aggregation. Inhibition of platelet activity at the injured coronary plaque is a target for novel therapeutic strategies. They decrease ischemic complications associated with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. Thrombocytopenia is a serious complication well described with the use of the prototype GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab. Its association with other agents of this class has been underemphasized. It is important to monitor platelet counts closely after initiation of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, not only for abciximab, but also for small molecule inhibitors such as eptifibatide and tirofiban. Monitoring of platelet counts at 2 to 6 hours and 24 hours will detect most cases of acute thrombocytopenia. Adverse events may be prevented by prompt discontinuation of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy. The authors present a case of profound thrombocytopenia after the administration of tirofiban in the treatment of a patient with an acute coronary syndrome.     

Update on Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade in Endovascular Interventions

Platelet aggregation plays a central role in the ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and the acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although aspirin and heparin have been effective at decreasing adverse events in these settings, the perceived need for more potent inhibition of platelet aggregation has led to targeting of the platelet surface membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor. Several agents have been developed; four: abciximab, tirofiban, eptifibatide, and lamifiban have been tested in clinical trials. Overall, the positive findings of these studies have supported the hypothesis that enhanced platelet blockade leads to improved clinical outcomes in the settings of PCI and ACS. In this article, an overview of the various GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors is presented. The clinical trials of these agents as adjunctive therapy for patients undergoing PCI and in treatment of acute myocardial infarction are reviewed. Practical considerations relating to clinical efficacy, drug safety, and economic issues are discussed.     

Effect of abciximab versus tirofiban on activated clotting time during percutaneous intervention and its relation to clinical outcomes--observations from the TARGET trial

Previous evidence suggests that the monoclonal antibody abciximab may have a more potent anticoagulant effect than small-molecule glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors. We prospectively reviewed collected heparin dose, activated clotting time (ACT), and corresponding clinical outcome data from The Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial (TARGET), a direct comparison of tirofiban versus abciximab in patients who underwent percutaneous intervention. Of the 4,809 patients enrolled in the trial, 3,739 patients (78%) had an ACT measured after the administration of GP IIb/IIIa and heparin (peak procedural ACT); this formed the population for the present study. Mean total heparin dose was 75 +/- 32 and 76 +/- 31 U/kg in the tirofiban and abciximab groups, respectively. The resultant mean peak ACTs were 296 +/- 91 and 299 +/- 89 seconds (p = 0.09). In a subset of patients with both baseline ACT (before any heparin or GP IIb/IIIa therapy) and peak procedural ACT measurements, the difference in ACT between these time points was 80 +/- 97 vs 82 +/- 101 seconds (p = 0.44) for the tirofiban and abciximab groups, respectively. After adjusting for patients' weight, weight-adjusted heparin dose, and method of ACT measurement in a multiple linear regression analysis, the type of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was not predictive of the peak ACT (p = 0.24). When stratified by ACT quartile, no statistically significant difference in bleeding or ischemic end points between the tirofiban and abciximab cohorts was observed. In this large contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention trial, there was no observed difference in the anticoagulant effect of tirofiban and abciximab, as measured by the ACT, or in the incidence of bleeding or ischemic complications in each ACT quartile.     

The role of risk stratification in the decision to provide upstream versus selective glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We endeavored to determine under what conditions a strategy of upstream use of small molecule platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors for all acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients is cost effective compared to that of selective use of abciximab in only those patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown benefit in ACS, but abciximab, the more expensive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, may be more effective during PCI. However, abciximab does not have proven efficacy in medical management. No prior study has attempted to balance these competing benefits. METHODS: A decision analysis was performed to examine two strategies: 1) treat all ACS patients upstream with a small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and continue through medical management and PCI, if performed; or 2) wait, and selectively use abciximab only in patients who ultimately undergo PCI. Applicable randomized controlled trial data were used for the principal analysis. RESULTS: The strategy of upstream use of a small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor was superior to selective use, and economically acceptable, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 18,000 dollars per year of life gained. The superiority of the upstream use strategy persisted over the majority of sensitivity analyses. When stratified by risk according to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score, a strategy of upstream use was only cost effective in those patients with moderate or high risk. CONCLUSIONS: Upstream use of small molecule GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in ACS patients with moderate or high risk for cardiovascular events is a cost-effective approach that should be considered in this subset of patients.     

