Azathioprine and mesalamine for prevention of relapse after conservative surgery for Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Because the reoperation rate for Crohn's disease is high after resective surgery, use of conservative surgery has increased. Mesalamine was investigated for the prevention of postoperative relapse, with disappointing results. The role of azathioprine in the postoperative setting is unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of azathioprine and mesalamine in the prevention of clinical and surgical relapse in patients who have undergone conservative surgery for Crohn's disease. METHODS: In a prospective, open-label, randomized study, 142 patients received azathioprine (2 mg. kg -1. day -1 ) or mesalamine (3 g/day) for 24 months. Clinical relapse was defined as the presence of symptoms with a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score >200 and surgical relapse as the presence of symptoms refractory to medical treatment or complications requiring surgery. RESULTS: After 24 months, the risk of clinical relapse was comparable in the azathioprine and mesalamine groups, both on intention-to-treat (odds ratio [OR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-4.67) and per-protocol analyses (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 0.80-3.97). No difference was observed with respect to surgical relapse at 24 months between the 2 groups. In a subgroup analysis, azathioprine was more effective than mesalamine in preventing clinical relapse in patients with previous intestinal resections (OR, 4.83; 95% CI, 1.47-15.8). More patients receiving azathioprine withdrew from treatment due to adverse events than those receiving mesalamine (22% vs. 8%; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: While no difference was observed in the efficacy of azathioprine and mesalamine in preventing clinical and surgical relapses after conservative surgery, azathioprine is more effective in those patients who have undergone previous intestinal resection.     

Prophylaxis of postoperative relapse in Crohn's disease with mesalamine: European Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study VI

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study investigated if long-term treatment with high-dose mesalamine reduces the risk of clinical relapse of Crohn's disease after surgical resection. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, 4 g of mesalamine (Pentasa; Ferring A/S, Vanlose, Denmark) daily was compared with placebo in 318 patients. Treatment was started within 10 days after resective surgery and continued for 18 months. Primary outcome parameter was clinical relapse as defined by an increase in Crohn's Disease Activity Index, reoperation, septic complication, or newly developed fistula. Risk factors for recurrence were prospectively defined to be analyzed in a stepwise proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Cumulative relapse rates (+/-SE) after 18 months were 24.5% +/- 3.6% and 31.4% +/- 3.7% in the mesalamine (n = 152) and placebo (n = 166) groups, respectively (P = 0.10, log-rank test, 1-sided). Retrospective analysis showed a significantly reduced relapse rate with mesalamine only in a subgroup of patients with isolated small bowel disease (n = 124; 21.8% +/- 5.6% vs. 39.7% +/- 6.1%; P = 0.02, log-rank test). Probability of relapse was predominantly influenced by the duration of disease (P = 0.0006) and steroid intake before surgery (additional risk, P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: Eighteen months of mesalamine, 4 g daily, did not significantly affect the postoperative course of Crohn's disease. Some relapse-preventing effect was found in patients with isolated small bowel disease.     

Quality of life rapidly improves with budesonide therapy for active Crohn's disease. Canadian Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group

Our aims were to assess the impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of a controlled ileal release (CIR) formulation of budesonide in active Crohn's disease (CD) and further define the role of HRQOL, using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), in assessing outcome in CD. A randomized trial was conducted in 258 patients with active ileal or ileocecal CD. Budesonide CIR 1.5 mg, 4.5 mg, 7.5 mg, or placebo was given b.i.d. for 8 weeks. IBDQ score changes were compared among groups. Correlations for IBDQ and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores were calculated. Mean IBDQ scores improved significantly over placebo by 2 weeks in budesonide 15 mg (155+/-38; p = 0.006) and 9 mg groups (157+/-33; p = 0.0002). Bowel, systemic, social, and emotional subscores were also significantly better (p < 0.002) at 2 and 8 weeks in the 9 mg group. Improved HRQOL scores correlated well with decreased CDAI (-0.8 < r < -0.4). Average per item change in IBDQ at remission was 1.17 to 1.48. Prior surgery (p < 0.005) or current smoker (p < 0.05) status predicted poorer initial HRQOL but not response. Budesonide CIR 9 or 15 mg/day rapidly and significantly improved HRQOL in active CD.     

