Microbial Colonization of the Peri‐Implant Sulcus and Implant Connection of Implants Restored With Cemented Versus Screw‐Retained Superstructures: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate peri‐implant and intraconnection microflora of healthy implants restored with cemented and screwed superstructures. Methods: Patients with two to three implants restored with cemented or screwed restorations and 5 years of follow‐up were recruited. Samples were taken from peri‐implant sulci, adjacent teeth, and the inner portion of connections. Prevalence of positive sites and bacterial loads for 10 microorganisms were obtained with quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Implant connection permeability to the studied microorganisms was estimated using a standardized bacterial contamination index. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized estimating equations model, Wald χ² test, and the least significant difference test. Results: The final sample consisted of 18 patients (55 implants) in the cemented group and 22 patients (46 implants) in the screw‐retained group. Regarding prevalence of positive sites, significant differences between groups were only found for Tannerella forsythia, which was 8.7 times more frequent at peri‐implant sulci of cemented than screw‐retained prostheses. Bacterial loads of Porphyromonas gingivalis, T. forsythia, Parvimonas micra, and total bacterial load were significantly higher at peri‐implant sulci for the cemented group; at the inner portion of connections, values were significantly higher for P. micra and Fusobacterium nucleatum for the screw‐retained group. Contamination index values demonstrated higher permeability to most microbes in the cemented group. Conclusions: Internal implant surfaces were microbiologically contaminated for both cemented and screw‐retained superstructures. Differences were found between the two methods of prosthetic retention: the cemented group presented significantly higher bacterial loads in the peri‐implant sulcus but significantly lower bacterial loads at the inner portion of the implant connection.     

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Two Implants with Different Prosthetic Interfaces and Neck Configurations: Randomized,Controlled, Split‐Mouth Clinical Trial

Background: Peri‐implant bone loss seems to occur following implant placement/loading regardless of all the efforts to eliminate it. Several factors, including surgical trauma, biologic width establishment, lack of passive fit of the superstructures, implant‐abutment microgap, and occlusal overloading, may increase peri‐implant bone loss. Over the years, new interface designs were introduced and clinical studies suggest that internal conical connection and platform shifting may be advantageous for marginal bone preservation. Purpose: To compare clinical and radiological outcomes of two implant designs with different prosthetic interfaces and neck configurations in a randomized, controlled, split‐mouth clinical trial. Materials and Methods: Thirty‐four partially edentate patients randomly received at least one internal conical connection with back‐tapered collar and platform shifting design or external‐hexagon implants with flat‐to‐flat implant‐abutment interface. Primary end point was peri‐implant bone level changes at different time points, failures of implants and/or prosthesis, any complications, implant stability quotient (ISQ) values, and periodontal parameters. Results: No dropout occurred. Marginal bone changes were statistically significantly different with better results for the internal conical connection. No implants and prosthesis failures have been observed, yielding a cumulative survival rate of 100%. A high ISQ value was found for both implants, and no statistically significant difference was found for ISQ mean values between interventions at each time point (p > .05). All implants showed no bleeding on probing and a very slight amount of plaque at the 1‐year‐in‐function visit. Conclusions: Both implant designs investigated performed similarly in terms of failure rates, providing successful results up to 1 year after loading. The back‐tapered neck configuration with conical connection and built‐in platform shifting showed statistically lower marginal bone loss than straight neck configuration with flat‐to‐flat implant‐abutment interface and external‐hexagonal connection.     

