The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for primary teeth: review of literature

There is widespread interest in and increasing usage of the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique or approach for the restoration of primary teeth, especially in developing countries. However, most of the published reports of the clinical performance of newer, more-viscous esthetic conventional glass ionomer restorative cements marketed for the technique have been from short-term studies, and there have been very few reports comparing different types of restorative materials and methods of cavity preparation. After 12 months, Class II/multisurface and Class III/IV ART restorations have generally shown success rates of approximately 55-75% and 35-55%, respectively. Failures were usually from restoration losses and fractures. Class I & V/single-surface ART restorations have had much better short-term success rates of approximately 80-90%. Recurrent caries was not a concern at this time, but occlusal wear was relatively high. Further improvements in the mechanical and adhesive properties of the newer cements are still required, together with further clinical investigations of the remineralization of shallow open preparations as an alternative to placing restorations. The ART approach is readily accepted by children and has resulted in the retention of many teeth that would otherwise have been extracted.     

Glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: review of literature

AIM: To review the success of newer, more-viscous aesthetic conventional glass ionomer cements (GICs), that have been marketed specifically for the atraumatic restorative (ART) technique or approach, when used as pit and fissure sealants. As part of this approach, enamel fissures adjacent to the ART restorations are conditioned with poly (acrylic) acid (PAA) and then usually sealed with a GIC, using the finger-press method. RESULTS: The newer GICs appear in vitro to penetrate adequately and seal occlusal fissures in permanent molar teeth, and clinical studies of the ART approach over three years have found sealant retention (full and partial) to be approximately 70%, with fissure caries approximately 0-4%. In two studies, fissure caries was significantly reduced in sealed as compared with unsealed teeth over three years. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results appear to be better with the newer than with earlier conventional GIC products, the ART studies have generally involved populations at low-risk to caries, and further improvements in the mechanical properties of the cements are required for optimal long-term clinical success. Etching the enamel fissures with phosphoric acid, instead of conditioning with PAA, before GIC sealant placement warrants clinical investigation.     

Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment

BACKGROUND: Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) is recommended for use worldwide, not only in developing countries where resources are not readily available, but also in more industrialized countries. The antibacterial properties of restorative dental materials may improve the restorative treatment outcome. Glass ionomer cement (GIC) has been advocated as the preferred restoration material for ART. The authors evaluated the antibacterial properties of restorative materials-three GICs and a zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE)-in vitro. METHODS: Streptococcus mutans, Actinomyces viscosus and Enterococcus faecalis were the test microorganisms. The authors used a quantitative microtiter spectrophotometric assay to evaluate the antibacterial effect of the restorative materials using the direct contact test (DCT) of freshly prepared and one-week-aged materials. RESULTS: The freshly prepared GICs and ZOE showed no bacterial growth in all tested bacteria compared with a control. This effect lasted for at least one week for S. mutans and A. viscosus but not for E. faecalis. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional GICs used in ART showed antibacterial surface properties against cariogenic bacteria for at least one week. Further study on the long-term antimicrobial effects of GICs is needed. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The antimicrobial properties of freshly prepared restorative materials and aged restorative materials used in ART have a potent effect against cariogenic bacteria. These properties have crucial importance in preventing secondary caries.     

