A factor analysis of signs and symptoms of the manic episode with Bech-Rafaelsen Mania and Melancholia Scales

BACKGROUND: Several factor analyses of signs and symptoms of mania have been reported using different rating scales. We propose here that the use of two instruments well known in the European literature may be useful in detecting the structure of manic episodes. METHOD: We investigated the pattern of symptoms in a group of 124 bipolar inpatients hospitalised for a manic episode. We conducted a factor analysis of the broad range of psychiatric symptoms covered by the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale (BRMaS) and Melancholia Scale (BRMeS). RESULTS: Five eigen values were greater than unity, which determined the number of factors computed. The five factors captured 66.7% of the total variance. Following rotation, five factors were clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: This suggests that both euphoric activation and depression are prominent in this sample.     

A comparison of the behavioral observation system (BOS) with clinician ratings of psychosis and mania

This study investigated the relationship of the behavioral observation system (BOS; LePage & Mogge, 2001) and clinician ratings of psychosis and mania. Fifty interviews with psychiatric inpatients using the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the Young Mania Rating scale were completed. Paraprofessionals completed a BOS on the patient during the same day of the clinician's interview. The results of the study demonstrate the convergent validity of the BOS scales and support the use of the BOS by paraprofessionals to assess behaviors associated with psychosis and mania. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 66: 333–338, 2010.     

Assessment of mood states in patients receiving long-term corticosteroid therapy and in controls with patient-rated and clinician-rated scales.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids have been used for many years for inflammatory diseases. Mood changes are common during short-term, high-dose, corticosteroid therapy. Virtually no data are available on the mood effects of long-term corticosteroid therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate mood during corticosteroid therapy using standard clinician-rated and patient-rated measures. METHODS: Outpatients receiving prednisone therapy (7.5 mg/d for 6 months) and similar controls were enrolled. Current mood was evaluated using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Internal State Scale (ISS), and a diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Twenty patients and 14 controls were enrolled in the study. Depressive symptom severity as evaluated by the HRSD and ISS depression and well-being subscales and global psychiatric symptom severity as evaluated by the BPRS and ISS perceived conflict subscale were greater in patients receiving prednisone than controls. Manic symptom severity as evaluated by the ISS activation subscale but not the YMRS was higher in patients receiving prednisone. Twelve (60%) of 20 corticosteroid-treated patients met diagnostic criteria for a lifetime prednisone-induced mood disorder. Activation subscale scores did not correlate with YMRS scores. Other ISS subscales showed expected correlations with clinician-rated assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Mood symptoms and disorders are common in corticosteroid-dependent patients. Unlike short-term prednisone therapy, long-term therapy may be more associated with depressive than manic symptoms based on the clinician-rated assessments. The ISS may be more sensitive to mood symptoms with prednisone than clinician-rated scales.     

Mismatch between self-reported quality of life and functional assessment in acute mania: a matter of unawareness of illness?

BACKGROUND: Studies addressing self-reported quality of life (QoL) in acute mania are scarce and inconsistent. While it has been suggested that there is some disagreement between objective measures and subjective QoL as reported by acutely manic patients, this issue has not been systematically studied. This study aims to investigate the self-reported QoL in manic, depressed, and euthymic BD subjects, as compared to matched healthy controls. METHODS: One-hundred and twenty type-I bipolar patients (40 manic, 40 depressed, and 40 euthymic) and 40 matched controls were studied. Self-reported QoL was assessed using the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Instrument-Short Version (WHOQOL-BREF). Objective functioning was assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), and depressive and manic symptoms were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 items (HDRS) and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), respectively. RESULTS: Manic patients presented the lowest GAF measures but reported same overall QoL as euthymic patients and controls, and better QoL than depressed patients. Within the manic subgroup, there was a significant inverse correlation between psychological QoL and GAF scores (r=-0.54; p=0.001). LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design and the lack of control for potential comorbid conditions are the major limitations of the present study. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that this mismatch between objective and subjective measures during acute mania may be associated with a lack of insight or awareness of their own illness.     