Short-Term Comparative Outcomes Associated with the Use of GP IIb/IIIa Antagonists in Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention

Background:Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists reduce the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and urgent revascularization among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite a similar mechanism of platelet inhibition, the three currently approved agents vary widely in cost. Purpose: The purpose of this prospectively designed, retrospective analysis was to determine clinical outcomes for patients receiving abciximab, tirofiban or eptifibatide as adjunctive therapy during PCI at a single center. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes during hospitalization following PCI in patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide compared with those patients who received abciximab. Outcomes examined included in-hospital mortality, hemorrhagic procedural complications, need for recatheterization, peak creatine kinase following intervention and length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: Two hundred and sixty seven consecutive patients in whom GP IIb/IIIa antagonist therapy was initiated in the catheterization laboratory for PCI were analyzed. Abciximab-treated patients were more likely to be undergoing primary (p<0.001) and rescue (p=0.022) PCI and to have received fibrinolytic therapy (p=0.013) when compared to patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide. There were no significant differences between abciximab- and non abciximab-treated patients in either the primary PCI or non primary PCI groups in any of the studied endpoints. In patients undergoing primary PCI, abciximab-treated patients when compared with non abciximab-treated patients exhibited a trend toward an increase in hospital LOS (7.8±7.0 d vs 6.2±3.9, p=0.19) and in the frequency of hemmorhagic complications (22.1% vs 5.3%, p=0.11). In patients not receiving fibrinolytic therapy, abciximab-treated patients experienced a trend toward increased hemmorhagic complications following PCI when compared to non abciximab-treated patients (10.2% vs 6.0%, p=0.28). Complications distant from the vascular access site comprised 62.5% of hemmorhagic complications in the abciximab-treated group, but only 20% of the complications in the non-abciximab treated population (p<0.001). These data suggest no differences in acute outcomes between groups of patients receiving abciximab or other approved GP IIb/IIIa antagonists highlighting a potential significant cost saving. These data will require interpretation following the publication of comparative trials.     

An audit of the use and complications of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in percutaneous coronary intervention against national UK standards

Coronary thrombosis is a pivotal event in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes and ischemic complications resulting from coronary intervention. Activation of the platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor is the final common pathway leading to platelet aggregation, coronary thrombus formation, and myocardial ischemia. Inhibitors of platelet GP IIb/IIIa are potent agents to prevent progression to myocardial infarction and death.

We prospectively surveyed the indications, frequency, and complications associated with the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in percutaneous coronary intervention in a tertiary center setting.

A total of 170 patients underwent screening over a period of 6 weeks. One hundred four (61%) had coronary intervention, out of which eight (8%) had failed intervention. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 57 (55%) patients; 47 (45%) did not have any agent periprocedure. Eptifibatide was the most commonly used agent in 35 (33%), followed by abciximab in 19 (18%) and tirofiban in 3 (3%).

Out of 57 patients in whom GP IIb/IIIa agents were used, 22 (38%) had visible intracoronary thrombus, 22 (38%) had diffuse disease, 8 (14%) had complex intervention, and 5 (9%) had diabetes.

The overall incidence of complications was not increased by the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors; serious complications were rare with the use of GP IIb/IIIa agents; no stroke, thrombocytopenia, gastrointestinal bleed, or death was recorded. The overall use in emergency settings was not associated with increased complications. Bradycardia and vomiting were more common with abciximab group, whereas puncture site pain was commoner in eptifibatide group.     

Combination Enoxaparin and Abciximab During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A New Standard of Care?

Evidence from randomized trials supports the administration of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade both to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those presenting with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Similarly, the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin, has demonstrated superior efficacy when compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of patients with non-ST elevation ACS. Algorithms for seamless integration of pharmacotherpy through the course of hospitalization for patients who present with ACS and who require PCI will likely combine therapy with enoxaparin and platelet GP IIb/IIIa blockade (abciximab). Our preliminary experience with combination enoxaparin and abciximab as adjunctive pharmacotherapy for PCI suggests that this strategy is safe and effective and may offer advantages over a conventional strategy, which employs UFH.     

