Xp11.2 translocation renal neoplasm with features of TFE3 rearrangement associated renal cell carcinoma and Xp11 translocation renal mesenchymal tumor with melanocytic differentiation harboring NONO-TFE3 fusion gene

Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and Xp11 translocation renal mesenchymal tumor are distinct tumor entity. To broaden the spectrum of Xp11 neoplasms, we investigated a novel tumor exhibiting morphologies overlapping Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 rearrangement-associated RCC and the mesenchymal counterpart with melanocytic differentiation by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and RNA sequencing, as well as literature review. Histologically, the tumor was composed of three different types of tumor cells, including a large proportion of clear cells, small round cells, and a few spindle cells, presenting a relatively clear border in the majority area. The nuclei of all tumor cells showed extensively and strong positive expressions of TFE3. Whereas, the clear cells positively expressed the RCC-related markers including PAX8, RCC marker and CD10, and negatively expressed HMB45; On the contrary, the small round cells and spindle cells positively expressed melanocytic marker HMB45, and negatively expressed PAX8, RCC marker and CD10. The ki67 index was higher in the small round cells and spindle cells than that in the clear cells. FISH revealed the rearrangement of TFE3 gene in all the three types of cells. The NONO-TFE3 fusion gene was detected in all tumor cells by RNA sequencing. This unique Xp11 translocation-associated neoplasm might represent a distinct entity overlapping Xp11 translocation RCC and the mesenchymal counterpart with melanocytic differentiation, broadening the spectrum of Xp11 neoplasms. The patient died of tumor recurrence and lung metastasis after seven months after the surgery suggesting those tumors have an unfavorable prognosis.     

Recent classification of renal epithelial tumors

The recent classification of renal tumors is based on genetic evidence as well as on histologic features. Malignant tumor includes clear cell renal carcinoma (RCC), multilocular cystic RCC, papillary RCC, chromophobe RCC, carcinoma of the collecting duct of Bellini, renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. Benign tumor is subdivided into papillary adenoma, renal oncocytoma and metanephric adenoma. Recently, new disease entities such as acquired cystic disease-associated RCC, clear cell papillary RCC and renal carcinoma with t(6;11)(p21:q12) have been discovered. In this article, we briefly review and introduce the clinical, morphological and genetic features of these tumor entities.     

青少年肾细胞癌的临床病理及分子遗传学研究

目的 探讨青少年肾细胞癌的临床病理特征、遗传学改变、鉴别诊断及预后.方法 对46例青少年肾细胞癌进行光镜观察及免疫组织化学染色,随访并复习相关文献.对46例肿瘤进行von Hippel-Lindau(VHL)基因区域杂合性缺失(LOH)及VHL基因突变筛查.结果 共诊断19例Xp11.2易位/TFE3基因融合相关性肾癌(Xp11 RCC)、9例透明细胞癌、17例乳头状肾细胞癌(PRCC)和1例不能分类肾细胞癌.19例Xp11 RCC均TFE3阳性,而TFEB阴性.8例肿瘤具有巢状和乳头状结构形态类似t(X;17)ASPL-TFE3型肾癌,6例肿瘤组织学类似t(X;1)PRCC-TFE3型肾癌,4例肿瘤形态像透明细胞癌,1例肿瘤组织学形态文献中未被检索到,表现为细胞核呈毛玻璃样,核仁不明显,可见核沟,肿瘤间质见大量黏液.LOH及VHL突变检测结果显示,仅1例透明细胞癌和1例2型PRCC存在LOH,并且该2型PRCC的VHL基因的一个剪切位点存在胚系突变,553+5 G→C.其余45例均未检测出VHL突变.统计学分析表明TFE3阳性肾细胞癌比TFE3阴性肾细胞癌更倾向于高病理分期(pT3/pT4),并且预后较差(P=0.035).结论 青少年肾细胞癌表现出不同的组织学形态以及分子遗传学背景.其中Xp11 RCC为最常见的肾癌亚型.TFE3阳性肾细胞癌的预后要差于TFE3阴性肾细胞癌.     

