Effect of withdrawal of somatostatin plus GH-releasing hormone as a stimulus of GH secretion in obesity

OBJECTIVES: Somatostatin (SS) may not merely be inhibitory to GH secretion but, under appropriate temporal conditions, may act in a paradoxically positive manner to sensitize somatotroph responsiveness to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). SS infusion withdrawal (SSIW) produces a rebound GH rise in humans and increases GHRH-induced GH release. Theoretically, SSIW leaves the somatotroph cell in a situation of low endogenous SS. In obesity, there is markedly decreased GH secretion. In both children and adults, the greater the body mass index (BMI), the lower the GH response to provocative stimuli. It has been postulated that increased hypothalamic somatostatin secretion is the main mechanism responsible for the blunted GH secretion of obesity. There are no data evaluating GH responsiveness to SSIW plus GHRH in obese adults. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH response to SSIW plus GHRH in a group of control subjects and a group of obese patients. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Seven obese patients (six female, one male) with a BMI of 36.1 +/- 7.7 kg/m2 were studied. As a control group, seven normal subjects (six female, one male) with a BMI of 20.3 +/- 0.9 kg/m2 were also studied. Two tests were performed. On one day, somatostatin (SS) i.v. infusion (500 microg from 0-90 min) was performed followed by a placebo i.v. bolus 90 min after SS withdrawal (SSIW). On another day, SS i.v. infusion (500 microg from 0-90 min) was performed followed by a GHRH (100 microg) i.v. bolus 90 min after SS withdrawal. A second group of seven obese patients (six female, one male) with a BMI of 32.2 +/- 2.3 kg/m2 were studied. As a second control group, seven normal healthy subjects (six female, one male) with a BMI of 20.1 +/- 0.6 kg/m2 were also studied. On one day, saline infusion was performed followed by a placebo i.v. bolus at 90 min. On another day, saline infusion was performed followed by a GHRH (100 microg) i.v. bolus at 90 min. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH. Serum GH was measured by chemiluminescent immunometric assay. Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal subjects showed a mean peak of 15.8 +/- 2.1 microg/l. Normal control subjects had a mean peak of 3.1 +/- 1.5 microg/l after SSIW-induced GH secretion. When GHRH was administered after SSIW there was an increased GH secretion with a mean peak of 23.3 +/- 4.4 microg/l, significantly greater than the response after SSIW alone (P < 0.05) and GHRH alone (P < 0.05). GHRH-induced GH secretion in obese patients was decreased with a mean peak of 3.9 +/- 1.5 microg/l. In obese patients, GH secretion after SSIW was markedly decreased with a mean peak of 1.0 +/- 0.4 microg/l. When GHRH was administered after SSIW, an increase in GH secretion was observed with a mean peak of 4.3 +/- 0.9 microg/l, significantly greater than SSIW alone (P < 0.05) but not GHRH alone (P = NS), and significantly less than in normal subjects (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a significantly blunted peak GH response to somatostatin infusion withdrawal plus GHRH in obese patients compared to normal subjects. In this theoretical situation of decreased somatostatinergic tone, there is persistence of GH hyposecretion in obesity, suggesting the existence of multiple defects responsible for decreased GH secretion in obesity. We also found that in obese patients, in contrast to normal subjects, SSIW did not increase GHRH-induced GH secretion.     

The endocrine response to acute ghrelin administration is blunted in patients with anorexia nervosa, a ghrelin hypersecretory state

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a gastric-derived natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R), strongly stimulates GH secretion but also possesses other neuroendocrine actions, stimulates food intake and modulates the endocrine pancreas and energy homeostasis. Ghrelin secretion is negatively modulated by food intake. Similarly, glucose and also insulin probably exert an inhibitory effect on ghrelin secretion. Fasting ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, elevated in anorexia nervosa and restored by weight recovery. The chronic elevation of circulating ghrelin levels in anorexia suggested the hypothesis of an alteration of the sensitivity to the orexigenic action of ghrelin in this condition. The aim of this study was to define the endocrine actions of ghrelin in patients with anorexia nervosa. DESIGN: We enrolled nine women with anorexia nervosa of restricter type [AN; age (mean +/- SEM) 24.2 +/- 1.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 14.7 +/- 0.4 kg/m2] and seven normal young women in their early follicular phase as control group (NW; age 30.6 +/- 3.1 years; BMI 20.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: In all the subjects we studied the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus). The GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus) and basal ghrelin and IGF-I levels were also evaluated in all the subjects. RESULTS: Basal morning ghrelin and GH levels in AN (643.6 +/- 21.3 ng/l and 10.4 +/- 0.5 microg/l, respectively) were higher (P < 0.05) than in NW (233.5 +/- 14.2 ng/l and 0.7 +/- 0.7 microg/l, respectively). However, IGF-I levels in AN (145.3 +/- 10.9 microg/l) were lower (P < 0.05) than in NW (325.4 +/- 12.6 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH in AN was higher (P < 0.05) than that in NW, but in AN the GH response to ghrelin was lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW. In AN and NW ghrelin also induced similar increases (P < 0.05) in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. Ghrelin administration was followed by significant increase in glucose levels in NW (P < 0.05) but not in AN. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that anorexia nervosa, a clinical condition of ghrelin hypersecretion, shows a specific reduction in the GH response to ghrelin, despite the hyper-responsiveness to GHRH administration. The impaired GH response to ghrelin in anorexia nervosa agrees with previous evidence of blunted GH response to synthetic GH secretagogues and could reflect desensitization of the GHS receptor induced by the chronic elevation of ghrelin levels in this pathological state.     

Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I administration on the growth hormone (gh) response to GH-releasing hormone in obesity

Circulating GH levels are reduced in obesity due to true reduction of the 24-h GH production rate. GH insufficiency in obesity might reflect neuroendocrine abnormalities and/or alterations in peripheral hormones and metabolic factors. The somatotroph response to provocative stimuli including GHRH is markedly blunted in obese patients. However, the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in obesity shows also peculiar refractoriness to the inhibitory effect of glucose load. In this present study we aimed at verifying the effect of low dose rhIGF-I (20 microgram/kg, sc, at 0 min) on the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv, at 180 min) in obesity. With this goal in mind, six obese women with abdominal adiposity [OB; age (mean +/- SEM), 32.3 +/- 4.4 yr; body mass index, 32.8 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)] were studied. The effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) administration on circulating total IGF-I, insulin, and glucose levels were also evaluated. The results in OB were compared with those recorded in age-matched lean women (NW; age, 28.3 +/- 1.2 yr; body mass index, 20.1 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2)), in whom the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I had already been shown. Basal IGF-I levels in OB were similar to those in NW (199.7 +/- 33.3 vs. 274.4 +/- 25.3 microgram/L). The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from 0-180 min) in OB was lower than that in NW (0.9 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.8 microgram/L; P = NS). Administration of GHRH induced a GH response in OB lower than that in NW (area under the curve from 180-270 min, 576.5 +/- 137.5 vs. 1315.9 +/- 189.9 microgram/L.min; P < 0.02). Administration of rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels in both groups to the same percent extent (326.8 +/- 28.3 and 420.3 +/- 26.5 microgram/L in OB and NW, respectively). rhIGF-I administration inhibited the GH response to GHRH in OB (240.1 +/- 99.6 microgram/L; P < 0.05) as well as in NW (730.2 +/- 288.1 microgram/L; P < 0.05), although it failed to lower the mean GH concentration over 3 h in either OB or NW. After rhIGF-I the GH response to GHRH in OB was slight and was still lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW; in fact, the percent decreases were similar in both groups (44.21 +/- 14.06 and 48.21 +/- 13.95 microgram/L, in OB and NW, respectively). The mean insulin (107.1 +/- 21.9 and 36.8 +/- 7.2 pmol/L), but not glucose (4.0 +/- 0.3 and 4.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/L), levels calculated over 270 min, were higher (P = 0.005) in OB than in NW; rhIGF-I administration did not modify insulin and glucose levels in either group. Our study shows that the sc administration of a low rhIGF-I dose inhibits the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in obese as well as in normal subjects, indicating that somatotroph sensitivity to the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I is preserved in obesity.     

Effect of withdrawal of somatostatin plus growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone as a stimulus of GH secretion in Cushing's syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Somatostatin (SS) may not merely be inhibitory to GH secretion but, under appropriate temporal conditions, may act in a paradoxically positive manner to sensitize somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH. SS infusion withdrawal (SSIW) produces a rebound GH rise in humans and increases GHRH-induced GH release. Theoretically SSIW leaves the somatotroph cell in a situation of low endogenous SS. In Cushing's syndrome, GH secretion appears blunted to all stimuli. The mechanisms by which glucocorticoids impair GH secretion in Cushing's syndrome are unknown. There are no data evaluating GH responsiveness to SSIW plus GHRH in Cushing's syndrome patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH response to SSIW plus GHRH in a group of Cushing's syndrome patients, in order to further understand the deranged GH secretory mechanisms in Cushing's syndrome. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Eight female patients with Cushing's syndrome were studied. As a control group, eight normal subjects of similar age and sex were studied. Three tests were done. On one day, SS intravenous (i.v.) infusion (500 micro g for 0-90 min) was performed followed by placebo i.v. bolus at min 90 after SS withdrawal (SSIW). On another day, SS i.v. infusion (500 micro g for 0-90 min) was performed followed by GHRH (100 micro g) i.v. bolus at min 90 after SS withdrawal. On a third day, slow infusion of 150 mmol/l NaCl administration was performed followed by GHRH (100 micro g) i.v. bolus at min 90 after the start of the infusion. Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH. RESULTS: GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal subjects showed a mean peak of 15.4 +/- 2.1 micro g/l (conversion factor: 1 micro g/l = 1.2 mUI/l). Normal control subjects had a mean peak of 3.3 +/- 1.6 micro g/l after SSIW-induced GH secretion. When GHRH was administered after SSIW there was increased GH secretion with a mean peak of 23.7 +/- 4.2 micro g/l significantly greater than the response after SSIW alone (P < 0.05) and GHRH alone (P < 0.05). The patients with Cushing's syndrome had a blunted GH response after GHRH administration with a mean peak of 1.4 +/- 0.4. After SSIW, Cushing's syndrome patients had a mean peak of 1.0 +/- 0.5 micro g/l. When GHRH was administered after SSIW there was a similar GH response with a mean peak of 1.7 +/- 0.6 micro g/l, not statistically different than the response after SSIW alone (P = ns) and GHRH alone (P = ns). When we compare the response of normal subjects and Cushing's syndrome patients, after SSIW plus GHRH, it was decreased in Cushing's syndrome patients (P < 0.05), with a mean GH peak of 23.7 +/- 4.2 micro g/l and 1.7 +/- 0.6 micro g/l for normal subjects and Cushing's syndrome patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated a significantly blunted peak GH response to somatostatin infusion withdrawal plus GHRH in Cushing's syndrome patients. In this theoretical situation of decreased somatostatinergic tone there is persistence of GH hyposecretion in Cushing's syndrome, suggesting the existence of a pituitary defect responsible for the decreased GH secretion in Cushing's syndrome.     