Comparative Pharmacology of GP IIb/IIIa Antagonists

GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are qualitatively different from classical antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin or clopidogrel. They do not inhibit platelet activation, i.e. intraplatelet signal generation or conduction but primarily act outside the platelet by competing with ligand (e.g. fibrinogen) binding that is essential for platelet bridging and aggregate formation. Three compounds are in clinical use: abciximab, an antibody fragment and two low-molecular weight compounds, tirofiban and eptifibatide. In comparison to the low-molecular weight compounds, abciximab has a substantially longer platelet half-life (4 h), i.e. slow off-rate and a short plasma half-life (20-30 min) without significant distribution into the extravascular space. The plasma half-life of tirofiban and eptifibatide is about 2 h and parallels the antiplatelet effect. The off-rate from the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor is much faster and there is a significant distribution into the extravascular space. These pharmacokinetic variables might influence the competition between the antagonists and fibrinogen for GP IIb/IIIa binding. Other pharmacological variables are a partial agonistic activity, facilitation of thrombolysis, modification of other integrin-related actions, including inflammatory responses, effects on vascular cells and apoptosis. Importantly, GP IIb/IIIa antagonists might also interfere with prothrombin binding to the platelet surface and, thus, might influence the coagulation pathway. There is no clear evidence that the biological activity of the agents is modified by gene polymorphism (HPA-1). All three compounds may cause thrombocytopenia, possibly related to drug-induced antibodies. There is no clear data suggesting that these pharmacological differences transfer into significant differences in clinical outcome, for example in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) subjected to acute percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The only head-to-head comparison of all three clinically used parenteral compounds did not demonstrate differences in major adverse cardiac effects (MACE) at 30 days although those have been described in particular with long-term use of oral antagonists. The inherent problems with all GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are the narrow therapeutic range because the same mechanisms are involved in hemostasis and thrombosis and their inability to inhibit platelet activation.     

Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors before primary angioplasty in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) are recommended by current guidelines. Thus, an increasing number of patients receive these drugs before coronary angiography, particularly if a between-hospital transfer is needed. However, when coronary anatomy is unsuitable for angioplasty, emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) under GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor treatment may be needed, with a potential increase in bleeding risk. Abciximab has a long duration of action, because of its high-affinity binding to GP IIb/IIIa receptors. Initial retrospective studies reported a higher incidence of major bleeding during emergency CABG after abciximab administration, leading to the recommendation of delaying surgery >12 h. However, data from the prospective trials on abciximab do not confirm the increase in bleeding risk, and current evidence shows that emergency surgery can be performed safely soon after abciximab cessation. Monitoring of activated clotting time during surgery and platelet transfusion in case of postoperative relevant bleeding are the only measures needed. No data are available on emergency surgery in patients with STEMI treated with eptifibatide or tirofiban. However, their short-lasting effects and the results of trials on non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes suggest that they could even reduce postoperative bleeding by preventing platelet consumption during cardiopulmonary bypass. In conclusion, the early administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, in particular of abciximab, in patients with STEMI in whom primary angioplasty is planned should not be discouraged because of the potential bleeding risk in case of emergency CABG.     

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and long-term benefit: the stuff of dreams?

This editorial refers to "Five-year outcome of patients withacute myocardial infarction enrolled in a randomised trial assessingthe value of abciximab during coronary artery stenting" by G.Ndrepepa et al. on page 1635 Over the years, several controversies have surrounded the choicesmade before and during the reperfusion process of acute ST-elevationmyocardial infarction (STEMI). Among many others, questionshave been raised over the value of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) versus thrombolysis, of stenting versus balloon angioplasty,of filters or thrombectomy devices versus no distal protection,and of course, of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors versusno GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Among the dozen of randomized trialsevaluating these drugs in primary PCI of evolving STEMI, onlyfive were big enough to look at clinical endpoints and wereperformed with abciximab.     

Differential Effects of Citrate Versus PPACK Anticoagulation on Measured Platelet Inhibition by Abciximab, Eptifibatide and Tirofiban

Background: High levels of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition are required to prevent arterial thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Ex-vivo turbidometric platelet aggregation in citrate anticoagulated blood samples has been the primary method previously utilized to derive dose regimens for administering platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Enhanced GP IIb/IIIa binding and inhibition of platelet aggregation for eptifibatide secondary to citrate induced reduction of ionized plasma calcium concentrations has been reported. Methods/Results: We evaluated the differential effects of citrate versus PPACK anticoagulation on turbidometric platelet inhibition in normal volunteers by eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. The decrease in ionized calcium afforded by citrate was associated with enhanced in vitro platelet inhibition for all three GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, including abciximab. The magnitude of citrate effect was greatest for eptifibatide. Both tirofiban and abciximab have similar citrate calcium chelation associated enhancement of measured platelet inhibition.Conclusion: Accurate assessment and comparison of platelet inhibition by GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors may require avoidance of calcium chelating anticoagulants.     