Relationship between clinical features of Crohn's disease and the risk of developing extraintestinal manifestations

OBJECTIVES: Crohn's disease is frequently associated with extraintestinal manifestations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of association between the development of extraintestinal manifestations, the clinical forms of Crohn's disease according to the Vienna Classification and to the presence of several potential risk factors of the disease. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-three consecutive Crohn's disease patients were studied. Sex, smoking habits, previous Crohn's disease-related surgery, family history of Crohn's disease, steroid dependency, steroid resistance and the presence of at least one mutant allele in any of the three considered variants of CARD15 gene were considered as potential risk factors. The Vienna Classification was applied, and the presence of extraintestinal manifestations was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 61 (35.3%) patients developed extraintestinal manifestations. They were more frequently seen in women than in men (41.1 vs. 26.7%), (odds ratio 1.92, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-3.70; P=0.05) and in steroid-dependent patients than in steroid responders (61.1 vs. 28.5%), (odds ratio 3.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.83-8.49; P<0.01). No relationship was found in general between the extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease and smoking habits, previous Crohn's disease-related surgery, a family history of Crohn's disease, steroid resistance and CARD15 mutations. Such relationships were, however, detected for some individual extraintestinal manifestations as between both smoking habits (odds ratio 9.09, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-71.66; P<0.05) and the G908R CARD15 mutation (odds ratio 4.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.11-20.43; P<0.05), respectively, and erythema nodosum. Patients with any colonic involvement of Crohn's disease (L2+L3) suffered from extraintestinal manifestations of the disease more frequently than patients without colonic involvement (42.7 vs. 25.9%, respectively; odds ratio 2.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-4.07; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Female gender, steroid-dependency and colonic involvement are associated with the risk of developing extraintestinal manifestations of Crohn's disease.     

Initial therapy for mild to moderate Crohn's disease: mesalamine or budesonide?

The initial choice of therapy for mild to moderately active Crohn's disease is controversial. Both the National Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study (NCCDS) and the European Cooperative Crohn's Disease Study (ECCDS) demonstrated that sulfasalazine is effective for the induction of remission. Subsequent studies of new mesalamine formulations showed inconsistent results; two trials, however, demonstrated a statistically significant improvement with Pentasa and Asacol treatment, and meta-analyses suggest a modest benefit of mesalamine maintenance therapy. The NCCDS and ECCDS trials found that corticosteroid therapy is much more effective than sulfasalazine for induction of remission, but corticosteroids did not show maintenance benefits. Corticosteroid use is frequently associated with adverse effects, and the majority of patients treated with prednisone become either steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent; many of these patients ultimately need treatment with immunosuppressives and/or surgery. Budesonide, a topical corticosteroid with high first-pass hepatic metabolism, is slightly less effective in inducing remission than conventional corticosteroids but is significantly less likely to cause side effects. Budesonide 9 mg/day was shown to be more effective than mesalamine (Pentasa 4 g/day) for induction therapy, but budesonide has been ineffective as a maintenance therapy. Mesalamine may be useful for patients with more extensive disease, those intolerant of sulfasalazine, or those with contraindications or intolerance to budesonide. Alternatively, sulfasalazine is effective in the presence of colonic disease. Clinicians must decide on the basis of the existing evidence whether budesonide or mesalamine is the preferred initial therapy for active Crohn's disease.     

