University and Community Hospital Medical Student Emergency Medicine Clerkship Experiences

Objective : To determine whether there is a significant difference between educational opportunities for fourth-year medical students rotating at a university hospital (UH) compared with several community hospitals (CHs) during a mandatory emergency medicine (EM) clerkship.
Methods : A self-reported clinical tool was completed in real time by each student rotating for 2 weeks at the UH and 2 weeks at 1 of 4 CHs (3 affiliated and 1 unaffiliated). Students are required to document the number of patients seen and the number of procedures performed on each of 20 six-hour shifts. They rated the EM attending clinical teaching by site using a 5-point scale at the end of the clerkship.
Results : Most (95%) of the 87 students in the 7 clerkship blocks of the 1996–97 academic year rotated at the UH and a CH. Most (71%) students rated both the UH and the CH for the quality of teaching by attendings. There was a significant difference in the mean number of patients evaluated/shift (2.2 ± 0.10 vs 2.8 ± 0.10, UH vs CH; p < 0.001) and the mean number of procedures performed/shift (0.36 ± 0.04 vs 0.56 ± 0.05, UH vs CH; p < 0.001). Attending clinical teaching scores were significantly higher (p = 0.03) at the CHs.
Conclusions : The educational opportunities for students in an EM clerkship to evaluate patients and perform procedures were significantly greater at the community hospitals. Inclusion of community hospital settings in a medical student EM clerkship may optimize the clinical experience.     

Faculty Evaluations Correlate Poorly with Medical Student Examination Performance in a Fourth-Year Emergency Medicine Clerkship

Background

Clerkship directors routinely evaluate medical students using multiple modalities, including faculty assessment of clinical performance and written examinations. Both forms of evaluation often play a prominent role in final clerkship grade. The degree to which these modalities correlate in an emergency medicine (EM) clerkship is unclear.

Emergency Medicine Clerkship Encounter and Procedure Logging Using Handheld Computers

Background Tracking medical student clinical encounters is now an accreditation requirement of medical schools. The use of handheld computers for electronic logging is emerging as a strategy to achieve this.
Objectives To evaluate the technical feasibility and student satisfaction of a novel electronic logging and feedback program using handheld computers in the emergency department.
Methods This was a survey study of fourth-year medical student satisfaction with the use of their handheld computers for electronic logging of patient encounters and procedures. The authors also included an analysis of this technology.
Results Forty-six students participated in this pilot project, logging a total of 2,930 encounters. Students used the logs an average of 7.6 shifts per rotation, logging an average of 8.3 patients per shift. Twenty-nine students (63%) responded to the survey. Students generally found it easy to complete each encounter (69%) and easy to synchronize their handheld computer with the central server (83%). However, half the students (49%) never viewed the feedback Web site and most (79%) never reviewed their logs with their preceptors. Overall, only 17% found the logging program beneficial as a learning tool.
Conclusions Electronic logging by medical students during their emergency medicine clerkship has many potential benefits as a method to document clinical encounters and procedures performed. However, this study demonstrated poor compliance and dissatisfaction with the process. In order for electronic logging using handheld computers to be a beneficial educational tool for both learners and educators, obstacles to effective implementation need to be addressed.     

An Educator''s Guide to Teaching Emergency Medicine to Medical Students

There is a need for every medical school graduate to handle emergencies as they arise in the daily practice of medicine. Emergency medicine (EM) educators are in a unique position to provide students with basic life support skills, guidance in assessing the undifferentiated patient, and exposure to the specialty of EM during all years of medical school. Emergency physicians can become involved in a variety of education experiences that can supplement the preclinical curriculum and provide access to our specialty at an early stage. A well-designed course in the senior year allows students to develop critical thinking and patient management skills that are necessary for any medical career path. It can ensure that all medical students are exposed to the skills essential for evaluating and stabilizing the acutely ill patient. To implement this type of course, learning objectives and evaluation methods must be set when the curriculum is developed. An effective course combines didactic and clinical components that draw on the strengths of the teaching institution and faculty of the department. A structured clerkship orientation session and system for feedback to students are essential in nurturing the development of student learners. This article provides an approach to assist the medical student clerkship director in planning and implementing EM education experiences for students at all levels of training, with an emphasis on the senior-year rotation.     

