A Multicenter Clinical Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: QUATTRO Study

Background

FOLFOXIRI (Fluorouracil, folinate, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), compared with FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, folinate, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab, but significantly increased the incidences of adverse events. The efficacy and safety profiles of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in ethnic Asian patients have not been established yet.

Modified FOLFOXIRI With or Without Cetuximab as Conversion Therapy in Patients with RAS/BRAF Wild‐Type Unresectable Liver Metastases Colorectal Cancer: The FOCULM Multicenter Phase II Trial

PurposeThis trial evaluated the addition of cetuximab to a modified FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI: 5‐fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) as conversion therapy in a two‐group, nonrandomized, multicenter, phase II trial in patients with initially technically unresectable colorectal liver‐limited metastases (CLM) and BRAF/RAS wild‐type.Patients and MethodsPatients were enrolled to receive cetuximab (500 mg/m²) plus mFOLFOXIRI (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², irinotecan 165 mg/m², folinic acid 400 mg/m², 5‐fluorouracil 2,800 mg/m² 46‐hour infusion, every 2 weeks) (the cetuximab group) or the same regimen of mFOLFOXIRI alone (the control group), in a 2:1 ratio allocation. The primary endpoint was the rate of no evidence of disease (NED) achieved. Secondary endpoints included resection rate, objective response rate (ORR), survival, and safety.ResultsBetween February 2014 and July 2019, 117 patients were registered for screening at six centers in China, and 101 of these were enrolled (67 cetuximab group, 34 control group). The rate of NED achieved was 70.1% in the cetuximab group and 41.2% in the control group (difference 29.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1%–48.8%; p = .005). Patients in the cetuximab group had improved ORR (95.5% vs. 76.5%; difference 19.1%; 95% CI, 17.4%–36.4%; p = .010) compared with those in control group. Progression‐free survival and overall survival showed the trend to favor the cetuximab group. The incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events was similar in the two groups.ConclusionAddition of cetuximab to mFOLFOXIRI improved the rate of NED achieved. This combination could be an option of conversion regimen for molecularly selected patients with initially technically unresectable CLM.Implications for PracticeThis trial evaluated the addition of cetuximab to a modified FOLFOXIRI as conversion therapy in a phase II trial in patients with initially technically unresectable colorectal liver‐limited metastases and BRAF/RAS wild‐type. The rate of no evidence of disease achieved was 70.1% in the cetuximab plus modified FOLFOXIRI group and 41.2% in the modified FOLFOXIRI group. Objective response rates, overall survival, and progression‐free survival were improved in the cetuximab group when compared with the modified FOLFOXIRI group. Addition of cetuximab to modified FOLFOXIRI increased the rate of no evidence of disease achieved, and this combination could be an option of conversion regimen for molecularly selected patients with initially technically unresectable colorectal liver‐limited metastasis.     

A Phase I/II Study of XELIRI Plus Bevacizumab as Second‐Line Chemotherapy for Japanese Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (BIX Study)

Background.

Capecitabine is used mainly with oxaliplatin to treat metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Results from capecitabine plus irinotecan (XELIRI) with or without bevacizumab (BV) have been reported in Europe but not in Japan. Consequently, the safety and efficacy of XELIRI plus BV in Japanese patients with mCRC were assessed in a single-arm phase II study.

Methods.

Eligible patients had had prior chemotherapy containing BV for mCRC and wild-type or heterozygous UGT1A1. Therapy in each 21-day treatment cycle consisted of capecitabine (800 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–15), irinotecan (200 mg/m² on day 1), and BV (7.5 mg/kg on day 1). The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity in phase I and progression-free survival (PFS) in phase II.

Results.

A total of 34 patients (6 in phase I, 28 in phase II) were enrolled from May 2010 to June 2011. Baseline characteristics included a median age of 60 years (range: 22–74 years) for 24 men and 10 women. No dose-limiting toxicities appeared in phase I. Median PFS was 240 days (95% confidence interval: 179–311 days). Overall response rate was 18.1%, and the disease-control rate was 90.9%. The incidence of adverse events frequently associated with irinotecan and capecitabine were neutropenia (any grade, 55.9%; grade 3 or 4, 11.8%), diarrhea (any grade, 50%; grade 3 or 4, 5.9%), and hand-foot syndrome (any grade, 61.8%; grade 3 or 4, 5.9%).

