Alternating Bi-Weekly Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Refractory Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Pigment Epithelial Detachment*

Objective: To describe visual and anatomical outcomes following bi-weekly intravitreal ranibizumab/bevacizumab injections in eyes with refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and pigment epithelial detachment (PED). Design: Retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series. Participants: Eighteen patients diagnosed with neovascular AMD that were refractory to anti-VEGF therapy and received alternating biweekly ranibizumab/bevacizumab injections were included. Methods: Patients with neovascular AMD and PED that were refractory to at least 11 monthly ranibizumab or bevacizumab injections were included in this study at a large, single retina practice. Following inclusion, patients received four bi-weekly alternating ranibizumab/bevacizumab intravitreal injections. After completing a course of four bi-weekly injections, patients were treated with variable regimens of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. The primary outcomes of the study included change in visual acuity (VA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) at eight weeks follow-up. Results: Study eyes had previously received a mean of 22 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections. At enrollment, mean VA was 20/95 and mean CFT was 455?µm. After four bi-weekly anti-VEGF injections, mean VA improved to 20/65 (p?p?=?0.029). In patients with PED, there was a mean 27.9% reduction in height (p?=?0.046) at eight weeks’ follow-up. Conclusions: Four injections of bi-weekly alternating ranibizumab/bevacizumab improved visual acuity and reduced macular thickness in a number of patients with refractory neovascular AMD and PED.     

Ranibizumab treatment administered as needed for occult and minimally classic neovascular membranes in age-related macular degeneration

Purpose

To report the clinical experience of intravitreal ranibizumab administered as needed for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 41 patients (41 eyes) with occult and minimally classic neovascular membrane in AMD. Patients received intravitreal injections (0.5 mg) of ranibizumab and were monitored monthly for 12 months. Forty-one eyes were retreated at the discretion of the treating physician on an as-needed basis after the first injection, instead of initially giving three monthly injections. The main outcomes measured were change in mean visual acuity and central retinal thickness, and the total number of injections received by patients during the 12 months.

Results

At 12 months, the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity improved by 0.078 logMAR units (P = 0.046) and the mean central retinal thickness decreased by 85.7 ??m (P < 0.001). Thirty of 41 eyes (73.2%) avoided any loss of vision, and 20 eyes (48.8 %) showed improved visual acuity. A mean of 4.07 injections were given over the 12 months.

Conclusions

Ranibizumab administered on an as-needed basis may stabilize visual acuity in patients with neovascular AMD.     

Aflibercept Treatment for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Refractory to Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Purpose

To report the results of switching treatment to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Trap-Eye (aflibercept) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) refractory to anti-VEGF (ranibizumab and bevacizumab).

Methods

This is a retrospective study involving 32 eyes from 29 patients; 18 were cases of neovascular AMD and 14 were cases of PCV. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were evaluated.

Results

BCVA and CMT improved from 0.58 to 0.55 (p = 0.005) and from 404 to 321 µm (p < 0.001), respectively, after switching to aflibercept. The 14 eyes that received 6 or more aflibercept injections remained stable at 0.81 to 0.81 and 321 to 327 µm (p = 1.0, 0.29), respectively, after 3 aflibercept injections. The 10 eyes that received 3 or more bevacizumab injections after 3 or more aflibercept injections worsened, from 0.44 to 0.47 and from 332 to 346 µm (p = 0.06, 0.05), respectively. The results showed similar improvement of BCVA and CMT in neovascular AMD and PCV.

Conclusions

Aflibercept seems to be effective for improvement and maintenance of BCVA and CMT for neovascular AMD and PCV refractory to anti-VEGF. Switching from aflibercept back to bevacizumab treatment may not be a proper strategy.     

