Live-donor liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure

BACKGROUND: The survival results of patients demonstrating acute-on-chronic liver failure and undergoing live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have been reported to be poor. This study evaluates the survival outcomes of patients who underwent LDLT using right-lobe liver grafts for acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure. METHODS: The study comprised 32 patients who demonstrated acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure with mean (+/- standard error of mean) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores of 36+/-1.8. The mean preoperative intensive care unit stay was 2.4 days. LDLT using a right-lobe liver graft including the middle hepatic vein was performed in all patients. Oral lamivudine 100 mg daily was used for hepatitis B prophylaxis. RESULTS: The patients received liver grafts that were 52%+/-2% of the estimated standard liver weight. Hospital mortality occurred in two patients, and two other patients died on follow-up. At a median follow-up of 23 months, both patient and graft survival rates were 88%. The survival results were not different from those of 49 patients who underwent right-lobe LDLT for elective conditions during the same study period (graft survival=82%, P=0.55; patient survival=84%, P=0.75). Two (6.3%) patients developed hepatitis B virus DNA breakthrough 47 and 53 months, respectively, after transplantation, but they remained well after treatment with adefovir. CONCLUSION: Right-lobe LDLT is an effective therapeutic option for patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure. It results in satisfactory survival outcomes comparable to those in patients undergoing LDLT for elective conditions.     

Live donor liver transplantation in adults

Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was initiated in 1988 for children recipients. Its application to adult recipients was limited by graft size until the first right liver LDLT was performed in Hong Kong in 1996. Since then, right liver graft has become the major graft type. Despite rapid adoption of LDLT by many centers, many controversies on donor selection, indications, techniques, and ethics exist. With the recent known 11 donor deaths around the world, transplant surgeons are even more cautious than the past in the evaluation and selection of donors. The need for routine liver biopsy in donor evaluation is arguable but more and more centers opt for a policy of liberal liver biopsy. Donation of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the right liver graft was considered unsafe but now data indicate that the outcome of donors with or without MHV donation is about equal. Right liver LDLT has been shown to improve the overall survival rate of patients with chronic liver disease, acute or acute-on-chronic liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma waiting for liver transplantation. The outcome of LDLT is equivalent to deceased donor liver transplantation despite a smaller graft size and higher technical complexity.     

Toward 300 liver transplants a year

The technical success of cadaveric whole-size liver transplantation and better immunosuppressive drugs has extended the application of this life-saving procedure to include patients with irreversible acute and chronic liver diseases. However, because of the scarcity of cadaveric liver grafts, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as an alternative to cadaveric-donor liver transplantation (CDLT), especially in Asia. In Korea, 8% of the population are hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers, and the resultant HBV cirrhosis, with or without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is common in the 40- to 60-year-old generation. Accordingly, many patients require orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In 1992, we started performing CDLTs in the Asan Medical Center. In 1994, the first successful pediatric LDLT was performed in Korea, on a 9-monthold infant with biliary atresia. In 1997, the first successful adult LDLT was performed in our department, using a left lobe, on a 37-year-old patient with HBV cirrhosis associated with HCC. Even after the first successful right-lobe LDLT, we faced the obstacle of anterior segment congestion of a right-lobe graft, and initiated reconstruction of the middle hepatic venous tributaries of a right-lobe graft in 1998. In 1999, we performed more than 100 OLTs a year. Insufficient graft size has hindered the expansion of adult LDLT, when the remaining left-lobe of potential donors is too small to assure donor safety. Dual two-left-lobe graft LDLT (transplanting from two donors into one recipient) was developed in 2000 to solve graft-size insufficiency and minimize donor risk. More than 200 OLTs a year have been performed since 2004, while broadening the indications for adult LDLT to near complete obstruction of the portal vein, with the application of intraoperative portography (IOP) and portal vein stenting. In 2007, 320 LTs were performed, including 276 adult LDLTs, 10 pediatric LDLTs, and 34 CDLTs (including 7 adult and 1 pediatric split-liver transplant). There has been no donor mortality in LDLT. With technical refinement and advanced perioperative care, the in-hospital mortality of recipients has dropped to 4%: attributed to the dedication of our liver transplantation team members.     