Conclusion.

Our results suggest that XELIRI plus BV is well tolerated and effective as a second-line treatment for mCRC in Japanese patients. This regimen could be especially appropriate for patients resistant to oxaliplatin-based regimens.     

Phase II Trial of Trametinib and Panitumumab in RAS/RAF Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

IntroductionMEK inhibition may overcome resistance to EGFR inhibition in patients with RAS wildtype (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We evaluated antitumor activity of trametinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) with panitumumab (EGFR monoclonal antibody) in a phase II trial.MethodsPatients with KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF wt mCRC with prior 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, +/- bevacizumab and no prior anti-EGFR therapy were treated with trametinib 1.5 mg oral daily and panitumumab 4.8 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CB; CR, PR, or SD ≥24 weeks) by RECIST v1.1. A 2-stage minimax design was used. Serial plasma circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was collected and profiled using Oncomine Lung cfDNA assay.ResultsFourteen patients were enrolled from November 2015 to April 2019. CB rate was 38% (5/13) and median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2.9-7.1). Confirmed overall response rate was 38% (5/13). Treatment-related AE (trAE) included acneiform rash (85%), diarrhea (62%), maculopapular rash (54%), mucositis (46%), and others. Dose modifications and interruptions of trametinib occurred in 69% and panitumumab in 54% of patients. The trial did not progress to stage II accrual due to tolerability and short duration of response. RAS or BRAF mutations cfDNA were detected in 3/13 patients (23%) before radiographic disease progression.ConclusionThe addition of trametinib to panitumumab led to a high rate of tumor shrinkage in RAS/RAF wt metastatic colorectal cancer, with poor tolerability due to a high incidence of skin toxicity. Median PFS was similar to panitumumab alone in historical control data.     

Perioperative Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Liver Resection

BackgroundPatients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and liver metastases benefit from perioperative chemotherapy and liver resection. The potential benefit of adding bevacizumab is yet to be defined. The impact of bevacizumab on liver resection complications has been explored in a small number of retrospective studies.MethodsThe records of patients with CRC and liver metastases who underwent liver resection and had received perioperative chemotherapy were reviewed. Complications were reported separately for 2 groups (chemotherapy alone vs chemotherapy and bevacizumab). Survival outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) for responders and nonresponders were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsFifty-two patients received chemotherapy alone and 42 patients received chemotherapy and bevacizumab. The median time from the end of systemic treatment to liver resection was 59 days (33-181 days) for the chemotherapy group and 62 days (44-127 days) for the chemotherapy and bevacizumab group. Postoperative complications developed in 54% of the chemotherapy group and in 48% of the chemotherapy and bevacizumab group. Severe complications (grade III-V) occurred in only 13% and 12%, respectively (P = .822). Pathologic complete response (CR) was seen in 11/94 patients. Poor performance status (PS) before starting chemotherapy was associated with higher rates of complications (P = .002), and severe complications led to prolonged hospital admission (P = .001). Patients with pathologic CR had longer OS (P = .0275), but there was no difference in OS between responders and nonresponders (P = .778).ConclusionThe addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy does not increase liver resection complication rates. Pathologic CR is associated with prolonged survival.     

A Prospective,Multicenter Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Feasibility of 15-minute Panitumumab Infusion Plus Irinotecan for Oxaliplatin- and Irinotecan-refractory,KRAS Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Short Infusion of Panitumumab Trial)

Background

In some recently updated clinical guidelines, the fully humanized monoclonal antibody panitumumab, combined with irinotecan, has been recommended as an optional third-line chemotherapy for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present prospective, multicenter phase II study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of short 15-minute panitumumab infusions.