Effects of short-term administration of low-dose rhGH on IGF-I levels in obesity and Cushing's syndrome: indirect evaluation of sensitivity to GH

OBJECTIVE: To verify the hypothesis of an increased sensitivity to GH in obesity (OB) and Cushing's syndrome (CS). DESIGN: We studied the effects of short-term administration of low-dose rhGH on circulating IGF-I levels in patients with simple OB or CS and in normal subjects (NS). METHODS: Nineteen women with abdominal OB aged (mean +/- s.e.m.) 38.2+/-3.1 years, body mass index 40.7+/-2.5 kg/m(2), waist to hip ratio 0.86+/-0.02, ten with CS (50.4+/-4.2 years, 29.7 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2)) and 11 NS (35.0+/-3.6 years, 20.5+/-0.5 kg/m(2)) underwent s.c. administration of 5 microg/kg per day rhGH at 2200 h for four days. Serum IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), GH-binding protein (GHBP), insulin and glucose levels were determined at baseline and 12 h after the first and the last rhGH administration. RESULTS: Basal IGF-I levels in NS (239.3+/-22.9 microg/l) were similar to those in OB (181.5+/-13.7 microg/l) and CS (229.0+/-29.1 microg/l). Basal IGFBP-3, GHBP and glucose levels in NS, OB and CS were similar while insulin levels in NS were lower (P<0.01) than those in OB and CS. In NS, the low rhGH dose induced a sustained rise of IGF-I levels (279.0+/-19.5 microg/l, P<0.001), a non-significant IGFBP-3 increase and no change in GHBP, insulin and glucose levels. In OB and CS, the IGF-I response to rhGH showed progressive increase (246.2+/-17.2 and 311.0+/-30.4 microg/l respectively, P<0.01 vs baseline). Adjusting by ANCOVA for basal values, rhGH-induced IGF-I levels in CS (299.4 microg/l) were higher than in OB (279.1 microg/l, P<0.01), which, in turn, were higher (P<0.05) than in NS (257.7 microg/l). In OB, but not in CS, IGFBP-3 and insulin levels showed slight but significant (P<0.05) increases during rhGH treatment, which did not modify glucose levels in any group; thus, in the OB patient group a significant fall in glucose/insulin ratio was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment with low-dose rhGH has enhanced stimulatory effect on IGF-I levels in OB and, particularly, in hypercortisolemic patients. These findings support the hypothesis that hyperinsulinism and hypercortisolism enhance the sensitivity to GH in humans.     

Somatostatin infusion withdrawal: studies in normal children and in children with growth hormone deficiency

Withdrawal of a somatostatin infusion (SSIW) is followed by a rebound rise of GH in both animals and normal adult men, a phenomenon likely mediated by endogenous GHRH function. In the present study, we have evaluated the GH response to SSIW in a group of 28 prepubertal children (18 boys and 10 girls; aged 3.7-11.1 yr). Six children had GH deficiency [GHD; GH responses to pyridostigmine (PD)+GHRH and to clonidine <20 and <7 microg/L, respectively], 4 children had GH neurosecretory dysfunction (GHND; GH responses to PD+GHRH and to clonidine > or =20 and >7 microg/L, respectively; mean integrated nighttime GH concentrations <3 microg/L), and 18 children were short normal children [normal controls (NC)]. All children received a constant infusion of SS at the dose of 3 microg/Kg x h for 90 min. SSIW elicited a clear-cut GH rise in NC children (13.7+/-1.0 microg/L), but not in GH-deficient children, regardless of the underlying etiology (GHD, 1.6+/-0.4 microg/L; GHND, 2.4+/-0.3 microg/L). The GH response to SSIW was similar between GHD and GHND children. There was no overlapping of the maximum SSIW-stimulated GH peaks between NC and GHD or GHND children. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that SSIW elicits a significant GH rise in NC children, but not in GH-deficient children, regardless of the underlying etiology (GHD or GHND). This resulted in complete discrimination of NC from GHD or GHND children. Were these present findings confirmed on a larger number of children, SSIW, because of its testing efficaciousness and safety, procedural simplicity, and economy holds promise of being a useful diagnostic tool for GH-dependent growth disorders.     

Effects of 36 hour fasting on GH/IGF-I axis and metabolic parameters in patients with simple obesity. Comparison with normal subjects and hypopituitary patients with severe GH deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Reduction of growth hormone (GH) secretion in obesity probably reflects neuroendocrine and metabolic abnormalities. Even short-term fasting stimulates GH secretion and distinguishes normal from hypopituitary subjects with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Marked weight loss improves GH secretion in obesity but the effect of fasting is controversial. We studied the effects of a 36 h fasting on the GH/IGF-I axis and metabolic parameters in obesity. SUBJECTS: We studied nine obese patients (OB; three male and six female; age, 29.2+/-4.8; range, 18-59 y; body mass index (BMI), 43.4+/-2.7 kg/m(2); WHR, 0.9+/-0.1). Fifteen normal subjects (NS; eight male and seven female 28.9+/-0.6, 25-35 y; 21.6+/-0.4 kg/m(2)) and 10 adult hypopituitary patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD; seven male and three female; 37.6+/-2.3, 29-50 y; 24.5+/-1.0 kg/m(2); GH peak<3 microg/l after ITT and/or<9 microg/l after GHRH+arginine) served as control groups. STUDY DESIGN: We studied the effects of 36 h fasting on 8 h diurnal mean GH, insulin and glucose concentrations (mGHc, mINSc and mGLUc; assay every 30 min from 8.00 am to 4.00 pm) as well as on IGF-I, IGFBP-3, ALS, IGFBP-1, GHBP and free fatty acid (FFA) levels. RESULTS: Before fasting, basal IGF-I and ALS levels in OB were similar to those in NS and both were higher (P<0.001) than those in GHD. IGFBP-3 levels in OB were lower (P<0.01) than in NS but higher (P<0.02) than in GHD. GHBP levels in OB and GHD were similar and both were higher (P<0.01) than in NS. Glucose levels were similar in all groups. FFA levels in OB were higher (P<0.01) than in NS but similar to those in GHD. IGFBP-1 in OB were lower (P<0.05) than in NS and GHD which, in turn, were similar. On the other hand, mINSc in OB was higher (P<0.01) than that in NS and GHD which, in turn, were similar. The mGHc in OB was similar to that in NS but only the latter was higher (P<0.05) than in GHD. The individual mGHc in the three groups overlapped. After fasting, IGF-I levels in GHD were unchanged while they decreased in OB (P=NS) as well as in NS (P<0.01). IGFBP-3 and ALS levels did not change. GHBP levels in OB and GHD were unchanged while they increased in NS (P<0.01). Glucose and FFA levels were reduced and increased, respectively, in all groups (P<0.02 and P<0.01). IGFBP-1 increased while mINSc decreased in all groups (P<0.02 and P<0.01); in OB they persisted lower and higher (P<0.01) respectively, than in NS and GHD. Fasting significantly increased mGHc in NS (P<0.001) but not in OB as well as in GHD. Individual mGHc in OB showed persistent overlap with GHD. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term fasting does not increase GH secretion in obesity and does not distinguish somatotroph function in obese from that in severe GHD adults. Short-term fasting in obesity has attenuated effects on insulin and IGFBP-1 secretion while it normally increases free fatty acids in spite of any change in GH secretion.     