Critical graft size and functional recovery in living donor liver transplantation

With a high prevalence of chronic hepatitis B and a low cadaveric organ donation rate, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains the only option for many patients in Hong Kong. In such cases, the liver graft volume is smaller owing to a partial liver graft; therefore, a problem of small-for-size grafts often occurs. Between September 1999 and April 2003, 25 cadaveric, 16 living related, and 1 auto-LTs were performed at our center. The outcomes of LDLT were analyzed to assess the critical graft size and functional recovery. Among the 16 LDLT recipients (mean age, 44.4 +/- 14.4 years; mean weight, 61.9 +/- 11.4 kg), 1 patient received a graft from a donor left lobe (weight, 400 g) in an auxillary partial orthotopic LT (APOLT), 12 received right lobes, and 3 received left lobes. Besides the APOLT case, the overall graft/recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for the 15 LDLTs was 1.11 (0.76 to 1.75). The GRWR in the 25 cadaveric LTs was 1.92 (1.05 to 3.69) (P < .001). Among the 12 successful LDLTs, there were 5 (41.7%) cases of small-for-size graft syndrome: 3 of 3 (100%) in GRWR < or = 0.8%; 5 of 6 (83.3%) in GRWR < 1%; and 0 of 6 with GRWR > 1%. The initial post-LT graft function parameters were significantly higher among the LDLT group: International normalized ratio (INR), 1.42 vs 1.24, P = .03; alanine aminotransferase (ALT, 387 vs 201 IU/L, P = .005, and bilirubin, 170 vs 48 micromol/L, P < .001 as compared to the cadaveric transplant group). Small-for-size graft syndrome can be avoided if GRWR > 1%, but often occurs when GRWR < 0.8%. Graft function in LDLT recovers more slowly than in cadaveric liver transplant.     

Monosegmental living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) program has been started from 1990 in Japan, and is still major form of liver transplantation because of the scarcity of cadaveric donor organs. In small infants, implantation of left lateral segment grafts can be a problem because of a large-for-size graft. Until November 2002, we performed 867 transplants for 828 patients (561 children and 306 adults), and 14 cases received monosegment grafts from living donors. METHODS: Fifteen patients, median age 211 days, median weights 5.95 kg, received monosegmental LDLT. The indication for using this technique was infants with an estimated graft-to-recipient weight ratio of over 4.0%. RESULTS: Graft and patient survival is 85.7%. There were no differences in donor operation time and blood loss between monosegmentectomy and left lateral segmentectomy. Segment III grafts were indicated in 13 cases. Two vascular complications were observed (one hepatic artery thrombosis and one portal vein thrombosis). CONCLUSIONS: Monosegental living donor liver transplantation is a feasible option with satisfactory graft survival in small babies with liver failure.     

Impact of Right Lobe with Middle Hepatic Vein Graft in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

Technical improvements in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have led to the use of right-lobe grafts to overcome the problems encountered with 'small-for-size grafts'. The major controversy remains that the venous drainage from anterior segment substantially depends on tributaries of the middle hepatic vein (MHV), and deprivation of such tributaries may critically influence the postoperative graft function. Right-lobe grafts with MHV could resolve the potential problem of congestion in anterior segment. From December 2000 to January 2004, we performed 217 right-lobe LDLTs for adult patients. Of these, 40 patients received a right lobe with MHV graft (18.4%). The overall cumulative 3-year graft survival rate of a right lobe with (n = 40) and without MHV (n = 177) was 86.2% and 74.8% (p = NS). The proximal side of the MHV and the drainage vein of segment IV to the MHV (the left medial superior vein) were preserved in 24 patients. All of them needed venous interposition graft for anastomosis. All patients had a patent right hepatic vein (RHV) and MHV anastomosis during the follow-up period. We adopted the right lobe with MHV graft in 40 LDLT cases. Vein graft is essential for safe MHV anastomosis in cases which preserve proximal side of the MHV.     