Mesalamine in the treatment of mild to moderate active Crohn's ileitis: results of a randomized, multicenter trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalamine) in the treatment of flare-ups of Crohn's disease is controversial. In previous studies, different locations and pathological behavior of Crohn's disease could have obscured the efficacy of these drugs that deliver their substance in different intestinal sites. The present study tested two different mesalamine formulations with 6-methylprednisolone in mild to moderate active Crohn's ileitis. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with Crohn's ileitis (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI], 180-350) were randomly assigned to receive for 12 weeks mesalamine tablets, 4 g (35 patients); mesalamine microgranular preparation, 4 g (28 patients); and 6-methylprednisolone, 40 mg (31 patients). Mesalamine microgranular preparation was a gelatin capsule containing 400 mg of mesalamine microgranules coated with Eudragit S, which has been shown to deliver the drug in the terminal ileum. RESULTS: Patients taking mesalamine tablets experienced a decrease of CDAI median score value of 113.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 33-149) compared with 123 (95% CI, 77-155) in the mesalamine microgranular group and 154 (95% CI, 99-197) in the 6-methylprednisolone group (P = 0.07 [NS]). Remission at the final visit occurred in 19 of 31 (61%) patients taking steroids compared with 21 of 35 (60%) patients taking mesalamine tablets and 22 of 28 (79%) patients taking microgranular mesalamine (NS). Five patients on steroids were withdrawn because of side effects, and a case of pancreatitis was related to microgranular mesalamine. CONCLUSIONS: Mesalamine in microgranular formulation seems to be equally as effective as a standard dosage of steroids in the treatment of the mild to moderate form of Crohn's ileitis.     

Maintenance treatment with budesonide 6 mg versus 9 mg once daily in patients with Crohn's disease in remission

BACKGROUND: In previous trials, budesonide 6 mg/day was able to prolong the time to relapse in patients with quiescent Crohn's disease and budesonide 9 mg/day was effective in active disease with limited side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of budesonide 9 mg vs 6 mg once daily on the maintenance of remission and occurrence of adverse events. METHODS: Double-blind, randomised trial in patients with Crohn's disease in remission. Patients were randomised to receive 6 mg/day or 9 mg/day of budesonide (Budenofalk) without concomitant treatment for Crohn's disease. Endpoints were the time to relapse and relapse rates after one year. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were randomised to 6 mg/day and 81 patients to 9 mg/day. Survival analysis showed no differences in the time to relapse. One-year relapse rates were not significantly different (6 mg group 24%; 9 mg group 19%). Any adverse event was reported in 61 and 68% of patients in the 6 mg and 9 mg groups, respectively; none of the 12 serious adverse events were drug related. CONCLUSION: The one-year relapse rates were low and not significantly different between the group of patients treated with budesonide 6 mg vs 9 mg/day. Also, time to relapse and the number of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups.     

Low dose oral pH modified release budesonide for maintenance of steroid induced remission in Crohn's disease

Background—The relapse rate after steroid inducedremission in Crohn's disease is high.
Aims—To test whether oral pH modified releasebudesonide (3 × 1 mg/day) reduces the relapse rate and to identifypatient subgroups with an increased risk of relapse.
Methods—In a multicentre, randomised, doubleblind study, 179 patients with steroid induced remission of Crohn'sdisease received either 3 × 1 mg budesonide (n=84) or placebo (n=95)for one year. The primary study aim was the maintenance of remission ofCrohn's disease for one year.
Results—Patient characteristics at study entrywere similar for both groups. The relapse rate was 67% (56/84) in thebudesonide group and 65% (62/95) in the placebo group. The relapsecurves in both groups were similar. The mean time to relapse was 93.5days in the budesonide group and 67.0 days in the placebo group. Noprognostic factors allowing prediction of an increased risk for relapseor definition of patient subgroups who derived benefit from low dosebudesonide were found. Drug related side effects were mild and nodifferent between the budesonide and the placebo group.
Conclusion—Oral pH modified release budesonide ata dose of 3 × 1 mg/day is not effective for maintaining steroidinduced remission in Crohn's disease.