Comparison between insulin tolerance test,growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH), GHRH plus acipimox and GHRH plus GH-releasing peptide-6 for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency in normal subjects,obese and hypopituitary patients

OBJECTIVE: It has been gradually realized that GH may have important physiological functions in adult humans. The biochemical diagnosis of adult GHD is established by provocative testing of GH secretion. The insulin-tolerance test (ITT) is the best validated. The ITT has been challenged because of its low degree of reproducibility and lack of normal range, and is contra-indicated in common clinical situations. Furthermore, in severely obese subjects the response to the ITT frequently overlaps with those found in non-obese adult patients with GHD. DESIGN: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of four different stimuli of GH secretion: ITT, GHRH, GHRH plus acipimox (GHRH+Ac), and GHRH plus GHRP-6 (GHRH+GHRP-6), in two pathophysiological situations: hypopituitarism and obesity, and normal subjects. METHODS: Eight adults with hypopituitarism (four female, four male) aged 41-62 Years (48.8+/-1.4 Years), ten obese normal patients (five female, five male) aged 38-62 Years (48.1+/-2.5 Years), with a body mass index of 34.2+/-1.2 kg/m(2), and ten normal subjects (five female, five male) aged 33-62 Years (48.1+/-2.8 Years) were studied. Four tests were performed on each patient or normal subject: An ITT (0.1 U/kg, 0.15 U/kg for obese, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min), GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) preceded by acipimox (250 mg, orally, at -270 min and -60 min) (GHRH+Ac); and GHRH (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) plus GHRP-6 (100 microg, i.v., 0 min) (GHRH+GHRP-6). Serum GH was measured by radioimmunoassay. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon rank sum and by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: After the ITT the mean peak GH secretion was 1.5+/-0.3 microg/l for hypopituitary, 10.1+/-1.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 17.8+/-2.0 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH-induced GH secretion was 2+/-0.7 microg/l for hypopituitary, 3.9+/-1.2 microg/l (P=NS vs hypopituitary) for obese and 22.2+/-3.8 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. After GHRH+Ac, mean peak GH secretion was 3.3+/-1.4 microg/l for hypopituitary, 14.2+/-2.7 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 35.1+/-5.2 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal. GHRH+GHRP-6 induced mean peak GH secretion of 4.1+/-0.9 microg/l for hypopituitary, 38.5+/-6.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for obese and 68.1+/-5.5 microg/l (P<0.05 vs hypopituitary) for normal subjects. Individually considered, after ITT, GHRH or GHRH+Ac, the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal but higher than the minimal response in obese subjects. In contrast, after GHRH+GHRP-6 the maximal response in hypopituitary patients was lower than the minimal response in normal and obese subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, in this group of patients, although both acipimox and GHRP-6 partially reverse the functional hyposomamotropism of obesity after GHRH, but are unable to reverse the organic hyposomatotropism of hypopituitarism, the combined test GHRH+GHRP-6 most accurately distinguishes both situations, without the side effects of ITT.     

The negative GH auto-feedback in childhood: effects of rhGH and/or GHRH on the somatotroph response to GHRH or hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in children

Aim of the present study was to further clarify the negative GH auto-feedback mechanisms in childhood. To this goal we studied the effects of rhGH and/or GHRH administration on the GH response to GHRH or hexarelin (HEX), a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in normal short children. In 34 prepubertal children (12 girls and 22 boys, age 8.2- 14.2 yr) with normal short stature (normal height velocity and IGF-I levels) the following tests were performed: group A (no.=11): GHRH (GHRH 1 - 29, Geref, Serono; 1 microg/kg iv at 150 min) preceded by saline or GHRH at 0 min; group B (no.=6): GHRH preceded by saline or rhGH (0.005 IU/kg iv at 0 min); group C (no.=6): GHRH preceded by rhGH alone or combined with GHRH; group D (no.=6): HEX (2 microg/kg iv at 150 min) alone or preceded by rhGH. In group A, the GH response to GHRH was not modified by pre-treatment with GHRH (GH peak, mean+/-SEM: 16.7+/-2.9 vs 15.1+/-2.3 microg/l, respectively). In group B, the GH response to GHRH was clearly inhibited by rhGH (8.7+/-2.3 vs 38.8+/-4.5 microg/l, p<0.001); the GH rise after rhGH in group B overlapped with that after GHRH in group A. In group C, the GH response to GHRH after pre-treatment with rhGH (13.2+/-4.0 microg/l) was similar to that in group B and was not significantly modified by pre-treatment with rhGH+ GHRH (6.9+/-2.7 microg/l); the GH rise after rhGH+GHRH was higher (p<0.05) than that after rhGH alone. In group D, the GH response to HEX was significantly blunted by pre-treatment with rhGH (34.1+/-11.7 vs 51.2+/-17.9 microg/l, p<0.05). Our results demonstrate that in childhood the somatotroph response to GHRH is preserved after GHRH while it is inhibited after rhGH administration, which is also able to blunt the GH response to HEX. Thus, the somatostatin-mediated negative GH auto-feedback is already operative in childhood; the reason why the GHRH- induced GH rise is not inhibited by GHRH pre-treatment is unexplained.     

Activation of the somatotropic axis by testosterone in adult men: evidence for a role of hypothalamic growth hormone-releasing hormone

Testosterone (T) is known to affect the growth hormone (GH) axis. However, the mechanisms underlying the activation of GH secretion by T still remain to be clarified. Available data in animals and humans have shown that withdrawal of somatostatin (SRIH) infusion induces a GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-mediated rebound release of GH, and there is accumulating evidence that SRIH infusion withdrawal may be a useful test to probe the GHRH function in vivo. With the aim of investigating whether the stimulatory effect of androgens on GH release in man could be accounted for by activation of the hypothalamic GHRH tone, we evaluated the plasma GH response to SRIH withdrawal in 10 patients aged 29.6 +/- 2.4 years (mean +/- SEM), diagnosed with hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, before and after a 6-month replacement therapy with T enanthate (250 mg every 3 weeks, i.m.), and in 10 healthy men, aged 26.7 +/- 2.8 years. To verify whether the modulation of GH secretion by T could also be mediated through changes in SRIH tone and/or pituitary releasable pool, we examined GH secretory responses to combined GHRH and L-arginine (ARG) in the same individuals. Basal plasma concentrations of GH (0.48 +/- 0.11 microg/l) and IGF-I (23.79 +/- 1.83 nmol/l) were significantly lower in untreated hypogonadal patients than in healthy men, and significantly increased after T replacement therapy (GH 1.13 +/- 0.28 microg/l; IGF-I 28.71 +/- 1.46 nmol/l). The mean Delta GH peak after SRIH withdrawal recorded in untreated hypogonadal men (2.65 +/- 0.86 microg/l) was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that observed in healthy men (6.53 +/- 1.33 microg/l) and significantly increased after T replacement therapy (5.52 +/- 1.25 microg/l). The GH responses to GHRH combined with ARG (a functional SRIH antagonist) were not significantly different between healthy men and untreated hypogonadal patients, and were not significantly affected by T treatment. Plasma T and estradiol (E(2)) levels significantly correlated with Delta GH peak after SRIH withdrawal in healthy men and in T-treated hypogonadal patients, whereas in untreated patients they did not. No significant correlation was found between GH areas under the curve after GHRH + ARG test and T and E(2) plasma levels in either healthy men or in hypogonadal patients (both before and after T replacement). These findings are consistent with the view that in humans the stimulatory action of T on the GH axis appears to be mediated at the hypothalamic level primarily by promoting GHRH function.     

Sequential administration of arginine and arginine plus GHRH to test somatotroph function in short children

The hormonal diagnosis of GH deficiency in childhood is conventionally based on the GH response to at least two provocative stimuli. Among these, arginine (ARG) has long been considered a classical, centrally mediated stimulus of GH secretion. ARG is also able to potentiate the GH response to GHRH, likely inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin; this combined test is one of the most potent to explore the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells. Based on these premises, we verified whether the sequential administration of ARG and ARG+GHRH could be feasible as single step provocative test to evaluate the GH releasable pool in short children. To this goal, 48 normal short children (35 M and 13 F, 12.0+/-0.4 yr, PS 1: 255 II-IV: 23) underwent a test with ARG (0.5 g/kg i.v. from 0 to +30 min) followed by a coadministration of ARG (from +120 to 150 min) plus GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v. at +120 min). ARG alone elicited a clear GH response (mean peak vs baseline: 12.1+/-1.7 vs 2.0+/-0.4 microg/l, p<0.001, Cmax range 12-51.0 microg/l). Following this GH rise, the hormonal levels at +120 min approached to baseline levels (4.2+/-0.8 microg/l) but then showed marked response to the coadministration of ARG+GHRH. The GH peak following ARG+GHRH (mean peak: 47.8+/-3.3 microg/l, p<0.001; Cmax 22.4-150.0 microg/l) was clearly higher (p<0.001) than that recorded after ARG alone. The GH responses to both ARG and ARG+GHRH were independent of gender, puberty, height velocity, body mass index (BMI) and IGF-I levels. Nine normal short children (16%) had GH peaks lower than 7 microg/l after ARG alone, while none showed GH peak below 20 microg/l after ARG+GHRH. Thus, ARG alone is a good stimulus of GH secretion but false positive responses frequently occur in normal short children. ARG+GHRH is a more potent stimulus giving no false positive responses even after previous challenge with ARG alone. Testing with sequential administration of ARG and ARG+GHRH may allow the single step evaluation of the somatotroph response to central and pituitary stimuli in short children.     