Effects of the Implant Design on Peri‐Implant Bone Stress and Abutment Micromovement: Three‐Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Original Computer‐Aided Design Models

Background: Occlusal overloading causes peri‐implant bone resorption. Previous studies examined stress distribution in alveolar bone around commercial implants using three‐dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. However, the commercial implants contained some different designs. The purpose of this study is to reveal the effect of the target design on peri‐implant bone stress and abutment micromovement. Methods: Six 3D implant models were created for different implant–abutment joints: 1) internal joint model (IM); 2) external joint model (EM); 3) straight abutment (SA) shape; 4) tapered abutment (TA) shapes; 5) platform switching (PS) in the IM; and 6) modified TA neck design (reverse conical neck [RN]). A static load of 100 N was applied to the basal ridge surface of the abutment at a 45‐degree oblique angle to the long axis of the implant. Both stress distribution in peri‐implant bone and abutment micromovement in the SA and TA models were analyzed. Results: Compressive stress concentrated on labial cortical bone and tensile stress on the palatal side in the EM and on the labial side in the IM. There was no difference in maximum principal stress distribution for SA and TA models. Tensile stress concentration was not apparent on labial cortical bone in the PS model (versus IM). Maximum principal stress concentrated more on peri‐implant bone in the RN than in the TA model. The TA model exhibited less abutment micromovement than the SA model. Conclusion: This study reveals the effects of the design of specific components on peri‐implant bone stress and abutment displacement after implant‐supported single restoration in the anterior maxilla.     

Influence of Crown/Implant Ratio on Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review

Background: With the increased use of short dental implants (<10 mm), a high crown/implant (C/I) ratio has become a common finding. However, the effect of the C/I ratio on the marginal bone loss (MBL) has not yet been examined extensively. Hence, the aim of the present systematic review is to explore the influence of the C/I ratio on the success rate and MBL of dental implants. Methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central) and a manual search for human trials with a minimal follow‐up of 6 months are used for the present study. A statistical analysis of the influence of the C/I ratio was performed on the peri‐implant MBL while considering follow‐up period, type of implants, implant connection, and technical and biologic complications. Results: One hundred ninety‐six potential articles were identified on the selected databases. Only 57 articles were selected for full‐text evaluation. According to the inclusion criteria, a total of 13 articles were included in this systematic review. A significant negative association between the C/I ratio and the MBL was found (P = 0.012). However, no statistically significant difference was found (P >0.15) for potential effects regarding the observation period, the type of implant connection, or between both methods of evaluating the C/I ratio. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, the C/I ratio of implant‐supported restorations has an effect on peri‐implant marginal bone level. Within the range of 0.6/1 to 2.36/1, the higher the C/I ratio, the less the peri‐implant MBL.     

Biomechanical Evaluation of Platform Switching: Different Mismatch Sizes,Connection Types,and Implant Protocols

Background: It is not yet well understood to what extent different implant–abutment mismatch sizes and implant–abutment connection types may influence the peri‐implant biomechanical environment of implants in different clinical situations. Methods: Computed tomography–based finite element models comprising a maxillary central incisor socket and 4.5 × 13 mm outer‐diameter implants with external and internal hex connection types were constructed. The abutments were designed with diameters of 3.5 mm (platform switching [PS] with 1 mm of diametral mismatch [PS ? 1]), 4.0 mm (PS with 0.5 mm of diametral mismatch [PS ? 0.5]), and 4.5 mm (conventional matching implant–abutment design [CD]). Analysis of variance at the 95% confidence interval was used to evaluate peak equivalent strain (EQV strain) in the bone, bone volume affected by a strain >4,000 με (EQV strain >4,000 με), the peak von Mises stress (EQV stress) in abutment screw, and the bone–implant relative displacement. Results: Similar bone strain levels (EQV strain and EQV strain >4,000 με) were encountered in PS ? 1, PS ? 0.5, and CD models for immediately placed implants, independent of the connection type. For immediately loaded implants, slightly smaller peak EQV strain and EQV strain >4,000 με were found for PS ? 1. However, for both connection types in osseointegrated models, the higher the mismatch size, the lesser the amount of strain found. Conclusions: The increase in mismatch size of PS configuration results in a significant decrease of strain levels in bone for osseointegrated implants, principally for external hex connections. No significant effect of PS could be noted in immediately placed implants.     