Risperidone in the treatment of mania: efficacy and safety results from a large,multicentre, open study in Spain

BACKGROUND: A number of open studies and preliminary results of unpublished double-blind trials have suggested that the novel antipsychotic risperidone may be effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute mania in bipolar disorder. METHODS: A total of 174 patients entered this large, open, multicentre trial. Inclusion criteria were: current manic, hypomanic or mixed episode (DSM-IV), and a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score of >7. Assessments included the YMRS, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and Udvalg for Kliniske Unders?gelser (UKU) subscale for neurological side effects. RESULTS: There were significant reductions (P<0.0001) on the YMRS, PANSS and HAM-D scores and a significant improvement (P<0.0001) in CGI ratings at the endpoint. There were no statistically significant increments in the severity of extrapyramidal symptoms according to the UKU. Risperidone was generally well tolerated. The mean dose of risperidone at the endpoint was 4.9+/-2.9 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This open study provides further evidence that risperidone is safe and effective in combination with mood stabilisers in the manic phase of bipolar disorder. LIMITATIONS: The open design and the use of concomitant medications make unclear to what extent the positive results were entirely related to risperidone.     

Effects of symptomatic severity on elevation of plasma soluble interleukin-2 receptor in bipolar mania

BACKGROUND: Circulating soluble interleukin-2 receptors (sIL-2Rs) and soluble interleukin-6 receptors (sIL-6Rs) are stable immune measures. Elevated plasma sIL-2R levels are present in patients with schizophrenia, major depression, and bipolar mania, but not with minor psychiatric disorders. The increased plasma sIL-2R levels are state-dependent in bipolar mania. However, altered production of plasma sIL-6R and the effects of clinical characteristics on plasma sIL-6R and sIL-2R levels in bipolar disorder remains uncertain. METHODS: Plasma sIL-2R and sIL-6R levels were measured in 31 Taiwanese bipolar manic (DSM-IV) patients with Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores of > or =26 as well as during the subsequent remission (YMRS< or =12), and equal numbers of age- and gender-matched healthy controls. The relationships of clinical variables such as age, age of onset, smoking, medication status, coexisting psychotic features, number of prior episodes, duration of illness, presence of depression before or following the manic episode, and manic severity to plasma sIL-2R and sIL-6R levels in acute mania along with remission were examined. RESULTS: Plasma sIL-2R but not sIL-6R levels were significantly higher in acute mania than in subsequent remission (P<0.05) and controls (P<0.0005). In acute mania, the plasma sIL-2R levels were significantly correlated to YMRS scores (r=0.34, P<0.05). The remaining clinical variables had no effect on plasma sIL-2R and sIL-6R levels in acute mania or remission. There was a significantly positive relationship between the reduction of plasma sIL-2R levels from the acute to follow-up measurements (DeltasIL-2R) and symptomatic improvement of acute mania (DeltaYMRS) (r=0.61, P<0.001). Limitations: Our sample included medicated and unmedicated patients in acute mania. The psychotropic medication may have divergent effects on the plasma sIL-2R levels in acute mania and subsequent remission. CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of plasma sIL-2R but not sIL-6R levels in bipolar mania supports the idea that the immunomodulatory mechanism may vary in different psychotic disorders. In contrast to being a trait marker in schizophrenia and depressive disorder, plasma sIL-2R levels may be considered a biological indicator of manic severity in a group of bipolar affective patients.     

Role of risperidone in bipolar II: an open 6-month study

BACKGROUND: Since treatment approaches thought to be useful for mania are presumably suitable for hypomania as well, little systematic research has been done on the treatment of hypomanic episodes and their long-term outcome. As systematic trials have shown that the atypical antipsychotic risperidone may be effective and safe in the treatment of acute mania, we decided to conduct an open-label study of its effectiveness and tolerability in hypomania associated with bipolar II. METHODS: Forty-four DSM-IV bipolar II patients with Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores above 7 were included and followed-up for 6 months. Efficacy was measured by means of the YMRS and the Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BD). Treatment-emergent depression was measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), and the Udvalg for Kliniske Unders?gelser (UKU) subscale was used for neurological/extrapyramidal side-effects. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients completed the trial. The mean dose of risperidone at endpoint was 2.8 mg/day. Last observation-carried-forward analysis showed significant reduction of YMRS scores from the first week of treatment, which continued until the endpoint (P<0.0001). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were assymptomatic according to the CGI. The 32% who received risperidone in monotherapy seemed to respond equally well. Risperidone, as used in this study, appeared to be most protective against hypomanic than depressive recurrences. Nine patients (12%) had a depressive relapse during 6-month follow-up, one patient (2%) had an hypomanic relapse and another (2%) had both. No patients developed tardive dyskinesia during the duration of the study. Although most patients received risperidone in combination with standard mood-stabilizers, only three patients discontinued risperidone because of other side-effects. LIMITATIONS: In the absence of a placebo arm, it is uncertain to what extent the foregoing results could be ascribed to spontaneous remission of bipolar II disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone, either in combination with mood-stabilizers or alone was well-tolerated in bipolar II patients, who presented in a hypomanic state, and appeared efficacious. Further controlled research on the role of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of less-than-manic forms of bipolar illness is warranted.     

Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in subpopulations with acute manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder

BACKGROUND: This analysis was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole compared with placebo in subpopulations of patients with acute manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder. METHODS: Acutely manic patients experiencing DSM-IV manic/mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder were pooled from two randomized, three-week, flexible-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (N=516) and stratified by disease severity (Young Mania Rating Scale, YMRS), episode type, presence or absence of psychotic features, episode frequency, age, gender, and baseline severity of depressive symptoms. Safety and treatment-emergent adverse-event analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Aripiprazole significantly reduced mean YMRS total scores at end point compared with placebo in patients with more severe or less severe illness, with mixed or manic episodes, with or without psychotic features, or with a history of rapid or non-rapid cycling (p<0.01 for each subpopulation); in men and women (p=0.001 for both); in patients in the 18-40 and 41-55 year age groups (por=5% of patients aged 18-40 years receiving aripiprazole were similar to those reported for the overall population. LIMITATIONS: This post hoc analysis utilized pooled data from two short-term studies. CONCLUSION: Efficacy of the second-generation antipsychotic aripiprazole was noted across a broad range of subpopulations often associated with treatment resistance in patients experiencing manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder.     

Olanzapine versus lithium in the acute treatment of bipolar mania: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled study conducted in China examined the efficacy and safety of olanzapine versus lithium in the treatment of patients with bipolar manic/mixed episodes. METHODS: Patients with bipolar manic or mixed episode (DSM-IV criteria) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score> or =20 at screening received olanzapine (5-20 mg/day, n=69) or lithium carbonate (600-1800 mg/day, n=71) for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was mean change from baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar Version Overall Severity of Illness (CGI-BP) score. Secondary efficacy measures included YMRS, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A significantly greater mean change was observed in olanzapine versus lithium patients in CGI-BP (Overall Severity) (P=0.009), YMRS (P=0.013), BPRS (P=0.032), and CGI-BP (Severity of Mania) (P=0.012) scores. More olanzapine than lithium patients experienced at least one adverse event possibly related to study drug (P=0.038). More olanzapine patients had a clinically significant weight increase (> or =7% of baseline weight) compared to lithium patients (P=0.009). More olanzapine patients completed the study than lithium patients, although this difference was not statistically significant (olz, 91.3%; lith, 78.9%; P=0.057). LIMITATIONS: No placebo arm was included; however both treatments have previously been reported to be more effective than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that olanzapine has superior efficacy to lithium in the acute treatment of patients with bipolar mania over a 4-week period. However, adverse events were experienced by a greater number of olanzapine patients than lithium patients.     

Gabapentin treatment of the non-refractory bipolar spectrum: an open case series

OBJECTIVE: To determine if gabapentin is effective in monotherapy or add-on treatment of non-refractory bipolar disorder in open prospective treatment. METHODS: Charts of 21 outpatients meeting DSM-IV criteria for bipolar spectrum disorder (type I, type II, NOS, and cyclothymia) and who were treated with gabapentin were reviewed and clinical response was assessed based on prospective application of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI), and the Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF). Also, response was rated retrospectively using the Clinical Global Impression scale for Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP). RESULTS: Eight patients received gabapentin monotherapy and 13 received adjunctive therapy. Similar improvement in depression was noted in the monotherapy group, without induction of mania. Gabapentin was associated with a 43.8% improvement in manic symptoms and a 27.6% improvement in depressive symptoms in the overall sample. In the depressed subsample (n=10), there was a 57.5% improvement in depressive symptoms (P=0.10). Using the CGI-BP, gabapentin was moderately to markedly effective in 43% of patients for overall bipolar illness, 38% for depressive symptoms, and 25% for manic symptoms. Of those in the study, 62% reported side effects, mainly sedation and nausea, with 14% of the total sample discontinuing treatment due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin, either alone or as an adjunct, appeared moderately effective in treating depression in this small, uncontrolled, heterogeneous sample of non-refractory bipolar spectrum illness. Coupled with the earlier clinical literature, these data suggest the need for prospective double-blind studies of depressive illness in the bipolar spectrum.     

Reduced production of interferon-gamma but not interleukin-10 in bipolar mania and subsequent remission

BACKGROUND: Activation of inflammatory response system (IRS) is suggested by increased levels of plasma soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) in patients with bipolar mania. The reasons for changes in stimulated interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) production in bipolar mania along with subsequent remission remain unclear. METHODS: We measured phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated IFN-gamma and IL-10 production in 20 physically healthy inpatients aged between 18 and 45 years with bipolar mania (DSM-IV) using Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores > or = 26 and in subsequent remission (YMRS < or = 12), as well as in 15 age- and sex-matched healthy normal controls. RESULTS: The mean values of IFN-gamma production in patients in acute mania and in subsequent remission were significantly lower than those of healthy controls (P=0.0004, P=0.0005, respectively). There was no significant difference in IL-10 production between bipolar patients in acute mania as well as in subsequent remission and healthy controls. In acute mania, the mean values of IFN-gamma and IL-10 production in medicated patients (n = 13) did not differ from those of drug-free patients (n = 7). Other clinical variables had no effect on IFN-gamma and IL-10 production. LIMITATION: The uncontrolled medication, small sample size of the bipolar individuals, and some immune re-measurements prior to full remission periods, limit generalization from the data in this study. CONCLUSION: Reduced production of IFN-gamma without alternation of IL-10 in bipolar mania and subsequent remission suggest that the immune modulation may vary in patients with different major psychiatric disorders.     

奥氮平与无抽搐电休克治疗女性躁狂发作的随机对照研究

目的比较奥氮平冲击疗法与无抽搐电休克治疗(MECT)对女性躁狂发作的疗效和安全性。方法 50例住院女性患者随机分为奥氮平组和MECT组,奥氮平组每晚服药,第1天20mg/d,以后依据患者耐受情况调整到15~30mg/d。MECT组:在第1天,第2天,第3天,第5天,第7天,第9天行无抽搐电休克治疗,共6次。在基线,第1天,第3天,第6天,第9天,第14天,第21天分别采用杨氏躁狂量表(YMRS)评估疗效,采用不良反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。基线和终点进行血常规,尿常规,血生化,甲状腺功能及心电图检查,以评价安全性。结果采用重复测量的方差分析比较两组治疗前后YMRS分值变化以及组间有无差异,结果显示奥氮平组治疗后YMRS总分显著下降(F=274.7,P0.01),MECT组治疗后YMRS总分也显著下降(F=350.9,P0.01),两组组间比较无显著差异(F=2.0,P=0.163)。奥氮平组有效21例,MECT组有效23例,两组间无显著性差异(χ2=0.758,P0.05);奥氮平组痊愈18例,MECT组痊愈19例,两组间也无显著性差异(χ2=0.104,P0.05)。两组之间不良事件的总发生率没有显著差异(P0.05)。结论奥氮平冲击疗法对急性躁狂发作有效,安全性好,与MECT相比无明显差异,是一种安全、有效、符合快速综合治疗要求的治疗急性躁狂发作的新方法。     