Adult-to-adult live-donor liver transplantation: the current status

Adult-to-adult live-donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) has emerged successfully to partially relieve the refractory shortage of deceased donor grafts caused by the increasing demands of patients with endstage liver diseases. Following the first successful live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for a child with biliary atresia in 1989, further extension of the technique, using left-lobe liver grafts for LDLT for large adolescents and adults, has resulted in satisfactory graft and patient survival outcomes. However, small-for-size syndrome may occur in some patients with large body size, and in those with acute-on-chronic liver failure or severe portal hypertension. To overcome the problem of graft-to-body-size mismatch, ALDLT, using a right-lobe liver graft was developed. Although routine inclusion of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the right-lobe liver graft is still controversial, the importance of providing good venous drainage for the right anterior sector to ensure better early graft function has gained wide recognition. Preservation of the MHV in the donor is intuitively considered important in reducing the donor risk. However, there are scarce data supporting the contention that postoperative complication is related to the absence of the MHV in the left-liver remnant. Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction has potential advantages over hepaticojejunostomy, and has become the preferred technique in ALDLT. However, biliary complications, especially biliary strictures on long-term follow-up, occur in about 30% of the recipients. The potential beneficial effect of internal or external biliary drainage in reducing the biliary complication rate after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in ALDLT also remains controversial. Dual-liver grafts and right-posterior sector grafts have been used in ALDLT, and are reported to result in satisfactory survival outcomes at selected transplant centers. There is no strong evidence supporting the postulate that patients with hepatitis C infection have an inferior survival outcome after ALDLT when compared with recipients of a deceased-donor liver transplant. ALDLT has contributed to satisfactory survival outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It allows early surgery for the patients and eliminates the uncertainty of prolonged waiting for a deceased-donor liver graft, and the risks of dropout related to disease progression. The exact selection criteria of patients with HCC for ALDLT have yet to be defined.     

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation at the Asan Medical Center,Korea

Between February 1997 and December 2001, 311 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplants (A-A LDLTs) were performed at the Asan Medical Center for patients above 20 years of age. Indications for A-A LDLT were: chronic hepatitis B (203), chronic hepatitis C (5), hepatocellular carcinoma (64), alcoholic cirrhosis (9), cryptogenic cirrhosis (4), secondary biliary cirrhosis (5), primary biliary cirrhosis (1), Wilson' s disease (2), autoimmune hepatitis (1), hepatic tuberculosis (1), cholangiocarcinoma (1), fulminant hepatic failure (14) and primary non-function of cadaveric liver graft (1). Of 311 A-A LDLTs, 36 were of medical high urgency, 20 were for acute and subacute hepatic failure, 15 were for hepato-renal syndrome and 1 was for primary non-function. Recipient age ranged from 27 to 64 years. Donor age ranged from 16 to 62 years. There was no donor mortality. Implanted liver grafts were categorized into seven types: 175 modified right lobe (MRL), 70 left lobe, 32 right lobe, 20 dual grafts, 10 left lobe plus caudate lobe, three extended right lobe and one posterior segment. In MRL, the tributaries of the middle hepatic vein were reconstructed by interpositioning a vein graft. Indication for dual graft implantation was the same as single graft A-A LDLT, and four of 20 were emergency cases. Of 20 dual grafts, 14 received two left lobes, four received a left lobe and a lateral segment, one received a right lobe and a left lobe and one received a lateral segment and a posterior segment. Graft volume ranged from 28% to 83% of the standard liver volume of the recipients. There were 33 (10.6%) in-hospital mortalities (< 4 months) among the 310 patients after 311 A-A LDLTs. Of the 36 patients receiving emergency transplants, 31 survived. These encouraging results justify the expansion of A-A LDLT in coping with increasing demands, even in urgent situations. We have aimed to introduce the establishment of the efficacy of A-A LDLT in various end-stage chronic and acute liver diseases, as well as new technical advances to overcome small graft-size syndrome by using dual-graft implantation and MRL, both of which were first developed in our department.     

Live Donor Liver Transplantation: A Valid Alternative for Critically Ill Patients Suffering From Acute Liver Failure

We report the outcome of live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients suffering from acute liver failure (ALF). From 2006 to 2013, all patients with ALF who received a LDLT (n = 7) at our institution were compared to all ALF patients receiving a deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT = 26). Groups were comparable regarding pretransplant ICU stay (DDLT: 1 [0–7] vs. LDLT: 1 days [0–10]; p = 0.38), mechanical ventilation support (DDLT: 69% vs. LDLT: 57%; p = 0.66), inotropic drug requirement (DDLT: 27% vs. LDLT: 43%; p = 0.64) and dialysis (DDLT: 2 vs. LDLT: 0 patients; p = 1). Median evaluation time for live donors was 24 h (18–72 h). LDLT versus DDLT had similar incidence of overall postoperative complications (31% vs. 43%; p = 0.66). No difference was detected between LDLT and DDLT patients regarding 1‐ (DDLT: 92% vs. LDLT: 86%), 3‐ (DDLT: 92% vs. LDLT: 86%), and 5‐ (DDLT: 92% vs. LDLT: 86%) year graft and patient survival (p = 0.63). No severe donor complication (Dindo–Clavien ≥3 b) occurred after live liver donation. ALF is a severe disease with high mortality on liver transplant waiting lists worldwide. Therefore, LDLT is an attractive option since live donor work‐up can be expedited and liver transplantation can be performed within 24 h with excellent short‐ and long‐term outcomes.     