Keywords:budesonide; Crohn's disease; maintenance ofremission

     

Combined budesonide and antibiotic therapy for active Crohn's disease: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although antibiotics are frequently used to treat Crohn's disease, this practice is not supported by strong evidence from randomized trials. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind multicenter study of patients with active Crohn's disease of the ileum, right colon, or both. Patients were randomized to receive oral ciprofloxacin and metronidazole, both 500 mg twice daily, or placebo for 8 weeks. All patients received oral budesonide 9 mg once daily. The primary efficacy measure was the proportion of patients in remission at week 8. RESULTS: Of the 134 patients who were randomized, 130 were evaluated for efficacy; 66 received placebo, and 64 received antibiotics. At week 8, 21 patients (33%) assigned to antibiotics were in remission as compared with 25 patients (38%) in the placebo group (P = 0.55; absolute difference, -5%; 95% confidence interval, -21% to 11%). An interaction (P = 0.025) between treatment allocation and disease location on treatment response was identified. Among patients with disease of the colon, 9 of 17 (53%) were in remission after treatment with antibiotics, compared with 4 of 16 (25%) of those who received placebo (P = 0.10). Discontinuation of therapy because of adverse events occurred in 13 of 66 (20%) patients treated with antibiotics, compared with 0 of 68 in the group who received placebo (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active Crohn's disease of the ileum, the addition of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole to budesonide is an ineffective intervention, but this antibiotic combination may improve outcome when there is involvement of the colon.     

A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Probiotics for Maintenance of Remission and Prevention of Clinical and Endoscopic Relapse in Crohn’s Disease

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether probiotics maintain remission in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). DESIGN: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. METHODS: PUBMED and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for clinical trial studies investigated the efficacy of probiotics for the maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease. Clinical relapse and endoscopic relapse were the key outcomes of interest. Data were searched within the time period of 1966 through May 2007. RESULT: Eight randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials met our criteria and were included in the analysis. Seven determined clinical relapse and three evaluated endoscopic relapse among patients with CD received probiotics for maintenance of remission. Pooling of seven trials for the outcome of clinical relapse yielded an odds ratio of 0.92 (95% confidence interval of 0.52-1.62, P = 0.8853), a nonsignificant odds ratio. The odds ratio for three studies for the outcome of endoscopic relapse was 0.97 (95% confidence interval of 0.54-1.78, P = 0.93), a nonsignificant odds ratio. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis fails to demonstrate the efficacy of probiotics in maintaining remission and preventing clinical and endoscopic recurrence in CD. It is suggested to use probiotic preparations containing a mixture of lactobacillus with E. coli or Saccharomyces.     

The long-term efficacy of azathioprine does not wane after four years of continuous treatment in patients with steroid-dependent luminal Crohn’s disease

BackgroundThe long-term effectiveness of azathioprine, in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients remains a matter of debate. This study aims at assessing the effectiveness and safety of azathioprine in patients treated continuously for less or more than 4 years.MethodsPatients with steroid-dependent Crohn’s disease in remission on azathioprine (2–2.5 mg/kg) for between 2 and 8 years were assigned into two groups. Patients in Group A were being treated continuously for 2 to 4 years whereas patients in Group B for 4 to 8 years. Patients were followed every month for 1 year with physical examination and laboratory tests. Compliance with treatment was also assessed every month. Every 3 months the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was calculated and the quality of life (QOL) Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was completed. Colonoscopy with calculation of the Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) was performed at baseline and at the end of the study. The primary end point was relapse after 1 year. Secondary end points were safety of treatment, QOL, and endoscopic healing.ResultsFifty-eight patients were included in Group A and 42 in Group B. The relapse rates per protocol were 19.6% and 11.9%, respectively (p: not significant). There were no significant differences overall and at each time point of the study between the two treatment groups regarding compliance with and safety of treatment, CDAI, IBDQ, and CDEIS scores. Multifactorial analysis did not identify any factor influencing the remission of disease in any patient group.ConclusionsLong-term treatment with azathioprine of steroid-dependent Crohn’s disease is efficacious and safe.     