The empirical redefinition of the psychometric criteria for remission in bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND: Current definitions of remission for mania and bipolar depression are convention-rather than empirically-based, and their clinical salience is unclear, as few studies have attempted to calibrate them against objective clinical criteria. This study aimed to determine equivalence scores on two widely used clinical rating scales, the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), that corresponded with an objective global clinical measure of remission in bipolar disorder patients. METHODS: Data from four pharmacological randomised controlled trials in bipolar I disorder were analysed. Two trials were conducted for bipolar depression (N=410 and 833), and two for manic or mixed episodes (N=136 and 110). In this study, a Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) severity score of 1 (normal, not at all ill) was used as the primary comparative measure of remission. The mean total YMRS and MADRS scores in the mania and depression studies, respectively, that corresponded with a CGI-BP severity score of 1 were determined. RESULTS: The mean YMRS score that corresponded with a CGI-BP severity score of 1 was <4 in both trials (2.6 and 3.0, respectively), and the mean corresponding MADRS score was <5 (4.1 and 4.6, respectively). LIMITATIONS: Utilising a psychometric definition of remission. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a cut-off score of <5 on the MADRS and <4 on the YMRS approximates a CGI-BP definition of complete remission. Although lower than conventional cut-off scores, these perhaps better represent clinical reality and patient expectations. In the context of clinical trials, study end-points may be more difficult to reach with lower cut-offs, but the outcomes achieved are more likely to be clinically meaningful.     

Rapid versus non-rapid cycling as a predictor of response to olanzapine and divalproex sodium for bipolar mania and maintenance of remission: post hoc analyses of 47-week data

BACKGROUND: Rapid cycling in bipolar disorder has been associated with greater morbidity. We examine whether rapid cycling affects treatment response to olanzapine or divalproex in acute mania. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of a 47-week, randomized, double-blind study compared olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) to divalproex sodium (500-2500 mg/day) for bipolar manic or mixed episodes (N=251). Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores > or = 20 were required for inclusion. Patients were classified at study entry as "rapid cyclers" if they experienced > or = 4 episodes within the last year. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to analyze YMRS change from baseline. RESULTS: A significant three-way interaction (cycling frequency by medication by visit) was found when modeling change in YMRS total scores. For patients with bipolar I disorder identified as rapid cyclers, mania improvement across the trial did not differ significantly between treatment groups (p=0.181). Among non-rapid cyclers, olanzapine-treated patients had significantly greater YMRS improvement than divalproex-treated patients across the trial (p<0.001) and at most time points. Among olanzapine-treated patients, non-rapid cyclers experienced numerically greater YMRS improvement than rapid cyclers throughout the trial; statistically significant differences occurred at weeks 11, 15 and 39. In contrast, among divalproex-treated patients, YMRS scores were significantly better in rapid cyclers than non-rapid cyclers during the first two study weeks but were comparable thereafter. A similar pattern was seen in Clinical Global Impressions-Mania Severity scores. Hamilton Depression scores in rapid versus non-rapid cycling patients differed at some time points but not over the entire trial and differences by cycling status were not treatment-specific. LIMITATIONS: Apart from the post hoc nature of the analyses, there were high dropout rates in both groups, and cycle frequency was not taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid cycling patients did less well over long-term treatment than non-rapid cycling patients. Among rapid cycling patients, olanzapine and divalproex appear similarly effective against manic symptoms; however, among non-rapid cycling patients, olanzapine-treated patients experienced superior mania improvement. Olanzapine-treated, non-rapid cyclers experienced greater mania improvement than rapid cyclers. The converse was true of divalproex-treated patients early in treatment.     

