Case studies of fulvestrant ("Faslodex") in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer

Fulvestrant is a new oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that is licensed for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing following antioestrogen treatment and may also be effective in those progressing after non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors. The use of fulvestrant in a Compassionate Use Programme (CUP) in a "real-life" setting has permitted its activity and tolerability profile in patients with different disease characteristics to be observed. Here, we present five case reports of fulvestrant use in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine therapy. Clinical experience from the CUP supports the published clinical trial data and suggests that fulvestrant is a valuable new treatment for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, including those with visceral metastases and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive disease.     

Fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer

Fulvestrant is a new type of estrogen receptor antagonist with no agonist effects, and represents a valuable addition to the range of endocrine treatments available to treat postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Fulvestrant binds, blocks and degrades the estrogen receptor, thereby retarding growth and progression of hormone-sensitive tumors. Two Phase III trials have demonstrated that fulvestrant is at least as effective as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer following progression on antiestrogen therapy. In addition, a Phase III trial comparing fulvestrant with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer showed similar efficacy and tolerability. Clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate different endocrine sequence options for postmenopausal women with breast cancer, and to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant in combination with anticancer agents that target other signaling pathways.     

Fulvestrant in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer

Fulvestrant is a new type of estrogen receptor antagonist with no agonist effects, and represents a valuable addition to the range of endocrine treatments available to treat postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Fulvestrant binds, blocks and degrades the estrogen receptor, thereby retarding growth and progression of hormone-sensitive tumors. Two Phase III trials have demonstrated that fulvestrant is at least as effective as the third-generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer following progression on antiestrogen therapy. In addition, a Phase III trial comparing fulvestrant with tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer showed similar efficacy and tolerability. Clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate different endocrine sequence options for postmenopausal women with breast cancer, and to evaluate the efficacy of fulvestrant in combination with anticancer agents that target other signaling pathways.     

Fulvestrant and the sequential endocrine cascade for advanced breast cancer

Following relapse on endocrine therapy for advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, it is common for patients to experience responses to alternative endocrine agents. Fulvestrant ('Faslodex') is a new type of endocrine treatment--an oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist with no agonist effects. Fulvestrant downregulates cellular levels of the ER resulting in decreased expression of the progesterone receptor. This unique mode of action means that it is important that fulvestrant is placed optimally within the sequence of endocrine therapies to ensure that patients gain maximum benefit. Fulvestrant has shown efficacy when used after progression on tamoxifen or anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. After progression on fulvestrant, subsequent endocrine treatments can produce responses in many patients, demonstrating that fulvestrant does not lead to crossresistance with other endocrine therapies. Responses to fulvestrant have also been observed in patients heavily pretreated with prior endocrine therapy. Fulvestrant is a versatile endocrine agent that may be integrated into the therapeutic sequence prior to, or subsequent to, other hormonal therapies, and represents a valuable additional antioestrogen for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.     

Inhibition of HER1 signaling pathway enhances antitumor effect of endocrine therapy in breast cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/HER1 is expressed at high levels in at least 20% of breast cancers. This high expression correlates with a poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Experimental and clinical findings suggest that aberrant activation of tyrosine receptor kinases, such as HER1 pathway, play a causal role in the development of antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer. Recent preclinical and clinical evidence shows that inhibition of growth factor signaling pathways suppresses the growth of malignant cells without serious toxicities. To test the hypothesis that inhibition of the HER1 signaling pathway enhances the antitumor effect of endocrine therapy, a promising signal transduction inhibitor (STI) of HER1 tyrosine kinase, gefitinib, and an estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist, fulvestrant, were administered to human breast cancer cells. Our experimental results have revealed that gefitinib additively enhances the antitumor effect of fulvestrant in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells under estrogen-supplemented conditions. An additive increase in the protein expression level of a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21 may play a key role of this additive cytostatic effect. The rationale and future perspectives of the combined use of STIs with endocrine therapy in breast cancer are discussed.     

The role of hormonal therapy in the management of hormonal-receptor-positive breast cancer with co-expression of HER2

Approximately half of breast cancers that overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) also express hormone receptors (HRs). Although HR positivity predicts efficacy of endocrine agents, preclinical and clinical data suggest that HER2 overexpression confers intrinsic resistance to hormonal treatment. In addition, HER2 overexpression is an independent adverse prognostic factor regardless of the hormonal status of the tumor, indicating that patients with HR+/HER2+ breast tumors might not derive a benefit from single-agent hormonal therapy. These data provided a strong rationale for exploring the targeting of both HR and HER2 signaling pathways in HR+/HER2+ breast tumors to optimize hormonal therapy and overcome resistance to anti-estrogen therapy. Results from a randomized clinical trial that combined hormonal treatment with targeted anti-HER2 therapy in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer indicate that this novel dual-targeting strategy significantly improves outcomes compared with endocrine treatment alone. Nonetheless, other data suggest that it might achieve an inferior outcome compared with anti-HER2 therapy plus chemotherapy. Therefore, targeting both the HR and HER2 signaling pathways upfront might not be the most-effective therapeutic strategy in the management of HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. We discuss the clinical implication of resistance to endocrine therapy, and describe new insights into the management of HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer.     