Prognostic Value of the Combination of Circulating Tumor Cells Plus KRAS in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab

ObjectiveCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) and v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) status were identified as prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in analyses of the MACRO (Maintenance Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer) trial. In this post hoc analysis of the MACRO trial, the potential additive effect of these 2 factors on patient outcomes was explored.MethodsA total of 158 of the 480 patients involved in the MACRO trial were included in the biological marker substudy. CTC isolation and enumeration were centralized and performed using the CellSearch System (Veridex LLC, Raritan, NJ) in 7.5 mL of whole blood. Evaluation of KRAS status was performed retrospectively by the standard method used at each center. PFS and OS were analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method according to CTC count and KRAS status.ResultsPatients with < 3 CTC per 7.5 mL blood at baseline and KRAS wild-type tumors had a median PFS of 14.2 months compared with 6.2 months in patients with ≥ 3 CTCs and KRAS mutated tumors (P < .0001; hazard ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-5.2). Similar findings were observed for OS (28.9 and 13.7 months, respectively, P = .0004; hazard ratio 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-4.9). Multivariate analyses showed that CTC count ≥ 3 and KRAS status were the only independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS.ConclusionsThis post hoc analysis showed that CTC count and KRAS status were independent prognostic factors for outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab ± chemotherapy. These factors should be taken into account in the design of future phase III trials.     

Multicenter Single-Arm,Two-Stage Phase 2 Study of Panitumumab in Patients With Cetuximab-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The PACER Trial

PurposeTo assess whether panitumumab is active in patients with cetuximab-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patients and MethodsEligible patients had pretreated RAS (renin–angiotensin system) wild-type mCRC that progressed after cetuximab treatment, after having shown either objective response or stable disease. A minimax two-stage design was applied, with progression-free rate at 2 months as the primary end point. At least 12 of 28 and 21 of 41 successes at the first and second stage, respectively, were required for a positive result. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg was provided every 2 weeks, until progression or unacceptable toxicity.ResultsOverall, 52 patients with KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene) wild-type disease were enrolled, but 11 were found to have mutated disease after all-RAS retesting. Among 41 eligible patients, median time since diagnosis was 38 months, and 71% experienced an objective response to previous cetuximab. First stage was passed with 12 of 28 patients alive without progression at 2 months. At the second stage, 17 of 41 patients were alive without progression at 2 months. At a median follow-up of 21.8 months, 35 patients experienced disease progression, and 26 died. Median progression-free survival was 2.1 months (95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.6) and median overall survival 6.8 months (95% confidence interval, 4.6-16.6). Most of the patients experienced no adverse reactions; 25% of patients had grade 3 rash.ConclusionAccording to our study design, panitumumab was not effective in patients with cetuximab-refractory RAS wild-type mCRC.     

Phase II Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Chemotherapy‐Naïve Frail or Elderly Patients with Unresectable RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: OGSG 1602

Lessons Learned

• Panitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in the treatment of frail or elderly patients with RAS wild‐type unresectable colorectal cancer.
• It is especially effective for left‐sided tumors; therefore, panitumumab as first‐line treatment could be an additional therapeutic option for frail elderly patients, particularly in those who are unsuitable for upfront oxaliplatin‐based or irinotecan‐based combination regimens.

BackgroundFirst‐line panitumumab monotherapy is expected to be well tolerated and improve survival in patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, its safety and efficacy in chemotherapy‐naïve frail or elderly patients with unresectable RAS wild‐type (WT) colorectal cancer (CRC) have not been studied. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab as first‐line treatment.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter phase II study on patients aged ≥76 years or ≥65 years considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg of intravenous infusion was administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities.ResultsThirty‐six patients (median age: 81 [range, 67–88] years) were enrolled between February 2017 and August 2018. Two patients were excluded from the analysis of efficacy: one from lack of image examination at baseline and the other from lack of a measurable lesion. Thirty‐three (91.6%) patients had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, whereas two (5.6%) patients and one (2.8%) patient had a PS of 2 and 3, respectively. Twenty‐eight patients (77.8%) had left‐sided CRC, whereas eight (22.2%) had right‐sided CRC. The RR was 50.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.4–67.6), including three patients (8.8%) who had complete responses. A total of 26.5% had stable diseases, resulting in a DCR of 76.5% (90% CI, 61.5–87.7). The RR of patients with left‐ and right‐sided tumors was 65.4% (95% CI, 44.3–82.8) and 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0–36.9), respectively. Major grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities were rash (n = 6, 16.7%), hypomagnesemia (n = 4, 11.1%), fatigue (n = 3, 8.3%), paronychia (n = 2, 5.6%), and hyponatremia (n = 2, 5.6%). The only grade 3 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (n = 1, 2.8%).ConclusionPanitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in frail or elderly patients with RAS WT unresectable CRC. Survival analysis including OS, PFS, and TTF is currently in progress.     