A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique

The purpose of the study was to evaluate, in a clinical study over 2 years, the deterioration of two glass ionomer cements used with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique or approach. Fifty-five Fuji IX and 45 ChemFil Superior restorations were placed randomly in 23 adult patients, mainly in small occlusal preparations in molar teeth. The restorations were placed in a dental hospital by one dentist using the ART technique. Photographs, radiographs and replicas were obtained at baseline and subsequent recalls. Both cements were easy to mix and place, but the radiolucency of ChemFil Superior was a disadvantage. Both cements also showed early high losses of sealant and restorative material. After 2 years, 34.5% of the sealants appeared to be completely lost, with caries recorded in 5.3% of the exposed fissures. In some instances, these small lesions may have been present, but not detected clinically, at the time of sealing. Restoration failures of 7.0% were from wear and fracture of the cements and recurrent caries. Mean cumulative wear was 83.1 microm for Fuji IX and 104.0 microm for ChemFil Superior, which was not statistically significant. The cements became darker after their placement to more closely match the restored teeth, but there were few exact matches. There was no surface staining and only minor marginal discrepancies and staining associated with the restorations. Although the short-term clinical performance of the two glass ionomer cements was reasonable, the materials require further improvements in their mechanical properties, to reduce sealant losses and wear. The cements evaluated appear suitable for restricted use only, in posterior teeth.     

Class III atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in adults living in West Africa--outcomes after 48 months

Jordan RA, Hetzel P, Franke M, Markovic L, Gaengler P, Zimmer S. Class III Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in adults living in West Africa – outcomes after 48 months. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2011; 39: 164–170. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S Abstract – Objectives: This observational study assessed the effectiveness of class III restorations using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach in permanent anterior teeth over a 48‐month period. Methods: Dental auxiliaries placed a total of 117 class III ART restorations in 2004, using a cosmetically improved glass‐ionomer (Ionofil^® Plus; VOCO, Cuxhafen, Germany), in 67 patients with a mean age of 27.3 years in the rural Jahali Health Center, The Gambia. Independent examiners evaluated the restorations after 24 and 48 months using the clinical ART evaluation criteria. Results: Seventy‐six of the restorations could be observed over 48 months in 51 patients. After 48 months, 53 of 76 restorations were classified as clinically acceptable (without or with minor intervention (repair) needed), and 23 restorations were classified as insufficient. There was no statistical difference in a clustered performance rating between restorations placed in central and lateral incisors (P = 1.0). Conclusions: The adoption of the ART approach to class III caries cavities made restorative dental care in anterior teeth available in a West African region. The long‐term performance was comparable to other studies. Longitudinal clinical studies with greater populations are required to substantiate these results.     

The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for the management of dental caries.

There is worldwide interest in and increasing usage of the conservative atraumatic restorative treatment technique or approach for the restoration of primary and permanent teeth. However, most published data on the clinical performance of the newer, high-strength esthetic conventional glass-ionomer restorative cements marketed for the procedure have been derived from short-term studies. There have been very few reports comparing different types of restorative materials and methods of cavity preparation. In primary teeth, after 1 year, success rates have been approximately 80% to 95% for Class I and Class V single-surface restorations, 55% to 75% for Class II multisurface restorations, and 35% to 55% for Class III and Class IV restorations. In permanent teeth, after 2 to 3 years, success rates have been approximately 90% for Class I and Class V single-surface restorations, but little data have been reported for other restoration classes. Failures usually result from restoration losses, fractures, and wear. Further improvements in the design of hand instruments and in the mechanical properties of the newer glass-ionomer cements are required. Currently, use of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach should be restricted to restoration of single-surface caries lesions, especially in permanent teeth, and to sealing of occlusal fissures in selected teeth.     

Volumetric contraction in some tooth-coloured restorative materials

BACKGROUND: Much of the concern about the setting contraction of tooth-coloured restorative materials has been focused on the composite resins. This study investigated setting contraction of a range of glassionomer materials and included, for comparison, products from other groups of restorative materials. METHODS: A deflecting disk method was used to determine the volumetric contraction of three conventional (non-light cured) glass-ionomer cements (GICs), two restorative, one "lining" consistency and one adhesive/lining consistency resin-modified glass-ionomers (RMGIs), two resin adhesives, three restorative composite resins and two compomers. The influence of powder:liquid ratio on two hand-mixed materials was also examined. RESULTS: The light-cured materials (including RMGIs) showed substantially greater per cent contraction at 5 minutes than did the three conventional GICs (not light cured) and a substantially greater proportion of the 30-minute contraction had occurred at 5 minutes for these light-cured materials. Their further contraction after 1 hour was generally less than 5 per cent of the 1 hour contraction. CONCLUSION: Although the conventional GICs contract more slowly in the first 5 minutes, by 30 minutes the current restorative GICs and RMGIs exhibit a volumetric setting contraction that is comparable with the composite resins and compomers and is generally in the range of 2-3 per cent.     

Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations placed in school children in China over a 6-year period. METHODS: This study was implemented in 1996 and 294 ART restorations were placed in 197 children aged 12-13 years by five assistant dentists in four schools. Standard ART procedures and instruments were used combined with a high-strength glass-ionomer restorative material. One examiner evaluated the restorations annually using the ART criteria while at 5 years an independent external examiner used US Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria. RESULTS: Fifty-eight per cent of the restorations were followed for 6 years. At the 6-year evaluation examination, 76% and 59% of the small and large restorations respectively were present and were without major wear or defect (P < 0.01). Similar results were obtained when using the USPHS criteria. Results of a multilevel survival analysis show that the correlation between restoration failure and operator was small but failure of restorations placed in the same child was substantial. Net wear of the small and large restorations after 6 years were 176 and 172 microm respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The 6-year survival rate of the class I ART restorations in this study, especially the smaller ones, was satisfactory. This suggests that the ART approach can be used in the school setting to improve the oral health of large populations of underserved children.     

The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: an evaluation after 12 months

BACKGROUND: The authors undertook a study to evaluate the effect of two cavity preparation methods on the initial survival of two more-viscous glass ionomer cements, or GICs, placed in the occlusal surfaces of permanent molar teeth. METHODS: Three dentists placed 149 restorations in 68 adult patients in a hospital clinic. They used either atraumatic restorative treatment, or ART, or conventional cavity preparation methods to place two encapsulated esthetic conventional GICs: Fuji IX GP (GC International Corp., Tokyo) and Ketac-Molar Aplicap (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). For comparison, they used high-copper-content GK Amalgam Alloy (Advanced Technology & Materials Co. Ltd., Beijing) in conventional preparations. They evaluated the restorations using both direct and indirect observation methods. RESULTS: Cavity preparations for which the authors used ART hand instruments took approximately twice as long to complete as did those for which they used conventional rotary instruments. After 12 months, no restorations had failed, but restorations comprising both GICs showed early losses of adjacent sealant material. Both GICs also showed relatively high restoration wear. At 12 months, the mean cumulative net occlusal wear for Fuji IX GP was 77 +/- 47 micrometers, and for Ketac-Molar 83 +/- 51 microm, without statistical significance (P > .05). Color matching improved significantly with time (P < .001), without significant differences in color between the two GICs by 12 months (P = .09). The amalgam alloy had minor surface tarnishing and marginal discrepancies increased with time (P < .00 1). CONCLUSIONS: All of the occlusal restorations were rated as satisfactory after 12 months. The method of cavity preparation did not affect the restoration performance of the GICs. However, their deterioration requires long-term monitoring. Clinical Implications. The more viscous GICs appear initially suitable for restricted use in clinical practice when placed using either of two cavity preparation methods in the occlusal surfaces of permanent molar teeth in adults.     

Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year clinical study in Malawi--comparison of conventional amalgam and ART restorations

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the quality of class I restorations made with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and conventional class I amalgam restorations. METHODS: The study was carried out among secondary school students in Mzuzu, Malawi. First-year students in 1987 who needed at least two class I restorations were selected. Based on a split-mouth design, each participant received both ART and conventional restorations. The 89 pairs of class I cavities were divided randomly into two groups, since two different cermet ionomer cement (CIC) filling materials were used. Impressions of the restorations and subsequent models were made shortly after restoration, after six months, one year, two years, and three years. The quality of the restorations was determined on the models following the US Public Health Service criteria. Bulk fracture, contour, marginal integrity, and surface texture of the restorations were recorded and evaluated separately. Survival rates were determined by the resultant score of all criteria. RESULTS: Though conventional amalgam restorations performed better on all criteria, this difference was significant only for the contour criterion. The survival rates of ART restorations after three years (81.0%) were lower than those of amalgam restorations (90.4%) (P=.067). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of ART class I restorations is competitive with that of conventional amalgam restorations.     