Clinical performance of a method for the fabrication of implant-supported precisely fitting titanium frameworks: a retrospective 5- to 8-year clinical follow-up study

Background: The CrescoTi Precision® (CTiP) method (CrescoTi Systems, Lausanne, Switzerland) has been introduced as an alternative method for the fabrication of precisely fitting titanium frameworks. The method is supposed to be used with all major implant systems, without the need for abutments. Purpose: The objectives of this clinical and radiographic retrospective follow‐up study were to report the clinical performances of “CTiP‐fabricated” frameworks that are screw retained directly to Brånemark implants as opposed to Brånemark implant/abutment assemblies (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) and to compare the clinical outcomes of these two modalities. Materials and Methods: Thirty‐six patients were provided with 46 fixed prostheses supported by 207 Brånemark regular‐platform implants. Twenty‐seven prostheses were placed on implant/abutment assemblies, and 19 were placed directly at “implant level.” The prostheses had been in function for 5 to 8 years at the time of the final examinations. Results: Three patients did not attend the final examination. All 43 prostheses in the 33 examined patients were still in function. No major mechanical framework complications were observed during the observation period. One implant was lost after loading. There was no difference in bone loss around the abutment‐free implants when compared with the implants provided with abutments. Conclusions: This long‐term clinical test demonstrated that the CTiP technology constitutes a reliable prosthetic treatment concept in combination with Brånemark implants. The results also revealed that the frameworks could be connected directly to the implants without any negative consequences.     

Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness on Peri‐Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Background: Multiple variables have been shown to affect early marginal bone loss (MBL). Among them, the location of the microgap with respect to the alveolar bone crest, occlusion, and use of a polished collar have traditionally been investigated as major contributory factors for this early remodeling. Recently, soft tissue thickness has also been investigated as a possible factor influencing this phenomenon. Hence, this study aims to further evaluate the influence of soft tissue thickness on early MBL around dental implants. Methods: Electronic and manual literature searches were performed by two independent reviewers in several databases, including Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles up to May 2015 reporting soft tissue thickness at time of implant placement and MBL with ≥12‐month follow‐up. In addition, random effects meta‐analyses of selected studies were applied to analyze the weighted mean difference (WMD) of MBL between groups of thick and thin peri‐implant soft tissue. Metaregression was conducted to investigate any potential influences of confounding factors, i.e., platform switching design, cement‐/screw‐retained restoration, and flapped/flapless surgical techniques. Results: Eight articles were included in the systematic review, and five were included in the quantitative synthesis and meta‐analyzed to examine the influence of tissue thickness on early MBL. Meta‐analysis for the comparison of MBL among selected studies showed a WMD of ?0.80 mm (95% confidence interval ?1.18 to ?0.42 mm) (P <0.0001), favoring the thick tissue group. Metaregression of the selected studies failed to demonstrate an association among MBL and confounding factors. Conclusion: The current study demonstrates that implants placed with an initially thicker peri‐implant soft tissue have less radiographic MBL in the short term.     

Prospective Evaluation of 2,549 Morse Taper Connection Implants: 1‐ to 6‐Year Data

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the implant survival, the implant–crown success, and the prosthetic complications of 2,549 Morse taper interference–fit connection implants. Methods: A total of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants were inserted in 893 patients from January 2003 until December 2008. At each annual recall, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters were assessed. The implant–crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility; an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact <2 mm from initial surgery; and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant–abutment interface. Prosthetic restorations were fixed partial prostheses (462 units); fixed full‐arch prostheses (60 units); single crowns (531 units); and overdentures (93 units). Results: The cumulative implant survival rate was 98.23% (97.25% maxilla, 99.05% mandible). The implant–crown success was 92.49%. A few prosthetic complications at implant–abutment interface were reported (0.37%). After 6 years, distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact was 1.10 mm (± 0.30 mm). Conclusion: The use of Morse taper connection implants represents a successful procedure for the rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous arches.     

