Phase II trial of gemcitabine concurrent with radiation for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiation is the current standard of treatment for patients with advanced unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Due to the potent radiosensitizing properties of gemcitabine, we decided to assess its efficacy and toxicity with concurrent radiation in patients with advanced HNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1997 to December 2001, 27 patients with locally advanced HNSCC (stage III, 37%; stage IV, 63%) were enrolled. All received a course of radiotherapy (70 Gy over 7 weeks) concurrent with weekly infusions of gemcitabine at 100 mg/m2 or 50 mg/m2. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for toxicity and 26 for response. Severe mucositis (grade 3-4) was observed in 74% of patients (grade 4, 41%). Severe hematological toxicity was uncommon. Mild and moderate xerostomy was the most common late toxicity in 23 patients (85%). The median radiation dose delivered was 70 Gy (40-80 Gy), 25 patients (93%) received > or = 80% of the intended dose. Gemcitabine dose intensity was > or = 80% in only 13 (48%) patients. The rate of complete and partial responses were 61% and 27%, respectively, for an overall response rate of 88%. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 6-62), the actuarial 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 37% and 33%, respectively. The only variable associated with prolonged survival (P = 0.0001) was the degree of response. No difference was observed in response or toxicity with either gemcitabine 50 or 100 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent use of radiotherapy and gemcitabine is effective but produces manageable severe mucositis in a high percentage of patients.     

High-dose versus low-dose cisplatin in advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma: a randomized study

From November 1981 to February 1983, 64 patients with advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma were randomly treated with either high-dose (120 mg/m2) or low-dose (60 mg/m2) cisplatin. Of the 62 eligible patients, 59 were evaluable: the response rate observed in patients receiving high-dose and low-dose cisplatin was 16.1% and 17.8%, respectively. Survival was superimposable in the two treatment arms. No evidence of dose dependency of cisplatin activity in advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma was noted in this randomized trial.     

Treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with concurrent bleomycin and external beam radiation therapy.

Nineteen patients with advanced head and neck cancer were treated with bleomycin (15u BM and irradiation (180 rad, 5d/week, 5040 rad) and have analyzed the effects. Most patients went on to further radical treatment. Both epithelial toxicity and tumor regression seemed enhanced. Approaching 1 year minimum follow-up (2 years maximum) crude survival is 68% and disease-free survival is 57%. Late complications do not seem to be enhanced. Regression in advanced nodal disease was less impressive.     

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with or without misonidazole: results of a prospective randomized study in stage III-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

From 1979 to 1980, 52 patients with Stage III-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were included in a prospective randomized study on hyperfractionated radiotherapy with or without misonidazole. The radiotherapeutic schedule consisted of two weeks of treatment split by a rest-period of one month, 6 X 1.1 Gy fractions per day for 5 consecutive days (total dose: 2 X 33 Gy/30 f/5 d). Total dose of misonidazole was 12 g/m2 administered daily in 1.2 g/m2 fractions. The overall tolerance of misonidazole was good, with a neuropathy rate of 5.7%. Local control, recurrence and 3 year survival rates did not statistically differ between the two groups. The randomized trials published at the present time, including our own, suggest that misonidazole has no beneficial effect with classical, concentrated or multiple fractions per day radiotherapy.     

局部晚期头颈部鳞癌同步放化疗研究进展

同步放化疗(CCRT)是治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞癌的新热点。对以手术治疗为主的局部晚期头颈部鳞癌而言,CCRT的疗效与以手术为主的综合治疗的疗效相似,同时保全了器官及功能;对传统采用非手术治疗的局部晚期头颈部鳞癌而言,CCRT取得了更理想的局部控制率、无远处转移率和生存率。因此,CCRT为局部晚期肿瘤的临床治疗提供了新的模式。     

局部晚期头颈部鳞癌同步放化疗研究进展

同步放化疗（CCRT）是治疗局部晚期头颈部鳞癌的新热点。对以手术治疗为主的局部晚期头颈部鳞癌而言，CCRT的疗效与以手术为主的综合治疗的疗效相似，同时保全了器官及功能；对传统采用非手术治疗的局部晚期头颈部鳞癌而言，CCRT取得了更理想的局部控制率、无远处转移率和生存率。因此．CCRT为局部晚期肿瘤的临床治疗提供了新的模式。     