Short children with familial short stature show enhancement of somatotroph secretion but normal IGF-I levels

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH status in children with familial, idiopathic short stature (FSS). To this goal we evaluated the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg iv) + arginine (ARG) (0.5 g/kg iv) test which is one of the most potent and reproducible provocative tests of somatotroph secretion, in 67 children with FSS [50 boys and 17 girls, age 10.8+/-0.4 yr, pubertal stages I-III, height between -3.6 and -1.6 standard deviation score (SDS), target height <10 degrees centile, normality of both spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion as well as of IGF-I levels]. The results in FSS were compared with those in groups of children of normal height (NHC) (42 NHC, 35 boys and 7 girls, age 12.0+/-0.5 yr, pubertal stages I-III, height between -1.3 and 1.4 SDS, height velocity standard deviation score (HVSDS)>25 degrees centile, GH peak >20 microg/l after GHRH+ARG test, mean GH concentration [mGHc]>3 microg/l) and children with organic GH deficiency (GHD) (38 GHD, 29 boys and 9 girls, age 11.2+/-3.7 yr, pubertal stages I-III, height between -5.7 and -1.3 SDS, GH peak <20 microg/l after GHRH +ARG test, mGHc <3 mg/l). Basal IGF-I levels and mGHc were also evaluated in each group over 8 nocturnal hours. IGF-I levels in FSS (209.2+/-15.6 microg/l) were similar to those in NHC (237.2+/-17.2 microg/l) and both were higher (p<0.0001) than those in GHD (72.0+/-4.0 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH +ARG test in FSS (peak: 66.4+/-5.6 microg/l) was very marked and higher (p<0.01) than that in NHC (53.3+/-4.5 microg/l) which, in turn, was higher (p<0.01) than in GHD (8.2+/-0.8 microg/l). Similarly, the mGHc in FSS was higher than in NHC (6.7+/-0.5 microg/l vs 5.1+/-0.7 microg/l, p<0.05) which, in turn, was higher than in GHD (1.5+/-0.2 microg/l, p<0.0001). In conclusion, our present study demonstrates that short children with FSS show enhancement of both basal and stimulated GH secretion but normal IGF-I levels. These findings suggest that increased somatotroph function would be devoted to maintain normal IGF-I levels thus reflecting a slight impairment of peripheral GH sensitivity in FSS.     

Effects of free fatty acids and acipimox, a lipolysis inhibitor, on the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in anorexia nervosa

OBJECTIVE: Anorexia nervosa is characterized by low IGF-1 and high GH and free fatty acid (FFA) levels. As FFA exerts an inhibitory feedback action on GH secretion in physiological conditions, we hypothesized that somatotroph cells could be less sensitive to the negative feedback action of FFA in anorexia nervosa. PATIENTS: Fifteen patients with anorexia nervosa (AN, age: mean +/- SEM: 20.8 +/- 1.2 years, BMI: 15.9 +/- 0.3 kg/m2) and 12 normal female controls (NW, age 27.2 +/- 2.1 years, BMI 21.2 +/- 2.2 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: We studied the effects of lipid-heparin emulsion (Li-He, Intralipid 10% 250 ml + heparin 2500 U iv from -60 to + 90 minutes in seven AN and six NW) or acipimox (ACI, 250 mg p.o. at -60 minutes in eight AN and six NW), a lipolysis inhibitor, on the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg iv as a bolus at 0 minutes). RESULTS: Basal IGF-1 levels were lower (P < 0.05) while GH levels were higher (P < 0.05) in AN than in NW. On the other hand, basal FFA levels in the two groups were not significantly different. In both groups Li-He increased FFA levels (P < 0.05), which became higher (P < 0. 02) in AN than in NW. Li-He infusion inhibited (P < 0.05) basal GH levels in AN to levels overlapping those in NW. The GH response to GHRH in the whole AN group was higher than in NW (P < 0.03). Li-He inhibited the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in AN (P < 0.03) as well as in NW (P < 0.03) and during Li-He the GH response to GHRH in AN became similar to that in NW. Whilst ACI pretreatment enhanced the GH response to GHRH in AN (P < 0.02), it did not significantly increase that in NW. Interestingly, after ACI administration, FFA levels were inhibited in both groups (P < 0.05) persisting higher in AN than in NW (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Though GH hypersecretion in anorexia nervosa occurs in presence of enhanced lipolysis, our present findings indicate that the sensitivity of somatotroph cells to the inhibitory feedback action of free fatty acid is preserved.     

Growth hormone releasing hormone plus arginine stimulation testing in young adults treated in childhood with cranio-spinal radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE: Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) secondary to cranio-spinal radiation therapy (CSRT) is a complication seen in medulloblastoma survivors. The standard for diagnosis of adult GHD is a peak GH < 3 microg/l by the insulin tolerance test (ITT). However, insulin tolerance testing exposes patients to the risks of hypoglycaemia. Recent studies suggest that the GH releasing hormone + arginine (GHRH + ARG) test can identify GHD in cranially irradiated patients at longer time intervals after radiation. We evaluated the GHRH + ARG stimulation test compared to the ITT in young adults diagnosed with medulloblastoma during childhood. PATIENTS: We evaluated 10 young adult patients (age range 17-26 years) who were treated with CSRT during childhood for medulloblastoma, and who had resultant childhood-onset GHD. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects underwent GH provocative testing with the ITT and the GHRH + ARG test. IGF-I and IGFBP3 levels were also measured at baseline. RESULTS: Insulin tolerance testing and GHRH + arginine stimulation were performed at a mean +/- SD 14 +/- 4.4 years after cranial radiation. All patients failed the ITT with median peak GH 0.40 microg/l (range < 0.05-2.2). GHRH + arginine gave higher peak GH levels with a mean of 7.9 +/- 5.7 microg/l (P = 0.003). Four patients had peak GH > 9 microg/l and were between 7.8 and 19.6 years from cranial radiation. There was no correlation of peak GH levels with time interval since CSRT. Thirty-three per cent of subjects had normal IGF-I; neither IGF-I nor IGFBP3 standard deviation scores (SDS) correlated with ITT results. CONCLUSIONS: Using a GHRH + arginine cut-off for GHD of 9 microg/l, four patients would have been misclassified as GH sufficient, despite being > 7 years (with two patients being nearly 20 years) out from CSRT. These findings suggest that the pituitary GH-producing cells of young adults continue to maintain responsiveness to GHRH + arginine more than 5-10 years after cranial irradiation.     