Long‐Term Clinical,Microbiological, and Radiographic Outcomes of Brånemark™ Implants Installed in Augmented Maxillary Bone for Fixed Full‐Arch Rehabilitation

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to document the long‐term outcome of Brånemark implants installed in augmented maxillary bone and to identify parameters that are associated with peri‐implant bone level. Material and Methods: Patients of a periodontal practice who had been referred to a maxillofacial surgeon for iliac crest bone grafting in the atrophic maxilla were retrospectively recruited. Five months following grafting, they received 7–8 turned Brånemark implants. Following submerged healing of another 5 months, implants were uncovered and restorative procedures for fixed rehabilitation were initiated 2–3 months thereafter. The primary outcome variable was bone level defined as the distance from the implant‐abutment interface to the first visible bone‐to‐implant contact. Secondary outcome variables included plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, and levels of 40 species in subgingival plaque samples as identified by means of checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridization. Results: Nine out of 16 patients (eight females, one male; mean age 59) with 71 implants agreed to come in for evaluation after on average 9 years (SD 4; range 3–13) of function. One implant was deemed mobile at the time of inspection. Clinical conditions were acceptable with 11% of the implants showing pockets ≥ 5 mm. Periodontopathogens were encountered frequently and in high numbers. Clinical parameters and bacterial levels were highly patient dependent. The mean bone level was 2.30 mm (SD 1.53; range 0.00–6.95), with 23% of the implants demonstrating advanced resorption (bone level > 3 mm). Regression analysis showed a significant association of the patient (p < .001) and plaque index (p = .007) with bone level. Conclusions: The long‐term outcome of Brånemark implants installed in iliac crest‐augmented maxillary bone is acceptable; however, advanced peri‐implant bone loss is rather common and indicative of graft resorption. This phenomenon is patient dependent and seems also associated with oral hygiene.     

A Novel Rat Model of Polymicrobial Peri‐Implantitis: A Preliminary Study

Background: Peri‐implantitis is a complex polymicrobial biofilm‐induced inflammatory osteolytic gingival infection that results in orofacial implant failures. To the best knowledge of the authors, there are no preclinical in vivo studies in implant dentistry that have investigated the inflammatory response to known microbial biofilms observed in humans. The aim of this study is to develop a novel peri‐implant rat model using an established model of polymicrobial periodontitis. Methods: Wistar rats were used for the study of experimental peri‐implantitis. One month after extraction of maxillary first molars, a titanium mini‐implant was inserted. Two months after implant healing, implants were uncovered, and abutment fixing was done using cyanoacrylate to prevent abutment loosening. Rats were separated into two groups (group A: polymicrobial‐infected and group B: sham‐infected). One week after healing of abutments, rats were infected with Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia for 12 weeks. Bacterial colonization, bone resorption, and implant inflammation were evaluated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), microcomputed tomography, and histology, respectively. Results: Three rats with four implants in the infection group and two rats with three implants in the sham‐infection group were analyzed. PCR analysis revealed presence of bacterial genomic DNA, and infection elicited significant immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM antibody responses, indicating bacterial colonization/infection around implants. Infection induced an enhanced mean distance from implant platform to the first bone‐to‐implant contact, extensive peri‐implantitis with advanced bone resorption, and extensive inflammation with granulation tissue and polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Conclusions: To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first study to develop a novel rat model of polymicrobial peri‐implantitis. With modifications to improve implant retention it could offer significant advantages for studies of initiation and progression of peri‐implantitis.     

Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone maintenance around tissue level implant and bone level implant: a randomised controlled trial. A 1‐year follow‐up