Fine‐needle aspiration findings of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma metastatic to a hilar lymph node

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a specific type of renal cell carcinoma recently placed under the “MiT family translocation RCC” at the last 2013 ISUP Vancouver classification of renal neoplasia. This tumor contains variable proportions of clear cells and could easily mimic papillary RCC, clear cell type, and clear cell papillary RCC. Given the small number of published cytologic findings of this tumor, it could easily present as a diagnostic pitfall. We describe a case of a 23‐year‐old man with a history of prior nephrectomy who presented with multiple mediastinal lymphadenopathies on imaging surveillance follow‐up. Fine‐needle aspiration of the lymph node showed tumor cells with voluminous clear to eosinophilic cytoplasm, well‐defined cell borders and hyperchromatic nuclei arranged in papillary architecture. Review of the prior nephrectomy specimen showed papillary cores surrounded by cells with voluminous clear to finely granular eosinophilic cytoplasm and distinct cell borders. Immunohistochemical stains performed on the nephrectomy specimen showed tumor positivity for CD10, E‐cadherin, a‐methylacyl coenzyme A racemase, and TFE3 supporting the diagnosis of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma. Although this tumor was initially described predominantly in children, it could also occur in adults, as seen in this case. Familiarity with the cytologic findings of this tumor, use of immunohistochemical stains, or cytogenetic test to determine the type of gene fusion will be extremely useful in arriving at the correct diagnosis. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:456–462. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Fine-needle aspiration of a Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 fusion renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the lung: report of a case and review of the literature

A 57-yr-old woman presented to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) with a history of nephrectomy for a clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), Fuhrman grade 3 of 4 diagnosed 1 yr prior to admission to the NCI. A CT scan done upon admission revealed multiple bilateral lung masses. A CT-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of one of the lung masses revealed a cellular specimen composed primarily of follicular structures surrounding dense hyalinized central cores. The cells in the follicular structures displayed bland nuclei and had granular to vacuolated cytoplasm. Papillary structures were also appreciated. Immunocytochemical studies showed tumor cells that were strongly vimentin and TFE3 positive. Focal staining for AE1/AE3 and CD10 was observed, as was negative staining for EMA. A surgical biopsy specimen reflected the FNA findings and demonstrated a similar immunoprofile. These findings correspond to the recently described Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 fusion renal cell carcinoma. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the cytologic features of an Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 fusion RCC.     

Recent advances of immunohistochemistry for diagnosis of renal tumors

The recent classification of renal tumors has been proposed according to genetic characteristics as well as morphological difference. In this review, we summarize the immunohistochemical characteristics of each entity of renal tumors. Regarding translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFE3, TFEB and ALK protein expression is crucial in establishing the diagnosis of Xp11.2 RCC, renal carcinoma with t(6;11)(p21;q12), and renal carcinoma with ALK rearrangement, respectively. In dialysis‐related RCC, neoplastic cells of acquired cystic disease‐associated RCC are positive for alpha‐methylacyl‐CoA racemase (AMACR), but negative for cytokeratin (CK) 7, whereas clear cell papillary RCC shows the inverse pattern. The diffuse positivity for carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) is diagnostic for clear cell RCC. Co‐expression of CK7 and CA9 is characteristic of multilocular cystic RCC. CK7 and AMACR are excellent markers for papillary RCC and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. CD82 and epithelial‐related antigen (MOC31) may be helpful in the distinction between chromophobe RCC and renal oncocytoma. WT1 and CD57 highlights the diagnosis of metanephric adenoma. The combined panel of PAX2 and PAX8 may be useful in the diagnosis of metastatic RCC.     

Pediatric renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in children and young adults is rare and pathologically problematic. RCC can be either hereditary or sporadic and has a guarded prognosis because appropriate management has not been established. A case of RCC in an 11-year-old is reported. The clinical presentation was a right abdominal mass, hematuria, urinary tract infection, and wasting. Radio-logically, the mass was found within the right kidney with calcification and paraaortic lymphadenopathy. The postsurgical diagnosis was Wilms' tumor stage T4N2M0. On gross inspection, the tumor was ill defined, extending across Gerota's fascia and into the ureter lumina. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of malignant epithelial cells with clear and eosinophilic cytoplasm in nested, papillary, and alveolar configuration. Hyaline nodules, psammoma bodies, vascular invasion, capsular invasion, and extension into the ureter were also found. Immunohistochemically, the cells showed strong nuclear immunoreactivity for TFE3. We concluded that this case was an RCC associated with Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 fusion, Fuhrman grade 3, stage IV.     