A Phase 1B Study of Dulanermin in Combination With Modified FOLFOX6 Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

ObjectivesThe study objectives were to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of multiple doses of dulanermin in combination with modified FOLFOX6 and bevacizumab in previously untreated patients with locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic colorectal cancer.Patients and MethodsA total of 23 patients received dulanermin at dosages of 4.5 or 9 mg/kg/d given on days 1 to 3 of each 14-day cycle along with standard dosing of modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab. Dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events (AEs), maximum tolerated dose, and response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were assessed.ResultsIn the first cohort (3 patients given dulanermin at 4.5 mg/kg/d) and second cohort (6 patients given dulanermin at 9 mg/kg/day), no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The subsequent 14 patients were treated with a dulanermin dosage of 9 mg/kg/d. Patients (N = 23) received 2 to 42 cycles of dulanermin (median 15). The most common grade 3 or 4 AEs were neutropenia (39%), hypertension (17%), peripheral neuropathy (17%), hand-foot syndrome (13%), and pulmonary embolism (13%). Three patients (13%) discontinued the study because of serious AEs. Overall, a best response of partial response was observed in 13 patients (57%) (9 confirmed, 4 unconfirmed), stable disease was observed in 7 patients (30%), and disease progression was observed in 3 patients (13%). The median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% confidence interval, 7.0-12.7).ConclusionsOverall, the addition of dulanermin to first-line FOLFOX plus bevacizumab was well tolerated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, with similar AEs that would be expected from FOLFOX plus bevacizumab. A randomized study is required to assess the clinical efficacy of dulanermin in this patient population.     

A Randomized Phase II Study of Perioperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab Versus Postoperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Upfront Resectable Hepatic Colorectal Metastases

IntroductionWhether patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) gain a survival benefit from perioperative chemotherapy remains controversial. The benefit of including bevacizumab in chemotherapy also remains unclear.Material and MethodsSeventy-six patients with CRLM were randomly assigned to either 6 cycles of FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin)/FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) with bevacizumab before and after surgery or 12 cycles after surgery. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test.ResultsThe median PFS of all patients was 37.4 months at 5.4 years follow-up, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The PFS between the perioperative group and the postoperative group did not reveal a statistical difference (P = .280). The OS was significantly better in the perioperative group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI],) 0.35-1.02; P = .049). In subgroup patients with carcinoembryonic antigens (CEA) ≥ 5 ng/mL or those with over 2 liver metastases, perioperative group had longer OS than postoperative group (CEA: HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.93; P = .030; number of liver metastases: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-0.99; P = .049). The largest liver metastases size, disease-free interval, and sidedness did not affect PFS or OS. There was no difference between the 2 groups in postoperative complications with bevacizumab or adverse events during chemotherapy.ConclusionsIn patients with resectable CRLMs, perioperative chemotherapy had no effect on PFS, but improved OS. Patients with high CEA levels or over 2 liver metastases may benefit from perioperative chemotherapy.     

Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin and Bevacizumab,Followed by Maintenance Treatment With Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Patients Aged > 75 Years With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of CAPOX-Bev (capecitabine [Cap] plus oxaliplatin and bevacizumab [Bev]), followed by maintenance Cap and Bev, for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and aged > 75 years.Patients and MethodsThe regimen consisted of intravenous oxaliplatin 130 to 100 mg/m² on day 1, oral Cap 750 to 1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1 to 14, and Bev 7.5 mg/kg on day 1, every 3 weeks. After 4 cycles of CAPOX-Bev, the patients without evidence of disease progression received maintenance treatment with Cap 1000 to 1250 mg/m² twice daily on days 1 to 14 and Bev 7.5 mg/kg on day 1, every 3 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 9-month disease control rate. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were the secondary endpoints.ResultsOverall, 36 patients were enrolled from March 2012 to April 2017 at our institution. After completion of CAPOX/Bev, 15 patients (41.7%) had a partial response, 18 (50.0%) had stable disease, and 3 (8.3%) had progressive disease. Thirty-three patients (91.7%) received the Cap/Bev regimen as maintenance treatment for a median of 8.6 cycles (range, 3-14 cycles). The 9-month DCR was 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.8-74.5), the median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 6.7-10.3 months), and the median OS was 20.8 months (95% CI, 16.1-25.4 months). With the CAPOX/Bev regimen, the most common grade 3 toxicity included neutropenia (11.1%), diarrhea (5.5%), nausea/vomiting (2.8%), and fatigue (2.8%). Grade 3 neurotoxicity was not observed. With Cap/Bev maintenance therapy, grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was observed in 2 patients (6.0%).ConclusionCAPOX/Bev, followed by Cap/Bev as maintenance treatment, is safe and effective in terms of PFS and OS for elderly patients aged > 75 years with mCRC.     

First-in-Human Phase 1b Trial of Quinacrine Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BackgroundQuinacrine plus a fluoropyrimidine has in vivo efficacy against metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase 1b trial evaluated the combination of quinacrine plus capecitabine in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC.Patients and MethodsUsing a modified Simon accelerated titration design, adults with treatment-refractory mCRC were treated with capecitabine 1000 mg/m² twice daily for 14/21-day cycle, and escalating doses of quinacrine 100 mg daily, 100 mg twice daily, and 200 mg twice daily for 21 days. The primary endpoint was identifying the maximum tolerated dose, determining tolerability and safety. In an expansion cohort, it was overall response rate and time to tumor progression (TTP).ResultsTen patients (median age of 60 years) were treated in phase 1b. The first 2 quinacrine dosing levels were well tolerated. Dose-limiting toxicities were seen in 3 patients treated with quinacrine 200 mg twice daily. Five additional patients tolerated quinacrine 100 mg twice daily without further dose-limiting toxicities, thus establishing the maximum tolerated dose. Seven additional expansion-cohort patients enrolled onto the study before quinacrine manufacturing ceased within the United States. Five patients experienced stable disease, 1 partial response, and 10 disease progression. Median TTP overall was 2.12 months and median overall survival 5.22 months for the 17 patients.ConclusionCapecitabine and quinacrine can be safely administered at the maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine 1000 mg/m² by mouth twice daily on days 1-14 and quinacrine 100 mg by mouth twice daily on days 1-21 of a 21-day cycle in mCRC patients. Although the expansion study was halted early, TTP was in line with other studies of refractory mCRC, suggesting activity of this regimen in heavily pretreated patients.     

A Phase II Trial of Capecitabine Concomitantly With Whole‐Brain Radiotherapy Followed by Capecitabine and Sunitinib for Brain Metastases From Breast Cancer

Background.

Brain metastasis from breast cancer presents a significant threat to women’s health and quality of life. Capecitabine and sunitinib have shown some activity in this setting; therefore, we conducted a single-arm phase II trial with these agents.

Methods.

Patients with breast cancer and central nervous system (CNS) metastases received whole-brain radiotherapy concurrently with capecitabine (1,000 mg/m² per day for 14 consecutive days), followed by concomitant capecitabine (2,000 mg/m² per day for 2 weeks followed by a 1-week break) and sunitinib (37.5 mg daily, continuously). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results.

Of 25 planned patients that would be required to detect a 4-month improvement (from 5 to 9 months) in median PFS with 80% power, 12 were enrolled, and the study was then closed for slow accrual. Median PFS was 4.7 months, and median overall survival was 10 months. In the CNS, 25% had progressive disease, and 83% experienced extra-CNS progression. The most common side effects were fatigue and nausea.

Conclusion.

In 12 evaluable patients studied, concurrent capecitabine and whole-brain radiation followed by capecitabine and sunitinib did not extend PFS over historical rates and was associated with significant toxicity. Our study was small and closed due to slow accrual.