The etiologic factors associated with crestal bone loss have not been comprehensively clarified. Several theories exist as to the reason for the observed changes in crestal bone height following implant restoration. In the 1990s, the wide‐diameter implants were commercially introduced. Initially, the implants were restored with standard‐diameter abutments because of lack of matching prosthetic components. Long‐term radiographic follow‐up of these ‘platform‐switched’ restored wide‐diameter dental implants has demonstrated a smaller‐than‐expected vertical change in the crestal bone height around these implants that is typically observed around implants restored conventionally with prosthetic components of matching diameters. The aim of this randomised controlled study was to assess radiographically marginal bone level alterations in implants restored according to the platform‐switching concept compared with traditionally restored implants. Fifty‐four subjects to participate in this randomised controlled study were selected. Two groups were assigned at random: control group (56 implants were restored with standard matching‐diameter abutments) and test group (58 implants were restored with medialised abutments). X‐ray explorations were taken for peri‐implant bone level at the minute the last cementing of the prosthesis and at 1‐year follow‐up. NHI Image was used to digitally process and manipulate the radiographic images and perform the measurements. Mean of bone loss with platform‐switching implants was ?0·01 mm, and the mean of bone loss with standard platform implant was 0·42 mm. Outcomes of this study indicated that the platform‐switching design could preserve the crestal bone levels to 1‐year follow‐up. There was a statistically significant difference in marginal bone loss.     

Peri‐implant soft tissue and bone crest alterations at fixed dental prostheses: a 3‐year prospective study

Objectives: The aim of this 3‐year prospective study involving patients receiving implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) was to longitudinally evaluate soft and hard tissue alterations from the time of implant placement. Material and methods: Sixteen subjects with 18 implant‐supported FDPs on 43 implants were included in the study. Peri‐implant soft and hard tissue assessments were performed at implant placement, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Variables describing the peri‐implant soft tissue conditions and topography were assessed by clinical, photographic and study model assessments. Variables of implant position and bone topography were measured in radiographs taken at each examination interval. Multilevel regression models were formulated to identify factors of significance for proximal bone crest alterations and proximal soft tissue height. Results: During the first 6 months after the one‐stage implant placement surgery, the soft tissue margin receded about 0.6 mm at facial implant sites, while a mean increase was observed at tooth‐facing proximal sites (1.1 mm) and no change at inter‐implant sites. Loss in proximal bone crest height was more pronounced at inter‐implant than tooth–implant units at 6 months (0.6 vs. 0.1 mm). Between 6 and 36 months, no further significant soft or hard tissue changes were observed. Multilevel regression analysis revealed that the proximal bone crest level significantly influenced the proximal soft tissue height assessed from the implant/abutment level. Significant predictors for loss in proximal bone crest level over the 3 years were horizontal inter‐unit distance, type of proximal unit (tooth/implant or inter‐implant) and peri‐implant bone‐level change. Conclusions: Soft and hard tissue changes around implant‐supported FDPs took place primarily during the first 6 months after the one‐stage implant installation surgery. The pattern of tissue alterations during the follow‐up differed between tooth–implant and inter‐implant proximal sites. To cite this article:
Chang M, Wennström JL. Peri‐implant soft tissue and bone crest alterations at fixed dental prostheses: a 3‐year prospective study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21, 2010; 527–534.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01874.x     

Peri-implant bone alterations in relation to inter-unit distances. A 3-year retrospective study

Abstract: The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate longitudinal alterations in radiographic bone topography at proximal sites of three‐unit implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses during the first 3 years after bridge installation, in relation to vertical and horizontal inter‐unit distances. The subjects were partially dentate patients who had received implant‐supported fixed partial prostheses during the year 1995 at the Brånemark Clinic, Göteborg, Sweden. For inclusion in the study, the patient had to have a three‐unit bridge construction supported by three implants in the posterior area of the jaw. Twenty‐eight patients having 35 screw‐retained prostheses on Brånemark standard implants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Radiographs obtained at bridge installation and at 1‐ and 3‐year follow‐ups were assessed for implant positions, contact point level, bone level at implants and adjacent tooth and mid‐proximal bone crest level. The data were analysed with respect to two proximal units: tooth/implant units (n=35) and implant/implant units (n=70). Multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the influence of various factors on the peri‐implant and periodontal bone level changes during the 3 years of follow‐up. At the tooth/implant units, the mean bone loss over the 3 years was 0.5 mm at the implant and 0.4 mm at the tooth. Multiple regression analysis failed to identify significant explanatory factors for the peri‐implant/periodontal bone level changes at the tooth/implant units (R²=0.28). At the implant/implant units, the peri‐implant bone loss was 0.6–0.7 mm and was significantly influenced by the vertical inter‐implant distance (P<0.01), the difference in bone level at baseline between two neighbouring implants (P<0.001) and the bone level changes at the opposed implant surface (P<0.001) (R²=0.49). Furthermore, the magnitude of apical displacement of the inter‐implant bone crest level during the 3 years of follow‐up was negatively associated with the horizontal inter‐implant distance (P<0.05). The results of the study demonstrated that both vertical and horizontal differences in implant positions might influence bone alterations in the inter‐implant area during the first 3 years of loading, while the data failed to show corresponding relationships for the bone changes at the proximal area between the implant and the neighbouring tooth.     