Living donor liver transplantation in the USA

Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) accounts for a small volume of the transplants in the USA. Due to the current liver allocation system based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), LDLT has a unique role in providing life-saving transplantation for patients with low MELD scores and significant complications from portal hypertension, as well as select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Donor safety is paramount and has been a topic of much discussion in the transplant community as well as the general media. The donor risk appears to be low overall, with a favorable long-term quality of life. The latest trend has been a gradual shift from right-lobe grafts to left-lobe grafts to reduce donor risk, provided that the left lobe can provide adequate liver volume for the recipient.     

Potential immunological advantage of intravenous mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus and steroids in primary deceased donor liver transplantation and live donor liver transplantation without antibody induction.

With the current immunosuppressive regimens, graft loss secondary to immunological reasons after successful liver transplantation is a rarity; acute rejections, however, do occur, with the majority of them being steroid-responsive. The aim of the present study is to examine the rate of acute rejection with tacrolimus, intravenous (IV) mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids in primary deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) and live donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients. During the year 2005, 130 patients (mean age: 54.9 +/- 10.8, males: 84, females: 46, 112 DDLT and 18 LDLT) received primary liver transplantation. They were followed up for the incidence of acute rejection in the first 12 months. Liver biopsies were performed as clinically indicated; protocol liver biopsies were never performed. A total of 127 liver biopsies were performed. Thirty-two had a rejection activity index (RAI) score of > or =3, of which 24 biopsies in 20 patients were not treated with a steroid bolus. Eight (6.1%) patients (mean RAI score: 5.1 +/- 1.4) received 750 to 1500 mg of methylprednisolone over 3 days. Out of these, 2 were noncompliant, 4 were off MMF, and 1 was on cyclosporine. All patients responded to steroid therapy. None of the patients required any antibody preparation. In conclusion, IV MMF with tacrolimus and steroids is useful and required antirejection therapy in 6.1% of liver transplant recipients.     

Techniques of reconstruction of hepatic veins in living-donor liver transplantation, especially for right hepatic vein and major short hepatic veins of right-lobe graft

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is now widely accepted as a therapeutic option for adult patients with acute and chronic end-stage liver disease. In the early period, the left lobe was the major liver graft used in adult LDLT to ensure donor safety, especially in Eastern countries. However, the frequent extremes of graft-size insufficiency in left-lobe LDLT represented a greater risk of small-for-size graft syndrome in the recipient, which has focused attention on transplantation of the right lobe from a living donor. The major concern of right-lobe LDLT has focused on its safety for the donor and the necessity for including the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the graft to avoid congestion of the right anterior segment. The MHV carries out important venous drainage for the right anterior segment and is essential for perfect graft function. The decision of whether to take the MHV with the liver graft (extended right lobe graft) or whether to retain it in the donor, with reconstruction of the MHV tributaries in the liver graft (modified right lobe graft) has been extensively discussed in numerous studies. However, adequate right hepatic vein and major short hepatic vein (middle and inferior right hepatic vein [RHV]) drainage of the liver graft is perhaps equally important as MHV outflow drainage for the integrity of right-lobe graft function. Herein, the author describes various techniques of venoplasty of the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the major short hepatic veins to obviate venous outflow obstruction in these veins.     