Altered expression of key cell cycle regulators in renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare tumor in the pediatric population. Recently, a phenotypically and genetically distinct kidney carcinoma, mainly prevalent in children and associated with an Xp11.2 translocation or TFE3 gene fusion, has been described. It has been advanced that in this subtype of RCC, there is an accumulation of cyclin D1, cyclin D3, and p21 ^(wafl/cip1). The aim of the present study was to figure out in two pediatric RCC recently diagnosed in our department (one clear cell-type RCC and one TFE3-positive RCC) whether those features are indeed specific of the latter tumor or occur in pediatric RCC irrespective of the tumor type. The following immunostains were performed in both cases: Ki67, p16^ink4a, p21 ^(wafl/cip1), p27^kip1, p53, p63, mdm2, cyclin D1, cyclin D3, TFE3, CD10, vimentin, E-cadherin, and RCC-antigen. We observed in the TFE3-positive carcinoma an intense immunoreaction for p21 ^(wafl/cip1), cyclin D1, and cyclin D3, without expression for p53, p16, p27^kip1, and mdm2, whereas the immunoexpression profile observed in the classic RCC was similar to that of clear cell, adult-type RCC.     

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney with prominent papillary component,a non-classic morphologic variant. A histologic,immunohistochemical, electron microscopic and fluorescence in situ hybridization study

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) is a rare type of kidney tumor with relatively indolent behavior. Non-classic morphological variants have not been well studied and rarely been reported. We report a challenging case MTSCC with a peculiar morphology in a 42-year-old man, arising in a background of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Predominant areas with extensive papillary architecture, psammoma bodies and stromal macrophageal aggregates, reminiscent of a papillary renal cell carcinoma (papillary RCC), were intermixed with foci that transitioned into a MTSCC-like morphology exhibiting elongated tubules and a low grade spindle cell component in a background of mucinous stroma. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated diffuse positivity for P504s/AMACR and vimentin in tumor cells. Focal positivity for RCC, CD10 and CK7 was also noted. Kidney-specific cadherin, cytokeratin 34betaE12 and TFE3 stains were negative in the tumor. The major differential diagnostic considerations were papillary RCC, clear cell papillary RCC, and Xp11.2 translocation carcinoma. Negative FISH studies for trisomy 7 and 17 in both papillary and spindled components supported the diagnosis of MTSCC. The ultrastructural profile was not entirely indicative of the cellular origin of the tumor. Cytogenetic analysis should be performed in atypical cases of MTSCC for precise diagnosis.     

Gene fusion analysis in renal cell carcinoma by FusionPlex RNA‐sequencing and correlations of molecular findings with clinicopathological features

Translocation renal cell carcinoma (tRCC) affects younger patients and often presents as advanced disease. Accurate diagnosis is required to guide clinical management. Here we evaluate the RNA‐sequencing FusionPlex platform with a 115‐gene panel including TFE3 and TFEB for tRCC diagnosis and correlate molecular findings with clinicopathological features. We reviewed 996 consecutive RCC cases from our institution over the preceding 7 years and retrieved 17 cases with histological and immunohistochemical features highly suggestive of either TFE3 (n = 16) or TFEB (n = 1). Moderate to strong labeling for TFE3 was present in 15 cases; two cases with weak TFE3 expression were melan‐A or cathepsin‐K positive. RNA‐sequencing detected gene rearrangements in eight cases: PRCC‐TFE3 (3), ASPSCR1‐TFE3 (2), LUC7L3‐TFE3 (1), SFPQ‐TFE3 (1), and a novel SETD1B‐TFE3 (1). FISH assays of 11 tumors verified six positive cases concordant with FusionPlex analysis results. Two other cases were confirmed by RT‐PCR. FusionPlex was superior to FISH by providing precise breakpoints for tRCC‐related genes in a single assay and allowing identification of both known and novel fusion partners, thereby facilitating clinicopathological correlations as fusion partners can influence tumor appearance, immunophenotype, and behavior. Cases with partner genes PRCC and novel partner SETD1B were associated with prominent papillary architecture while cases with partner genes ASPSCR1 and LUC7L3 were associated with a predominantly nested/alveolar pattern. The case with SFPQ‐TFE3 fusion was characterized by biphasic morphology mimicking TFEB‐like translocation RCC. We recommend FusionPlex analysis of RCC in patients under age 50 or when the histologic appearance suggests tRCC.     