An optical coherence tomography-guided, variable dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To evaluate an optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided, variable-dosing regimen with intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Open-label, prospective, single-center, nonrandomized, investigator-sponsored clinical study. METHODS: In this two-year study, neovascular AMD patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (n = 40) and a central retinal thickness of at least 300 microm as measured by OCT were enrolled to receive three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (0.5 mg). Thereafter, retreatment with ranibizumab was performed if one of the following changes was observed between visits: a loss of five letters in conjunction with fluid in the macula as detected by OCT, an increase in OCT central retinal thickness of at least 100 microm, new-onset classic CNV, new macular hemorrhage, or persistent macular fluid detected by OCT at least one month after the previous injection of ranibizumab. RESULTS: At month 12, the mean visual acuity improved by 9.3 letters (P < .001) and the mean OCT central retinal thickness decreased by 178 microm (P < .001). Visual acuity improved 15 or more letters in 35% of patients. These visual acuity and OCT outcomes were achieved with an average of 5.6 injections over 12 months. After a fluid-free macula was achieved, the mean injection-free interval was 4.5 months before another reinjection was necessary. CONCLUSION: This OCT-guided, variable-dosing regimen with ranibizumab resulted in visual acuity outcomes similar to the Phase III clinical studies, but required fewer intravitreal injections. OCT appears useful for determining when retreatment with ranibizumab is necessary.     

Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab for the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion

AIM:To compare the efficacy of ranibizumab and bevacizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).METHODS:A retrospective study was conducted at a single academic institution. Eighty-one patients na?ve to anti-VEGF therapy with RVO and macular edema were identified. Twenty-six eyes were treated with ranibizumab, 33 eyes with bevacizumab, and 22 eyes with bevacizumab then switched to ranibizumab (crossover). The main outcome was change in visual acuity at 3 months, 6 months, and final visit.RESULTS:The mean visual acuity improved from 20/80 to 20/40 in the ranibizumab (R) group and from 20/125 to 20/60 in the bevacizumab (B) group (P=0.66). The mean change in central subfield thickness (CST) was -186 and -212μm, respectively (P=0.69). Mean time between injections was 94±21.1d in the R group and 103.8±10.5d in the B group (P=0.78). In the crossover group, mean initial visual acuity was 20/125, reached 20/60 at crossover, and remained 20/60 at conclusion (P=0.91).CONCLUSION:Both ranibizumab and bevacizumab are effective for the treatment of RVO and appear to have similar visual and anatomic outcomes. Changing treatments from bevacizumab to ranibizumab did not result in further gains in visual acuity.      

Switch to a single dose of aflibercept in bevacizumab nonresponders with AMD

ObjectiveThis study aimed to report on the efficacy of 1 dose of aflibercept in bevacizumab nonresponders.DesignThis was a retrospective, single-centre, interventional, noncomparative study.ParticipantsThis study retrospectively analyzed 23 patients with persistent intraretinal or subretinal fluid treated with 6 or more monthly bevacizumab injections.MethodsPatients were switched to 1 dose of aflibercept and afterward continued their therapy with bevacizumab for at least another 6 months. We performed spectral domain optical coherence tomography monthly and evaluated visual acuity, central retinal thickness, and photoreceptor defects. The main outcome measures were visual and anatomic outcome 1 and 6 months after administering aflibercept.ResultsVisual acuity significantly improved (p = 0.01) after the switch to aflibercept (from 0.39 to 0.49 Snellen). This improvement was stable for the remaining 6 months of the study (final visual acuity, 0.46 Snellen); 47% of patients experienced an improvement of at least 5 letters from baseline on a chart of the ETDRS type (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study). Central retinal thickness decreased from 521 µm to 446 µm (p = 0.01) and remained stable for the next 6 months (452 µm). Complete resolution of intraretinal and subretinal fluid was observed in 30% of eyes.ConclusionsIn bevacizumab nonresponders, switching to a single dose of aflibercept before continuing the therapy with bevacizumab improves visual outcome and anatomic results.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To report the change in visual acuity and central retinal thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after intravitreal injections of bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: A retrospective case series in a university-based practice evaluated patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to AMD. Patients received intravitreal injections (1.25 mg) of bevacizumab and were monitored monthly with determination of best-corrected ETDRS visual acuity and OCT for persistence of retinal thickening. Eyes were retreated on an "as needed" basis, defined by presence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid. Patients were monitored every 2 months to 3 months for persistence of angiographic leakage. RESULTS: Seventy-nine eyes of 74 consecutive patients received the initial injection of bevacizumab between August 1, 2005, and January 30, 2006. Sixty-eight eyes (86%) of 64 patients had at least 3 months of follow-up. Mean central retinal thickness +/- SD decreased from 304 +/- 83 microm at baseline to 237 +/- 105 microm at 3 months (P = 0.00002). Mean ETDRS visual acuity gained 4 letters from 20/100 at baseline to 20/80-1 at 3 months (P = 0.040). Twenty eyes (25%) appeared to have a sustained response to a single injection and did not require further injections through 3 months. Two patients had a potentially drug-related adverse event (ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction). No serious injection-related adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal bevacizumab injection affects a rapid decrease in retinal thickness to normal or near-normal levels and improvement in visual acuity in eyes with CNV due to AMD. The sustainability of changes in retinal thickness and visual acuity in response to bevacizumab treatment warrant further investigation and long-term follow-up.     