Life following aromatase inhibitors--where now for endocrine sequencing?

The third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are challenging tamoxifen as treatments of choice for early and advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease. However, patients who initially respond to AIs eventually develop resistance to treatment and experience disease progression. To establish the optimal endocrine therapy following AI resistance, it is essential to understand the mechanisms that contribute to the loss of response. Data from in vitro models have suggested that acquired AI resistance is due to enhanced sensitization to low estrogen levels during long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED). Cross-talk between the ER and various growth-factor-receptor signaling pathways, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and the insulin-like growth factor pathway, may also be implicated. Therefore, endocrine therapies that abolish estrogen signaling via removal of the ER could be effective in patients with AI-resistant disease. Fulvestrant ('Faslodex') is a new ER antagonist with no agonist effects that binds, blocks and degrades the ER. Due to its unique mode of action and lack of cross-resistance with existing treatments, fulvestrant is an effective therapeutic agent for use in sequential endocrine regimens. Fulvestrant has established efficacy in tamoxifen-resistant disease and there is a growing body of evidence demonstrating its efficacy in patients with AI-resistant disease. In preclinical models, MCF-7 cells undergoing LTED are refractory to tamoxifen but sensitive to fulvestrant, suggesting fulvestrant is a more appropriate choice following AI resistance. The steroidal AI, exemestane is also an option in non-steroidal AI-resistant disease. Clinical trials are underway to compare fulvestrant with exemestane as an appropriate therapy following the onset of AI resistance.     

Management of Aromatase Inhibitor-Resistant Disease with Estrogen,Selective Estrogen Receptor Down-Regulators,and Other Agents

With increased use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the adjuvant and first-line metastatic settings for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, systemic relapse or progressive metastatic disease on AIs is an increasingly encountered clinical scenario. Overcoming resistance is a priority. Patients with AI-resistant disease represent a heterogeneous population, with diverse mechanisms of resistance dictating varied sensitivity to subsequent treatment. Cells with persistent dependence on ER signaling may be inhibited by fulvestrant, in which case dose-dependent ER downregulation and activity favor high-dose, loading schedule fulvestrant. In direct contrast, cells with long-term estrogen deprivation with adaptive estrogen hypersensitivity may be inhibited by exposure to estrogen. Cell survival by alternate growth signaling pathways may be inhibited by targeted agents. Currently missing, however, are predictive biomarkers to identify underlying resistance mechanisms and guide effective post-AI therapy for individual patients.     

乳腺癌内分泌治疗新药fulvestrant临床研究进展

Fulvestrant是一种新型雌激素受体(ER)阻滞剂,其降低乳腺癌细胞中ER水平的作用明显优于三苯氧胺(TAM).初步研究表明,在晚期乳腺癌治疗中,fulvestrant与现有的内分泌治疗药物间无交叉耐药,其疗效略优于TAM,至少与阿那曲唑等效且副作用较小,具有较广泛的应用前景.     

Fulvestrant in the management of postmenopausal women with advanced, endocrine-responsive breast cancer

Fulvestrant is a pure estrogen antagonist that binds, blocks and downgrades the estrogen receptor (ER). Its unique mechanism of action is its antitumor activity after progression on prior endocrine therapy. Fulvestrant has shown activity in ER-dependent cells that are ligand independent. Fulvestrant has been approved at 250 mg/month for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer after progression or recurrence on antiestrogen therapy. The fulvestrant 500 mg regimen has just received approval by the EMA and the US FDA, supported by dose-dependent ER downregulation and the recent results of the clinical trial CONFIRM. Fulvestrant in combination with systemic lowering of estrogen has shown no improvement over fulvestrant alone. Combination therapy with inhibitors of growth factor signaling may have greater efficacy and is under exploration. To enhance the benefit of fulvestrant and improve outcomes for individuals with ER-positive breast cancer, greater understanding of resistance mechanisms is required. A key issue is identification of patients with ER-positive disease who retain sensitivity to antiestrogen therapy after progression on tamoxifen and/or aromatase inhibitors.     

Fulvestrant regulates epidermal growth factor (EGF) family ligands to activate EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling in breast cancer cells

Estrogen receptor-α (ER) targeted therapies are routinely used to treat breast cancer. However, patient responses are limited by resistance to endocrine therapy. Breast cancer cells resistant to the pure steroidal ER antagonist fulvestrant (fulv) demonstrate increased activation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family members and downstream ERK signaling. In this study, we investigated the effects of fulv on EGFR signaling and ligand regulation in several breast cancer cell lines. EGFR/HER2/HER3 phosphorylation and ERK1,2 activation were seen after 24–48 h after fulvestrant treatment in ER-positive breast cancer cell lines. 4-Hydroxy-tamoxifen and estradiol did not cause EGFR activation. Fulvestrant did not affect EGFR expression. Cycloheximide abolished the ability of fulv to activate EGFR suggesting the autocrine production of EGFR ligands might be responsible for fulvestrant induced EGFR signaling. qRT-PCR results showed fulv differentially regulated EGFR ligands; HB-EGF mRNA was increased, while amphiregulin and epiregulin mRNAs were decreased. Fulvestrant induced EGFR activation and upregulation of EGFR ligands were ER dependent since fulv treatment in C4-12, an ER-negative cell line derivative of MCF-7 cells, did not result in EGFR activation or change in ligand mRNA levels. ER downregulation by siRNA induced similar EGFR activation and regulation of EGFR ligands as fulvestrant. Neutralizing HB-EGF antibody blocked fulv-induced EGFR activation. Combination of fulv and EGFR family tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib and lapatinib) significantly decreased EGFR signaling and cell survival. In conclusion, fulvestrant-activated EGFR family members accompanied by ER dependent upregulation of HB-EGF within 48 h. EGF receptor or ligand inhibition might enhance or prolong the therapeutic effects of targeting ER by fulvestrant in breast cancer.     

A new estrogen receptor antagonist--an overview of available data

Fulvestrant ('Faslodex'), a novel estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist with no known agonist effects that downregulates the ER, is the first in a new class of antiestrogen. Consequently, fulvestrant is not cross-resistant with other endocrine therapies. In previously untreated postmenopausal women, fulvestrant brought about dose-dependent reductions in ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) protein concentrations and produced no demonstrable estrogen agonist effect. Fulvestrant has demonstrated clinical benefit rates of 69% in postmenopausal women with advanced tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer. In two global phase III trials, fulvestrant was shown to be at least as effective as the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole with similar efficacy for time to progression, objective response and clinical benefit in patients progressing on prior endocrine therapy. Fulvestrant was also well tolerated and, similar to anastrozole, maintained a good quality of life. As a once-monthly intramuscular injection, administered during clinic visits, fulvestrant offers patient compliance advantages, making this new hormonal agent a viable therapeutic option for the palliative treatment of postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive advanced breast cancer.     

A Good Drug Made Better: The Fulvestrant Dose-Response Story

Sequential use of endocrine therapies remains the cornerstone of treatment for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer, before the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy for unresponsive disease. Fulvestrant is an estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist approved for the treatment of postmenopausal women with ER+ advanced breast cancer after failure of prior antiestrogen therapy. Initially approved at a monthly dose of 250 mg, the recommended fulvestrant dose was revised to 500 mg (500 mg/mo plus 500 mg on day 14 of month 1) after demonstration of improved progression-free survival versus fulvestrant 250 mg. We have reviewed the dose-dependent effects of fulvestrant, both from a retrospective combined analysis of dose-dependent reduction of tumor biomarkers in the presurgical setting (3 previously reported studies: Study 18, Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women with Estrogen-Sensitive Tumors, and Trial 57) and from a review of clinical studies for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Analysis of presurgical data revealed a consistent dose-dependent effect for fulvestrant on tumor biomarkers, with increasing fulvestrant dose resulting in greater reductions in ER, progesterone receptor, and Ki67 labeling index. The dose-dependent biological effect corresponds with the dose-dependent clinical efficacy observed in the treatment of advanced breast cancer after failure of prior antiestrogen therapy. Although it remains to be determined in a phase III trial, cross-trial comparisons suggest a dose-dependent relationship for fulvestrant as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. Overall, biological and clinical data demonstrate a strong dose-dependent relationship for fulvestrant, supporting the efficacy benefit seen with fulvestrant 500 mg over the 250 mg dose.     

Preclinical and clinical experience with fulvestrant (Faslodex) in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer

Fulvestrant (Faslodex) is a new type of estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that binds, blocks, and degrades the ER, leading to reduced expression of the progesterone receptor (PgR). Unlike the selective ER modulator tamoxifen, fulvestrant is devoid of any known agonist activity. Fulvestrant has a steroidal structure that competitively binds to the ER with an affinity much greater than that of tamoxifen. After binding to fulvestrant, degradation of the ER is accelerated, ultimately resulting in a reduction in cellular ER. Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated that a single intramuscular injection of fulvestrant results in a dose-dependent decrease in ER and PgR indices and in Ki-67 expression. At the approved 250 mg dose, the decrease in receptor positivity with fulvestrant treatment was greater than that with tamoxifen. Phase III clinical trials have demonstrated the clinical benefit of fulvestrant in the endocrine treatment of breast cancer. Among patients who progressed during adjuvant or first-line endocrine therapy, fulvestrant was at least as effective as anastrozole as second-line treatment for the primary endpoints of objective response and time to progression, and was well tolerated. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, a combined survival analysis from two Phase III studies has shown that fulvestrant may be considered similar to anastrozole for time to death (27.4 months versus 27.7 months, respectively). For the first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women, fulvestrant was shown to be active and well tolerated in a trial that compared fulvestrant 250 mg once monthly and tamoxifen 20 mg once daily. Treatment with fulvestrant has also demonstrated clinical efficacy among patients who progressed following treatment with tamoxifen followed by nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. The efficacy of fulvestrant in sequential endocrine therapy and in combination with other agents appears promising and active investigations are ongoing to explore the clinical potential of this novel antiestrogen.     

Advanced concepts in estrogen receptor biology and breast cancer endocrine resistance: implicated role of growth factor signaling and estrogen receptor coregulators

Estrogen receptor (ER), mediating estrogen-signaling stimuli, is a dominant regulator and a key therapeutic target in breast cancer etiology and progression. Endocrine therapy, blocking the ER pathway, is one of the most important systemic therapies in breast cancer management, but de novo and acquired resistance is still a major clinical problem. New research highlights the role of both genomic and nongenomic ER activities and their intimate molecular crosstalk with growth factor receptor and other signaling kinase pathways in endocrine resistance. These signaling pathways, when overexpressed and/or hyperactivated, can modulate both activities of ER, resulting in endocrine resistance. Thus, these signal transduction receptors and signaling molecules may serve as both predictive markers and novel therapeutic targets to circumvent endocrine resistance. Compelling experimental and clinical evidence suggest that the epidermal growth factor/HER2/neu receptor (EGFR/HER2) pathway might play a distinct role in endocrine resistance, and especially in resistance to selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as tamoxifen. Results from preclinical studies of treatment combinations with various endocrine therapy drugs together with several potent anti-EGFR/HER2 inhibitors are very promising, and clinical trials to see whether this new strategy is effective in patients are now ongoing.     

Endocrinology and hormone therapy in breast cancer: New insight into estrogen receptor-α function and its implication for endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer

Estrogen and its receptor (ER) are critical for development and progression of breast cancer. This pathway is targeted by endocrine therapies that either block ER functions or deplete ER's estrogen ligand. While endocrine therapies are very effective, de novo and acquired resistance are still common. Laboratory and clinical data now indicate that bidirectional molecular crosstalk between nuclear or membrane ER and growth factor receptor pathways such as HER2/neu is involved in endocrine resistance. Preclinical data suggest that blockade of selected growth factor receptor signaling can overcome this type of resistance, and this strategy is already being tested in clinical trials     

Alteration of Y-box binding protein-1 expression modifies the response to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) plays an important role in tumor progression and drug resistance. This study examined whether YB-1 is involved in the alteration of response to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells. MCF7 cells that stably expressed YB-1 (MCF7-YB-1) and vector control cells (MCF7-vector) were established. These cells were used to analyze the expression of the factors related to ER and growth factor receptor signaling pathways and responses to antiestrogens (tamoxifen and fulvestrant) and estrogen responsive element (ERE) activity. The effect of knocking down endogenous YB-1 expression was tested in wild-type MCF7 cells. In addition, the expression of YB-1 and the factors related to ER and growth factor receptor signaling pathways were evaluated in clinical breast cancers treated with preoperative chemotherapy. The expression of HER2, AIB1, p-Erk, and c-Myc was increased in MCF7-YB-1 cells. In contrast, knocking down of YB-1 decreased the expression of these factors but increased the expression of ERα in wild-type MCF7 cells. Furthermore, sensitivity to antiestrogens was decreased in the MCF7-YB-1 in comparison to that in MCF7-vector cells. The introduction of YB-1 into MCF7 cells inhibited apoptosis and cell cycle arrest at G1 phase induced by antiestrogens. In MCF7-YB-1 cells, the expression levels of p-Erk and c-Myc were continuously upregulated when cells were treated with either tamoxifen or fulvestrant. The ERE activity was reduced in MCF7-YB-1 cells in comparison to MCF7-vector cells, and the ERE activity in MCF7-YB-1 cells was inhibited by fulvestrant at a lower concentration than that which inhibited the ERE activity in MCF7-vector cells. In ER-positive clinical breast cancers treated with preoperative chemotherapy, significantly more number of specimens that showed increased or positive YB-1 expression after chemotherapy was positive for HER2 expression. These data suggest that alteration of YB-1 may modify the crosstalk between the ER pathway and HER2 pathway in ER-positive breast cancer cells, and consequently, may alter the response to endocrine therapy in ER-positive breast cancer cells.