Live donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure

BACKGROUND: Acute liver failure (ALF) carries a high mortality unless urgent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is performed on time. Live donors are utilized to treat this irreversible condition first in pediatric cases and then in adults. Herein, we aimed to report our experience with live donors for ALF in a country of a deceased donor organ donation rate is only 1.5 per million people. METHODS: Among the 245 live donor liver transplantations (LDLT) performed from June 1999 to December 2005, 14 of them (6%) were performed for ALF in 8 pediatric and 6 adult cases. Right lobes were harvested for the adult cases whereas left lateral segments were harvested for pediatric cases, except one child transplanted with a right lobe graft. The etiology of the disease was; acute hepatitis B in four cases, hepatitis A in three cases, Wilson disease two cases, autoimmune hepatitis in two cases, and was unknown in three cases. RESULTS: Three-year graft and patient survival is 79% for these series. Five of the six adult patients and six of the eight pediatric cases survived after transplantation. There was not any donor mortality or major morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: LDLT offers a safe and effective modality of treatment for ALF for both pediatric and adult patients to overcome the problem of organ shortage especially in countries where the chance of receiving an organ from a deceased donor is low.     

Living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis: a survey and review of technical issues

BACKGROUND: Unlike cadaveric liver transplantation, current attitudes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) quote increased risk factors in the potential recipient such as retransplantation, multiple previous surgeries, or preexisting recipient portal vein thrombosis (PVT) as absolute or relative contraindications to this procedure. METHODS: An international survey was performed to examine the attitude of transplant teams relative to LDLT in the setting of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient. A questionnaire was sent to a total of 80 transplant centers performing LDLT in the United States, Europe, Canada, Japan, Southeast Asia, and Australia. RESULTS: A response was obtained from 47 transplant centers (59% response rate). This included 2146 LDLT procedures that combined both left and right lobe allografts. The incidence of acute preexisting recipient PVT was 18 (0.8%) and of chronic PVT was 26 (1.2%). Thrombectomy was performed in 28 (64%), a jump graft in 13 (29.5%), and a combination of both thrombectomy and a jump graft in 2 (4.5%) cases. With reference to the presence of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient, 5 centers considered this to be an absolute contraindication (10.7%), 24 centers as a relative contraindication (51%), and 18 as not being a contraindication (38.3%) to LDLT. CONCLUSIONS: The overall response to our questionnaire reflected a cautious attitude within the transplant community. Ethical criteria pertaining to risk undertaken by a healthy donor in situations of higher recipient morbidity risk does seem to impact on the decision to undertake LDLT in this group of patients.     

Reappraisal of seventh-day syndrome following living donor liver transplantation

Seventh-day syndrome (7DS) is characterized by sudden failure of a liver graft that had been working normally at about 1 week after transplantation, without an identifiable cause. A nonnegligible percentage of cadaveric liver transplants have shown this type of acute graft failure, whereas 7DS has not been reported after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Among 580 adult LDLT recipients in our institution between 1997 and 2003, 3 (0.5%) showed clinical sequences typical of 7DS. All three recipients showed similar but unique clinical sequences, consisting of initial uneventful recovery, dramatic rise of serum liver enzyme levels about 1 week later despite potent antirejection therapy, and subsequent graft loss. Liver biopsy findings were compatible with massive hemorrhagic necrosis. Sustained fever lasting for 2 days preceded deterioration of liver function. All three patients died prior to the opportunity for retransplantation. Our findings suggest that, as in cadaveric donor liver transplantation, 7DS can also occur following LDLT and that a preceding episode of sustained fever may be a prodrome of 7DS although its pathogenesis is yet poorly understood.     

Outflow reconstruction in recipients of right liver graft from living donors

Right-lobe transplantation is now a commonly used procedure in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to adult recipients. However, the risk for outflow obstruction is still an issue in LDLT. The right hepatic vein (RHV) was anastomosed end to end to the graft hepatic vein without unfavorable tension on the anastomosis. The anterior wall of the recipient hepatic vein was incised longitudinally, and a V-shaped vein graft was patched to form a wide and long orifice. This new hepatic venoplasty was used in 14 adult patients who received right liver grafts and gave good results without stenosis of the hepatic venous anastomosis or other complications. Our new technique may be useful in recipients of a right liver graft when the recipient or graft RHV is not long enough. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:167-168.)     