Long-term follow-up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16-22 years: radiographic and peri-implant outcome

Objectives: Retrospectively evaluate the survival, radiographic and peri‐implant outcome of single turned Brånemark^? implants after at least 16 years. Materials and methods: From 134 patients (C‐group), 101 could be contacted concerning implant survival and 50 (59 remaining implants) were clinically examined (I‐group). Marginal bone level was radiographically measured from the implant–abutment junction at baseline (=within 6 months after abutment connection) and 1–4, 5–8 and 16–22 years post‐operatively. Probing depth, gingival and plaque index were measured. Marginal bone‐level changes were analyzed using Friedman's and Wilcoxon's signed ranks tests. Spearman's correlations between radiographic and clinical parameters were calculated. Results: In the C‐group, 13 out of 166 implants in 11 out of 134 patients failed (CSR=91.5%). In the I‐group (28 males–22 females; mean age 23.9 years at baseline; range 14–57), the mean follow‐up was 18.4 years (range 16–22). The mean bone level was 1.7±0.88 mm (range ?0.8 to 5) after 16–22 years. Changes in the mean marginal bone level were statistically significant between baseline and the second measuring interval (1–4 years). Thereafter, no significant differences could be demonstrated. The mean interproximal probing depth, gingival and plaque indices were 3.9±1.27 mm, 1.2±0.81 and 0.2±0.48, respectively. Probing depth was moderately correlated with gingival inflammation (r=0.6; P<0.001) but not with bone level (P>0.05). 81.4% of the implants had a bone level ≤2nd thread and 91.5% had a probing depth ≤5 mm. 76.3% had both bone level ≤2nd thread and probing depth ≤5 mm. Conclusions and clinical implications: The single turned Brånemark^? implant is a predictable solution with high clinical survival and success rates. In general, a steady‐state bone level can be expected over decades, with minimal signs of peri‐implant disease. A minority (5%), however, presents with progressive bone loss. To cite this article :
Dierens M, Vandeweghe S, Kisch J, Nilner K, De Bruyn H. Long‐term follow‐up of turned single implants placed in periodontally healthy patients after 16–22 years: radiographic and peri‐implant outcome.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 197–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02212.x     

Efficacy of 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate for Non‐Surgical Treatment of Peri‐Implant Mucositis

Background: Because peri‐implant mucositis may progress to peri‐implantitis, effective treatment resulting in resolution of inflammation could prevent peri‐implantitis. Current treatment protocols for this condition are still unpredictable. The purpose of this study is to analyze efficacy of non‐surgical treatment for patients with peri‐implant mucositis during a 6‐month follow‐up period. Methods: This controlled, randomized, double‐masked clinical trial included 37 patients diagnosed with peri‐implant mucositis, randomly assigned into test group (basic periodontal therapy + 0.12% chlorhexidine) with 61 implants; and control group (basic periodontal therapy + placebo) with 58 implants. Therapy consisted of adaptation of the full‐mouth scaling and root planing protocol. Clinical parameters of visible plaque index (VPI), gingival bleeding index (GBI), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were measured in implants and were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months post‐therapy. Data were analyzed using the split‐plot analysis of variance and χ² tests with a significance level of 5%. Results: Intragroup analysis showed that VPI, GBI, PD, and BOP presented statistically significant improvements compared with baseline. No statistically significant differences were found between the test and control groups at any time. Conclusions: Both isolated mechanical therapy and its association with 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash reduced peri‐implant mucositis. Therefore, 0.12% of chlorhexidine was not more effective than placebo.     