Sclerosing TSC1 mutated renal cell carcinoma: An unusual pattern mimicking MITF family translocation renal cell carcinoma

The tuberous sclerosis genes and MTOR are increasingly being found to have important roles in novel subtypes of renal cancer, particularly emerging entities eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and high‐grade oncocytic renal tumor (HOT)/RCC with eosinophilic and vacuolated cytoplasm. We report a unique renal neoplasm in a 66‐year‐old woman that initially mimicked MITF family translocation RCC due to mixed clear and eosinophilic cells, extensive stromal hyalinization, and psammoma bodies, yet which was negative for TFE3 and TFEB fluorescence in situ hybridization and a next generation sequencing (NGS) gene fusion assay. Cytoplasmic stippling triggered consideration of TSC‐associated neoplasms, and a targeted NGS assay revealed a variant in exon 21 of TSC1 resulting in c.2626G>T p.(Glu876*) truncating mutation. This report adds to the morphologic spectrum of TSC‐related renal neoplasms, including prominent stromal hyalinization as a potentially deceptive pattern. Due to the overlap in cytoplasmic stippling between eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC and HOT/RCC with eosinophilic and vacuolated cytoplasm, it is debatable which category this example would best fit. Further understanding of these entities and other renal neoplasms with alterations in the TSC genes will elucidate whether they should be considered a family of tumors.     

A novel RBMX‐TFE3 gene fusion in a highly aggressive pediatric renal perivascular epithelioid cell tumor

We report an Xp11 translocation perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) with a novel RBMX‐TFE3 gene fusion, resulting from a paracentric X chromosome inversion, inv(X)(p11;q26). The neoplasm occurred in an otherwise healthy 12‐year‐old boy who presented with a large left renal mass with extension into the inferior vena cava. The patient was found to have multiple pulmonary metastases at diagnosis and died of disease 3 months later. The morphology (epithelioid clear cells with alveolar and nested architecture) and immunophenotype (TFE3 and HMB45 strongly positive; actin, desmin, and PAX8 negative) was typical of an Xp11 translocation PEComa; however, TFE3 rearrangement was initially not detected by routine TFE3 break‐apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Further RNA sequencing revealed a novel RBMX‐TFE3 gene fusion, which was subsequently confirmed by fusion assay FISH, using custom design RBMX and TFE3 come‐together probes. This report describes a novel TFE3 gene fusion partner, RBMX, in a pediatric renal PEComa patient associated with a fulminant clinical course. As documented in other intrachromosomal Xp11.2 inversions, such as fusions with NONO, RBM10, or GRIPAP1 genes, the TFE3 break‐apart might be below the FISH resolution, resulting in a false negative result.     

A renal cell carcinoma with EWSR1‐TFE3 fusion gene

Both EWSR1 and TFE3 are well‐known oncogenes. EWSR1 encodes an RNA‐binding protein involved in multiple soft tissue tumors, including Ewing's sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, soft tissue clear cell sarcoma (malignant melanoma of soft parts), extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, and myxoid liposarcomas. TFE3 regulates both Golgi and lysosomal homeostasis and is rearranged in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), alveolar soft part sarcoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, and perivascular epitheloid cell tumors (PEComas). In this report, we found a rare case of RCC with a fusion between 5′ EWSR1 and 3′ TFE3. The fusion product retained most functional motifs of TFE3. The oncogenic mechanism likely involves TFE3 overexpression through its juxtaposition with the regulatory elements of EWSR1 and its translocation to the nucleus, resulting in the deregulation of Golgi and lysosomal homeostasis. This is a second case of RCC containing EWSR1‐TFE3 fusion.