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

From January, 1976 to January, 1980, 141 patients (135 males and 6 females) with Stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck received a split course of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFR). In the first group, involving 91 patients, the therapeutic schedule was as follows: first and fourth week, 7.2 Gy per day in 8 sessions of .9 Gy from Monday to Friday, the second and third week no irradiation was given. Thus, patients were given 72 Gy total dose, fractionated into 80 sessions. Mucosal necrosis and severe hemorrhage were responsible for the death of 26 patiens (28%). Therefore the therapeutic protocol was altered for the 50 patients of the second group: during the first and sixth week 6.6 Gy per day in 6 sessions of 1.1 Gy from Monday to Friday. The total dose was thus reduced to 66 Gy fractionated into 60 sessions, resulting in the decrease of toxicity. Regardless of the therapeutic protocol and site of primary, 114 patients (80%) achieved a complete remission and 8 showed a partial remission (>50%), whereas no change was seen for the 19 remainders. Local recurrence appeared in 60 patients (48%). Acute mucositis and laryngeal edema regularly occurred a week after every course of HFR and were considered severe in 40 patients. In spite of toxicity, the median survival is 14 months and 22 patients are still alive in November 1981: 19 without disease, and 8 of these patients have a survival time of at least 3 years.     

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide with or without weekend carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized trial

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the addition of weekend chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin/etoposide to hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) and concurrent daily carboplatin/etoposide offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT/daily carboplatin/etoposide. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 195 patients (Group I, 98; Group II, 97) were treated with either Hfx RT to a total tumor dose of 69.6 Gy via 1.2 Gy b.i.d. fractionation and daily 50 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group I) or the same Hfx RT with daily carboplatin/etoposide consisting of 30 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide and with weekend (Saturdays and Sundays) 100 mg each of carboplatin and etoposide during the RT course (Group II). RESULTS: No difference was found regarding median survival time and 5-year survival rates (20 vs. 22 months and 20% vs. 23%; p = 0.57). Median time to local progression was 20 and 19 months, respectively, while 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 28% and 27%, respectively (p = 0.66). Also, there was no difference regarding either median time to distant metastasis and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (21 vs. 25 months and 29% vs. 34%, p = 0.29). There was no difference in the incidence of various nonhematologic toxicities between the two treatment groups, but patients treated with the weekend CHT had significantly more high-grade (> or = 3) hematologic toxicity (p = 0.0046). Late high-grade toxicity was not different between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of weekend carboplatin/etoposide did not improve results over those obtained with Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose, daily carboplatin/etoposide, but it led to a higher incidence of acute high-grade hematologic toxicity.     

High-dose intra-arterial cisplatin boost with hyperfractionated radiation therapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) cisplatin boost with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX-RT) in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with locally advanced primary SCCHN were treated on consecutive phase I/II studies of HFX-RT (receiving a total of 76.8 to 81.6 Gy, given at 1.2 Gy bid) and IA cisplatin (150 mg/m(2) received at the start of and during RT boost treatment). RESULTS: Acute grade 3 to 4 toxicities were as follows: grade 4 and grade 3 mucosal toxicity occurred in three (7%) and 31 patients (69%), respectively, and grade 3 hematologic, infectious, and skin events occurred in one patient each. Eight of 24 patients (33%) were unable to receive a second planned dose of IA cisplatin because of general anxiety (n = 5), nausea and/or emesis (n = 2), or asymptomatic occlusion of an external carotid artery (n = 1). Thirty-seven patients (88%) experienced complete response (CR) at primary site. Twenty-nine (85%) of 34 patients presenting with nodal disease experienced CR. The actuarial 2-year rates of locoregional control and disease-specific and overall survival are 73%, 63%, and 57%, respectively, with a median active follow-up of 30 months. CONCLUSION: In this highly unfavorable subset of patients, these results seem superior to previously reported chemoradiation regimens in more favorable patients. Use of a second dose of IA cisplatin boost was associated with increased toxicity without obvious therapeutic gain. This novel strategy allows for an incremental increase in the treatment intensity of the HFX-RT regimen recently established as superior to once-a-day RT.     