Food Impaction and Periodontal/Peri‐Implant Tissue Conditions in Relation to the Embrasure Dimensions Between Implant‐Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses and Adjacent Teeth: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Background: Food impaction and periodontal/peri‐implant tissue conditions were evaluated in relation to the embrasure dimensions between implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and adjacent teeth. Methods: A total of 215 embrasures of 150 FDPs in 100 patients (55 males and 45 females, aged 27 to 83 years; mean age: 56 years) were included in the study. Clinical assessments of the periodontal/peri‐implant mucosal conditions, radiographic assessments of embrasure dimensions, and overall patient satisfaction were used as explanatory variables for the food impaction and periodontal/peri‐implant tissue conditions adjacent to implant‐supported FDPs in the generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis. Results: Food impaction was reported in 96 (44.7%) of 215 embrasures between implant‐supported FDPs and adjacent teeth. Food impaction was reported more frequently in the embrasures with proximal contact loss than in those with tight contact (P = 0.009). Overall patient satisfaction was influenced negatively by food impaction in the proximal embrasures (P = 0.01). Among embrasure dimensions, only the embrasure surface area (ESA) significantly influenced food impaction (P = 0.03). Significant influences of various embrasure dimensions on the periodontal/peri‐implant mucosal conditions and bone level at the implant were found in the univariate and multivariate GEE analyses. Conclusions: Food impaction between implant‐supported FDPs and adjacent teeth occurred more frequently when proximal contact was lost and ESA increased. Food impaction negatively affected overall patient satisfaction. Embrasure dimensions influenced the periodontal/peri‐implant mucosal conditions and bone level at the implant.     

Synergistic interactions between corrosion and wear at titanium‐based dental implant connections: A scoping review

Two‐piece implant systems are mainly used in oral implantology involving an osseointegrated implant connected to an abutment, which supports prosthetic structures. It is well documented that the presence of microgaps, biofilms and oral fluids at the implant‐abutment connection can cause mechanical and biological complications. The aim of this review paper was to report the degradation at the implant‐abutment connection by wear and corrosion processes taking place in the oral cavity. Most of the retrieved studies evaluated the wear and corrosion (tribocorrosion) of titanium‐based materials used for implants and abutments in artificial saliva. Electrochemical and wear tests together with microscopic techniques were applied to validate the tribocorrosion behavior of the surfaces. A few studies inspected the wear on the inner surfaces of the implant connection as a result of fatigue or removal of abutments. The studies reported increased microgaps after fatigue tests. In addition, data suggest that micromovements occurring at the contacting surfaces can increase the wear of the inner surfaces of the connection. Biofilms and/or glycoproteins act as lubricants, although they can also amplify the corrosion of the surfaces. Consequently, loosening of the implant‐abutment connection can take place during mastication. In addition, wear and corrosion debris such as ions and micro‐ and nanoparticles released into the surrounding tissues can stimulate peri‐implant inflammation that can lead to pathologic bone resorption.     

Effects of modified abutment characteristics on peri‐implant soft tissue health: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Objectives

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of the abutment characteristics on peri‐implant tissue health and to identify the most suitable material and surface characteristics.

Methods

A protocol was developed aimed to answer the following focused question: “Which is the effect of the modification of the abutment design in regard to the maintenance of the peri‐implant soft tissue health?” Further subanalysis aimed to investigate the impact of the abutment material, macroscopic design, surface topography and surface manipulation. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a follow‐up of at least 6 months after implant loading were considered as inclusion criteria. Meta‐analyses were performed whenever possible.

