The Canadian health care system: A model for America to emulate?

The American health care system has the world's highest per capita costs and over 30 million citizens uninsured. The neighbouring Canadian system provides coverage for all basic medical and hospital services, at costs per capita that are about US$700 lower. Single-agency public funding allows tighter control of Canadian expenditures, and reduces administrative overheads. Hospitals are run as non-profit private corporations, funded primarily by a fixed annual allocation for operating costs. Most physicians are in private fee-for-service practice, but cannot charge more than the insured tariff negotiated between their provincial government and medical association. This approach, while attractive in its decentralization, tends to separate the funding and management of clinical services. Thus, hospital information systems lag a decade behind the USA, managed care initiatives are few, health maintenance organisations do not exist, and experimentation with alternative funding or delivery systems has been sporadic. Strengths of the system compared to the USA include: higher patient satisfaction, universal coverage, slightly better cost containment, higher hospital occupancy rates, and reduction in income-related rationing with more equitable distribution of services. Weaknesses in common with the United States are: cost escalation consistently outstripping the consumer price index with costs per capita second highest in the world, ever rising consumption of services per capita, inadequate manpower planning and physician maldistribution, poor regional co-ordination of services, inadequate quality assurance and provider frustration. Additional weaknesses include: an emerging funding crisis caused by the massive federal deficit, less innovation in management and delivery of care as compared to the USA, implicit rationing with long waiting lists for some services, and recurrent provider-government conflicts that have reduced goodwill among stakeholders. Thus, while the Canadian model has important advantages, it does not offer a panacea for American health care woes.     

International trade regulation and publicly funded health care in Canada.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) creates new challenges for the Canadian health care system, arguably one of the most "socialized" systems in the world today. In particular, the WTO's enhanced trade dispute resolution powers, enforceable with sanctions, may make Canadian health care vulnerable to corporate penetration, particularly in the pharmaceutical and private health services delivery sectors. The Free Trade Agreement and its extension, the North American Free Trade Agreement, gave multinational pharmaceutical companies greater freedom in Canada at the expense of the Canadian generic drug industry. Recent challenges by the WTO have continued this process, which will limit the health care system's ability to control drug costs. And pressure is growing, through WTO's General Agreement on Trade in Services and moves by the Alberta provincial government to privatize health care delivery, to open up the Canadian system to corporate penetration. New WTO agreements will bring increasing pressure to privatize Canada's public health care system and limit government's ability to control pharmaceutical costs.     

Community and long-term facility care in Canada

By 1969, federal/provincial agreements had resulted in universally-insured access to hospital and medical services for all Canadians. In the absence of similar agreements for community and long-term care, each province has designed, implemented, and modified its own policies and programs during the last three decades. However, the communal values and the universal access to hospital and medical services which underpinned the national health plan influenced these policies and programs. Over time, the provincial programs have become more similar to each other but significant differences remain. However, all the provincial programs combine the assessment and delivery of short- and long-term community care and almost all combine the assessment of need for community care with that for long-term facility care placement. This article examines the development and changes in the community care and long-term facility care sectors in Canada over the recent past. Despite financial constraints which have resulted in the downsizing of hospitals and reductions in the ratio of long-term beds to the population aged 75 and over, community care budgets have increased substantially during this time. The article also discusses the major issues now confronting Canadian policy-makers and planning in regards to these programs and explores the potential impact of factors such as changes in funding and the organization and delivery of other health care services on long-term care.     

Canada's universal-comprehensive healthcare system

The Canadian healthcare system consists of provincial- and territorial-based health insurance plans that provide universal-comprehensive coverage for medically necessary hospital and physician services, the public funding of healthcare with no financial-access barriers, and the private delivery of care. A profile of the Canadian system and its expenditures fosters some noteworthy comparisons between Canadian and U.S. healthcare.     

The Canadian and U.S. health care systems: profiles and policies

Comparisons are made in this article between the Canadian and U.S. health care insurance and delivery systems. Canada has universal, comprehensive, and publicly funded health insurance for medically necessary hospital and physician services. The United States does not. Aggregate health care expenditures for both countries are examined as are those for the hospital and physician services sectors. Policy differences between both systems, including system models, health insurance financing, resource commitment and control, and service limits, are presented. Observations are made regarding two elements of the Canadian model--prospective physician sector and prospective hospital global budgeting--and whether they are transplantable to the United States.     