Retrospective study of an as required dosing regimen of intravitreal bevacizumab in neovascular age‐related macular degeneration in an Australian population

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) using an as required dosing regimen. Methods: A retrospective study of 210 patients (231 eyes) with choroidal neovascularization resulting from neovasacular AMD. Patients were treated with 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab at a vitreoretinal practice in Adelaide, South Australia. Patients were followed up at 2–4 weeks and then at 1‐month intervals; repeat injections were offered in the event of recurrence. Recurrence was defined as either a decrease of best‐corrected visual acuity or an increase in macular oedema, subretinal fluid or intraretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography, after complete or partial resolution in previous follow‐up visits. Patient data were collected for 12 months of follow up or until the patient's treatment was changed to ranibizumab. Results: Significant improvement in visual acuity and central retinal thickness was demonstrated at 1 month with an improvement of vision from logMAR equivalent 0.76 to 0.68 (P < 0.001) and a decrease of central retinal thickness from 306 µm to 244 µm (P < 0.001). This overall improvement was continued throughout the 12‐month follow‐up period; however, follow up was poor with 12‐month data available for only a small number of patients (7.8%). Ocular and systemic side‐effects were rare at 3.5% and 0.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Eyes with neovascular AMD treated with intravitreal bevacizumab for up to 12 months had significant functional and anatomical improvement. Further studies need to confirm the long‐term safety and efficacy of this treatment.     

Ranibizumab for treatment of choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short-term outcomes after intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) injection in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A review of data for consecutive patients who received intravitreal ranibizumab injection was conducted. The main outcome measures were mean visual acuity and central macular thickness at 3 months compared with those at baseline. Response to ranibizumab therapy was evaluated with particular attention to prior treatment with bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, Inc.). RESULTS: Mean baseline visual acuity of 231 eyes of 231 patients was 20/152, and 189 patients (81.8%) had undergone prior treatment, with 153 (65.4%) having received intravitreal bevacizumab. Mean visual acuity at 3 months, available for 203 patients (88%), was 20/126 (P = 0.004). Mean visual acuity for 98 patients treated with bevacizumab within 3 months before ranibizumab injection was 20/100 at baseline and 20/98 at 3 months (P = 0.35). Mean baseline central macular thickness was 278 microm for all patients and improved to 211 microm at 3 months (P < 0.001). Macular thickness decrease was noted irrespective of previous bevacizumab therapy. CONCLUSION: Ranibizumab therapy was associated with significant improvements in mean visual acuity and central macular thickness for the group of all patients. Patients who had received bevacizumab treatment within 3 months before initiating ranibizumab treatment had stability of, but no improvement in, visual acuity.     

Effects of Vitreomacular Traction on Ranibizumab Treatment Response in Eyes with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

PurposeTo investigate the effects of vitreomacular traction (VMT) on ranibizumab treatment response for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).MethodsA retrospective review of 85 eyes of 85 patients newly diagnosed with neovascular AMD was conducted. Patients were eligible if they had received more than three consecutive monthly ranibizumab (0.50 mg) treatments and ophthalmic evaluations. Patients were classified into a VMT (+) group or VMT (-) group according to optical coherence tomography imaging. Best corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness (CRT) measurements were obtained at three and six months after initial injection.ResultsOne month after the third injection, mean visual acuity (VA) increases of 6.36 and 9.87 letters were observed in the VMT (+) and VMT (-) groups, respectively. The corresponding mean CRT values decreased by 70.29 µm and 121.68 µm, respectively. A total 41 eyes were identified as eligible for a subsequent fourth injection; 71.1% of patients (27 eyes) in the VMT (+) group but only 29.8% of patients in the VMT (-) group needed a subsequent fourth injection. Follow-up was extended to six months for 42 of the 85 enrolled patients (49.4%). The trends in VA and optical coherence tomography were found to be maintained at six-month follow-up.ConclusionsVA and CRT appeared to be more improved after ranibizumab treatment in the VMT (-) group compared to the VMT (+) group. VMT might antagonize the effect of ranibizumab treatment in a subpopulation of AMD patients.     