Results

Nineteen final publications from thirteen investigations were included. The results from the meta‐analysis indicated that zirconia abutments (Zi) experienced less increase in BOP values over time [n = 3; WMD = ?26.96; 95% CI (?45.00; ?8.92); p = .003] and less plaque accumulation [n = 1; MD = ?20.00; 95% CI (?41.47; 1.47); p = .068] when compared with titanium abutments (Ti). Bone loss was influenced by the method of abutment decontamination [n = 1; MD = ?0.44; 95% CI (?0.65; ?0.23); p < .001]. The rest of the studied outcomes did not show statistically significant differences.

Conclusions

The macroscopic design, the surface topography and the manipulation of the implant abutment did not have a significant influence on peri‐implant inflammation. In contrast, the abutment material demonstrated increased BOP values over time for Ti when compared to Zi abutments.

     

Survival and failure modes: platform‐switching for internal and external hexagon cemented fixed dental prostheses

This study evaluated the probability of survival (reliability) of platform‐switched fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) cemented on different implant–abutment connection designs. Eighty‐four‐three‐unit FDPs (molar pontic) were cemented on abutments connected to two implants of external or internal hexagon connection. Four groups (n = 21 each) were established: external hexagon connection and regular platform (ERC); external hexagon connection and switched platform (ESC); internal hexagon and regular platform (IRC); and internal hexagon and switched platform (ISC). Prostheses were subjected to step‐stress accelerated life testing in water. Weibull curves and probability of survival for a mission of 100,000 cycles at 400 N (two‐sided 90% CI) were calculated. The beta values of 0.22, 0.48, 0.50, and 1.25 for groups ERC, ESC, IRC, and ISC, respectively, indicated a limited role of fatigue in damage accumulation, except for group ISC. Survival decreased for both platform‐switched groups (ESC: 74%, and ISC: 59%) compared with the regular matching platform counterparts (ERC: 95%, and IRC: 98%). Characteristic strength was higher only for ERC compared with ESC, but not different between internal connections. Failures chiefly involved the abutment screw. Platform switching decreased the probability of survival of FDPs on both external and internal connections. The absence in loss of characteristic strength observed in internal hexagon connections favor their use compared with platform‐switched external hexagon connections.     

Implant-supported fixed cantilever prosthesis in partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study

Background: Reconstructive procedures present a higher rate of biological costs due to the necessity of bone harvest and grafts, use of semipermeable barriers etc. On the hand, implant supported cantilever prostheses could allow a simpler rehabilitation procedure. Aims: The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical outcome of patients treated with implant‐supported fixed partial dentures (FPD) with cantilever after a mean follow‐up time of 8 years. Material and methods: The study included 45 consecutive partially edentulous patients treated between January 1994 and August 2006 with 59 partial cantilever fixed prostheses supported by 116 ITI^® implants. The primary outcome variable considered was the presence of complications at the subject and bridge level; the secondary outcome variable was marginal bone loss (MBL). The frequency of complications was analyzed according to cantilever location and opposite dentition and tested by Fisher's exact test. A multilevel regression model was constructed to analyze the factors influencing MBL with three levels: subject as the highest, and then implant and site. During the follow‐up period, 11 implants showed a bone loss exceeding the limit for success, out of which two implants showed an infection of the peri‐implant tissue. Results: After an average observation of 8.2 years of cantilever prostheses loading, the implant success and survival rates were 90.5% and 100%, respectively. Besides, the prosthetic success and survival rate were 57.7% and 100%, respectively. Discussion: None of the predictors included in the multilevel model presented a significant impact on the bone loss between baseline and the follow‐up examination. Conclusions: The authors concluded that the prognosis of implant‐supported FPDs and marginal bone loss at implants were not influenced by the position or the length of the cantilever, the location of the bridge and type of opposite dentition. Implant‐supported fixed cantilever prosthesis can be considered a suitable treatment choice.