Risk and significance of endoscopic/radiological evidence of recurrent Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the risk of endoscopic/radiological recurrence of Crohn's disease postoperatively and the long-term outcome. METHODS: A randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed to determine the effectiveness of mesalamine in preventing recurrent Crohn's disease postoperatively. Patients in the control group were examined endoscopically/radiologically before entry into and annually during the trial. Findings were classified as minimal or severe. RESULTS: There were 76 patients (49 men and 37 women; mean age, 37.1 +/- 13.2 years). Fifty (61.7%) had terminal ileal resections. Overall, 55 endoscopic/radiological recurrences were observed in 51 patients (67.1%). Expressed actuarially, the recurrence rate was 27.5% at 1 year (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.8%-37.6%), 60.8% at 2 years (95% CI, 46%-71.3%), and 77.3% at 3 years (95% CI, 62.7%-86.3%). Nineteen (37%) were symptomatic and 12 (24%) were initially asymptomatic but later became symptomatic (mean, 13.0 +/- 8.8 months), whereas 20 (39%) remained asymptomatic (mean, 16.9 +/- 17.4 months). Patients with severe endoscopic/radiological disease were significantly more likely to be or become symptomatic than those with minimal disease (23 of 32 vs. 8 of 19, respectively; P = 0.0437). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that postoperative endoscopic/radiological recurrences occur later than previously reported. Furthermore, many of these patients, especially with minimal disease, will remain asymptomatic. (Gastroenterology 1997 Dec;113(6):1823-7)     

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (Asacol) in the maintenance treatment of Crohn's disease. The Italian IBD Study Group.

A randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a delayed-release formulation of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) (Asacol; Giuliani & Bracco, Milan, Italy) for prevention of clinical relapse in 125 patients with inactive Crohn's disease. Patients in remission [Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) less than 150] between 3 months and 2 years were randomly allocated to receive either 800 mg 5-ASA three times daily (n = 64) or placebo (n = 61) for up to 12 months or until relapse of symptoms. Relapse was defined by a CDAI greater than 150, with a minimum increase of 100 points over the baseline value. The cumulative relapse rates were 12% in the 5-ASA group and 22% in the placebo group at 3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference, -4 to 24]; 28% and 41%, respectively, at 6 months (95% CI, -4 to 30); and 34% and 55%, respectively, at 12 months (95% CI, 3-39; P = 0.02, log rank test). Significant decrease in the risk of relapse was found in patients with ileitis, in those with previous bowel resection and, in those with prolonged prestudy remission. Eight patients (5 on 5-ASA, 3 on placebo) withdrew from the study because of adverse reactions, but no major clinical or laboratory adverse effect was observed. It is concluded that oral 5-ASA coated with Eudragit S (Rohn Pharma GmbH, Wieterstadt, Germany), 2.4 g daily, is safe and seems superior to placebo in preventing or delaying clinical relapse in Crohn's disease, especially in milder cases and in ileal disease.     

Induction and maintenance infliximab therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease in children

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The REACH study evaluated the safety and efficacy of infliximab in children with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. METHODS: Patients (n = 112) with a Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) score >30 received infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Patients responding to treatment at week 10 were randomized to infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 or 12 weeks through week 46. A concurrent immunomodulator was required. Clinical response (decrease from baseline in the PCDAI score > or =15 points; total score < or =30) and clinical remission (PCDAI score < or =10 points) were evaluated at weeks 10, 30, and 54. RESULTS: At week 10, 99 of 112 (88.4%) patients responded to infliximab (95% confidence interval: [82.5%, 94.3%]) and 66 of 112 (58.9%) patients achieved clinical remission (95% confidence interval: [49.8%, 68.0%]). At week 54, 33 of 52 (63.5%) and 29 of 52 (55.8%) patients receiving infliximab every 8 weeks did not require dose adjustment and were in clinical response and clinical remission, respectively, compared with 17 of 51 (33.3%) and 12 of 51 (23.5%) patients receiving treatment every 12 weeks (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients responding to an induction regimen of infliximab were more likely to be in clinical response and remission at week 54 without dose adjustment when their maintenance therapy was given every 8 weeks rather than every 12 weeks. Allowing for dose intensification in the case of relapse, remission rates, but not response rates, at week 54 were superior with every 8-week dosing compared with every 12-week dosing.     

Once daily high dose probiotic therapy (VSL#3) for maintaining remission in recurrent or refractory pouchitis

BACKGROUND: Ten to 15% of patients with pouchitis experience refractory or recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a single daily high dose probiotic preparation (VSL#3) in maintaining antibiotic induced remission, and quality of life (QOL), for one year in such patients. METHODS: Patients with pouchitis at least twice in the previous year or requiring continuous antibiotics, associated with a pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) > or =7 (0 = perfect; 18 = worst), in whom remission was induced by four weeks of combined metronidazole and ciprofloxacin, were randomised to receive VSL#3 6 g or placebo once daily for one year or until relapse. Symptomatic, endoscopic, and histological evaluations were made before, and two and 12 months after randomisation or at the time of relapse. Remission was defined as a clinical PDAI < or =2 and endoscopic PDAI < or =1. Relapse was defined as an increased clinical PDAI score > or =2 and increased endoscopic PDAI score > or =3. QOL was assessed using the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ). RESULTS: Thirty six patients were randomised: 20 to VSL#3 and 16 to placebo. Remission was maintained at one year in 17 patients (85%) on VSL#3 and in one patient (6%) on placebo (p<0.0001). The IBDQ score remained high in the VSL#3 group (p = 0.3) but deteriorated in the placebo group (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: The once daily high dose probiotic VSL#3 is effective in maintaining antibiotic introduced remission for at least a year in patients with recurrent or refractory pouchitis. This is associated with a high level of quality of life.     

Antibiotic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The etiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unknown but may relate to an unidentified bacterial pathogen or an immunological reaction to gut microbiota. Antibiotics have therefore been proposed as a therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) to induce remission in active disease to prevent relapse. Current data are conflicting and we therefore conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating antibiotics in IBD. Only parallel group RCTs were considered eligible. Studies with adult patients receiving any dose of therapy for at least 7 days and up to 16 weeks for active disease, or at least 6 months of follow-up for preventing relapse in quiescent disease were analyzed. We included any antibiotics alone or in combination using predefined definitions of remission and relapse. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and extracted data. The primary outcome was remission or relapse using an intention-to-treat methodology. The data were summarized using relative risk (RR) and pooled using a random effects model. For active CD, there were 10 RCTs involving 1,160 patients. There was a statistically significant effect of antibiotics being superior to placebo (RR of active CD not in remission=0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.73-0.99, P=0.03). There was moderate heterogeneity between results (I(2)=48%) and a diverse number of antibiotics were tested (anti-tuberculosis therapy, macrolides, fluroquinolones, 5-nitroimidazoles, and rifaximin) either alone or in combination. Rifamycin derivatives either alone or in combination with other antibiotics appeared to have a significant effect at inducing remission in active CD. In perianal CD fistula there were three trials evaluating 123 patients using either ciprofloxacin or metronidazole. There was a statistically significant effect in reducing fistula drainage (RR=0.8; 95% CI=0.66-0.98) with no heterogeneity (I(2)=0%) and an number needed to treat 5 (95% CI=3-20). For quiescent CD, there were 3 RCTs involving 186 patients treated with different antibiotics combinations (all including antimycobacterials) vs. placebo. There was a statistically significant effect in favor of antibiotics vs. placebo (RR of relapse=0.62; 95% CI=0.46-0.84), with no heterogeneity (I(2)=0%). In active UC, there were 9 RCTs with 662 patients and there was a statistically significant benefit for antibiotics inducing remission (RR of UC not in remission=0.64; 95% CI=0.43-0.96). There was moderate heterogeneity (I(2)=69%) and antibiotics used were all different single or combination drugs. Antibiotic therapy may induce remission in active CD and UC, although the diverse number of antibiotics tested means the data are difficult to interpret. This systematic review is a mandate for further trials of antibiotic therapy in IBD.     

Risk assessment and outcome of chronic graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in pediatric patients

We retrospectively evaluated the incidence, risk factors for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) and outcome in 80 pediatric patients (36 male) (median age 13 years) who underwent allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. Patients were grafted from an HLA-identical sibling after myeloablative conditioning (total body irradiation (TBI) based 52; non-TBI 28). GvHD prophylaxis used were: cyclosporin A (CsA)+ short methotrexate (MTX) in 52 and CsA+/-prednisone in 28. The median number of CD34+ cells infused were 5.8 x 10(6)/kg (range: 1.4-32.8). The median follow-up was 24 months (range: 3-94). In all, 28 patients had cGvHD (confidence interval (CI): 54.2+/-10%). Factors that were significant on univariate analysis were diagnosis (P=0.03) and GvHD prophylaxis administered (P=0.04). On multivariate analysis, only GvHD prophylaxis used was associated with a significant risk of cGvHD (hazard ratio (HR): 3.94; 95% CI: 1.41-10.91, P=0.009). The CI of cGvHD for patients receiving CsA+MTX was 40.9+/-12 vs 76.5+/-18% for patients who did not (P=0.03). The probability of relapse was 36+/-6% for all patients (12.5+/-8% for patients with cGvHD vs 47.9+/-8% without cGvHD). The probability of disease-free survival was better for patients with cGvHD (69.9+/-10 vs 37.9+/-7%; HR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.47-5.56; P=0.001). Our data suggest that the GvHD prophylaxis used is the most relevant predictor of cGvHD. Patients with cGvHD had a lower risk of relapse and a better survival.     

Budesonide for maintenance of remission in patients with Crohn's disease in medically induced remission: a predetermined pooled analysis of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral budesonide for maintenance of remission in patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's disease (CD) of the ileum and/or ascending colon. METHODS: Four double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with identical protocols were combined according to a predetermined analysis plan. Three hundred eighty patients with CD in medically induced remission (CD activity index [CDAI]< or =150) were randomized to receive oral budesonide 3 mg, 6 mg, or placebo daily for 12 months. The primary outcome measure was time to relapse (increase in CDAI of 60 points above baseline and >150). RESULTS: The median time to relapse was 268, 170, and 154 days for budesonide 6 mg, budesonide 3 mg, and placebo groups, respectively (p= 0.0072). The frequency of adverse events and glucocorticosteroid side effects were similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: Budesonide 6 mg/day is effective for prolonging time to relapse and for significantly reducing rates of relapse at 3 and 6 months but not 12 months in patients with CD in medically induced remission.     

Switch from systemic steroids to budesonide in steroid dependent patients with inactive Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND: Steroid dependent patients with Crohn's disease are at high risk of developing glucocorticosteroid induced side effects. AIMS: We evaluated the possibility of switching from systemic steroids to budesonide (Entocort) in prednisolone/prednisone dependent patients with inactive Crohn's disease affecting the ileum and/or ascending colon. PATIENTS: Steroid dependent patients with a Crohn's disease activity index 200 and an increase of 60 points from baseline or withdrawal due to disease deterioration. RESULTS: After one and 13 weeks without prednisolone, relapse rates were 17% and 32%, respectively, in the budesonide group, and 41% and 65% in the placebo group (95% confidence intervals for the difference in percentages -41%, -8% and -51%, -16%; p=0.004 and p<0.001, respectively). The number of glucocorticosteroid side effects was reduced by 50% by switching from prednisolone and was similar in the budesonide and placebo groups. Basal plasma cortisol increased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with steroid dependent ileocaecal Crohn's disease may be switched to budesonide controlled ileal release capsules 6 mg without relapse, resulting in a sharp decrease in glucocorticosteroid side effects similar to placebo, and with an increase in plasma cortisol levels.