比较雷珠单抗和贝伐珠单抗对新生血管AMD的疗效

目的：比较玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗与贝伐珠单抗对年龄相关性黄斑变性（ age-related macular degeneration, AMD）的疗效,治疗方案必要时采用。 方法：回顾性分析63例63眼（雷珠单抗治疗组35眼,贝伐珠单抗治疗组28眼）新确诊新生血管年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的资料。治疗12 mo后随访,分析比较两组患者的最佳矫正视力（ BCVA）和黄斑中心凹厚度（ CFT）。采用双尾t检验和单因素方差分析比较两组最佳矫正视力和黄斑中心凹厚度的变化。 结果：雷珠单抗治疗组35眼和贝伐珠单抗治疗组28眼均完成12 mo随访,并记录数据。雷珠单抗治疗组最佳矫正视力均值增加0.1 logMAR;相反,贝伐珠单抗治疗组最佳矫正视力均值下降0.06logMAR（P=0.01）。雷珠单抗治疗组13眼（37%）和贝伐珠单抗治疗组4眼（14%）最佳矫正视力至少增加0.3logMAR。雷珠单抗治疗组平均黄斑中心凹厚度减少41.6μm,贝伐珠单抗治疗组减少8.1μm（P=0.003）。两组平均注射次数是4.46次和4.11次（P〉0.05）。 结论：玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗组在视力和消水肿方面疗效优于贝伐珠单抗组。但是,两种药的疗效和安全性还需要随机的长期临床试验来验证。     

6-weekly bevacizumab versus 4-weekly ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a 2-year outcome

AIM: To compare visual acuity and central macular thickness (CMT) changes in neovascular age related macular degeneration patients treated with either 6 weekly bevacizumab regimen or 4 weekly ranibizumab on an as required basis. METHODS: Patients made an informed choice between bevacizumab 1.25 mg or ranibizumab 0.5 mg. The selected treatment was administered in the first 3 visits. Bevacizumab patients were followed-up 6 weekly and ranibizumab 4 weekly. Retreatment criteria was based on the reduction of >5 letters in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the presence of retinal fluid on optical coherence tomography (OCT) or new retinal haemorrhage. RESULTS: Visual acuity at 2y bevacizumab patients gained 7.0 letters and ranibizumab 9.2 (P=0.31, 95% CI -6.4 to 2.0). At 2y 86% of bevacizumab and 94% ranibizumab patients had not lost 15 letters or more (P=0.13). Mean CMT decreased at 2y bevacizumab by 146 µm, ranibizumab 160 µm (P=0.72). Mean number of injections was at 2y bevacizumzb 11.9, ranibizumab 10.3 (P=0.023). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab 6 weekly on an as required basis was not demonstrably non-inferior to ranibizumab 4 weekly pro re nata (prn) in terms of BCVA and change in CMT. In the bevacizumab group, one more injection was required in the second year compared to the ranibizumab group.     

Rescue effects of intravitreal aflibercept in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration

We report the rescue results of intravitreal aflibercept in patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We retrospectively analyzed eyes with neovascular AMD resistant to posterior subtenon triamcinolone, intravitreal ranibizumab, and/or bevacizumab treatment in a tertiary medical center in middle Taiwan between December 2013 and October 2014. We then switched treatment to 2.0 mg aflibercept. The main outcome included changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography during monthly follow-up. There were 204 patients with neovascular AMD, and the percentage of refractory cases was 1.96% (4 of 204 cases). Our study included five eyes of four patients that were resistant to multiple treatments and subsequently switched to aflibercept. The mean age was 71.25 ± 11.09 years (range 57–83 years). Treatments were on average 6.6 times previously. Upon switching to aflibercept treatment, the average central foveal thickness on optical coherence tomography was 505.6 ± 270.86 μm (range 150–815 μm). After aflibercept treatment, the average central foveal thickness was 192 ± 51.76 μm (range 149–274 μm). All patients showed anatomic improvement, and 80% of the eyes (4 of 5 eyes) had improved best-corrected visual acuity and 20% of the eyes (1 of 5 eyes) had stable visual acuity. Patients tolerated the treatment well without serious adverse events. This short-term study showed that intravitreal aflibercept was effective and safe in treatment-resistant neovascular AMD cases. However, analysis of more cases and long-term follow-ups are mandatory.     

Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab after unresponsive treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab

Objective: To evaluate visual outcomes of eyes with choroidal neovascular membrane secondary to age-related macular degeneration that were initially treated with intravitreal ranibizumab then switched to intravitreal bevacizumab due to treatment failure.Design: Retrospective chart review.Participants: Fifty eyes of 50 patients presenting to the Barnes Retina Institute.Methods: Patients unresponsive to treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab were switched to intravitreal bevacizumab. Main outcome measures included number of intravitreal injections, visual acuity (VA), and resolution of leakage. Mean follow-up was 6 months after the final intravitreal bevacizumab injection. On average, each patient received 3.5 ranibizumab injections and 2.5 bevacizumab injections. Each patient received an average of 6 injections.Results: Resolution of leakage on fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography was achieved in 44 eyes (88%). Initial VA ranged from 20/30 to counting fingers (CF) (median VA 20/125). Final VA ranged from 20/20 to CF (median VA 20/100). Change in VA varied from loss of 2 lines to gain of 4 lines, but overall, remained stable (average gain 0.3 lines). Eighteen eyes (36%) had afinal VA of ≥ 20/50 and 18 eyes (36%) had a final VA of ≤ 20/200.Conclusions: Treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab may be effective, as measured by visual and anatomic criteria, in patients who are unresponsive to treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab.     

Three-year visual and anatomic results of administrating intravitreal bevacizumab in inflammatory ocular neovascularization

ObjectiveTo assess the 3-year visual outcome of intravitreal bevacizumab in inflammatory ocular neovascularization.DesignExperimental study.MethodsRetrospective multicenter consecutive case series in 81 patients with inflammatory ocular neovascularization refractory to standard therapy and treated with intravitreal bevacizumab. The outcome measures included improvement of best corrected visual acuity expressed as logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and paired comparison decrease in central foveal thickness by optical coherence tomography.ResultsMean best corrected visual acuity improved from baseline 0.699 (6/30 or 20/101) (SD 0.434) to 0.426 (6/16 or 20/53) (SD 0.428) (n = 81; p < 0.001), a gain of 2.7 lines (median 3 injections; 81 eyes; 81 patients). Paired comparisons revealed significant central foveal flattening at 3 years of 97.9 μm (n = 51; p < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, visual improvement was significant for ocular histoplasmosis (p = 0.026); multifocal choroiditis (p = 0.05); serpiginous choroiditis (p = 0.028); ocular toxoplasmosis (p = 0.042); and punctate inner choroidopathy (p = 0.015). In a subgroup analysis, foveal flattening was significant for ocular histoplasmosis (p = 0.004); multifocal choroiditis (p = 0.007); serpiginous choroiditis (p = 0.011); and punctate inner choroidopathy (p = 0.001). Of the group, 5 eyes developed submacular fibrosis, 1 eye retinal pigment epithelial tear, and 1 eye macular ischemia in the context of vasculitis.ConclusionAt 3 years, intravitreal bevacizumab sustained significant visual improvement of 2.7 lines and significant foveal flattening of 98 μm in a wide variety of inflammatory ocular diseases without major complications after a median of 3 injections.     

Morphological changes in spectral domain optical coherence tomography guided bevacizumab injections in wet age-related macular degeneration, 12-months results

Purpose:

To describe retinal changes during Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) guided bevacizumab treatment for neovascular age- related macular degeneration (AMD).

Settings and Design:

Single center observational study.

Materials and Methods:

We confirmed wet AMD in 47 eyes of 45 patients by fluorescein angiography and SD-OCT. After bevacizumab injection, we examined the patients at 4-week intervals. During each follow-up control, we performed SD-OCT and a complete ophthalmic examination. Criteria for reinjection were visual acuity loss of more than five ETDRS letters, and/or increase of central retinal thickness, sub-retinal fluid, intra-retinal fluid, pigment epithelium detachment. If reinjection criteria were not met, we advised the patient to return in 4 weeks’ time for the next scheduled follow-up. We used 3-dimensional SD-OCT to measure photoreceptor defects and sub-retinal fibrosis. The main efficacy endpoints were the SD-OCT measurements of the size of photoreceptor defects, the size of external membrane defects and the central retinal thickness.