Understanding Clerkship Student Roles in the Context of 21st-Century Healthcare Systems and Curricular Reform

ABSTRACT

Phenomenon: Preclerkship medical education has undergone extensive reform, and the clerkship years are growing targets for curricular innovation. As institutions implement new preclerkship curricula to better prepare medical students to practice medicine in the context of modern healthcare systems, the perspective of clerkship leaders regarding clerkship student roles and potential for change will facilitate redefining these roles so that preclerkship educational innovations can continue into clerkships. Approach: In this qualitative exploratory study, authors conducted semistructured interviews with clerkship and site directors for eight core clerkships from April to May 2016. Questions addressed how clerkship leaders perceive current student roles and the potential for change. Through iterative consensus building, authors identified themes describing current ideal clerkship student roles applicable to future roles. Findings: Twenty-three of 24 (96%) directors participated. Findings fell into four themes: factors influencing the clerkship role, clerkship student role archetypes, workplace authenticity and value, and potential for change. Student, supervisor, and context factors determine the clerkship student role. Three role archetypes emerged: the apprentice (an assistant completing concrete patient care tasks), the academic (a researcher bringing literature back to the team), and the communicator (an interdisciplinary and patient liaison). Each archetype was considered authentic and valuable. Positive attitudes toward preclerkship curricular changes were associated with openness to evolution of the clerkship students' role. These emerging roles mapped to the archetypes. Insights: Clerkship leaders perceive that student, supervisor, and context factors result in varying emphasis on role archetypes, which in turn lead to different types of learning. Medical educators can use the archetypes to articulate how expanded student roles align learning with clinical needs, particularly as they relate to health systems science and inquiry.     

Political and Budget Issues Associated with Educating Medical Students

The senior year provides an excellent opportunity for medical students to experience the specialty of emergency medicine for career exploration and skill development. This educational experience can provide the medical school with the means to meet the Liaison Committee on Medical Education recommendation that all graduating students should be capable of handling emergencies. The senior rotation may be a mandatory or elective experience. It is in the emergency department that students can gain experience in evaluating the undifferentiated patient and may refine their history and physical examination skills. They have the chance to become adept at rapid decision making in the diagnosis and stabilization of patients. This paper outlines the components of a typical four‐week rotation, such as the orientation session, the didactic program, the clinical experience, the evaluation of students, the faculty, and the educational experience. Strategies for implementing both didactic and clinical components of the curriculum are provided. The managerial role of the clerkship director is introduced. Suggestions for assuming administrative and educational responsibility for an existing course are made. A guide to the development and implementation of a new course is described, in which the course objectives and prerequisites must be set, the core didactic curriculum formulated, the clinical experience defined, and a system of evaluation and feedback developed. Students generally enjoy their emergency medicine experience as it is often their first opportunity to assume primary responsibility for patient care. Clerkship directors can develop their leadership skills in managing a major educational component of the senior year that may prove beneficial in developing a career in the field of medical education.     