Combined postoperative radiotherapy and weekly cisplatin infusion for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: preliminary report of a randomized trial

A prospective clinical trial was designed to evaluate efficacy, toxicity, and patient compliance of concomitant postoperative radiotherapy and Cisplatin infusion in patients with Stage III or IV S.C.C. of the head and neck and histological evidence of extra-capsular spread of tumor in lymph node metastase(s). Cisplatin 50 mg IV with forced hydration was given or not every week (i.e., 7 to 9 cycles) concurrently with radiotherapy. Between 1984 and 1988, 83 patients were randomized: 44 were treated by irradiation without chemotherapy (RT group) and 39 by the combined modality (CM group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient characteristics, primary sites, tumor differentiation, T.N. stages, or postoperative prognostic factors. All patients completed the planned radiotherapy. There were seven severe toxicities (greater than grade 3) in the RT group. In the CM group, 30 severe toxicities occurred in 16/39 (41%) patients but none was life-threatening. Seven of 39 (18%) patients received less than two-thirds of the scheduled Cisplatin courses because of intolerance, mainly nausea and vomiting. Preliminary results show a better disease-free survival for the CM group (65% at 24 months) than for the RT group (41% at 24 months). This significant difference is largely due to increased loco-regional control in the CM group (79% vs 59%), the actuarial distant metastasis rates in patients controlled above the clavicles not being statistically different in the two groups.     

Weekly and 3-weekly cisplatin concurrent with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer

In loco-regionally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC), concurrent 3-weekly cisplatin improves overall survival (OS) compared to radiotherapy alone, but is often associated with renal toxicity. The use of radiotherapy with accelerated fractionation schedules has been reported to improve survival but its optimal combination with chemotherapy is unclear. Retrospective analysis of treatment outcome and nephrotoxicity of radiotherapy given with an intensity-modulated approach (IMRT) concurrent with either 3-weekly or weekly cisplatin in 94 patients with stage III/IV HNSCC. Patients treated with weekly cisplatin were significantly older (p=0.0014) and received a significantly lower total cisplatin dose (p=0.0002). With a median follow-up of 2.8 years, at univariate analysis, 3-weekly cisplatin shows a longer OS (p=0.041) but progression-free survival (PFS) is similar for both schedules (p=0.47). Cisplatin doses >240 mg/m(2) were associated with better OS but not PFS. Chronic renal failure rate was significantly higher with 3-weekly cisplatin (p=0.04). Multivariate analysis (Cox regression controlling for age) confirmed the significant and independent impact of alcohol and smoking habits on both PFS (HR, 2.2) and OS (HR, 2.3), while the treatment schedule affected only OS (HR, 2.2). Weekly cisplatin is less nephrotoxic. Both schedules can be combined to curative IMRT. PFS was not significantly different even if patients treated with the weekly schedule were significantly older and received reduced cisplatin doses. The study suggests that the different cisplatin dose doesn't affect the PFS results if concomitant to IMRT. Controlled prospective studies are needed.     

Concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with weekly low-dose cisplatin for high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II prospective trial

Aims

Several randomised trials have tested adjuvant regimens using concomitant high-dose cisplatin and radiotherapy to improve outcome in high-risk locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (HNSCC), showing a substantial increase in locoregional control and disease-free survival, despite a higher and eventually detrimental toxicity profile. The aim of the present phase II single-stage prospective study was to investigate whether a weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy regimen might be able to improve patients’ compliance compared with standard-dose cisplatin with similar outcome results.

Materials and methods

Between January 2004 and November 2008, 54 patients with high-risk locally advanced HNSCC were enrolled on to this phase II trial. Patient characteristics were: median age 59.7 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 in 72% of patients and stage IV disease in 82%, extracapsular nodal spread in 67% and positive/close surgical margins in 37%. Patients received cisplatin (30 mg/m²) once a week for 7-8 weeks concurrent with external beam radiotherapy delivered with a median dose of 66.6 Gy (1.8 Gy each day; five fractions/week) on the primary site and 50 Gy (2 Gy each day) for the lower neck.

Results

Major acute toxicity of the combined treatment, defined as grade 3-4 mucositis, was observed in 35.2% of patients. No fatal complications occurred, with 81.5% of patients completing the planned regimen. Late reactions were mild (total 16% with a grade 3 dysphagia rate of 12%). The locoregional control rate was 82%; 5 year overall and disease-free survival were 63 and 62%, respectively.

Conclusions

Concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin seems to be a feasible and well-tolerated therapeutic approach in ‘unfit’ patients. Clinical results seem to be at least comparable with those previously reported. However, to draw any definitive conclusion, large confirmatory phase III randomised trials are demanded.     

Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). In total, 37 patients with stage III or IV SCCHN were enrolled on the study. The chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of intravenous cisplatin of 80 mg m(-2) on day 1 and oral capecitabine 825 mg m(-2) twice daily from day 1 to day 14 at 3-week intervals. The radiotherapy (1.8-2.0 Gy 1 fraction day(-1) to a total dose of 70-70.2 Gy) was delivered to the primary tumour site and neck. The primary tumour sites were as follows: oral cavity (n=6), oropharynx (n=11), hypopharynx (n=8), larynx (n=3), nasopharynx (n=6), and paranasal sinus (n=3). After the chemoradiotherapy, 29 complete responses (78.4%) and 6 partial responses (16.2%) were confirmed. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred only in two patients, plus grade 3 febrile neutropenia was observed only in one patient. At a median follow-up duration of 19.8 months, the estimated overall survival and progression-free survival rate at 2-year was 76.8 and 57.9%, respectively. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and cisplatin was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with locally advanced SCCHN.     

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and mitomycin-C in head and neck carcinoma. A pilot study.

Seventeen patients were entered into a Phase I/II trial of concurrent hyperfractionated radiation therapy (7,440 cGy total dose; 120 cGy b.i.d.) combined with constant infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (1,000 mg/m2/24 hours for 72 hours) and cisplatin (DDP) (50 mg/m2) for a total of three cycles. Thirteen patients had Stage IV disease; three, Stage III disease; and one, Stage II hypopharyngeal disease. Thirteen of 17 patients had positive cervical lymph nodes, and the mean size of the largest lymph node was 5.5 x 5.1 cm. The patients were not treated with planned adjunctive surgery except for one patient who had a radical neck dissection for massive, rapidly growing cervical adenopathy, which recurred promptly within 1 month before the initiation of protocol therapy. After the initial six patients were entered, mitomycin-C (Mito 8 mg/m2) was added during the second cycle. All the patients completed the planned course of radiotherapy with a median dose of 7,440 cGy and a mean dose of 7,248 cGy except for two patients who died--one from toxicity and the other, suicide. The predominant toxicity was mucositis, which was grade 3/4 in 11 of 15 patients, resulting in an average interruption of radiation therapy of 12 days. Weight loss was significant and was on the average 12% of baseline weight. Hematological toxicity was mild in the 5-FU/DDP group (only one grade 3 toxicity of six) and severe in the 5-FU/DDP/Mito-treated patients (five of eight patients having grade 3/4 toxicity including one leukopenic pneumonitis death). Additional toxicity included one parapharyngeal cellulitis, which responded to antibiotics. Noncompliance with the complex regimen was only seen in three patients. One patient refused b.i.d. radiation therapy, and one patient refused further chemotherapy after the first cycle. Additionally, one patient who had a severe ethanol withdrawal reaction during the first cycle of 5-FU/DDP did not receive further chemotherapy. The complete response rate of both primary site and neck by the protocol regimen alone was 71%. However, two patients, one from each group, did undergo salvage neck dissection, and the locoregional control is currently 73%, with a mean follow-up time of 18.4 months. The feasibility of combining hyperfractionated radiation therapy with aggressive concurrent chemotherapy was demonstrated. The response and local control rate justifies the added toxicity of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy.     

Docetaxel induction therapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are often treated with induction chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, but to date without major impact on survival. The combination of cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (PF) has been used as standard induction therapy; however, poor patient survival has stimulated investigation into new agents with potential activity in SCCHN. Docetaxel has significant single-agent activity in SCCHN and has been investigated in combination with PF regimens as induction therapy. The results of six phase II studies of docetaxel-PF regimens (TPF) as induction in locally advanced SCCHN patients are reviewed and reported. Consistently, high 2-year survival rates and overall response rates were demonstrated across the phase II trials in the range 42-82 and 71-100%, respectively. The toxicity profile seen with TPF-based regimens was acceptable. The primary toxicity was neutropenia, which together with gastrointestinal complaints accounted for the majority of adverse events. Given the encouraging phase II experience with TPF-based regimens, two large-scale phase III studies comparing TPF-based regimens with standard PF regimens are underway. The results have significant potential for validating the findings of the phase II studies, demonstrating improved survival and overall response of patients treated with docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy.