Primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

The progressive phase of multiple sclerosis (MS) is the one most often associated with irreversible accumulation of disability. An important question remains about the place of primary progressive MS (PP-MS): does it form an integral part of the disease spectrum, or is it maybe a distinct entity? This question could apparently be very theoretical, but it is not, as patients with PP-MS remain orphans when regarding disease-modifying treatments. Thus, they are usually excluded from therapeutic trials. A clue to this question could be the comparison between the different MS subtypes with a progressive phase. We discuss here the clinical similarities and differences between secondary and primary progressive MS.     

Interferon beta in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Abstract Background and objective Observational studies may provide additional information about the behaviour of different drugs in the post-marketing period. We present the data from a cohort of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients treated with interferon beta (IFNβ-1b) at our MS clinic. Methods This was an independent, open-label, non-randomised, observational study. Within the period 1998 to 2005, all patients with SPMS who started therapy with IFNβ-1b at our centre were studied. Each patient was included in a follow-up protocol collecting demographic and baseline clinical data. Results We studied 146 SPMS patients with a median follow-up of 60 months. Over the total study period, 62.2% of patients had confirmed progression. The analysis of the time to con- firmed progression showed that patients with two or more relapses in the 2 years before IFNβ initiation, had a higher risk of disability increase than those patients with less than two relapses (p = 0.002). Multiple regression analysis showed disease activity in terms of relapses as the only factor to predict increase of disability during the follow-up period. A significant proportion of patients (36%) stopped treatment during the follow-up period. IFNβ was safe, although some unexpected adverse events were observed. Conclusions A higher disease activity before the beginning of treatment with IFNβ in SPMS patients with a given EDSS rank could identify those with faster disability progression after treatment initiation.     

T cell vaccination in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Four secondary progressive MS patients were vaccinated with bovine myelin-reactive irradiated T cell lines from their peripheral blood. Patients were followed for 30-39 months, and monitored for immunological responses toward the vaccine, and for their clinical characteristics. Two patients showed stable EDSS score over time, one patient showed improvement by one EDSS step, and in the remaining patient her EDSS advanced over time. After the second inoculation there was a progressive decline of circulating whole myelin-reactive T cells, MBP143-168, PLP104-117, and MOG43-55-peptide-reactive T cells. In contrast the frequency of tetanus toxoid-reactive T cells remained unchanged. T cell vaccination (TCV) was also associated with a decline of myelin-specific IL-2- and IFN-gamma-secreting T cells. Twelve T cell lines (TCL) that recognize the inoculates were isolated from the peripheral blood of two patients. Ten of these TCL were CD8(+) and lysed the inoculates in a MHC Class I restricted manner. The remaining two TCL were CD4(+), and lysed the inoculates by MHC Class II restricted cytolytic activity. All T cell lines lysed not only myelin-reactive T cells, but also TCL specific for MBP143-168, PLP104-117 and MOG43-55 peptides. Control TCL specific for tetanus toxoid were not lysed. Neutralizing anti-Fas mAb did not influence the killing. Moreover, culture supernatants from two TCL which produce IL-10, were able to block the proliferation of myelin protein-specific TCL. This effect was abrogated using mAbs specific for IL-10. The data obtained indicated that TCV using autologous irradiated bovine myelin-reactive T cells promotes an effective depletion of T cells reactive against different myelin antigens.     

Rapid onset mitoxantrone-induced cardiotoxicity in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Mitoxantrone is a recently approved drug for patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). However, cardiac side effects limit Mitoxantrone use in SPMS and its lifetime cumulative dose should not exceed 140 mg/m2. Additionally, Mitoxantrone is contraindicated for use in SPMS patients with a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of < or = 50%. The goal of this study was to monitor LVEF more frequently than ordinarily recommended since experience with Mitoxantrone use in SPMS patients is limited. An unexpected decline in LVEF in one of the SPMS patients being treated with Mitoxantrone prompted further investigation into this finding. In our clinic, 47 patients on Mitoxantrone were followed prospectively; 28 of 47 patients had received a minimum of three doses and underwent a repeat LVEF evaluation prior to their fourth dose of Mitoxantrone. Of these 28 patients, five of 28 (17.8%) had a significant decline in LVEF from baseline. It is suggested that more stringent cardiac monitoring guidelines than current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations be used to avert potential cardiac complications in SPMS patients on Mitoxantrone.     

Cognitive impairment in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

The aim of this study was to use neuropsychological data to characterize two subtypes of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in a large patient sample. We studied patients with primary-progressive MS (PPMS) and secondary-progressive MS (SPMS). A group of 121 MS patients (36 PPS, 85 SPMS) and 40 healthy controls were administered a brief battery of cognitive tests. Executive functioning, memory and attention were studied. Results demonstrate that PPMS patients exhibited slightly more impairment than patients with SPMS, although this difference is not significant (50% vs 37%). However, PPMS patients revealed a significantly poorer performance in verbal learning (p < 0.05) and in verbal fluency (p < 0.05). Whereas PPMS patients had significantly shorter disease durations (p < 0.05), there was no statistical difference in disability between both groups. We conclude from our study that cognitive deficits in progressive MS are frequent. Patients with PPMS tend to be more frequently and severely affected than SPMS patients. Our findings of high prevalence of cognitive involvement in PPMS have not been reported previously     

Health-related quality of life in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Common disability scales in multiple sclerosis (MS) are often weighted towards physical disability. Non-motor symptoms such as depression, fatigue and pain substantially influence wellbeing in MS. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures the broader impact of MS and might indicate less obvious disease burdens. We analysed HRQoL, using the Nottingham Health Profile Part I (NHP-I), among 345 secondary progressive MS (SPMS) patients participating in a randomized trial of interferon-beta1a (IFN-beta1a), 22 mug subcutaneously weekly, or matching placebo. The results did not reveal any beneficial effect of IFN-beta1a in any outcome measure. NHP-I sub- and sum scores were compared for 217 population controls and correlated with demographic and clinical disease variables. SPMS patients had lower NHP-I sum and all subscores than the controls. Patients experiencing disease progression reported worse NHP-I sum scores. Increased fatigue, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and Arm Index scores were independently associated with reduction in several NHP-I subscores. SPMS patients had significantly lower HRQoL than controls and physical disability (EDSS and Arm Index), disease progression and fatigue strongly influenced this. MS.     

Hopelessness ratings in relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

OBJECTIVE: Two recent randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trials of interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis have obtained hopelessness ratings using the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). One of these studies, the PRISMS trial, evaluated interferon beta-1a in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Another, the SPECTRIMS trial, evaluated the same medication in secondary progressive (SP) MS. The objective of this analysis was to compare levels of hopelessness in persons with RRMS and SPMS, and to describe changes over time in the clinical trial participants. METHOD: Raw data from each clinical trial was obtained from the sponsor of the trials (Serono). Median BHS ratings, and the proportions at or above the BHS cut-point of 10 were calculated over a two (PRISMS) or three (SPECTRIMS) year period. RESULTS: The analysis included n = 532 clinical trial participants. Ratings of hopelessness were higher in SPMS clinical trial participants (SPECTRIMS) than in the RRMS group (PRISMS) at baseline (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0035). Furthermore, ratings of hopelessness were higher during follow-up than at baseline, in the SPMS group (McNemar's exact probability,p = 0.0015), but not in the RRMS group (McNemar's exact probability,p = 0.65). Depression was strongly associated with hopelessness in both RRMS (z = 4.13, p < 0.001) and SPMS (z = 5.24, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hopelessness is associated with SPMS, and may increase over time in this group. Hopelessness may influence suicide risk in people with MS and may potentially have an impact on coping and quality of life. Additional research is necessary to define the clinical implications of hopelessness in persons with this condition.     

ESIMS--an ongoing clinical trial in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

The design of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, European-Canadian Study on IVIG treatment in multiple sclerosis-ESIMS- is described. Three hundred and eighteen multiple sclerosis patients with a secondary progressive course, are treated with monthly infusions of immunoglobulin 10% 1 g/kg bodyweight or with 0.1 g albumin/vial for 27 months. The primary efficacy parameter is the percentage of patients with a confirmed treatment failure in the EDSS scale and/or the Nine Hole Peg Test Secondary outcome measures are MRI T2 lesion load, Magnetization Transfer Imaging, and MRI brainatrophy measures. Documentation of health resource utilisation and ability to work will cover socio-economic aspects. Recruitment of patients was completed in October 1998. The clinical part of the trial will be completed in April 2001.     

Natalizumab and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: migrating towards safe adhesion molecule therapy in multiple sclerosis

Natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against alpha4beta1 integrin, was shown in clinical trials to dramatically reduce the relapse rate, development of new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions and progression of disability in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Following its expedited approval, sales of the drug were discontinued owing to the emergence of two cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but deadly viral infection of the central nervous system (CNS) associated with immunosuppression. Owing to the effect of natalizumab on central nervous system leukocyte recruitment, the emergence of PML has been attributed to diminished immunosurveillance. The lack of additional opportunistic or CNS infections among natalizumab-treated patients, however, suggests that alternate mechanisms may contribute to the infectious risk. This review examines how the inhibition of alpha4beta1-mediated adhesion might establish a unique milieu for the development of PML and how future approaches to selective adhesion molecule therapy in multiple sclerosis might avoid a similar fate.     