Lithium increases plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor in acute bipolar mania: a preliminary 4-week study

Several studies have suggested an important role for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the pathophysiology and therapeutics of bipolar disorder (BPD). The mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of lithium in BPD seem to involve a direct regulation of neurotrophic cascades. However, no clinical study evaluated the specific effects of lithium on BDNF levels in subjects with BPD. This study aims to investigate the effects of lithium monotherapy on BDNF levels in acute mania. Ten subjects with bipolar I disorder in a manic episode were evaluated at baseline and after 28 days of lithium therapy. Changes in plasma BDNF levels and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores were analyzed. A significant increase in plasma BDNF levels was observed after 28 days of therapy with lithium monotherapy (510.9±127.1pg/mL) compared to pre-treatment (406.3±69.5pg/mL) (p=0.03). Although it was not found a significant association between BDNF levels and clinical improvement (YMRS), 87% of responders presented an increase in BDNF levels after treatment with lithium. These preliminary data showed lithium's direct effects on BDNF levels in bipolar mania, suggesting that short-term lithium treatment may activate neurotrophic cascades. Further studies with larger samples and longer period may confirm whether this biological effect is involved in the therapeutic efficacy of lithium in BPD.     

Validation of the prospective NIMH-Life-Chart Method (NIMH-LCM-p) for longitudinal assessment of bipolar illness

BACKGROUND: Systematic and accurate depiction of a patient's course of illness is crucial for assessing the efficacy of maintenance treatments for bipolar disorder. This need to rate the long-term prospective course of illness led to the development of the National Institute of Mental Health prospective Life Chart Methodology (NIMH-LCM-p or LCM). The NIMH-LCM-p allows for the daily assessment of mood and episode severity based on the degree of mood associated functional impairment. We have previously presented preliminary evidence of the reliability and validity of the LCM, and its utility in clinical trials. This study is a further and more extensive validation of the clinician rated NIMH-LCM-p. METHODS: Subjects included 270 bipolar patients from the five sites participating in the Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network. Daily prospective LCM ratings on the clinician form were initiated upon entry, in addition to at least monthly ratings with the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-clinician rated (IDS-C), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). We correlated appropriate measures and time domains of the LCM with the IDS-C, YMRS and GAF. RESULTS: Severity of depression on the LCM and on the IDS-C were highly correlated in 270 patients (r = -0.785, P < 0.001). Similarly, a strong correlation was found between LCM mania and the YMRS (r = 0.656, P < 0.001) and between the LCM average severity of illness and the GAF (r = -0.732, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data further demonstrate the validity and potential utility of the NIMH-LCM-p for the detailed daily longitudinal assessment of manic and depressive severity and course, and response to treatment.     

Toward an integration of parent and clinician report on the Young Mania Rating Scale

BACKGROUND: The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) has validity in the assessment of mania in adults. The purpose of this study was to examine how the YMRS might optimally be used in the assessment of youths. METHODS: Children and adolescents between the ages of 5 and 17 years of age participated in this study. All youths were evaluated with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS). Based on the K-SADS results, subjects were then assigned to one of five groups: a bipolar I group, another bipolar spectrum group, a depressive disorders group, a disruptive behaviors disorders group, and a no diagnosis group. Guardians completed a version of the YMRS modified for parent reporting. Clinicians completed the YMRS on all participating youths. RESULTS: Both parent and clinician ratings on the YMRS assigned patients (n=117) to the appropriate diagnostic group with 71-98% accuracy. Combining information from multiple informants did not significantly improve diagnostic group assignment. LIMITATIONS: The same raters completed the clinician YMRS and the K-SADS interview involving the parent. Findings need replication in an independent sample with lower base rates of bipolar disorder, less rigorously trained and supervised raters, and using a prospective design to provide maximum generalizability of results. Current results should be interpreted as a 'best case' scenario. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the YMRS may be a useful adjunct in assessing the severity of mania in youths. Tentative cutting scores are proposed to maximize efficiency, sensitivity, and specificity.     