Assessment of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in high-caries Filipino children: results after 2 years

BACKGROUND: The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART), using only hand instruments and glass-ionomer cement as adhesive material is recommended for restorative dental treatment in disadvantaged communities lacking electricity and sophisticated dental equipment. Research is required on more durable restorative materials appropriate for populations with high-caries experience. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate, under field conditions, the applicability and effectiveness of an encapsulated amalgam as restorative material in ART prepared cavities in permanent teeth of children with high-caries rates. As the definition of ART restricts the manual treatment to adhesive materials the approach used is called the manual restorative treatment (MRT). METHODS: Two dentists and two trained healthcare workers, using hand instruments and an encapsulated amalgam that was mixed with a manually driven triturator, placed a total of 934 restorations in the permanent dentition in 466 children. Due to irregular school attendance of Filipino children only 611 restorations could be evaluated by one independent dentist. The average age at reassessment of restorations was 27 +/- 4.5 months. RESULTS: 93.3% of the restorations were acceptable. The failure rate of occlusal surface restorations was 5.6% compared with 13.6% of buccal surface fillings. The survival rate of large occlusal restorations was 95.1% compared with 93.7% for small restorations. The survival of MRT restorations was not influenced by the experience and professional level of the operator. CONCLUSIONS: Amalgam is a suitable MRT material, especially for extensive occlusal lesions in high-caries populations. Studies of longer duration are needed to confirm this finding.     

The physical and adhesive properties of dental cements used for atraumatic restorative treatment

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART), a recently reported field dentistry technique, involves removal of carious debris using only hand instruments and placement of a glassionomer cement (GIC) restoration. While small ART-GIC restorations are effective short-term replacements for lost tooth form, many larger ART-GIC restorations are defective after two years. Presently, resin-modified GICs (R-M GIC) are available which require no special activation equipment and handle easily in field settings. This study measured the com- pressive, tensile, and shear bond strengths to enamel and dentin of a conventional ART-GIC (Fuji IX) and two R-M GICs (Fuji Plus and Advance) at a powder-to-liquid ratio of 3.6:1. The compressive strengths of the GICs tested were significantly different. Fuji IX had the highest compressive strength, and Advance had the lowest strength (p < 0.05). The tensile strength of the R-M GICs was greater than that of the ART-GIC. Fuji Plus showed the highest shear bond strength to enamel and dentin and was significantly different from both Fuji IX and Advance. A clinical protocol is presented followed by case reports where the ART technique was used for management of acute caries in a modern dental setting.     

How effective is ART in the management of dental caries?

The ART approach involves excavating cavitated dentine caries with hand instruments, then restoring the cavity and sealing any associated fissures and pits with an adhesive restorative material, resulting in a sealant restoration. Until recently, ART has mainly been used under field conditions, and thus the adhesive restorative material used has been glass ionomer which does not require mixing machines and curing lights. Since the inception of ART, a growing number of studies world-wide have taken place. A total of four studies have reported 3-year survival percentages for one-surface ART restorations. The highest 3-year survival percentage in permanent teeth was 88%, which is comparable to the 85% survival of one-surface amalgam restorations placed under the same field conditions after 3 years. The outcomes depend to some extent on the material used, operator experience and presence of caries. The presence of caries as a reason for failure was higher in the early than in the most recent studies. Only one study has reported on the use of ART restorations in the deciduous dentition. It is concluded that: a very large proportion of dentine lesions in the permanent teeth can be treated using the ART approach; the 3-year survival rate of the more recently placed one-surface ART restorations in permanent teeth was higher than that of ART restorations placed in the beginning; the survival of one-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition with newer glass ionomers is comparable to that of one-surface conventional restorations placed using amalgam in a comparable setting after 3 years; more studies of longer duration are needed to confirm these findings; ART should be considered a caries treatment modality that benefits people; and educational courses need to be organised before the approach is applied in the clinic.     

ART和传统充填技术30个月的临床观察与研究

目的评价2种ART专用玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)充填恒磨牙He面龋的效果。方法ART和传统窝洞预备方法，Fuji IX GP和Ketac-Molar为观察组，银汞为对照组。结果ART备洞时间是传统方法的2倍。30月后，2种GICS充填体He面磨损重，窝沟封闭材料缺损大，但无材料差异，无窝沟的龋坏；材料的颜色早期变化明显。银汞充填体表面着色和边缘破损情况随时间的推移而加重。结论改良的GIC适用于有选择的恒磨牙He面龋的充填。     

Painting the future for ART

The objective of this paper is to review recent research and developments with respect to the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach and to outline future areas of research and development. Areas identified as requiring further investigation include the evaluation of: ART restorations for longer than 3 years duration using recognised evaluation criteria, multi-surface ART restorations, ART restorations in primary teeth and ART sealants. In addition, the possibility and potential dangers of caries remaining after cavity cleaning with hand instruments must be investigated and the findings balanced against the known damage to sound tooth tissue caused by more routine cavity preparation techniques. New bioactive restorative materials which offer the possibility of healing dentinal caries lesions should be developed and evaluated. Finally, behavioural and educational aspects of the ART approach should be investigated.     

Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results

OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations placed in a dental clinic setting using both the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach with hand instruments, and conventional cavity preparation with rotary instruments. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Two encapsulated high-strength conventional GICs (Fuji IX GP, Ketac-Molar Aplicap) were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II preparations and one encapsulated non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy (GK-amalgam) was placed in 32 Class I preparations, in the primary molars of 60 Chinese children with a mean age of 7.40 +/- 1.24 (SD) years. Thus, 9 treatment groups were formed. RESULTS: After two years, there were no significant survival differences found among 7 of the 9 treatment groups (p = 0.99). However, two groups comprising Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar Aplicap placed in Class II cavities prepared using the ART approach showed significantly lower restoration survivals (p < 0.001). Only 3 of the 72 initially sealed fissures adjacent to the restorations appeared to retain any GIC material. CONCLUSIONS: In a clinic setting, both the ART hand instrument and conventional rotary instrument methods were equally suitable for high Class I restoration survival, but not for Class II restoration survival where the conventional cavity preparation method was preferable.     

Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: two-years results.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical performance of two glass-ionomer cements, ChemFlex (Dentsply DeTrey) and Fuji IX GP (GC), when used with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach in China. METHODS: Eighty-nine school children aged between 6 and 14 years who had bilateral matched pairs of carious posterior teeth were included. A split-mouth design was used in which the two materials were randomly placed on contralateral sides. The performance of the restorations was assessed directly and also indirectly from die-stone replicas at baseline and after 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: The 24-month cumulative survival rates of ART restorations in the primary teeth were 93 and 90% for the ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP class I restorations, respectively, while 40 and 46% of class II restorations placed with the respective materials were satisfactory. In the permanent dentition, only class I restorations were involved and the cumulative survival rates were 95 and 96% for ChemFlex and Fuji IX GP. For the primary teeth after 24 months, net mean occlusal wear was 87 microm for ChemFlex and 85 microm for Fuji IX GP. The occlusal wear in the permanent teeth was 75 microm for ChemFlex and 79 microm for Fuji IX GP. CONCLUSION: The clinical performance of both materials over a 24-month period was similar and the survival rates of class I ART restorations in both primary and permanent teeth were high.     