Primary hypothyroidism in dogs is associated with elevated GH release

The pulsatile secretion patterns of GH were investigated in seven beagle bitches by collecting blood samples every 10 min for 6 h during euthyroidism and 1.5 years after induction of primary hypothyroidism. Hypothyroidism was induced by surgical removal of the thyroid gland and subsequent destruction of any remnant thyroid tissue by oral administration of sodium [(131)I]iodide. Some of the physical changes observed in the dogs with primary hypothyroidism mimicked those of acromegaly. During both euthyroidism and hypothyroidism GH was secreted in a pulsatile fashion. The mean (+/-s.e.m. ) basal plasma GH concentration was significantly higher (P=0.003) in the hypothyroid state (4.1+/-1.6 microg/l) than in the euthyroid state (1.2+/-0.4 microg/l). Likewise, the mean area under the curve (AUC) for GH above the zero-level during hypothyroidism (27.0+/-10.0 microg/lx6 h) was significantly higher (P=0.004) than that during euthyroidism (11.7+/-2.0 microg/l x 6 h). The mean AUC for GH above the baseline was significantly lower (P=0.008) during hypothyroidism (2.4+/-0.8 microg/l x 6 h) than during euthyroidism (4.5+/-1.8 microg/lx6 h), whereas there was no significant difference in GH pulse frequency. The mean plasma IGF-I level was significantly higher (P<0.01) in the hypothyroid state (169+/-45 microg/l) than in the euthyroid (97+/-15 microg/l). The results of this study demonstrate that primary hypothyroidism in dogs is associated with elevated basal GH secretion and less GH secreted in pulses. This elevated GH secretion has endocrine significance as illustrated by elevated plasma IGF-I levels and some physical changes mimicking acromegaly. It is discussed that the increased GH release in hypothyroid dogs may be the result of the absence of a response element for thyroid hormone within the canine pituitary GH gene and alterations in supra-pituitary regulation.     

Assessment of GH/IGF-I axis in obesity by evaluation of IGF-I levels and the GH response to GHRH+arginine test.

The GH response to provocative stimuli in obese is often as low as in panhypopituitaric patients with severe GHD; however, IGF-I levels are normal or slightly reduced. In 53 patients with simple obesity (11 M and 42 F, age: 40.3+/-1.6 yr, BMI: 39.1+/-1.0 Kg/m2), we evaluated the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg iv)+arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv), and total IGF-I levels. The mean (+/-SE) GH peak after GHRH+ARG was markedly lower (74% reduction, p<0.0001) in obese (16.8+/-2.0 microg/l) than in normal subjects (62.7+/-4.3 microg/l). IGF-I levels in obese patients (134.0+/-7.6 microg/l) were lower (33% reduction, p<0.001) than in normal subjects (200.8+/-5.7 microg/l). Taking into account the 3rd centile limit of normal response, the GH response to GHRH+ARG was reduced in 62.3% (33/53) of the obese patients, and 21.2% (7/33) of them had low IGF-I levels. Assuming the 1st centile limit, it was reduced in 33.9% (18/53) obese subjects, and 22% (4/18) of them had low IGF-I levels. Considering 3.0 microg/L as arbitrary cut-off, the GH response was reduced in 5.7% (3/53) of the obese patients, and still one of them had low IGF-I levels. Our findings: a) confirm that the secretory capacity of somatotroph cells is often deeply impaired in obesity; b) demonstrate that IGF-I assay generally rules out severe impairment of GH/IGF-I axis in obese patients with marked reduction of the GH secretion; c) indicate that the percentage of obese patients with concomitant reduction of GH secretion and IGF-I levels is not negligible. Thus, IGF-I assay should be routinely performed in obese patients; those presenting with low IGF-I levels should undergo further evaluation of their hypothalamo-pituitary function and morphology, particularly in the presence of empty sella.     

Impaired secretion of growth hormone-releasing hormone, growth hormone and IGF-I in elderly men

The GHRH test and L-dopa test were performed in 12 normal young men (24.1 +/- 1.1 years) and 12 normal elderly men (77.8 +/- 1.4 years) to investigate age-related changes in secretion of GHRH, GH and IGF-I. The basal plasma levels of GHRH and GH were not significantly different in young and elderly men, but the basal plasma level of IGF-I was higher in the young men (159.0 +/- 11.7 vs 86.7 +/- 11.6 micrograms/l). The area under the curve for plasma GH in the GHRH test was less in the elderly group (35.1 +/- 5.9 vs 11.2 +/- 2.1 micrograms.h-1.l-1, p less than 0.001). The AUCs for the plasma GHRH and GH responses in the L-dopa test in young and elderly men were 32.0 +/- 2.7 vs 20.3 +/- 1.8 ng.h-1.l-1 (p less than 0.001), and 21.8 +/- 4.6 vs 5.4 +/- 1.1 micrograms.h-1.l-1 (p less than 0.01), respectively, indicating decreased releases of GHRH and GH in the elderly. Correlations between the AUCs for plasma GHRH and GH responses in L-dopa were found in both groups, but the ratio of the AUCs for GH/GHRH was lower in the elderly group. The elderly group showed a significant correlation between the basal plasma IGF-I level and the AUCs for plasma GH in the GHRH and L-dopa tests. These results suggest that elderly men have a decreased reserve of hypothalamic GHRH, resulting in secondarily impaired GH release, which may lead to a lower level of IGF-I than in young men.     

Arginine counteracts the inhibitory effect of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I on the somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone in humans

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) exerts a negative feedback effect on GH secretion via either direct actions at the pituitary level or indirect ones at the hypothalamic level, through stimulation of somatostatin (SS) and/or inhibition of GHRH release. In fact, recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) in humans inhibits spontaneous GH secretion as well as the GH response to GHRH and even more to GH/GH-releasing peptides, whose main action is on the hypothalamus, antagonizing SS and enhancing GHRH activity. The aim of the present study was to further clarify in humans the mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced inhibition of somatotroph secretion. In six normal young volunteers (all women; mean +/- SEM: age, 28.3+/-1.2 yr; body mass index, 21.3+/-1.2 kg/m2) we studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv, at 0 min), both alone and combined with arginine (ARG; 0.5 g/kg, iv, from 0-30 min), which probably acts via inhibition of hypothalamic SS release, after pretreatment with rhIGF-I (20 microg/kg, sc, at -180 min) or placebo. rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels (peak at -60 vs. -180 min: 54.9+/-3.9 vs. 35.9+/-3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05) to a reproducible extent, and these levels remained stable and within the normal range until 90 min. The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from -180 to 0 min) before ARG and/or GHRH was not modified by placebo or rhIGF-I. After placebo, the GH response to GHRH (peak, 23.6+/-2.9 microg/L) was strikingly enhanced (P < 0.05) by ARG coadministration (69.6+/-9.9 microg/L). rhIGF-I blunted the GH response to GHRH (13.1+/-4.5 microg/L; P < 0.05), whereas that to GHRH plus ARG was not modified (59.5+/-8.9 microg/L), although it occurred with some delay. Mean glucose and insulin concentrations were not modified by either placebo or rhIGF-I. In conclusion, ARG counteracts the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in humans. These findings suggest that the acute inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to GHRH takes place on the hypothalamus, possibly via enhancement of SS release, and that ARG overrides this action.     

Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency after pituitary surgery: the combined acipimox/GH-releasing hormone test

OBJECTIVE: Reduction of plasma free fatty acids leads to enhanced GH response after stimulation by GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). We studied the clinical usefulness of combined administration of acipimox and GHRH for the diagnosis of GH deficiency. DESIGN: We evaluated 35 patients [mean age 53.0 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 26.7 kg/m2] after pituitary surgery. We compared GH responses after acipimox and GHRH with the GH response during an insulin tolerance test (ITT) and, in a subgroup of 12 patients, with the GHRH/arginine test. The acipimox/GHRH test was additionally performed in 21 control subjects (mean age 53.8 years; mean BMI 24.7 kg/m2). RESULTS: In the patients, the mean (+/- SEM) peak GH was almost four-fold higher after acipimox/GHRH (6.94 +/- 1.07 microg/l, range 0.46-23.1; P < 0.001) and after GHRH/arginine (8.32 +/- 1.23 microg/l, range 1.1-49.2; P < 0.001) than after ITT (1.84 +/- 0.46 microg/l, range 0.01-11.9). According to the ITT, 29 patients were severely GH deficient (peak GH < 3.0 microg/l). Peak GH levels after acipimox/GHRH in controls ranged from 7.5 to 78.4 microg/l (mean 29.3 +/- 3.5). GH peak values during the acipimox/GHRH test were significantly correlated with values from the ITT (r = 0.63, P < 0.01) and GHRH/arginine test (r = 0.87, P < 0.001). Areas under the curve were also correlated. According to generally accepted cut-off peak GH levels for the ITT and GHRH/arginine test, a GH peak exceeding 11.2 micro g/l excludes severe GH deficiency after acipimox/GHRH. Our control data indicate that the cut-off level is lower at older age. CONCLUSIONS: The acipimox/GHRH test leads to GH responses similar to those of the GHRH/arginine test, and to higher peak GH values if compared with the ITT. The acipimox/GHRH test is a potential additional tool to detect GH deficiency in patients with pituitary disease, in particular in patients with a perturbation of fatty acid metabolism.     

The GHRH/GHRP-6 test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in elderly or severely obese men

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: Ageing and obesity result in decreased activity of the GH/IGF-I axis and concomitant impaired GH responses to secretory stimuli. We therefore determined the validity of the GH cut-off value of 15.0 microg/l in the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)/GH releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in elderly or severely obese men. METHODS: We performed a combined GHRH/GHRP-6 test in ten elderly men (mean age 74 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 24.6 kg/m(2)), nine obese men (mean age 47 years; mean BMI 40.6 kg/m(2)) and seven healthy male controls (mean age 51 years, mean BMI 24.3 kg/m(2)). After assessment of fasting plasma GH, IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), GHRH (100 microg) and GHRP-6 (93 microg) were given intravenously as a bolus injection. Repeated GH measurements were performed for two hours. RESULTS: Both peak GH levels and areas under the curve (AUC) were significantly lower in the obese than in the controls (peak 13.2 vs 53.4 microg/l, P = 0.001; AUC 707 vs 3250 microg/l x 120 min; P = 0.001). Mean GH response in the elderly was lower than in the controls (peak 35.0 microg/l; AUC 2274 microg/l x 120 min), but this was not statistically significant. In contrast, GH peak levels in seven obese men remained below the cut-off level of 15.0 microg/l associated with severe GH deficiency. All others had GH peak levels exceeding this threshold. IGFBP-3 levels were significantly lower in the elderly than in the controls (1.35 vs 2.05 mg/l, P = 0.001). Baseline GH or IGF-I did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: GH responses following GHRH/GHRP-6 administration were significantly reduced in severely obese men, but were not significantly reduced in elderly men, despite a negative trend. Our data indicate that the cut-off GH level of 15.0 microg/l after GHRH + GHRP-6 administration for the diagnosis of severe GH deficiency cannot be used in severely obese men.