Clinical and imaging correlates of the multiple sclerosis impact scale in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

The association of pathology and neurological deficit with quality of life (QoL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is not fully understood. In this study, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of pathology—T1 and T2 lesion volume and ratio; active T2 lesion number; global and regional brain volume and atrophy; magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) for lesions, normal appearing grey and white matter (NAGM, NAWM); and spinal cord cross-sectional area—and measures of neurological disability (expanded disability status scale, EDSS), deficit (MS functional composite, MSFC) and inflammatory activity (relapse rate) were compared with the MS impact scale (MSIS-29), in participants in a trial of lamotrigine in secondary progressive MS. Data were collected from 118 people (85 female:33 male) aged 30–61 years (mean 50.6 years)—median EDSS 6.0 (range 4.0–7.5); mean disease duration 20.1 years (range 3–41)—at baseline and 2 years. Regression analysis was used to identify independently significant cross-sectional and longitudinal correlates of the physical (MSIS-phys) and psychological (MSIS-psych) components of the MSIS-29; longitudinal analysis using the 57 people in the placebo arm. The only independently significant correlate of MSIS-phys was 1/timed walk (TW) (p < 0.0001, R ² = 0.13; p = 0.047, R ² = 0.09); cross-sectionally the best model for MSIS-psych was the paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT-3) (p = 0.041) and T1-to-T2 lesion volume ratio (p = 0.009) (R ² = 0.13); longitudinally it was change in 1/TW (p = 0.007), mean NAWM MTR (p = 0.003) and NAGM peak height (p = 0.048) (R ² = 0.32). These data show that MRI measures and clinical measures do impact on quality of life, but the association is limited.     

Treatment of active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with treosulfan

Abstract Objective To study the safety and efficacy of treosulfan, a cytotoxic alkylating agent, in patients with active secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Background Treosulfan (L-threitol-1,4-bis(methanesulfonate)) is a bifunctional alkylating agent with a favorable profile of side effects, approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Treosulfan has previously been shown to reduce the severity of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis under pre-therapeutic and therapeutic conditions. In human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, treosulfan reduces proliferative capacity and increases apoptosis. Study design This is a nonrandomized, open label study conducted in two centers. Eleven patients with active secondary progressive MS that failed to or did not qualify for approved disease modifying drugs were treated with treosulfan for 1 year. Patients received intravenous infusions of 7 g/m² every 4 weeks for 3 months (cycles 1–4, induction phase) with a predefined one-step dose escalation, thereafter every 3 months for the following 9 months (cyles 5–7, maintainance phase). Cranial MRI was performed every 3 months, EDSS and MSFC as well as physical examination were assessed at each clinical visit. Results Treatment with treosulfan was safe and well tolerated. Nine of 11 patients remained on study drug over the complete treatment period and showed clinical stabilisation or improvement as determined by EDSS and MSFC. Two patients discontinued study drug because of leukocytopenia and withdrawal of consent, respectively. No clinical relapses were observed during the treatment period. Thus, the median number of relapses per year was reduced signifi- cantly by 1.5 (range –3 to 0), p < 0.016, compared to prestudy. Therapy with treosulfan lead to a clear reduction of MRI activity as revealed by a reduced number of Gd + enhancing lesions on T1 weighted images. The mean number and volume of T2 lesions remained unchanged over 1 year. Four out of 9 patients under treosulfan showed no detectable disease activity (no Gd enhancing lesions, no new or newly enlarging T2 lesions). Conclusions Application of treosulfan in MS was safe and well tolerated. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment in secondary progressive MS.     

Interferon beta 1a for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

This non-systematic review identified four randomised trials that have tested the efficacy of interferon beta in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Two were trials of interferon beta 1a (IFNb1a) and two of interferon beta 1b (IFNb1b). All have shown significant reductions in relapse rates and accumulation of new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions, but only one trial (of IFNb1b) showed significant slowing of disability progression. Post hoc analyses of these trials suggest that the differences in outcomes might be partly explained by the differences between the trials in the proportions of patients with relapsing disease. In one of the trials of IFNb1a (the SPECTRIMS trial), the hazard ratio for progression in the treated relapsing patients with relapses in the two pre-study years was 0.74 compared to placebo patients with pre-study relapses and 1.01 in the treated patients compared to the placebo patients without pre-study relapses. In the same trial, the treatment effects on MRI parameters were more marked in the patients who had recent pre-study relapses compared with those who had not. These observations have led to the recommendation in national guidelines that prescribing of IFNb in SPMS be limited to those patients who have had disabling relapses in the last 2 years. These conclusions should be reviewed when the full results of all four trials have been published.     

Immunologic therapy for secondary and primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is generally considered an immunemediated demyelinating disease, and treatments designed to modify the course of MS are immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory. Although most people with MS have a relapsing-remitting course initially, the majority will eventually experience a more gradual decline in neurologic function, termed secondary progressive MS. Some patients have gradual worsening from the beginning, termed primary progressive MS. Recent pathologic studies have revealed that axonal injury and neuronal degeneration are much more prominent in MS than previously recognized, and may be the explanation for the gradual decline in neurologic function that characterizes progressive MS. The results of several clinical trials in MS indicate that suppression of the immune-mediated inflammation may decrease the relapse rate in MS, but not stop the progressive loss of neurologic function. There are many promising approaches to this clinical dilemma, but none has been proven to be effective in stopping or retarding progressive MS. More well-designed, controlled, blinded, randomized clinical trials are needed to test these putative therapies. In the mean time, we should avoid subjecting patients to potentially dangerous and unproven regimens.