Dental restorative materials containing quaternary ammonium compounds have sustained antibacterial action

BackgroundThis narrative review addresses dental restorative materials with sustained antibacterial action, especially those containing quaternary ammonium compounds. Secondary caries occurs around restorations, causing further loss of mineral and breakdown of the restoration. Lesions adjacent to restorations account for more than 40% of needed restorations. Restorative materials with antibacterial properties will potentially solve this problem.Types of Studies ReviewedSeveral groups are researching composite restorative materials that incorporate antibacterial agents. These agents are mostly exhausted over time. Newer studies involve materials that incorporate antibacterial microparticles that remain active and do not leach out.ResultsOne such antibacterial agent, quaternary ammonium coupled with inorganic silica into minute particles (QASi), has been studied in the laboratory and in humans. QASi particles incorporated into dental materials retain their antibacterial action over time without leaching or loss of activity. A clinical in situ study in humans using dental composite containing QASi resulted in highly significantly less demineralization in the adjacent enamel than the control composite material.Conclusions and Practical ImplicationsDental restorative materials that contain QASi have sustained antibacterial properties, have mechanical properties comparable to those of presently marketed materials, and have been cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration. Clinical studies have shown that composites incorporating QASi have the potential to markedly reduce the occurrence of caries around restorations. Because caries around restorations is a major problem, restorative materials with sustained antibacterial properties will have an important effect in reducing secondary caries around restorations.     

The benefits of glass ionomer self-adhesive materials in restorative dentistry

Bonded, resin-based composite restorative materials have potential advantages. If the dentin bond achieved is not greater than the polymerization stress, loss of retention is likely, resulting in areas of microleakage and postoperative sensitivity. Class 5 lesions restored with no preparation have been used for testing the clinical performance of new adhesive restorative systems. Laboratory studies have demonstrated that bond strength varies according to the depth of dentin and the degree of calcification. Until the later generations of dentin bonding agents, retention rates for bonded, resin-based composites were typically more erratic and lower than glass ionomer (GI) and resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) restorative materials. Providing stress relief during setting is inherent in GI and RMGI materials, which helps to explain their good retention rates, despite their low bond strengths. GI and RMGI liners and lightly filled resin bonding agents provide similar stress relief. Current evidence supports the use of both RMGI and composite restorations placed with a liner of lightly filled resin in adhesive Class 5 restorations. Bonded, resin-based composite has the advantage of finishing to a high-gloss surface, making it more acceptable in areas of the mouth that are highly visible.     

Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults

The aim of this study was to obtain information on the restorative dental care of adults in Finland. A random sample of private dentists was drawn from the register, and in spring 2000 they were sent a questionnaire requesting them to record information for each restoration placed during one ordinary working day. A total of 800 dentists were contacted and 548 responded. The dentists reported placement of 3,455 restorations. Of these, 5% were Class I, 36% were Class II, 13% were Class III, 9% were Class IV, 21% were Class V, and 16% were extensive restorations including 4 or more surfaces. Overall, composite resin was the most common restorative material, and it was used in 79% of the restorations, whereas amalgam was used in 5%, compomers in 4%, and glass ionomers (either conventional or resin‐modified) in 7% of cases. In 5% of the cases, the tooth was restored with indirect restorative methods, using either gold or ceramic materials. Of the treatments, 65% were replacements of previous restorations. Secondary caries was the most common reason for replacement (36%, 52%, and 41% for composite, glass ionomer, and amalgam, respectively). Other common reasons were fractures of the tooth or restoration (23%, 11%, and 22% for composite, glass ionomer, and amalgam, respectively) and lost composite restorations (16%). The median age of failed restorations was 15 years for amalgam, 6 years for composite, and 7 years for conventional glass ionomer. Although the longevity of tooth coloured restorations was shorter than that of amalgam, comparisons with our previous studies indicate improved survival periods for tooth coloured materials.