The Effect of Resident Duty-Hours Restrictions on Internal Medicine Clerkship Experiences: Surveys of Medical Students and Clerkship Directors

Phenomenon: Medical students receive much of their inpatient teaching from residents who now experience restructured teaching services to accommodate the 2011 duty-hour regulations (DHR). The effect of DHR on medical student educational experiences is unknown. We examined medical students’ and clerkship directors’ perceptions of the effects of the 2011 DHR on internal medicine clerkship students’ experiences with teaching, feedback and evaluation, and patient care. Approach: Students at 14 institutions responded to surveys after their medicine clerkship or subinternship. Students who completed their clerkship (n = 839) and subinternship (n = 228) March to June 2011 (pre-DHR historical controls) were compared to clerkship students (n = 895) and subinterns (n = 377) completing these rotations March to June 2012 (post-DHR). Z tests for proportions correcting for multiple comparisons were performed to assess attitude changes. The Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine annual survey queried institutional members about the 2011 DHR just after implementation. Findings: Survey response rates were 64% and 50% for clerkship students and 60% and 48% for subinterns in 2011 and 2012 respectively, and 82% (99/121) for clerkship directors. Post-DHR, more clerkship students agreed that attendings (p =.011) and interns (p =.044) provided effective teaching. Clerkship students (p =.013) and subinterns (p =.001) believed patient care became more fragmented. The percentage of holdover patients clerkship students (p =.001) and subinterns (p =.012) admitted increased. Clerkship directors perceived negative effects of DHR for students on all survey items. Most disagreed that interns (63.1%), residents (67.8%), or attendings (71.1%) had more time to teach. Most disagreed that students received more feedback from interns (56.0%) or residents (58.2%). Fifty-nine percent felt that students participated in more patient handoffs. Insights: Students perceive few adverse consequences of the 2011 DHR on their internal medicine experiences, whereas their clerkship director educators have negative perceptions. Future research should explore the impact of fragmented patient care on the student–patient relationship and students’ clinical skills acquisition.     

Positive Outcomes of Optimizing Student–Preceptor Continuity in a Traditional Block Clerkship

Problem: Student–preceptor discontinuity during 3rd-year clerkships limits the quality and quantity of supervision, teaching, and feedback. Although longitudinal integrative clerkships increase continuity and are associated with improved student and preceptor experience, they require schoolwide curricular reform. Alternative innovations enhancing student–preceptor relationships within the constraints of a traditional block clerkship may demonstrate similar benefits. Intervention: We piloted a continuity-enhanced general pediatric ambulatory schedule during 2 consecutive clerkship blocks in 2013. Students in the continuity-enhanced model (n = 29) were assigned 1–3 primary clinic preceptors, whereas those in the traditional model (n = 30) worked with 5–8. Data were gathered from student assessments and anonymous student and preceptor surveys. We used t and Fisher's exact tests to compare the two groups and performed thematic analysis of free-text survey comments. Context: Our school utilizes a block clerkship model with approximately 30 students rotating through the pediatric clerkship every 8 weeks. During the 3-week ambulatory portion, students spend 8 half days in the general pediatric ambulatory clinic. At the conclusion of each clinic, attendings completed brief student evaluation cards. Traditionally, student and attending schedules were created independently, resulting in transient supervisory relationships and dissatisfaction with clinical engagement, feedback, and evaluation. Outcome: Seventy-three percent (43/59) of the students completed the survey. Ten general ambulatory attendings collectively completed 87.5% (35/40) of the monthly surveys. Continuity students received significantly more narrative evaluation comments (10.6 vs. 5.8, p <. 001) from general ambulatory clinic attendings and were more likely to have at least one general ambulatory clinic attending endorse being able to provide meaningful feedback and evaluation (n = 29, 100% vs. n = 20, 66.7%, p <. 001). Continuity students were also more likely to endorse being able to ask at least one of these attendings for a letter of recommendation (71.4% vs. 9.1%, p <. 001) and to have at least one general ambulatory clinic attending endorse being able to provide a meaningful letter of recommendation if asked (62.1% vs. 3.3%, p <. 001). Students (88.4%) and attendings (85.7%) preferred the continuity-enhanced schedule. The most frequent theme of both student and attending free-text survey remarks were relationships and assessment. Lessons Learned: Intentional scheduling of clerkship students to enhance preceptor continuity resulted in significant positive outcomes echoing the relationship-based educational benefits of longitudinal clerkships, particularly in regards to student assessment and feedback. Clerkship directors and other medical educators should consider implementing small changes within block clerkships to maximize student–preceptor continuity.     

A Case–based Emergency Medicine Curriculum for Senior Medical Students

Objective: To determine the effects of a case–based, core content–oriented emergency medicine (EM) curriculum on the basic EM knowledge of senior medical students.
Methods: All senior medical students rotating through the Milwaukee County EM elective during the 1992–1993 academic year were assigned specific chapter readings from a case–oriented EM textbook. A course curriculum consisting of goals and objectives for each chapter and two to three representative cases for the discussion topic also was distributed to each student. Interspersed with the cases was a series of questions directed at pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and disposition. The EM faculty and residents conducted case discussions three times per week. AH students completing the rotation were given a pretest at the beginning and a final examination at the end of the rotation. In addition, the students rated the textbook, coursebook, and lecture series at the end of the rotation using a five–point Likert scale.
Results: Seventy–five students rotated through the elective. The students showed a significant improvement in their EM knowledge base as judged by improvement in final examination scores compared with pretest scores (pretest score 62.2 ± 7.1%; final examination score 76.2 ± 6.3%; p < 0.0001). The mean change in scores was 14.8%, with a range of –1.6% to 34%. The students also rated the textbook, coursebook, and lecture series as effective, as shown by high median scores on a Likert scale.
Conclusions: A case–based EM curriculum coupled with ED clinical experience improves basic EM diagnostic and management knowledge of senior medical students.     

Need for Standardized Sign-out in the Emergency Department: A Survey of Emergency Medicine Residency and Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Program Directors

Objectives
To determine the existing patterns of sign-out processes prevalent in emergency departments (EDs) nationwide. In addition, to assess whether training programs provide specific guidance to their trainees regarding sign-outs and attitudes of emergency medicine (EM) residency and pediatric EM fellowship program directors toward the need for the development of standardized guidelines relating to sign-outs.
Methods
A Web-based survey of training program directors of each Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)–accredited EM residency and pediatric EM fellowship program was conducted in March 2006.
Results
Overall, 185 (61.1%) program directors responded to the survey. One hundred thirty-six (73.5%) program directors reported that sign-outs at change of shift occurred in a common area within the ED, and 79 (42.7%) respondents indicated combined sign-outs in the presence of both attending and resident physicians. A majority of the programs, 119 (89.5%), stated that there was no uniform written policy regarding patient sign-out in their ED. Half (50.3%) of all those surveyed reported that physicians sign out patient details "verbally only," and 79 (42.9%) noted that transfer of attending responsibility was "rarely documented." Only 34 (25.6%) programs affirmed that they had formal didactic sessions focused on sign-outs. A majority (71.6%) of program directors surveyed agreed that specific practice parameters regarding transfer of care in the ED would improve patient care; 80 (72.3%) agreed that a standardized sign-out system in the ED would improve communication and reduce medical error.
Conclusions
There is wide variation in the sign-out processes followed by different EDs. A majority of those surveyed expressed the need for standardized sign-out systems.     

Internal Medicine Core Clerkships Experience With Core Problem Lists: Results From a National Survey of Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine

Background: The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) requires clinical clerkships in North American Medical Schools to define and monitor core problems and clinical conditions for medical students and adjust the clerkships to ensure that all students meet those objectives at all instructional sites. Clinical clerkships usually use medical student generated logbooks to meet these requirements. It is not clear what clinical clerkship directors are doing to meet these standards. Purpose: To determine how internal medicine clerkship directors develop problem lists, whether and how they verify student problem list entry, and how missed core problems are covered. Methods: The Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine (CDIM) organization conducts an annual survey of its institutional members (one member per medical school). In 2007, 75% of North American medical schools (82 of 110) responded to the survey, which included questions on core problem lists and medical student logbooks. Results: Ninety-four percent of responding medical schools had a core problem list for the core internal medicine clerkship. Most schools used an electronic logbook and verified student exposure to core problems (76%). The clerkship director usually did the verification (63%). Clerkships offered a variety of options to remedy lack of exposure to core problems and usually offered more than one option. Conclusions: Clerkship directors in internal medicine develop, verify, and ensure exposure to core problems in internal medicine. Most clerkship directors used the CDIM recommended core problem list as a basis for their local core problem list. Emerging computer-assisted learning options may simplify clerkship adjustments for lack of exposure to core problems. It appears that clerkship directors are using logbooks appropriately to meet the LCME charge to monitor core problems and clinical conditions.     

Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors' Use of and Opinions About Clerkship Examinations

Background: For years, quantifiable examinations have been a core component of assessing medical student competence during the internal medicine clerkship.

Purpose: To determine how internal medicine clerkship directors use and view examinations and how uses of examinations have changed.

Methods: In 1999, the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine conducted a confidential survey of its 123 institutional members.

Results: Survey response rate was 89% (109/123). The National Board of Medical Examiners subject examination was used by 83%, alone (49%) or in combination with a faculty developed examination or a standardized patient examination (34%). Minimum passing scores were required for the subject exam by 80%, for faculty-developed examinations by 65%, and for the standardized patient exam by 63%. Examinations contribute approximately 25% toward a student's final grade. Students with acceptable clerkship performances but who fail an exam typically retest after self-study. Students who fail a retest receive unsatisfactory grades and require additional medicine experience.

Of the clerkship directors who reported using the National Board of Medical Examiners subject examination, 45 (50%) provided comments on ways to improve the examination. Comments focused on examination content, reporting results, basing the exam on a published core curriculum, and general administrative issues. Over the past decade, use of the National Board of Medical Examiners subject examination has increased (66% to 83%), use of faculty-developed examinations has declined (46% to 27%), and the use of a clerkship standardized patient examination increased sharply (2% to 27%).

Conclusions: Internal medicine clerkship directors commonly require students to pass standardized or locally developed exams and use test results to make academic decisions. The use of standardized patient examinations has increased significantly and likely reflects a broadening of competency assessment. Our results can serve as a basis for individual programmatic evaluation, for internal medicine and other clerkship directors.     

Length of Attending-Student and Resident-Student Interactions in the Inpatient Medicine Clerkship

Phenomenon: Changes in the medical education milieu have led away from the apprenticeship model resulting in shorter physician–student interactions. Faculty and student feedback suggests that supervisor/student interactions may now be more cursory with increasing numbers of supervisors per student, and shorter duration of interaction. This may affect both education and student assessment. Approach: We compared inpatient attending and resident daily schedules with those of 3rd- and 4th-year medical students rotating on medicine clerkships at Brigham and Women's Hospital during academic years 2009–11 to determine the number of days of overlap. We used evaluation forms to determine the extent of evaluator's self-reported knowledge of the student. Findings: We correlated the daily schedules of 199 students and 204 resident and 187 attending physicians, which resulted in 558 resident–student pairings and 680 attending–student pairings over 2 years. During a 4-week block, students averaged 3.7 attending physicians (M = 4, range = 2–7), with 49.7% supervised by 4 or more. Attending-student overlap averaged 9 days (M = 9, range = 2–23), though 40% were 7 days or less. Students overlapped with an average 3.4 residents (M = 3, range = 1–6). Resident-student overlap averaged 12 days (M = 11, range = 3–26). There were 824 student assessment forms analyzed. Resident and attending physician supervisors describing knowledge of their student as “good/average” overlapped with students for 14 and 11 days respectively compared to resident and physician supervisors who described their knowledge as “poor” (11 days, p < .01; 6 days, p < .01). Insights: On the inpatient medicine clerkship, students have multiple supervising physicians with wide variability in the period of overlap. This leads to a disrupted apprenticeship model with fragmentation of supervision and concomitant effects on assessment, feedback, role modeling, and clerkship education.     

Developing a third-year emergency medicine medical student curriculum: a syllabus of content

Emergency medicine (EM) educators have published several curricular guides designed for medical student rotations and experiences. These guides primarily provided brief overviews of opportunities to incorporate EM into all 4 years of the medical student curriculum, with one specific to the fourth year. However, there are no published guidelines specific to third-year medical students rotating in EM. Given the differences between third-year and fourth-year students in terms of clinical experience, knowledge, and skills, the Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM) established the Third-year EM Medical Student Curriculum Work Group to create a third-year curriculum. The work group began this process by developing consensus-based recommendations for the content of a third-year medical student EM rotation, which are presented in this syllabus.     

Outcome Assessment in Emergency Medicine—A Beginning: Results of the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) Emergency Medicine Consensus Workgroup on Outcome Assessment

This article is designed to serve as a guide for emergency medicine (EM) educators seeking to comply with the measurement and reporting requirements for Phase 3 of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Outcome Project. A consensus workshop held during the 2006 Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) "Best Practices" conference identified specific measures for five of the six EM competencies—interpersonal communication skills, patient care, practice-based learning, professionalism, and systems-based practice (medical knowledge was excluded). The suggested measures described herein should allow for ease in data collection and applicability to multiple core competencies as program directors incorporate core competency outcome measurement into their EM residency training programs.     

Clerkships in Emergency Medicine

Planning for clerkships in emergency medicine (EM) can be stressful, prolonged, and challenging. Therefore, medical students should start planning for them early. In this article, we offer guidance regarding several issues pertinent to the EM clerkship, such as the best time to schedule one (or more) during medical school, the most appropriate institution or program to schedule it, the process of selecting and applying for the clerkship, and the number of EM clerkships to consider. We will explain why an EM clerkship should be scheduled between June and October and the reason that 2 EM clerkships at different sites are sufficient for the majority of students. Additionally, we emphasize that clerkships in emergency departments associated with EM residency programs or with reputations for outstanding student teaching tend to be most beneficial. Above all, students interested in EM should attempt to leave a great impression after completing their clerkships by providing stellar patient care, demonstrating enthusiasm at all times, and maintaining professionalism. In turn, they will gain knowledge and clinical experiences that should prove valuable in their future.     

The Impact of Two Clinical Shift Allocation Models on Student Experiences in an Emergency Medicine Clerkship

Background: Medical students on Emergency Medicine (EM) clerkships are traditionally assigned work shifts in a manner that provides a mix of daytime, evening, overnight, and weekend shifts. Whether or not this shift allocation model provides the optimal educational experience remains unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of two different shift allocation models on the student's clerkship experience. Specifically, we set out to compare the traditional shift allocation model to a novel model designed to maximize teacher–learner continuity. Methods: This was a prospective, crossover, cohort study of medical students participating in an EM clerkship at one institution from January 1 through April 31, 2010. All students completed 2 weeks of shifts under the “traditional shift model” and 2 weeks of shifts under the “continuity-based shift model.” In the latter, the guiding principle of student shift allocation was continuity between teacher and learner. Students completed coded surveys after each 2-week block that were later matched and analyzed using 2-way ANOVAs with 1 repeated measure. In addition, all students participated in a semistructured group interview at the completion of both blocks. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative methods. Themes and subthemes that emerged were assessed for frequency of occurrence. Results: Eighteen medical students consented to participate. Students rated the continuity-based shift model higher on all 10 survey items. However, only the items that asked specifically about “faculty”—faculty teaching, faculty interaction, frequency and quality of faculty feedback—were rated significantly higher when students worked under the continuity-based shift model. Qualitative analysis of group interviews revealed 6 major themes and 16 subthemes. Students described feedback (N = 16/117) and the teacher–learner relationship (N = 21/117) as superior under the continuity-based shift model. Conclusions: Changes in shift allocation affects student experience in an EM clerkship. A shift allocation model that maximizes the continuity between teacher and learner is perceived by students to improve feedback and the teacher–learner relationship.     

15 Assessing the Clinical Reasoning Skills of Emergency Medicine Clerkship Students Using a Script Concordance Test

Fourth-year medical students in emergency medicine (EM) clerkships are evaluated by various methods. Multiple choice examinations are frequently used to supplement clinical evaluations. These are limited in their ability to evaluate students' clinical reasoning skills. The Script Concordance Test (SCT) is an innovative assessment method developed to evaluate clinical reasoning. The SCT consists of a series of clinical vignettes, each followed by a series of specific questions that present an additional piece of data (a lab result, a physical finding, etc.) to the student. The students then indicate how the additional data affect their thinking regarding a possible diagnosis, an investigational strategy, or a therapeutic intervention, using a 5 point Likert scale (-2,-1,0,+1,+2). SCT questions have no single correct answer; instead, students receive credit based upon the level of agreement between their answers and those of a panel of 10 to 20 expert physicians who take the test to derive the answer key. The SCT is easily administered. In other disciplines, the SCT has demonstrated the ability to differentiate between the clinical reasoning skills of experienced and novice clinicians. The clerkship directors developed an EM SCT using an expert panel of 10 EM attending physicians. For the 07-08 academic year, SCT questions have been incorporated into the EM clerkship end-of-rotation written examination. The EM SCT shows promise as a measure of a student's clinical reasoning ability. Future studies will assess in greater detail the performance and statistical properties of the SCT in the setting of the EM clerkship.     

Adaptation of Medical Students During Clinical Training: Effects of Holistic Preclinical Education on Clerkship Performance

Theory: Taiwan’s medical undergraduate program at a university or medical center is a continuation of 12?years of compulsory citizenship education rooted in holistic philosophies. Students acquire both technical knowledge and nontechnical attributes, which are necessary for success in further work and life. The early clinical learning experiences of medical students are primarily acquired through clerkships. These clerkships require medical students to apply and extend what they learned during their preclinical education; however, previous studies have explored this issue through examining fragmentary factors such as preclinical course grades and traits but not undertaking comprehensive, whole-person investigations. Hypotheses: To account for the potential benefits of a holistic approach in medical students’ learning, we propose three hypotheses: Medical students’ preclinical performance on Taiwan’s technical and nontechnical higher education assessments are positively associated with their clinical competence (Hypothesis 1) and psychological well-being (Hypothesis 2) during clerkships, and medical students’ psychological well-being during clerkships is positively associated with their clinical competence (Hypothesis 3). Method: We studied a cohort of 65 medical students engaged in clerkships from September 2013 to April 2015. Their preclinical technical knowledge scores—formal curricular grades received from course instructors—were obtained from their medical school’s archival dataset. Their nontechnical attributes—moral and social performance scores received from student mentors and physical performance scores received from course instructors—were also obtained from the school’s archival data set. The medical students’ competence in their 2-year clinical clerkships was measured using the objective structured clinical examination scores from the end of both clerkship years. The medical students’ psychological well-being during their 2-year clerkships was measured according to burnout level, which was determined using routine online surveys that employed validated, structured, and self-administered questionnaires at each specialty rotation. Multiple regressions and linear mixed-effects model were employed for statistical analysis. Results: Our study revealed that higher preclinical technical knowledge predicted superior clinical competence and a higher level of burnout during clerkships. By contrast, higher preclinical nontechnical attributes (i.e., higher preclinical moral, social, and physical performance) predicted lower level of burnout. However, no relationship was discovered between clerkship burnout and the clinical competence of the medical students. Conclusions: Our study verified the value of a holistic education that encompasses both technical knowledge and nontechnical attributes during the preclinical learning stage for medical students. Our findings can serve as a reference for medical educators designing preclinical educational programs for medical students.