Results:

Over the 12 months study period, the percentage of scans in 3-D imaging mode showing visible defects of the junction between inner and outer segments of photoreceptors increased from 38.96 to 53.8%. The percentage of scans in 3-D imaging mode with visible sub-retinal fibrosis increased from 33 to 52% and mean central retinal thickness decreased from 333 μm (96-900 μm) to 272 μm (P = 0.011).

Conclusion:

In long-term anti- Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for neovascular AMD, photoreceptor defects and fibrosis progress despite a decrease in central retinal thickness and improvements in visual acuity. We would encourage further discussion as to whether this is the natural course of the disease or a result of the treatment.     

Switch of anti-VEGF agents is an option for nonresponders in the treatment of AMD

Background

Although anti-VEGF therapy of exudative AMD with bevacizumab and ranibizumab proved efficacious in the majority of patients, CNV activity does not respond to continued treatment after repeated injections in a considerable amount of patients. These are referred to as nonresponders. A change of the drug to bevacizumab or ranibizumab could possibly offer an alternative option for the treatment of nonresponding exudative AMD.

Methods and materials

A total of 138 nonresponders who switched therapy from bevacizumab to ranibizumab (n=114) or vice versa (n=24) were included in a retrospective study. Visual acuity (VA) and foveal thickness before and after the switch of therapy were compared. By means of linear regression analysis, we analyzed possible prognostic factors associated with a favorable outcome for visual acuity.

Results

Linear regression analysis revealed a statistically significant benefit for nonresponders when treatment was changed to a different anti-VEGF drug (bevacizumab or ranibizumab). VA at the time of the switch was positively correlated with a beneficial development of VA after changing the drug. There was no significant correlation with age, macular thickness, number of injections before the switch, or the development of VA under treatment before the switch. Both patients switching to Avastin and Lucentis benefitted without statistically significant differences.

Conclusions

An exchange of bevacizumab with ranibizumab or vice versa should be considered in nonresponders in the treatment of exudative AMD. Further prognostic factors may help to identify patients who might benefit from a switch. These factors should be investigated in further studies.     

Delay between medical indication to anti-VEGF treatment in age-related macular degeneration can result in a loss of visual acuity

Background  

Complicated approval procedures and limited short-term surgical capacities can result in time delays between the definition of a medical indication for ranibizumab treatment in active neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and the starting of treatment. This study aimed to evaluate changes in visual acuity and central retinal thickness over time, and their consequences for the patients concerned.     

Bevacizumab and ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: an updated meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Purpose

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the main cause of central vision loss among individuals aged 50 years or older in developed countries. The aim of this study was to review systematically the effect of bevacizumab compared to ranibizumab in patients with AMD at 1 year.

Methods

A systematic review was performed on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library and Trial registers to October 2013. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies were randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing bevacizumab with ranibizumab in patients with neovascular AMD. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) estimates were synthesized under fixed- and random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q statistic and I².

Results

Five RCTs were included, representing 2,686 randomised patients. The meta-analysis confirmed the non-inferiority of bevacizumab compared to ranibizumab for change in visual acuity at 1 year (MD 0.57 letters, ?1.80 to 0.66, p?=?0.37, I²?=?0 %). Better anatomical results were found for ranibizumab. Bevacizumab was associated with a 34 % increase in the number of patients with at least one serious systemic adverse event (OR 1.34, 1.08 to 1.66, p?=?0.01, I²?=?0 %).

Conclusions

The pooled evidence confirmed that, compared with ranibizumab, bevacizumab was associated with equivalent effects on visual acuity at 1 year and with a higher risk of systemic serious adverse events. The current available data do not show which types of adverse events occur more frequently. In practice, bevacizumab should be used under a risk-management plan until further studies have been carried out to assess accurately the increased risk of systemic adverse events.     

Cambio a ranibizumab en edema macular diabético refractario al tratamiento con bevacizumab

Aim

To determine the efficacy of switching to ranibizumab in patients with diabetic macular oedema refractory to treatment with bevacizumab, and to evaluate the outcomes when switching back to bevacizumab.