Internal hernia of the small bowel after right-lobe live donor liver transplantation

Internal hernia of small bowel is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication of liver transplantation. We report on four patients in whom internal hernia of small bowel occurred after right-lobe live donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Three patients had small bowel herniation with volvulus around the Roux-en-Y loop whereas the other patient had herniation through the mesenteric window of transverse mesocolon after hepaticojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction. Based on clinical and radiologic findings, early diagnosis was made in all cases. All patients survived following surgical reduction of the hernia and closure of the mesenteric defect without bowel resection. Transplant surgeons should be aware of this serious complication so that early diagnosis and appropriate operative intervention can be made. The complication can be avoided with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction or meticulous closure of all mesenteric defects with non-absorbable suture materials after hepaticojejunostomy in patients undergoing right-lobe LDLT.     

Living donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was originally indicated only for elective cases of pediatric patients with end-stage liver disease. In Japan, however, where liver transplantation from brain-dead donor is performed very rarely, this indication has been expanded to emergency cases such as fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with FHF were treated between May 1992 and April 1999. Causes of acute liver failure were non-A, non-B hepatitis in 27 patients, hepatitis B virus in seven, and hepatitis A virus, Epstein-Barr virus, herpes simplex virus, and chrome poisoning in one each. RESULTS: Four patients did not undergo LDLT because of severe brain damage or combined multiple organ failure. The remaining 34 patients underwent a total of 36 LDLTs, including two retransplantations; 16 children received transplants of 17 lateral segments, three children and eight adults transplants of 11 left lobes, and seven adults transplants of eight right lobes. A total of 15 recipients died, four of primary graft dysfunction, three of refractory acute rejection, two of pneumonia, and one each of ductopenic rejection, sepsis, aplastic anemis, recurrence of Epstein-Barr virus hepatitis, multiple organ failure by chrome poisoning, and unknown hepatic failure. Primary graft dysfunction developed in adult recipients with small-for-size graft transplants, whereas refractory acute rejection and ductopenic rejection occurred in six grafts each of children with non-A, non-B FHF. CONCLUSIONS: LDLT can be safely expanded to cases of FHF in adult patients. Primary graft dysfunction in adult recipients with small-for-size left lobe grafts can be overcome by using right lobes. However, refractory acute rejection and ductopenic rejection in children remain a major problem.     

活体肝移植治疗HBV相关性急性亚急性肝功能衰竭

目的 探讨活体肝移植(living donor liver transplantation,LDLT)HBV感染导致的急性肝功能衰竭(acute liver failure,ALF)和亚急性肝功能衰竭(subacute liver failure,SALF)患者的可行性,并评价其疗效.方法 回顾性分析2000年11月至2007年10月完成的10例LDLT治疗ALF、SALF患者的临床资料.10例LDLT的供、受者均为成人,切取右半肝为移植物,8例含肝中静脉(middle hepatic vein,MHV).10例供者的评估均在确定实施LDLT的24 h内完成,供、受者手术均在确定供者后的12 h内完成.移植物质量与受者体质量比为(1.03±0.17)%(0.86%～1.22%),移植物体积与受者标准肝体积比为(52.2±11.8)%(47.6%～70.1%).结果 10例受者中,2例分别于术后7、28 d时因肺部感染、十二指肠球部溃疡穿孔腹腔感染死亡.1例胆管吻合口胆漏,经十二指肠镜下置入鼻胆管引流治愈.2例术后1周出现轻度急性排斥反应,增强免疫抑制强度后肝功能恢复正常.8例中位随访期9.6个月(2～84个月),生存质量优良.10例供者中,1例出现急性门静脉高压症导致脾脏破裂,行脾脏切除术,其后出现胆管断端胆漏,经鼻胆管引流结合经皮穿刺腹腔引流治愈.其余9例无并发症发生.结论 LDLT适宜治疗HBV感染导致的ALF、SALF,而且能获得较好的中、远期疗效.     

Reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein tributaries using the recipient's recanalized umbilical vein in right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Right-lobe grafts without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) can cause severe congestion of the anterior segment in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, the indications and methods for reconstructing the MHV or its tributaries remain controversial. METHODS: We herein describe two cases of the successful use of the recipient's recanalized umbilical vein as an interposition graft to drain the major MHV tributaries in right-lobe LDLTs. RESULTS: After surgery, both right-lobe grafts are currently functioning well and all of the reconstructed venous tributaries have been confirmed to be patent by doppler ultrasonography. The histopathological features of the recanalized umbilical vein showed an intact intima with thickened media. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the recipient's recanalized umbilical vein is a good option for reconstructing MHV tributaries in right-lobe LDLTs.