Correlates of suicidal ideation in dysphoric mania

BACKGROUND: Previous investigations have reported that suicidal ideation and behavior are more prevalent during mixed than pure mania. Uncertainties exist about whether suicidality in mania arises from multiple concurrent depressive symptoms, or rather, as a categorical phenomenon, reflecting dysphoria without necessarily a full major depression. To elucidate the relationship between suicidal ideation and dysphoric mania, we analyzed clinical and demographic features associated with suicidal versus nonsuicidal dysphoric manic inpatients. METHODS: Records were reviewed for 100 DSM-III-R bipolar I manic inpatients at the Payne Whitney Clinic of New York Hospital from 1991-1995. All had > or = 2 concomitant depressive symptoms (other than suicidality). Affective and psychotic symptoms, past suicide attempts, prior illness, and related clinical/demographic variables were assessed by a standardized protocol. RESULTS: Suicidal ideation was significantly more common among dysphoric manics who were caucasian, took antidepressant medications in the week prior to admission, had histories of alcohol abuse/dependence, and made past suicide attempts. Suicidal ideation was evident for nearly half of dysphoric manic patients with < or = 3 depressive symptoms who did not meet DSM criteria for a mixed state. No individual manic or depressive symptoms other than dysphoric mood were more common among suicidal than nonsuicidal patients. LIMITATIONS: Findings from this retrospective study require confirmation using a prospective assessment. Treatments were naturalistic and may have differentially influenced hospital course and illness characteristics. Factors related to suicide attempts (rare in this cohort) or completions (not a focus of this study) may differ from those related only to suicidal ideation. CONCLUSIONS: Caucasian dysphoric manic patients with past suicide attempts and substance abuse may have a significantly elevated risk for suicidality, even when full major depression does not accompany mania. Suicidality is a clinically important consideration in a majority of dysphoric manic patients.     

Symptom structure of acute mania: a factor study of the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in a national sample of patients hospitalized for a manic episode

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing interest in dimensional psychopathology and the use of symptom clusters in clinical research, factor analytic studies of mania are rare. Most studies included not only manic patients, but also patients with a mixed episode or other severe mental disorders. We aimed at further elucidating the symptom structure of manic states. METHODS: As part of a national survey of acute psychiatric inpatient care, all patients admitted to a random sample of Italian public and private facilities during an index period underwent a standardized assessment, including the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS-24). Eighty-eight patients (90% of all manic patients admitted) with an ICD-10 diagnosis of Bipolar Affective Disorder, Current Episode Manic with complete data were included in this study. Principal axis factor analysis with Varimax rotation was performed on BPRS-24 items. RESULTS: Four factors were extracted, explaining 51% of total variance. They were interpreted as Mania, Disorganization, Positive Symptoms, and Dysphoria. The distribution of the Disorganization factor was positively skewed, with most patients relatively free from disorganization symptoms and some patients showing varying degrees of severity. LIMITATIONS: The sample size was relatively small; also, patients were not administered a structured diagnostic interview. However, reasonably large samples are usually sufficient when communalities are high. Also, the manic episode is a clear-cut diagnostic entity easily identified by experienced clinicians, and the independent BPRS-24 ratings corroborated the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of a Mania, Positive Symptoms, and Dysphoria factor is consistent with most previous studies. The identification of a Disorganization factor in a sample including only manic patients is a new finding that may have clinical implications, as its distribution suggests the possibility of distinguishing two patient groups, which may require different interventions to achieve optimal therapeutic response. The factorially derived BPRS-24 subscales may be useful for evaluation of treatment effects in clinical trials of antimanic agents.