Corporatization and deprivatization of health services in Canada

Canada's system of health services has been shaped by the forces and values in the Canadian political, cultural, social, and economic environment; these forces continue to place constraints on future changes. We distinguish between "corporatization" and "privatization", and the implications of each for improved efficiency of the system. Although the organization of health services is, in certain provinces, undergoing significant structural changes, there is evidence that rather than privatizing, the system may actually be continuing to experience what we have termed deprivatization, as the scope of government involvement expands to include a more comprehensive definition of health care. Trends in Canada differ considerably from those in the United States; universal health insurance has curbed the ability and desire of institutions to exclude members of some socioeconomic groups from receiving care. U.S.-based models, if applied to Canada, could lead to both higher costs and lower quality of care. Considerable efficiencies can be realized within Canada's current system.     

Competition in health care delivery of the U.S.: panacea or poison? A critical view

The U.S. are experiencing growth rates in health care cost, which in Europe have been reduced effectively in most states. The new strategy to reduce the cost increases relies heavily on price competition among providers. It is argued that while reducing cost among the paying patients, the constraints on the system will negatively effect the care delivery for the indigent population who are unable to pay for their health care services, revealing that savings are made on the back of the needy. As the U.S. health care system does not include care for those unable to pay for the services price competitive approaches will not be able to solve deficits of the American health care delivery system but rather lead to an increasing number of people who are in need of services, unless a national program to cover every American's basic health needs will be implemented.     

Canadians write a new Rx for healthcare. Canada's healthcare system is not a panacea, but it raises interesting issues for the United States

The Canadians have been impressive in delivering universal healthcare access and high-quality care. Operating under global budgets set by provincial governments, Canadian hospitals have prudently managed available resources to meet community needs. A weakness of this single-payer system, however, is its inability to effectively coordinate and integrate services delivered by hospitals, physicians, and other providers. As the U.S. health system faces stringent cost containment with President Bill Clinton's proposal, significant savings are expected of U.S. hospitals. New alliances constrained by global budgets might require healthcare services managers to operate under a disparate set of assumptions and incentives. Before making such a transition, we can learn from the experiences of our Canadian colleagues. The challenges for both nations in the remaining years of this century will be drawn primarily from the effective macromanagement controls of the Canadian system and the lessons being learned from the U.S. managed care networks. This will occur as each nation strives to provide a more effective, less costly, integrated delivery of healthcare services.     

HIV donor funding has both boosted and curbed the delivery of different non-HIV health services in sub-Saharan Africa

Donor funding for HIV programs has increased rapidly over the past decade, raising questions about whether other health services in recipient-country health systems are being crowded out or strengthened. This article--an investigation of the impacts of increased HIV donor funding on non-HIV health services in sub-Saharan Africa during 2003-10--provides evidence of both effects. HIV aid in some countries has crowded out the delivery of childhood immunizations, especially in countries with the lowest density of health care providers. At the same time, HIV aid may have positively affected some maternal health services, such as prenatal blood testing. These mixed results suggest that donors should be more attentive to domestic resource constraints, such as limited numbers of health workers; should integrate more fully with existing health systems; and should address these constraints up front to limit possible negative effects on the delivery of other health services.     

Health economics and resource management: a model for hospital efficiency

As health care spending continues to climb, government and industry, as the two major purchasers of health care services, are intensifying their scrutiny over health care delivery in an attempt to reduce their health care burden. The first round of utilization controls and reimbursement restrictions focused on necessity of admission and efficiency of care, causing a profound effect on hospital-based services. Declining occupancy rates, reduced inpatient reimbursements, and mounting contractual losses have pushed many hospitals to the point of financial disaster. The second round of controls has expanded into the outpatient sector and will begin to focus on both appropriateness of treatment and outcome of care, affecting both hospital and physician-related services. In an environment of increasing external pressures for appropriateness, justification and outcome of medical services, and potential financial risk imposed by reimbursement cutoffs or penalties for unnecessary care, hospitals and physicians are under increasing pressure to improve their efficiency as health care providers. The resource management model is presented as an example of how hospitals and physicians can monitor health care services and improve their performance in the delivery of more cost-efficient, high-quality medical care. The importance of hospital-physician education, communication, and interaction is stressed as a means of attaining internal control over a system plagued by resource-limited external constraints.     

Socio-spatial patterns of home care use in Ontario, Canada: A case study

Home care is the fastest growing segment of Canada's health care system. Since the mid-1990s, the management and delivery of home care has changed dramatically in the province of Ontario. The objective of this paper is to examine the socio-spatial characteristics of home care use (both formal and informal) in Ontario among residents aged 20 and over. Data are drawn from two cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS Cycle 3.1 2005 and Cycle 4.1 2007) and are analyzed at a number of geographical scales and across the urban to rural continuum. The study found that rural residents were more likely than their urban counterparts to receive government-funded home care, particularly nursing care services. However, rural residents were less likely to receive nursing care that was self-financed through for-profit agencies and were more reliant on informal care provided by a family member. The study also revealed that women and seniors were far more dependent on services that they paid for as compared to informal services. People with lower incomes and poorer health status, as well as rural residents, were also more likely to use informal services. The paper postulates that the introduction of managed competition in Ontario's home care sector may be effective in more populated parts of the province, including large cities, but at the same time may have left a void in access to for-profit formal services in rural and remote regions.     

Health care reform and the paradox of efficiency: "writing in" culture.

Widespread global migration is occurring at the same time that health care delivery systems in Western nations are undergoing major restructuring. The call for health care to be more efficient, economical, and responsive to diverse cultural populations has come from several sectors, including governments and researchers. This has led to policies to address perceived deficiencies in health care services. The authors draw on their research at health care institutions in a western Canadian city to probe, first, how the concept of culture is interpreted within organizations; and second, how culture is "written into health systems" as they undergo restructuring. Meanings and interpretations of culture are not transparent; moreover, "writing in" culture is not simply a matter of health care providers learning about their clients' "belief systems" and being sensitive to these beliefs. Belief systems and people's experiences of the care they receive are negotiated within highly complex "organizational cultures," located in broader macroeconomic and political structures, and discourses that shape how health care systems are organized. The authors consider whether current discourses on cost containment are in competition with providing equitable health care services to diverse client populations.     

Health literacy within the reality of immigrants' culture and language

The Second Canadian Conference on Literacy and Health addressed issues of health literacy, culture, and linguistic diversity. This article aims to introduce the presenters' ideas, reports of the learners' discussion, and attendees' recommendations. There is also a literature review of the links between health literacy and use of health services among newcomers in Canada. Newcomers to Canada tend to be unfamiliar with the Canadian health care system in terms of navigating needed services and/or seeking health-related information. Health professionals report difficulties in communicating effectively with these populations about risk-taking behaviours. Educational resources and approaches only partially reach people from cultural minorities. E-health information does little for those with language and literacy limitations. Barriers to accessing information, specifically written material, are widely reported. Consequently, many ethnocultural groups do not participate in health promotion initiatives. Among newcomers to Canada, the problems of adapting to a new health culture are linked to both a lack of information about the new health care available and subsequently their experience with that health care system. There is also a structural barrier. It includes lack of access to preventive health care services and the lack of a formal and informal support network. This results in less effective use of these preventive services. Linguistic, religious, and cultural factors contribute to the newcomers' social isolation. Multidisciplinary work to enhance health literacy and awareness about health and healthy lifestyles will permit ethnocultural populations to develop their potential and more fully enjoy their lives in Canada. Simultaneously, health educators should have the opportunity to realize their limitations and challenges in dealing with the complexity of providing health education to this population. There remain gaps in our knowledge about the access and use of health services by subpopulations from different cultural groups in terms of their gender, learning practices, ways of navigating services, and help-seeking behaviours.     

Wisconsin Assn. has Well-Rounded Program

Over the next decade, health care expenditures will continue to increase, not only in total dollars, but as a percent of Gross National Product. Despite increasing government and institutional efforts to contain costs, we believe that the underlying demand factors will be strong enough to more than compensate for constraints on growth in expenditures.

Exerting strong pressures on demand will be demographic influences, particularly the ?graying” of America and related greater use of health care facilities by senior citizens; expansion of both private and public insurance coverage; and intensification of care due to medical and technological advances. Nevertheless, we expect cost containment pressures to influence the delivery of health care, particularly deployment of services.

We believe these changes will be accompanied by growing recognition that the health care industry is a business and thus can benefit from application of modern management techniques.

We expect health care to evolve from a fragmented cottage industry into a more integrated national system. This shift will be accompanied by greater use of technology, not only to support new medical advances and expand the delivery of health care services, but more importantly, to increase the efficiency and quality of health care service delivery.     

A generative response to palliative service capacity in Canada

PURPOSE: This paper situates a large-scale learning and service development capacity-building initiative for hospice palliative care services within the current Canadian policy context for use by international readers. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: In 2000 a national initiative using action research as its design was crafted to support continuing professional development and knowledge management in primary-health care environments. FINDINGS: The Canadian health policy context is complex and requires innovative solutions to achieve desired changes in response to emerging population health demands for quality end-of-life care. Employment of educational and social science constructs, including complexity theory, communities of practice, transformative learning theory, and workplace learning methods, has proven helpful in supporting the creation of national capacity for hospice palliative care. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: There is a significant contribution for social scientists to make in aiding a better understanding of the complexity in health systems. At the same time, an aging population in industrial countries demands more active engagement of legal and bioethical scholars in a range of emerging policy and legislative questions about quality end-of-life care. Educational research is also required to understand better and reform curricula to prepare an emerging generation of health science practitioners for the demands of an aging population. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Changing health service delivery environments demand rethinking of the knowledge and skills leaders require to influence desired change. A broader understanding of where and how learning takes place is essential for enhancing the quality of patient care. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The Pallium Project represents a generative response to facilitating learning and building longer-term system capacity. The journey of project development to date illustrates some important lessons that can be adopted from hospice palliative care to inform other primary-health care initiatives, including, potentially, mental health, cardiology, diabetes, geriatrics, where productive change can result from productively linking specialists and primary-care colleagues.     

Health in Israel: patterns of equality and inequality

While Israel does not have a nationalized health care system, 94.5% of its population is covered by comprehensive health insurance which includes curative and preventive ambulatory care as well as hospitalization. There is formal equality in access, distribution, and quality of the health services; nevertheless, there are pockets of deprivation that affect certain segments of the population. The paper focuses on three topics: (a) structure of the health care delivery system in terms of coverage, geographical and social distribution, and the public/private balance of the services; (b) processes of health care delivery in terms of utilization and quality; (c) health outcomes in terms of mortality, morbidity, health behavior, and disease vulnerability. Inequality in Israel appears to be structured in terms of six dimensions: coverage of health insurance, distribution of health services, the balance of public and private sectors of health services, utilization of existing services, quality of health services, and health outcomes as expressed by mortality, morbidity, health behavior and risk factors. Only two types of health care are not covered by the general health insurance: (a) dental care, and (b) long-term nursing care. Given the small area of Israel there are striking differences in the geographic distribution of health personnel of various types. There is evidence for gaps between needs and institutional services for many elderly who are on waiting lists for institutionalization. The ratio of primary care physicians to population is 1:2326 in development towns and 1:1852 in the older more established veteran communities. Kibbutzim, which are also located in large part in geographically remote areas, enjoy high quality health services and are not characterized by low ratios of health care personnel. In 1968-69, 6% of those insured by the sick funds purchased services at least once from a private physician, while in 1975-76 this figure rose to 32%. As in other countries, utilization of preventive services is generally correlated with socio-economic status and with education. While the network of primary care facilities in Israel is widespread and generally accessible, it is poorly integrated with the hospital system. Longevity has increased over the past years and is relatively high; 76.6 for women and 73.1 for men in 1984. Nevertheless, differences between Jews and non-Jews may still be seen among both men and women. The same may be said concerning mortality and especially with regard to infant mortality. Differences with regard to certain risk factors among Jewish infants and adults are correlated with socio-economic class and country of origin.     

Building the infrastructure for primary health care: an overview of vertical and integrated approaches

In the past four decades there has been a succession of different approaches to the development of infrastructure for the delivery of health services. There have been striking similarities among these approaches in both direction and timing in many different countries, particularly in the developing world. While the general trend has been strongly in the direction of a more comprehensive, integrated health infrastructure, there have been important regressions from this path. It is suggested that the recent attention given to the delivery of 'selective' packages of interventions has often diverted energy and resources from the essential task of developing comprehensive, efficient and effective health services. This paper begins with an historical review of trends in the development of health services infrastructure in recent decades. It proceeds to analyse the implications for the organization of health services and for resource allocation when the health services infrastructure is viewed as part of a health system based on primary health care. Finally, we maintain that district health systems based on primary health care provide an excellent practical model for health development, including an appropriate health system infrastructure. Within this model the concerns with accelerating the application of known and effective technologies and the concerns with strengthening of community involvement and intersectoral action for health are both accommodated. The district health system provides a realistic setting for dialogue and planning involving both professionals and non-professionals concerned with health and social development.     

美国长期照护服务体系对中国的启示

本文综述了美国长期照护服务体系的服务机构、服务方式和服务提供者及其角色。美国长期照护服务机构可提供长期入住照护、短期入住照护、成人日间照护及居家照护服务,服务方式逐渐从机构服务向居家与社区服务转变。长期照护服务由正式照料者和非正式照料者共同提供,正式照料者提供有偿服务,非正式家庭照料者以女儿(29.3%)和配偶(21.2%)为主,随着居家和社区服务可用性增加,家庭照料者与有偿的正式照料者分担长期照护的可能性更大。美国长期照护服务体系结构完善,准入机制严格且系统,强调服务质量和效果评价,且重视老年人个人意愿,尊重其服务偏好和选择权利。基于美国的经验,我国在探索长期照护服务体系时,应以居家和社区照护为主,充分发挥社区卫生服务机构、社会和家庭的力量,注重服务机构和内容的多样化,建立完善和详细的服务使用评估标准,强调服务质量的有效性评价,体现人性化。     

Canadian and the United States' health care systems performance and governance: elements of convergence

International comparisons of the organisation and performance of health care sectors are increasingly informing policy makers about potential policies relating to health care. Politicians, academics and critics in both the United States and Canada have compared and contrasted the health care systems in the two countries. Public debate tends to emphasise the differences between the US and Canadian health care systems. But, dramatic differences between the organisation and performances of health care systems of the two countries would be surprising given that most elements of divergence have only emerged in the last fifty years, and that health systems tend to be driven by the same basic economic problems. This paper provides an overview of the main economic efficiency issues that must be addressed by health care delivery systems, as well as statistical and related evidence on both input usage and output performance of the two health care systems. While Canada clearly spends less on health care, it is difficult to conclude that Canada has a more efficient health care system than the United States. In particular, the US population puts greater demands on its national health care system owing to a combination of behavioural patterns and socio-economic disparities that contribute to much higher rates of violent accidents, as well as specific diseases and other health problems. Also, the stylized representation of the US system as being 'market-driven' and the Canadian system as being 'centrally controlled' is, increasingly, inept. Both systems are evolving toward bureaucratic models that rely more on internal competition than market competition for governance. In this respect, economic forces are nudging both systems towards a convergence of structure and performance.     

Oral health care services in Europe

Health care is being reformed in Europe. Comparative analyses of oral health care services are scarce. Little is known about the relationship between organisation and financing of services and the effectiveness, efficiency and equity of the services. The purpose of the paper is to present some features of the delivery of oral health care services and to discuss some recent changes in a public health perspective. Some of the recent changes in oral health care are: Decentralisation of management in the public services, less third party payment and higher patient charges, more emphasis on free consumer choice. The dominant model of delivery of oral health care is the single private practitioner. The traditional structure of delivery of dental services is challenged by the demands of societies. There seems to be a trade-off between simplicity and the tailor-made mixed payments: gains in degree of freedom through the use of mixed payment systems have to be balanced against losses in terms of simplicity of implementation and equality of the oral health outcome. The roles of the provider, the consumer and the financing institutions are imbedded in trust and regulation. There is therefore a growing recognition of the necessity for a strong role of public health.