A Review of Clinical Trials with Eptifibatide in Cardiology

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists inhibit the binding of ligands to activated platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptors and, therefore, prevent the formation of platelet thrombi. Additional antithrombin therapy should be given in connection with GP IIb/IIIa administration. Eptifibatide is a small heptapeptide, which is highly selective and rapidly dissociates from its receptor after cessation of therapy. In clinical trials (IMPACT‐II and ESPRIT) concomitant administration of eptifibatide to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduced thrombotic complications. In the PURSUIT trial, in patients with non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndromes, eptifibatide, compared to placebo, significantly reduced the primary endpoint of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction at 30 days. In patients with STEMI eptifibatide has been studied as an adjunct to fibrinolysis and primary PCI; it improved epicardial flow and tissue reperfusion. Current studies are evaluating eptifibatide as upstream therapy in high‐risk patients with NSTE‐ACS, in the EARLY‐ACS and in comparison with abciximab in patients with primary PCI in the EVA‐AMI trial.     

Combination platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor and lepirudin administration during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

We evaluated a combination therapy using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonism and direct thrombin inhibition in nine patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) undergoing 10 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). In selected patients with HIT, the combination of a direct thrombin inhibitor, lepirudin, and abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide appears to be a safe and effective anticoagulation strategy for PCI.     

Administration of abciximab to patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide: effect on platelet function.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate platelet function and to preliminarily assess the clinical safety of sequential treatment with tirofiban or eptifibatide followed by abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: An increasing number of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are treated early with tirofiban or eptifibatide. Some later require PCI and may benefit from switching to abciximab, for which long-term benefits have been reported. METHODS: Fifty ACS patients planned for PCI were enrolled. Twenty-five patients received tirofiban followed by abciximab. Ten patients received eptifibatide followed by abciximab. Fifteen patients received only abciximab. All patients had blood samples drawn six times during the therapeutic course. Platelet function was evaluated by ADP- and TRAP-induced aggregation, flow cytometry analysis of fibrinogen binding and the cone and plate(let) analyzer, which tests shear rate-dependent platelet activation. RESULTS: Administered after tirofiban, abciximab caused a significant further decline in platelet function, as evidenced by all methods. Administered after eptifibatide, abciximab caused a significant further reduction in platelet function, as assessed by the cone and plate(let) analyzer and fibrinogen binding methods. The platelet inhibition achieved by the combination therapy was always greater than or equal to that achieved by abciximab alone. There were no major bleeding or severe thrombocytopenia episodes. Three of the 35 combination therapy patients and one of the 15 who received abciximab alone had minor bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first in vivo study of combination intravenous platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy. Administration of abciximab immediately after tirofiban or eptifibatide therapy effectively inhibits platelet function and appears to be safe.     

Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent of platelet aggregation inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), treated with different antiplatelet agents and dosages. BACKGROUND: The extent of platelet aggregation inhibition is an independent predictor of major cardiac events after elective PCI. In STEMI patients undergoing PCI, routine dose of antiplatelet agents may be associated with less effective platelet aggregation inhibition. METHODS: Patients were treated with clopidogrel before angiography and randomized to abciximab, tirofiban, high-dose tirofiban, or no glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor; GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor bolus, followed by maintenance infusion, was administered after angiography, but before PCI. Platelet aggregation inhibition was assessed before angiography, immediately after PCI, and 1 and 6 h afterwards. RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 112 patients. Platelet aggregation inhibition was variable for individuals and suboptimal for all agents, particularly in the periprocedural period. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. Angiographic parameters after PCI were not different between the groups. No relationship was found between the level of platelet aggregation and parameters of PCI success (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count and myocardial blush grade), after combining the data from all four groups studied. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet aggregation inhibition in STEMI patients undergoing PCI, treated with antiplatelet agents, is variable and suboptimal for all agents and dosages studied. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. However, no relationship of platelet aggregation inhibition and angiographic outcome was found in this patient cohort.